Slashdot Mirror


Social Media and the Age of Microcomplaints (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader writes: "Name an inequity, and it is highly likely that social media has helped call meaningful attention to it, if not started and hashtagged a movement," claims the NY Times. The article suggests people are much more willing to complain about meaningless issues now that they have a public audience. "The smartphone in particular has facilitated extemporaneous caviling. Irritations that the passage of time may have soothed can, in the moment, be immediately expressed to an audience." Further, an aggrieved social media post can lend more weight to a minor problem than the author ever intended, or than it deserved. An offhand tweet can lead to a nationwide media frenzy as people who aren't connected with a complaint's author lack perspective and emotional context for it.

119 comments

  1. Solution by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just microignore them.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re: Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just refuse to participate in social media at all

    2. Re:Solution by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just microignore them.

      That's a microagression! Not cool dude, not cool.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just microignore them.

      Or tell them to chill and have a microbrew.

    4. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a microagression! Not luke warm dude, not luke warm.
      : FTFY :

  2. Microaggressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I first read the term, I was confused. When I first read the tumblr about it, I was fluctuating between disgust and amusement.

    Now that I'm thinking about it, I think they have the term right. 1000 microaggressions makes a milliaggression, and 1000 milliaggressions form one standard aggression.
    Since most of us deal with dozens of aggressions each day, this provides a proper reference frame for just how blatantly sheltered and whiny anyone who counts microaggressions must be. Yes, all of you counting microaggressions, you can take my derision and disgust at your fragility as 1.13 milliagressions.

    1. Re:Microaggressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Careful, you might give someone PTSD over this post.

    2. Re:Microaggressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, everyone knows you can only get PTSD from twatter.

    3. Re:Microaggressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Triggered.

    4. Re:Microaggressions... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      If your calculations are correct, then my reasoning is as follows:

      When somebody accuses me of a microaggression, that's when I know I have to step it up a notch to a full-blown aggression. I don't like doing anything in a small way. With your calculations, though, it sounds like way too much work to get overly aggressive. So, I think I'll just stick to being normally aggressive and insult everybody an equal amount (wouldn't want to be perceived as unfair, now would I?), and let all be offended the same. Oh, and I love pissing people off!

      If someone is offended by anything I say or do, then all that means is that they're a lesser human being than I am and haven't evolved far enough yet. Or should I say "matured" far enough yet? It does seem that a lot of people in their early twenties show little or no maturity. Of course they're immature - they haven't lived long enough yet! Why do we even let them vote?

      If any of this makes sense, understand that it wasn't intended to at all.

    5. Re:Microaggressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you just might be offensive.

    6. Re:Microaggressions... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      When I first read the term, I was confused

      Just think of them as crybullies, then it makes more sense. WTF is "microagression" anyway?

    7. Re:Microaggressions... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Personally, if someone accuses me of a microaggression I will not be satisfied until they have received at minimum a full five aggressions from me. If they are a vegan or feminist, which is almost a certainty, they may receive a decaaggresion instead.

  3. Too many self-absorbed people by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are far to many people walking around in a fog of narcissism thinking that everything is about them. Take, for example, that pretentious asshat that is Bono commenting on the Paris attacks saying that the terrorists were targeting music. News flash, Bono, this isn't about you.

    1. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are too many news articles about morons getting their panties in a twist over a Christmas sweater or a red cup.

    2. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The day my life became amazing was the day I realized that people spend far, far, far less time thinking about me as I do thinking about how they think about me.

    3. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash, RogueWarrior65, Bono makes a lot more people smile than you do.

    4. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, dude, it COULD HAVE BEEN BONO in that audience! My God, if he was hurt then the terrorists would have won.

    5. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by thedonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are too many news articles about morons getting their panties in a twist over a Christmas sweater or a red cup.

      There are far more "news" articles about people getting the panties in a twist over a Christmas cup than there are people getting their panties in a twist over a Christmas cup.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    6. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      There are far to many people walking around in a fog of narcissism thinking that everything is about them.

      Well, isn't that kind the entire point of social media? Taking every aspect of your life and broadcasting as if it was some earth-shattering news?

      It's all about narcissism and thinking everything revolves around you. I thought that was the business model.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      There are far to many people walking around in a fog of narcissism thinking that everything is about them.

      They've always been around.

