Slashdot Mirror


Are Car Dealers a Business Worth Keeping? (vox.com)

schwit1 writes: An opinion piece at Vox argues that "car dealers are awful," and the efforts to protect them against direct sales from Tesla and other manufacturers are misguided. "Buying a car involves going from dealer to dealer, each of whom has his own inventory. One guy only has blue paint. The other guy doesn't have the blue paint, and also only has dark gray seats. And each has his own fake sticker prices and complicated cash-back offers. It's no wonder 83 percent consumers say they would rather skip the haggling, and a third of people say doing taxes is less annoying than working with a car dealer.

But it's not just the hassle. State bans on direct sales turn out to cost consumers an enormous amount of cash. It's an enormous problem, and it warrants a federal solution. Cars are the most expensive consumer product that the typical consumer buys. And while it may seem obvious that cars are expensive due to the material and labor required to build them, the logistics of distributing cars is actually a very expensive part of the process. Research by Eric Marti, Garth Saloner, and Michael Spence has concluded that as much as 30 percent of the cost of a car is the cost of distribution.

67 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. Let the Public Decide by Jodka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from the ./ headline:

    Are Car Dealers a Business Worth Keeping?

    Remove the prohibitions on direct sales from manufacturers to the public. If the dealers survive, they are worth keeping. If the dealers fail, they were not.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:Let the Public Decide by evilRhino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's more nuance to things in real life unfortunately. A car manufacturer can certainly get a competitive advantage over retailers since they own a monopoly on supply. It will result in much of the money from car purchases being siphoned away from a local business towards non-taxed multi-national corporations. It might seem like it's a win for the consumer on one front, but the community will lose income and jobs. Don't expect local politicians to support this experiment you devised.

    2. Re:Let the Public Decide by hibiki_r · · Score: 2

      The problem with that plan is that the public doesn't really decide: Car manufacturers do. The whole dealer thing was built because manufacturers were going vertical, as manufacturers could unfairly compete with dealers whenever they wanted to: If you sell Chevy, and Chevy decides that they want to just sell direct, they'll just raise the price of the car to you, and not raise the price to the car to direct consumers, squeezing you out. A year of that, and you are out of business.

      Now, that doesn't meant that vertical integration is not better for consumers: In the long run, it could be better, or it could be worse. It's just that they can't decide either way.

      Similar failures happen in alcohol distribution: Distributors are semi monopolistic in the US, and have deep relationships with big companies, so trying to sell your own product widely can be a big struggle. There's plenty of articles about it.

    3. Re:Let the Public Decide by wulfmans · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "non-taxed multi-national corporations" When will people realize that no corporation ever pays taxes. Not one dime of a corporations real profits are ever taxed. Taxes are included as a business expense and figured into the price of the product. Who pays the "taxes?" the consumer of said product.

    4. Re:Let the Public Decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The biggest chain of dealerships in the country is owned by Berkshire Hathaway. The "family owned dealership" is about as realistic as the "family owned farm". If the family you are talking about is Warren Buffet's family, then yeah, I guess so, but otherwise, no.

    5. Re:Let the Public Decide by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What? Stealership service departments are terrible. Warranty work only.

      They hire the same lame Wyotech grads as Jiffy Lube. Computer says 'X part failed' replace X part, repeat until problem is resolved.

      Fire tech as soon as they start to know anything and ask for more money.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Let the Public Decide by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Insightful

      from the ./ headline:

      Are Car Dealers a Business Worth Keeping?

      Remove the prohibitions on direct sales from manufacturers to the public. If the dealers survive, they are worth keeping. If the dealers fail, they were not.

      My God Man! What you are describing sounds like a free market or something.

      This is AMERICA!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:Let the Public Decide by blue9steel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually it depends on the price elasticity of the product or service they're providing.

    8. Re:Let the Public Decide by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you're overstating the impact. It would still be in the best interest of the manufacturers to maintain the service contracts that they have with dealerships so that they wouldn't have to micromanage repair centers in every city but they could still maintain their QoS. The dealerships themselves would still maintain their hold on the second hand car market for similar logistic reasons, why micromanage a hundred tiny shops for this one thing AND compete with a hundred established entities to provide a service that you're really not that interested in? You also have the leasing market, which could in theory be picked up by the manufacturers, but I suspect that the dealerships will maintain this one as well. Even if you don't have to chase down a delinquent client, which manufacturers may have to start doing anyway, you're still left with a used car at the end of the lease transaction. Then there is the discount that will naturally be provided to the few car dealerships large enough to buy in bulk. So in the end the car dealerships may lose most of the volume from one revenue stream, but the ones that are diverse enough to begin with won't fold because of this shift.

    9. Re:Let the Public Decide by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      There is more than one car manufacturer, and they already engage in heavy competition. What does it matter if dealers are squeezed out of the market? Why is that a bad thing?

    10. Re:Let the Public Decide by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've suggested there's a dilemma where one does not exist, since a dealership going out of business has little to do with jobs or income for the vast, vast majority of people. If the dealership was filling an actual void in the community, such as being the only place you could buy, sell, or repair certain makes and models, those needs don't disappear with the dealership, so other businesses will step in or will expand on their existing business. The jobs don't go away, and while some of the income may be going to a multinational instead of the wealthiest few guys in the state, 99% of us won't be affected by that change.

