Slashdot Mirror


Tech Giant SAP Seeks To Hire More Autistic Adults (cio.com)

itwbennett writes: In May 2013, SAP launched its Autism at Work program, with the goal of recruiting and hiring 'hundreds of people' with autism worldwide. Now the company is expanding the program, and is looking to have people on the autism spectrum make up 1 percent of its total workforce (~650 people) by 2020, says José Velasco, head of the Autism at Work program at SAP. So far, autistic workers fulfill all kinds of roles in IT — from software testing, data analysis, quality assurance to IT project management, graphic design, finance administration and human resources, Velasco says, and the potential for new roles is expanding rapidly.

165 comments

  1. I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're looking for peeps on the spectrum, you came to the right place.

    1. Re:I just added it to my resume. by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm... I expect no more unemployed people on Slashdot.

      That said, they're going to capitalize the ever living hell out of people's mental disorder and are trying to spin this as a positive thing? What's next? Hiring people in wheelchairs specifically so you can save money on office furniture? We want to save on the water bill, it's a green initiative, so we're hiring people with catheters!

      Hmm... I'm a cynical bastard today.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re: I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking same exact thing, from experience.

    3. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next? Hiring people in wheelchairs specifically so you can save money on office furniture? We want to save on the water bill, it's a green initiative, so we're hiring people with catheters!

      You make it sound as if it were a bad thing.

    4. Re:I just added it to my resume. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Tax breaks for employing people with a handicap?? People are altruistic, not corporations.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autism isn't a handicap, it's evolution neurotypicals are too simple to perceive.

    6. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like this idea one bit. "Hiring people with Autism" speaks of being oblivious to the needs of someone who is anywhere on the Autistic spectrum, and rather is just filling a "mentally disabled" quota... instead of a physically disabled one. A physically disabled "enabled" workplace requires things like office furniture and elevators for those in wheelchairs, braille everywhere for those that are blind, and ... well those who are deaf really actually require no changes. In fact those that are deaf aren't distracted by co-workers who like to visit and chat, rather they make use of the text message/instant messaging features of the software and smartphones.

      One could make the argument than any damn nerd on the internet is a Autistic individual. All of 4chan/8chan would also qualify. And of course the defenders of Autism still want to draw a line between those that are down-syndrome class autistic and pretty much without a language center in their brain, and those who are just purposely being disgusting asshole-nerds who barely qualify as mentally deficient, just lacking social skills.

      The bar needs to be set at some place where a hiring quota is intended to pull people up, not keep people down. Like there are Autistic individuals that are basically entirely normal people save for the inability to vocalize more than the sound of a cow. Give them a means to communicate and they're as good as anyone else. Then there are those who will self-label themselves as aspergers, when they're really just assholes.

    7. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That said, they're going to capitalize the ever living hell out of people's mental disorder and are trying to spin this as a positive thing?"

      The more high-functioning autistic spectrum individuals should really be thought of as having a "personality types" instead of a "disorder". For the lower-functioning individuals, it is definitely a positive thing that they might have a chance at employment. They're usually stuck without any options.

    8. Re:I just added it to my resume. by azcoyote · · Score: 2

      If corporations are not altruistic, and people make up corporations, what makes you think that people are altruistic?

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    9. Re:I just added it to my resume. by malditaenvidia · · Score: 2

      Autism can be crippling, it's a wide spectrum of mental disorders and not every person suffering an autism-spectrum disorder is highly functional. I highly recommend Louis Theourx's documentary on the subject.

    10. Re:I just added it to my resume. by uncqual · · Score: 1

      well those who are deaf really actually require no changes

      Aren't the flashing strobes on fire alarms there to alert the totally deaf to a fire alarm? Adding those strobes was a 'change', albeit a small one.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    11. Re:I just added it to my resume. by neoritter · · Score: 1

      What if they gave their employees awesome new wheel chairs?

    12. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, it would be very hard to enjoy your work at SAP if you weren't somewhere on the spectrum.

    13. Re:I just added it to my resume. by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      which in turn endanger the epileptics (very slightly).

      Sometimes no changes will be made to help.

