Slashdot Mirror


How Amazon's Monster Erotica Book Ban Shaped CloudFlare's Censorship Stance (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes with news that CloudFlare chief executive Matthew Prince recently spoke about how Amazon's ban on "monster erotica" helped shape his position on censorship. ZDNet reports: "I worry about Jeff Bezos' bizarre obsession with dinosaur sex," said Prince, towards the end of a long conversation in our New York newsroom. "I don't think I've ever heard a chief executive -- hell, I don't think I've ever heard anyone say anything like that before," I said. Prince was referring to how the bookseller and online retail giant banned so-called "monster erotica," a genre of fan-fiction revolving around fantasy-based fictional encounters with mythical or extinct creatures (including dinosaurs), which was for a time sold on its online bookstore. Amazon, according to reports, pulled hundreds of the self-published books it sold -- as well as some content that fetishized incest and rape -- despite "vague" guidelines by the retailer. "You can make a rational argument that if you're writing books fantasizing about having sex with animals or children, maybe that promotes a certain kind of behavior. But there's no risk of someone abusing a dinosaur," he said.

125 comments

  1. He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is indecent towards dinosaurs and hurts their feelings.

    1. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your confusing specist and racist is problematic, you conservative fuck.

    2. Re:He's right by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      besides my cock is much bigger than that pathetic little vienna sausage you call a penis

      Oh yeah? (SFW)

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the thing ... I am what people call an atheist. Dont give a crap about stupid fictional characters created to control and brainwash the uneducated and ignorant.

      But while I believe people have the right to express themselves, I also believe that companies have the right to reject those expressions when they are inside a gray or red area. And this particular book, is in a very gray area .... because it is almost (as in indirectly) targeting children.

      The author is questioning why somebody who doesn't like images of dinosaur sex .... but I question the mentality of the one who created the images more than the one who objects to it.

    4. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that is what your mom tells you every time she wipes your butt, but in the end it is just a motherly white lie to spare your feelings. Ever notice how hard she laughs every time she walks away??

    5. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this is what happens when libtards are allowed to run things. i'm waiting for them to say it's RACIST against dinosaurs, pretending like dinosaur is a race

      ..and this is what happens when bored, precocious children of overly-permissive parents are allowed unmonitored access to the Internet: They become annoying little trolls, lowering the S/N ratio all the way down to the noise floor in any discussion they litter with their verbal diarrhea.
      ************
      Meanwhile, back in actual discussion:
      This has nothing to do with what's 'appropriate', it has everything to do with the 'moral pendulum' swinging back towards prudish, ultra-conservatist ways, in a knee-jerk of an over-correction. It in no way represents the opinions of the majority, it only represents the over-amplified voice of a small minority, who ironically enough are extremists in their own way. Give it 20 or 30 years, and things will swing back the other way again. And so on. Look at history: It never stops.

    6. Re:He's right by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      This has nothing to do with what's 'appropriate', it has everything to do with the 'moral pendulum' swinging back towards prudish, ultra-conservatist ways,

      It's the left--particularly SJWs--leading the push against pr0n, because it promotes rape culture and is demeaning to dinosaurs.

    7. Re:He's right by Hartree · · Score: 1

      "Dont give a crap about stupid fictional characters created to control and brainwash the uneducated and ignorant."

      Hey! Stop dissing Sexual Harassment Panda!

    8. Re:He's right by bankman · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's the left--particularly SJWs--leading the push against pr0n, because it promotes rape culture and is demeaning to dinosaurs.

      Damn, I hate those social jurassic warriors.

      --
      I feel so sig.
    9. Re:He's right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      It's the left--particularly SJWs--leading the push against pr0n, because it promotes rape culture and is demeaning to dinosaurs.

      Do we? I mean I've been "accused" of being an SJW numerous times, and I've never pushed against porn. And the left? It's the right wing government over here in the UK which wants to censor porn.

      I think perhaps they should cover up all the naughty bits with a picture of David Cameron's face rather than a fig leaf.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to start reading the paper of the regressives, The Guardian.

      They have not only been pushing against porn for years, they've even spent a decade trying to get Page 3 banned as its "violence + pornography and rape culture"

    11. Re:He's right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's the left--particularly SJWs--leading the push against pr0n

      Do we? I mean I've been "accused" of being an SJW numerous times, and I've never pushed against porn.

