Slashdot Mirror


Walmart Plays Catch-Up With Amazon

HughPickens.com writes: According to James B. Stewart in the NY Times, for the past 16 years Walmart has often acted as though it hoped Amazon would just go away. When Walmart announced last week that it was significantly increasing its investment in e-commerce, it tacitly acknowledged that it had fallen far behind Amazon in the race for online customers. Now, the magnitude of the task it faces has grown exponentially as e-commerce growth continues to surge globally. "Walmart.com has been severely mismanaged," says Burt P. Flickinger III. "Walmart would go a few years and invest strategically and significantly in e-commerce, then other years it wouldn't.Meanwhile, Amazon is making moves in e-commerce that's put Walmart so far behind that it might not be able to catch up for 10 more years, if ever."

In 1999, Amazon was a fledgling company with annual revenue of $1.6 billion; Walmart's was about $138 billion. By last year, Amazon's revenue was about 54 times what it was in 1999, nearly $89 billion, almost all of it from online sales. Walmart's was about three times what it was 15 years before, almost $486 billion, and only a small fraction of that — 2.5 percent, or $12.2 billion — came from Walmart.com. Walmart's superefficient distribution system — a function of its enormous volume and geographic reach — was long the secret to Walmart's immense profitability. Ravi Jariwala, a Walmart spokesman, says that Walmart is building vast new fulfillment centers and is rapidly enhancing its delivery capabilities to take advantage of its extensive store network to provide convenient in-store pickup and adds that 70 percent of the American population lives within five miles of a Walmart store. "This is where e-commerce is headed," says Jariwala, which is to a hybrid online/in-store model. "Customers want the accessibility and immediacy of a physical store," along with the benefits of online shopping.

130 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. brick and mortar is an assett by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As the summary suggests, Walmart does have an advantage in its distribution network and storefront locations. At a greatly-reduced cost, Walmart could very quickly compete with Amazon for Same-Day delivery service if that proves to be lucrative.

    Additionally, in the not-so-distant future, when autonomous vehicles become the norm, consumers could order online and send their own car to the Walmart distribution center to be loaded up with the groceries, etc. to reduce the cost of deliver.

    1. Re: brick and mortar is an assett by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      Yeah send my car to Wallyworld alone. Any convenience or cost savings will quickly be whittled away due to the performance of thier employees whether it be fuck ups in fulfilment or boogers on the door handle. They need to become a more professional business altogether online and off for this to work. Who can honestly view themselves typing in walmart.com with a straight face?

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re: brick and mortar is an assett by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      Last year, I bought some tires at Walmart using their ship-to-store program, and got them installed at their auto center. Here's how it went:
      Ship-to-store is the repurposed layaway counter, and isn't actively staffed. Instead, you ring the associate using a kiosk.
      No associate showed up. Had to ring at least twice. About 15-20 minutes in, an attendant working the floor asked what the deal was, and I guess he tracked someone down. I'm not sure if the notify attendant functionality was broken or the associate was at fault, but if that's the typical ship-to-store experience, I'll pass. Wheeled my Walmart.com-wrapped tires to the auto center, and they overcharged me $20 for installing "third-party" tires.

      Ship-to-store could work if you implement it like Amazon once discussed using lockers--you come in at any time 24/7, obtain the contents of your locker, and leave. Retail employees only add negative value, and should be kept as far as possible from fulfillment.

    3. Re:brick and mortar is an assett by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      in the not-so-distant future, when autonomous vehicles become the norm

      That's optimistic.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re: brick and mortar is an assett by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Maybe they mean in terms of geologic time.

      Point conceded.
      Archaeologists will find evidence of its creation in the same strata as Mr Fusion.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re: brick and mortar is an assett by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I have two walmarts within 20 minutes of my house. One is much larger, clean, well stocked, and staffed with mostly adults the other is a much older building it's always dirty, right next to the college, never has what you are looking for, staffed mostly by distracted students both college and highschool.

    6. Re:brick and mortar is an assett by jlp2097 · · Score: 1

      As a European, what's Walmart? But seriously, let me give you some more global perspective - besides UK, Japan, China and South Africa there is not really much of a Walmart presence outside of North and South America. They will never catch up to Amazon, which is present just about everywhere in the world.

      Amazon has the hell optimized out of their logistics and again, is present just about everywhere. There is not really much of an advantage (besides storefront locations) that Walmart has.

    7. Re:brick and mortar is an assett by balbus000 · · Score: 2

      In my not-so-distant future, autonomous vehicles that aren't owned by individuals will become the norm. So Walmart would send their autonomous vehicle to deliver my goods. And I would swipe a credit card or some better form of verification would happen that would allow the car to deposit my package when the car arrives in my driveway.

  2. Physical store advantage? by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Walmart believes "Customers want the accessibility and immediacy of a physical store." That is why their online business is doomed to fail. Yes, sometimes you just want it right now, but then you'll drive to Walmart or whatever local store will have it and buy it. But often you want the real online experience with unlimited selections and no hassle with trips. Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?

    Yes, Walmart has a huge and efficient distribution system, but can they really leverage that for online sales? When stocking stores, they ship large quantities to each store. For online sales, it's small quantities of a much larger variety. You have to support the customer who is the only one in the area buying that item just as well as you do the customer who buys the most popular item. I doubt their distribution system can adapt to that model.

    Walmart can try, but in order to beat Amazon at this point, they don't just have to match them, they have to be better. I don't think they even understand what better looks like, let alone have any way of getting there.

    1. Re:Physical store advantage? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Yep, agreed. Apparently, Walmart can't stop thinking of themselves as a brick and mortar store. I'm betting that this is why Amazon will continue to win in the online space.

      Fortunately for them, there are apparently plenty of people who still prefer to shop for things in a physical store.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Physical store advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then skip the online and just buy it at B&M. It's not like when an online order comes in they have a spare employee sitting idle desperate for items to put in Will-Call/"in-store pickup".

      When I tried using this shit show of a "feature": I purchased a laptop and had to stand in queue for 15-30 minutes while the Best Buy customer service reps waited for the credit history check on the low-income individuals standing in front of me in line. I could have just walked over to the Laptop section and grabbed the damn thing, but instead I got to watch some retard get rejected for a Best Buy credit card. I finally got to the counter after they had been denied(the disappointment/shame on their faces was the best part about this experience) and they tried to hand me what was obviously the most abused/beat-up box they had on the shelves. This was clearly the one which they couldn't sell to normal customers because nobody wanted the one with smashed corners so they picked over it every time.

      Best-Buy "in-store pickup" experience: A) dumping grounds for lowest quality product in inventory B) stand in a neglected customer service queue with poor people.

      No fucking thanks!

    3. Re:Physical store advantage? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Walmart has a huge and efficient distribution system, but can they really leverage that for online sales? When stocking stores, they ship large quantities to each store. For online sales, it's small quantities of a much larger variety. You have to support the customer who is the only one in the area buying that item just as well as you do the customer who buys the most popular item. I doubt their distribution system can adapt to that model.

      Walmart can try, but in order to beat Amazon at this point, they don't just have to match them, they have to be better. I don't think they even understand what better looks like, let alone have any way of getting there.

      The best option would be to piggyback off their massive distribution network and ubiquitous physical presence to facilitate delivery times. Use your existing distribution network to delivery ordered items to the nearest (or most efficiently located based on warehouse and destination locations) retail store and then have an insourced (or at least Walmart branded) delivery driver co-located with the store to make deliveries (this would probably be cheapest if limited to stores with high online order volume) or make an agreement with UPS/FedEx/DHL etc to do store-to-door delivery. Essentially you can turn the local store into the final node of the delivery chain.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Physical store advantage? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Well lately Amazon's prices have been coming in between 1.5 and 5 times the cost of what it would cost to go get the same product at the store, and that's before shipping. Even if you find something that's going to cost about what it would at a local B&M, by the time they tack on S&H, you're paying $20-$30 more for it. For the same price, Walmart could just locate the closest store to your house and have some dude drive it to you. Even if that dude can only make one such delivery an hour, my average Amazon shipping cost is about 3 times what that guy makes in an hour. At the very least, a little competition might keep Amazon honest.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Physical store advantage? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Even if that dude can only make one such delivery an hour, my average Amazon shipping cost is about 3 times what that guy makes in an hour. At the very least, a little competition might keep Amazon honest.

      I can't remember the last time I actually paid for shipping on Amazon, since I have Prime (which only costs around $100). Assuming the driver makes minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, you are paying $21.75 every time you make an Amazon order. So, assuming you order something off Amazon at least 4-5 times a year, why aren't you just paying for Prime?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Physical store advantage? by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      It gets even worse for Wal-Mart, now that Amazon has its Prime Now service; which delivers in 2 hours (or 1 hour for a fee).