    14. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work for the Navy, and they are currently in the process of switching their entire financial system to a SAP ERP system (my command has been using it for about 2 years now). The Navy LOVES paying extra for services from companies that hire the disabled (my notepads say "made by blind people"). I can't help but think that someone did the math and found out after tax breaks and premiums on government contracts that it pays very well to hire the disabled. Hell, that's practically skillcrafts entire business model, the gov will pay far more for items made in the US by disabled people than a made in China item.

    15. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I've sometimes wondered about that tradeoff.

    16. Re:I just added it to my resume. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Autism isn't a handicap, it's evolution neurotypicals are too simple to perceive.

      Says the person who has never dealt with anyone with real autism.

      Note: self-diagnosing yourself as being "on the autistic spectrum" because you're anti-social and good at maths doesn't mean you have autism.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:I just added it to my resume. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I know two people on the autism spectrum pretty well. One is what they call high-functioning, can cope with society, is very intelligent, and I don't consider him to have a disability. The other is considerably more autistic (not near the end of the spectrum though) and is definitely disabled.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    18. Re:I just added it to my resume. by K10W · · Score: 1

      Autism isn't a handicap, it's evolution neurotypicals are too simple to perceive.

      Says the person who has never dealt with anyone with real autism.

      Note: self-diagnosing yourself as being "on the autistic spectrum" because you're anti-social and good at maths doesn't mean you have autism.

      yeah these kind of comments irk me since I've seen a few friends and family deeply affected by it. Fwiw I am diagnosed and have above tech skills plus much higher IQ than average, got through Hon degree in Biochem with zero revision and effort and so on going mostly on finding what most struggled with where fact recall doesn't help and needs actual understanding due to it being intuitive and could've figured it out myself even BUT these are nothing to do with my aspergers as was confirmed by several experts in the field. I still struggle with many things that some would class a disability, not just social stuff but certain lights, noise level etc. With high functioning AS, and other factors including my memory all thrown in those things compliment each other, they are not necessarily caused by each other.

      Now if I struggle with traits that cancel out the difficult and compliment the good those who have the opposite really have the odds set against them. ASD diagnosis is not to be confused with skillsets that when possessed by ASD type individuals lead to very specialist ability. Plenty on the spectrum have no such ability and plenty with those skills do NOT fall into diagnostic criteria. I have friends and family though who don't function the same. I have family who all excel and educated/work in engineering, sciences and maths but some within it are definitely what I'd call disabled and deeply affected and NOT gifted in any way. Technical stuff, logic problems etc all are totally unintuitive to them and often impossible. So yeah it can be debilitating.

      Also poor social skills and maths skills are not diagnostic criterion because they occur across the population including the neurotypical and often absent in even high functioning autistic types. So yeah it is safe to say you are a "self diagnosed" neurotypical person with poor social skills lookign for an excuse and understands little about the subject.

    19. Re:I just added it to my resume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They think they are going to nail the next RainMan Oh noes, no need to exploit some poor guys.

    20. Re:I just added it to my resume. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They are looking for people with useful abilities which can make, not save, money. You are not being cynical, just missing the point entirely.

  2. So SAP is just hiring more engineers then by JoeyRox · · Score: 2
    1. Re: So SAP is just hiring more engineers then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assburgers, not autism

    2. Re:So SAP is just hiring more engineers then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea antisocial geeks love to use the autism designation to explain why they're forever alone. Doesn't make it real.

    3. Re:So SAP is just hiring more engineers then by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Yea antisocial geeks love to use the autism designation to explain why they're forever alone. Doesn't make it real.

      Found one !

  3. HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about they just hire whoever is best qualified for the job, regardless of gender, skin color, age, or brain function? Just give everyone an equal chance? Is that too hard?

    The main problem is HR that should be anti-discrimination is the biggest discriminator. If you have dirty clothes and tattoos that might "reflect badly" on the company you've got no chance. Same with autistics that they think belong moving boxes in the warehouse so they don't upset the girls in marketing.

    1. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. If anything, it is the neurotypical persons that are more likely to receive discrimination. Neurotypicality is a handicap.

    2. Re:HOW ABOUT by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Troll

      They have identified a problem (autistic people find it hard to get good jobs) that they want to try to address. They are saying they want 1% of their workforce to be on the spectrum. That means 99% are not. So before you feel outrage at the terrible discrimination against the poor straight while males, consider that 99% of the positions are available to them.

