Slashdot Mirror


Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Deal Is Reached

An anonymous reader writes: The NY Times reports that negotiators have finally reached agreement over the Trans-Pacific Partnership from the U.S. and 11 other nations. The TPP has been in development for eight years, and has the potential to dramatically strengthen U.S. economic ties to east Asia. Though the negotiations have been done in secret, the full text of the agreement should be published within a month. Congress (and the legislative houses of the other participating countries) will have 90 days to review it and decide whether to ratify it. The TPP has been criticized in tech circles for how it regards intellectual property and facilitates website blocking, among other issues.

Proponents will also have to answer broader questions about whether it stifles competition, how it treats individuals versus large corporations, as if it creates environmental problems. To give you an idea of how complex it is: "The Office of the United States Trade Representative said the partnership eventually would end more than 18,000 tariffs that the participating countries have placed on United States exports, including autos, machinery, information technology and consumer goods, chemicals and agricultural products ranging from avocados in California to wheat, pork and beef from the Plains states."

27 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Finally by Demotheses · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so excited by this. I love surprises.

    1. Re:Finally by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Informative

      The agreement also would overhaul special tribunals that handle trade disputes between businesses and participating nations.

      Probably something like ISDS. That should hardly be a surprise. It is the new colonialism: it gives companies the possibility to plunder foreign nations, but with an army of lawyers instead of an army of thugs.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  2. We Are Fucked by crunchy_one · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the first thing that came to mind. That, and we are really, really fucked .

    1. Re:We Are Fucked by crunchy_one · · Score: 4, Funny

      This just goes so far beyond bad, all I can think to do is build a blanket fort and retreat to it with a fifth of JD.

    2. Re:We Are Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is all about letting Big Biz (esp Big Pharma) in the USA fuck all the smaller biz into bankruptcy AND letting the US Feds get unfettered access to anything they want.
      The other countries get what out of this exactly?

      The sagebrush is blowing in the wind.

      Soon ann these other counties will look just like identikit USA with a Big Mac whorehouse on every corner etc etc

  3. Congratulations by BlindRobin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are now ever so much more than a mere consumer you are now officially a commodity.

  4. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I honestly don't know. No. Really. I don't know.

    The same thing that has gone wrong with every single trade pact that the US government has ever negotiated: a few get enriched, the rest of us get fewer jobs. Do try to keep up.

  5. And we STILL can't read it by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its full 30-chapter text will not be available for perhaps a month

    Doubtlessly to be released to public 24 hours before the Congressional vote...

    If the reason for keeping it secret is that the negotiators didn't want to be swayed by day-to-day changing public opinion, what reason not to release the text immediately? It's not as if they have to print it all out; I'm sure there's many a web-designer who could whip up a site with the content of the treaty in less than a day.

    Hell, stick it in a TXT file and dump it on an FTP site somewhere. Nominally this agreement is for the betterment of all involved countries; there is no reason not to make the information available immediately.

    Unless... say, you don't think the negotiators weren't working in the best interests of the citizens they are supposed to represent, do you?

    1. Re:And we STILL can't read it by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's because Canada is in the middle of an election, and if the details get out before then, the ruling Conservatives will be completely wiped off the face of the earth.

      It will gut most of Canada's government-run businesses, including our health care system.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:And we STILL can't read it by Moof123 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It gives the players involved time to setup any sort of spin, distraction, press release, leak, or other propaganda to snub the expected protests.

      If you pay attention you can see it in action. Shortly before the Iran deal was announced there were a bunch of stories about amazing bunker buster bombs, which were nothing new, but magically were on the second pages of assorted news sites. Once the deal was announced it was clear to me that it was all nicely orchestrated to either pressure Iran into accepting or else, or to snub those that would argue we would be toothless on the enforcement side (likely both).

      So watch the news cycle carefully for the next 30 days. Friendly "journalists" will be getting special access and you can expect a lot of stories based on that access that will paint things in a positive light. You will see a lot of selling and spinning in the affected countries. By time the full text comes out and the analysis comes out it will be fighting an uphill battle to re-ignite outrage that has already been tamped down.

    3. Re:And we STILL can't read it by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At least Nixon knew when the jig was up and still had enough sense of shame to step down when he was busted. When modern presidents wantonly ignore the law AND get caught they claim is some !$MYPARTY conspiracy to discredit them and carry on.

      We would lucky to have a president with half the integrity or Richard Nixon again.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:And we STILL can't read it by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Doubtlessly to be released to public 24 hours before the Congressional vote...

      With apologies to the late Douglas Adams:

      Congressman: "But the treaty was on display to the public!"
      Disgruntled Voter: “On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find it.”

      Congressman: “That’s the display department.”
      Disgruntled Voter: “With a flashlight.”

      Congressman: “Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”
      Disgruntled Voter: “So had the stairs.”

      Congressman: “But look, you found the treaty, didn’t you?”
      Disgruntled Voter: “Yes, yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

  6. Canada by Kinthelt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's an election going on here. Whether or not Canada signs is depends greatly upon which party wins. Right now, it's pretty much a (nationwide) three-way tie. But that doesn't mean an even sharing of the seats in parliament, as the NDP are expected to "waste" a lot of votes in Quebec, so it's actually a much closer race between the Liberals and incumbent Conservatives.

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    1. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to Wikileaks, the State Owned Enterprises section of this agreement was to basically green light the selling of the CBC and Canada Post and allow for suits against crown corporations for interfering in the market. Do we have the final text of this section?

  7. ITT by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    any one for reclaiming their government from the corporations and plutocrats that have corrupted it to their purposes?

    or are we all just going to sit around whining about government, full stop, no further thought on the topic

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ITT by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How would you suggest going about doing that?