      The nearest Wal-Mart to me is a 25 minute drive, without counting traffic - and I don't own a car. It's an hour by bus. For me, that's two hours spent just traveling to and from the store. Even if you drive, most people don't fancy spending an hour driving back & forth for a shopping trip.

      Even if I need something *right now*, it's quicker and easier for me to order it online and get it delivered directly to my door than it is to commute to Wal-Mart, navigate the store & hope they'll have what I need, check out & return home. The only reason for me to go to the physical store is if they win on A) cost (which is sometimes true) or B) you need to try it on or otherwise physically handle it before you buy.

    7. Re:Physical store advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?"

      So that you don't have to wait for the package to be delievered on a particular day? Not everyone works at home.

      "Yes, Walmart has a huge and efficient distribution system, but can they really leverage that for online sales?"

      Have you never used walmart.com ship-to-store? I think they try to leverage it but the times I've ordered stuff that was at a different store to be sent to my local store they send it by UPS or other carrier at no additional cost to me.

    8. Re:Physical store advantage? by dslauson · · Score: 1

      Part of the genius of Amazon Prime is that it capitalizes on the sunk cost fallacy. I (happily) give them $100/yr to allow me to shop there with no shipping costs, and, by god, I'm going to get my money's worth. I'm not going to squander my sunk costs by shopping at some brick-and-mortar store! IMO, this is one of the biggest hurdles Walmart has to overcome.

      I think Walmart is right that accessibility and immediacy is sometimes desirable. If I blow a tire on my bike and I want to ride to work tomorrow, I'm still heading to a brick-and-mortar store. I can grab a few groceries while I'm there.

      I do also think they could leverage their distribution network. There's a Walmart on pretty much everybody's way home from work, and it's only a minor inconvenience to stop in to pick something up. I've done it before for larger items that Amazon wouldn't ship free.

      But that Prime, though! I love it, and I wouldn't give it up, and there's no way I'd pay somebody else for a similar service in addition to it. That's where they've really got me. That's how Amazon went from something I only used for hard-to-find items to my go-to vendor for practically everything.

    9. Re:Physical store advantage? by crow · · Score: 1

      You identified one key advantage Walmart has: Convenient returns. It's much easier to return to a store than to ship a return. If I were in charge of etail at Walmart, you can bet that would at the top of the list to advertise.

    10. Re:Physical store advantage? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

      any why would i want to pay $99 a year for shipping when i can simply drive to the store that day?

    11. Re:Physical store advantage? by crow · · Score: 1

      I thought that Amazon was now collecting sales taxes in most states. Wikipedia says Amazon only collets in 26 states. Google tells me that 5 other states don't have sales tax. So yes, Amazon bypasses sales tax in 19 states.

    12. Re:Physical store advantage? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, Walmart has a huge and efficient distribution system, but can they really leverage that for online sales?

      sure. They can make every store a fulfillment center.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Physical store advantage? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well lately Amazon's prices have been coming in between 1.5 and 5 times the cost of what it would cost to go get the same product at the store,

      Can you provide some real-world examples you've run into while shopping online recently? That sounds a little bollocks-y. I'd believe 1.2 times, 1.5 times, that sort of thing. Usually I get things via eBay because the ultimately best prices are there, but often I see them for almost the same final shipped price on Amazon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Physical store advantage? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for them, there are apparently plenty of people who still prefer to shop for things in a physical store.

      Last time I was on vacation we were thrilled to discover a Walmart Neighborhood Market across street from our condo.

      We could buy beer, wine, groceries .. all right across the street. The other Walmart locations had sunscreen, clothes, BBQ stuff, batteries ... and beer, wine, groceries, and everything else you'd expect.

      Walmart has correctly identified that there will always be things people will buy at brick and mortar stores.

      Unless you are looking for something very specific, and for which you can spend some time comparison shopping to know what it is you're looking for, online shopping is limited to specific kinds of purchases.

      Could Walmart move more into online shopping? Sure, probably. Will they ever stop being a brick and mortar store? No way in hell.

      It's not like online shopping is going to replace actual physical stores.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:Physical store advantage? by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      Yes, Walmart has a huge and efficient distribution system, but can they really leverage that for online sales? When stocking stores, they ship large quantities to each store. For online sales, it's small quantities of a much larger variety. You have to support the customer who is the only one in the area buying that item just as well as you do the customer who buys the most popular item.

      Or you "ship to store" for the customer who is the only one in the area, do not charge them shipping, do no risk theft of the package from the customer's door, and likely reduce the risk of damage from the 'special' handling that only a FedEx contract delivery person can provide.

      Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?

      Why don't you ask Amazon?

      Then add the ability to verify immediate inventory of an item and that it will be reserved for you behind a counter when you get there in about an hour. Which Amazon cannot do. At all.

      It's as if you've completely missed the fact that stores like Best Buy, Microcenter, Target, Wal-Mart and the like have been doing this for years.

    16. Re:Physical store advantage? by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      The physical store advantage goes to Dollar General. Amazon is decimating Walmart on one demographic and Dollar General is killing them on the rest.

    17. Re:Physical store advantage? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?

      The only thing I can think of, would be: If I'm driving over there anyway, for my non-online purchases (groceries).

      I have a few grocery stores that I visit fairly often, including one that I visit nearly every week. (None of them happen to be Wal-Mart but for the sake of the arugment, let's pretend one of them is.) I'm never going to buy beer or porkchops or bread online from Amazon, but if I were at my grocer's checkout, and after I ran my "discount" tracking-cookie consumer-analytics card, the checker were to say, "Oh, Mr. Sloppy, your online-shopping crap has arrived," and then it somehow got dumped into my cart, I guess that'd be pretty cool.

      That just means my grocer is somehow the bulk shipping destination (a truck with a lot of peoples' orders pulls up to it, instead of driving all over the the neighborhood), and then they have to store it until I show up for my weekly visit, and ..

      ..you know, this actually sounds like a lot of expense and trouble for them. I'm skeptical that it'd be cheaper. But if somehow it were cheaper than having a guy drive all over town delivering packages, ok, I'm game. (But you're right, I think. This ain't happening.)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    18. Re:Physical store advantage? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Plus. If we're going to be told what customers want...
      Customers want to NOT shop at Walmart.

    19. Re:Physical store advantage? by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      Can't vouch for 5 times the cost, but often the same product is significantly cheaper through Walmart, and is delivered quicker.

      http://www.amazon.com/Everlast...

      http://www.walmart.com/ip/Ever...

      And most recently, as Amazon is pushing it's subscription service, there are products Amazon refuses to sell unless you join Prime (Prime Pantry items being the most egregious). Only the hubris Jeff Bezos can justify the logic in not selling things.

      Amazon's only grace at this point is near one-stop shopping, but increasingly on terms of price, total ease (especially if there is the possibility of a return involved), and speed of delivery (Walmart usually takes 3-5 days, Amazon is averaging 2 weeks), other retailers have got them beat.

    20. Re:Physical store advantage? by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Yes - I agree that they are still thinking about it wrong. The reason that I use local pickup is because I want it now - today - like in the next 30 minutes. And that's the only option the store provides.

      Now - if I could get somebody to drive it over to my house and Deliver it, I would. I shop online to see what is available in a lower stress env (plus I'm thinking about the item Now! Not add to Shopping-List, but Add to Cart!). Of course - rarely do I actually need it Now -- rather today - by 5pm. So load up that truck and bring it today---I can wait for bulk delivery to my neighborhood. Save me the trip and the lines.

      I don't *want* Local Pickup. But because that's all that is available when "I need it now" then that's what I use.

      Besides - standing in line to checkout at Walmart sucks. My god they have long slow moving lines. So much so that I would rather use Amazon Prime and *wait* two days than shop locally. That's how much it rubs me the wrong way, I avoid Walmart because of the long lines. There are more people standing in the front of the store waiting to checkout than browsing the shelves - if Local Pickup means standing in line to ... pickup...ain't gonna use that either.

    21. Re:Physical store advantage? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?

      To have it NOW, or as soon as now as I can. If I can pay a competitive ecommerce price and have it now, why would I wait 2 days for Amazon Prime to deliver it?

      If I don't need it now, then I can have it shipped just like any other ecommerce site.

    22. Re:Physical store advantage? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      sure. They can make every store a fulfillment center.

      I think it might be too late for Wal-Mart. They've lost a couple hundred million dollars in market capitalization last year and for them to go all-out as an Amazon killer would require them to close a bunch of stores and turn them into distribution centers.

      It's a completely different model than they have now.