      Moreover, dealerships already employ most of their people with repairs and other added-value, post-sale items. Those won't go away even if dealerships lose their government-granted monopoly on car sales in certain states. The jobs that are most likely to go away are car salesman, to which my response is, "and nothing of value was lost". I don't buy this whole "woe is me" line that the dealerships are pushing, and neither should you.

      And if a dealership wasn't filling a void in the community by offering those added-value services, then, frankly, they deserve to go out of business for losing their way, refusing to keep up with the times, and failing to remain competitive. Governments shouldn't be propping up useless businesses. The point of having businesses is not to have jobs, but is rather to do something productive and useful. If the sole purpose of a business is to employ people, then it's already a lost cause.

    11. Re:Let the Public Decide by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I don't pay any income taxes, because those are included as an expense when factoring what salary I require in order to work for an employer. And thus my employer pays them. Right?

    12. Re:Let the Public Decide by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      The competition with dealers is artificial anyhow, since all dealers selling cars from the same manufacturer are going to have the same base costs.

      There are enough car companies for a healthy and competitive market, certainly more than four or five major manufacturers. I count at least ten major manufacturers selling vehicles in the US, and more may be enticed to enter the US market if there were less barriers to doing so.

    13. Re:Let the Public Decide by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      ... being siphoned away from a local business towards non-taxed multi-national corporations

      You must prove this will in general make the community worse off compared to keeping the rent-seeking of local dealers.

      That's not usually how it works. The existence of local dealers (and the laws that protect them) is the status quo. Since people tend to be resistant to change the status quo doesn't have to prove anything, instead the proposed changes have the burden of proof.

      Sure that's often dumb, but welcome to millions of years of evolution.

    14. Re:Let the Public Decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Opposite experience here. I've found dealership service to be much more reliable than independent garages. Around here, pretty much all the independent garages are swindlers and assholes. I wouldn't trust them to change my oil. I'd probably get the car back with a coolant hose that's been punctured.

      After I spent about $800 trying to get my last car to run again, I gave up on show shysters. "This is what's wrong, it'll be $300." $300 later: "Whoops, we ran some more tests, and this is what's wrong, it'll be $200." $500 later: "That didn't fix it either, but this time we've got it figured out. It'll be $300." $800 later: "Whoopsie! This time we're really, really, really sure, but it will be $600." Me: "Never mind. I'll just have it towed to the junk yard."

      None of that nonsense from the dealer. I suppose it's different in different towns. Not that I'm saying I car for the sales half of the dealership, but I'd hate for the service department to disappear.

    15. Re:Let the Public Decide by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taxes are regressive. I think that is the point you are making. Eventually the cost of all taxes falls upon "all of us" meaning the least able to pay taxes, pay the most. Always.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    16. Re:Let the Public Decide by gtwrek · · Score: 2

      A car manufacturer can certainly get a competitive advantage over retailers since they own a monopoly on supply.

      And how is this different, than say Apple owning a "monopoly" on the supply of iPhones? Or Caterpillar owning a "monopoly" on the supply of tractors? Or any other manufacturer for that matter? Why must cars be treated with different rules?

      1. It's not a "monopoly" - there's competition.
      2. It's the way a free-market works..

      Not saying you're argument about the effects with respect to local revenue's not valid. But the same argument can be made for any manufacturing. Car's aren't unique in this regard in any way.

    17. Re:Let the Public Decide by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2

      If the best argument for keeping car dealers is that they operate as a local community tax then it's time to get the window breakers out and return us to full employment.

    18. Re:Let the Public Decide by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I think you're overstating the impact. It would still be in the best interest of the manufacturers to maintain the service contracts that they have with dealerships so that they wouldn't have to micromanage repair centers in every city but they could still maintain their QoS.

      All they have to do to maintain QoS is just give away the repair information. They don't do that (dealers have access to documentation and tools not available to the general public) but only to protect the dealers' service revenues. And mechanics at independent shops will come to them and give them money to get certified on their repair practices if they want to get that warranty work, so it's actually a win-win for the automaker.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Let the Public Decide by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Car Manafacturers don't care either way. They own the credit-financing companies that you are going to deal with unless you buy your car outright.

      The only time when borrowing money to buy a car is ever a sane, rational decision is when you get your first real job, and need your first reliable car to get to that job, instead of the junker you've been putting up with. Sadly, we seem to value a borrowed status symbol over sanity.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Let the Public Decide by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      When will people realize that no corporation ever pays taxes. Not one dime of a corporations real profits are ever taxed. Taxes are included as a business expense and figured into the price of the product. Who pays the "taxes?" the consumer of said product.

      Oh, this nonsense again.

      http://economix.blogs.nytimes....

      Probably most people assume that the corporate income tax is largely paid by consumers of its products or services. That is, they assume that although the tax is nominally levied on the corporation as a whole, in fact the burden of the tax is shifted onto customers in the form of higher prices.

