Slashdot Mirror


How Steve Jobs Outsmarted Carly Fiorina

HughPickens.com writes: Carly Fiorina likes to boast about her friendship with Apple founder Steve Jobs but Fortune Magazine reports that it turns out Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader. In January 2004, Steve Jobs and Carly Fiorina cut a deal where HP could slap its name on Apple's wildly successful iPod and sell it through HP retail channels but HP still managed to botch things up. The MP3 player worked just like a regular iPod, but it had HP's logo on the back and in return HP agreed to continue pre-loading iTunes onto its PCs. According to Steven Levy soon after the deal with HP was inked, Apple upgraded the iPod, making HP's version outdated and because of Fiorina's deal HP was banned from selling its own music player until August 2006. "This was a highly strategic move to block HP/Compaq from installing Windows Media Store on their PCs," says one Apple source. "We wanted iTunes Music store to be a definitive winner. Steve only did this deal because of that."

In short, Fiorina's "good friend" Steve Jobs blithely mugged her and HP's shareholders. By getting Fiorina to adopt the iPod as HP's music player, Jobs had effectively gotten his software installed on millions of computers for free, stifled his main competitor, and gotten a company that prided itself on invention to declare that Apple was a superior inventor.

64 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader

    Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?

  2. weakly disguised hit-piece by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aside from the incomprehensibility of "...it turns out Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader.." anyone else find it curious that we suddenly see a deal between HP and Apple (that allowed a downward-trending computer mfg company to tie itself to the "big up and comer") spun as "Jobs OUTFOXED Fiorina"?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering she's running for president, it shouldn't be surprising at all that her record gets raked over with a fine-toothed comb.

      As for the deal itself, it definitely sounds like HP tried to gain advantage, but Apple came out as the clear winner, with HP (and Fiorinia) looking entirely foolish. Given the rest of her tenure at HP (and elsewhere), I'm not surprised in the least to hear it. She's never been any sort of true visionary, and having Jobs leave her in the dust with having doubled down on what was soon to be yesterday's technology, while he focused on what was really key is exactly what I would expect.

      So is it really a "hit piece" to tell what happened, and put it in proper context? Why was HP wasting its time doing things like buying Compaq, and trying to piggyback on Apple's successes? If she was really a visionary, shouldn't she have been leading the market and innovating the way Jobs was?

    2. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You may not be aware of this, but Fiorina has been citing Jobs to deflect criticism of her for being fired by HP's board. She says that after she was fired he called her up and said "been there!" She's implying that because Jobs was fired and came back even stronger, her being fired from HP is proof she's a genius just like Jobs.

      Since she brought up Jobs to make herself look good, it was inevitable that Jobs would be used to make her look bad. She opened that door.

    3. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think this comment is a weakly disguised hit piece on this article.

    4. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by kaizendojo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fiorina couldn't lead lemmings to a cliff. Given the two bad alternatives, I'd have to choose Trump.

    5. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Sometimes corporate executives just make stupid mistakes and sometimes corporate executives are paid to make stupid mistakes by their competitors. There a billions of dollars hidden in secret accounts in tax havens with millions shifting from account to account all of the time.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Time for Putin to pull the wool over her eyes if by some fluke she becomes president.
      "We're allowed to put our American flag logo on the back of all Russian missiles fired in Syria."

    7. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      HP made a *really* stupid agreement. It wasn't the only one, and at least this one was legal, but it sure doesn't make Fionna look good. She'd have been better off to not cause this idiocy to be brought back to light.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by hirschma · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, she was outfoxed.

      The PJB-100, the first disk-based MP3 player, was in my hands in 1999 - a full two years before the iPod. HP owned fundamental patents that could have taxed each unit that Apple sold - but seemed to be entirely unaware of that ownership.

      Instead, they paid Apple to resell their own inventions. Brilliant!

      So yeah, she just totally sucked.