      Plus, Wal-Mart stores are funky. Sure, a lot of people shop there, but nobody likes shopping there.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    23. Re:Physical store advantage? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Well lately Amazon's prices have been coming in between 1.5 and 5 times the cost of what it would cost to go get the same product at the store, and that's before shipping.

      I've found Amazon pretty price-competitive. Sometimes more for some items, sometimes less. When Amazon is less, some stores (like Target) will price match if you show them the Amazon listing on your phone.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    24. Re:Physical store advantage? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Can't vouch for 5 times the cost, but often the same product is significantly cheaper through Walmart, and is delivered quicker.

      I guess we'll never know, I enabled all the scripts I'm going to enable on their site, and I still didn't get a price. I guess that's why I've never bought anything from walmart.com. It's also the same reason why I never bought anything from sears.com.

      You are aware that many times the Walmart version of a product is inferior, right? Small suppliers can't get away with that, but the big ones that are in a better position to dictate terms supply walmart with shitty product under different SKUs that aren't available at other retail outlets. For example, never buy tires at Wal-Mart, they are literally different products than what you find elsewhere. That's not true for the expensive tires with fancy, well-known names; I don't mean the brand names, I mean the model names. however, in that case, you're not saving any money. In fact, they're robbing you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re: Physical store advantage? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I like shopping at Walmart.

      It's not a form of entertainment, and my wife hates it, but I enjoy checking it out.

      It definitely has a more 'diverse' customer base than more upscale stores, but I am not an elitist.

    26. Re:Physical store advantage? by maeka · · Score: 1

      Yes, Walmart has a huge and efficient distribution system, but can they really leverage that for online sales? When stocking stores, they ship large quantities to each store. For online sales, it's small quantities of a much larger variety. You have to support the customer who is the only one in the area buying that item just as well as you do the customer who buys the most popular item. I doubt their distribution system can adapt to that model.

      What you're missing with this line of thought is the proper comparison.

      Walmart's huge and efficient distribution system, which you rightfully point out is efficient at moving large quantities, is not competition for the Amazon business model.

      It is competition for the Amazon + UPS/USPS business model.

      WalMart can leverage their back end to get products very close to customers very cheaply. They then simply need to solve the last (5) mile(s) problem. Amazon relies on external companies (UPS/USPS/FedEx) to do this and while they are creating same-day delivery infrastructure in-house in major metropolitan areas they have nowhere near the population coverage WalMart already has.

    27. Re:Physical store advantage? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      You aren't paying to prevent one trip, you're paying for every trip to the store. As well as their streaming video service.

      The $99 + video streaming is weighed against your time, your gas money, and the marginal maintenance costs on your vehicle, and two days of latency.

      For me, my time is worth a lot more to me, in most cases, than the a minor shipping latency. If I didn't have it at all yesterday I probably don't need it today either. It's a rare emergency that getting more stuff a day earlier is worth even 5 minutes of my time.

    28. Re:Physical store advantage? by lgw · · Score: 1

      any why would i want to pay $99 a year for shipping when i can simply drive to the store that day?

      How much stuff do you buy in your life. Driving to the store and back is the least efficient way (transportation-wise) to get anything, compared to any sort of route where multiple packages get delivered.

      $99 a year is like 0.6-0.7 gallons of gas a week. Doesn't take much to come out ahead. I'll still shop at B&M stores within a couple blocks of my place, but that's a different order of convenience than the Target 20 minutes away.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:Physical store advantage? by lgw · · Score: 1

      m never going to buy beer or porkchops or bread online from Amazon

      .

      I bought bread online from Amazon today, but I'm in an area where Amazon Fresh is available. It's not a full selection of groceries (though they do have beer, and lots of produce), but there's a lot there, with same/next-day delivery, in a refrigerated truck, or by bicycle+trailer courier in downtown Seattle. It was really a "too good to be true" deal, and now they're charging $300 a year in some sort of double-secret-Prime in order to get that service. Guess they weren't making it work at the price.

      Anyhow, never say never: the world is changing fast. A pork-chop-carrying drone (trailed by all the neighborhood dogs, no doubt) may be in your future.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    30. Re:Physical store advantage? by quetwo · · Score: 1

      And that's assuming they get it right. The last two times (and these will be the last two times) I tried to do the online order, pick up from the store at Best Buy, I waited > 30 minutes in line to pick up the order, only to be told that they didn't have the item in stock (then why did you email me saying it was ready!), or if they pick it, they pull the open-box model and try and pass it off as new. In both cases they had new, unopened items on the shelf, and both required them to cancel my order and do a regular purchase. Luckily, only one of the two times they charged my card twice.

    31. Re:Physical store advantage? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree that brick and mortar will likely always have a place. My last visit to a Walmart was when I was traveling in another state as well.

      Grocery shopping is something I don't mind doing in person. I'll often get dinner ideas when I spot a cut of meat, a particular sauce, or some fruits or veggies. Drug stores are handy when I need some toiletries, and they're really handy when I'm sick and need some medicine now, and not three days from now. I'd imagine a lot of people (other than me) enjoy shopping for clothes, and I'd bet a big part of that is browsing the selection and trying things on with your friends. Hardware stores are convenient when you need to ask some questions about a project. And who would want to buy a couch without sitting in it first, or a bed without lying on it?

      Honestly, I'm not even sure there's a reason Walmart really needs to compete in the online space. They probably just hate the thought of giving up *any* retail marketshare without a fight.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    32. Re:Physical store advantage? by doug141 · · Score: 1

      Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?

      Because you want it today, at the online sale price.

    33. Re:Physical store advantage? by indytx · · Score: 1

      Walmart believes "Customers want the accessibility and immediacy of a physical store." That is why their online business is doomed to fail. Yes, sometimes you just want it right now, but then you'll drive to Walmart or whatever local store will have it and buy it. But often you want the real online experience with unlimited selections and no hassle with trips. Why would I buy something online and then drive to pick it up?

      Completely agree with this. At my local Walmart, if I order something for in-store pickup, I drive there, park, go inside, and then walk to the BACK of the store, where I wait for an associate. If it's something large, I have to leave, go to my car, drive around to the rear of the store and wait outside at a door until an associate comes out with my package and doesn't help me load it. Or, I can order from Amazon and have UPS deliver it to my door in a couple of days. The immediacy they're talking about kills an hour of my time.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
  3. "says Burt P. Flickinger III" by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    His surname isn't his fault, but putting Roman numerals after it is.

    If you're not a king or queen, that's a strong indicator you have more ego than brains.

    1. Re:"says Burt P. Flickinger III" by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I've known no less than 3 people who were "the third" and put the "III" after their name.

      For legal purposes, and not confusing the shit out of everybody, knowing the difference between "Robert Smith", "Bob Smith Jr.", and "Little Bobby Smith" can be an actual thing.

      By the time you're "the third", the roman numerals are really the only way to do it.

      The real problem is parents who feel the need to make their children "the third", thereby necessitating this in the first place. I generally think that ego is attributable to the previous generation than the poor schmuck who has to do it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:"says Burt P. Flickinger III" by chilenexus · · Score: 1

      There's an 'r' in there?

    3. Re:"says Burt P. Flickinger III" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The real problem is parents who feel the need to make their children "the third", thereby necessitating this in the first place. I generally think that ego is attributable to the previous generation than the poor schmuck who has to do it.

      My father was a III and he named his first son the IVth. It's a family name, it's not just ego. I'm just glad I didn't get the name. My dad was an asshole. So's my eldest half-brother, who got it. He can have it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:"says Burt P. Flickinger III" by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      It's a family name, it's not just ego

      Look, let's be honest here ... at that point, "family name" means "multiple generations of ego".

      Or, you do what George Foreman did, and name all your kids after yourself. He's got a Jr, an III, an IV, a V, and a VI.

      It's just a lot more ego. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:"says Burt P. Flickinger III" by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Not the most FAMOUS Robert Smith.

  4. Amazon is dead by slashdice · · Score: 1

    Let's face the facts: walmart uses node.js. It's webscale. What does amazon use? Java or c++ or something like that. Not webscale! Amazon should probably just close their doors and give the money back to their investors. It is literally impossible to beat node.js. I mean, to be a java programmer, you have to go to college and shit. To be a rockstar ninja javascript programmer, all you need is a 6-week code bootcamp.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  5. Re:Great 5 stars! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    NOPE!

    The LAST thing I want to do is step foot in a Walmart. Even before I had a medical excuse to stay away from B&M stores, I found Walmart a most depressing experience.

    If Walmart really wants to leap-frog Amazon then they can home deliver the things that Amazon can't.