      Most of the people who use the term "SJW" are shitheels. You can't expect them to apply it evenly or judiciously. Yes, we've all seen the PC police go too far, but the anti-SJW crowd is targeted by those people for a fucking reason, and it's not just bleeding hearts dripping in one direction. They truly do harbor countless hypocritical fuckhead assholes amongst their ranks.

      SJW is only meant to be applied to the professionally offended. Instead, tinyweener'd trolls taunt with't.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:He's right by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      To me an SJW is somebody who, for example, tells a woman that she can't be in favor of gamergate because she's a woman. Or at least, that's what a few SJWs have said to a few prominent feminists that are in favor of gamergate.

    13. Re:He's right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      To me an SJW is somebody who, for example, tells a woman that she can't be in favor of gamergate because she's a woman. Or at least, that's what a few SJWs have said to a few prominent feminists that are in favor of gamergate.

      Well, at least that's specific and demonstrable. Thankfully such people are blessedly rare. There are of course an awful lot of people on the internet so no matter how silly an opinion, you'll find some people with it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He vould have an enormous schwanzstucker. (Inga)

    15. Re:He's right by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      "I think perhaps they should cover up all the naughty bits with a picture of David Cameron's face rather than a fig leaf."

      Now that truly is disgusting.. Unless he was being eaten by a dinosaur, now that I could come to. [snigger] :D

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    16. Re:He's right by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Unless he was being eaten by a dinosaur, now that I could come to. [snigger] :D

      or a pig

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    17. Re:He's right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Now that truly is disgusting.

      Why thankyou :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. Sex is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Weird people shouldn't have sexual fantasies. It scares boring normal people.

    1. Re:Sex is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Websites should be forced to host all content.

  3. There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Birds are dinosaurs! Won't someone think of the birds?!

    1. Re:There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    2. Re:There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of the poor pigeons and their cloacae at the town squares everywhere! Human-dinosaur sex is technically a form of anal rape, if we stick to the agreed definitions of behavior of the current society. Sex with fantasy creatures, on the other hand, is not for who knows what kids of genitalia, level of consciousness and relentless desire for cross-species intercourse those fantasy creatures have.

    3. Re:There is a risk! by PPH · · Score: 1

      Quick! Someone get over to Wikipedia and add a paragraph on this subject to the 'chicken' entry.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:There is a risk! by Sara+Chan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Human-dinosaur sex is technically a form of anal rape

      You are obviously male and confused. Essentially all the human-dinosaur sex fantasies are of male dinosaurs having regular (especially vaginal) sex with female people. The novels of those fantasies are hardly ever bought by men.

    5. Re: There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=field-keywords=Gay+dino+erotica

    6. Re: There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=field-keywords=Gay+dino+erotica

      There's a few with male-male Dino-human sex

    7. Re:There is a risk! by willworkforbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quick! Someone get over to Wikipedia and add a paragraph on this subject to the 'chicken' entry.

      I think things like 'chicken entry' is exactly what's being banned at Amazon.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    8. Re:There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Surely dinosaurs had cloacas as well? (soft tissue issues are hard, granted ;)) If the target audience is females preferring intercourse, then the creatures surely belong to the category of fantasy creatures, and everything goes as stated.

    9. Re: There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >cloacae

      Huh. I've always called it the "vaganus" .

    10. Re:There is a risk! by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      Human-dinosaur sex is technically a form of anal rape

      You are obviously male and confused. Essentially all the human-dinosaur sex fantasies are of male dinosaurs having regular (especially vaginal) sex with female people. The novels of those fantasies are hardly ever bought by men.

      Since the fantasy is aimed at female readers, does that mean the dinosaurs have to take the women in the stories out to dinner and on long walks together before doing the deed?

    11. Re:There is a risk! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      see, there you go. That's exactly what we're talking about, people like you fantasizing about dinosaur's sex organs. Well, that filth might pass here on slashdot but at least amazon is walking the path of censored righteousness.

    12. Re:There is a risk! by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      How exactly would that work, given that dinosaurs probably didn't have penises?

    13. Re:There is a risk! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Since the fantasy is aimed at female readers, does that mean the dinosaurs have to take the women in the stories out to dinner and on long walks together before doing the deed?

      Women want to have sex without preamble too, but a lot of them have been convinced otherwise so apparently they have to fantasize about fucking lizards in order to just get down to it.