    9. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      "Aside from the incomprehensibility of "...it turns out Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader.." anyone else find it curious that we suddenly see a deal between HP and Apple (that allowed a downward-trending computer mfg company to tie itself to the "big up and comer") spun as "Jobs OUTFOXED Fiorina"?"

      No, because we read the rest of the summary, where it quite clearly explains how Jobs screwed her. You should try it sometime! (Not screwing her. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. I mean reading the whole summary before posting something so stupid)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by cas2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that the rest of the Republican candidates seem to be experts at leading lemmings off cliffs, I'd say that was a point in her favour.

    11. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you know, vote for the decent alternative, Bernie Sanders (even if you disagree with his politics you have to admit the man is objectively a decent human being such rare, much weird, wow)

      captcha: Decoys

    12. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Solandri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So is it really a "hit piece" to tell what happened, and put it in proper context?

      The facts may be right, but the context it presents seems suspect. AFAIK HP never made its own MP3 player. If the presented context were correct, HP would've made one as soon as their contractual prohibition with Apple expired in 2006. That doesn't seem to have happened.

      So the proper context is probably that HP didn't want to make an MP3 player, but they wanted to keep their name recognition up in the MP3 player market just in case they were wrong and it took off. So they inked a deal with the most successful MP3 player maker. And they tricked Jobs into giving additional concessions by agreeing not to build their own MP3 player - something they weren't planning on doing anyway.

      If that's what happened, in retrospect HP did the smart thing. The MP3 player market died when phones picked up music playback capability. So HP came out ahead by never devoting resources to developing an MP3 player. Of course they totally missed the boat on smartphones, even though they used to be one of the leaders in the PDA market.

    13. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To call a man decent because he admits that he wants to steal everything you own, is missing the point.

      Since when did Bernie Sanders become a Capitalist?

    14. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd pick Trump too, in the same way that I would choose to drink bleach rather than ammonia or nitric acid.

      As for the Democrats, right now it seems like a choice between Dr. Pepper and Coke Zero.

    15. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      socialism: public safety nets. much cheaper and higher quality healthcare. affordable higher education. source: canada, denmark, germany, norway, etc... countries richer, healthier, happier, better educated, and *freer* than the usa: no financial parasites funneling money out of their society via cozy relationships paid for by corrupt elections, for nothing in return, because regulating corporations and plutocrats is "against freedom"

      communism: gulags and mass starvation and no free speech and no free press and no freedom of religion and control and fear and genocide and hour long lines to get scratchy toilet paper. that's canada and germany, right?

      american moron: socialism = communism, because hysterical low iq propaganda that hasn't had an original thought since mccarthy's 1950s red scare bullshit means that binary choices between communism and capitalism are the only choices in a subject matter, economics, that in reality, has thousands of complex variations. but... we'll just stick to our ignorant kneejerk biases, because it serves our plutocrat masters who produce the propaganda to keep us misinformed, poor and unhealthy, and we like it because we're useful fools

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    16. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by unixisc · · Score: 2

      You forgot his leadership of a company called NEXT, where he came out w/ one of the most intuitive UNIX-like workstations of the time. If that wasn't innovative, I have no idea what is

    17. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      your healthcare system costs 100-1,000x less than ours does and you live longer with a higher quality of life

      your higher education is so cheap, you'll even take americans for free if they do good on their exams, no need to even learn german

      http://www.bbc.com/news/magazi...

      of course germany has problems, every nation does, you're an idiot if you think i was describing germany as some sort of paradise

      but from this side of the pond, germany is clearly and unequivocally doing better on the issue of social safety nets, for which us americans are paying many multiples of, for far less benefit, because morons here think it's a free market, and plutocrats corrupt our elected officials to keep thew gravy train flowing

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    18. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jobs got booted and went on to outdo Apple sufficently that they ended up buying him back and more or less gutting their own products to rebuild them around his.

      Not really. Jobs got booted and went on to meander around aimlessly in computing. His success was with Pixar, not with NeXT. The only reason NeXTStep was superior to Apple's other options is that they had been dicking around incompetently with a variety of OS projects which never went anywhere. It's also not clear that NeXTStep was actually a better option than BeOS, but it's cleat that Jobs and NeXT were a package deal, and the rest is history.

