Slashdot Mirror


Justice Officials Fear Nation's Biggest Wiretap Operation May Not Be Legal (usatoday.com)

schwit1 writes with news about a vast wiretapping program and questions about its legality. USA Today reports: "Federal drug agents have built a massive wiretapping operation in the Los Angeles suburbs, secretly intercepting tens of thousands of Americans' phone calls and text messages to monitor drug traffickers across the United States despite objections from Justice Department lawyers who fear the practice may not be legal. Nearly all of that surveillance was authorized by a single state court judge in Riverside County, who last year signed off on almost five times as many wiretaps as any other judge in the United States. The judge's orders allowed investigators — usually from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration — to intercept more than 2 million conversations involving 44,000 people, federal court records show."

27 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. but its working by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look how the narcotics trafficking and related crimes have plummeted in California. Oh wait that's because pot is legal now, nevermind

    1. Re:but its working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      False equivalence.

      Murder is clearly a crime with a victim. Recreational drug use is arguably a victimless crime, when done responsibly. This is why alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine are legal despite being extremely addictive and bad for one's health. The exact same reasoning applies to most recreational drugs.

      Furthermore, there isn't a black market for murder. People committing murder illegally doesn't fund a mafia to the point of being so powerful that it threatens entire governments (and, of course, reigns terror on innocents). People using drugs illegally does precisely that.

      So, the reasons why murder are illegal don't apply to recreational drug use. There are clear benefits to making recreational drug use legal, and murder has none of these benefits.

      Logic shows the way. Your thoughtlessness does not.

    2. Re: but its working by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

      >anti-drug laws that do no good and make no sense

      You must be new here. Follow the money.

      https://youtu.be/5_UbAmRGSYw

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:but its working by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Look how the narcotics trafficking and related crimes have plummeted in California. Oh wait that's because pot is legal now, nevermind

      No, pot is still illegal here, MMJ is what's legal. It's a distinction with only a legal difference. In places where pot actually is legal, like CO, drug crime has truly plummeted.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:but its working by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "Furthermore, there isn't a black market for murder. "

      Isn't that called Craigslist?

    5. Re:but its working by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      No. There really is no market for murder. Even in the rare instance where someone seriously seeks out such a market, they end up talking to the police, or finding some unstable fool. The only market for murder is the military contracting one, and you need a lot of dough and connections to use that.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  2. Huh? Illegal? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Illegal? When has that ever stopped the government?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Huh? Illegal? by NotInHere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Certainly not when a high ranking taliban was treated in a doctors without borders hospital, and the US government started bombing that hospital, breaking international treaties, killing innocents, burning down a hospital.

    2. Re:Huh? Illegal? by crackerjack155 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes actually they should be treating them because they are not combatants in the fight between the USA and Taliban. It's also been pretty well established that doctors are supposed to treat anyone regardless of who they are or what side of the fight they are on. It is also well established in international law that it is illegal for any side in a fight to attack a hospital unless that hospital is actively attacking you, regardless of who is in it.

      Someone attacking a known non combatant hospital is a war crime and it doesn't matter if the entire leadership of the Taliban was being treated inside it and you had no other way of getting them all.

      If it is actually true that it happened, that they knew it was a hospital and nobody from in the hospital was actively attacking them, then everyone involved from the pilot to the person giving the order belongs in prison for a long time.

    3. Re:Huh? Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you expect doctors to fight your ideological battles that's your prerogative. Just don't turn around and act surprised if the surgeon holding a knife over you decides to fight someone else's ideological battles where you're the bad guy.

    4. Re:Huh? Illegal? by Sique · · Score: 2

      A doctor has to treat everyone without looking at the person. That's part of being a doctor. A doctor has to treat a mobster, a child molester and also a taliban. It was that way when Hippocrates formulated the Hippocratic Oath, it was that way when Henri Dunant founded the Red Cross and laid the foundation to the Geneva Convention.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re: Huh? Illegal? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      "Rules of war"? You mean Geneva convention and other applicable international law, right?

      Sure, but who enforces them?

      Answer: Whomever wins the war.

      I didn't say it was a pretty system, I simply explained what the system was.

  3. America by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My tag line says it all.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. Time to rethink the "war on drugs" by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, isn't it about time to rethink the war on drugs? It should be pretty damn obvious, to even a politician, that casual drug users are not an infinitesimally small minority of the population. How about plowing all of that money into education and actual rehabilitation. Besides, we always have the war on terror as an excuse to violate the Constitution when needed.

    1. Re:Time to rethink the "war on drugs" by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      It's also pretty obvious that the private prison industry is huge and lobbies extensively.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:Time to rethink the "war on drugs" by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's also pretty obvious that the private prison industry is huge and lobbies extensively.

      If only it were just the private sector... Public sector prison guards have powerful lobbying through their unions.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Time to rethink the "war on drugs" by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Not just unions, law enforcement agencies also lobby for their slice of the $10B/pa taxpayer pie known as "the war on drugs". The fact that a public service institution can "lobby" the government is bizarre, their sole purpose is to implement policy not dictate it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  5. The Words of the former NSA Tech Director by rea1l1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If I am anywhere in the USA, and am talking on my cellphone, can the government hear me? And are they recording? And can they use it against me at any time?"

