Slashdot Mirror


Value of University Degree Continues To Decline (www.cbc.ca)

BarbaraHudson writes: Following up from an earlier report from Statistics Canada (pdf), the Parliamentary Budget Officer warns that an increasing number of university graduates are overqualified for their jobs. The CBC reports: "Last year, 40 per cent of university graduates aged 25-34 were overqualified for their job. Five years ago, that percentage was only 36 per cent. In 1991, it hit a low of 32 per cent, or less than one out of every three university graduates. The problem is bigger than that, because those young workers spent money, time, and resources to get those qualifications.

19 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Why Not Vocational? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Everyone" says you'll go nowhere without a college degree. But guess what? This is neither what many kids want nor society needs.

    Vocational schools need to amp up the sales pitch. Machinists of the Tools and Die variety make 40$ and 50$ an hour, and that ain't bad.

    Some people just are not interested in the 4 year menu.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  2. Back in the old days by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    University graduates were rare. There were far fewer universities and university places. Thus the intrinsic value of having a degree was higher, all other things being equal. And the difference in education between someone who had finished university and someone who had not was readily apparent. Nowadays the lines have become blurred. The sheer volume of graduates means that you are competing against many people who have exactly the same educational qualifications as you, whereas before it was a distinct advantage.

    A degree is no longer a guarantee of a decent job in your field. In fact nowadays a Bachelor's is almost a minimum requirement for many jobs. On the other hand, NOT having a degree can be a disadvantage. It's up to the individual to weigh themselves carefully and judge whether the time and effort and debt required to receive higher education are worth it. A brilliant person will shine through even when covered in mud, and you can polish a turd as much as you want but it will remain a turd. So are you brilliant, or a turd? This should influence your decision.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re: Back in the old days by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Universities have been dumbed down

      This I fully agree with. I've seen graduates who can't do basic arithmetic without a calculator much less the ability to apply their knowledge to a situation they have not specifically encountered before. I think it's because students are taught to pass tests instead of taught actual practical and applied knowledge.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  3. Then why all the Temporary foreign workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If so many people are overqualified, then why all the complaints about not being able to find qualified workers and why all the foreign workers in both Canada and the US.

    It couldn't be because of the crappy wages being offered, could it?

    1. Re:Then why all the Temporary foreign workers? by Kellamity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because university graduates need on the job training, but an imported worker comes to you custom picked for their experience? Why train a grad to be your next SAP developer when you can get one from India who already knows how to do it?

  4. This by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the context of the article, it seems to me "overqualified" means - you bought an education which you cannot use / do not need for your work.

    E.g. having a university degree is "overqualified" for a barista job. Sadly, there are many (usually non STEM) degrees for which there is literally zero demand by employers. Where are the counselors on the front end of the university acceptance process? Hmm, seems like they just take students for the good of the school, not the needs of the student, or society.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:This by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      E.g. having a university degree is "overqualified" for a barista job.

      Well, part of the problem is the economy has been changing.

      Employment trends have been losing full-time jobs, and people have been moving to more and more part time jobs.

      Because companies are downsizing and offshoring, and generally not hiring people with skills any more.

      Essentially since 2008, economies have been cannibalizing themselves, and more and more jobs are getting crappier and crappier.

      So, ask yourself why those people are working as baristas ... the answer is MBAs and CEOs have been carving the jobs out of the economy to turn it into "shareholder value" and "cost savings".

      This has nothing to do with university acceptance policies, and everything to do with globalization gutting jobs and leaving very little skilled work domestically. Because we've been following the idiotic policies of cutting corporate taxes in the hopes they'll create jobs, and not tying to cuts to actually driving the economy instead of gutting it.

      And the jobs which do exist are being driven down in value to 'temporary foreign workers'. We've given corporations everything they want, and in return they've fucked all of us.

      Welcome to the New Fucking World Order, bitches. It's all downhill from here.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:This by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the context of the article, it seems to me "overqualified" means - you bought an education which you cannot use / do not need for your work.

      Or, it can mean that the only jobs available for most college grads are shitty jobs.

      How in the world do you use the percentage of students who are overqualified for their first job as a measure of the value of an education instead of as a critique of the corporate workplace?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:This by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many of these degrees look like they will lead to a job? To be sure there are many, that are good degrees, and if it weren't considered a microagression to point it out, most sane people can also point out those degrees that one should probably not go into debt to acquire. Or certainly not complain about it if that is one's choice.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    4. Re:This by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are more journalism graduates per year than there are journalism jobs in the totality of the profession.

