Slashdot Mirror
Greenwald: Why the CIA Is Smearing Edward Snowden After Paris Attacks (latimes.com)
JoeyRox points out that Glenn Greenwald has some harsh words for the CIA in an op-ed piece for the LA Times. From the article: "Decent people see tragedy and barbarism when viewing a terrorism attack. American politicians and intelligence officials see something else: opportunity. Bodies were still lying in the streets of Paris when CIA operatives began exploiting the resulting fear and anger to advance long-standing political agendas. They and their congressional allies instantly attempted to heap blame for the atrocity not on Islamic State but on several preexisting adversaries: Internet encryption, Silicon Valley's privacy policies and Edward Snowden."
How are they smearing him, again? He's a traitor by any definition. He's lucky to not be executed.
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
Rahm Emanuel
Aren't politics grand? Gotta further an agenda while the corpses are still warm. (You lose impact any other way, you see.) /s
When Russia told the US about the Boston Marathon bombers?
When a flight instructor told the US about people who wanted to fly planes, but not land them before 9/11?
We have replaced credible human intelligence with signals intelligence. Making the hay stack bigger only makes the needles harder to find.
Some people are too lazy to know right from wrong, so they let the state dictate morality for them. These people are going to hell.
By any objective standard, Snowden has been right on all accounts and the Empire has nothing to say except "TRAITOR!"
>80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
>life
The level of manipulation of Big Media in the United States is shocking and should alarm anyone. The "news" was filled with stories about how there's now suddenly a big debate about encryption and how Silicon Valley is in the hot seat. Really?!? Completely manufactured bullshit brought to you by the oligarchy which very tightly controls Big Media, controls what the agenda is (and is not), and works overtime to manipulate the public to further its agenda of greed.
Thank God Glen Greenwald pointed this out. I guess that's one thing I'm truly thankful for on this day!
At the moment they are fighting propaganda, they will go on and on commenting as hundreds of users per real person and impersonating situational personalities in public spaces to push their agenda. They are fighting against people who just don't care, they are just trying to be truthful in subjects which others have had bad histories with.
No matter what, they will keep on and they can't be beat in their fight. Eventually however people will realize that they are just trying to save their sanity because they came from a world with a very small possibility of global or even communal communication.
It's a generational (perhaps multiple-generation) schism.
It has nothing do with encryption so you call all drop the comments about "But the Paris attackers didn't use encryption!" Totally irrelevant.
There is a book on the subject that details how Snowden negatively impacted US intelligence. You can believe he's a hero if you want, but it doesn't mean that his actions had no effect: The Snowden Operation: Inside the West's Greatest Intelligence Disaster
multicore. snowden is a java multicore ai.
Snowpup does an excellent job of smearing himself. It'll be a good day when he's finally apprehended and brought to justice.
The organizations they started are still full of closeted queers who get off on spying on innocent people.
Because the CIA is fucking evil. Next question?
Seriously, the CIA is responsible for the creation of Al Qaeda as a threat to America, you're welcome for 9/11. Then the CIA was responsible for torturing people and provoking new terrorist recruitment, running the drone killing campaign which spawns ten terrorists for every one it kills, and now we have ISIS which is a result of W. Bush's stupid illegal invasion of Iraq, which HIS OWN FATHER warned him would happen. But Bush and the CIA people annoyed his father didn't do it went ahead anyway, and look where we are now.
That he hurry the Intel community isn't the point either. He showed them to be lying to Congress and operating illegally.
but they've used it up.
Snowden's prospects are not good. He can surrender to the US, face American justice, and be hanged proper. Or he can hang around in Moscow until Putin gives him a Polonium cocktail.
an ill wind that blows no good
Just like Liberals use school shootings to push gun grabbing laws and work to repeal the 2nd amendment. Nothing different here at all. Hell, even Obama went on TV before the bodies were cold in Oregon and disgustingly spoke of politics to push his and the rest of the Democrats agenda of gun grabbing. They do this all the time, fear mongering liberals. They even use those horrible incidents to attack the NRA, comparing them to "terrorists" in a grotesque and shallow display of arrogance and ignorance. There is NO DIFFERENCE in what they're doing. It's horrible and they should be held accountable for it, not put on a throne and praised by the ignorant and easily manipulated.
