Slashdot Mirror


3D Printed Objects Found Toxic To Fish Embryos (universityofcalifornia.edu)

itwbennett writes: Researchers at the University of California, Riverside have found that the parts of two common types of 3D printers are toxic to zebrafish embryos. The researchers made this discovery accidentally when a graduate student whose work involves developing tools for studying zebrafish embryos "noticed that zebrafish embryos die after exposure to parts from the 3-D printer." According to the report, "While the embryos exposed to parts from the plastic-melting printer had slightly decreased average survival rates compared to control embryos, the embryos exposed to parts from the liquid-resin printer had significantly decreased survival rates, with more than half of the embryos dead by day three and all dead by day seven. And of the few zebrafish embryos that hatched after exposure to parts from the liquid-resin printer, 100 percent of the hatchlings had developmental abnormalities."

73 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Duh! by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Informative

    The photopolymer resins are usually UV cured. They contain chemicals that spit out free radicals to initiate polymerization. And you don't get a 100% cure.

    The paranoid in me wore double gloves when handling parts with liquid resin. Newer stuff might be safer. But the stuff I used was gene scrambling goo in my mind.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Duh! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Those liquid resins are harmless unless they're used in 3D printing, hence the headline. Also, non-liquid-resin 3D printing will cause birth defects in pregnant women.

    2. Re:Duh! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      FTFA, She used each printer to create disc-shaped parts, about an inch in diameter. Then she placed the discs in petri dishes with zebrafish embryos and studied survival rates and hatch rates and monitored for developmental abnormalities.

      It doesn't say in TFA, but did the petri dishes have water in them also? That could explain a lot about the fishes survival rates.

    3. Re:Duh! by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 2

      "Also, non-liquid-resin 3D printing will cause birth defects in pregnant women."

      What specifically are you referring to here, ABS / PLA filament (FDM) printers and printed parts, or cured photopolymer resin parts?

      Also, citation?

    4. Re:Duh! by Triklyn · · Score: 2

      I'd also like a citation, but don't think he really needs a citation to warn caution.

      development is super finicky and super-conserved evolutionarily.

      I would imagine it would be the best course for any pregnant women to take extreme care until they do more studying.

      if animal trials are good enough for us to label things carginogens, a 100 percent developmental disability rate should be warning sign enough.

    5. Re:Duh! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      i'm just going to assume yes since some of them hatched.

    6. Re:Duh! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      "3D Printed Objects", obviously. Did you not read the headline?

    7. Re:Duh! by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for two things: clarification of his sentence structure, and more detailed documentation on the birth defects he's talking about - exposure values, developmental windows during exposure, type of defects, as much data as he can cite.

      I have a wife who is seven months pregnant and a 3D printer that mostly runs ABS. You do the math about why I'm digging for detailed info.

    8. Re:Duh! by kelemvor4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm looking for two things: clarification of his sentence structure, and more detailed documentation on the birth defects he's talking about - exposure values, developmental windows during exposure, type of defects, as much data as he can cite.

      I have a wife who is seven months pregnant and a 3D printer that mostly runs ABS. You do the math about why I'm digging for detailed info.

      Keep your parts away from that woman!

    9. Re:Duh! by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      So... important safety tip everyone: do not use a 3D-printed dildo while pregnant until further notice ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    10. Re:Duh! by Triklyn · · Score: 2

      i'd say go full quarantine on that for the remaining 2 months regardless. If it's a hobby.

      if you're not able to put it on ice for a couple of months, leave it at work, and go full hazmat. gloves, mask, shower, the works.

      brain development continues for like half a decade too. but that should be less risky.

    11. Re:Duh! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      I wonder how large the difference is between 3D printer resin and the stuff my dentist uses - especially since the UV exposure time for dental resin seems really short. Mercury amalgam fillings are probably bad for health, but maybe resin fillings aren't a whole lot better.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    12. Re:Duh! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Well, Riverside is a desert community. It's a mistake that anyone from Riverside could have made.

    13. Re:Duh! by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      that community name is just cruel then

    14. Re:Duh! by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 3, Funny

      I do believe we've already established, in several ways, that it's a bit late for that...

    15. Re:Duh! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Riverside is right next to a fairly decent-sized river in the Jurupa Valley. It is the upstream diversion and such that makes it so that the river isn't constantly a flood plain.

