Slashdot Mirror


Office 2016 Proving Unstable With Apple's El Capitan

An anonymous reader writes: Users of Microsoft Office on the Mac are reporting widespread instabilities and conflicts after upgrading to the latest version of the Apple desktop operating system, El Capitan. The first indications that El Capitan and Office 2016 were not working well together came in a now epic thread at Microsoft Community. Many users have surmised that new restrictions in file permissions in El Capitan caused the problems initially, though nearly all agree that Office's Outlook email client is the critical point of failure in the current round of application crashes and loss of functionality.

138 comments

  1. Remembering what Microsoft did by msobkow · · Score: 0

    Remembering what Microsoft did to stop Lotus and WordPerfect from running on their platforms, it seems kind of fitting that they should be getting shafted by an Apple update now. :)

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget about running Windows 95 on DRDos (if OS = DRDOS, randomly throw warning/error) or Office95 on OS/2 (ask for memory at 2GB boundary, OS/2 only had 512MB windows VM). Those are 2 of the notable instances where MS purposefully made their own software flaky or broken for no reason other than to kill the competitor. I'm sure there are others.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      The job ain't done 'til Lotus don't run!

    3. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows95 included its very own DOS. You're confusing the shitty Windows 95 with the godawful Windows 3.1.

    4. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't work well on Windows either

      Written by someone about ot re-image his surface pro 3 to 8.1 and office 2013 because OneNote and Excel just worked before the downgrade to 2016. Really MS does make much better software than 15 years ago Linux users reading this. Windows 7/0ffice 2010 were it's height.

      I guess it comes to show what happens when you have no QA team left and rely on agile software development and user feed back for bugs. Until a user submits a story via a frown no one knows about the bug

      Well back to the old WindowsME days of skipping a release and waiting until service pack 1 before updating. Windows 10 too in my opinion just entered beta last August. I will switch to Office 2016 and WIndows 10 next year when update 1 of both come out.

      It is incompetence and not malicious if their freaking own OS and products like the surface can't run VBA macros and onenote properly

    5. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Remembering what Microsoft did to stop Lotus and WordPerfect from running on their platforms, it seems kind of fitting that they should be getting shafted by an Apple update now. :)

      And, worst, the kind of update that SHOULD NOT had broken them.

      Why *IN HELL* restricting system files would broek a Productivity Application?

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    6. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Windows ME? Why? You had 98SE and 2000 to choose from, and either one would be better than the hybrid abortion that was ME.

    7. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Yes, the issue was Win 3.1 with DR-DOS (eventually they had a compatibility mode) but you could run Windows 95 on DR-DOS. Windows 95-ME was still DOS + a shell. You could replace the MS-DOS with DR-DOS.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Well the "correct" course of action was to stay on Windows 98SE, wait for XP SP1. If you didn't mind being on Win 9x.

      The equivalent would be stay on XP, wait for 7 SP1 (Vista SP2 an option too) ; stay on Windows 7, wait for Windows "10.1" (or Windows 8.1.1)

    9. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did MS do to cripple Lotus 1-2-3, which was the reason people bought PCs in the early days? People repeat this, but no one has ever come up with a concrete example of how MS sabotaged the reason why their software was in demand at all.

    10. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by terjeber · · Score: 1

      what Microsoft did to stop Lotus

      This is actually urban legend. Never happened. Pure myth. Remember, Microsoft was, in the DOS days, utterly dependent on Lotus to sell PCs. Every Lotus employee involved at the time also deny there ever was such a problem.

      Lotus 1-2-3 dies because Excel was a (in areas vastly) superior product. It certainly had its flaws, but from a usability standpoint it blew Lotus out of the water. You only have to look at the Apple side of things. Lotus Symphony and Excel existed at the same time on the Mac, and I would guesstimate that Excel outsold Lotus on Apple by about a million to one.

      and WordPerfect

      This isn't even an urban legend. This never happened, and there isn't even a myth that it did.

      Word Perfect committed suicide. Word Perfect on Windows was a deeply flawed product. It was, for any windows user, a usability nightmare. The morons insisted on staying with WP shortcuts and their own (horrible) menu system despite the fact that nobody wanted it. Refusing to change, and at the release of Microsoft Word 2.0, which was a far inferior product from a technical standpoint, but good enough for 97.5% of all use-cases, WordPerfect was dead. By moronic suicide. WP refused to go the proper Windows route, their product (on Windows) was buggy as to be unusable until version 6.0a and by then the fight was over.

    11. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Myth

    12. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by tomofumi · · Score: 1

      I remember Windows 2000 was good enough and stable for daily use, if you are not into pc gaming. Win98SE still gives you lots of blue screen and reboot often.

    13. Re:Remembering what Microsoft did by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      In fact, one of the anti-monopoly cases was decided in favor of DRDOS finally decades after the injury that MS not only illegally bundles DOS with Win95, but purposefully sabotaged other DOSes if they found Win95 running on top of them. Little good it did DRDOS or IBM PC DOS, both which were arguably better than MS DOS.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  2. Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlook/Entourage on the Mac has always been a piece of crap.