      The fact that NeXTStep, an overpriced and antiquated wacky Unix variant based around a development system and language nobody wanted to use at the time was superior to MacOS of the day is a testament to how aimless and pointless Apple was without Jobs, not to the quality (or success) of NeXTStep.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:weakly disguised hit-piece by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been repeatedly demonstrated that it wasn't, in fact. It was just a better effort than similar devices which preceded it.

      Right, but not innovation. That's not what this is about.

      Oh please. I hate to defend Apple of all companies, but "innovation" is not being the first to come up with the very first version of something, that's "invention". The two are not the same. Putting together existing parts (and refining them significantly) into a new overall package is innovation; it's really the same thing as engineering, but also combined with design.

      I still remember when the iPhone first came out. It was truly intuitive and easy to use for people who hadn't used one before, and it was actually attractive; this just wasn't true for preceding devices with their tiny screens with resistive touchscreens and crappy OSes. Thankfully, Android came along later (though it has major problems too, namely mfgrs abandoning devices quickly), but I have to give credit where it's due. The iPhone is the whole reason everyone has a smartphone now; no one cared about them before because they really weren't easy to use (nor attractive).

    20. Re: weakly disguised hit-piece by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      you want to give the benefit of the doubt. it is mostly stupid people out there. nine times out of ten, they genuinely don't understand what the fuck they are talking about but open their mouths anyway

      if i am having a conversation here with mostly europeans, and the difference is therefore in terminology (there are dumb europeans as well as dumb americans, but the terminology differences means indeed i have to side with caution), then i apologize

      but if i am talking to the usual low iq propagandized american retard on this topic, there is no apology necessary

      i am not using empty insults. we are talking about, objectively, morons. who talk about economic concepts they don't understand, merely regurgitating quasireligous beliefs their propaganda channels spoonfeed to the useful fools. genuine morons

      do you respect a creationist when talking about evolution? an antivaxxer when talking about biology? no and no. these people need to be castigated and rejected. they reject reason so there is no use arguing with them. so it is with free market fundamentalist retards. they have beliefs that only exist when ignoring economics and simple history

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  3. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader

    Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?

    "Why do you even of things anymore, timothy?".

    Fixed that for you.

  4. I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so much by laserhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    on Windows.

  5. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always took a full week of vacation off when I worked there.

    Is this what USasians think is a generous vacation policy? You're seriously impressed about being able to take a whole week of vacation?!? LOL.

  6. She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I honestly wouldn't vote for her for that reason alone.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What was the Corvalis Group going to do? Keep making really nice but rather expensive, calculators for an ever dwindling market? It's not a sustainable product line that could scale today to be anything but a nostalgia product. Besides which, the HP calculators have a high enough build quality that if you really need one you can track one down used for a price that is about the same as you'd pay, inflation adjusted, for a new one. There's nothing new to be added. Your HP-41, 48, or 15 is out there to acquire if you need it, for the few who want one.

    2. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      What was the Corvalis Group going to do? Keep making really nice but rather expensive, calculators for an ever dwindling market?

      Make them really nice but less expensive.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 2

      That's what I did. I bought 2 extra 48G's and they are sitting in plastic bags with silica gel in my safe. I use my primary every day for the unit conversion feature alone. It is a great tool I bought in 1993. It would be even better with a better screen and faster processor.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    4. Re: She killed the calculator group. Never forget! by trout007 · · Score: 2

      If you ever used a 48 with their unit system you wouldn't say that. Nothing is as fast or capable anywhere. As long as units were the same dimensions you could add them in the stack. 3 N*mm + 30 oz*in? No problem it's a couple of button presses.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  7. Re: I still don't understand why iTunes sucks so m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It ran through an OSX emulation layer, that was half baked.

  8. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

    Oops, that seems to be the model that HP sold. But the 4th Gen "Photo" came out on October 26, 2004. That may be the model that is being referenced.

