Slashdot Mirror


China Arrests Hackers At Behest of US Government (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader writes: For the first time, the Chinese government has arrested a group of hackers at the request of the United States. The hackers are suspected of having "stolen commercial secrets" from companies in the U.S., which were then passed on to Chinese competitors. "The arrests come amid signs of a potential change in the power balance between the U.S. and Chinese governments on commercial cyberespionage, one of the most fraught issues between the two countries. For years, U.S. firms and officials have said Beijing hasn't done enough to crack down on digital larceny." It's a big first step in establishing a functional cybersecurity relationship between the two nations. Now, everyone will be watching to see if China follows up the arrests with prosecution. "A public trial is important not only because that would be consistent with established principles of criminal justice, but because it could discourage other would-be hackers and show that the arrests were not an empty gesture."

74 comments

  1. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who ends up with their kidneys?

    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Korean restaurants, of course.

    2. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they are too valuable for that on the transplant market.

    3. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they are too valuable for that on the transplant market.

      You obviously have no idea how much affluent Koreans will pay for Chinese kidney.

  2. 9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was "American'.

    1. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 0

      I think all the natives that already lived here beg to differ.

    2. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by execthis · · Score: 3

      What *is* native? The human species has been migrating extensively between continents since its beginnings. A few thousand years or even tens of thousands of years one way or another is still a drop in the bucket in terms of the ancient age of the species and its predecessors.

      To claim that some group or other is "native" - and thus somehow privileged or entitled - because it migrated slightly earlier, or didn't use ships or something silly like that is totally bunk.

      Every human being on Earth is a native and deserves full right to where they are. All this crap about celebrating "natives" is a just a form of bigotry and racism, and of one group trying to claim entitlement which they don't deserve.

    3. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Alright, I'm going to move into your house and claim part of it for myself.

    4. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you'll be moving out of your mom's basement?

    5. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      Technically we are all African.

    6. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I sure hope execthis' house has a basement too!

    7. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Technically we're all star dust.

    8. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      "Do you own this land?"

      "No. How can you own land?"

      I have no idea if the other guy is a racist asshole or not, but I know you're ignorant of history.

      In my own State, only a small percent of the land was claimed by locals inhabitants. For the most part, settlers settled anywhere that didn't already somebody living there, and the people living next door usually agreed they had every right to settle on unused land.

      This obviously doesn't apply everywhere, but in the majority of cases it does. And there were brand new cultures that were recently founded after the Spanish brought a bunch horses over. Those are the groups that actually had the most military conflict with Americans.

      I'm part Cherokee and we lost our lands, but that isn't what happened in most places. In most places they were simply outnumbered by the newcomers, and so lost administrative power over areas. And then were given "reservations" in order to have an area of administrative control. In many cases, control that they didn't have over their neighbors culturally prior to the creation of the reservations!

    9. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Technically we're all star dust.

      I'm part hydrogen you insensitive clod!

    10. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      No, you are wholly processed hydrogen.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    11. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Technically we are all insensitive clods.

    12. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We declare ownership of your mom's basement in the name of Slashdot!

      Now, where did I put that damned flag?

    13. Re: 9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9 out of 10 Americans think you should stop breathing so that others may survive.

    14. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he would never be able to become a president of the US, problems with birth certificates and such.

    15. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I think all the natives that already lived here beg to differ.

      Once they've been ethnically cleansed, they don't get a vote.

    16. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Technically we are all insensitive clods.

      In the kingdom of the insensitive clods, the partially-sensate clod is king!

    17. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Check the printer. You know you don't buy physical things that aren't electronic or that you can't eat.

    18. Re: 9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially if you ask communist inflamed women who want their genes go ectinct.

    19. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      66 Technically we're all star dust. 99

      You have constructively asserted your identity as a godless intellectual Therefore, you are guilty of the deaths of tens of millions of human beings.

    20. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sorry kiddo, thanks for playing! But no, your pedanticism falls on its face. The differentiation you're saying "no" to is that everything that isn't hydrogen is star dust. Pointing out that that means that star dust is processed hydrogen is a "yes," not a "no." That was actually the point. It is that act of "processing" that creates "star dust." *whoosh*

      What he said was we're "all" star dust. I was pointing out that the portions of me that are still hydrogen are not star dust. It was a play on the word "all," primarily. Attempting to label the star dust as still being hydrogen, which seems to actually dispute that the periodic elements are different substances, combined with the word "no" attempts to offer a correction, but is actually not even hitting the point. Even if it were so, it would in no way change the prior exchange. The helium is no longer hydrogen, but the H2O still has some. Even though the helium was made "from" hydrogen.