    "Yes." -- Bill Binney, former NSA Tech Director. Worked for NSA 37 years

    also:

    "Bulk surveillance is not necessary to protect anybody. NSA tries to track everyone on the planet. google: the program Treasuremap. OS's are absolutely not safe!" -- Bill Binney, former NSA Tech Director. Worked for NSA 37 years

    https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/...

  6. "May"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you're so far over the line that the DOJ says "hey, you might have gone a little too far," that's a pretty good sign you're well into "clearly illegal" territory.

    Not, of course, that the DOJ would ever actually take up a case against a law enforcement office breaking the law. Heaven forfend.

  7. Meanwhile... by Will_Malverson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the rest of us fear it may be legal.

  8. "Fear" ? by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because law enforcement personnel sometimes face consequences when they do something illegal?

  9. Wait... by webdog314 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If this judge works 52 weeks a year (no vacation), and a typical 40 hour work week (without breaks or lunch), and we assume that "conversations involving 44,000 people" requires that each call (warrant) requires at least 2 people (22,000 warrants max), then this judge would need to approve one of these more than once every six minutes!

    1. Re:Wait... by Livius · · Score: 2

      They're just reading the line that says "authorized by" and writing their name. They can do that in less than six minutes.

  10. Looks bad or unconstitutional??? by fred911 · · Score: 2

    that's why they've made up parallel construction.

    http://thefreethoughtproject.c...

    It's way past time that we encrypt and obfuscate all communication.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  11. Nation's 'BIGGEST' wiretap operation, HA HA! by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I love the headline (really do, no /sarc) because it really shocks the monkey. It brings to mind some hypothetical Ouija Board conversation with say, a channeled framer of the Constitution or Machiavelli or Stalin --- using the USB interface Ouija Board I built for faster throughput. I will market it as IRC for the Dead. Once the modern definition of 'wiretap' is cleared up it really gets rolling.

    FRANKLIN: I take it you mean the interception of private letters? We affix waxen seals to guard against casual inspection should carriers desire to do this, though there are some with great skill in revealing their contents. Steam from a kettle is often employed. But it is surely an unreasonable search for a government to do so. We also at times employ clever codes.
    MACHIAVELLI: It is hard to imagine why such inspection would be desired for the massive daily packets that traverse cities, nations and oceans. Would not the burden of reading become tiresome?
    STALIN: I instruct my post office to tear everything open whether there is time to read them or not. They rifle and crumple the contents. Some times they even stain the letters with wine to give correspondents the impression that there was a great feast and their precious documents were passed hand to hand and read aloud. In order to preserve equanimity the State must keep all persons on uneven footing.

    ME: In these times hardly anyone speaks in code and there are no seals. We speak into our devices plainly, and the paper packet has become a flowing river of letters passed over wires. Any communication can span the globe.

    FRANKLIN: No seals and plain speech everywhere. What an enlightened time!
    MACHIAVELLI: So those who talk greatly outnumber those who might listen? In the cacophony of such a mob secrets may be shouted yet unheard.
    STALIN: This is madness. Every telephone conversation across the border had a listener. If one was not available the operator would ring you back, at times days later. Shut it all down before it is too late.
    FRANKLIN: Surely our government takes steps to protect its citizens from having their conversations heard by hostile governments?

    ME: You guys are so behind the times. These are not just voices, everyone is identified and it so happens that the United States Government does most of the listening throughout the entire world, even and especially to its own citizens. People all over the world consider us scoundrels for doing this. They can even store voices and play them back years later. If a tyrant should arise, the Militia will discover that their own names and entire personal histories are laid bare, so the tyrant can clean house more efficiently than any in history.

    FRANKLIN: How... can.... this.... be?? No,no no!-------- LOST CARRIER
    MACHIAVELLI: How crude and uninteresting. So this is a simple story of gross stupidity and madness then. Ah, and I had hoped that as time progressed the plots of men would become more intricate. I think I will leave now to find a more suitable parallel existence.
    MACHIAVELLI <has left the channel>
    STALIN: Now it gets interesting. Tell me more about your government's so-called 'wiretaps'.

    ME: Well, which one? I mean there are so many. You have
    Local policemen tracking people with their phones, able to follow their position. The voices are inside their boxes and with a flip of the switch they could hear them. They're only supposed to flip that switch if they have permission.
    It is the law under the CALEA Act that our telephone companies be able to simultaneously intercept as much as 1 in 100 conversations in cities...
    Under FISA people can be followed everywhere in the country and listened to with no involvement by local police and judge.
    The DEA, Treasury and IRS can do pretty much anything they want, they rely on judges that rubber stamp requests.
    The NSA is a spy organization like your KGB that was bound by charter

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  12. Re:Nullify the Grand Jury by cdrudge · · Score: 2

    You'd never make it past voir dire.

  13. Craigslist by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2

    I want you to get this fuck where he breathes! I want you to find this nancy-boy, I want him DEAD! I want his family DEAD! I want his house burned to the GROUND! I wanna go there in the middle of the night and I wanna PISS ON HIS ASHES!

    $500 OBO Call Dread Pirate Roberts at 555-238-1212

    principals only

    do NOT contact me with unsolicited services or offers

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.