    You are far better off running the Windows version in a VM or within a Wine wrapper .

    For light/average users, stick to Apple Mail/Calander/Contacts.

    1. Re:Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or good ole Thunderbird for Mac. For office there's Libreoffice for OSX.

    2. Re:Outlook by CraigCruden · · Score: 2

      I used the latest Outlook while it was in beta earlier this year - and to be quite honest.... I preferred it over the Windows Outlook. I find the Windows Outlook to be just insane with the number of buttons, and the placement of them is not always logical. I have no idea why they put the send button to the left of the to/cc addresses, other than they might have had a spot there.... most western eyes naturally flow left to right, top to bottom, then back to the top..... so the send button is the last place you would look for it when your flow has already taken you away from that location (first fill in to/cc/subject then body). There has got to be 30 buttons scattered around the mail all over the place - just full of clutter. After the beta, I decided not to buy (I have 2008 around somewhere - but don't use it anymore - I tend to use Pages/Numbers for personal, and LibreOffice for reading work documents since they are in that format).

      Now the built in email client in OS X seems to work fine with the Exchange Server (webmail since I work at home) [a year ago it use to get stuck and not update after a while] -- which makes me happy since I really only want a simple email client. Most Outlook users that I have worked with only tend to use it for email as well -- nothing that the internal OS X email client won't handle.

    3. Re:Outlook by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Outlook is a piece of crap on Windows too so that shouldn't be a surprise. In fact I'm wondering how they figured out it was acting differently with El Capitan...was it just locking up/hanging for longer than usual?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Outlook by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      My Send button is [CTRL]+[ENTER], whose location has remained constant since 1997, if not earlier.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re: Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a Mac?? Outlook has always sucked period. Everything MShitbag does turns into a windows only walled garden. Windows 10 and it's tellemetry absolute bs is why windows will never be top dog again. They are in such a rush to compete with google they threw their entire user base under the bus so they can 'get that data'.
      Pathetic to say the least. Btw, FUCK YOU billy gates. Linux romps on your ass and you bent over so fast you literally gave the os away...

  3. In order of importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    El Capitan can't run MS Office 2016.

    But since Microsoft is more responsive to customer feedback than Apple, they will probably implement a workaround.

  4. "now epic thread" by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    ego, much?

    1. Re:"now epic thread" by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  5. I know nobody RTFA's but.. by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not just El Capitan. Per the linked thread, Yosemite has the same issues.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:I know nobody RTFA's but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not (unfortunately) a joke: Microsoft's response is run disk utilities then bring your computer into the Genius bar to have your hard drive changed:

      http://answers.microsoft.com/e...

    2. Re:I know nobody RTFA's but.. by sexconker · · Score: 2

      That's a "Community Moderator", not an official MS rep.

  6. Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it wasn't so smart laying off all your QA people, eh Microsoft?

    1. Re:Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to replace them with H1B visa holders that get no vacation time unless you get rid of the Americans first?

    2. Re: Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming wrong that we got vacation time. I worked there for more than a decade and was never able to take a full week off.

    3. Re: Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Indian guys here always get two to three weeks off to go home every year. The longest vacation I've had here in six years was a Friday off.

    4. Re:Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1B visa holders that get no vacation time

      You're wrong about them not getting it. Microsoft gives them the same amount of vacation time they give us. Of course, allowing you to take vacation time is the problem. For most teams, you simply are not allowed more than a long weekend unless you are going home to Asia for two weeks.

    5. Re: Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot the liar.

    6. Re:Genuine Quality by lucm · · Score: 1

      You blame Microsoft?

      Maybe you'll have a lot of blaming to do about things that work everywhere but not on this Apple masterpiece.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re: Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switch teams. I know most developers are not allowed time off unless they're going home to Asia, but there are some teams that can take a contiguous week off.

    8. Re:Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about things that work everywhere

      And by everywhere you mean "on computers running Microsoft Windows."

    9. Re:Genuine Quality by znrt · · Score: 1

      about things that work everywhere

      And by everywhere you mean "on computers running Microsoft Windows."

      ok, 'almost' everywhere.

      it's surprises me that apple, the pinnacle of supercool software (tm), lacks it's own office productivity toolset and needs to resort to ms office, it doesn't surprise me that much that it doesn't work but what's quite hilarious is that the proposed (in this tread) alternative is libreoffice. as roy zimmerman put it: 'sometimes satire writes itself'.

      my prayers and best wishes for those poor mistreated mac users

    10. Re:Genuine Quality by jcr · · Score: 1

      You blame Microsoft?