      It's one of the reasons that the smartphone is blamed for making people stupid.

      No, there are just as many stupid or smart people around as before. The unfortunate part is that things like computers and smartphones now put technology in the hands of the stupid, so now we have to listen to them bitch, whine, and say stupid things.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      TFA is flamebait. The second link is about how the media whips it up into a frenzy, not individuals. The first link is just the standard attack on millennials, who instead of complaining to their spouses complain on Twitter. The worst part is that the millennials actually have the right idea, because they get results. Companies hate having their support issues done in public, because they can't just fob the customer off or ignore them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The red cup was brilliant P. R.

    10. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is pretty much what the summary says ... a trifling thing gets a wide audience, and the fact that is gets a wide audience gives it a bigger audience.

      Basically social media is vacuous and self-referential, and the most trivial crap can get widespread attention for no good reason.

      I'm sure a tweet about some kid getting grounded can go viral and cause the entire world to start fretting over some kid who got grounded.

      Hell, it seems tailor-made to feed the careers of useless people like the Kardashians who are famous for ... well, nothing actually other than being famous and fucking famous people.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The point of social media was for people with computers keep in contact with their social acquaintances. It only turned into the festering pool of wrongful self importance when it became accessible to the general public. Remember when Myspace was a website for discovering local bands? The comments section became the entire site.

    12. Re: Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Companies HATE this new support request trick! Click here to find out how!

    13. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News flash: RogueWarrior65 doesn't think this is about himself. Do you even understand the concept of a guy saying something that's not about himself?

    14. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Well, isn't that kind the entire point of social media? Taking every aspect of your life and broadcasting as if it was some earth-shattering news?

      Is it? I would have said the merit of social media was the ability to share selected items with a particular audience that mostly can't be there in person. But probably I'm doing it wrong.

    15. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, as soon as it became necessary for someone to invent the phrase twitter shitter, social media had pretty much reached the point of being mostly about narcissism and pointless drivel.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    16. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

      IMHO, it's much worse now. People are seeing people like the Kardashians being famous for being famous and they are envious of that lifestyle. They too want fame and fortune that they haven't earned. That attitude bleeds over into people's daily lives. Next time you're driving around, notice how many people pull a full car-length past the painted stop line before they even consider stopping and how they would likely skip stopping if nobody was watching them because they are oh-so-important.

    17. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Except Bono never said that music was being "targeted" or implied it was anything about him.

      "This is the first direct hit on music that we've had in this so-called War on Terror or whatever it's called,"

      Which can just as easily mean music is just collateral damage.

      Your comment is the perfect example of someone being outraged at someone being upset based on something they didn't say. Which is exactly what one of TFAs is complaining about.

    18. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you're driving around, notice how many people pull a full car-length past the painted stop line

      One small nitpick. Those people always seem to be in a controlled stop, and one full car-length past the line is exactly where they mean to stop. But yes, inevitably, it's because they are oh-so-important (mostly because they do it because they can to prove to you that they're oh-so-important and the fucking rules just don't apply to them).

    19. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't mind him - right or wrong, he's mad because he's only number 2

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    20. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bono's singing sounds like Ned Beatty squealing in Deliverance.

    21. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Meh. For him to make this comment suggests that he thinks the other six attacks were irrelevant. Had he said that this was an attack on western civilization/values/activities/way-of-life I would agree with him. Where was he when Charlie Hebdo was attacked? The fact that a concert was attacked is irrelevant. It was a large soft target that happened to coincide with an exhibition soccer game and Friday night recreational activities when nobody had their guard up.

    22. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It's one of the reasons that the smartphone is blamed for making people stupid.

      No, there are just as many stupid or smart people around as before. The unfortunate part is that things like computers and smartphones now put technology in the hands of the stupid, so now we have to listen to them bitch, whine, and say stupid things.

      Well, wasn't one of the primary goals of the internet is to make everyone a publisher?

      Of course, I'm sure we HOPED people would use the communications ability of the Internet for good-for-humanity reasons like rooting out censorship or oppression, but in the end, we forgot it's really a great publishing medium for the idiotic to post stupid stuff.