...including "Silicon Valley's privacy policies" in the list of pet peeves for the CIA/NSA. In fact, Silicon Valley IT giants have a steady stream of revenue from providing services to assist the NSA in their private personal data trawling. It's just business. The public rhetoric is simply PR and marketing to keep their share prices up. None of the IT giants are proposing anything that would actually prevent the NSA from bulk data collection and accessing their data warehouses, security certificates, and encryption keys. The greatest facilitators in the most intrusive and pervasive surveillance programme in history are the IT giants themselves. Let's not forget that.
You are a good example for this study:
http://now.uiowa.edu/2015/11/s...
The cited paper is behind a fucking paywall.
Sadly the CIA is right wing as is the military, industrial complex. The one thing we know about the right wing is that they lie and lie and lie. For the CIA job security and advancement, all are related to seeing supposed, great threats to the US. If no threat exists they will create one. Further, wars make some people a lot of money when there are active conflicts,
Eric is a narcissistic self delusional traitor. How much information did he leak that had nothing to do with domestic surveillance? The journalist that support him are angry that everyone has moved on and their message is no longer getting my any airtime.
I honestly can't believe any of you have fallen for this.
GG signed a movie deal with Sony, partner with the NSA, after the "leaks" were out.
By the way, where are the leaks? Cryptome has been keeping track, and on any scale, he hasn't "leaked" more than 1% of what snowden gave him.
What's the point? This detracts from their own goals of safety for USA. And they live there. So wtf? What is the ends here?
There is a huge difference. You want a clandestine three letter agency to monitor all communications and take out people who would do a Paris style attack. By take out I mean of coarse kill without any law or court system 'authorizing' the killing. What you do not want is LE having access to the same tools and technologies. LE and the whole injustice system makes Big Big money throwing people in jail. They will use the technology to 'create' a case against you and send your ass to jail. A good prosecutor does not need you to be guilty in order to construct a good case against you. Everyone worries about GITMO. Sure there are some innocent people in Gitmo, but there are 1000x more innocent USAian citizens locked in USAian prison because the prosecutor get paid to get convictions and ignore evidence that points to innocence. Snowden was a traitor pure and simple. I am for one proud of the job the NSA does. Now Snowden is hiding out in Russia. Is Russia the bastion of egalitarianism and democracy that Snowden wants? I know Putin and his Russian buddies spy just as much as the NSA ever did, and I do not have any problem with this. Spying is what governments do. What is inexplicable is how Snowden (aka #1 traitor) gets a free ride and dishonestly believes that by betraying his countries spy network and defecting to another country with a spy network every bit as advanced as the USAian one, he is some kind of hero in the minds of the USAian public.
Fuck Snowden.
Fuck Russia! Fuck China!
Long Live Freedom
The comments on the article make for depressing reading. People seem to have swallowed the horror stories about encryption hook, line and sinker.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
I think Sam Harris has put it best:
"Greenwald doesn't have a journalist bone in his body."
Obama has major penis envy about Snowden.
Obama will send to the death 1,000,000 federal employees just to kill Snowden. And then not kill Snowden.
Big O just does not have the brain power, money, or armaments to kill Snowden!
Ha ha THBBFT.
From a previously posted comment: Articles about Microsoft spying:
Microsoft's Software is Malware. "Malware means software designed to function in ways that mistreat or harm the user." -- Gnu.org
How Can Any Company Ever Trust Microsoft Again? -- Computerworld UK
Microsoft handed the NSA access to encrypted messages -- The Guardian
Snowden is a criminal. His crime is that of outsmarting the US shadow govt., something they will never forgive him for. You may stop this hero but you can't stop us all. After all ... were all alike.
I might be getting old and grumpy, or it may be the effect of a sixpack or two, or it might be my NoScript allowing Slashdot only, but I came here to whine about "News for nerds, stuff that matters" asking myself why the filesystem-check does this matter for nerds.
To make a good whiney comment, with citations and all, I looked for the slogan on the front page, but... colour [I learned English from a Brit, sue me, Arbeit macht mich frei] me surprised!