  9. Big Whoop by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    A three-legged cat could out-fox Carly Fiorina.

    http://www.politico.com/magazi...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:What new version of the iPod? by Desler · · Score: 3

    This one.

    The iPod Photo is a portable media player designed and marketed by Apple Inc. It was the top-of-the-line model in Apple's iPod family. It was positioned as a premium higher-end spin-off of the fourth-generation iPod on October 26, 2004.

  11. Motorola by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was a deal with Motorola too, to put a music player on a phone, which was limited to 100 songs or something. At the time I thought Apple came out ahead on that one.

  12. I don't see how this hurt HP by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    HP didn't want to enter the music player gizmo biz, otherwise they wouldn't do the iPod deal to begin with. And not having Microsoft's music spam-ware on HP's PC's didn't hurt HP, it hurt Microsoft.

    The only way it would hurt HP is if MS was contractually locked out from bribing HP to put the MS spam-ware on the HP PC's. But we don't know how much MS was willing to pay.

  13. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by Narcocide · · Score: 4, Informative

    I KNOW! If you tell these guys what minimum mandated vacation time looks like in France they flat out think you're lying.

  14. sad by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that these candidates are the best that we as a country can muster is pretty pathetic. I know we have really thoughtful and intelligent people in this country, but for whatever reason, they don't seem to be able (or want) to compete with the horribly inept batch of clowns that we inevitably get.

    America is basically like a very badly run company (e.g. like HP). The mediocre rise to the top. Actually Carly seems exactly like the sort of president we deserve. She can speak well enough to disguise the fact that what she is saying is completely retarded. Compare this skillset to Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, and Trump, and it makes her look like a teacher in a room full of shitty kids.

    1. Re:sad by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      I know we have really thoughtful and intelligent people in this country, but for whatever reason, they don't seem to be able (or want) to compete with the horribly inept batch of clowns that we inevitably get.

      What smart person wants to be blamed for every bad decision that other people make, every bad outcome no matter how much planning went into something, arguing with the "Pepsi" people who just don't want to agree with something from "Team Coke", owe this one a favor for lending support of a bill of theirs that inevitably means putting your name on something you don't actually support, make decisions that will affect thousands of lives in ways that couldn't possibly be foreseen (in some cases literally condemning some to die), and spend a billion dollars to do it?

      Being the president is a crappy job, and every smart person realizes that.

  15. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Powerful you have become. The Timothy I sense in you.

  16. If you're gonna get screwed, get screwed by a pro by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno. If I had to choose between negotiating with Steve Jobs or Vladimir Putin, I think I'd pick Putin as the safer choice.

  17. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally believe that the Timothy are unable to do so because, uh, some, uh, people out there in our nation don't have spellcheck and, uh, I believe that our education like such as in South Africa and, uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and, I believe that they should, our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S., uh, or, uh, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries, so we will be able to build up our future for our children.

    --
    The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
  18. Because 2016 elections... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Thus gossip about a stuuuuupid presidential candidate's former business deal (from 2004) with an asshole who's been dead since 2011 - is suddenly click-worthy "news".

    In other news... Pangea broke up. Suck it.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Because 2016 elections... by lucm · · Score: 2

      It's the flaw that allows Democrats to fool Republicans

      Except Bush. He can't get fooled again.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Because 2016 elections... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fiorina's not stupid.

      Stupid? Maybe not. Incompetent? Hell, yeah. Just ask anyone who worked at Lucent, HP or Compaq.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Because 2016 elections... by serbanp · · Score: 2

      Reunite Gondwana! Petition is now open.

    4. Re:Because 2016 elections... by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thus gossip about a stuuuuupid presidential candidate's former business deal (from 2004) with an asshole who's been dead since 2011 - is suddenly click-worthy "news".