      So yeah, we opened the ability for the masses to communicate. It's just the masses don't really care about "good for humanity" and really just care that their Amazon package arrived 2 hours late, or their food wasn't hot enough or other stupid crap. Heck, companies have to attend to every little triviality ("first world problems") now instead of being able to take care of the more important issues. Like instead of being able to devote resources to handling the customer that has a legitimate complaint, now they have to handle that customer amongst the 1000 others who are complaining they were short changed a penny or some crap like that.

    23. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about Sonny Bono?

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    24. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by sudon't · · Score: 1

      I remember when MySpace wasn't about bands. I remember when Facebook was for college students. They both came after Friendster, which came after the commercialization of the web. If we'd stuck with Gopher, Archie, and Veronica, we wouldn't be in this mess. Now, get off my internet, you damn kids!

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    25. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trees say otherwise.

    26. Re: Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :like

      no wait, this is slashdot
      "someone mod this insightful, I don't have mod points today"

    27. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, you're technically on a social media site right now.

    28. Re:Too many self-absorbed people by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Had he said that this was an attack on western civilization/values/activities/way-of-life I would agree with him.

      Yeah. That kind of observation would have made for a really insightful and original quote. Thanks Bono, you've just said what absolutely everyone else has already said.

      Where was he when Charlie Hebdo was attacked?

      I've no idea. Maybe no-one was looking for a comment off him at the time, because, as we've already all agreed, it wasn't about him.

      What is about him is that he was scheduled to have a gig in Paris directly after a similar gig had ended tragically and violently. So people wanted to know whether he intended going ahead, and what he had to say about it. So he obliged and naturally he's going to address things within a personal context that he has any qualification to speak on. Otherwise he's just repeating what hundreds have said before him.

      One wonders what you'd have had to say if he'd said "Don't ask me. I couldn't possibly comment, this has nothing to do with me, or the music industry, and personally, I just can't relate to that."

  4. this trend must stop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is causing huge problems! We must stop before it's too late! #stopmicrocomplaints #kwitcherbichin #nominorproblems

    1. Re: this trend must stop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not fair! #firstworldoppression

  5. Goes both ways by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microcomplaints may make a mountain out of a mole hill, but it may also give management (or at least someone higher up the food chain) and opportunity to earn back business.

    Several years ago I ordered a mattress online at Sam's club. I waited for it to be delivered. And waited. And waited. After missing several dates it turns out that their vendor screwed up the order and it never even went into manufacturing despite being told that it had really been shipped. None of the CSRs at Sam's club or the vendor really cared about me or gave me any options other than keep waiting. Walmart Corporate got a hold of me after I posted several microcomplaints online and satisfied my situation much in my benefit within a few hours. Instead of losing my business forever (especially since a Costco just recently opened, they earned it back).

    1. Re:Goes both ways by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Walmart Corporate got a hold of me after I posted several microcomplaints online and satisfied my situation much in my benefit within a few hours. Instead of losing my business forever (especially since a Costco just recently opened, they earned it back).

      Those were not microcomplaints on your part. That was a legit response to bad service.

      A microcomplaint is something like getting all pissed off about the font on the mattress not being bold instead of regular. Or taking a snowflake off of a coffee cup and igniting a shitstorm.

      Or me complaining that microcomplaint annoys my spell checker.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Goes both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a charming bitter fellow. Please stay at home special snowflake.

    3. Re:Goes both ways by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call any of your problems micro-complaints. Not being delivered on promised dates can be grounds for you to cancel the whole thing and get 100% refund. It may have been micro-complaints if the van that delivered the mattress looked trashy. Or how the delivery guys tracked mud onto your kitchen tile. etc.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Goes both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missing several dates? You should have canceled and demanded a refund by the second time it had happened.

    5. Re:Goes both ways by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      I'd stick with Costco. They have a very member-oriented attitude -- extra year warranty on electronics, generous return policy if you have any problems with the product and can't make headway with the manufacturer.

    6. Re:Goes both ways by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Nice #micropromo there Krishnoid /#microsnark

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:Goes both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your persistent re-use of the 'special snowflake' insult reveals a lot about you, even through the AC smokescreen. What exactly is going on with you I wonder, that you have such a vitriolic reaction to the very idea that a person has something going on that may possibly be unique or noteworthy. Not saying the person above does/not, but since I cannot even derive from that post how the hell you even made the leap that he is claiming 'snowflake' status, I can only assume your hyper-vigilance on that subject to be a nasty case of the projections. U mad bro?