At first I didn't see the connection with using a terrorist attack to push political agendas to whichever side. At second, I didn't see the connection of that attack with news for freaking "nerds". At last, I didn't see the mention of nerds anymore.
Should I walk to the east and board an Elven ship to Valinor, for my time has passed?
Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Well said
Wow. What a bunch of crap this site is pushing down the throats of the dumb and young.
Because smearing is easier than doing proper counterintelligence? WMD... anyone?... anyone?...
The CIA's former acting director, Michael Morell... Former CIA chief James Woolsey...
These people are not from the CIA anymore, they have no right to talk on the behalf of the CIA and what they say are personal opinions, nothing more.
My mentat computer has come out with conclusive results. It's not tomorrow. Don't get me wrong; something evil happens tomorrow. There will come a day, growing sooner now, when there will be a flash, brighter than the sun, brighter than anything you've ever seen. Tomorrow will be its opening ritual.
/. and other sources reported conclusively that the terrorists used simple unencrypted sms messaging to communicate/arrange their attack. But local media (in Canada that's CTV), still yelped that it was the 'encrypted' Playstation4 that was the handmaiden of the terrorists. And I heard the yelps about Edward Snowden too. And I thought "What the hell? That's a heck of a stretch!" And they repeated it and repeated it until the media started following their lead. And in my head the propaganda alarm went off. And they could have used 1000 other kinds of communication to coordinate. They could have used steganography on any of them and blabbed in the clear and the 5 eyes and the French DGSE, DGSI, and even the BGRE would not be able to pick it apart. And right now someone reading my post is shitting and saying "don't say steganagraphy!" And the security theater goes on. It includes the act that pushes "security by obscurity". But alas, university taught me that "Security by Obscurity is a Fallacy"(tm). But the fiction the 3 and 4 letter agencies like to push (the political show), doesn't like that reality to be told.
Unlimited power from the sun
Do you support Edward Snowden? Then you can't possibly support Anonymous then right? In your mind the U.S. government is too secretive and unaccountable? Anonymous is more secretive and far less accountable.
Nice to see someone unafraid to speak the truth, especially someone involved with the media.
Too bad he'll die in a tragic accident very soon and/or be completely discredited and/or found guilty of being in posession of child porn or illegal drugs or other contraband, and everything he had to say denied as false.
Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
Is that cold fjord by any other name?
So you think that dangerous and criminal enemies of the constitution should not be hurt at all but protected from the results of their despicable acts? Is that what you are saying?
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
For someone that aided and abetted a traitorous criminal, I'm not sure that Greenwald can explain this one away. They have yet to answer how intelligence agencies are supposed to work when they're supposed to give notice at the worst of times.
Events like Paris are enabled and amplified by the Snowden-caused damage caused to intelligence collecting agencies.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
I offer you an XOR deal. If you want us to prosecute Snowden, we'll also put YOU on trial. If you want amnesty from your gross misconduct, then Snowden must be included.
Uh what? They intelligence agencies are supposed to give notice only when times are good?
The pro-surveillance trolls make so little sense these days that it's no wonder the agencies have to buy/extort all the major political parties. Because otherwise whichever remaining party would not regurgitate the same tripe would win the next election.
"dangerous and criminal enemies of the constitution"? Wouldn't that be the CIA and NSA? They clearly are dangerous, they commit a lot of felonies (including perjury before congress, purportedly supposed to control the services, and sabotaging the computers used by the committees supposed to look at their work), and they have a very dim view of the Bill of Rights.
I noticed the instant anti-encryption spin as well. It was all over TV and in the NY Times as well, with virtually no opposing viewpoints expressed. And it happened so fast that you have to wonder if the FBI had a set of speeches ready to roll out at the next occurrence of a terror attack. It's especially embarrassing for these guys given the fact that it appears that the terrorists used SMS, and that metadata indicating who was communicating with whom was all available and the intelligence agencies still didn't manage to stop the attack. My suspicion is that the intelligence agencies collect lots of data but have no way of sieving through it to find actual useful information.