    Currently Walmart's raison d'ÃÂtre is being the option for cheapskates. If they can't beat Amazon on price, they are going to lose because walking to your front door is always more convenient then schlepping anywhere.

    "In store pickup" is just a lame compromise that everyone else already does anyways.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  6. Walmart can pay it's wokers less then Amazon by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Walmart can pay it's workers less then Amazon and pass part of the saving after the ceo's cut.

    1. Re:Walmart can pay it's wokers less then Amazon by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Walmart's pay is just as bad / they don't give there worker meany hours. They also try calling them partners to get out of OT.

    2. Re:Walmart can pay it's wokers less then Amazon by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Like shit, but like slightly more valuable shit than WalMart employees. At least you don't have to put up with customers screaming at you (while you patiently smile in a friendly, non-threatening way); and you get a couple more bucks-per-hour.

  7. Re:Great 5 stars! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    They keep forgetting ONE BIG reason people order from Amazon.com.

    You don't have to pay Sales Tax on the items.

    Yes, I know you are supposed to pay use taxes in most states, but seriously, who does that?

    In my area, local plus state sales tax is in the upper 9.x% range....when I buy a large ticket item online, I save a substantial amount of $$. I'd have to pay that sales tax if I bought the same item on Walmart.com or picked it up in the store.

    I know that someday this will come to an end, but in the meantime, I'd have to guess a LARGE number of people order from Amazon and others to avoid high sales tax in states that charge it....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  8. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    That seems especially weird since, in addition to annoying you, the copy that they wanted $30 for is the one that they've already paid to ship to a retail location and dedicate shelf space to, while the one that they'll sell you for $20 would have to be shipped specially(presumably aggregated as much as possible with any other orders set to be delivered to that store; but not a regularly scheduled delivery) and is presumably taking up cheaper warehouse space.
    br. Was it a new release? The only way that seems like a sensible plan is if you suspect that enough customers are in need of instant gratification and don't have other options for getting it(eg. not yet on Netflix, hulu, ITMS, whatever).

  9. They need online pickup to work at night by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    So far my spouses and mine experience with the online pickup section of their stores is that at night the Walmart employees really hope that no one will show up and just abandon that little room of the store. The first thing that needs to happen is to have fast service at the online pickup room %100 of the time.

    1. Re:They need online pickup to work at night by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Walmart employees really hope that no one will show up and just abandon that

      I'm sorry, is this different from any of the rest of it?

      My general experience is trying to find someone help you and getting told "oh, I don't work in this department".

      Oh yeah, then who the hell does? You're the only employee anywhere near this department. Oh, I see, your job is to figure out how to block as many fucking aisles as possible so people can't get through.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:They need online pickup to work at night by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      That's part of the experience when you select the lowest cost provider.

    3. Re:They need online pickup to work at night by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, is this different from any of the rest of it?

      For the rest of the experience, I can get by without an employee. I can't do online pickup, without an employee around.

    4. Re:They need online pickup to work at night by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I have two walmarts within a bout 20 minutes of my house one is bright, shiny, new, and exactly what they advertise with smiling employees ready to help, the other is dirty, old, and staffed with part time college and highschool students... Thankfully the nice one is closer.

  10. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by ezelkow1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not only that but usually you could select same day pick up at the store your in, wait around until you got the 'ready' email, walk to the back of the store and pick up the one you were looking at.

    I did this for a carpet cleaner walmart had, 100$ less online, but they refused to sell it to me at their online price. I had to order it from my phone, select the store I was at, then wander around for 45min until I got the 'order ready' email, then walk to the back of the store and pick up the same unit I had just been looking at.

    Ill never understand why B&M stores always treat their online segment as a whole other business rather than integrate properly

  11. Re:Great 5 stars! by KFK2 · · Score: 1

    It's already come to an end in a bunch of states. Items sold by Amazon (not just fulfilled by Amazon) are now taxed in my state. Items sold by third parties are also taxed if that third party is in the same state as the destination.

  12. Re:Great 5 stars! by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    They keep forgetting ONE BIG reason people order from Amazon.com.

    You don't have to pay Sales Tax on the items.

    Yes, I know you are supposed to pay use taxes in most states, but seriously, who does that?

    In my area, local plus state sales tax is in the upper 9.x% range....when I buy a large ticket item online, I save a substantial amount of $$. I'd have to pay that sales tax if I bought the same item on Walmart.com or picked it up in the store.

    I know that someday this will come to an end, but in the meantime, I'd have to guess a LARGE number of people order from Amazon and others to avoid high sales tax in states that charge it....

    Amazon collects sales tax in most states now:

    Items sold by Amazon.com LLC, or its subsidiaries, and shipped to destinations in the following states are subject to tax:

    Arizona Indiana Minnesota Ohio West Virginia
    California Kansas Nevada Pennsylvania Wisconsin
    Connecticut Kentucky New Jersey Tennessee
    Florida Maryland New York Texas
    Georgia Massachusetts North Carolina Virginia
    Illinois Michigan North Dakota Washington

    My use of Amazon didn't go down after they started collecting sales tax -- I use Amazon for the convenience. It's still possible to avoid the sales tax collection by buying from an out of state Amazon Marketplace seller, but I've had so many bad experiences with them (obviously used products sold as new, broken product (in a box that someone wrote "Bad" on, product with missing pieces, etc) that unless at product is fulfilled by Amazon I rarely buy from a marketplace seller.

  13. Gotta feel bad for Wal-mart by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    It's got to be hard to catch up to somebody who is so far behind you. You'd have to sell all the way to infinity, go back to negative infinity and then catch up to the $12 billion in sales that Amazon does.
    There is a lot of "me, me, me, now, now, now" in American culture. Wal-mart will always have a place as long as people can't stand to wait two days over instant gratification.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Gotta feel bad for Wal-mart by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      Wal-mart will always have a place as long as people can't stand to wait two days over instant gratification.

      Try Amazon same-day delivery. It's amazing what they can deliver within a few hours!

      I don't use it often, but when I need to it's great. Especially since you never know if the local Wal-Mart will actually have stock.

    2. Re:Gotta feel bad for Wal-mart by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a hard time taking Walmart seriously when it comes to instant gratification. If I want anything fast I'll go to just about any other store first, because those other stores are more likely to actually have cashiers ready to work. Whenever I go to Walmart half my time in the store is spent waiting in line to check out.

  14. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by bws111 · · Score: 1

    Seriously? You know that thing you were in when you saw to $28 price? That costs actual money. You know, little things like rent, utilities, employees, shrinkage, inventory costs, etc. You know where the money to pay that comes from? From the things they sell in the store! Amazing!!

    Of course, they could have the same price for in-store and online, but that means their online prices would not be competitive with Amazon, who does not have to cover the cost of having stores.

    Is that really that difficult to figure out?

  15. Yeah, right by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Like I'm going to do business with a company that is even more obnoxious and evil than Amazon.

  16. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    LOL, my wife did something like this to me ... I was in a bookstore, and I was like "I want to buy this book".

    She whips out her phone, looks it up on Amazon, finds it for less money, orders it, and says "it'll be delivered in two days".

    I'm standing there like an idiot wondering WTF happened. Now we often check her phone while in a store.

    And, yes, we've seen cases where the on-line price doesn't match the store price and they won't match.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  17. Walmart app tells you which -aisle- it's in stock by raymorris · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Walmart app tells you not only which store has it in stock, but which aisle it's on.

    Btw they dropped the hyphen from their name about 15 years ago.

  18. Table Risers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I needed some plastic table risers to raise a table a little. Tried Walmart.com. Website was useless regarding whether or not a local store had what I needed. I went to local WalMart. Forty-five minutes of combing the store on my own, then asking three different employees, two of which happened to be managers, they eventually showed me where the risers would be.... if they had them. Apparently, they were all out. Wasted an hour+ of my time.

    Went to Amazon. Typed 'Table Riser". Clicked the one I wanted, Add to Cart, Checkout. 1 minute of my time. Showed up next day, free shipping.

  19. Why the Ads? by bartle · · Score: 1
    The thing that seems extremely strange to me about the walmart.com website is the sheer number of ads. And I don't mean ads for products that Walmart sells, I mean they're selling ad space for companies like Avis and Equifax through AdChoices. The result of this, for me at least, is that their site runs incredibly slow.

    I invite people to navigate to the walmart.com site and take a look. What are they trying to do there? Is it that the walmart.com team is expected to be financially self supported? I would not expect a company that is as large and successful as Walmart to be insisting on something that surely can't be bringing in much money while undercutting their future.

    1. Re:Why the Ads? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      A Slashdot reader who doesn't user any form of ad blocking?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  20. Revenue != Profit by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amazon hasn't ever made a significant profit. What point am I trying to make? I have no idea but it's an important one!