      A presidential candidate's demonstrated incompetence in a leadership position is "stuff that matters". So is major corporate executive's, since it helps dispell the lingering idea that leaders get paid more than underlings because they're worth more, rather than just more powerful. The remains of the myth of the divinely appointed kings are hindering our democracies by making the decision-making positions extremely attractive to psychopaths, narcissists and people with other mental issues, and need to die.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Because 2016 elections... by denzacar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A presidential candidate's demonstrated incompetence in a leadership position is "stuff that matters". So is major corporate executive's, since it helps dispell the lingering idea that leaders get paid more than underlings because they're worth more, rather than just more powerful. The remains of the myth of the divinely appointed kings are hindering our democracies by making the decision-making positions extremely attractive to psychopaths, narcissists and people with other mental issues, and need to die.

      One - incompetence has NEVER stopped anyone getting elected.
      Nobody cares about incompetence. Neither the people at the voting booth NOR the people in the party pushing that person for office.
      People care about "Is he/she like me?". Can they identify with the candidate and his/her ideas or in other words - do they LIKE the candidate.
      It's a popularity contest.

      Just a while ago US had an incompetent lunatic with a history of substance abuse problem who believes he talks to god, with god giving him instructions on how to run the country - running the country and starting decades long wars.
      Remember that time when an undiagnosed Alzheimer's patient ran a country, with plans to "win" a nuclear war with USSR by using "lazors"?
      Remember that airhead from Alaska being and actual presidential candidate?
      Remember that other guy being "a robot" and "not cool" to be president?
      Remember that certain senator from Kansas being "too old"?

      It's a popularity contest. People vote for whom they like more based on their public image.
      Hint: A sex scandal does not mean someone is incompetent at their job - except in politics.
      People don't care about competence. If they did, there'd be a test and an "experience in office" requirement for political positions.
      You know... something to show that a politician actually knows how government works.
      Imagine THAT crazy thing - politicians with actual governing GRADES and stats.

      Instead, elections are about the ability to pretend to be everything to everyone.
      Which is what's "making the decision-making positions extremely attractive to psychopaths, narcissists and people with other mental issues" - not a myth of divine kings.

      Thus, elections being a popularity contest...
      "Jobs fucked Fiorina" is irrelevant historical information (over a decade old) which, were elections about competence, would actually indicate more that she was a high stakes player who once lost to Divine Steve.
      But it's not.
      It's a cheap, "dirty laundry" attempt at painting old news as relevant in order to affect someone's popularity by labeling them as "totally tricked" and "outsmarted" instead of what they are - incompetent at running a company.

      Which might actually mean that she has great chances - in politics.
      After all... People loved that other MBA who kept ruining businesses he ran. Maybe she should get herself a baseball team?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. Re: What new version of the iPod? by Bartles · · Score: 2

    "Initially, HP only offered the 20 and 40 GB 4th-generation iPods. HP later added the iPod mini, the iPod photo, and the iPod shuffle to the lineup.[4] Thanks to HP's distribution network, the iPod+HP was sold in retailers where Apple did not have any presence at the time, which included Wal-Mart, RadioShack, and Office Depot. Many of these retailers now sell Apple iPods."

    From Wikipedia

  20. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by nickweller · · Score: 2

    @sexconker: "Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late leader/"

    'Why do you even post things anymore, timothy?'

    I do wonder that myself, especially consider what isn't chosen from Slashdot Recent ..

  21. Re:Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lead by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    This begs the question...

    Did Carly may have outlived of by Apple's late leader?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  22. I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I sure hope neither Fiorina or Trump gets the nomination. And Biden rather than Sanders or Clinton. Dr. Carson seems like a far more capable and thoughtful person. Cruz knows what he's talking about and has actually produced full workable legislation like a federal budget, whereas the other candidates only produced sound bites. There are several options better than Fiorina and Trump.

    1. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Carson is a young-earth creationist and a crackpot. He's definitely not "thoughtful".

      Cruz follows Dominionist Theology and keeps trying to shut the government down.

      I like Sanders, but I'll take Trump any day over these two wackos. Biden would probably be OK too.

    2. Re:I sure hope one of the other ten candidates by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      Carson is a young-earth creationist and a crackpot. He's definitely not "thoughtful".