      All economists reject that idea. They point out that prices are set by market forces and the suppliers of goods and services aren’t only C-corporations, which pay taxes on the corporate tax schedule, but also sole proprietorships, partnerships and S-corporations that are taxed under the individual income tax. Other suppliers include foreign corporations and nonprofits.

      Therefore, corporations cannot raise prices to compensate for the corporate income tax because they will be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply. It should also be noted that the states have substantially different corporate tax regimes, including some that do not tax corporations at all, and we do not observe that prices for goods and services vary from state to state depending on its taxation of corporations.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:Let the Public Decide by willworkforbeer · · Score: 2

      Doesn't Uber and Lyft currently rely on..... people who own cars?

      FTFY because past performance is not a guarantee of future situational stasis. They (or a competitor TBA) will invest in cheap autonomous cars as soon as it is economically advantageous.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    22. Re:Let the Public Decide by maz2331 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you can get an interest rate under 1%. That is effectively a no-cost loan.

    23. Re:Let the Public Decide by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      But if the interest rate is under 1%, and you can get 3-5% return by saving/investing the money instead of spending it to buy the car upfront, why wouldn't you take the loan?

    24. Re:Let the Public Decide by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Classic mentality of someone who thinks they understand money but really doesn't.

      If I needed a new car, I could walk into a dealership and pay cash for it tomorrow. But why the hell would I do that if I could finance the purchase over several years at a rate less than 1%?

      OPM. Other People's Money. Sure, in this case, I am not using it to buy a potentially appreciating asset...but why would I drop 30K today when I could drop 3k and keep the rest invested? You shouldn't use a car loan to buy a car you can't afford, but there are tons of reasons you should still take advantage of dealers and manufacturers who are desperate to sell you a car and will let you stretch out your payments over a few years for FREE. Heck, even if you don't invest it, I'd still rather keep the cash on hand. If an emergency comes up a year from now, you still have like $20k extra cash. Yeah, you might eventually need it to make the payments, but you don't need to replace it immediately. And hey, there are even banks paying just over 1% on savings accounts right now (not even CDs). You're an idiot to not take the financing at less than 1%...it at least lets you have the money just in case.

      --
      Bottles.
    25. Re:Let the Public Decide by nolife · · Score: 2

      Hypothetical situation
      I could have paid cash for my last new car. Instead I opted for the extra $1K cash back by financing through the manufacturer at roughly 5%, then did a refi the next month to my credit union which gave me $250 cash for a 1.75% loan. Then instead of giving up the 30K in cash to pay that, I paid down my home equity loan which was at 3.8%. The home equity loan is technically my "mortgage" because it was cheaper and easier to go that route instead of refi my house with a traditional mortgage loan a few years earlier.

      There are many reasons to finance a car. It is typically one of the lowest interest rate loans you can ever get.

      In theory, I could have bought a $1K beater car and just put 30K on my home equity loan. I'm with you there. I already have several $1K beaters though. I wanted something newer.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    26. Re:Let the Public Decide by KGIII · · Score: 2

      Dealerships aren't going anywhere soon. You can't test drive over the internet. They're not going to set up a different infrastructure for that. I understand that one of the things that keeps dealerships afloat is their service department - often being partially funded by the OEM. Recalls will need to be done, a new infrastructure for that WITH quality assurance isn't going to be easy or cheap.

      This doesn't mean I think people shouldn't be allowed to buy from the factory. It simply means that they're probably not going anywhere. What would probable be best would be a blended system. Instead of buying the cars (which dealers often do) they'd lease fewer from the OEMs and sell used models with 'factory recertification stickers' or the likes. Inside, after testing the model you like, you'd just use a kiosk and order the model you want with the features you want and it gets delivered to the dealership who then delivers it to you.

      In fact, that's kind of how I ordered my new BMW. I went down to New Hampshire, test drove the model I wanted, decided to buy it, used a kiosk inside, ordered it, and they drove it up to Maine for me. I wasn't interested in anything they had in stock and they knew this as I'd called ahead to let them know that I'd be back down - I'd done business with them before. In fact, I know what it would cost me (including paying the Maine State taxes - no Sales Tax in NH but I am still obligated to pay it) and brought a bank check with me.

      I paid what would have been less than MSRP (it was 'bespoke') but didn't mind paying the extra as the dealer provided a bunch of value added service. They did try to get me to trade in my old BMW. I declined. It's only two years old so I'm going to hand it down to my son. Either way, they provided a service that I don't think I'd get without some form of official representative dealership. I was even invited to go see my car built - I almost did but declined. They were going to let me drive around Germany for a week and not even charge me extra shipping. It was tempting.

      Anyhow, I don't see them going anywhere too soon. At least not in some form. I suspect that I may be right in thinking how the future might be, at least for a while. When you're spending over 100k on a car, you do kind of want to know what driving it is like even if you're pretty certain that it is what you want. Hell, they actually had offered to bring one to me to test drive or to let me have it for a weekend. That's value added service - I'll pay for that and see a desire, if not outright need, for that. Until we can use VR to test drive vehicles, I think we'll probably need some sort of dealership as an official OEM representative. The adage is true, usually. You get what you pay for.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:Let the Public Decide by anmre · · Score: 2

      What are you basing this on?

