Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Battlefront Released (giantbomb.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Yesterday marked the release of Star Wars Battlefront, EA DICE's attempt to resurrect a Star Wars video game series that had great success a decade ago, but gradually petered out over the course of several years. Early reviews for the game are mixed. Games Radar's video review gives it a lot of credit for being incredibly faithful to the feeling of Star Wars. Polygon's review praises the game's accessibility and its broad variety of PvP options, but acknowledges that it had to trade complexity to get there. Giant Bomb's review is much more blunt: "Slick production values, solid controls, and tons of fan service can't make up for mediocre progression and a lack of content." Many reviews rate the graphics highly, and performance is solid even on consoles. It's worth noting that user ratings on Metacritic come in significantly lower than critics' ratings, with the most common complaint being about the dearth of content.

31 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> user ratings on Metacritic come in significantly lower than critics' ratings...lack of content

    And yet, someone will still buy this shiny plastic turd of a game.

    The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired of Star Wars. I'm half hoping JJ will "Star Trek" the franchise, deep-sixing it in a way not even Jar-Jar or the racist "trade federation Asians" could do, and clear off some shelf space and mindshare for something new and creative.

    1. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lacking robust content doesn't make it a turd; it just falls shy of my expectations of a $60 game. I purchased it despite knowing it had limited content because it serves as a nice change of pace from the other game I'm playing right now. Plus, the lack of gore makes it a nice shooter that I can play with my 12 and 8 year old niece and nephew.

      Without some nice, free content, I doubt I'll still be playing it in three months. But I can say that about a lot of games I own.

    2. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by StrangeBrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll wait 2-3 years, pick it up for $20 on Steam, including all DLC, and be pleased with the entertainment I get for the price-point. The last time I payed full price for a game based on expectations was Diablo 3, and that taught me a valuable lesson.

    3. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting concept of "deep sixing" you have there, if you consider that his first Star Trek film was the first ST film to win an Academy Award, as well as winning numerous other awards, was financially successful and received very positive reviews. His second Star Trek film was even more financially successful than his first, received very favourable reviews and has been the spring board for the first Star Trek TV series in over a decade.

      I only hope the new Star Wars films fail as badly!

    4. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No you won't.

      First- this is EA, and they will keep pushing Origin. If you play this on PC, you need to have Origin installed. If you play it on consoles, you need to have an Origin account (the game walks you through this, of course). This means they won't launch it on Steam unless their whole model falls apart.

      Second- this game has almost no solo pve content- that is, the entire game is player versus player, with the exceptions of a few training missions. The training missions are actually pretty rad, but there's only a few of them. This means that if you try to play it in three years, your opponents will be both RARE and SUPER GOOD at the game- you'll be playing with and against the people who have, for whatever reason, decided that THIS game is the one that will stand the test of time for them, despite a bunch of new and shiny options, so they will love the mechanics, the guns, the powerups, the maps- and you'll be a babe amongst wolves.

      For what it does, it's an excellent game- a pvp fps with extra options and strong Star Wars theme. If that doesn't motivate you to buy it within the first year of launch, you'll likely be much better served by other entertainment options for your dollar- and your time.

    5. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you play this on PC, you need to have Origin installed. If you play it on consoles, you need to have an Origin account

      And this is why I will stick with my old XBox 360 with no network connection.

      I have no interest in having to be online, or have a bloody account to play a video game.

      I miss old school gaming without the network. And when my 360 dies, then I guess I'm done with gaming for good.

      I don't want to play against some kid who has put 10000 hours into a game. I don't want ads in my games. I don't want to have to sign up for a damned account, and fork over my credit card or any other personal information.

      For some of us, video games are intermittent undertakings, and don't involve networking or people who aren't in the same room.

      Have we completely lost the old school concept of console gaming as a standalone thing? Because that's all I really want.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      It won because it was a good movie, not because it was a good Star Trek movie.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    7. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're not nostalgic for the bygone days of gaming -- you're nostalgic for life before 1993.

      In some ways, yes ... the longer the internet is around and becomes attached to everything, the less I want it to be attached to everything.