      Carson is a brilliant surgeon - freaking genius, really. Any other subject and he's as smart as a bag of hammers.

      Cruz follows Dominionist Theology and keeps trying to shut the government down.

      Saw a meme floating around last week....a Canadian, a Cuban, and a white supremacist walk into a bar. Bartender says, 'hello, Senator Cruz'.

      but I'll take Trump any day over these two wackos.

      Who's primary skillset is losing other people's money in bankruptcy court? Why not get Lincoln Chafee to switch back, since he's not overly bloodthirsty or a Christofascist?

      Biden would probably be OK too.

      Eh. Supported the Iraq war, supported the 2006 bankruptcy bill that makes it harder to discharge debt (unless it's for your vacation home), and brags about writing the Patriot Act. Unlike Hillary, he's likable and actually has a personality - but agrees with her on policy.

  23. In case anyone doesn't realize Carly is an idiot.. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2
    Here's what Carly said about Net Neutrality during an interview back in May:

    JOHN FUND: You, at Lucent, and at Hewlett Packard, began at the dawn of the internet era, seeing the possibilities of what that would bring. And here we are, 20 odd years after the World Wide Web, and we've created a marvelous industry, marvelous possibilities. The Obama administration has decided, this can't be left to its own devices, we need Net Neutrality. And even though Congress doesn't want it, and people in both parties in Congress don't want it, and the courts have blocked them consistently, they're moving forward of course with what they call executive action, which I call the divine right of kings. Uh, what do you think about Net Neutrality, and how should we fight it if we should?

    CARLY: Well we should- it's ridiculous. We now have an FCC, deciding on a 3-2 vote, that the Internet will be regulated with 400 pages of legislation. Terrible idea. Terrible idea. Of course, the dirty little secret of that regulation, which is the same dirty little secret of Obamacare or Dodd-Frank or all of these other huge complicated pieces of regulation or legislation, is that they don't get written on their own, they get written in part by lobbyists for big companies who want to understand that the rules are going to work for them. And this is part of what people see. Look, crony capitalism is alive and well. Elizabeth Warren, of course, is wrong about what to do about it. She claims that the way to <airquotes>solve</airquotes> crony capitalism is more complexity, more regulation, more legislation. Worse tax codes. And of course the more complicated government gets- and it's really complicated now- the less the small and the powerless can deal with it. And so the big get bigger, the powerful get more powerful, the wealthy and the well-connected get more wealthy and more well-connected. I mean, that's a fact. It's what's happening. And it's partially why people feel so disconnected. So, the dirty little secret of those 400 pages of legislation in Net Neutrality was, who was in the middle of arguing for net neutrality? Verizon, Comcast, Google, I mean, all these companies were playing. They weren't saying "we don't need this," they were saying "we need it." And so, the only way to level the playing field, so that the small, the new, the entrepreneurial, the powerless, have a shot, is to reduce all this complexity. And meanwhile, while, you know, the big are getting bigger, we're crushing the small. So we're now for the first time in history, we are destroying more businesses than we are creating. We are destroying more businesses than we are creating- it's a terrible statistic. And it means that we're never going to get this economy growing and growing again, yes I had the great privilege of playing uh, important roles in Lucent and Hewlett Packard, but like most people I started out at a little company. I started out as a secretary in a nine-person real estate firm. My husband started out driving a tow truck for a family-owned auto body shop. Most Americans start in little humble businesses, which create 2/3 of the new jobs and employ half the people. So when we're crushing those little businesses, as we are every time we roll out a new, complicated piece of legislation or regulation, we're crushing the possibilities of this economy.

    JOHN FUND: I grew up in Northern California, and part of the ethos was, reading about Hewlett and Packard starting their business in a garage.

    CARLY: A garage. Two guys in a garage. By the way, Google started out that way too, in a dorm room. But they seem to have forgotten that. [audience laughs]

    JOHN FUND: Well, uh, they have new friends in Washington.

    CARLY: Yes, they do. Yes they do.