      The average used car sold in the U.S. is now over $18,000. If you're personally fortunate enough to buy a car with cash, then congratulations. That's just not reality for most people. As you say, people need a car to get to work. Hence, they have to buy on credit. Otherwise, no job and no savings right? Chicken, egg?

      Also, what's a "first real job" these days?

  2. Price tags are the greatest innovation of retail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look at the places where people still haggle over crap like a bag of rice or a pair of pants. Their economies are always underdeveloped with a low standard of living. Moreover, look at the most successful retailers: Walmart, Amazon, Target, that Swedish furniture chain, etc. They all have posted prices. They dominate global retail. If haggling was efficient and productive then some Egyptian or Bangladeshi retail chains would dominate global retail. This is not the case. The price tag was one of the most important innovations of capitalism. So why the fuck do we still by cars like some old lady in a 3rd world market haggling over some melons?

  3. Re:they serve a purpose by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dealers already pay Chevy it's price. The only wiggle room you get is on the dealers profit.

    Chevy competes with Ford much better then Joe's Chevy competes with Fred's Chevy.

    And then you get the 5 state regions where all Honda/Accura dealers are owned by the same corporation.

    Stealerships might have been needed when there were 3 car companies worth considering.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. I love beating the dealers to pieces by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lol, I love beating the dealers to pieces. I game the hell out of them and they can't do a thing about it. Here's what I do.....

    I start with the best advertised car price and call each dealer near me.

    I say, "Here's our best price so far, can you meet it? No, we're not coming in. Just email me your best price and if it's good then we'll come in." I told them exactly what model so the quotes would all be for the exact same vehicle. I also emailed several of them competing quotes from other dealers.

    So I did this several times, getting lower and lower quotes each time. :) They complained bitterly about my doing this, but they beat each other senseless trying to shave another hundred or so off the last set of quotes.

    They would say, "Well if I give you a price then you'll just go to another dealer and they'll give you a lower quote, wah wah wah".

    And I said, "Damn right I will, wouldn't you? I'm just doing my due diligence trying to get a fair price quote. If you don't want to get this sale, don't give me a quote, it's not a problem."

    "Wah wah wah" went the dealers. "This is unfair", "You're just taking advantage of us!", "Wah wah wah", and so on. lol

    But they kept giving us lower and lower quotes. So fug 'em. It's not like I was putting a gun to their heads. :)

    Then I found out something interesting. The dealer physically closest to you is under A LOT of pressure from the car company to sell the car to you, it has to do with their service area and their local sales market. Apparently they get big brownie points for making sales close to their dealership, and they get frowned on if they lose a sale to another dealer farther away. But a dealer farther away will quite happily sell you a car no matter where you live. Hmmmm, let me think about that.... Muwahahahaha. :)

    So once they'd beat each other down pretty close to what they claimed was the "lowest price" they could offer, I spoke to the closest dealer to me (Dealer "A") and told them that Dealer "X' (about 25 miles away) had made me a really good offer, so I was probably going to buy from Dealer "X' , and I was just letting Dealer "A" know to be polite. Cuz I'm a polite guy, you know? That's what makes me so fucking loveable.

    Whoah baby. I was getting a pretty good discount before, but now, as they say, "shit got real". And Dealer "A" dropped the price considerably and threw in a bunch of extra crap and offered to name their first-born child after me. I told them, "Well, I gotta tell Dealer "X" that I'll probably go with you guys then".

    "Oh noes, don't call them!! They'll just offer you a better deal, err, I mean..."

    So to make a long story short, I went through this "closest/farther" cycle a few times, and the prices kept getting lower and lower. And I hadn't even left the house yet, this was all by phone and email . :)

    We did finally end up going with the dealer closest to us, and although I'm sure they made money on the car, they didn't make nearly as much as they would have liked to. We saved over $5000 from the original "best price". I've tried not to cry myself to sleep over this.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:I love beating the dealers to pieces by captaindomon · · Score: 2

      One thing that was really entertaining I did once: I had an offer from one dealer, and actually went in to visit another dealer. While I was there, I got the first dealer on my cell phone, so I was chatting with both salesmen at the same time. It was hilarious. Yes, definitely the best thing to do is to get the dealers fighting with each other, and make sure they know that they are.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    2. Re:I love beating the dealers to pieces by Jaime2 · · Score: 2

      I've always wanted to try a variant of your idea... setting up a web-based interactive auction where the five dealers you invite keep trying to pitch a better deal. Give them a full day to undercut each other, the results should be interesting. Make sure to visit them ahead of time so they can inspect your trade-in and understand that you are a real buyer.

      The scheme I've used in the past is much simpler: first, pick out a car, then go into a dealership with a story that includes you leaving without buying a car. If you are a young woman say you need to run it by your father, if you are a middle-aged man, say you need to talk it over with your wife - whatever, the specifics don't matter.

      Go into the dealership will the full intention to buy the car - just not today. Because your reason isn't that the deal isn't good enough - the sales person won't be able to pressure you into thinking it is. This throws them off and they just keep throwing better deals at you. However, it removes all of the unpleasantness of disagreeing with them - you simply agree that the deal sounds good but tell them you'll be back next week. In my experience, they will hit their rock bottom price before letting you leave.