      Because the internet is largely now taken over by marketing assholes and analytics.

      I want a fucking video game, not yet another vector to have these clowns track everything I do.

      For the same reasons I don't want my TV or my toilet connected to the internet -- because it's pointless and doesn't offer me any added value.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Same as Battlefield 4. $60 buys you what amounts to a trial version, with the right to beta-test a couple of levels, and paying extra for the DLC that completes the game. The Ultimate Edition gets you the complete game with 4 expansion packs for $120. Consider that the real price.

      I'm not against DLC or against releasing a game early with only a few levels, as it gives me a chance to see if I like the game without paying full price. But at $60 I feel like I'm already paying full price for a fulll game. This seems like a tactic to jack up the price.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Movies need to be fun. Leave the preaching to Sunday mass.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by orgelspieler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Leave it to Disney to take a franchise and license it for everything from toothpaste to cell phone ads. They really know how to whore out a movie. Long gone are the days when the worst you would see was a Happy Meal and some action figures. At least the Lego sets are still awesome.

    11. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > And this is why I will stick with my old XBox 360 with no network connection.
      > I have no interest in having to be online, or have a bloody account to play a video game.

      Let me be blunt: this game is a multiplayer online shooter and almost nothing else. If you have "no interest in being online", then the dual-classed bloatware/spyware Origin is NOT why you aren't buying the game.

      You aren't buying the game because you aren't the market, full stop.

      It is absolutely impossible to play a 40+ man pvp game from your living room without a network connection. You are avoiding it because it's not your genre of game- the fact that Origin sucks doesn't even begin to enter the equation for you.

    12. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by lgw · · Score: 2

      Don't give up on gaming, just give up on EA, and perhaps on consoles. Good Old Games is waiting for you: everything guaranteed DRM-free, and many classic PC games there (plus a world of shitty games, of course).

      I'm perfectly happy with Steam, but I do wish Origin would die in a fire: there are several EA games I'd like to play, but just won't if Origin is there.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by lgw · · Score: 2

      Abrams ST films were garbage, because he made them as if they were SW films (he says as much in the DVD commentary). Much as I hate what he did to the ST franchise, it doesn't in any way suggest he'll make a bad SW movie. Basically everything that sucked in Trek will work great in Wars.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      It sounds like it's time for you to throw in the towel. If you can't be bothered to download an update, why even own a console?

      This is a joke, right? Please tell me this is a joke.

    15. Re:The movie's not out yet and I'm already tired by cfalcon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Every EA game is Origin now- it's fair to hate Origin, but it means you hate EA. Which is also fair.

  2. Even though I got preview night tickets... by CaptnCrud · · Score: 2

    I have a feeling everyone is going to be starwars'ed out by new years. Disney needs to earn that 4 BILLION back.

    It will be a very star wars christmas, It also should be noted that they own more than half of the radio and tv broadcast stations.....sometimes I really do feel like I live in the movie "They Live" with Obey, Conform, Consume messages everywhere.

    ....well, hopefully this one turns out better than the first prequel did.

    1. Re:Even though I got preview night tickets... by Zephyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      It will be a very star wars Holiday Special

      FTFY

    2. Re:Even though I got preview night tickets... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Disney needs to earn that 4 BILLION back.

      To put it in perspective, Blizzard paid $5.9bn for King, the developer of Candy Crush Saga and many other mobile pay-to-advance games.

      Must be kind of annoying for the developers of games like this, and the people working on the movies. They put in all that effort and a shitty mobile game cloning factory that specializes in extracting your money through boredom and your nagging kids is worth more than all their efforts combined.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Even though I got preview night tickets... by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 2

      Just a minor correction: Activision Blizzard bought King. Blizzard make very few games and is not afraid to cancel a game that doesn't live up to their standards while Activision pumps out sequel after sequel and does its best to capitalize on whatever is popular at the moment. I'm not saying Blizzard is infallible, but the decision to overspend on King strikes me as more of an Activision decision.

    4. Re:Even though I got preview night tickets... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2

      You know they don't have to make that 4B back this christmas, right?