I read the summary of the book, and pretty much, it says that Snowden hurt the western alliance because it showed how the US was spying on its allies. That's like saying BLM activists are hurting race relations in the US by showing how often police actually murder black people who are doing nothing wrong. You're blaming the wrong actor. IOW, perhaps if we weren't spying on Angela Merkel, she wouldn't be pissed that we were spying on her. Only morons believe that secrets will stay secret forever.
To claim he's lucky to not be executed and to smear on such a hero is clearly an act of terrorism. CIA, please all move to Guantanamo, don't take any money, you are a threat to the USA!
The "surveilance is evil" guys need to propose an alternative way for intelligence agencies to work.
As an example, there are about 1 million Syrian refugees in Europe.
About 13% of them are positive about ISIS.
http://www.clarionproject.org/...
Tell me, pretty please, how you are supposed to monitor 130'000 men.
Except the terrorists were not using secure communication at all, and no encryption whatsoever. What a blunder on the part of these anti-encryption idiots.
I saw that even Hillary Clinton went in on attacking encryption without even knowing the truth of the situation.
Both Democrats and Republicans are headed by idiots.
Except of course that everything you've written is horseshit. Paris was specifically not enabled by the terrorists' knowledge of encryption, because it has become perfectly clear that they didn't bother using it.
When the security services can manage to prevent all the attacks that they should be able to prevent simply by looking at the unencrypted traffic, then we'll talk about whether they need more help to break encryption. And the answer will still be no, because the damage that would result from government-mandated backdoors being discovered and used by criminals would be orders of magnitude worse than the damage that would result from the occasional terrorist attack. Hell, some of the criminals exploiting such backdoors would _be_ the terrorists, using the backdoors to steal money to fund their operations.
Maybe you've been living in a cave the past year or so but it has been the intelligence and law enforcement community screaming like Chicken Little about the dangers of encryption. In fact, immediately after the Paris attacks, the same people were claiming that a PS4 enabled the terrorists to communicate securely to plan the Paris attacks. That turned out to be a complete lie generated by law enforcement to gain sympathy for their "ban encryption" efforts.
For good measure, they also claimed that Snowden's disclosures have made terrorists start using encryption and that Snowden had blood on his hands in Paris. This is ignoring the fact that terrorists have been well-aware of the US' ability to eavesdrop on communications and have been heavily using encryption or non-electronic means of communicating prior to Snowden.
On the topic of Snowden, nobody in the intelligence community has been able to articulate exactly what damage Snowden's disclosures have done in terms of hunting terrorists or legitimate intel sources. That's a pretty strong indicator that all of you armchair quarterbacks, including the one who authored your book, are full of shit.
There is a book on the subject that details how Snowden negatively impacted US intelligence.
He certainly "negatively impacted" US intelligence, though it's a lot like how a police officer "negatively impacted" the criminal he just arrested. The US intelligence agencies did all the harm to themselves, and when you were made aware of their criminal activities, you chose to blame the messenger and the not the criminals.
Fanatically anti-fanatical
Heck, they learned this from the gun grabbers who jump on every shooting and demand more laws, when by golly, the existing laws, if enforced, would do. (see for example, Fast and Furious, laws for gun-free zones, laws against murder no matter how you do it, and so on forever, already existing) Never let a crisis go to waste. Always consider the source...I think this behavior is ghoulish, personally. And when Ed Snowden "hurt" the TLAs, they have a lot of balls to say that hurt the USA - as if they alone were the USA - it helped the vast majority of actual citizens who, unlike them, do obey the laws of the land.
Why guess when you can know? Measure!
As long as you don't blow the whistle on the gub'ment.
"They never snitch on themselves, but they want you to snitch on YOU"
-Immortal Technique
No surprises here, it's a standard ploy to impress the herd. Example:
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/18/brady-campaign-labels-nra-terrorists/
For those of you under 50 or so, 'terrorist' is the new 'communist'.
Gun grabbing liberals. I find their usage of the word liberal horrible. Voltaire must be rotating in his grave. Pun intended.
NRA are trying to argue against an enemy that excel in rhetorics and controls the education system. Good luck with that.
Start funding INDEPENDENT education and you may get somewhere.
Unfortunately, those effects have not been anywhare near enough. The tax-sponsored criminals are still doing evil things every day.
it stops dumb merkins asking why do we spend so much money on you spooks and your spying programs on us when you fail to stop major attacks unless it is all theatre?