      Lots of gold to find out there. I've gotten plenty from just working black sands directly in the Santa Ana River.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Duh! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The paranoid in me wore double gloves when handling parts with liquid resin.

      That's not paranoid. Paranoia is an irrational fear. Your concerns are rational. You may be overreacting a little, but that's probably safer than under-reacting. I use double gloves for hydrofluoric acid, but not for general organics.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by psergiu · · Score: 4, Funny

    So ... bad news for all the geeks that 3D printed their beverage cups ?

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  3. Maybe not such a good idea by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Interesting
  4. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    What kind of cyanide does it release? Potassium cyanide is solid at room temperature. And my room is 80F most times of the year, so hydrogen cyanide would be a gas.

  5. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are not too likely to reproduce anyway.

  6. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by jabuzz · · Score: 5, Informative

    You need food grade plastics to print items that are going to be used in the preparation and consumption of food. As far as I am aware there is no such thing as a food grade ABS plastic. You can purchase food grade PLA for 3D printing however.

  7. whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gotta like it when this stuff is discovered by accident. Do we have safeguards against putting the latest industrial chemical product into contact with millions of people? Seems like we don't.

    1. Re:whoops by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Humans aren't zebra fish, so this doesn't mean that it's toxic to humans. Worth investigating? Yeah, but this alone doesn't mean a whole lot.

      Bt, which is completely harmless to humans, is highly toxic to invertebrates. Or if you want to get closer to home, cocoa is very toxic to some mammals (especially dogs) but not at all toxic to humans.

      The only thing this really says so far is that you probably shouldn't dump anything 3d printed into a freshwater environment that has wild fauna.

    2. Re:whoops by pla · · Score: 1

      And Agent Orange only affects trees - Why, I once saw a guy drink a cup full of it in a Vietnam documentary, and it didn't affect him at all!

      / This message brought to you by the Callous Dowboys

    3. Re:whoops by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      developmental pathways are highly conserved. I'd be fairly alarmed/concerned about this messing with pregnancies. definitely warrants further study, and highly publicized warnings for pregnant women.

    4. Re:whoops by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      As you'll note above, I said it is worth investigating, but for the time being there's no evidence that it is harmful to humans.

      And by the way, everything else I've mentioned has been proven safe. Bt has been in use as a pesticide for almost a century now. Chances are you personally have consumed quite a bit of it; at least, if you eat fresh vegetables anyways (organic or otherwise.)

    5. Re:whoops by Triklyn · · Score: 2

      people study fruit flies to better understand the mechanisms of human development. if it ain't broke don't fix it, etc. etc.

      what messes with zebra-fish embryos may very well mess with a human embryos. things that have to happen during development regardless of the species, like axonal guidance, body orientaton, segmentation of different areas, differentiation signals. fruit flies need them, zebrafish need them, and we need them, and some are so fundamental that they haven't changed between the sea and us.

      that's why it's worrying. a mature human isn't susceptible to a crap ton of stuff that would kill off a zebrafish, but a human embryo isn't so different from a zebrafish one.

      human embryos have gill slits... cuz if it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it's wholly unnecessary but ain't hurting nothing, don't fix it either.

    6. Re:whoops by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Or if you want to get closer to home, cocoa is very toxic to some mammals (especially dogs) but not at all toxic to humans.

      Actually, the reason is a component of chocolate is toxic to dogs because they can't metabolize it fast enough so it builds up and poisons them. It's call theobromine, and the darker the chocolate, the higher the concentration. It's a mild simulant like caffeine. Humans are generally larger animals so not only do we require more chocolate, our livers are able to process it far faster.

      it is possible to be poisoned, but it requires eating a LOT of chocolate really quickly. Which practically speaking is such a large quantity to be impractical for humans.

    7. Re:whoops by ultranova · · Score: 1

      As you'll note above, I said it is worth investigating, but for the time being there's no evidence that it is harmful to humans.