      I've known some glorious counterexamples, this isn't about sexism, this is about society.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:There is a risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much of a pervert are you? When you are out shopping do you buy:
      a) A pound of ground beef.
      b) Two large grapefruit and an enormous pork salami
      c) A stick of butter and a small plucked chicken.

    15. Re:There is a risk! by bob_super · · Score: 1

      It means that T-Rex get shafted because their tiny hands can't provide the required back rub.

    16. Re:There is a risk! by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Only in the human male on female t-rex fantasy novels.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  4. Is a money thing by caffiend666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is a money thing. Other sites like Smashwords spells it out more thoroughly. The claim is that they are unable to keep up with the requests for refunds due to bad porn and people who claim they didn't really buy it and risk having their merchant licenses pulled.

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
    1. Re:Is a money thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a money thing. Other sites like Smashwords spells it out more thoroughly. The claim is that they are unable to keep up with the requests for refunds due to bad porn and people who claim they didn't really buy it and risk having their merchant licenses pulled.

      I can't tell if it's stupidity or ignorance when reading that refunds were due to "bad porn", as if consumers of this actually know what good porn is...

  5. Prevent microagressions against species! by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Short-armed Tyrannosaurs are poorly served by erotic literature.

    1. Re:Prevent microagressions against species! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet the trees sure took a beating...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. Just doesn't get it by MikeRT · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But there's no risk of someone abusing a dinosaur

    A dinosaur is an animal. Therefore someone fantasizes about screwing a dinosaur is going to be more open-minded toward animals that actually live today.

    Funny thing about all of this chick erotica about vampires and werewolves is that it's obviously socially-approved necrophilia and beastiality. A vampire is an undead creature; basically a sexy zombie with full mental faculties. A werewolf? Changes into a wolf or a wolf-man beast. It doesn't need to get too much more analytic to realize that this is just a way to flirt with a taboo without going too far down the rabbit hole.

    1. Re:Just doesn't get it by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      going too far down the rabbit hole.

      Watch it there, buddy!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dinosaur is an animal. Therefore someone fantasizes about screwing a dinosaur is going to be more open-minded toward animals that actually live today.

      You actually believe that, don't you? You actually believe that some goofball who likes dino porn is actually going to end up fucking a real animal?

      That's not really the way it works, you know.

    3. Re:Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so sick of people referring to using their brain as "going down the rabbit hole", but it generally comes from people who obviously don't know how to use theirs so I guess it shouldn't really seem so annoying. IDK, it still is.

      I'm also sick of people equating "open minded" with "sick, perverse, and dangerous", but that's always how it is.

      Get over yourself.

      I am sick that I even commented on this story, however, but it needs to be said to people like you.

    4. Re:Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barney is a dinosaur. Jeff Bezos doesn't want amazon.com to offer Barney-themed erotica. I'd bet it's more a trademark issue; vampire and werewolves should be old enough to be past protection?

    5. Re:Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone who owns a gun is going to be more likely to murder other people. Ban guns.

    6. Re: Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A vampire is an undead creature; basically a sexy zombie with full mental faculties

      Isn't that a pretty important difference? If you're not getting your sex morality prescribed by a religious text/figure, it pretty much comes down to mental ability to consent. Human adults are pretty much just humans with full mental faculties, so does sex with human adults promote underage sex?

      Morality aside, I would expect that can be a rather important part of people's fantasies. You can't just replace adults in my more vanilla fantasies with someone immature and call it similar, especially if I can't stand the behaviour of children. I would expect it would be similar for other people, and changing the mental and physical capabilities of their fantasies amounting to a rather fundamental change making it not similar at all.

    7. Re:Just doesn't get it by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A dinosaur is an animal. Therefore someone fantasizes about screwing a dinosaur is going to be more open-minded toward animals that actually live today.

      A human is an animal. Therefore someone who fantasizes about screwing a human is going to be more open-minded towards animals.

      Ban hetero-normal sex. It's the only way to save the animals.

    8. Re:Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's funny that people get excited about sex with dinos.

      Say, didn't Fred Flintstone's daughter live with a dinosaur? I never even suspected!!

      But as far as I'm concerned, if someone wants to have sex with a tree, or a donut, I couldn't care less. As long as they leave me alone.

    9. Re: Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to shut the fuck up.

    10. Re:Just doesn't get it by Hartree · · Score: 1

      "Say, didn't Fred Flintstone's daughter live with a dinosaur?"