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Revenue != Profit by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter to Walmart whether or not Amazon is making a profit. So long as Amazon is doing business with customers that would otherwise take that business to Walmart, they are losing out. It's a lost sales situation

    2. Re:Revenue != Profit by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      Amazon hasn't ever made a significant profit. What point am I trying to make? I have no idea but it's an important one!

      I don't know what point you were making, but the lesson I'd take from this is that Amazon has been continuously betting on the idea that "cornering the market" is more important than current profits. They don't need to make a profit as long as they keep expanding and looking like they're going to achieve complete market dominance -- because if they do, they have a system in place that no one else does and will be in a place to take in profits for a long time (at least a long time in the internet economy timescale). Investors are betting on "future potential."

      But of course they're also betting that no one like Walmart can beat them. Walmart is still much bigger than Amazon (as TFS says, well over 5 times as much as Amazon in revenue, with about 1/7th of Amazon's current revenues already in online sales), and if Walmart decides to try to beat Amazon at the online game, they have a fighting chance of coming out ahead.

      Since Amazon's growth depends on keeping up the mystique with investors that they will "win the online game" in the long run, any serious doubt about that could spell disaster. Investors might get spooked about the zero profit record and start wondering whether Amazon really is viable in a competitive environment. Those are the questions Amazon execs probably don't want anyone asking -- but people will start asking if a serious and capable contender to Amazon shows up. Walmart certainly has the resources to do it... it's just a question of whether they can direct them in a way to pose enough of a threat to make Amazon investors flinch.

    3. Re:Revenue != Profit by crackspackle · · Score: 1

      Amazon hasn't ever made a significant profit. What point am I trying to make? I have no idea but it's an important one!

      The reason Amazon 'hasn't made a profit is because they've plowed it back into building a 21st century and beyond IT and logistics infrastructure to support their growth. That's fair competition. What bugs me is Amazon's use of software patents to stifle their competitors and I wonder how that will affect Wal-mart. as they try to play catch up. I am sure Amazon has done some unique stuff but a lot of what I've seen is obvious, at least if your looking to solve the problem. One-clcik is just a shining example of this.

  21. Forget Amazon; they can't even Match Home Depot by random+coward · · Score: 1

    They maybe should set their sites on trying to match Home Depot. They are doing the model that Walmart purports to be going after. The difference being that when I do a buy and pickup at store; it actually gets picked and is waiting for me at Home Depot, but not so at Walmart. The online and in store stock db matches on Home Depot, but not at Walmart.

    I guess it comes down to; Walmart's business plan could work and be successful; however to be able to execute they have to have store managers that are competent, and that seems to be against their policy.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Merchandise Quality by tomhath · · Score: 4, Informative

    Walmart was built on quality, name brand merchandise at low prices. At some point the MBAs took over and decided it was better to direct source merchandise from offshore manufacturers and slap their own label on it; they also beat down the name brand suppliers to shrink packages and cut corners to lower the price. They are now seeing what happens when you chase short term profits and drive off long term customers.

  24. Re:Great 5 stars! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have to be biased against walmart to feel that way. It's just like any other supermarket. Maybe whole foods makes you feel better because they give you the impression that what you're eating there is healthier (spoiler: It's not. I've worked for a major food distributor and we sold them the same stuff we sold walmart when they ordered the same category of items.) The only difference is whole foods refuses to carry certain foods citing health concerns (though there's no actual scientific basis behind their ban list) and they charge you about four times as much. But if paying four times as much makes people feel better, then to each his own I say.

    Anyways, two major reasons I don't buy from walmart most of the time:

    - Amazon usually has better prices and the selection is much bigger.
    - Walmart rather annoyingly doesn't honor their own website's prices in store. If you want their online price, you have to buy it online and then wait a few hours to pick it up in store.

    That said, I could see myself springing for Walmart instead of Amazon if they did something like this:

    - Greatly expand product selection
    - Day after or second day after delivery of your item to the local store
    - No "prime" style subscription required (I only use mine for the free shipping and nothing else, I have never really liked prime video or any of the other services.)

  25. Re:Great 5 stars! by TWX · · Score: 1

    I don't think that brick-and-mortar retailers like Walmart will really ever get how to do online commerce.

    Hell, friggin' Sears, that operated one of the most successful catalog businesses that we've ever seen, essentially closed-down their catalog service. Sears could have been what Amazon now is, and probably have been even more successful with it, as Sears has physical presence in so many markets that it would have been easy for them to adapt their distribution model to quick-turnaround shipping and home delivery. They could have offered next-day or same-day home delivery for many more products in many more markets than Amazon can based on their retail locations, and could have offered more total products out of their regional distribution facilities for more markets quicker than Amazon can.

    Unfortunately they never figured out how to make an online store that didn't suck. Then they got bought by K-Mart (which took their name for itself) and started making their division compete amongst each other, and the whole thing is falling apart.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  26. Walmart ship-to-store sucks! by dhalsim2 · · Score: 1

    It's really interesting that this article just came out. I just got back from Walmart where I was attempting to pickup my son's birthday gift. It took me over an hour of waiting to get it. The online system never sent me an email that it was ready for pick up, but instead said that it had already been picked up. It even gave me the option to return it. I went into the store to figure out what was happening. It hadn't been picked up, but it took them over an hour to find the item.

    What more disappointing is that this wasn't an isolated incidence. Over half of the time that I have items shipped to the store, I have a similar experience. Last time it took them two hours to find my package, and that was after I had received an email asking me to go pick it up!

    As I wait, I see other customers having to go through the same thing.

  27. I had no idea Amazon was that bad off by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Amazon is making moves in e-commerce that's put Walmart so far behind that it might not be able to catch up for 10 more years, if ever."

    In 1999, Amazon was a fledgling company with annual revenue of $1.6 billion; Walmart's was about $138 billion. By last year, Amazon's revenue was about 54 times what it was in 1999, nearly $89 billion, almost all of it from online sales. Walmart's was about three times what it was 15 years before, almost $486 billion, and only a small fraction of that â" 2.5 percent, or $12.2 billion â" came from Walmart.com.

    That's not how I'd interpret those numbers. Amazon is is burning cash (have yet to post a profit) and after 15 years they've managed to increase their online sales to $89 billion. Walmart isn't even trying and they've managed to reach $12.2 billion in online sales - 1/7th Amazon's. Furthermore, the growth of Walmart's retail sales, $486 - $138 - $12.2 = $336 billion, is nearly 4x Amazon's growth in those 15 years.

    I love Amazon and I'm a long-time Prime member. But until this story I had no idea growth in retail sales was far outstripping growth in online sales. Looking up some graphs, I see now that the stories I'd been reading about how online sales were "catching up" to retail sales were based on percentage growth, not actual dollar growth. And that as a flat dollar amount, retail sales have in fact been growing far more than online sales.

    Some of Amazon's strategic moves that had been head-scratchers now make sense. Like how they agreed to charge sales tax so they could establish warehouses and depots in most states. Or the crazy idea of delivery by drone. They're trying to crack into that retail market with same-day delivery.

    1. Re:I had no idea Amazon was that bad off by random+coward · · Score: 1

      In that time frame Walmart entered the Grocery retain business. Their Revenue is $486B but their margins dropped drastically.

    2. Re:I had no idea Amazon was that bad off by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      "Amazon is is burning cash (have yet to post a profit)"

      Where did you hear that? I'm fairly certain that they've had profitable quarters during their 20 year history.

      https://ycharts.com/companies/...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re:I had no idea Amazon was that bad off by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      hmmm.... and I'm sure they post a *large* profit on certain days if you were able to split hairs that finely. But that chart sure looks like they bounce around 0% with no significant profit over any year. So I guess it boils down to the statement of "never" and how frequently that is assessed. If GP is overstating things it isn't by much.

    4. Re:I had no idea Amazon was that bad off by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it looks like years they definitely end up in the black sometimes, even if not by much (and not enough to cover losses from the previous years). But profit is profit. :-)

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  28. In Store Pickup by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Walmart is building vast new fulfillment centers and is rapidly enhancing its delivery capabilities to take advantage of its extensive store network to provide convenient in-store pickup and adds that 70 percent of the American population lives within five miles of a Walmart store.

    I'm not sure having to pick up your delivery in person at a Walmart is quite the benefit Walmart thinks it is. The old joke about Target being the store for people who are willing to pay more to avoid being around Walmart customers exists for a reason.

    1. Re:In Store Pickup by sribe · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure having to pick up your delivery in person at a Walmart is quite the benefit Walmart thinks it is.