      They are rather notorious for not following the developer guidelines and painting themselves into corners.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:Genuine Quality by jcr · · Score: 1

      lacks it's own office productivity toolset

      Nope. They have a superior set of productivity apps, which they just don't market very well.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:Genuine Quality by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about that. I have Keynote and PowerPoint installed (and OpenOffice and LibreOffice). For lectures, I still prefer Beamer (including syntax highlighted code snippets in anything else is painful), but Keynote has nothing like the SmartArt feature of PowerPoint, which makes drawing figures a lot easier. It also doesn't have as useful guides and makes it harder to produce useful templates. These days, I generally use PowerPoint for short presentations (though for some things I find the results of Sozi much more effective than anything else for a lot of things. It's still very new and unpolished though).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re: Genuine Quality by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      Why do you people work such shitty jobs for megacorps? Makes sense if you're in a startup where you might hit the jackpot, but Microsoft?

    14. Re: Genuine Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming wrong that we got vacation time. I worked there for more than a decade and was never able to take a full week off.

      You people are fucking pathetic. Get a life. You're making office productivity software, not finding a cure for cancer. What you're doing is not that important.

  7. What the fuck? El Capitan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bad enough I have Yosemite. This steaming pile of shit basically ruined my laptop.

    1. Re: What the fuck? El Capitan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post what laptop you have. If it's a 2009 then yea it probably makes it slower. Anything from the 2010-* run quite well. I have a 2009 Mac mini that runs Yosemite pretty good. Not as good as my 2012 MacBook Pro i7. But that's because it's newer and much more powerful.

      So yea news at 11. Old laptops don't run new stuff as good as new laptops. Call the reporters asap captain obvious.

  8. Not just MS Office by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I got a notice from Native Instruments warning against upgrading to El Capitan, as a number of their products don't work with it either. Apparently something about the sound driver model was changed. The result of trying isn't just failure, but complete kernel panics.

    Is the typical OS X upgrade this perilous? I don't recall hearing warnings like this before.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the iOS-ification of OS X. They're changing the driver model and moving to a "rootless" model where the root account still exists but no longer has access to everything. There is now a list of files you can't change on OS X - at all. This includes the entirety of /bin and /usr, OS X specific things like /System, and random other things like /Applications/Photos.app.

      What this means is that people who create third party utilities that hook into OS X via non-Apple-approved ways can no longer do so in El Capitan, and the user has no way to "jailbreak" their Mac to allow them anyway. (That's not entirely true, there is still a method to disable this new iOS-style lockdown, but it involves booting off El Capitan install media. Which Apple doesn't distribute.)

      This new locked-down OS X is just the start of forcing all apps to go through the App Store and it's the cause of this Office bug and pretty much every other problem people are having with El Capitan. Since El Capitan offers basically no user visible changes (just backend ones like locking down your own computer from you), there's literally no reason to "upgrade." Basically, Apple pulled a Windows 10.

    2. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You say that like it's a bad thing. Reason: when the inevitable privilege escalation bug happens grandma won't get her Mac compromised (Microsoft should take a big, huge, hunking hint here).

      If you're a developer: boot into recovery mode, terminal, "csrutil disable", reboot. Voila, root is back, end of story.

    3. Re:Not just MS Office by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

      I have not seen this as a problem. /usr/local/bin is still accessible, why would you modify /bin? Homebrew made changes in /usr/local/bin so I know that is available. Why would you just not put your "changes" in another directory and put it first in your PATH?

      It does not require that apps go through the app store, the vast majority of my applications are installed from other sources. The "hardening" that they are doing is similar to selinux etc. where their is fine grained hardening of files you should not need to modify -- because of a number of potential attacks that have been cropping up recently.

    4. Re:Not just MS Office by CraigCruden · · Score: 1, Informative

      Native Instruments problem sounds like it was their (Native Instruments) drivers....

      The fact that it has been in public beta for 3 months and now all of a sudden they realize there might be an issue is just negligence on their part.

      For me, the update has been smooth and all 40 applications work fine. The only issue I have had is the configuration for background on 2 of my many monitors keeps going back to default on boot :p

    5. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Restart your Mac.
      Before OS X starts up, hold down Command-R and keep it held down until you see an Apple icon and a progress bar. Release. This boots you into Recovery.
      From the Utilities menu, select Terminal.
      At the prompt type exactly the following and then press Return: csrutil disable
      Terminal should display a message that SIP was disabled.
      From the menu, select Restart.

      System Integrity Protector is now disabled.

    6. Re:Not just MS Office by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      What about steam? adobe apps?

      Now if M$ did something like this it will be antitrust.

    7. Re:Not just MS Office by michael_cain · · Score: 1

      Since El Capitan offers basically no user visible changes (just backend ones like locking down your own computer from you), there's literally no reason to "upgrade."

      It at least "feels" like they've done something good with the scheduler and/or memory management. Switching between windows and tasks when the processors are all saturated is much smoother.

    8. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not true. You can disable rootless without install media. You boot from the recovery partition and do it from there. It's simple if you are so inclined. Anyone can do it.

    9. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Basically, Apple pulled a Windows 10.

      Windows 10 doesn't force users to purchase apps from the Microsoft app store. You can still install and run whatever programs you want from whatever third parties you want. I have lots of open source software running on my Windows 10 system, all downloaded and installed from non-Microsoft sources and all of it is working perfectly.