      Sorry to have to break it to you, bub. Yes, there are fan fictions about Pebbles and Dino.

    11. Re:Just doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed to confirm you are a human. Please start from the beginning and try again. If you are a human, we apologize for the inconvenience.

    12. Re:Just doesn't get it by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I must be in the 1% then. I don't give a shit what someone sticks in their body as long as it's consensual on all sides.

  7. no risk of someone abusing a dinosaur by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    No, but somebody please! Think of the whales...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:no risk of someone abusing a dinosaur by will_die · · Score: 2
  8. Nasty words, you have been warned! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Where's the "rancid assholes" guy when you need him? Here's your story chance!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  9. What ban? by Nate+the+greatest · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh, Amazon didn't ban monster erotica - or dino erotica: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb... http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb... The guy clearly doesn't know what he us talking about

    1. Re:What ban? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Uh, Amazon didn't ban monster erotica - or dino erotica

      Up until a few minutes ago, I was blissfully unaware that monster erotica or dinosaur erotica were even things. I mean, I know that man's capacity for deviance is endless, but I had no idea.

      I think it's time for me to start drinking to see if I can erase the images these things bring to mind. I may never be the same again.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:What ban? by WarlockD · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you RTFA you will find a link to a 2013 article about it: linky

      I am sure there might of been a slashdot entry but alot of the eroctica section got nerfed. Then almost as soon as it happened it was back. Like almost no point to the whole thing. More likely not because of the outrage but because of the lawsuits on an undefined policy.

      That's what the cloud fire guy is talking about. Companies arbitrarily deciding whats good or bad on their networks. He makes probery the best quote out of the whole thing:

      "I'm somewhat skeptical of slippery slope arguments. But, if you ban books that depict sex with dinosaurs, it doesn't take much before you ban books." - CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince

    3. Re:What ban? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      "But, if you ban books that depict sex with dinosaurs, it doesn't take much before you ban books." - CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince"

      That's the worst argument ever. Ever.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    4. Re:What ban? by Nate+the+greatest · · Score: 2

      Speaking as a guy who wrote about it at the time, lots of erotica was pulled from the major ebookstores for a time. (I don't think Monster erotica was included, but it could have been.) And to be clear, there was no ban on monster erotica. It was being sold, and is being sold.

    5. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost all non-free erotica is targeted towards and bought by females. Males buy porn not stories.

    6. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's the worst argument ever. Ever."

      No. Your post is the worst argument ever. Ever.

      Sadly it is also the most frequently made argument too.

    7. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your MOM is the most frequently made argument.

      BOOYAH

    8. Re:What ban? by hey! · · Score: 2

      That's what the cloud fire guy is talking about. Companies arbitrarily deciding whats good or bad on their networks.

      Well that actually puts the issue in a different light; or at least it potentially does. There are two reasons a company might decide some content is bad on their network. The first is that it's bad for their customers. That's not only none of the company's affair, it makes no business sense. The second reason would be if it's bad for the company itself.

      How can something that sells be bad for the company? Lots of ways; it could take up a lot of time and not make very much money; it could damage the company's brand; it could alter the user experience the company is trying to provide. Now personally I think the idea that dinosaur erotica poses a problem for Amazon or its users is a bit far-fetched. But if Bezos had some basis to believe that it did pose a problem then banning it would be both reasonable and rational.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure he meant "man" as in "mankind", not necessarily only males.

    10. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot a 3rd reason: Clusterfuck.
      Happens waaaay more often than people expect.

    11. Re:What ban? by Jiro · · Score: 1

      There's a third reason (a fourth if you count the AC's below): Implict threat of government intervention. It's how we got the Comics Code authority and video game ratings. Yes, it was pressure groups, but one of the reasons pressure from pressure groups works is that if the company doesn't obey, they can pressure the government into cracking down on the company "to protect the children" or "to stop violence against women". For that matter, they can just directly sue the company in order to censor them; even if the company wins, they're bankrupt from the lawsuit and from being dropped by everyone else who doesn't want to be the next lawsuit target.

      Even if you only consider government activity to be censorship, laundering the government activity through a private group doesn't make it cease to be that.

    12. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4th reason: No one banned anything, but through incompetence or malice the wrong action is taken on a flawed set of data, and later, the issue is corrected.

    13. Re:What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure he meant "man" as in "mankind", not necessarily only males.