    The transcript doesn't do it justice at all- her tics and mannerisms while shoveling this horseshit will make you want to smack her upside the head. Carly is a clueless liar- but I have to admit, I can never tell exactly when she's lying and when she's just being clueless.

  24. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    She is gaining momentum in her campaign so we need to do something to slow her down

    Slowing her down isn't necessary on slashdot. While we have a solid conservative majority in the slashdot user base, the overwhelming majority of slashdot conservatives will vote for whoever has the (R) after their name. In november if the ballot says Ghost of Ronald Reagan (D) vs Ficus Tree (R), the Tree will win the slashdot electorate by a landslide.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  25. Carly may have been outfoxed by a rock by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    Carly Fiorina pretty much seemed to be doing all she could to destroy HP. When she bought Compaq she was already thought to be ready to be pushed out the door and many even suggested her main motive in doing so was to get the board to wait and see how that purchase worked out before showing her the door, buying her some more time. And it is worth remembering that the purchase of ailing Compaq brought little or nothing to HP that they didn't already have, and was at a higher price than even what the Chinese bought the IBM PC business for and renamed it Lenovo.

    So the deal with Apple was bad for HP? I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!

    Not that I would consider her malicious. Beyond putting her personal income beyond the needs of HP and all the employees that got laid off, I would say most of what happened under her reign was just due to incompetence.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  26. Re:Sad to see the HP culture disappearing by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Is this what USasians think is a generous vacation policy? You're seriously impressed about being able to take a whole week of vacation?!? LOL.

    No.
    HP used to have a really nice sabbatical program, where you could take a whole year off.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  27. Margaret Sanger DID Belive in Eugenics by Nova+Express · · Score: 2
    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  28. Re: In case anyone doesn't realize Carly is an idi by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Verizon and Comcast were not pushing for Net Neutrality and saying "we need it"; they were the principal forces opposing it, and they were the reason that FCC regulations were required to preserve it in the first place. They had plans for paid prioritization of traffic that would basically amount to charging websites for the privilege of not having their traffic throttled on the "last mile" link between the ISP and its customers. Google was diametrically opposed to this, as well as most small web sites and 3.7 million individuals who sent letters to the FCC.

    The fact that an ex-CEO of HP, of all people, is pontificating about Net Neutrality while exposing her ignorance of even the most basic facts about who was involved and what sides they were on seems incredible. Was she merely confused herself or just trying to confuse everyone else? I have no idea.

  29. Re:"Cruz follows Dominionist Theology" by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Just Google "Cruz dominionist" for lots of links.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Ted-C...
    http://www.politicususa.com/20...

    The last one might be "liberal", but it has a video from Cruz's own father. If that's not good enough for you, I don't know what is.

  30. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by pepty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In november if the ballot says Ghost of Ronald Reagan (D) vs Ficus Tree (R), the Tree will win the slashdot electorate by a landslide.

    Considering how far (R) has shifted to the right since the 80's the party would immediately declare the Ghost of Ronald Reagan to be a Dem. That and declare him satanic.

  31. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering how far (R) has shifted to the right since the 80's the party would immediately declare the Ghost of Ronald Reagan to be a Dem.

    That is logically sound, indeed Reagan is too liberal to be a republican. However one of the unshakable requirements for republicans is to praise him regardless; and they are not bothered by the hypocrisy (indeed they don't even acknowledge it). So while they should throw him out for being too liberal, they would be unable to bring themselves to do so.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  32. Re: Carly may have outfoxed of by Apple's late lea by Uberbah · · Score: 2

    That is logically sound, indeed Reagan is too liberal to be a republican.

    Hell, these days, he's too liberal to be a democrat. Started prosecutions of bankers when Obama bailed out the banks for a fraud dozens of times as large as the S&N crisis. Insisted that Social Security had nothing to do with the deficit - tell that to Obama's Catfood Commission. Withdrew from Grenada and Lebanon (though he never should have gone in in the first place), whereas Obama has made plans to continue the occupation of Afghanistan through two terms of his successor, whoever they turn out to be.