    3. Re:I love beating the dealers to pieces by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like to beatup dealers too.

      But I don't buy new cars. Ever.

      If you want a basic transportation special from a dealer, you just have to wait until the empty car hauler shows up. Than go look in their back lot. They will have a dozen or so used cars ready to go to the auction, with a minimum bid in the window. Know that the auction house charges a % and the hauler charges a flat fee. So find the transportation special that's acceptable, read the minimum bid. Go inside, don't talk to any salespeople, (don't acknowledge them or they get commish) offer the sales manager $50 (or $5) more than the minimum bid and don't budge. When he tries to get more, point out how much it will cost him once car is loaded. Say 'tick tock'. They will call you names, say you are starving their kids, Fuck em.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:I love beating the dealers to pieces by eth1 · · Score: 2

      Problem is, that really only works with cars that not enough people are buying, and will be sitting around on the lot. Anything where they know a sucker will come in within the week and buy it, they'll just ignore you.

      I buy cars very infrequently, which means I can usually pay cash. This gives a few interesting options. My favorite was doing enough homework to figure out what a good "all-in" price was (includes all the fees, etc.) for a specific car in inventory. Then wait till the end of their month (or quarter, if you can figure that out).

      Get your test drive out of the way somewhere else. Get a cashier's check for the "all-in" price made out to Dealer's Name OR Your Name (so you can easily re-deposit it). Go in, find a sales individual, give them the inventory # and show them the check, and let them know a) you have no checkbook/credit card/cash with you, and b) if they say anything other than "yes, we have a deal," you're leaving.

      As long as they aren't losing money on the deal, and that model hasn't been selling for high prices because it's popular, they have little reason to refuse.

    5. Re:I love beating the dealers to pieces by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My wife and I have used a gimmick where we go into the dealership together and I do all the talking with the salesdroid and she only acts minimally interested in the process, like the car is for me and she's just along for the experience.

      Once we've sorted out what we want to buy and have some kind of researched invoice price, we switch roles. I quit saying anything at all and she starts negotiating with the salesdroid.

      It really fucks with their head and they don't negotiate well. My wife is kind of an ass-kicker in negotiations to begin with and this gives her a huge psychological advantage. One guy kept trying to talk to me and she got pissed at him and yelled at him for not talking with the person she was actually negotiating with.

    6. Re:I love beating the dealers to pieces by Jason+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

      My folks would do that, but they'd take it one step further.

      They'd play good cop/bad cop, my dad would really really want the car, my mom would not like it. So they'd argue in front of the salesperson, and my mom would just keep digging in her heels until the price came down a *LOT*.

      Then they'd switch roles. Without warning or obvious signal, they'd reverse on the salesperson. Suddenly she's on board, but my dad wouldn't be sure anymore, and not happy about this, or that, or something else, and you know, she made him think about it a bit, and...

      The poor salesdroids had no idea what to do, so they just kept going lower. They walked out one time with the sales manager almost in tears trying to satisfy them. When they 'reluctantly' agreed to the deal, he was falling all over himself in gratitude... even though he'd just gotten soaked, badly. Like five figures below sticker, four figures below cost badly.

      My dad had been a very successful car salesman way back in the day, and knew every stupid little trick his colleagues would play on the unsuspecting. He quit because he couldn't handle the deceit and dishonesty any more. Flipping it around was highly satisfying to him.

      Mom was just kind of evil.

  5. car dealerships are typically not local businesses by Ionized · · Score: 4, Interesting

    most cars sold are sold by dealerships owned by large chains that span counties or states. you might call them regional businesses, but very few of them are small enough to be considered local.

  6. Re:Warranty service by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wouldn't be too concerned about it. Warranty Service is the biggest profit center at most dealerships. Third party repair centers would happily take over that role if given the chance.

  7. Re:Warranty service by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Informative

    As soon as the warranty ended, I never went back. My local shop is much better then the dealer. If yours is not, find another one.

  8. Re:Price tags are the greatest innovation of retai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bullshit. Haggling for car purchases benefits three people:

    1. People who are aggressive negotiators. Not everyone has the stomach *or time* to negotiate on a car.
    2. People with money. Rich people have choice including the ability to wave a fat stack of cash at the dealership. Poor people have to take what they can get.
    3. The dealers who can anchor prices at ridiculous heights. Because of the lack of free information and restrictions on how long people who need cars can go without them before it starts costing big car purchasing is not a free market and thus the invisible hand does not help.

  9. Re:they serve a purpose by rgmoore · · Score: 2

    The dealers already pay Chevy it's price.

    That's not entirely true, because the dealer's pricing isn't that simple, either. They're typically buying the cars from the dealer on credit and get a discount if they pay back faster than the terms of the credit agreement. Manufacturers will also offer incentives to the dealer, like a substantial bonus if they meet a challenging sales target. The net result is that the dealers may sometimes make deals on individual cars that don't appear to make sense given the "dealer price" but that do make sense when you look at all the discounts and incentives they're getting.

    --

    There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

  10. That's fun, then I don't pay taxes either. by Brannon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just markup how much I need an employer to pay me by the amount of the taxes such that it's equivalent to me paying no taxes.

