Slashdot Mirror


Google Fiber Goes Down During World Series, Credits KC 2 Days of Service (pcmech.com)

kstatefan40 writes: Google Fiber went down in Kansas City during one of the most important times in the local market: Game 1 of the World Series between the New York Mets and the Kansas City Royals at Kauffman Stadium. Yesterday, I got an apology from them via email, and even though I wasn't home during the outage, they're making up for it by proactively giving the entire market 2 days of service off of their next bill. The rest of the industry could really learn from their customer service.

When was the last time a telecom provider gave you a discount on your bill without you asking for it?
The only times I've gotten much apology from my own ISP is when I threaten (with reason) to jump ship.

19 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When was the last time a telecom provider gave you a discount on your bill without you asking for it?

    when was the last time a whole city lost service? what does this say about the redundancy of their infrastructure? people rely on utilities to provide a crucial function in their lives. electricity? natural gas? phones? if google wants to get serious about their fiber, they need to take on the responsibilities that come with being a public service provider.

    1. Re:redundancy by bfpierce · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We lose broadband in my town (Time Warner) for 4-6 hour periods, roughly once in a calendar year depending on the weather. And no, they've never credited me a dime for it, nor will they since they already have the market cornered.

    2. Re:redundancy by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Comcast does this all the time, Hell this summer the entire state went down for 1 hour.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:redundancy by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems you cant read.

      "Most lost service from shortly before 7 p.m. Tuesday until about 7:35 p.m. "

      So what planet are you from where there is 48 hours between 7:00pm and 7:35pm?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:redundancy by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      Also a difference between a 'normal' outage and an outage during the World Series when the local team is playing in it.

    5. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You keep saying 48 hours, but that's the credit, not the downtime. Downtime was between half an hour & three hours, depending on customer location.

      a difference to losing it due to inclement weather (also happens to electricity over power lines) than just cuz

      No, there isn't to the customer.

      also difference in TW dealing with aging infrastructure than goog having brand new technology and installed network

      No, tha'ts TWs fault for not investing in upgrades, taking short term profits over long term sustainability.

      I think we can expect goog to have much better uptime than TW.

      Why accept that?

    6. Re:redundancy by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      when was the last time a whole city lost service?

      All you need to cause a whole city to lose service, is a "Loose Nut" behind the steering wheel of a backhoe. You can put up a big sign saying "Do Not Drill or Dig Here!" . . . which the "Loose Nut" will interpret as an invitation to do some investigative fracking.

      what does this say about the redundancy of their infrastructure?

      "Loose Nuts" tend to be like Quantum entangled pairs of Schrodinger's cats: They are both digging where they shouldn't be digging at the same time, but in difference places. In highly redundant systems, "Loose Nuts" are like an Abstract Hilbert Space full of Schrodinger's cats.

      This is why Einstein quipped about Quantum Mechanics, "Niels Bohr and his pals must be smoking some weird shit, because I can't make heads or tails of it." And then Bohr answered, "Chill out Al, . . . it's not heads or tails . . . it's both . . . at the same time! Hey, is von Neumann Bogarting the bong again!?"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:redundancy by JazzLad · · Score: 2

      If you had high standards for yourself, you'd stop posting.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    8. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      says something about the google-fest on this site that I am getting pilloried for calling out a wealthy company on their poor infrastructure planning and lack of redundancy.

      That's not what's happening to you, and you know it.

      You spouted off a hasty, ill-informed judgment and continued to argue with others who were obviously more informed than you. This has caused embarrassment to you, and that embarrassment is both one hundred percent your fault and one hundred percent deserved.

      Your attempt to shift the blame for your mistake, and to frame the mockery you earned as some kind of martyrdom, are only compounding that embarrassment.

      And because you lack self-awareness and the will to learn, you're going to keep repeating these mistakes even after they have been carefully laid out and explained to you.

    9. Re:redundancy by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      I've seen people do that, put in two servers, then replicate between them. So now, a hardware failure between either would cause both to fail, and a failure of the replication would cause both to fail. So the uptime was reduced greatly, but they had redundancy. That kind of stupidity is what happens when someone demands redundancy without understanding.

  2. Are you kidding? Best free advertisement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They take it as a writeoff, and now:

    People know there's such a thing as Google Fiber.
    Big companies use it for real things.
    Google is cool about customer service.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they torched it on purpose just to make the point.

  3. Same thing in Austin by nukem · · Score: 5, Informative

    Had an outage a couple of weeks after install. I wasn't home so didn't even notice. Got an email crediting me for the day and showed up on next bill. It sucks that there are outages but it's nice that they give credit for them.

  4. If Comcast did this... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You would get an email explaining that the service interruption was a feature and your bill will go up by $22.50 from now on.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:If Comcast did this... by internerdj · · Score: 2

      Of all the nightmare troubles I had with Comcast customer service, this wasn't true the last time I had Comcast. I lost service for a week. It was completely their fault and I called them up and asked for a credit for the service interruption and they said "OK. I've credited it to your bill." No escalation, no hours on hold. Of course, another time they decided to move my billing due date by a week, charge me for a whole month of service, and refused to issue any credit.