      They liquid form is definitely harmful, according to Formlab material safety sheets (bottom of page). A more interesting question is: what if you wash the object first? After all, the Form 1 printer solidifies the object inside a tank filled with the liquid form, so it'll inevitably end up carrying some for a while after manufacture. So does the harmful effect come from the solid object itself (that is, material dissolving from it) or from leftover liquid resin, which will wear off pretty soon (and could potentially be solved by re-lasering the finished object)?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re: whoops by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      You gotta get into dosages and stuff with that methinks. At a molecular level we're all just heaps of congealed particles rubbing against each other. You touch something, some of you clings to it, some of it clings to you. I wouldn't lick my finger even if its dry at the touch is what I'm saying

  8. Headline fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A more accurate headline would be: "Some 3D Printer consumables toxic to certain fish"

    The toxicity is not an attribute of manufacturing process. It's an attribute of the material with which it's manufactured.

    Sensationalized headlines are in poor taste. Slashdot can be much better than this.

    1. Re:Headline fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mostly take your point but it is still not quite accurate to say the consumables must be to blame. It is possible that the products themselves are to blame when their inputs are not. That is, it could be an attribute of the manufacturing process and not the material.

      Processes can produce carcinogens from non-carcinogens, for example. Trivially, burning does.

    2. Re:Headline fail by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sensationalized headlines are in poor taste. Slashdot can be much better than this.

      You must be new here. No it can't.

    3. Re:Headline fail by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Even simpler: "Plastic toxic to some fish"

    4. Re:Headline fail by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this.

      And plastics which have likely not been deemed food safe, or otherwise been studied for their safety.

      I mean, has anybody spent any time looking at the composition of these plastics and said "gee, should we be handling this, or making forks from it?".

      I assume at this point, it's totally untested, and just whatever random plastics had the right material properties.

      And, really, just how hard is it to be toxic to the embryos of zebrafish?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Headline fail by Shadowhawk · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      My mind works like lightning. One brilliant flash and it is gone.
    6. Re:Headline fail by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Sensationalized headlines are in poor taste. Slashdot can be much better than this.

      I assume you mean in some abstract, theoretical way?

  9. Just about everything is toxic to fish by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As anyone who ever had a fish tank will tell you.

    What would be amazing is if they found things not normally in the egg that weren't toxic to the embryos.

    1. Re:Just about everything is toxic to fish by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Most plastics leach curing agents, plasticizers and monomers after they are manufactured. None of this is surprising.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  10. Parts of 3D Printers? by Scott+Tracy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The summary reads like he took apart a 3D printer then threw various components from it in a fish tank. I was left wondering why anyone would do that.

    1. Re:Parts of 3D Printers? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      He was probably doing an experiment where various objects were presented to fish to gauge their reaction (e.g. stress level as measured by die-off rate) or using the 3D printer to make environmental obstacles to control the behavior of the fish.

      It's certainly possible the fish embryos saw the 3D printer parts and died from hype overdose.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  11. PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by jddj · · Score: 1

    Would seriously like to know whether they were using PLA or ABS filament for their "not as toxic" melted-plastic machine test.

    I'm printing exclusively with PLA at home, but have no idea which they're talking about.

    1. Re:PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you would think that the names of the materials use would be the slightest bit interesting to readers of this article. Perhaps the editor didn't want to alarm anyone, and removed that information.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    2. Re:PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by ProfessorDoom · · Score: 2

      They tested on a Formlabs and a Stratasys Dimension Elite. The Dimension is an ABS plastic, the formlabs SLA printer is Methacrylate Photopolymer Resin. I'm feeling okay about my PLA printer.

    3. Re:PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      ABS filament for the FDM (melting plastic machine), methacrylates (and photoinitiator compounds, etc) for the stereolithography machine. The original paper in Enviromental Science & Technology Letters is available (with ACS paywall) here.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    4. Re: PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by jddj · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Then my mind goes to: "so we know not a lot about PLA in the same scenario", except that it's generally well-regarded for safety.

    5. Re:PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by Nemesisghost · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the kind of material is almost as important as the type of printer, especially when there are several different materials that can be used in each of the different printer types.

    6. Re:PLA or ABS used for the melty-machine test? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The university press release is also lacking it.

  12. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by pla · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can purchase food grade PLA for 3D printing however.

    Hey now, lets not resort to cannibalism here! What'd I ever do to you???