    8. Re:Goes both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably unintentionally, they've given you a prime example of a "microcomplaint." Something trivial, non-important, imagined, and yet blown out of proportion by the response. In other words, they're an impotent man-child with nothing to satisfy them and no personality. Anyone with an even remote sense of self is a threat to their fragile ego. You can help them, you can make fun of them, you can ignore them, or you can cast scorn and derision in their direction with mockery and antagonistic behavior. Personally, I recommend the latter. It's amusing.

    9. Re:Goes both ways by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Walmart Corporate got a hold of me after I posted several microcomplaints online and satisfied my situation much in my benefit within a few hours. Instead of losing my business forever (especially since a Costco just recently opened, they earned it back).

      Those were not microcomplaints on your part. That was a legit response to bad service.

      A microcomplaint is something like getting all pissed off about the font on the mattress not being bold instead of regular. Or taking a snowflake off of a coffee cup and igniting a shitstorm.

      Or me complaining that microcomplaint annoys my spell checker.

      It's also something like complaining about your coffee being called black, or language that is not about race being suddenly about it--and, arguably, are more reflective of the person making the complaint than anything else. It suggests that they are viewing the world through a filter of race, religion, or the like.

      Though, I do agree the plain red cups were a mistake--they look more like somebody effed up the cup order. If what we were being promised is, say, a gradual appearance of seasonal symbols, I'd understand and think it actually pretty cool, but instead I feel just...like I've got a small child who is trying very hard to pretend that nothing wrong happened honest they're normally covered in flour/mud/blood. (And the sweater is probably going to end up an object lesson on why you make sure you don't cut corners in product testing--even when it's a sweater design, show it to people who don't know what it's supposed to be. If nothing else, you'll be certain that your 'cute polar bear' isn't 'dog(?)' to everybody else...)

    10. Re:Goes both ways by WillyTheSocialWeasel · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Slashdot, Truth Seeker! The 1st pair of letters is "NJ".

  6. Complainers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, look! People who never do anything for anyone are demanding things again. Let's all listen to them and take them seriously. Because that will help. They'll totally be satisfied and won't find something else to complain about tomorrow.

  7. Micropenis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This society discriminates against the micropenis. I am starting a movement to end this. Fairness and equality is a must in this modern day society which has no room for discrimination. I propose for every full bodied penis a woman fucks, she must fuck a micropenis.

    If you don't share this with all your friends you support discrimination. #micropenisrights

  8. Gamers Know All About This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An offhand tweet can lead to a nationwide media frenzy

    Like those tweets last year that kicked off the biggest video game moral panic since Columbine? Or would Slashdot prefer to keep singing that tune?

    1. Re:Gamers Know All About This by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Woulf you mind letting us know which tune we're supposed to be singing? So far all you've done is reference an event.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Gamers Know All About This by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That'd be the one where the media decided to smear gamers as "worse than isis, terrorists, terrorist supporters, harassers, misogynists," and three dozen other things. It hasn't stopped, if gamers at this point can be blamed for something the media does it. Even if facts don't fit the evidence, because it's convenient.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Gamers Know All About This by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      Firstly it's not clear why slashdot is supposed to singing that tune. Or are you just referencing the vent again?

      Nonetheless, I think you're confused. Ignoring your wild hyperbole about "worse than ISIS", the media didn't decide that gaters were worse than misogynists and harassers, they divided gaters *were* misogynists and harassers.

      But then doxxing someone and following up with phone calls about rape threats pretty much nails both definitions.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Gamers Know All About This by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      I'm not engaging in hyperbole. Devin Faraci was the "worse than ISIS" statements, and did an article on that, on top of the "he(sic) has more respect for ISIS.". And the media sure did decide, which is why you saw 14+ articles all coming out on the same day declaring gamers "over, dead, and no longer having to be your audience." Not to mention months of "GG is dead, but we're going to insert GG into everything and blame them for everything that's going wrong." Even the CBC's ombudsman agrees that the CBC itself engaged in behavior that labeled gamergate as something it wasn't.