      I mean, they'd like to, sure, but Disney knows how to play the long game.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Even though I got preview night tickets... by towermac · · Score: 2

      What's left of Blizzard, if anything, hides deep in the bowels of the building, retaining the authority to decide between 92,500 and 92,750 damage for an attack.

      I can't imagine much more than that can possibly be left. If there is, it certainly doesn't show in WoW.

  3. Not touching this one by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a multiplayer only game (ok, ok, you can play against bots, but that doesn't count), selling for a price that is, if anything, slightly higher than the average, where the developers have been quite open to quickly divide the community between those who are willing to pay an extra large sum on top of that for the DLC/season pass, and those peasants who just want to pay for the basic game.

    In a game with a proper single-player campaign and a season pass for multiplayer content (eg. Tomb Raider, Call of Duty), I can happily ignore the season pass. In a game with a proper single-player campaign and a season pass for single-player content (eg. Fallout 4, The Witcher 3), I can make a situational call on whether to pay extra for the additional content, knowing that the original game isn't diluted if I don't want to splash out. But in a multiplayer-only game, I know that if I don't spend extra for the season pass (or buy each piece of DLC piecemeal), I'm going to get rapidly shunted into an online ghetto.

    Battlefront's season pass is a particularly expensive one.

    The game is pretty but looks like a rip-off. The better reviews have all highlighted that while fun for a short period of time, there is little depth to the gameplay and it gets old very fast. There have been a huge number of quality releases in the last few weeks that I have barely scratched the surface of (StarCraft 2: Legacy of the Void, Rise of the Tomb Raider, Disgaea 5, the expansions for Witcher 3 and Bloodborne and, flawed though it is, Fallout 4). On that basis, I am happy to pass up this particular rip-off.

    1. Re:Not touching this one by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Rainbow 6 due to release soon utterly kicks the crap out of this. I also beta tested that and it requires tactics and thought. No bunny hopping and blasting away randomly like this star wars battlefront is like.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Not touching this one by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I just don't play these types of games any more. There is no point, 5 years down the road there will be no more servers and the game will be unplayable.

      I loved BF2142 but can no longer play it for this reason.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  4. If it was from any other publisher... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm absolutely SHOCKED that EA would deliver a game that is marketed towards a fan base that will purchase absolutely anything with the franchise logo on it, and then skimp on content so that they can then double / triple / quadruple dip into that fan's wallet behind the disgusting practice of paid-for-DLC.

    Won't even take a look at this thing with EA's logo on it. I'll continue playing games from publishers that don't have a Bill Cosby-esque relationship with their customers.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:If it was from any other publisher... by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      That's why I stopped playing Battlefield games. I was tired of having to buy a new version and upgrade my graphics card to support it every 2 years. Plus when they started tracking you online and giving you upgrades with huge advantages over new players, it became obvious if you didn't buy it when you came out, you'd never enjoy it.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  5. Re:Too little content? by Zephyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pray they don't alter the deal any further.

  6. Re: A Really Good Star Wars Game by captjc · · Score: 2

    I believe that was the Naboo Genocide level on Battlefront 2. I believe there was also one for Ewoks and Jawas as well.

    That really was a sweet game made for the fans. Just too bad for the crappy ship battles.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  7. Starwars: BattleNot Fallout 4 by netsavior · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would normally look forward to a bunch of the games coming out, such as:
    Starwars: BattleNot Fallout 4
    Starcraft Legacy of the Not Fallout 4
    Halo 5: Guardians of the Not Fallout 4
    Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Not Fallout 4
    Rise of the Tomb Not Fallout 4 Raider

    But all of these top games seem to have one thing in common.

  8. I wish I were 12 by coldsalmon · · Score: 2

    ... because then I would think this was so rad. Seriously, if my 12-year-old self had this game, he would have been in heaven. All I got back then was Rebel Assault, which blew my mind at the time because it came on a goddamn CD-ROM. Sadly, my older self does not share this enthusiasm. But to all you 12-year-olds out there, have a ball driving around in AT-STs.