  13. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if even food grade plastics would effect fish embryos. Things like traces of soap, which is completely safe for humans readily effect fish.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  14. So much for Project Shellter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So Makerbot called on people to help make hermit crab shells to dump in the waters....
    guess that's a bit of a bad idea now.

    http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2011/10/18/project-shellter-can-the-makerbot-community-save-hermit-crabs

  15. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by TWX · · Score: 2

    There are potable-water applications for ABS pipe. I expect that means it's possible to have food-grade ABS plastic at least if certain conditions are met. On top of that ABS is often used in the housings of plastic kitchen appliances, so it still has to be safe for incidental exposure.

    I wonder if the process that is used to injection-mold or to extrude ABS gives it different properties than the 3d-print method that may not subject the material to the same pressures.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  16. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    It's not cannibalism since your name "pla" translates to "fish" in Thai.

    Well played, though.

  17. Re:Sure fire way not to pick up chicks by meerling · · Score: 1

    "As I kill them with toxic plastic objects I made. Wanna see my fish skull montage?"

  18. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Bullshit.
    I've been using soap all my life and I haven't had any fish spring up where I use my soap.

    effect/affecttttttttttttt

  19. Bummer by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    In other news: 3d-printed guns harmful to humans.
    Who would have thought.

  20. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by Adriax · · Score: 1

    Check to see if he has a Californian cancer warning sticker.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  21. Re:Who cares? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2

    OK, don't print little pirate treasure chests for zebra-fish aquaria, got it.

    Who cares? The problems with chemical stupidity are not just about one species of fish. Unfortunately a large portion of our population relies upon the riches of the sea. If we keep screwing up the oceans with out industrial waste, especially discarded by products and plastic garbage we will see a rapid collapse of the entire ocean biosphere. It will mean starvation on a huge scale. Your statement bespeaks volumes about the utter public ignorance of key biological systems that have given us life. You can claim ignorance because most people do not even care about what is happening because of unrestrained garbage in our oceans, those who know the truth about the unregulated dumping of toxic plastic garbage that is causing the garbage patches do not have the luxury of ignorance that you enjoy.

    As you bury your head in the beach sand it is almost certain that you will also be covered in little pieces of plastic that are starting to kill fish on a global scale. large plastics the big pictureabout how and why plastics are killing more and more marine life as they break down into smaller and smaller pieces and are eaten by smaller and smaller organisms.

    With the oil and plastic industry now dictating our future it is entirely possible that our chemical stupidity will cause global starvation in the next century. Either we pay attention to the environment on a global scale or we will suffer the consequences of shitting in our own nest to the extent that our environment will simply kill us off. Here is hoping that eventually we can create closed systems with the plastic industry but right now the recycling of plastics and the science to stop the toxic destruction of our world is not a priority, within the next 40 years we either stop putting toxins in the ocean or we will not survive as a species. End of story.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  22. Re:Who cares? by Triklyn · · Score: 2

    developmental mechanisms and pathways are highly conserved.
    we don't want a repeat of thalidomide

  23. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Not sure that would help. How to tell if something has a Californian cancer warning sticker:
    1: Is it in California?
    A: Yes - It has a sticker.
    B: No - It does not.

    (One of my favorites was a bottle of balsamic vinegar that advertised itself as being "certified organic" on the label and had a California sticker warning that it contained lead.)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  24. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    And cyanide is liquid at room temperature.

    WHAT cyanide, you dick? Cyanide isn't a free standing thing.

    And before any pricks start hitting Google, I know what cyanoogen is, thank you very much, and it's not the same thing.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    In Ontario wines need to put on the label if they contain sulfites. Not if any has been added to the wine, just if the wine contains any. Since sulfites are a byproduct of fermentation all wine contains some and so every wine in Ontario has that stupid message on the label, even the organic wines. If there's a message it should be either stating that sulfites have been added or giving the concentration of sulfites.

    Mind you I'm extremely sensitive to the taste of sulfites so that I notice them even in organic wines. In fact there's only one wine that I do like because I don't taste them.

  26. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    No, ABS does not outgas HCN.

    There is a report out there about a flame test of nylon carpeting, which was found to off gas HCN while burning.

    3D printing does not burn the filament, nylon filaments do not off gas HCN, and ABS filament certainly doesn't either.
    =Smidge=

  27. Reminds me of by phil.swansborough · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of those old adverts for Radium, how it'll brighten your teeth etc etc. Maybe one day people will look back at all those Kickstarter videos for 3D printers they way we look at those.