      I'm pretty sure given the statistics we need to correct all statements referring to this to read "womenkind" for accuracy.

      Hey, you ladies want to scream for gender equality? Then learn to take that spotlight whenever you've earned it. We men certainly have.

    14. Re:What ban? by Megol · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he meant "man" as in "mankind", not necessarily only males.

      I'm pretty sure given the statistics we need to correct all statements referring to this to read "womenkind" for accuracy.

      Hey, you ladies want to scream for gender equality? Then learn to take that spotlight whenever you've earned it. We men certainly have.

      Ignoring the rest of your message: I'm sure _you_ haven't earned anything.

    15. Re:What ban? by Rufty · · Score: 1

      Finally, a reason for tequila!

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    16. Re: What ban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because it doesn't go far enough. If you ban books about anything, even sappy romantic Anne Frank and Adolf Hitler books you are already banning books and no amount of special pleading will change that fact.

  10. No risk to dinosaurs, you say? by splitsevin · · Score: 1

    I've seen the movies. They come back. It gets ugly.

    --
    The enemy of my enemy is quite possibly also my enemy. I've made a lot of enemies.
    1. Re:No risk to dinosaurs, you say? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I've seen the movies. They come back. It gets ugly.

      Jurassic World had it wrong. When we bring dinosaurs back, we should fiddle with the genetics to make them better lovers, not better killers.

      Dozens of Amazon literotica book-sellers can't be wrong! :-9

  11. What about Barney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perverts....

    1. Re:What about Barney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I love you,

      You love me.

      That's called bestiality...

  12. whole thing is stupid anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can make a rational argument that if you're writing books fantasizing about having sex with animals or children, maybe that promotes a certain kind of behavior

    no, you can't. you can only make an irrational argument for that assertion.

    otherwise the videogames, movies, television, toys, the population consume day in and day out would have resulted in "promoting" that behavior. but it doesn't. Instead, society continues to think that murder and etc is a bad thing. because of course it is. as is sex with children. people who engage in that kind of shit (and I mean actually engage in it, not have sex with or photograph some willing teenager or pee on some bush or leave the curtains open and so on) are waaaay out on the end of the behavioral norms and it wouldn't matter if you showed them pictures of flowers and sand mandalas, they still want to have sex with children. because they are broken and don't understand that children are not sexual creatures. not because "i sawz it in a book derp"

    as for sex with animals, I wish you'd convince my damned dog of that as the horny little bastard keeps trying to have sex with my leg.

  13. Are you sure about that? by Yosho · · Score: 1

    Especially considering that the Everyday Life with Monster Girls series of manga is regularly in the best sellers list?

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  14. Yeah, CloudFlare is a specialist of censorship by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Troll

    CloudFlare stands in the way between you, and more and more of the internet, and they don't like TOR: try to browse with TOR, and many, many sites suddenly become "protected" by unsolvable captchas that get served every 3 pages - practically making those sites unavailable.

    CloudFlare is essentially passing judgment on who is allowed to access the site they front and how. So they sure don't have any lessons to give on free speech...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Yeah, CloudFlare is a specialist of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      CloudFlare blocks visits from endpoints that are common sources of malicious behaviour - unfortunately, that includes TOR endpoints for obvious reasons.

      The reality is that sites don't want to get attacked.

    2. Re:Yeah, CloudFlare is a specialist of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The captchas can't be solved except by computers though, so, there's that.

    3. Re:Yeah, CloudFlare is a specialist of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, 8chan is behind Cloudflare and it has Child Modelling threads on its main board.
      Can't be less censored than that without having full-on child porn.

      It also works with Tor.

    4. Re:Yeah, CloudFlare is a specialist of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived in China the past 6 years. Fuck CloudFlare. I can't access any website hosted by those assholes and I can't even solve the captcha because the lazy cocksuckers host it directly from Google, which also has parts blocked. Stupid assholes.

    5. Re:Yeah, CloudFlare is a specialist of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loading a page is not an "attack" or "malicious behavior". And if it's really true that there are thousands of Tor users trying to load the same page at once, then CloudFlare could just CACHE the damn page. It's less work for everyone.

      Plus, zero sympathy for people who send you into an infinite loop of captchas because you don't use JavaScript. Better to say "JS or GTFO" than to waste my time trying to guess whether that's an "m" or an "rn" before you send my response to the bit bucket.