      In fact 1% is about the proportion of people with autism of some kind anyway, so all they are really saying is that they want to stop (unintentionally) discriminating. By removing the barriers the ratio will reach 1% naturally, unless you believe that autistic people are simply inferior.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:HOW ABOUT by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      "unless you believe that autistic people are simply inferior."

      People with true autism have a mental handicap whether you like it or not. They CANNOT interact normally with other people and this is rather important even in IT where you may be required to work in collaborative teams. The lone antisocial bedroom developer might work for writing little homegrown apps but it doesn't work in large companies.

        Also hiring people because of their handicap regardless of whether they're as suitable as another normal candicate is not only patronising to all concerned but is doing the austistic a disservice as they'll more than likely struggle in the role and reinforce the stereotype.

    4. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're attitude is charming. Must be nice to have some rose colored glasses. How nice to think that the company is jsut being nice.

      Sure, they have a harder time at jobs. How much would you bet that they'll be paid less? Why are they screening for it in the first place?

    5. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is inaccess to everything "walled off" by the demands of social interaction.

    6. Re:HOW ABOUT by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also hiring people because of their handicap regardless of whether they're as suitable as another normal candicate is not only patronising to all concerned but is doing the austistic a disservice as they'll more than likely struggle in the role and reinforce the stereotype.

      Wow. How about you treat autistic people like human beings and accept that if they tell you they can do a job and appear qualified and make a good impression at the interview, maybe they are not lying?

      I have a disability. If I tell someone I can do a job it's not because I'm lying to get the job. That would be pointless, I'd switch to their company, be found out and end up unemployed. In fact I'd make damn sure that I could do the job and they would be accommodating before even accepting it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So before you feel outrage at the terrible discrimination against the poor straight while males,

      You do realize that you were the one to bring this up right?

      What happened no SJW story on Friday so your chomping at the bit for the next one to show up?

    8. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Where you may be required to work in collaborative teams"

      If they create a truly non-discriminatory workplace: they'll have 1% of their jobs without this requirement. It isn't especially difficult to create a proper scope of work definition. People do it all the time on Freelancer/Elance. It just makes the life of Management slightly more difficult because it takes the hand waving/horse trading/brainstorming phase of informal requirements definition and forces the manager to commit to quantifiable goals.

      In real life: this is probably a good thing because you end up with fewer miscommunication and disappointed expectations. You also end up with fewer employers chasing their own tails/wild goose chases doing busy work because a manager had a hair-brained idea and it wasn't expensive enough to task his reports with it to second guess it's brilliance/question the wisdom of spending labor hours on it.

    9. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hare brained. As in "Mad as a March ~".

      Are you "special" too?

    10. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact 1% is about the proportion of people with autism of some kind anyway, so all they are really saying is that they want to stop (unintentionally) discriminating. By removing the barriers the ratio will reach 1% naturally, unless you believe that autistic people are simply inferior.

      Yes, I think we all know affirmative action when we see it. This has literally NEVER worked out for anyone involved.

    11. Re:HOW ABOUT by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

      Neurotypicality is only a handicap when you're trying to install gentoo.

    12. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that unless you're a doctor or lawyer, any dip can do your job. Nobody cares how 'good you are' if you can't talk to customers or even make eye contact when you're talking to someone.

    13. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "good impression at the interview" is the hard part with autism.

    14. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really have no clue about what is autism.

      First, you should really publish a paper about this "true autism", because the DSM makes absolutely no mention of it. It just defines the autism spectrum.

      Second, although autistic people cannot interact "normally" with other people, they still can interact quite well for everything which is technical. Where they fail is with social interaction and the normal chitchat. So if you want your collaborative team to talk about what they did during the weekend, I'll agree the autistic person will look like an asshole. And yes, as normal people absolutely need those social interaction to be able to function (which can certainly be viewed as a handicap), this person unable to be "social" will cause problems with your team. But the solution is simple : just create a team of people who are less dependent on social interactions. Anyway, chances are this team will outperform the social ones.

      Third, autistic people are not antisocial. It's just that normal people do not tolerate a different social behavior, so they reject autistic people.