  28. See? Another use for 3d printing by idontgno · · Score: 1

    3d printed fish contraception. Who knew it was this versatile!

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  29. Plastics tend to be toxic to fish by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    However, there are 3D printers working here at the UW which can bioprint solar cells on flexible film, and ones that can even bioprint compostable furniture NOT USING PLASTICS.

    Plastics are a transitory thing, in terms of what can be printed. Eventually, just as we can 3D print organs, we will do the same and move off plastics.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Plastics tend to be toxic to fish by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I think we're running 18 pct for the first batch, but they are flexible and the entire grid won't die if just one cell goes. Economies of scale and cost/yield still being worked on. I got to hold one in my hand last week.

      Not sure how much the inputs for the compostable 3D bioprinter are, or for the surgical bioorgan printer are. We tend to use off the shelf things a lot, drops costs, makes parts easier to find.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by psyclone · · Score: 1

    Not just Ontario, the labeling of containing sulfites is widespread. I agree, labels should only indicate if sulfites are added, but as you mentioned, sulfites are naturally occurring and a small amount are usually added to stop fermentation.

    Tip: white wines contain more sulfites than red wines.

  31. Re:Who cares? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

    hmmm, interesting read

    http://response.restoration.no...

    While it's true that these areas have a higher concentration of plastic than other parts of the ocean, much of the debris found in these areas are small bits of plastic (microplastics) that are suspended throughout the water column. A comparison I like to use is that the debris is more like flecks of pepper floating throughout a bowl of soup, rather than a skim of fat that accumulates (or sits) on the surface.

    That is precisely the problem, because the plastic breaks down into tidbits and some of the really nasty toxic ones become indistinguishable from the food that fish eat. Further to that sockeye salmon and other Oncorhynchus and fish everywhere are starting to show up with bellies full of plastics http://www.npafc.org/new/publi...

    Naturally the ocean gyres are slowly churning the plastics into smaller and smaller pieces and they are also breaking into bits on shorelines of islands and the continents. So it is not as if there is a great garbage dump out there but the truth is that there is a level of ongoing human caused pollution that is will eventually do permanent damage to much more than the ocean's key ecosystems.

    The alarmist videos and Fox News style environmental news shows do not show the real extent of the problem. They are not scientifically sound and are not really informing the public about the real problem with the world dominating petro industrial complex. Unfortunately the real problems are much more insidious and hidden as the quote I appended coming from your link clearly indicates.

    Perhaps it is far better instead to scare the shit out of people with videos like this one. Hopefully the extent of the real damage going on will finally be recognized by J. Q. Public, before another Bush league petro president takes over the reigns of power.

    Even Obama has stated that a lack action to change our attitudes towards the abuse of our shared environment by not being able to halt the dismissal of science, largely by the rich industry lobbies in Washington, is one of the greatest regrets he will have when he surrenders the reigns of power. Truth is it does not matter who becomes the President anymore the government is now run by the industry lobbies not the people and certainly not by truth!

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  32. How does this answer the question? by blindseer · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "Other unanswered questions include how to dispose of the waste material â" both solid and liquid â" created by 3-D printers. At this point, the researchers think it is best to take it to a hazardous waste center."

    So how does the hazardous waste center dispose of the material if they don't yet know what aspect of the 3D printed part makes it hazardous? I assume there is a catch all process for such materials, like sealing it up real tight into something that won't leak and dropping it down a really deep hole. Perhaps another catch all is heat it up so hot that any molecules in the material are broken down to their constituent atoms.

    Also, once we know what makes them hazardous then it is quite possible we can find a means to remove that aspect of the material and/or find a means for a user of that material to perform whatever process is necessary to render it inert. Such as if the process is to expose the 3D printed product to UV light then tell the manufacturer or user that it should be left out in the sunlight for how many hours it takes to destroy the hazardous material. For some items, like wind chimes and license plate holders, the UV exposure would be expected in normal use.

    While this is certainly interesting it seems to me that this article is click bait, scaremongering, or both. Lots of people have been using 3D printed products without any health problems showing up. This is really something that should be of interest only to fish breeders and material scientists.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  33. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by pz · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, the world is your straight man, and you just gotta celebrate when it happens!

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  34. Re:ABS releases cyanide when heated by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    I like that one - tap water causes cancer...

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..