      I'll bet you've got proof that GG and doxing someone right? After all, I keep asking people for proof and they don't have any. It's much like the media is now trying to label GG as the ones who made the photoshop of Vereender Jubbal. Of course, that of course wasn't true and it was members of GG that turned around and tried to get the media to correct it. And it was a member of ayyteam who did it, but since anti-gg believes in "no bad tactics" they're okay with smearing GG anyway.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Gamers Know All About This by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'm not engaging in hyperbole. Devin Faraci was the "worse than ISIS" statements,

      If that's true, then the guy's a moron. Of course, cherry picking one example and painting all of the media is kind of silly. Fox and Breitbard are also part of the media. One could cherry pick one of those and say "the media" paints Birmingham is a Muslim only town (for example) or something equally silly.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Gamers Know All About This by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      If that's true, then the guy's a moron. Of course, cherry picking one example and painting all of the media is kind of silly. Fox and Breitbard are also part of the media. One could cherry pick one of those and say "the media" paints Birmingham is a Muslim only town (for example) or something equally silly.

      Yes that's sadly true. Feel free to google his name and slap in isis and you'll see. That unfortunately isn't cherry picking one example. Since you can go to wired, gawker, kotaku, hackernews, various newspapers and they all print the same "gamergate is full of terrorists, misogynists, and rapists." With evidence that doesn't even exist. Strangely, at least in the cases where the media has printed stuff on Birgingham I haven't seen them say that it's a Muslim only town. Rather, that the local council and police refused to do anything about Muslim grooming gangs for fear of being labeled racist. Then again, that isn't an isolated incident either is it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:Gamers Know All About This by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Oh well done. How very smooth.

      First you find one nutjob who calls them worse than ISIS (I've not checked---for sake of argument I won't dispute it). You then say "unfortunately isn't cherry picking one example." but move straight on to less and less and less extreme versions.

      Makes it look like people comparing them to ISIS is common, without actually saying that. Very well done. Have you considered working as a spin doctor for a political party or as a writer for a newspaper?

      Strangely, at least in the cases where the media has printed stuff on Birgingham I haven't seen them say that it's a Muslim only town.

      Fox news don't have a print arm so that's not surprising.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re:Gamers Know All About This by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Oh well done. How very smooth.

      First you find one nutjob who calls them worse than ISIS (I've not checked---for sake of argument I won't dispute it). You then say "unfortunately isn't cherry picking one example." but move straight on to less and less and less extreme versions.

      Makes it look like people comparing them to ISIS is common, without actually saying that. Very well done. Have you considered working as a spin doctor for a political party or as a writer for a newspaper?

      Strangely, at least in the cases where the media has printed stuff on Birgingham I haven't seen them say that it's a Muslim only town.

      Fox news don't have a print arm so that's not surprising.

      In other words, you can't be bothered to look. Even if it's out there, especially when said nutjob has pull in the online media. And then I point out where said media is falling flat on it's face, but you don't seem to have a problem with the media lying through it's teeth. Maybe you can go look up the stuff written by NBC news, where a person named Izzy Galvez called gamergate "domestic terrorists."

      But since people are, and are using rhetoric, maybe, perhaps, you should consider you're wrong. That's a difficult thing to consider right? After all, that's not spinning, that's how far the media is willing to go in order to paint a story for you.

      I always like it when people trot out the "fox news" type of BS. It usually shows that the person in question doesn't like to consider things that might intrude on their per-conceived notions on something. FYI, we don't have fox news in Canada unless you pay for it on top-tier channels, and since I haven't had a TV in 17 years...you know what they say about assumptions right?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  9. Hypocrites by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    The article suggests people are much more willing to complain about meaningless issues now that they have a public audience.

    The article complains that people are much more willing to complain about meaningless issues now that they have a public audience.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article suggests people are much more willing to complain about meaningless issues now that they have a public audience.

      The article complains that people are much more willing to complain about meaningless issues now that they have a public audience.

      Oh man I really don't like all those people complaining about people who are complaining about meaningless issues in public forums I wish they would just stop complaining.

  10. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much the same as before. 99% of the world's truly horrific shit gets ignored to the point of festering evil and imminent death and ... oh look kittens playing with yarn and some neo-celebrity didn't like her burrito!

  11. It's called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Immaturity', an inability to meet the realities of life as a self-actualized adult. The media chase it for the ad revenue. That's pretty much it.

  12. Effect On Your Job by stonetony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Social media has created a new scary norm where that "nationwide media frenzy" (mob mentality) is the prosecutor, jury, and judge and your employer's fear of reputational risk is the executioner.

    It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong. Logic doesn't apply - only perception management.