      BTW, I'm on the autism spectrum and because of my inability to endure the social games of coworkers for too long, I had to become self-employed (IT consulting, implementation and support). But you know what? If one day I met you for a project, like I do with all my clients, you may find me a bit weird (very talkative and "passionate" about my work), but you would be totally unable to guess I'm on the autism spectrum. The only way for you to think about it would be to either spend more than 4 hours with me (that's when I become so tired by social interactions that I can't act like a normal person anymore and return to my natural way of interacting with people) or by inviting me to a party or even a restaurant (which I will refuse anyway, as I know my autism will almost immediately become obvious in those social situations, unless it is in an environment which is really quiet and I know all people enough to understand their non-verbal communication).

    15. Re:HOW ABOUT by narcc · · Score: 1

      I never understood this bizarre fantasy so many Slashdot users have of being diagnosed with autism. It's not a superpower, it's a disability.

      It doesn't make you more logical, rational, or better at maths.

      It's not going to excuse antisocial behavior either.

      Instead of fantasizing that you are or could be autistic, how about you work on your maths, social skills, and hygiene. You'll find more fulfillment and success that way.

    16. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that isn't the autism they talk about on TV. The one Bill Gates put into all the vaccines to make people better at math but nerdy like him? But then it backfired and the terrorists found out so they blew up WTC on 9/11 with inside help from Donald Rumsfeld, then the FBI demolished WTC7 because it contained all the records of the evil autism experiments.

      That's what Bill Hicks told me on the Alex Jones Radio Hour.

    17. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a confirmation of everything you've experienced in life up until this date, be a fantasy? YOU are judging other people's opinion, and frankly unrightly so.

      However, at the same time I've repeatedly tried to explain to people close to me why they are probably not autistic, as they are highly functional in social settings even if they are smarter than most people. So you might be right. Some "smart people" might delude themselves to be autistic, when they are really just really smart, and probably repressed from childhood.

      In the end, only the autistic person herself knows how it is to live that life.

    18. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says autistic people can't interact with other people.. Oh....... You meant, they will not LIE to cover up everything, don't you?

      Fuck you asshole!

    19. Re:HOW ABOUT by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If they create a truly non-discriminatory workplace: they'll have 1% of their jobs without this requirement.

      Which is total bullshit. How about finding ways of enabling collaboration that suit people with diverse personalities and ways of working.

      I've been medically diagnosed as having Aspergers and I fucking love collaborating. I just hate sitting in a room talking to people all day. So I use IM a lot, I email people, I get on the phone rather than arranging face-to-face meetings, I schedule some quiet time, I work from home frequently.

      Other people have different tolerances, and different approaches. Being non-discriminatory means accepting multiple approaches, not going "oh, you're a special snowflake, your type don't need to be human". Fuck that.

      Being asked to work in a team has never been discriminatory for me. Getting fucked over at year end review because I don't smile when I'm not happy, sure. Getting harassed by female colleagues because they misinterpret my body language, sure. Getting suicidal because of the stress caused by trying to meet a manager's expectation of normality, sure. Getting turned down at a job interview because I couldn't read body language, sure. Getting called weird because I actually answer questions people ask me, sure.

      But really, being asked to do the job I was employed for? That's not discrimination. That's why I applied for the fucking job.

    20. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collaboration is just the weak freeloading off the strong and using political maneuvering to hog credit for the labor of others. Job listings that talk about these soft interpersonal skills at length are a huge red-flag to me that the workplace is a giant circle jerk in the process of running off the rails after getting hollowed out of talent by office politics. After they're done synergizing they like to put up job listings looking for rockstars to carry the friendship-circle's dead-weight when their last aspie quits.

    21. Re:HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, this "best qualified" thing isn't a mathematically well-defined thing. It's determined by shitty things like interviews and previous-job-history-just-like-mine, and professional qualifications and "he's a jolly good chap".

      The reason we're pushing so heavily for diversity is that if we've got 20 people in the room like P, then we probably don't need more P and it'd probably shake things up if we had some Q, R,S, and T. But that's not how people recruit, left to themselves.

    22. Re:HOW ABOUT by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Right, which means people on the autistic spectrum will get all of the good tech jobs and leave nothing for anyone else.

    23. Re:HOW ABOUT by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      Nice "no true scotsman" argument.

      Anyone who is on the spectrum, anywhere on the spectrum, has true autism.