  15. Monster Erotica? You mean this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. rational agrument? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "You can make a rational argument that if you're writing books fantasizing about having sex with animals or children, maybe that promotes a certain kind of behavior. ..."

     
    People have said the same thing about a lot of other stuff;
    racing video games: your going to speed IRL
    FPS video games: Your going to start shooting people IRL (how many times have we heard that one?)
    RPGs; your going to go nuts and think your a High Elf ranger fighting monsters IRL
    Read adult magazines/watch porn: your going to become a rapist IRL.
     
    And yet, to the best of my knowledge, there has never been a causal link proven despite years of studies.
     
    Prince probably freaked out because he got an erection looking at an anthropomorphized velociraptor.

  17. Behaviour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You can make a rational argument that if you're writing books [sic] fantasizing about having sex with animals or children, maybe that promotes a certain kind of behaviour."

    The same way as writing books about murder mystery or war will promote a certain kind of behaviour to kill ?

    Why don't we ban such books too? Oh, and let's ban history books as they may also promote a certain kind of behaviour to repeat...

    1. Re:Behaviour... by Drishmung · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    2. Re:Behaviour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all murders are crimes, some descriptions of murder are crimes, not all sex is legal, some description of sex are not. So the domain futilitycloset.com is good place for this all.

  18. commentsubjectsaredumb by Falos · · Score: 1

    > Then they came for the dinophiles, and I did not speak out because I was not a dinophile.

    I mean, it's not like you can jump straight to banning [insert] in porn, you gotta boil the frog slowly.

    For extra ridicule, put "banning blacks" in.

  19. Not the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon is a market. Regardless that it is online doesn't make it any different from any other store. Prince shouldn't even be comparing it with his own service.
    Should a Walmart sell porn? or a Target sell sex toys?
    Amazon can sell whatever they want, as long as it is legal to sell.

    And this is not an argument for or against such content. its just that demand will always produce a supplier. If Amazon doesn't supply you go to who does. You don't get mad at Amazon and cry censorship. Just as much as you don't cry censorship because a Barnes and Nobles isn't selling you the latest fashion clothing in BDSM.

  20. Gotta ask by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Does the dinosaur have to be 18 or over?

    1. Re:Gotta ask by edittard · · Score: 1

      I think you have to multiply by seven. Or is it divide? No, wait, maybe that's dogs.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  21. Poignant, in a way by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    "I worry about Jeff Bezos' bizarre obsession with dinosaur sex,"

    I'm starting to forget when a statement like this was never even contextually apropos, much less relevant to the topic, in a semi-mainstream news story. The times, they are a-getting unidentifiable.

    1. Re:Poignant, in a way by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to forget when a statement like this was never even contextually apropos, much less relevant to the topic, in a semi-mainstream news story. The times, they are a-getting unidentifiable.

      Lol, O Brave New World....

      -

      "I worry about Jeff Bezos' bizarre obsession with dinosaur sex,"

      I hear ya. That was a sentence I could never have expected or predicted to hear, no matter how long I lived.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re: Poignant, in a way by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Presumably at some point before they made live action pterydactyl porn.

  22. If you were a Dinosaur, My Love by RDW · · Score: 1

    http://www.apex-magazine.com/i...

    I know this story pissed off those guys who tried to rig the Hugo awards, but banning the whole genre seems a bit extreme.

    1. Re:If you were a Dinosaur, My Love by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I know this story pissed off those guys who tried to rig the Hugo awards, but banning the whole genre seems a bit extreme.

      It is unfortunately stories like that one which gave the puppies that tiny kernel of truth which made the message much more compelling. I mean, I hate to agree with the puppies, but that story was bad. It'a (a) not sci-fi or fantasy or magical realism or any of those things and (b) just plain mawkish.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  23. Kiddy Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cloudflare is the number one place shit you dont wanna click is hosted.

  24. Chuck Tingle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He seems to be doing quite well in the monster erotica and 5th world erotica genre.

  25. Poor logic by existentialvoid1061 · · Score: 0

    While I personally find the stuff to be indecent at best, who am I to tell anyone what is decent. This policy does not work because rigid 'moral' guidelines will never be just or effective. And the market will move somewhere else underground where it will change. For a good analogy refer to the digital 'Anna' or anorexia culture and it transformed due to censorship.