    And the employer marks up the costs of the products we sell so that it's equivalent to him not paying me at all.

    And the customers of those products simply insist that their employers pay them more to cover the cost of the products, so it's like they're getting those products for free.

    Wow, this is awesome. Somehow nobody ever pays for anything in this system. Money doesn't exist! It's all magic! Yippee!

    ---

    OR...maybe all money flows in a loop and we tax it when it changes hands. Oh, that makes a lot more sense. The world makes sense again. I guess I was just temporarily a huge idiot who didn't know how economics works.

  11. Re:they serve a purpose by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why you ALWAYS buy a car at the end of the month... because some stealership somewhere is DYING to make their sales goal, and will practially GIVE you the car in order to make that goal. There's an excellent This American Life podcast about it.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  12. Re:Warranty service by Jaime2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There would still be factory-authorized service stations. They ride on the dealership concept today, but are essentially a separate business responsible for their own profit. No reason to think that half of the business would fail, since they have a captive market.

  13. It works differently in (most of) EU by Kartu · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are not limited by dealer's inventory.
    You normally order a fully customized car, which is built specially for you.
    It normally takes 2-6 weeks to manufacture and deliver it.

    1. Re:It works differently in (most of) EU by cpoch · · Score: 2

      You can custom order a car in the US. I've done it, and based on my experience, will do it again next time I want a new car. I got exactly the options I wanted without getting stuck paying for stuff I don't want or would never use. In my case, I ordered before the production began, so I waited 3 months for my car, but for most models already in production, the turnaround is usually 4-6 weeks.

      Granted, you can get some good deals on cars that are just sitting and therefore have been marked down (you have more negotiating power there), but in my case, getting exactly what I wanted was more important - and I bought through Costco (still uses a dealership but the pricing is prenegotiated). Since I was buying a brand new model, the Costco pricing killed whatever I could have negotiated on my own, but YMMV on models that have been out for a while.

  14. The other two thirds... by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a third of people say doing taxes is less annoying than working with a car dealer.

    The other two thirds are people who have never bought a car from a dealer.

    Car dealers are useless middlemen that provide little to no value to car buyers. The only reason they still exist in the new car market is because they are protected by law. The sooner they go away the better. If they could provide actual value I wouldn't object to their existence but 99%+ of them are nothing more than a needless markup to the price of the car and add a lot of irritation to the process. Not to mention that many have a well earned reputation for being crooks.

  15. $120B worth of jobs by laughingskeptic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Squeezing $120 billion of efficiency out of a $400 billion industry by largely eliminating the jobs of people who we find irritating might not be the best course of action and could put 1 million irritating people in jobs that bother us even more.

  16. Waste of my time by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lol, I love beating the dealers to pieces. I game the hell out of them and they can't do a thing about it.

    Some people do enjoy the negotiation. Most Americans very much do not and I am one of them. And frankly for most people, car dealers are better negotiators. They do it all day every day and they are well practiced. Plus it frankly is a huge time sink and an annoying one at that. I've negotiated plenty of car buys but the experience is never painless or fun.

    And honestly no matter what price you get from a dealer, there is a markup involved. They aren't selling it to you at a loss. I would rather deal directly with the manufacturer and I'd even be ok with splitting the dealer markup between us. Both the manufacturer and I would be better off. Dealers cannot go away soon enough in my opinion.

  17. Why not just buy a used car? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a dealer in Minneapolis that sells nothing but used cars, and most of them are like 1-2 years old with very low miles. My wife bought an Acura MDX that was 1 year old with like 14,000 miles on it and it looked brand new inside and out. We drove the same model and trim new and couldn't see any differences (there was no model year changes).

    And the savings were great, much more than any discount we could have gotten off a new car.

    The car still has an extensive manufacturer warranty, serviceable by any dealer.

    I bought my Volvo S80 V8 used from a dealer, a one owner lease return. I paid HALF the sticker price (sticker found inside the car) with 20K miles on it and it was totally mint.

    The other nice thing is avoiding troublesome new cars.

  18. Re:car dealerships are typically not local busines by interval1066 · · Score: 2

    Indeed. Bought a jeep wrangler from a "group", they have dealerships all over the San Francisco Bay Area. Most independent dealers (with one lot) look to get bought out by these consortiums. Leaving dealer's like "Fast Bubba's quality cars" trying to sell you a pacer with mis-match panels and primer all over the body. Well, who can blame them? A big pay out for your business is a very attractive offer.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  19. Re:they serve a purpose by Solandri · · Score: 2

    The dealers already pay Chevy it's price. The only wiggle room you get is on the dealers profit.

    So you, an individual who buys a car once every few years, think you can negotiate a as good a deal from the manufacturer than a bunch of dealers who buy hundreds if not thousands of cars from the manufacturer each month?

    If you think your negotiating skill is that great, then you should have no problem negotiating a good price from dealers. If your negotiating skills suck, then you're far more likely to be taken to the cleaners by the manufacturer than by multiple middlemen in competition with each other.