    10. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm going to sound like macs4all here (but I have no Apple stock, and really don't have a "dog in this hunt")... so devil's advocate time:

      The de facto UNIX standard since the SunOS 4.x days was to put non-OS stuff in /usr/local or possibly /opt. For something that isn't requiring a .kext module, this isn't an issue. For stuff that requires it, you can throw a master switch on dev machines, and use proper Apple signing once it is ready to ship.

      This isn't "jailbreaking". It is a good way to keep the bad stuff out of where it should not belong, because OS X is now on the bad guys' menu (mainly because people moved from Windows 8 to OS X instead of W10.)

      There is no "jailbreaking" involved here. On Linux, I have to use a command to kill SELinux if I want unfettered access. It just takes one command and a reboot. Plus, few users are going to be in /System anyway.

      I personally think Apple needs to go one step further and do like Solaris, where things are role based, and root is a role... not a default user.

      Has Apple pulled a Windows 10? Nope. They are not selling your telemetry data and riffling through your documents. Siri is off until you explicitly turn it on, similar with debug info and app crash stuff.

    11. Re:Not just MS Office by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Is the typical OS X upgrade this perilous?

      Yes. Typically after an OSX upgrade, I go through my applications folder, removing things that no longer work.
      It was fine until around OSX 1.5, but since then, I've lost something on every upgrade. I figured that would have to end sooner or later, but I guess not.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Not just MS Office by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      "and the user has no way to "jailbreak" their Mac to allow them anyway."

      Make things up much? Just Boot into recovery mode, start a terminal, type csrutil disable then reboot.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Not just MS Office by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      To reprhase an old anti-MS quote:

      "OSX ain't done, till no non-appstore programs will run."

    14. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OS X doesn't force users to purchase apps from the Mac app store. You can still install and run whatever programs you want from whatever third parties you want. I have lots of open source software running on my OS X system, all downloaded and installed from non-Apple sources and all of it is working perfectly.

    15. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did. A long time ago. It's called System File Protection as I recall. I'm a Linux user and I know this.

    16. Re:Not just MS Office by armanox · · Score: 1

      I doubt that Steam is hit by this - Steam doesn't modify system files. (I can't test this for myself though, my MBP is stuck on 10.6...)

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    17. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not the same thing at all. NTFS doesn't support enough fine-grained permissions to make this air-tight like the OP is talking about. Much more security than on Windows if an escalation happens (on par with SELinux).

    18. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yes, it fucking well is a bad thing. Moving away from user-controlled general purpose computers is NOT an appropriate response to Grandma getting a virus.

    19. Re: Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a great response. Hard core users still have command line tools to change the permission set intentionally. Casual users, like grandma, have a system which is safe and useful.

    20. Re:Not just MS Office by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

      I have around 15 app store applications and 40 not from the app store - and they ALL run....

    21. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only Native Instruments. Steinberg (Cubase) also advise against updating.

      To be honest - There seem to be problems with Windows 10 too...

    22. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Air-tight security"... that is so funny.

    23. Re:Not just MS Office by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      and the user has no way to "jailbreak" their Mac to allow them anyway. (That's not entirely true, there is still a method to disable this new iOS-style lockdown, but it involves booting off El Capitan install media. Which Apple doesn't distribute.)

      Bullshit. Boot into recovery mode (from the recovery partition that the installer creates by default) and disable System Integrity Protection, and it's gone.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Not just MS Office by iampiti · · Score: 1

      It does not, but certainly it wouldn't surprise me if that comes to pass in the next release. Microsoft has done so many things to Windows (most of them decidedly anti consumer) I never thought that could happen that this one wouldn't surprise me at all.
      I fear the day will come where users will be prevented from doing many things now take for granted on our own computers for "our own good" or some stupid excuse.

    25. Re:Not just MS Office by chihowa · · Score: 1

      The fact that it has been in public beta for 3 months and now all of a sudden they realize there might be an issue is just negligence on their part.

      Yeah, I'm not a big fan of for-pay app developers (on any platform) who find out that their programs don't work on a new OS version at the same time as their customers. Nearly every platform offers API documentation and betas of their new OS versions well in advance of the actual release.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    26. Re:Not just MS Office by jazzis · · Score: 1

      Also Finale and Sibelius are crying since they are a bunch of lazy ass bastards!

    27. Re:Not just MS Office by bogie · · Score: 1

      There is a strong chance that the next version of OS X won't allow you to do that. So he's not that far off.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    28. Re:Not just MS Office by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      maybe not today but as apple pushes for more app store like lock down / sand boxing they may be cut off.

    29. Re:Not just MS Office by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Here's the specific notice I mentioned,, and they do have beta drivers for the hardware, but not yet for this:

      Validation of AU (Audio Units) Plug-ins Fails in Logic Pro X

      All Native Instruments Audio Units plug-ins will not pass the AU validation and therefore will not be available in Logic Pro X under OS X 10.11. The root cause of this issue has been identified and a workaround is still being developed in close contact with Apple. We will keep you updated on any developments regarding this issue.