    The new, widely-embraced form of discrimination is having an opinion different than that of the mob. Our laws need to adjust to form adequate civil protections.

    1. Re:Effect On Your Job by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Social media has created a new scary norm where that "nationwide media frenzy" (mob mentality) is the prosecutor, jury, and judge and your employer's fear of reputational risk is the executioner.

      It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong. Logic doesn't apply - only perception management.

      The new, widely-embraced form of discrimination is having an opinion different than that of the mob. Our laws need to adjust to form adequate civil protections.

      Yeah, we should amend the Constitution to ensure everyone has the freedom to express their opinion! ;-)

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:Effect On Your Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are anti-discrimination laws protecting numerous sub-groups of the population from workplace discrimination. Race, gender, religion, ethnicity, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, "gender identity", etc. I do not agree with these laws, but if we have them for those groups, why not protection for people who are expressing different opinions? That would put a new twist on the First Amendment by requiring .gov to not only refrain from restricting free speech, but to actively protect it.

    3. Re:Effect On Your Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse when "losing your job" is the expected outcome and desired outcome.

      Some of these people wake up in the morning with an agenda: "I must hurt someone today." They spend the rest of the day trying to find someone that agrees with them. A single bad view on the internet suddenly gains an air of legitimacy because it's echoed by several hundred other people. You can't form that critical mass in the real world because we're all too far apart and no-one talks enough to discover it.

      In other words: It's nice that we can reach anyone on the internet, but it's probably not best that we connect all the psychopaths.

    4. Re:Effect On Your Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's social networks not social media.

      Then the media frenzy chases that.

  13. opposite effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microcompliants will likely get drowned out by those who have big media bull horns.

    Sure there will be great responses from microcompliant once and awhile, but that will be far and between--the exception.

    Imagine if we had #youreholdingitwrong back in 2011-- that would have gotten drown out by the Apple media machine. And in some ways with traditional facebook, rededit, bbs, etc... it was drowned out by Apple media and nobody cared any more--though the problem made a lot of people waste $600.

  14. I literally cannot even by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    The level of entitlement people have today is overwhelming, and they're more than happy to share with you about how mad they are that Amazon sells "Fuck the Police" T-Shirts and how Starbucks doesn't have Christmas themed coffee cups anymore.

    Nobody gives a shit and neither should you, stop being so conceited.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    1. Re:I literally cannot even by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The level of entitlement people have today is overwhelming, and they're more than happy to share with you about how mad they are that Amazon sells "Fuck the Police" T-Shirts and how Starbucks doesn't have Christmas themed coffee cups anymore.

      Nobody gives a shit and neither should you, stop being so conceited.

      I have been told that the less one pays attention to the stupidity around them, the happier one is. I'm working on implementing that. It's not easy.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:I literally cannot even by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      I have been told that the less one pays attention to the stupidity around them, the happier one is. I'm working on implementing that. It's not easy.

      This couldn't be more true and your absolutely right.

      The more you know, the harder it is to sleep soundly at night.

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  15. If New York Times complains about it... by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If even the staunchly illiberal publications like New York Times and The Atlantic complain about there being too many grievances, it must, indeed, be a real problem.

    A problem, they helped facilitate, I might add. Because, when people are simply pursuing happiness, one can get a (sorely mistaken!!) impression, everything is right in the land of Capitalism — so, if causes for real complaints are gone, we must dig deeper to rouse up new ones. Somebody complimented your demeanour? They must be RACIST!.. Girls learn belly-dancing — to stay fit and please their boyfriends? They are appropriating! And so on.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, if this is cisgendered girls appropriate something or other...

      Eh, why the fuck should I care.

      Appropriating the female gender as my own since 1999. That's right, I was appropriating before it was hip.

    2. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      If even the staunchly illiberal publications like New York Times and The Atlantic complain about there being too many grievances, it must, indeed, be a real problem.

      Nah. They just hate Festivus and are against the very principles this country's founders exposed in the Declaration of Independence. So, basically, they hate America.

      See, that was easy, wasn't it?

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm glad you were able to air your grievance about people with grievances.

      Except my complaint about their bullshit is real while their bullshit is not. But why am I not surprised about your kind equating the incomparable?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 0

      You're pretty fuckin' dense if you think anything is wrong with that blog post on calling black people "articulate". I mean, Chris Rock makes the same point, and isn't he the excuse you trot out for being allowed to say the n-word?