    21. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What *is* native? The human species has been migrating extensively between continents since its beginnings. A few thousand years or even tens of thousands of years one way or another is still a drop in the bucket in terms of the ancient age of the species and its predecessors.

      First I say over 40,000 years earlier is more than a drop in the bucket. Still even if it was 10 years we were here first and had claim to the land.

      Second actually I prefer the original American Indian or in my case Cherokee.

      The big point you don't make is how you acquired the land your house is on. Killing raping and trying to destroy a whole people and their way of life. Sorry you missed on I'm still here.

      is a just a form of bigotry and racism, and of one group trying to claim entitlement which they don't deserve.

      So what you are saying here is that it is ok for me to come in your house kill you and your family and move right in. That was your "right of entitlement" so that makes it alright to return the favor doesn't it?

      Really with all the shit that came down on my people you want to spout this shit. May I just say FUCK YOU

  3. If they start cracking down. by Redbehrend · · Score: 1

    If they start cracking down they'll just move... we need more innovation and coop when it comes security. We should hold the companies liable for their poor firmware and software that way they actually care about it.

  4. ...arrests people without sufficient connections by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only people that were arrested were individuals that no longer had enough favor to block the arrest.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  5. Next arrest made in the USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on behalf of China! Isn't that great folks, China can arrest you Americans too!

  6. Re:...arrests people without sufficient connection by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

    Regardless, lacking evidence to the contrary I'd expect this to be mostly for show. So these hackers may get their trial. And be punished. But not before they've handed over their spoils so that Chinese government and/or manufacturers can put "stolen commercial secrets" to productive use.

    Brought to you by the copy-first-ask-questions-later dept.

  7. Principles of criminal justice by easyTree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "A public trial is important not only because that would be consistent with established principles of criminal justice,...

    Someone should pass this on to the US.

    *cough* Guantanamo .

    1. Re:Principles of criminal justice by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "*cough* Guantanamo"

      To name just one.

      The number of well documented criminal actions committed by the US government or its representatives, including major war crimes and terrorism, currently and in the last 65 years, is quite surprising for the average American.

    2. Re:Principles of criminal justice by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The "war crimes" laws are too vague. But the USA has indeed done lots of highly foolish things regardless of the legal category of the boneheaded actions.

    3. Re: Principles of criminal justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its not a surprise to Americans moron
        For once use your melon and get off the "Let's hate America" bus. Unless your country sucks so bad that you have no choice but to hate on the USA to make yourself feel better. And if you are an American then go buy yourself a one way ticket to a much better country like North Korea or China. Heck I hear the EU is amazing with Greece as a great example. Seriously if the USA is so bad then stop complaining and move. We are tired of your hating, crying, and complaining, let some other country deal with it.

    4. Re:Principles of criminal justice by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Principles of criminal justice

      "A public trial is important not only because that would be consistent with established principles of criminal justice,...

      Someone should pass this on to the US.

      *cough* Guantanamo .

      I can help you with that "cough" by passing this on to you: Guantanamo Bay is a prisoner of war camp, not part of the civilian criminal justice system. You can hold prisoners of war without trial. That's the way it works. The US is in an armed conflict against Al Qaeda and its associates as authorized by the US Congress in its Authorization for Use of Military Force following 9/11/2001.

      That has been covered countless times here and in the media. Is there some special reason why you've got this wrong after about 13 years?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Principles of criminal justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can help you with that "cough" by passing this on to you: Guantanamo Bay is a prisoner of war camp, not part of the civilian criminal justice system. You can hold prisoners of war without trial. That's the way it works.

      And that is where the problem lies.

      The US is in an armed conflict against Al Qaeda and its associates as authorized by the US Congress in its Authorization for Use of Military Force following 9/11/2001.

      That has been covered countless times here and in the media. Is there some special reason why you've got this wrong after about 13 years?

      And with the US in an armed conflict there is no need to have a trial to determine if the person that claims to be a Chinese hacker is what he claims to be, for all we know he can be an Al Qaeda fighter and now a prisoner of war.

      As long as the US is at war the justice system is put in a place where the government freely can pick and choose who it applies to.

    6. Re:Principles of criminal justice by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      "*cough* Guantanamo"

      To name just one.