      I cannot confirm or deny anything, I'm a humble Windows user and the only NI product I use is Kontakt.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    30. Re:Not just MS Office by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I read "Many users have surmised that new restrictions in file permissions in El Capitan" and my first thought was that there is now roughly zero chance that Adobe will ever fix the anomalous problem of Lightroom claiming that it can't properly delete files.

    31. Re:Not just MS Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a strong chance that the next version of OS X won't allow you to do that. So he's not that far off.

      Well, there's also a chance that the next version of Linux won't allow you to do that. And I'm as close as he is.

  9. Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 > 2011 by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just upgraded to El Capitan last night.

    Problem (1): I found out very quickly that root has been neutered; you can't make any changes to "system" files (in this case, meaning files that were included in the OS distribution, including things like the Mail.app folder or binaries, etc.). You get a message about not having permission, despite being root, and without any extended attributes being set on the files. Turns out that El Capitan uses a new "rootless" model in which root is no longer root and many parts of the system are off limits to any human user. Solution: Boot into recovery mode, start a terminal, and enter the command "csrutil disable" then reboot. You'll get root back and will be able to change files again.

    Problem (2): Parts of Office 2011 didn't work at all—just beach balled upon startup. I tried to figure this out for a while but didn't see anyone else talking about solutions online, so I installed Office Mac 2016 (since I'm already paying for Office 365 anyway so that I can use it on my tablet and phone). I've been using the Office Mac 2016 applications all day (Outlook, Word, and Excel for work) heavily, without any trouble, so as a data sample of one I can say that in my case, 2016 is definitely a better bet on El Capitan than 2011, since Word and Outlook 2011 didn't work at all.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  10. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

    Why are you trying to modify Mail.app or other system files? Files in etc are modifiable - including hosts, fstab etc.

  11. Got Office 2016 on Yosemite by cigarky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not having any problems. I like the new layout and appearance much better than 2011. Email is going out without a problem.

    --
    You shank my Jengaship!
    1. Re:Got Office 2016 on Yosemite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Email is going out without a problem.
      Oh, great. Something obvious works! Seems they did a really good job this time at microsoft.

  12. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    Because I keep my Applications folder lean and uncluttered and I never use Mail.app, as one example, so I want it gone from sight.

    My prerogative as the ower of the system, I'd say.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  13. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOSTS!

  14. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

    hosts is modifiable - it is in /etc. I have already modified files there....

  15. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by thermidor · · Score: 1

    Just tried my Office 2011 install under El Cap, having slightly panicked at your post, and have had no problems at all, thank goodness.

  16. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    The later versions however may have problems. We were told by IT at work that they were going to roll out Office 2016 and that we needed to upgrade to Yosemite or it wouldn't work.

    Enterprise people tend to always want the latest Office despite it never having any new features that anyone needs.

  17. Re: Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're holding it wrong. In the new iOS X model you're supposed to press the Home button and navigate the springboard, not look in /Applications.

    What do you mean "your Mac?" It's clearly Steve Jobs (c/o Tim Cook)'s Mac.

    Man I wish I were joking.

  18. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem is Faisal Jeelani

  19. lesson learned by xombo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've had so much trouble with Apple updates in the last couple years. I ended up stopping doing upgrades, completely. I'm still on Mavericks and iOS 7 and will remain here until these machines fall to pieces, at which point I'm just going to order something cheap on Alibaba and stick Linux on it. The whole point of buying these overpriced products is that they're supposed to "Just work." They just don't live up to the promise, anymore. Apple is looking more like Microsoft each day.

    1. Re:lesson learned by gnupun · · Score: 0

      The purpose of updates is to slow your machine down, so you that you will buy a brand new one. If the OS is eating a good amount of CPU processing power and RAM for every update, without any perceivable benefits, what's the point of hardware upgrades with their miniscule increase in app performance?

      OSes are a very mature technology... stop releasing new versions every year or so.

    2. Re:lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      El Capitan is faster than previous versions, though. *mind blown*

    3. Re:lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Apple software is well-marketed crap. You'd think they've have a clue how to make their software just work with their own hardware. Apparently not. Support? Heck no, just upgrade yet again. Hate hate hate proprietary software.

    4. Re:lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple shill spotted.

    5. Re:lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who posts "the purpose of updates is to slow your machine down" is cool, but the guy who posts a factual statement (El Cap has a lot faster UI rendering due to the use of the new Metal frameworks, big improvements in app launch times, etc.) is a shill.

      Uh huh.