You can rest assured that the CIA/NSA/FBI have targeted Greenwald/The Intercept with massive misinformation campaigns as well as just plain harassment. Don't read the comments, they're intended to depress & demotivate.
We can start by not letting it get that far.
I think of it all in terms of "insane asylum" rules and the "Lowest Common Denominator". Ideally you should keep the "asylum" population separate from the main population so that the rest of us can live normal lives. When those walls break down and those people flood the main population, the easy thing to do is apply the asylum rules to the main population. But the right thing to do is to keep that population under control, medicated, and/or separate from the main population.
Look at our schools. Where does zero-tolerance come from? It's the result of too many kids going to the regular public schools who should instead be in special mental facilities or alternative schools. If your kid is taking anti-depressants and is suicidal, they need to be somewhere else. If your kid is a thief or a gang member, they need to be somewhere else. The same thing is happening to us as adults. We have too many people among us who don't belong here, who want to kill us, or who are just plain crazy. They belong in a mental institution, their home country (in the case of illegal immigrants), or prison. When you have too many people like that in the main population, the rules shift to account for them, and "that's why we can't have nice things," like privacy.
When it comes to refugees from war torn areas like Syria, I think the threat is too great to accept them into the main population. It's worse than closing mental institutions. It's importing people directly from a country that fell to their own population of crazy people. We will fall as well, if we're not careful. Better to avoid the risk all together, and close up the borders (to all but the strictest form of immigration) until the world regains its sanity.
Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
---
"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015
How else programmatically update it?
"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015
Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.
---
"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015
Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes
"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...
---
"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)
60++ reputable sources say different:
64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
&
Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
---
"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015
Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.
---
"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015
Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007
http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...
See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.
APK
P.S.=>
"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015
Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me
... apk
I've read the book, a lot of whining and dull thinking.
Instead of accepting reality and working to improve their processes.
Where do you get this crap from, Fox? They are refugees because of Assad not ISIS. ISIS are bad, Assad is worse. Not helping them is an action of craven snivelling cowardice.
Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
How is it possible that the CIA and other intelligence agencies have been watching ISIS closely and were unable to capture non-encrypted communications from these terrorists? Since they didn't use encryption or other "evil" technology to hide what they were doing this should have been easy for the CIA and others to intercept communications and connect the dots that they are planning an attack in Paris. This is just another failure by the US intelligence community who could have connected the dots and warned French officials. In the Boston Marathon bombings they received warnings from Russian intelligence on one of the brothers and this brother even called his mom back home talking about attacking the USA but this didn't raise a single eyebrow in the US intelligence community. Snowden's revelations and encryption had nothing to do with this attack. This is an attempt by the US to use this tragedy to gain an upper hand in the war on encryption and pass legislation that they otherwise would be unable to do. Just like the Patriot Act and many other acts were passed right after the 9/11 attacks that again US intelligence failed to connect the dots even though intelligence sources warned that Al Qaeda planned some attack involving hijacked airliners and flight instructors expressed concern over students from the middle east taking flight lessons. If they connected the dots they could have stopped 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Bombings as well.
Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
---
"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015
How else programmatically update it?
"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015
Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.
---
"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015
Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes
"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...
---
"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)
60++ reputable sources say different:
64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
&
Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
---
"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015
Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.
---
"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015
Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007
http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...
See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.
APK
P.S.=>
"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015
Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me
... apk
Encryption or not, tying the hands of the intelligence services did some harm. The very things that are asked of intelligence services would only serve to help people avoid them.
For someone that aided and abetted a traitorous criminal, I'm not sure that Greenwald can explain this one away. They have yet to answer how intelligence agencies are supposed to work when they're supposed to give notice at the worst of times.
Events like Paris are enabled and amplified by the Snowden-caused damage caused to intelligence collecting agencies.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
---
"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015
How else programmatically update it?
"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015
Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.
---
"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015
Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes
"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...
---
"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)
60++ reputable sources say different:
64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
&
Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
---
"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015
Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.
---
"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015
Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007
http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...
See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.
APK
P.S.=>
"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015
Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me
... apk
I believe you mean they wipe their ass with the U.S. Constitution every time they take a shit.