      It sounds nice, but it isn't as simple as you make it sound.

    2. Re:ITT by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there is a mistaken notion that you have to devise a perfect solution to the problem before improving the problem

      for example: we have laws against rape and murder. that doesn't stop all rape and murder, but no one is arguing that, just because we can't stop all rape and murder, we shouldn't have any laws against them. but we do have morons arguing that because we can't magically stop all corruption, we shouldn't try to minimize it

      the point is to simply minimize the problem. the simple fact is that many nations do better than the usa in regards to controlling corruption and plutocrat interest. with very simple changes (simple in construct, i didn't say simple to achieve). for example: we pass laws that cut down on the election cycle funding by corporations and plutocrats. i'd argue the most destructive event against the usa, in it's entire history, worse than 9/11, worse than pearl harbor, even worse than the civil war, is the 2010 citizens' united decision. let's start by reversing that

      a lot of whining at this point about how that's hard. because the right thing is hard to do is an argument against doing it? anything worth doing in this world is hard by definition. if it were easy, it would already be done. this is just lazy whiners

      elect people that would promise to reverse citizen's united. i'm not saying it's going to happen in 2016. but every day people grow angrier and more aware of the problem. look at the interest in trump and sanders. these "protest votes" would usually fade by now in previous cycles. but people are really getting mad. at some point, a tipping point will be reached. this problem isn't going away, and is getting worse. not enough people are paying attention right now. but more and more are every day

      really our biggest enemy is acceptance and cynicism. there's always people with bad intent in this world. they always need to be defeated. but instead of rolling up our sleeves and doing that, the perplexing and maddening thing is people who roll over and accept being robbed, and then rationalize their victimhood with cynicism. this is our real enemy: willing slaves

      you will see this mentality in many comments in this thread and other threads on the topic of corruption and government. those people are the real reason we have our problems

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  8. vote trump he will kill this by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    vote trump he will kill this

    1. Re:vote trump he will kill this by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 4, Informative

      You meant this as a joke but there are only three candidates who have strongly come out against this: Trump, Sanders, and Paul. Of those only Sanders and Trump are polling strongly. For the economic interests of myself and especially my children I would gladly vote for either Trump or Sanders. Or Paul if by some miracle he gets pass the primaries. Want more "free trade" - vote Clinton II or Bush III

  9. Fast Track by sycodon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course those morons passed fast track for this TREATY, which it is.

    So no matter what nasty surprises are found in it, if anyone actually gets to see it, changing them will next to impossible.

    Someone should sue and charge that this is, in fact, a Treaty and subject to the provisions of the Constitution regarding treaties.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  10. Answer? by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Proponents will also have to answer

    You can give China MFN status one day in the name of "human rights" theater and then lecture Americans about the importance of environmental protection the next, and no one anywhere blinks an eye. Exactly when are proponents going to have to answer to anyone, about anything? Elites have been trading US prosperity for various and sundry bad overseas agendas since forever and none of them have ever paid the least price.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  11. Re:Tech circles vs slashdot by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, I don't oppose TTP because of Obama. I oppose it because it is a secret deal, pre approved by the powers that be, and enough (D) and (R) supported it to make it bi-partisan. If you support it, not knowing anything other than it was "Obama says it will be good" then you are the real fool. I bet you'd oppose it if GWB supported it (all other things considered).

    The fact is, the whole (D) good (R) bad (Or visa versa) is really getting old. And do not pretend the (D) don't do the very same thing. Blindly following your party is for Sheeple.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-...

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  12. I'm curious by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone here ever met anyone who is in favor of the Trans Pacific Partnership?

    I mean, I've met people who don't know what it is, but I have yet to meet someone who's all, "Yes! We need this Trans Pacific Partnership to make my life better."

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. Supersedes NAFTA by rockabilly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Canada, USA and Mexico are all involved in this deal, this will replace NAFTA. To get a better idea of how this will affect you, just look at what NAFTA did.

  14. Individual tax payers get the shaft again by nickmalthus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until 1913, customs duties (tariffs) and excise taxes were the primary sources of federal revenue. This was by design of the Constitutional framers. In 1913 the income tax was introduced and coincidentally or not the federal reserve corporation was also established. Provided that globalists corporations shift their tax liability to the most corrupt or more politely business friendly tax haven the funding of the US government falls almost exclusively on the shoulders of the middle class who can afford to pay taxes.

    Do not like any provision in this agreement? Tough luck, your elective representatives have no power to enact any change.

    This agreement is yet another boon for multinational corporations who own politicians and another step towards global totalitarian government.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
  15. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by Art+Challenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and the first clue should have been "negotiated in secret". This is almost all the bad IP parts of the bills the Congress has been trying to pass but couldn't because of the public scrutiny (see SOPA, CISPA, etc.). Now they just get to vote "yes" on a "jobs" bill. The only remaining question is can they do it without drooling at the prospect of the campaign finance monies they'll get for doing the bidding of their handlers.

  16. NAFTA is a disaster by Piata · · Score: 5, Informative

    Canada has been completely screwed over by NAFTA. If we try to enact any kind of environmental protection, a US company sues Canada for millions. It creates a situation where if Canada wants to reduce the amount of water, lumber or other natural resources exported, or more tightly control the extraction of those resources, US companies can succesfully sue Canada for increased costs or lost profit.

    NAFTA's Chapter 11 Makes Canada Most-Sued Country Under Free Trade Tribunals

    It's great that poor countries can see increased growth from this, but the reality is large trade agreements often make a few people companies/people richer while reducing a country's sovreignty and the quality of life of the average joe.