Slashdot Mirror


Justice Officials Fear Nation's Biggest Wiretap Operation May Not Be Legal (usatoday.com)

schwit1 writes with news about a vast wiretapping program and questions about its legality. USA Today reports: "Federal drug agents have built a massive wiretapping operation in the Los Angeles suburbs, secretly intercepting tens of thousands of Americans' phone calls and text messages to monitor drug traffickers across the United States despite objections from Justice Department lawyers who fear the practice may not be legal. Nearly all of that surveillance was authorized by a single state court judge in Riverside County, who last year signed off on almost five times as many wiretaps as any other judge in the United States. The judge's orders allowed investigators — usually from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration — to intercept more than 2 million conversations involving 44,000 people, federal court records show."

13 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. but its working by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look how the narcotics trafficking and related crimes have plummeted in California. Oh wait that's because pot is legal now, nevermind

    1. Re:but its working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      False equivalence.

      Murder is clearly a crime with a victim. Recreational drug use is arguably a victimless crime, when done responsibly. This is why alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine are legal despite being extremely addictive and bad for one's health. The exact same reasoning applies to most recreational drugs.

      Furthermore, there isn't a black market for murder. People committing murder illegally doesn't fund a mafia to the point of being so powerful that it threatens entire governments (and, of course, reigns terror on innocents). People using drugs illegally does precisely that.

      So, the reasons why murder are illegal don't apply to recreational drug use. There are clear benefits to making recreational drug use legal, and murder has none of these benefits.

      Logic shows the way. Your thoughtlessness does not.

    2. Re: but its working by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

      >anti-drug laws that do no good and make no sense

      You must be new here. Follow the money.

      https://youtu.be/5_UbAmRGSYw

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  2. Huh? Illegal? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Illegal? When has that ever stopped the government?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Huh? Illegal? by crackerjack155 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes actually they should be treating them because they are not combatants in the fight between the USA and Taliban. It's also been pretty well established that doctors are supposed to treat anyone regardless of who they are or what side of the fight they are on. It is also well established in international law that it is illegal for any side in a fight to attack a hospital unless that hospital is actively attacking you, regardless of who is in it.

      Someone attacking a known non combatant hospital is a war crime and it doesn't matter if the entire leadership of the Taliban was being treated inside it and you had no other way of getting them all.

      If it is actually true that it happened, that they knew it was a hospital and nobody from in the hospital was actively attacking them, then everyone involved from the pilot to the person giving the order belongs in prison for a long time.

  3. America by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My tag line says it all.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. Time to rethink the "war on drugs" by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, isn't it about time to rethink the war on drugs? It should be pretty damn obvious, to even a politician, that casual drug users are not an infinitesimally small minority of the population. How about plowing all of that money into education and actual rehabilitation. Besides, we always have the war on terror as an excuse to violate the Constitution when needed.

    1. Re:Time to rethink the "war on drugs" by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's also pretty obvious that the private prison industry is huge and lobbies extensively.

      If only it were just the private sector... Public sector prison guards have powerful lobbying through their unions.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  5. The Words of the former NSA Tech Director by rea1l1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If I am anywhere in the USA, and am talking on my cellphone, can the government hear me? And are they recording? And can they use it against me at any time?"

    "Yes." -- Bill Binney, former NSA Tech Director. Worked for NSA 37 years

    also:

    "Bulk surveillance is not necessary to protect anybody. NSA tries to track everyone on the planet. google: the program Treasuremap. OS's are absolutely not safe!" -- Bill Binney, former NSA Tech Director. Worked for NSA 37 years

    https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/...

  6. Meanwhile... by Will_Malverson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the rest of us fear it may be legal.

  7. "Fear" ? by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because law enforcement personnel sometimes face consequences when they do something illegal?

  8. Wait... by webdog314 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If this judge works 52 weeks a year (no vacation), and a typical 40 hour work week (without breaks or lunch), and we assume that "conversations involving 44,000 people" requires that each call (warrant) requires at least 2 people (22,000 warrants max), then this judge would need to approve one of these more than once every six minutes!

  9. Nation's 'BIGGEST' wiretap operation, HA HA! by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I love the headline (really do, no /sarc) because it really shocks the monkey. It brings to mind some hypothetical Ouija Board conversation with say, a channeled framer of the Constitution or Machiavelli or Stalin --- using the USB interface Ouija Board I built for faster throughput. I will market it as IRC for the Dead. Once the modern definition of 'wiretap' is cleared up it really gets rolling.

    FRANKLIN: I take it you mean the interception of private letters? We affix waxen seals to guard against casual inspection should carriers desire to do this, though there are some with great skill in revealing their contents. Steam from a kettle is often employed. But it is surely an unreasonable search for a government to do so. We also at times employ clever codes.
    MACHIAVELLI: It is hard to imagine why such inspection would be desired for the massive daily packets that traverse cities, nations and oceans. Would not the burden of reading become tiresome?
    STALIN: I instruct my post office to tear everything open whether there is time to read them or not. They rifle and crumple the contents. Some times they even stain the letters with wine to give correspondents the impression that there was a great feast and their precious documents were passed hand to hand and read aloud. In order to preserve equanimity the State must keep all persons on uneven footing.

    ME: In these times hardly anyone speaks in code and there are no seals. We speak into our devices plainly, and the paper packet has become a flowing river of letters passed over wires. Any communication can span the globe.

    FRANKLIN: No seals and plain speech everywhere. What an enlightened time!
    MACHIAVELLI: So those who talk greatly outnumber those who might listen? In the cacophony of such a mob secrets may be shouted yet unheard.
    STALIN: This is madness. Every telephone conversation across the border had a listener. If one was not available the operator would ring you back, at times days later. Shut it all down before it is too late.
    FRANKLIN: Surely our government takes steps to protect its citizens from having their conversations heard by hostile governments?

    ME: You guys are so behind the times. These are not just voices, everyone is identified and it so happens that the United States Government does most of the listening throughout the entire world, even and especially to its own citizens. People all over the world consider us scoundrels for doing this. They can even store voices and play them back years later. If a tyrant should arise, the Militia will discover that their own names and entire personal histories are laid bare, so the tyrant can clean house more efficiently than any in history.

    FRANKLIN: How... can.... this.... be?? No,no no!-------- LOST CARRIER
    MACHIAVELLI: How crude and uninteresting. So this is a simple story of gross stupidity and madness then. Ah, and I had hoped that as time progressed the plots of men would become more intricate. I think I will leave now to find a more suitable parallel existence.
    MACHIAVELLI <has left the channel>
    STALIN: Now it gets interesting. Tell me more about your government's so-called 'wiretaps'.

    ME: Well, which one? I mean there are so many. You have
    Local policemen tracking people with their phones, able to follow their position. The voices are inside their boxes and with a flip of the switch they could hear them. They're only supposed to flip that switch if they have permission.
    It is the law under the CALEA Act that our telephone companies be able to simultaneously intercept as much as 1 in 100 conversations in cities...
    Under FISA people can be followed everywhere in the country and listened to with no involvement by local police and judge.
    The DEA, Treasury and IRS can do pretty much anything they want, they rely on judges that rubber stamp requests.
    The NSA is a spy organization like your KGB that was bound by charter

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>