      That's not even one. Guantanamo Bay holds prisoners of war, not common criminals from the civilian criminal justice system. It is entirely legitimate to hold them without trial, that's the way it works.

      The number of well documented criminal actions committed by the US government or its representatives, including major war crimes and terrorism, currently and in the last 65 years, is quite surprising for the average American.

      It is quite surprising and infuriating to the average anti-American how many of those claims evaporate like a puff of smoke in the wind or are demonstrated to be molehills decried as mountains when subjected to serious scrutiny in which the standard is the actual law or treaty, or simply the facts, not the specious claims of advocates from the remote fringes of the political spectrum. Communists and the far Left have frequently practiced that sort of game. Case in point: the Soviet Union propaganda campaign falsely claiming that the US government created AIDs.

      AIDS: A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT : Soviets Suggest Experiment Leaks in U.S. Created the AIDS Epidemic

       

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Principles of criminal justice by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you are talking about. The rules of the armed conflict apply to Al Qaeda, not Chinese Hackers (unless they are part of Al Qaeda). How did you ever come to hold that nonsense?

      No, the government cannot "freely" "pick and choose who it applies to." If you want to try to make that silly claim then how do you explain that Guantanamo Bay has never held as many as 800 people in nearly 15 years. How could that be if what you suggest is true?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re: Principles of criminal justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fuck you, I'M AMERICAN!"

      That's why we love you so much

    9. Re:Principles of criminal justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the US is at war the justice system is put in a place where the government freely can pick and choose who it applies to.

      And.. .surprise surprise, the US has been at war since the year of its inception (excepting thirteen years spread around throughout that period.)

    10. Re: Principles of criminal justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fabricated a quote. That's why we love you so much.

    11. Re: Principles of criminal justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you mention Greece as a great example of the EU, how many of the states are bankrupt?
      There is always Michigan.... right in your own backyard.

      It is interesting to see people like yourself with such a hate on for China, yet you continue to borrow money from them?
      Please tell me you are not one of those people who thinks the other nations all owe the US.

    12. Re:Principles of criminal justice by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Not sure I follow you, but isn't the US not at war in Iraq and Afghanistan for a long time now.

  8. about fucking time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... now if only they would go after those chinese assholes who keep trying to hack my ssh server.

  9. Why does the government even get involved? by guruevi · · Score: 0

    Being hacked is a sign that your security is inadequate and most likely your department is being ran by idiots. The only reason the government gets involved is because these same idiots that got hacked want to shift the blame.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Why does the government even get involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, right. Because humans aren't prone to error or simple mistakes.

      Or maybe the hackers in question just happened to find a flaw and capitalized on it in a way no one expected. You know, having original thought.

      Let's see you do better, eh?

    2. Re:Why does the government even get involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, if the hacking side is government sponsored (or at least assisted), then they may have a level of commitment and knowledge that is outside of the hacked side's control.

      After all, if they're aware of zero day attacks in software below your own stack, then it's pretty unfair to blame the victim. If they're not patching their software and leaving their passwords in plaintext, then, sure, you can blame the victim.

    3. Re:Why does the government even get involved? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Or blocked by budget or "we don't support that, don't touch it" policies from upgrading or maintaining old systems.

    4. Re:Why does the government even get involved? by DarkTempes · · Score: 2

      The OP doesn't believe in human error. He certainly never typed "your department is being ran by idiots."

      Past participle, your time is now.

  10. Change in dynamics by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    This is a change in dynamics. Two big things are going on: (1) Americans are probably being more successful at hacking, and (2) China is developing more IP. Historically, rising nations steal IP rampantly until they are mature and developing their own IP in a serious way, then they begin cracking down. The United States did it with textile technology back in the 1800s.

    1. Re:Change in dynamics by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      Add a (3) China's economy is imploding, and they'll grudgingly accept any American demand except one that puts their one true Party system in jeopardy. Once again, capitalism trumps democracy.

    2. Re:Change in dynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more a message to Snowden that China is not a place that he can go to after Russia.

    3. Re:Change in dynamics by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod parent up. China is having major issues, from cities nobody wants to move to, to mass corruption that is becoming more and more evident, to companies than only survive because the government props them up, to huge environmental issues. Lets not forget that traffic jam that hit the intertubes yesterday, 50 lanes being throttled to 20. 50 lanes in 1 direction! Jeebus, I suspect China is going to run face first into reality Real Soon Now (tm), and it's going to give the global markets a huge headache.

