Slashdot Mirror


China Arrests Hackers At Behest of US Government (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader writes: For the first time, the Chinese government has arrested a group of hackers at the request of the United States. The hackers are suspected of having "stolen commercial secrets" from companies in the U.S., which were then passed on to Chinese competitors. "The arrests come amid signs of a potential change in the power balance between the U.S. and Chinese governments on commercial cyberespionage, one of the most fraught issues between the two countries. For years, U.S. firms and officials have said Beijing hasn't done enough to crack down on digital larceny." It's a big first step in establishing a functional cybersecurity relationship between the two nations. Now, everyone will be watching to see if China follows up the arrests with prosecution. "A public trial is important not only because that would be consistent with established principles of criminal justice, but because it could discourage other would-be hackers and show that the arrests were not an empty gesture."

8 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. ...arrests people without sufficient connections by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only people that were arrested were individuals that no longer had enough favor to block the arrest.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  2. Principles of criminal justice by easyTree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "A public trial is important not only because that would be consistent with established principles of criminal justice,...

    Someone should pass this on to the US.

    *cough* Guantanamo .

  3. Change in dynamics by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    This is a change in dynamics. Two big things are going on: (1) Americans are probably being more successful at hacking, and (2) China is developing more IP. Historically, rising nations steal IP rampantly until they are mature and developing their own IP in a serious way, then they begin cracking down. The United States did it with textile technology back in the 1800s.

  4. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by execthis · · Score: 3

    What *is* native? The human species has been migrating extensively between continents since its beginnings. A few thousand years or even tens of thousands of years one way or another is still a drop in the bucket in terms of the ancient age of the species and its predecessors.

    To claim that some group or other is "native" - and thus somehow privileged or entitled - because it migrated slightly earlier, or didn't use ships or something silly like that is totally bunk.

    Every human being on Earth is a native and deserves full right to where they are. All this crap about celebrating "natives" is a just a form of bigotry and racism, and of one group trying to claim entitlement which they don't deserve.

  5. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

    Alright, I'm going to move into your house and claim part of it for myself.

  6. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

    Technically we are all African.

  7. Re:9 out of 10 "Americans" think Columbus by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    "Do you own this land?"

    "No. How can you own land?"

    I have no idea if the other guy is a racist asshole or not, but I know you're ignorant of history.

    In my own State, only a small percent of the land was claimed by locals inhabitants. For the most part, settlers settled anywhere that didn't already somebody living there, and the people living next door usually agreed they had every right to settle on unused land.

    This obviously doesn't apply everywhere, but in the majority of cases it does. And there were brand new cultures that were recently founded after the Spanish brought a bunch horses over. Those are the groups that actually had the most military conflict with Americans.

    I'm part Cherokee and we lost our lands, but that isn't what happened in most places. In most places they were simply outnumbered by the newcomers, and so lost administrative power over areas. And then were given "reservations" in order to have an area of administrative control. In many cases, control that they didn't have over their neighbors culturally prior to the creation of the reservations!

  8. Re:Why does the government even get involved? by DarkTempes · · Score: 2

    The OP doesn't believe in human error. He certainly never typed "your department is being ran by idiots."

    Past participle, your time is now.