      But journalists have skills that can be used in other areas, such as HR (interviews); research, such as marketing or competitive research; and business writing. Just because you don't get your target profession doesn't mean you can't use any of your major.

    5. Re:This by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I actually had a company do a background check on my high school diploma. It was easy enough to provide them with details on the school, thanks to the internet. The school records (paper only, of course) had long been lost. The company hired me anyhow, as apparently that was an OK outcome, but it was still an odd thing to check. (In Cali, you can get a copy of any background check results if you find the right box to check - it's fascinating.)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  5. Instant Gratification Error On Line 3487 by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen multiple studies showing that in the longer run a degree more than pays for itself on average, even liberal arts.

    This seems like a contradiction to TFA. One possible theory to reconcile this is that it takes time to find or become ready for positions that use education.

    The idea that you'll be doing more than just grunt work out of college is perhaps unrealistic. Employers want educated AND experienced employees. It takes a while to get sufficient experience.

    Even if you start in grunt work, learn what you can around you, pick up tidbits, listen and learn in meetings, go out of your way to do extra, read the policy & procedure manuals, practice your people skills, understand how your little corner of the work-load affects the rest of the org. Clues are all over the place. Education doesn't end out of college.

  6. The value isn't declining by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the job market is. Outsourcing + H1-Bs (insourcing? idk...) means it's hard to get a job in your field and you settle for something that pays less. This is what happens when countries swing so far right they stop protecting their working class.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  7. Cause meet effect, effect say hello to cause by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The U.S. is arguably the most capitalistic and market oriented country on the face of the earth yet amazingly we manage to produce vast swaths of the electorate that somehow think economy is some strange kind of magic run by dragons and fairies.

    What did anyone think would happen if we produced more degrees without insuring there would be demand for them ?

    On the one hand you had simple supply and demand hitting the prices http://www.wsj.com/articles/co...

    Simplified tuition aid was mostly a handout to universities not students.

    Then you have depressed pricing for the labor of people who earned a degree.

  8. Re:Reading between the lines here... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No.

    Overqualified typically means ones technical training and qualifications would rightfully be deserving of higher pay than the employer wants to spend.

  9. Blame H1-B's? by kheldan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe if asshole business people weren't importing cheap labor from overseas and hiring our own citizens for a living wage, we wouldn't have this problem. Subsequently we also wouldn't have the problem down the road of 'not having qualified applicants', which is their lame-ass excuse for importing cheap-ass labor from overseas on H1-B's in the first place! MEMO TO CORPORATE AMERICA: Stop shitting on our citizens!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  10. Re:It's the work experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stop complaining that the kids don't have business experience. They have an education. It's up to employers to give them business experience. You are what is wrong with corporate America/Canada

  11. Not really accurate by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real issue is that so many kids today take degrees that society does not need. How many journalists, philosophers, artists, any business item esp MBA, Law, etc does a society need? Basically, too many ppl are pursuing easy degrees. What is needed are things like engineering, nursing, medicine, computer science, etc.

    And yes, at the same time, we need to add more to vocational. So does Canada.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Up the ante, another round of certifications! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The value of college degrees decline because we hand them out for free today. Everyone's a winner, hooray! And because precious snowflake MUST have a degree, we can't simply accept that anyone could simply be too stupid to warrant getting one. So degrees get dumbed down to the point where they become utterly pointless. When everyone has a lump of gold, gold is worthless.

    Governments all over the globe have been pushing for more academics. We need more people with a degree! University degrees used to be something the upper 10% (if that) of people had. That's not enough, we need AT LEAST 25%! And lo and behold, we got them. Did we suddenly get so much smarter that more than twice the people could get one? Or is it more likely that it was dumbed down until a quarter of the population is good enough?

    This of course affects the job market. Because we sure don't get more jobs to fill. The requirements for jobs went up in turn. Suddenly every job needs you to have a college degree, even if it's at best ridiculous to require one. But we can get a college educated person for the same price as someone without, so why not require it?

    In turn, jobs that used to require college education now demand additional relevant certification. Which makes sense for top level positions and positions where a certain experience and additional training is a given, but we're talking entry level positions here. And no later than that we're getting to where your wallet becomes more a factor than your skill. Because in some fields the relevant certs cost money on par with another year of college. Or, depending on your country, even more.

    Of course that devalues university degrees.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.