    4. Re:Change in dynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You realize that was 20 lanes spreading out to 50 toll booths and then converging back to 20 lanes right....
      Oh you didn't, well think for more than 2 seconds in future.

    5. Re:Change in dynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets not forget that traffic jam that hit the intertubes yesterday, 50 lanes being throttled to 20. 50 lanes in 1 direction!

      Wait, what?

      Did you just bring up a traffic jam as an example of why a superpowers economy will deteriorate in the near future?
      Seems to me like you forgot to type down your train of thought there because those two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

  11. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communism looks like it is working better than what ever America is.

    1. Re:China by DECula · · Score: 1

      Yup, get accused of state sponsored hacking, pick out a few undesirables that have protested, arrest them as hackers. Even if they never saw a keyboard. win-win!

      --
      dreaded scurrilous bit-twiddler from Oklahoma
  12. no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This news makes zero sense to me, which really just goes to show how totally ignorant I am about it. (nudge nudge)

  13. Re:...arrests people without sufficient connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only people that were arrested were individuals that no longer had enough favor to block the arrest.

    Of course. That's the same reason why the US never arrest those corrupt officials who have fled to the US from China, they got enough money to pay their protection money in US.

  14. Which secrets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I didn't RTFA. But it seems summary worthy to give any available highlights. There are some secrets I'd probably be uncomfortable with some chinese citizens stealing from the U.S. But there are probably plenty that would seem ethically justifiable to me in light of human rights violations by the Chinese government. If they were stealing secrets to help seed a democratic revolution, then I say fuck yeah go for it. But if they just want to make a few dollars that U.S. companies that don't deserve to be in jail would have made, then I guess maybe it's a lesser of evils situation.

    1. Re: Which secrets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh boy, you really should get some perspective.

      who fucked iraq into war, chaos and widespread mutilation ?

      who brought isis into existence ?

      who has the biggest prisoner population ?

      who supports the wicked evil of wahabism ?

      eyes, spinlters, beams etc.

  15. Geneva Convention by Samare · · Score: 1

    "*cough* Guantanamo"

    To name just one.

    That's not even one. Guantanamo Bay holds prisoners of war, not common criminals from the civilian criminal justice system. It is entirely legitimate to hold them without trial, that's the way it works.

    Ever heard about the Geneva Convention?
    Here's an excerpt:

    Art 103. Judicial investigations relating to a prisoner of war shall be conducted as rapidly as circumstances permit and so that his trial shall take place as soon as possible. A prisoner of war shall not be confined while awaiting trial unless a member of the armed forces of the Detaining Power would be so confined if he were accused of a similar offence, or if it is essential to do so in the interests of national security. In no circumstances shall this confinement exceed three months.

    1. Re:Geneva Convention by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Ever heard about the Geneva Convention?
      Here's an excerpt:.....

      I have both heard of it, and have a reasonably good understanding of it. I doubt you would quote that section if you shared that understanding.

      That section you quote addresses the issue of prisoners of war who may be charged with offenses while being detained. If a PoW being detained as a participant in a conflict faced a trial over a war crime and was found not guilty that prisoner would continue to be held as a PoW, they wouldn't be released due to being found not guilty of a war crime. Their status as a member of the enemy forces alone is sufficient to continue detaining them.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Geneva Convention by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      My original point was that the US government has, and still does, carry out very unethical and violent 'military' operations world wide.

      Moreover, the majority of US citizens are not fully aware of this fact because of reporting biases.

  16. So when are the US going to arrest their hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For stealing Airbus bids for a fleet of planes and selling that to Boeing so they can win the contract?

    How about the hackers who fucked over the Russian pipelines?

  17. Re: So when are the US going to arrest their hacke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i see you never read anything about rome, sodom and gomorrea.

    otherwise you would not be so germanically naive.

  18. Does not make sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The creditor state gets to run the internal affairs of the debtor states. That ought to mean that US personnel (debtors) act at the behest of CCP/PLA personnel (creditors).

    Since when does the piper pay a tune other that what the one who pays him call?

  19. Combat College Poisoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use of Alinskyite labels including but not limited to "racist", "sexist", "bigot", homophobe", "xenophobe" and "nativist" constitute "fighting words" under Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.

  20. First question upon arrest: by sabbede · · Score: 1

    "Does this mean we're fired?"