  5. Corporate Arrogance is plentiful. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The only times I've gotten much apology from my own ISP is when I threaten (with reason) to jump ship."

    Well, don't expect even that half-assed effort in the future.

    We watch our government ignore anti-monopoly laws. We watch companies try and buy each other for hundreds of billions, knowing full well the DOJ should certainly shoot down the deal. And then we watch those same companies try and try again until they find that loophole (or greased palm) that allows the deal to go through. And it does eventually go through. Every damn time.

    We've watched our cellular market collapse into massive monopolies, with fixed pricing so obvious you couldn't help but blame collusion.

    As monopolies continue to grow, don't expect to be treated with kindness, since you will truly be nothing more than a number to them when there's 500 million customers to manage. Google is demonstrating a massive exception here, and one I wish would take precedent for customer service to be reborn instead of the steaming pile of shit we have today.

    I'm not holding my breath.

  6. Just two days of service? by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they're making up for it by proactively giving the entire market 2 days of service off of their next bill.

    Two day's worth of service is an insignificant credit compared to the loss, especially during a special event.

    Most providers of business IP transit have SLA credits available, starting from the time when the customer calls in to request the ticket be opened, by the way, in some cases these are refundable, and can require the provider paying cash, not just crediting future service in case of a full on outage.

    A couple hours worth of outage would typically generate enough SLA credit to make an entire month and possibly two month's worth of service gratis.

    So how come it's so unusual for a residential ISP to waive even 2 days, after a few hours unscheduled downtime?

  7. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And thus bad CSR's are the prime cause of customer loss, and not the other way around. That's excluding when they make promises to retain you that they know are rubbish, or it ends up costing the customer more and then they just cancel out of distrust of anything further.

    Personally, I get through to supervisors. It's not hard. I'm not even very polite, I've just had a lot of experience (you'll see why below). But mainly because I know what I'm entitled to and what I'm not. If you give me problems, that's what recording the phone call is for. Ooops. A CSR out of a job for talking bullshit is much easier than losing a long-term customer precisely because the next CSR is paid the same and just another guy reading the same script.

    It's not a question that large callcentres are always staffed by assholes, who all claim the supervisor "isn't available" (or not even there, that always gets a laugh from me too!) because that's exactly what they are told to do.

    But that's not the end of the customer's power. In the UK, you can record the phone call. It's only "advised" to tell them you are recording and if THEY have a "calls may be recorded" warning - well... I don't need to tell them if I'm recording at all (I don't need to anyway, it's just polite).

    And then the ball-game gets turned around. You're refusing to give me your name? You're refusing to accept notification of my cancellation? You failed to follow procedures? You put me on hold but never resolved the query that you went on hold to do? Oh, that little tape winging its way to head office is going to hurt and given that it's your JOB to help (no matter what your mythical never-present supervisor might train you to do), it's going to cost you.

    Last time I phoned up with a complaint, I *did* get the mythical supervisor on the line (I always do, when I deem them necessary, but that's another matter) and I had the British Gas callcentre (if you live in Britain, you know they are one of the WORST for callcentres) that he was in charge of phoning local newsagents near me to discover one that they had a PayPoint in, that they could *pay* to stay open late, especially so that *I* alone (as in I had to present ID to the newsagent, who'd already shut up shop but had been paid to stay open only for me) could go over to them and top-up a pre-payment card to solve my problem. The problem was quite minor, their way of dealing with it wasn't, but I got my way and cost them a lot more money than basic compliance would ever have cost - by getting through to that supervisor and explaining what was happening.

    I don't expect the minions on the front-line of the callcentre to understand that, they never do. But getting a supervisor isn't a fob-off that works when people are serious, and the supervisors know exactly when they have to act to not get caught.

    And turning the tables of "No, that's fine, I'm recording that response, and your name was?" on them soon wakes them up because they know those kinds of games are stupid, immoral, not helpful, losing them customers, and sometimes illegal when they have a duty to act on the information given to them (i.e. cancellations).

    I don't threaten callcentres and companies with court. They threaten me quite often. I've invited to initiate the court proceedings on behalf of at least two companies to save them time. Strangely it's NEVER got that far when they find out I have recordings and every letter and email ever sent or received. But I have screwed over any number of callcentre operatives who failed to do their job by playing such games and thinking it's cute to try to run rings around my efforts to do something quite reasonable. To my knowledge, I've cost at least two their jobs. One of them phoned me back up to threaten me because of that.

    Being a dick on the phone to customers is all fun and games until it costs you your job. Because you ARE supposed to be there to help and you're really not important enough to lose even a medium sized customer over.

    That's th

  8. $5? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    They gave everyone less than $5 and *that* is the customer service model to aspire to? "Sorry we suck, here's $5, go away"

  9. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by PRMan · · Score: 2

    My wife is also a mystery shopper that has cost many people their jobs at high-end restaurants, amusement parks, electronics stores, coffee shops, etc. The most common reason for being fired? Lying to the customer about stock availability (because they are too lazy and think that nobody will check) or about other policies or procedures they don't want to follow (returns, allergy situations at the restaurants, etc.).

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...