      Exactly. A couple of times I got an offer for a discount on online purchase at Walmart, and I tried it, mostly out of curiosity. Both times I spent approximately 15 minutes hanging out in the back at the pick-up desk waiting for someone to show up and then retrieve the items, because the stores are so woefully understaffed. I could have been in & out with the same merchandise in *FAR* less time had I not ordered online (which, of course, also took some time).

      OTOH, I tried the same thing at Target, walk in, the pick-up desk is at the front of the store, not the back, and it is always staffed, no ringing a buzzer then waiting 5-10 minutes, and your merchandise is right there, not far away in the very back of some giant storage area on a top shelf. (Hell, at busy times, I've seen *2* people at that desk helping customers, as opposed to the *0* that are always at Walmart, and never a significant wait.)

      And no, I don't really even shop that much ;-) I've just paid attention to these efforts a little out of curiosity as to which retailers will survive Amazon and how they'll do it...

  29. fallen far behind by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    At what point were they even close?

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  30. Kinda like Radio Shack? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    That was going to be their model. Thing is, Amazon has been building up same day service for the last 5 years. They're working on Autonomous vehicles too. Meanwhile Walmart has grocery delivery, even for 'free' at my company, but they charge a premium for all the items you buy and you don't get to pick your produce so the value isn't really there.

    It's looking more and more like online will kill brick and mortar. What I'm wondering is what's going to happen to all those property owners when it does. They guys Walmart & co lease their buildings from are billionaires after all. They make their living renting out the space. All that property is set to become worthless in 20 years. 30 tops. I can't see those guys going quietly into the good night. I'm actually a bit scared. They've got crazy money and power, and their backs will be at the wall. I could see some pretty awful things coming out of that, sort of like how the health insurance biz spends a few billion dollars every time the specter of single payer comes up and we end up with a compromise that is somehow worse...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Kinda like Radio Shack? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. In the cities and other places where people congregate there will always be a place for retail spaces. In rural areas less so but yes they will go gently into that good night. No violence except in your mind. Industries come and go all the time. Real estate is reutilized all the time.

      As a counter point - schools, as currently operated, should go out of business and would if not for an entrenched government - subsidized monopoly. Now that waste of talent, time and real estate will still be around, still operating in the same bloated, ridiculous manner years from now. You want violence. See changing that .

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  31. Useful for in-store pickups by dlenmn · · Score: 1

    The main feature of Walmart (and Target) is that you can get stuff today and sometimes without much schlepping. Wandering around the store takes time, but you can purchase in-stock items online and pick it up from customer service later in the day. If you pass a Walmart or Target on your daily commute, you can just pop in and pick up your order quickly -- not much schlepping required. Granted, that doesn't work if the store is out of your way.

    1. Re:Useful for in-store pickups by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I can order from Amazon Prime Now and have my stuff waiting at my door when i get home. Same day, two hour delivery FOR THE COST OF PRIME ALONE! NO extra delivery charges. Wal-Mart is fucked.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Useful for in-store pickups by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      You will. Wal-Mart has to pop up a full retail store to have a presence in a town. All Amazon has to do is pop up a HIGHLY automated warehouse and hire the local sharing economy workers to deliver (Uber, Lyft workers etc). Im not getting Amazon deliveries in marked Amazon trucks, im getting regular people in normal cars.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Useful for in-store pickups by bmimatt · · Score: 1

      Walmart has more advantages... they've even managed to get into the dating market see this

    4. Re:Useful for in-store pickups by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Not really. In rural and semi-rural areas, this doesn't work at all. And Walmart excels at dealing with rural customers - it's truly one-stop shopping.

  32. $10/hr minimum wage coming to Walmart by dlenmn · · Score: 1

    They're getting out of the "slave/subsistence wages" business model. Walmart is in the process of upping their minimum wage to $10/hr (and taking a large financial hit along the way http://www.bloomberg.com/news/... ). They've already raised it to $9/hr. Moreover, it's not like Amazon warehouse workers get treated well. In fact, some say it's worse that Walmart: http://www.salon.com/2014/02/2...

    (That said, I still get a lot more stuff from Amazon than Walmart.)

    1. Re:$10/hr minimum wage coming to Walmart by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      They're getting out of the "slave/subsistence wages" business model. Walmart is in the process of upping their minimum wage to $10/hr (and taking a large financial hit along the way http://www.bloomberg.com/news/... ). They've already raised it to $9/hr. Moreover, it's not like Amazon warehouse workers get treated well. In fact, some say it's worse that Walmart: http://www.salon.com/2014/02/2...

      Sorry, that's still pretty much "slave/subsistence wages". I had friends getting better wages than that twenty years ago in flyover states with nothing more than a high school degree. Still, the real issue isn't strictly the wages, but rather that they give people like my uncle as many hours a week as they can but not give him benefits. There's a reason that like fast food, you pretty much only see the young and old working at Walmart. They do not offer any sort of career type wage, even for the unambitious in a low cost of living state.

    2. Re:$10/hr minimum wage coming to Walmart by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      And as they're raising hourly rates, they're cutting hours worked, and shifting schedules for some employees around so much it makes it difficult, if not impossible to work a second job.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:$10/hr minimum wage coming to Walmart by dlenmn · · Score: 1

      $10/hr is the minimum, not the average or median. Also, it's not much below median individual income in a lot of "flyover country". E.g. in Mississippi, the median hourly wage is $13.76/hr ( http://www.bls.gov/oes/current... ). A bunch of states have below $15/hr. It's not too surprising that Walmart clocks in below that. In short, "slave/subsistence wages" are very common in "flyover country". The anecdotes about your friends are out of date. That's not a good thing, but it is what it is, and it's not Walmart's fault.

      Speaking as a grad student who makes the equivalent of $10-$11/hr in a place with a higher cost of living than "flyover country", it's not "subsistence" wages. (Although I do get good benefits and don't have children.)

    4. Re:$10/hr minimum wage coming to Walmart by dlenmn · · Score: 1

      So increasing the minimum wage does decrease employment. Who woulda thunk?

  33. Re:Great 5 stars! by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? Amazon charges sales tax on 26 states. It's only time before they charge it in yours.

  34. Re:Great 5 stars! by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been paying sales tax on Amazon for years and years. Further it wasnt Amazon dodging taxes our lawmakers SPECIFICALLY exempted internet commerce so that it could grow.

    --
    Good-bye
  35. Re:Great 5 stars! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? Amazon charges sales tax on 26 states. It's only time before they charge it in yours.

    Interesting, that's news to me...I've not yet lived in a state where Amazon collect sales tax.

    Well, I'll keep enjoying it while I can....

    Sure saved me a bunch of $$$ when I bought some high end camera gear not having to pay the unreasonably high sales tax in this area. You get up to 9.x% of things that are $2500+, it starts to add up.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  36. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by dlenmn · · Score: 1

    If they have a copy in the store, when you buy it online for in-store pickup, someone just wanders down the isle, grabs it, and brings it to customer service. There's not even any shipping. I agree that the system is weird, but I imagine that it works. If you're online, you're shopping around. If you're in a store, you're probably not.

  37. Walmart produce and meats by sjbe · · Score: 1

    You have to be biased against walmart to feel that way. It's just like any other supermarket.

    I have no particular beef against Walmart but I don't like shopping in their stores for groceries. If it comes in a box they can handle it ok but fresh produce or meats? I wouldn't touch most of what they sell with a barge pole. We have a Walmart a few miles south of my house and their selection of fresh produce is pathetic to say the least and usually not very good quality either. Their meat counter is similarly useless. If I want to get Doritos and soft drinks then it's not bad but "just like any other supermarket"? Only of you are comparing it to the bad ones.

    Maybe whole foods makes you feel better

    Nope. I rarely shop there and while they have MUCH better produce and meat than Walmart (not exactly a high bar to clear), I don't really care if stuff is organic and the mark up at Whole Foods is pretty outrageous in a lot of cases.

    - Amazon usually has better prices and the selection is much bigger.

    My experience is that the prices are usually comparable but you are right that the selection at Amazon is WAY bigger. I don't really have much interest in Walmart.com because they don't provide anything I cannot get at Amazon except in rare cases.

    1. Re:Walmart produce and meats by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Walmart has to follow the same health guidelines that every other grocery store has to follow. If Walmart is doing it differently, then it's only a matter of time before everyone else is doing it the same.

      No they don't, they really really don't. This following of guidelines has to be done by associates. They can and do gut their labor supply until they're staffed entirely by the most hopeless dead-end cases, and then pressure those people until they're scrambling to keep up, much like Amazon does in fact.