    1. Re:Poor logic by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      While I personally find the stuff to be indecent at best, who am I to tell anyone what is decent.

      Yeah, I think it's weird, but I don't see the harm in it. What kind of terrible things do people think will happen by allowing dino-porn?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Poor logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just about to post a link, but then I thought to myself, "am I even allowed to post a link to something like this?"

      So, here it is. Google pterodactyl sex plasmoids

      And then prepare the eye bleach before clicking the link

      You were warned.

    3. Re:Poor logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate you. I can't not google it.

  26. Don't forget Barney the Purle Dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love you
    You love me
    Let's hang Barney from a tree

    Not-so-auto -erotic asphyxiation.

  27. in case you are wondering WTF is monster erotica by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Vaginal Fantasy book club did "Taken By The T-Rex":
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  28. Meanwhile, CloudFlare blocks Tor heavily by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    CloudFlare blocks Tor in practice, by endlessly forcing Tor users to fill out captcha pages. How is that not censorship?

  29. Societal Priorities Are Weird: by Hartree · · Score: 2

    I doubt Amazon would ban a book detailing how to do a real world harm, say: A detailed manual on how to loot a corporate pension fund and defer the retirement health insurance payments until bankruptcy can be declared. All without getting prosecuted for it. (And, I'd agree that odious though it was, a book about it shouldn't be prohibited.)

    But, we can get all bent out of shape and restrict things, especially sex, that meets someone's definition of "icky" or "scary", regardless that it's fiction about things that do not exist outside of human imaginations.

    I'm reminded of a person who, when looking for a roommate at college was visibly overstressed by worry that I had a copy of the DnD Players Guide. He assured me that the demons could use the pictures on the cover to come into our world.

    I was glad he didn't want to be a roommate, as I was convinced he was mental.

    How is this getting bent out of shape over something fictional much different?

    1. Re:Societal Priorities Are Weird: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reminded of a person who, when looking for a roommate at college was visibly overstressed by worry that I had a copy of the DnD Players Guide. He assured me that the demons could use the pictures on the cover to come into our world.

      I would be worried about the fact that you might invite 5 or so of your geeky friends over all night playing DnD and swilling Jolt Cola and eating pizza and just making the whole place unlivable in general.

  30. Dinosex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even now, in a laboratory far away...

  31. What ban? It's still there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mobys.ws/12/24/christmas-2013/

    Don't worry, all that great Dino Erotica is still available...for Christmas! That's right, if you need a last minute gift for mem, you can still get that audiobook of 'Taken by the T-Rex for mom. Unfortunately NOT read by the author.

  32. Darwinian sales techniques by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    They obviously had to make way for the censorship fetish porn, such as the above summary.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  33. Dinosaur is so boring welcome squid overlords desu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Japan, monster porn, in the form of black and white "manga" comic books, are sold unrestricted even to 12 year olds and they openly read those on the train or subway. Usually the stories revolve around giant squids (!!!) using their tentacles to probe mini-skirt schoolgirls in every possible orifice. Apparently the readership consists of a slight majority of girls (!), but boys also widely read that filth.

    There was a proposal to cleanse such squid thingies and "chibi" pedo-manga off the bookshelves for better PR of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, but apparently the business is too much yen and the fanbase is too large to suppress. It's a pity the most christian cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were nuked, since that meant the japanese people lost any little connection they had with western morality and no brakes remained versus their perversions.

  34. Hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >You can make a rational argument that if you're writing books fantasizing about having sex with animals or children, maybe that promotes a certain kind of behavior.

    As someone who lives in the UK and masturbates to lolicon (so I admit I break the law), I've yet to go and molest a child.

    Maybe because I can tell the difference between fiction and reality; you know, like any other sane person.

    Besides, children are disgusting, loud, obnoxious little brats.

  35. WAIT! by sabbede · · Score: 1
    There's "erotica" about sex with dinosaurs that I could be reading right now instead of /.?

    What the hell am I wasting my time typing this for?

  36. TIL by cHiphead · · Score: 1

    TIL the CEO of CloudFlare is into Dinosaur sex stories.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  37. Bezos by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he saw something featuring Uncle Fester and thought it was parodying him?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. The infamous "Bob's Animal Farm" ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Featured live dinosaur sex. And I'm sure there are other such movies.

    My sig is not a joke. Birds are dinosaurs, for all practical meanings of "birds", "are", and "dinosaurs".

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"