How GoDaddy's Quest For Respect Led To an Improbable Partnership With MIT (fastcompany.com)
harrymcc writes: GoDaddy, the world's biggest domain registrar, remains most famous for its tacky Super Bowl ads and controversial founder, Bob Parsons. But in recent years, the company was sold, hired a CEO from Microsoft and Yahoo, and has made a major effort to reinvent itself as a serious, uncontroversial, technologically-savvy outfit. And now it's partnered with MIT's Media Lab in an ambitious experiment--which I wrote about over at Fast Company--involving placing sensors around downtown Boston to collect big data that could help the small businesses which line the city's streets.
Sensors that track customers? Sounds like a very strange definition of uncontroversial, but that's just me...
"Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
Don't forget they supported SOPA.
From a company/CEO that endorses SOPA (despite its retraction after the boycott), Gitmo/water boarding (despite the later change after the public outcry), and goes out of its way to help law enforcement cease assets against its own customers without even a court order.
Putting sensors everywhere in the street to surveil passers-by seems like a perfect continuation of the same fascist big brother government-knows-better mindset. I'm not sure changing the CEO is going to change anything about the company itself, except may be get a CEO that is better at keeping his mouth shut (than the last one).
and ignoring complaints about it.
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/li...
Thats ok though, IPTABLES fixed that problem.
Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
I really can't imagine who thought this was a good idea, but it doesn't seem to have done their sales any harm.
It''s obviously true that any advertising or marketing is ok as long as it creates some impression, whether good or bad. In the UK, the "go compare" insurance ads are simultaneously the most hated and most recognisable ones on TV.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it