      You can't DO produce like that. It bruises, damages and spoils and you get in situations where because everything's a wreck the customers feel no obligation to be decent w.r.t the other customers and it all becomes a complete shitshow.

      Health guidelines go out the window. The other part of your statement is sadly (somewhat) true: yes, Walmart puts market pressure on everybody else to be just as much of a shitshow. Either everybody declines to match, or turns to weird things like Aldi where you're sort of picking your way around palettes of cardboard boxes full of counterfeit products that are hopefully shelf-stable for years. Very American, for all that it's a German import.

      It only goes so far before people start bucking the trend by finding favorite stores that haven't declined so much, and playing favorites even in the teeth of Walmart price cuts. I realize it's heresy, but price isn't everything.

    2. Re:Walmart produce and meats by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      I realize it's heresy, but price isn't everything.

      Agreed, we have stopped shopping at Walmart for the same reason.

      Low price isn't enough, they have to run a proper store and treat the employees right at the same time.

    3. Re:Walmart produce and meats by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually walmart's safety standards are a notch above the typical health food store in that they won't carry organic alfalfa sprouts due to the high incidence of e.coli contamination. Meanwhile places like whole foods carry them anyways; in fact whole foods prominently offers a full page of suggestions on what to make with them.

      And indeed, it is walmart who is correct here:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

      And at the same time, whole foods maintains a "ban list" of ingredients not allowed to be sold in their stores, only these ingredients are not proven to be harmful. For example, they ban glutamates. The reason for that is because some people claim to be allergic to them, but no allergy claim has ever been empirically proven. However whole foods happily carries foods that are known to be such strong allergens that even a trace amount can outright kill some people; specifically, peanuts.

      Why? Because whole foods is snake oil, just like their homeopathic medicine aisle.

      That said, I don't get why there's all of this love for a company that actively rips you off (whole foods) and all kinds of animosity towards one that is only guilty of making things too affordable for the poor (walmart.)

    4. Re:Walmart produce and meats by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Aldi is supportive of unions, their cashiers are union and very well paid, and all employees have access to benefits (and they did pre-Obamacare, as well). I don't know about the rest of their staff but my understanding is that everyone working there must be trained as a cashier, which I imagine would make them all cashiers as far as payroll is concerned (that is to say they're not going to get a promotion and a pay cut).

      If I can get cheaper prices and the compromise is that I'm getting off brands and there isn't a million dollars of marketing being thrown in my face every time I enter the store, but the workers are paid well and treated fairly, I think I can live with that, thank you. Sadly, there aren't any Aldi stores where I currently live.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    5. Re:Walmart produce and meats by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      The reason they can make things affordable to poor people is because they're creating poor people.

      Walmart creates poor people how? Let me guess, because they sell things at a low price? Or because they pay their employees minimum wage?

      Guess what? Everybody retailer does that, and has done that since before walmart even existed. Not only that, but wealth isn't defined by income or money. Wealth is defined by the material goods you own. When material goods become cheaper, then more people can have them, thus society as a whole gets wealthier.

      Don't believe me? Well take a look at a few things you take for granted today: In the early days of refrigeration, only wealthy people had them. Now everybody does. In the early days of automobiles, only wealthy people had them, and they were crap compared to what poor people can buy today. Same can be said of big screen TVs, car phones (in fact, what we have no is infinitely better than a car phone), personal computers, microwave ovens, etc.

      These are the things that make up wealth, and every single thing I mentioned today is affordable by the poor, (and indeed, it's common for the poor to own all of the above) which is thanks to companies like walmart whose goal is to make them more affordable.

      Oh but let me guess, you're defining poor by how much their income is, right? Of course you are, because you said poverty, which is a government defined term based entirely on income and ignores wealth. Guess what though? That goalpost has been moving up and up for a long time, and you could live in a mansion and own a nice sports car and have a massive savings but make zero per year, and the government labels you as living in poverty, which qualifies you for medicaid in spite of your assets.

      Also I'll have to say, if you think that just because there's health and safety standards in place that everyone follows them equally go spend one day on any manufacturing floor for any company.

      I don't need to, I've spent a long time in one.

      All these standards and regulations basically entail is "once a year or so we'll come by your workplace and ask the quality people if they're following procedures." ISO 9001 is the biggest joke I've ever seen. It's about as hard as an open book test that you have 2 months to prepare for.

      Uh, no, it's more often than that. I did routine IT work at a meat plant for example and they wouldn't so much as let me walk through the warehouse without a hair and beard net (and of course, carrying any kind of food and water through it was also absolutely forbidden.) Every single day they sprayed all of the walls with highly pressurized soapy water, which was the challenge because we had networking gear and computers on said walls.

      Why did they go through such extremes? Because every few months there would be a surprise USDA inspection.

  38. Re:Great 5 stars! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    I don't think that brick-and-mortar retailers like Walmart will really ever get how to do online commerce.

    They don't even seem to comprehend that they can leverage their brick and mortar stores along with the online presence. Walmart and Walmart.com are two separate entities. One day, we were looking for a toy for our child and found it on Walmart.com for much less money. Somewhat reluctantly, we went into a local Walmart to buy the toy except that it was significantly more IN the store. So we brought it up to customer service to ask them to match the price on Walmart.com

    We were told that they don't price match against their website. We could order it on Walmart.com with the "pick up in store" option, come back an hour later, and walk out of the store with that exact toy, but they couldn't directly sell us the toy for the price on the website. The sales associate understood our frustration, said she doesn't understand it either, and said she's done the "pick up in store" workaround herself, but orders from corporate were that you don't price match against the website in the store.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  39. Service Merchandise or buy FedEx?? by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I can see the future when Amazon buys FedEx or UPS (or an unknown). Sure it is all out-sourced to them - but they have all created huge distribution networks.

    Walmart can become like those Delivery Only Pizza places...or dare I say.. Service Merchandise.

    This is where Walmart can beat Amazon - they already have the local warehouse and future distribution center. Amazon is still building theirs.

    For those who don't recall who/what Service Merchandise was - Catalog shopping. A mashup of online stores of today. You physically browsed the inventory/catalog and placed your order to pickup In-store. You didn't buy anything off the shelf - instead you placed your order at a computer and it would roll out at the front of the store for pickup, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  40. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    We've run into this too. In our case, it was for a toy whose price difference was enough to be annoying to pay, but not so much that we wanted to stick around for an hour so we could buy it for less money. The store associate who explained why Walmart doesn't match Walmart.com admitted it was stupid and that she's done the "select pick up in store, wait an hour, pick it up" trick herself. Corporate had a policy against price matching themselves, though, so she'd get in trouble if she went against it.

    It's like they're still so scared of the online business that they want to keep it at arm's length. Like it's some sort of infectious disease riddled person that they're forced to deal with. You can't get rid of them so you stay as far away from them as possible. If they properly integrated Walmart.com and Walmart's physical stores, they would only increase sales, not decrease them.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  41. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    We do this all the time also. Sometimes, the stores will even price match what's online so we get the online price but the immediacy of the physical store purchase.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  42. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

    Ill never understand why B&M stores always treat their online segment as a whole other business rather than integrate properly

    Probably because physical stores would actually need to reprice items dynamically? So unless they are a store that no longer uses price stickers on anything and have digital price displays that can update every minute, it would be difficult. (Also, I think it would annoy customers -- they wonder back to pick up the item they were looking at earlier, and now it costs $50 more!)

    If you spend time monitoring prices online for a certain product, you'll see these (sometimes abrupt) price shifts. I found this out a few years ago when I was trying to buy a particular type of ladder. I had my eye on it for a couple weeks and was getting ready to buy it at Home Depot (or was it Lowe's? -- can't remember). One morning, I checked online and the price had dropped over 75%. (Yes -- you read that right -- a ladder that normally is about $200 was now selling for like $45.95 or something.)

    Not considering the online problem, I jumped in the car and headed to the store, only to find that their price was of course the usual price of about $200, and of course they wouldn't honor the online price, even though they could see it on the in-store computer. I forgot to bring my phone with me, so I went back home thinking I would just order it then, but by then the price had jumped back up.

    I realized what had happened -- Amazon had some weird blip happen when some 3rd-party seller dropped their price temporarily, probably to sell off one ladder or something. Amazon's system must have automatically detected this price drop and dropped their price to compete. Lowe's or Home Depot then did it too... but once Amazon's price went back up, so did everyone else's.

  43. Amazon's warehouse people used to be Wal-mart's by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Don't forget, Amazon's logistics chain was built by Wal-Mart veterans.

    In fact, Wal-Mart sued Amazon at one point because of that.