    I know Tesla is everyone's darling, but they're in a unique position because of their low sales volume. In pretty much all other industries, manufacturers don't want to deal with direct sales because it introduces variables like market projections, overhead like leasing warehouse space, and the logistics of dealing with product returns. They'd rather just concentrate on making the product, and ink a deal for 10,000 units with a middleman (supermarket, department store, electronics retailer, etc) and be done with it. The middleman handles all the marketing projections (to figure out how many items their geographical area needs), advertising, inventory, and returns.

  20. Re:they serve a purpose by tburkhol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if chevy sells a car to a dealer for $16000 and the dealer after haggling and whatnot sell the car to me for $17600 then the dealer made their 10% profit. Cut out the dealer and buy from the manufacturer and they will just sell me the car direct for $17600. It is foolish to think anything else would happen.

    The dealership sold you a car for $17,600, but they sold the same car (in red) to your neighbor for $16,900 and to my brother-in-law for $18,200. The dealership can spend three hours haggling to figure out just exactly how much each customer is willing to pay. In fact, they have to, because haggling is their entire profit margin.

    Direct manufacturer sales will make plenty of profit without haggling. They're likely to be more interested that each customer feels fairly treated during the purchase, and a couple hundred dollars one way or the other just doesn't matter. If a customer thinks Joe's Chevy cheated them, they'll go to John's Chevy for the next purchase. If they think Chevy cheated, they'll be going to Ford.

    Point is: if you take out a middleman tax, the seller gets more money, the buyer pays less money, and everyone's happy except the middleman. Sales taxes are still paid locally, property taxes are still paid locally, staff are still hired locally, so most of the 'local' money is going to stay local.

  21. Re:Price tags are the greatest innovation of retai by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I DESPISE haggling. I won't do it under any circumstances. I find it to be a major waste of time and energy.

    When I give someone a price that is the price and it is not open to negotiation. If I see a price and I think it is fair I will pay it, if not I will go somewhere else and that is the end of it.

    If there is somewhere that only does haggling I would just not go there ever. If there is an item that can only be bought with haggling I will just not buy it or pay someone else to do it.

    --
    Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
  22. Here is how dealers make money. by DirkDaring · · Score: 3, Interesting

    #3-7 are pretty much lumped together, but here you go:

    #1. The service center
    #2. Car leases (dealers LOVE leases, very profitable for them. May even beat out the service center soon.)
    #3. Added junk (underspray, fabric protection, accessories, etc)
    #4. An extended warranty that you can never use
    #5. Financing (How much per month were you looking at...)
    #6. Handling/Processing
    #7. Kickback from manufacturer

    Then about last on the list:

    #8. Price of the car / markup

  23. The US wants Instant Gratification by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having lived in the US previously, I much prefer the Norwegian (and most of the EU) model where you go online or to a dealer and figure out exactly which car you want:

    Engine, paint, transmission, seats etc, then you haggle a bit about the price and order it, with delivery a number of weeks later.

    In the US it seemed dealers really needed to be able to deliver a car TODAY, not tomorrow or next week.

    Personally I ordered a Tesla 4WD model a few days ago, for delivery in the beginning of March.

    The main difference from my last car was in the fixed sticker price: No haggling about rebates, just a simple take it or leave it offer.

    The main reason for getting a Tesla here in Norway is of course our incredibly high import duties and taxes on regular cars (a car with a V8 engine would probably cost 2.5 to 3 times as much as in the US), while a Tesla has no import duties, no sales tax, no road fees and lots of free parking & charging. In a couple of years they have stated that the relative subsidies for zero emission vehicles will get a cap, so only smaller cars will be able to take full advantage.

    Terje

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
    1. Re:The US wants Instant Gratification by istartedi · · Score: 2

      This is how cars were sold in the USA at one time. I remember as a boy in the 70s, sitting there with my Dad. The dealer went over a long list of options which even included things such as rear axle ratio and other technical specs. A few weeks later, a piece of Detroit iron was ready for us.

      I think they eliminated that process as part of the general dumbing-down of America.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  24. Re:Price tags are the greatest innovation of retai by thedonger · · Score: 2

    4. People who aren't dependent-buyers.

    The ability to walk away is important. If you are shopping for a car because your car died and you don't have super credit or savings, haggling works about as well as bluffing in poker. You may not have the stomach for that, but it isn't the fault of the haggling system.

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
  25. Trade and F&I by Syncerus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of the comments have been made by people who have never worked within the automobile industry and who hate the current process of buying a car. That's fine, but they're missing some important parts of the picture. The first unmentioned part is that the majority of deals involve a trade. As much as you think people hate buying cars, you will quickly discover that they hate selling their cars even more. Most people are entirely too lazy to prep their cars for sale, and are usually unwilling to invest in the repairs that will facilitate the sale of their vehicles. The second issue is that a huge percentage of the buying public has marginal to poor credit. The auto dealership essentially preps and polishes the credit application, and then finds a lender willing to buy marginal paper.

    These two criteria eliminate about 85% of the buying public from purchasing directly from the factory. Really.

    --
    "Man is nothing without the works of man" -- Helvetius
  26. Re:car dealerships are typically not local busines by TWX · · Score: 2

    most cars sold are sold by dealerships owned by large chains that span counties or states. you might call them regional businesses, but very few of them are small enough to be considered local.