      To think it is in the same league as that whiny Salon article demonstrates why right-wingers need to keep their damn mouths shut when it comes to social justice issues. All they seem capable of doing is giving more ammunition to the SJWs.

    5. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Except my complaint about their bullshit is real while their bullshit is not.

      "How dare you compare my bullshit to their bullshit!"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by mi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Darling, Slashdot is one of those forums, where ideas and arguments slightly bigger than what would fit on a bumper-sticker — or even a Tweet — are welcome. I suggest, you use that feature of the site next time you have something to say.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:If New York Times complains about it... by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You're pretty fuckin' dense if you think anything is wrong with that blog post on calling black people "articulate".

      Said the man, oops, the person, whose idea of "articulating" a point is to add curse-words to his/her/its/their speech.

      isn't he the excuse you trot out for being allowed to say the n-word?

      I don't need no negro's permission to say "negro", thank you very much. The word simply means "black" — as in "Negro Lives Matter" — and, incidentally, that's exactly, how Blacks are called in Ukrainian, Russian, and a whole host of other languages. It is perfectly neutral.

      right-wingers need to keep their damn mouths shut when it comes to social justice issues

      Oh, wow, maybe, you are articulate, after all! In one phrase you managed to violate all the rules:

      I'm going on a hunger strike in protest — until Slashdot editors apologize and resign for fostering an environment, which allowed you to mentally-rape me with your angry speech. Safe Zone! Safe Zone! Safe Zone!!! Please don't hate...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  16. Enjoying anger by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a lot of this is driven by the fact that many people have realised, consciously or otherwise, that they enjoy being angry. That they get some sort of validation or self-worth from it.

    A few months back, I dropped out of participation in a TV/movies forum I'd been a member of for years, largely due to a growing trend in "hate watching". This is where people would pick a show they hated, sometimes for artistic reasons but more commonly for political reasons, watch it all the way through and post in great acerbic detail about everything they hated about it. This, of course, led to people who liked that show jumping in to defend it and launching their own retaliatory "hate watches" and meant that more or less every thread broke down into a flamewar.

    Previously, people had just not watched shows they didn't like beyond the first episode or two. Everything was a lot more live-and-let-live. Problem was, of course, the forum's moderators realised that the hate watch flamewars were producing masses and masses of page-views and therefore advertising views. So instead of trying to dampen things down, they did everything they could to encourage it.

    This is part of the problem; the current financial model for most of the web (and social media in particular) is based around ad-views. As anger and outrage lead to lots of page-views, the financial incentive is to keep people in a state of perpetual quivering outrage.

    That's just part of the explanation, of course. I'd look to colleges for most of the rest.

    1. Re:Enjoying anger by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They realized that promoting grievances is a route to exercise unearned power over others. They "enjoy" it when it succeeds.

    2. Re:Enjoying anger by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "Previously, people had just not watched shows they didn't like beyond the first episode or two."

      Previously, there were only 3 things to watch at a time so you watched what was on whether you liked it or not..

    3. Re:Enjoying anger by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Rise of the Crybullies"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Enjoying anger by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      "Previously, people had just not watched shows they didn't like beyond the first episode or two."

      Previously, there were only 3 things to watch at a time so you watched what was on whether you liked it or not..

      Or turned it off, which helped encourage those three things to make an effort to have as broad appeal as possible since they had to compete with each other and the off switch.

  17. the internets.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    destroying civilization.... one byte at a time.

    using 'social media' automatically lowers your iq something like 40 points, and when most people on the internets are starting out with only 2 digits.... it's a pretty significant reduction.

  18. Back Before the World Wide Web... by jvp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the early 90s when websites were just being created and foisted upon us (yes, kids, there was an Internet (long) before there was a slashdot!) a funny and insightful friend said this, "I don't know about this new World Wide Web thing. It's going to make people think they're a resource." Blogs are one realization of her forecast. I see social media (and all the crap that goes on it) as another form of it.

    Did she ever call *that* one!

    --
    Jason Van Patten
    1. Re:Back Before the World Wide Web... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro.