    6. Re:lesson learned by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I learned to always wait for the .1 some time ago. 10.4 had a really nasty bug where, if you used File Vault (home directories were encrypted disk images), everything went fine. You could continue using the system and there were no problems. Until after the first reboot (which is something that typically happens less than once a month). At which point, the OS would be unable to mount your home directory and would give you a new, empty, one. The encrypted disk image containing your home directory was completely unusable. It later transpired that 10.3 could still mount it, so if you had an old bootable image around you could restore the data, but it caused a lot of pain. Apparently no one on Apple's QA team was using File Vault...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:lesson learned by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. For a while now, every update has made things worse for me, usually having to do with my multi-monitor desktop. If I remember correctly the most functional OS X for me was Snow Leopard, it sort of went downhill from there, but I had been forced to do an update every now and then because I had to use a current version of Xcode. Until Yosemite that is - it became so dysfunctional that I got a separate machine as an Xcode box to run Yosemite (and upgrade to El Capitan when Xcode makes me), and my main machine is staying on Mavericks. Similar, the iPad I actually use myself is still on iOS 7, while the iOS devices used for development are on iOS 9...
      With windows I have some (older) machines running happily on Windows XP and some newer ones on Windows 7. Sure MS gives us some really crappy OS updates from time to time, but they don't FORCE our hand. Windows XP is older than the first "Cheetah" version of OS X, yet it is actually useful for things and quite functional (if it wasn't for the discontinuation of support for it - MS supported it for many, many more years than Apple does - it would still be a good option for many).

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    8. Re:lesson learned by gnupun · · Score: 1

      You mean El Cap is faster than the brand new core unoptimized "Yosemite" OS? Is El Cap faster than mountain lion or snow leopard? I doubt it. It's so easy to optimize a new code base.

    9. Re:lesson learned by jazzis · · Score: 1

      The guy who posts "the purpose of updates is to slow your machine down" is cool, but the guy who posts a factual statement (El Cap has a lot faster UI rendering due to the use of the new Metal frameworks, big improvements in app launch times, etc.) is a shill.

      Uh huh.

      Mod up as informative and true as hell!

    10. Re:lesson learned by jazzis · · Score: 1

      You mean El Cap is faster than the brand new core unoptimized "Yosemite" OS? Is El Cap faster than mountain lion or snow leopard? I doubt it. It's so easy to optimize a new code base.

      Yes it is. Get a clue.

    11. Re: lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post the problems you have. I have never had these issues I see people complaining about. The only issue I seen which has affected me was some apps wouldn't run on the new version of OS X. They would be disabled. My 10.8 slowed down my machine a little bit but 10.9 and 10.10 just sped it back up again.

    12. Re:lesson learned by namgge · · Score: 1

      Recent versions of OS X are getting progressively faster by making better use of hardware, particularly the GPU and additional CPU cores, but also by using available memory better. The memory management on Yosemite was notably better than on previous versions. The compilers and performance analysis tools are also improving, which also yields improvements. El Capitan's graphics performance is noticeably better than Yosemite's. I know this because I have two identical machines beside me, with almost adjacent serial numbers, one running Yosemite and one running El Capitan, but otherwise identical (i.e. installed with the same DeployStudio workflow) software installations. And yes, Safari is definitely 'snappier'.

    13. Re:lesson learned by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      10.6 Snow Leopard has an interesting bug where it works until you get a new router that supports IPv6, and you configure it with your old SSID and password. WiFi appears to work... but then it doesn't... and then the whole OS beach-balls... you can't even shutdown and have to hard-power off.

      The solution is to disable WiFi on the router, power on the Mac, go into network prefs and disable IPv6.

      Details here if anyone ever needs it.

    14. Re:lesson learned by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

      El Cap graphics performance improvements are limited to fairly recent computers (Mac Pro 2013 only, though some other lines will be supported for a generation or two back).

      I have a Mac Pro 2008 with two "upgraded" graphics cards from ATI HD 5770s x 2 (from I think the Mac Pro 2012 line) and they are not supported by Metal.... and I don't plan on replacing the cards again.

      Claiming that the new OS is much better performance to someone running Mountain Lion or Snow Leopard is disingenuous since the hardware that they are running are unlikely to see much "performance" benefit from the newer version of the operating system.

  20. It was unstable before that. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Honestly Office on OSX has ALWAYS been a steaming pile of crap. It's one of those MS apps that remind us why Microsoft hates anyone not on windows.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:It was unstable before that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuz Apple has been so generous to people not on Macs?

    2. Re:It was unstable before that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS hates everyone equally: Office on windows is a pita....

      On a side note, office for OSX is fundamentally broken. Or was when I installed it last time. The same installation method as in windows: litter the whole filesystem with files. iWork OTOH is self-contained. You can argue the whole day how and why iWork may be inferior but it works, and doesn't crash...

    3. Re:It was unstable before that. by armanox · · Score: 1

      Well....Apple never claimed to be in the first place. There is very little Apple software that is intended to run on non-Apple computers.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  21. What did you expect from Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is so full of themselves they don't care who or what they break. Hell. They ARE APPLE! The gods of rotten cores. LOL

    1. Re: What did you expect from Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So one Or two apps breaks on apple devices and its apple fault? Get out of here. They had access to beta and the api, they could have prevented this. Stop blaming apple for other vendors mistakes. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of developers do not have this problem with their software.