    AFAIK, the only logistics person that didn't seem to have a logistics background is Tim Cook...although he was in charge of fulfillment for IBM's PC division at some point. I'm not sure anything in his background would have led anyone to believe that he could create a manufacturing machine like Apple's.

  44. Like Amazon is much better? by swb · · Score: 1

    If you're not searching for a specific brand name of something, you will often get 87 nearly identical products (often with wildly varying ratings, chock full o'astroturfed reviews) for junk made in China.

    Half the time I search on Amazon I feel like I'm just getting an iframe with the results from Alibaba.

  45. Re:Merchandise Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Walmart - The Land of Cheap Plastic Crap, has NEVER been known for quality, only discounted brand name 'stuff', inexpensive nonunion part-time underpaid retail labor... but superior logistics!

    There are case studies done about companies like Rubbermaid that expanded production on the basis of contracts with Walmart, only to find that the once they were beholden to this behemoth for a substantial portion or their revenue, Walmart demanded price reductions. Good business or unscrupulous abuse? That depends on what set of stockholders of constituents the story is presented to.

    Walmart's distribution and logistics increased its rate of inventory turnover, and the efficiency allows for greater price competition. That's the biggest part of their success. It's not rocket science, and it sure hasn't resulted in anything good for the vast majority of its unskilled labor force.

  46. Re:Great 5 stars! by unencode200x · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One things that is interesting is that the buying and marketplaces are different between Amazon and Walmart. Just about anyone can sell on Amazon. Prime sellers obviously have some more hoops to jump through. Walmart has to have their buyers pick products, negotiate prices hard, etc. They have more work to do (I think) to sell you something. That has made some sellers move their products to Amazon. The other thing is that sellers don't have to run a whole eCommerce site anymore. Amazon makes it super easy to sell and for buyers to buy.

    Anecdotally, I have a family of six. We have a "Super" Walmart which is the only major store in my town of 6,000 people the surrounding towns. They have groceries, the normal stuff they carry, an auto repair shop, a doctor, optometrist, two fast food places, and some other things and are open 24/7. We used to shop there all the time. If I wanted to go to Target or Best Buy or whatever I'd have to drive about 20 to 30 minutes or do it during my lunch hour (which is super inconvenient).

    Now we shop almost exclusively at Amazon and we buy our groceries from Peapod. Selection and convenience are the biggest thing for me. I've moved to 90 percent or more of my purchases to Amazon (we have a family of six). Walmart either doesn't have what I need (they tend to carry lower end things here anyway) or I just don't feel like going there. Waiting two days for Amazon is fine.

    BTW, Peapod is freaking awesome too because everything is just there. It saves your last order and you can just reorder, adjust quantifies or whatever, it's usually about the same price as Walmart's grocery store. Produce is great and they even deliver those 40 lb. water softener salt bags that Walmart has all the way in the back of the store even though everyone here needs them.

    --

    Chance favors the prepared mind.
    Perfect is the enemy of good.
  47. Not so much the people by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    The stores are filthy, under stocked and the wait in line is twice as long (though Target is catching up in that last one :( ).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  48. Re:Great 5 stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whole Foods is better than chain grocers for reasons you snobbish people wouldn't understand.

    1) There tends to be faster turnover of fruits and vegetables, which means they tend to be fresher and riper. They don't have to rely as heavily on cultivars which don't ripen well.
    2) Same for meat and seafood. I don't trust butchers that don't see high volume. The lone butcher at Safeway and similar major chains spends most of his days repacking and rearranging the displays. At WH they're slinging meat from open to close.
    3) Selection of fruits and vegetables is consistently more diverse.
    4) Same for meat and seafood. Heck, I can get 75% prepackaged lean ground beef at WH. I can't get that at Safeway. I suppose I could ask them to grind it, but see #2 (turnover). I can get fresh livers, which the wife enjoys. At most major chains the livers they sell taste like they've been frozen for decades.
    5) Many staples at WH--eggs[1], milk, chicken[2]--are _cheaper_ at WH than my working-class neighborhood chain grocers. In fact, lots of things at WH are cheaper than elsewhere. WH makes bank on their prepared meals selection, allowing them to keep prices low on some staples so they can legitimately claim it's not Whole Paycheck. That said, they make it really easy to spend alot at WH if you're not careful.

    In terms of major chains, Whole Foods is _great_. But we don't buy everything there. We split our shopping between Whole Foods, Safeway or Lucky, and Costco. My preference is Whole Foods for vegetables, fruits, meats, and seafood. Safeway for dry goods--bulk grains and legumes at WH are nice but def more expensive for the basics like rice and beans, and anything boxed or from the freezer aisle at WH is usually overpriced, with the notable exception of baby foods. Costco for paper towels, bulk canned stuff, etc. Of course, we mix it up alot based on what we find. For example, I bought several pounds of bell peppers at Safeway a few weeks ago for freezing because they were in season and on sale. Though, not unexpectedly, on my next trip to WH they were even cheaper.

    Some people have other choices. In the Mid-Atlantic there's Wegman's, which is pretty nice. And of course I'm sure many people have a friendly neighborhood butcher. But by-and-large it's hard to beat Whole Foods for staple perishables because their turnover means superior quality, diversity, and very often prices. Whole Foods stores are smaller and more focused. The meat, seafood, dairy, and vegetable departments are basically 1/2 to 2/3 the entire store. And the younger, more spend-thrift customers indulging on prepared foods, cheeses, wines, and niche products _subsidize_ everything else.

    It's the same reason Costco's foods tends to be higher quality than at neighborhood chains--turnover combined with higher-margin products allow them to maintain quality _and_ low-prices on many staples.

    [1] The cheapest large egg producer in the Bay Area, Rock Island, is $2.99 at WH but $3.99 at my local Safeway, Lucky, and everywhere else I've seen. Side note: during the egg crisis for some reason Rock Island wasn't nearly as effected--stores were usually fully stocked with Rock Island when everything else was out. Maybe they really are on an island and avoided the pandemic?
    [2] Regularly on sale for $1.99/lb for whole fryers, which they'll chop. Sometimes you can just ask for the pieces you want. And they weigh the packaged pieces, not the discarded bits. By contrast, at Costco last weekend the cheapest bulk package of chicken thighs was $2.99/lb.

  49. Re:Great 5 stars! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    You can use reshippers from no-sale tax states to avoid paying your sales taxes on Amazon purchases is you like.

  50. Re:Walmart's efficient distribution is a myth by paulej72 · · Score: 1

    Well they did not sell any o f the unstocked items this week so the predictive ordering system did not order any. Or it sent two and both were sold so it sends another two, which will be sold immediately. I blame this system for why they get rid of items from the system. They never order enough to keep the shelves stocked, so the system thinks that they hardly sell any so it is a good item to remove from the inventory.

  51. Re:Great 5 stars! by TWX · · Score: 1

    Sears does the same thing. I've had that happen when trying to buy stuff at the Sears Outlet stores, and what's further aggravating is that they know the quantities on-hand in the stores on the website.

    I don't buy from Sears anymore. I can buy my tools on used market and if anything Craftsman breaks I will get it exchanged, but from now on it'll cost Sears money any time I walk in, rather than make them money.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  52. Re:Walmart's website just gets people pissed off by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    yea but the dumb shit thing is you can order it right there on your phone, do your groceries and when your done some yutz walked over, grabbed it off the shelf and sent you an email, where you just pick it up

    its the exact same box and everything you just had your hands on but NOW you just got it CHEAPER wile still taking up rent utilities and even MORE employees time

    its fucking dumb

  53. Re:Great 5 stars! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

    They keep forgetting ONE BIG reason people order from Amazon.com.
    You don't have to pay Sales Tax on the items.

    That'll apply to fewer and fewer people as Amazon builds out its physical presence. Wherever they have facilities of some sort (server farm, warehouse, etc.), they collect sales tax. I live in Nevada, and pay sales tax on Amazon purchases because they have a warehouse up north.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  54. Re:Great 5 stars! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    You have to be biased against walmart to feel that way. It's just like any other supermarket. Maybe whole foods makes you feel better because they give you the impression that what you're eating there is healthier (spoiler: It's not. I've worked for a major food distributor and we sold them the same stuff we sold walmart when they ordered the same category of items.) The only difference is whole foods refuses to carry certain foods citing health concerns (though there's no actual scientific basis behind their ban list) ...

    Dude, I don't know what you smoked or Kool-Aid you drank at the company you worked at, but Walmart's produce and meats look like they came from Whole Food's dumpsters.

    They are also a parasitic company that moves into an area, lowers their prices to drive other retailers out of business, and then raises their prices once they have established a monopoly.

    Some people place their morals above their bottom line, and that is why they are biased against Walmart.