    If anything, the manufacturers are putting ever-increasing requirements on the franchised-dealers, such that many smaller dealers lose their franchises. Several years ago Chrysler ended agreements with probably a third of their dealers, many of them their oldest franchises, because those dealerships would not modernize their facilities and did not contribute much in the way of promotions. Ironically most of those dealerships were on land that was paid-off, so they didn't really have to sell many cars to keep afloat so long as the service department was successful. Not selling cars isn't good for the manufacturer though.

    The only real services that dealerships offer that I value are new-car prep and warranty/recall service. I do not value their out-of-warranty or other paid-service, and I do not value the purchase process. Both are much more trouble than they're worth.

    As far as corporate vs franchise, there are plenty of industries where there are both corporate end-retail locations and there are franchise end-retail locations. Restaurants immediately come to mind.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  27. Re:they serve a purpose by vovin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Deals make their money from used cars. Always have, always will.
    New car sales profit: $1000 over invoice at a 'no-haggle' (which is about the average paid when haggling).
    If you are *really* good you can work it down to oh say $600 or $700 if they dealership is really hurting for sales.

    You are *always* getting screwed on your trade-in, *always*.
    Advice: never bring a car to trade it. But then it's a colossal PITA to do a private party car sale ... so YMMV.

    Manufacturer makes the money on a lease .. they are doing the financing through their wholly owned subsidiary.

    If you by-pass the new car dealerships you still have the used car dealerships so I don't see it as much of a win.

  28. Re:they serve a purpose by avandesande · · Score: 2

    Manufacturers hide the real invoice price with incentives etc....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  29. Re:Price tags are the greatest innovation of retai by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 2

    Negotiation is a waste of time and energy.

    I have no interesting in playing games with price. You charge a fair price and I will buy. You charge an unfair price and I won't. I won't even talk to you about the price. If I think it is unfair compared to a simple internet search I will just go elsewhere.

    I care about solving problems related to making drugs for curing things like cancer available. I care about figuring out new ones to optimize a problem. Talking to a human to figure out a price on something just does not make the list of anything I am interested in. If I have to talk to you to figure out a price you already cost too much.

    --
    Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
  30. Re:Price tags are the greatest innovation of retai by b0bby · · Score: 2

    I wind up paying 20% to 50% more for a vehicle than my counterparts in the UK or Germany, and wind up with a shittier vehicle to boot.

    I have relatives in the UK, and lived there for years. My rule of thumb is that most things there cost in pounds what they do in dollars in the US. Cars aren't quite that bad, but a quick search shows a Toyota Yaris starts at ~$16k in the UK, ~$14k in the US. So I'm not seeing your 20% markup in the US.

  31. Re:they serve a purpose by KGIII · · Score: 2

    I am a bit of an aficionado so I buy a lot of cars and own a stupidly large number of vehicles. I never, ever, trade in my car. Well, okay, I've done it twice - sort of. One was an exchange where the dealer paid me money and a new car. It's a long story. I'll share it if you really want...

    Anyhow, it's not hard to do a private sale. Just do it on your terms. I've moved more cars than I can think of right now. The internet really helps with this as does a cell phone. Just take it to the mechanic first (really, usually, worth it) and also get it detailed. Some cars are not worth that effort but usually they are if you're actually hoping to sell it for any real money.

    You can use Craigslist, I can even do that in Maine. If you need to then set up a block of scheduled time for interested parties to view/test the car on a weekend. It does help to avoid tire kickers but that's something you learn with time. So, there's that. Another, if you really have something worth selling, is to go to a site that has a forum specifically geared towards your car. There are a lot of people who are into a whole variety of vehicles and are very dedicated to a specific model - even specific years, such as myself. (An example, as silly as this may sound to you - I own a fully restored 1982 Volvo 245 with the Canadian trim - meaning square headlights. I love that car. I paid a metric ton for that car and the restoration.)

    There are sites that will let you list your car for a fee - I've actually heard good things about buying a car from eBay but I've never known anyone who sold a car with it. A buddy sold his Harley and was happy with the service, there's that - I guess. If you've taken good care of it then there's probably a market and communication is nearly free and very easy today. You can find a buyer - make the buyer do the work but try to be reasonable about it.

    I dunno... I just figured that I'd throw this out there. It's not really that much work and it's worth it. If you've really got something nice then visit a car show. They're not all antiques or the likes. I don't own any vehicles that don't get driven, at least some of the time, and even I bring a new car to the weekly show that I attend at least some of the time. I've a standing offer for the above mentioned Volvo, $18,000. Sadly, I have more than that in it. Either way, it's not for sale. It's what I often take out on snowy nights - it's like a tank but rear wheel drive. Sure, 0 to 60 in three point two days but that doesn't matter in the snow. I'm pretty passionate about it and unless you're trying to unload a shitty econobox then someone may be very specifically interested in your used car.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  32. Re:car dealerships are typically not local busines by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2

    If most of the cost of a car is in the distribution, then at least inside the USA, let me trade that cost for the cost of air fare to the automobile assembly plant. I would be willing to buy it there, and "distribute" it myself, driving it home.