      Its getting old.

  22. John C. Randolph, we need your input! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling jcr! Calling jcr!

    John, you had some involvement with Apple and OS X, did you not?

    Can you give us your input regarding this matter?

    1. Re:John C. Randolph, we need your input! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Never dealt with Microsoft when I was at Apple. Your guess is as good as mine as to how they botched it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  23. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wait? This is not informative... it's bad advice. Informative would be a solution to work along side the new security features. You know.. that etc folder thingy bopper.

  24. Outlook??? by sunderland56 · · Score: 0

    Wait - it's 2015 - and people are still using Outlook as their mail client? On a Mac, no less?

    1. Re:Outlook??? by Gryle · · Score: 0

      Seconding the part about Macs. I use Outlook at work and while it's not a completely horrid piece of software I don't like it nearly enough to try and port it to another OS.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  25. Office 365 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We too were advised not to upgrade to El Capitan due to MS Office having issues with that release. Instead, we will be upgrading to El Capitan *and* upgrading MS Office to Office 356 which apparently does not have this issue.

    1. Re: Office 365 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. So the yearly/subscription cloud version runs just fine. Coincidence? No I don't think so. They want to keep milking you as long as they can.

  26. advice != information by aussersterne · · Score: 2

    The first thing I wanted after installing El Capitan was information on how to disable rootless mode, not advice about the soundness of this idea. Thankfully, I found an informative post or two by searching Google. Any advice would not have been the information I was looking for.

    And for those that are interested, yes, there is actually a .conf file that controls the rootless mode protections. I forget the path, but if you Google, you'll find it. The catch of course is that you have to disable rootless mode in order to edit it, and each time you want to edit it, which means multiple reboots for each edit.

    Given the fact that I use software from across the 'net on my Mac, much of it not Apple developer signed and some of it development oriented, I figured I'd likely encounter problems along the way by trying to edit the .conf file and would have to keep banging on and editing it over time. And I've been using Macs and Mac OS for years already without rootless mode, so I don't feel too catastrophically ba about not having it now.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:advice != information by phayes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ars covered SIP in detail here including the config file /System/Library/Sandbox/rootless.conf.

      Other than dev tools like dtrace, few well written tools should be impacted. Yeah, some people are going to have to find other ways of doing things than throwing them into /System, /bin, etc.

      Most stuff from across the 'Net isn't installing in SIP protected locations anyway & if they were, they needed to be rewritten.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    2. Re:advice != information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most stuff from across the 'Net isn't installing in SIP protected locations anyway & if they were, they needed to be rewritten.

      Not to mention that hoping that these programs will not go tits up or do worse under a new OS is silly anyway.

  27. Re:No Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title IX.

    Even a 76-year old employee of Apple is still entitled to protections under Title IX.

    DOJ

  28. I never get the (new/lat)est stuff... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... when old stuff still work fine and more stable. Sure, unsupported. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  29. Yosemite Mavericks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I held off on updating to Yosemite because I wasn't too impressed with Mavericks over Mountain Lion and Mavericks was slower.

    I updated recently and Yosemite is way faster than Mavericks.

    The stability and speed of Yosemite give me faith in Apple again, which I had largely lost because of Mavericks was slow compared to Mountain Lion (which I can't and won't tolerate, Windows 7 is never slow.)

    I don't know if the first couple of iterations of Yosemite were as nice as the current one, but Yosemite is a very pleasant surprise over Mavericks.
     
    --- Late Yosemite adopter, wish I had upgraded earlier but Mavericks made me expect updates to be worse (like Windows largely does these days).

  30. Re:Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

    Office 2016 requires Yosemite, it will not install on 10.9 or earlier.

  31. My Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is my office going to be unstable in 2016?
    Or is it only Microsoft's office?
    The title is misleading.

  32. Should have been vetted in beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why is it this stuff never gets vetted in beta testing? I actually think El Capitan is horrible, it looks washed out, the thing looks atrocious and Safari seems to run ragged and hangs with plugin's of any kind installed. As far as Office goes, not sure who to blame. Microsoft or Apple or possibly both have some blame here.
    Just incompetence to push out stuff that breaks stuff this bad. I can see some bugs being found but lately both Apple and Microsoft have been really bad in releasing buggy upgrades to their operating systems. Makes me just want to go back to Mavericks, IOS 8 and Windows 7. At least they all were stable and I liked working with all of them.

  33. El Capitan working smoothly for me. by mssuxorz · · Score: 1

    Nearly every upgrade before El Capitan used to result in something getting messed up on my Macs. This time it was very smooth, and with the exception of one minor upgrade to Little Snitch v3.6, there was absolutely no problem with the video and image editing software I used day in and out. Photoshop, Capture One, Avid media composer, iMovie, Office 2011, VMWare, OpenVPN and a whole bunch of other software I use just work fine. That said, El Cap has still not solved the horrible bluetooth audio stutter issue that's plagued all our macs and bluetooth speakers or headphones for years now.