    2. Re:Back Before the World Wide Web... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bruh.

  19. An offhand tweet by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    You mean, kinda like this?

    Now, we're not ones to go round spreadin' rumors
    Why really, we're just not the gossipy kind!
    Oh, you'll never hear one of us repeating gossip!
    So you'd better be sure and listen close the first time.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:An offhand tweet by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting that.

      I was thinking today, listening even to NPR is really distracting. What gets sold for news these days should be called "machine gun journalism". The solution is to listen to national news only when it affects you personally, which is probably on average about once a year. Listen to local stations that inform people (not editorialize) about local issues. The SAME issues until they either stagnate or change. Of course, nothing like that exists any more in the United States. It was back in the 1980's that the FCC struck down the Fairness Doctrine.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:An offhand tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is very sad to see that even NPR has succumbed to the clickbait phenomenon. They used to actually tell you things, now they don't even bother to answer the basic questions about the topics they bring up. There is no more fact checking of anything. They will tell you that someone said something but not bother to point out that fact that it is a blatant lie or give any context. "So and so said the world is flat... next story" WTF?.

  20. Microcomplaints equal by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    being a crybaby for the most part. Twitter & FB, have been 2 of the WORST things, for the most part, for the entire world. It's a prime example (for the USA) why the founding fathers were INTELLIGENT to set up our country, as a representative republic, and NOT an outright democracy. Democracy is nothing but touchy feely emotional rule. Use Ferguson as a prime example. FB, twitter blew up about how a white police officer, killed a "poor misunderstood gentle giant" who was running away from the officer. Then, by the time the FACTS in the case came out, that he had already fought the officer, tried to take his gun, was running TOWARD the officer...it was too late, the town was destroyed. With "instant" media comes a huge responsibility, but, in this day and age, we have no real media. What we have is "tmz media".

    1. Re:Microcomplaints equal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone is too afraid to miss out on reporting the latest rumors to bother fact checking.

  21. Tis the Season by rlp · · Score: 1

    Festivus - isn't it the season for airing of grievances?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  22. #NewsAtEleven by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    People are mostly part of one big stupid herd and social media allows them to increase the effectiveness and collusion of that herd. #NewsAtEleven

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  23. The math is sound by The+Last+Gunslinger · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think that scale sounds about right, since there's generally a one-in-a-million chance of my giving a shit about someone being offended.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Eugene Mirman by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "Vegan On His Way To The Complain Store"

  26. First, define "meaningless issues" by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Just because an issue is "meaningless" for you, doesn't imply it has no value for others.

    1. Re:First, define "meaningless issues" by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Just because an issue is "meaningless" for you, doesn't imply it has no value for others.

      Theres the good old 'reasonable person' test.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  27. War on Christmas memes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know liberals say it isn't happening, but there is a faction of the left that hates everything traditional in American life. This is how you get claims such as "the nuclear family is a an American conservative invention", despite the fact that every society has families like this.

    Alternatively, there are some people who just want to put up a tree with ornaments while there are far more religious people who want Christmas to be specifically about Jesus (they would in fact complain about materialism taking over the holiday). The first group is also getting crap from these anti-Christmas people even though they don't necessarily agree with the more religious types.

  28. Micro means ignore the whiny fools by judoguy · · Score: 1
    I have an older friend who was a refugee in WWII. She was staffed by the Luftwaffe at one point and had to flee the Soviets later on. When she came to the U.S. after the war, one of the jobs she had was dealing with jerks on the phone in an office in NY city.

    Someone asked her how she could stay so calm on the job. She told them that the assholes on the phone were NOTHING, she had been attacked by professionals.

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    1. Re:Micro means ignore the whiny fools by Falos · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, if someone is really really RUDE the phone's tiny audio speaker could explode catastrophically.

      In fact, I'm pretty sure these pixels on my screen are about to toilet paper my house. I wish I could just turn it off or change to another tab.

  29. As The Smiths said... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    There are far more "news" articles about "news" articles about people getting their panties in a twist over a Christmas cup than there are "news" articles about people getting their panties in a twist over a Christmas cup.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  30. It's social networks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's social networks not social media.

    Don't let the outdated commercial broadcast radio and television corporations who coined "social media" feel relevant.

    That Hollywood movie was called The Social Network not The Social Media.

  31. microcomplaints? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come what may social media like facebook , twitter and others are here to stay.
    Complaints will always pop up , but lets look at the big picture. Its benefits are ennormous.