  34. Use VMWare Fusion and MS Office 365 by jlgreer1 · · Score: 0

    I am still using an old Mac Book Pro with Core i7 quad core processor. I use VMware Fusion running a virtual machine with MS Window 7. It runs MS Office 365 / 2016 without a problem. I would run Office 2016 natively on the Mac but the Mac version does not include MS Access. Jeff

  35. El Capitan Works - but there are some buts by niks42 · · Score: 1

    First off was the failure to boot from cold after the upgrade with a kernel panic. After some searching around, I found some discussion about kext (from SyncMate) that upset El Capitan .. after manually hacking those out from the recovery mode, the machine was back again. It wasn't until today, that I found I couldn't use airplay to display video on the TV using my jailbroken AppleTV 2. Apparently El Capitan insists on a new encryption which is only available when Apple TV is running the latest version of iOS.

    Not happy.

  36. The solution is to download LibreOffice .. by nickweller · · Score: 0
  37. Only Outlook has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, Outlook is the "one" program I have on my computer that is sometimes buggy, and this is a hackintosh no less.

  38. this is progress by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    cause in the old days, people would just tell you how great apple is

    at least now we have an element of realism: apple sucks just like everyone else

    a few years from now...people will recall those horrid power connector plugs, and say, typical apple crappo hardware...

  39. Or from Apple's perspective, mission accomplished by Eric+Green · · Score: 1

    Apple gave fair warning to vendors that they wanted sandboxed applications to be the standard for the platform. Sandboxed applications do not run out of system directories, they are basically "jailed" in their own sandboxes. Microsoft, like most software vendors, ignored Apple. So now the vendors are reaping the rewards of what they sowed.

    The bigger problem with El Capitan lies with virtualization and VPN software. These need to make changes to the system routing and interface tables to properly route packets between virtual machines and the Internet, or between the local host and the other end of a VPN tunnel. El Capitan breaks our VPN at work and I have advised our employees to not upgrade to El Capitan due to this fact until Apple and VPN vendors come up with a solution to this problem. I certainly am not going to advise employees on how to disable Apple's security system (SIP), that would be lunacy on my part akin to telling employees how to disable virus protection on their Windows laptops given the increasing threat level for Macs recently.

    In the end, we need more secure systems, and Apple is providing one. The fact that it breaks existing applications and inconveniences users is unsurprising. It would have been surprising if that *hadn't* happened -- which is one reason why consumer operating systems are so insecure (because making them secure breaks so much stuff).

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  40. Re:Or from Apple's perspective, mission accomplish by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

    I use Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client (Version 3.1.06073 - Copyright 2004 - 2014) and it works with El Capitan..... Based on the copyright not being updated, I don't think this is the latest version either..... and it works fine.... so El Capitan does not "break" all VPN clients....

  41. finger off the button... by mnslinky · · Score: 1

    Downloaded El Capitan last night, haven't pushed the button yet. Manage to use my Macbook Pro in place of the shitty Dell laptop corporate IT pushes on me. This makes Outlook fairly mandatory, but I can use RDP to a Windows machine to resolve it. Better I know now.

    Surprisingly, I've been a fan of MS Office, and have been tickled that Microsoft has offered such great support on the Mac platform. I feel they've (finally) adopted the, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!" crowd. This is great, and I use MS product on my Macs and pay for valid licenses on Windows VMs for when it's needed (Required Windows to write a book (shameless plug here: https://www.packtpub.com/netwo...). Please, Microsoft, keep up the cross-OS/platform support.

  42. Haterade Distortion Field by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    The whole point of buying these overpriced products is that they're supposed to "Just work." They just don't live up to the promise, anymore. Apple is looking more like Microsoft each day.

    You mean they're supposed to be flawless, because Apple, because reasons. Five people out of five million purchases report a problem with an Apple product, and Tim Cook better be calling Kerry Washington because they've got a scaaandal on their hands.

    Think that's hyperbole? At the height of Bendghazi, Apple had reports from a total of 6 users on their iPhone screens bending. Whereas the Samsung Galaxy cracked, rather than bended, at the same pressure but there was no whining at Samsung.

    Then, of course, there's don't hold it wrong.

    1. Re:Haterade Distortion Field by xombo · · Score: 1

      Out of every Apple product I've bought since around 2012, all but one has had to go back to the Apple store for serious service or replacement. That's multiple iPods, iPads, iPhones, MacBook Airs, and iMacs affected. Luckily Apple replaced them within the warranty period, but if that's the level of hardware quality I can expect from now on I think I'll just buy some cheap shit off AliBaba that won't make me feel like my wallet was just torpedoed when the device falls apart.

  43. Re: Rootless is a problem, and Office 2016 2011 by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Man I wish I were joking.

    Nah, not joking. Trolling.

  44. csrutil disable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boot into recovery, open terminal, csrutil disable, reboot