      Many on the spectrum can be outstanding employees if they are given a little support. Aiming to bring the employee autistic population in to line with the general population's % is not that big an aim.

      If a company stated they wanted to increase their physically disabled employee count, and they aimed to do this by putting ramps etc in, so that the disabled can function in that work environment, this would be a non story. In fact it is such a non story that it is law in most places.

      So if this company aims to increase their count by saying "come work for us, we will invest $ in making a workplace accommodating to your particular needs" and that encourages suitably qualified candidates to apply, that is awesome. Even if you extend it out to having to give some people additional training, due to current lack of opportunities, then it is still awesome.

      If the company accomplishes it by just hiring unqualified autistics, and then not supporting them... that is horrendous.

    24. Re: HOW ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a shit what it's called if it negatively affects many very smart people's lives ? You act as if a nerdy individual can just have a normal social life if they just CONCENTRATE, or some bullshit. The cant, just as much as a popular kid generally can't hack assembly. So describe it however you want, it still affects people.

    25. Re:HOW ABOUT by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Collaboration is just the weak freeloading off the strong"

      ROTFL!

      I think you get the idiot of the month award for that one!

      If humans didn't collaborate we'd still be living in the fucking trees grabbing bananas you brainless tool.

    26. Re: HOW ABOUT by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Smart people care about solving problems. It's much harder to solve a problem if you willfully misdiagnose it as whatever's popular.

      Autism is to the nerd community as quantum physics is to Deepak Chopra's: mostly a convenient topic to borrow aspirational pseudo-science from.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    27. Re:HOW ABOUT by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I'm really smart and good at computers, so I don't need society. Gotta go now, I'm working on a GUI for this social networking site.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    28. Re:HOW ABOUT by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Your second paragraph suggests that you think autistic people have problems getting jobs (certainly true for many on the spectrum). In that case, the best qualified person available might well be on the spectrum, and by encouraging people with ASD to apply SAP may be finding more competent people.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    29. Re: HOW ABOUT by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Near one end of the autism spectrum, it doesn't necessarily cause negative effects on the whole. It's possible for a high-functioning autistic to learn social skills, but it tends to be explicit learning rather than implicit. High-functioning people with ASD also do better at some tasks and worse at others.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    30. Re:HOW ABOUT by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "true autism"? Many people on the spectrum can indeed work normally with other people in collaborative teams. It happens by a somewhat different approach, but that isn't necessarily a problem.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    31. Re:HOW ABOUT by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Also hiring people because of their handicap regardless of whether they're as suitable as another normal candicate is not only patronising to all concerned but is doing the austistic a disservice as they'll more than likely struggle in the role and reinforce the stereotype.

      Wow. How about you treat autistic people like human beings and accept that if they tell you they can do a job and appear qualified and make a good impression at the interview, maybe they are not lying?

      I have a disability. If I tell someone I can do a job it's not because I'm lying to get the job. That would be pointless, I'd switch to their company, be found out and end up unemployed. In fact I'd make damn sure that I could do the job and they would be accommodating before even accepting it.

      Autistic people are gifted. They can focus, and do a job exceedingly well. Give them programming, quality-control testing, and well defined tasks, and many can do that part better than the "brilliant, but scatterbrained" software engineer. SAP is in a win-win situition.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  4. They'll be working by bobstreo · · Score: 0

    On the Tech Support call line.

    I thought about 90% of all the people I worked with at SAP were either autistic, or lied on their resume about their qualifications.

  5. Holy exploitation potential! by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2

    I read this as, "Let's hire first-world developers, and give them non-stop coding work for 100 hour weeks. They love this sort of thing, so it's a win-win! And, we don't even have to pay them as much since they're just working constantly!"

    Actually, if it's not an exploitative relationship, why not encourage autistic hiring in development? It's a good counter-point to the recent hyper-social brogrammer style startup environment, where autistic tendencies would be frowned upon. SAP's a perfect test case for this as well -- anyone who has worked even on the periphery of an SAP implementation can attest to the insane system architecture and massive tower of layered code that's built up.

    I'm "normal" but tend toward the introverted side, like most "classical" IT guys and developers. It is nice to see some effort to cater to people who aren't natural-born communicators.

    1. Re:Holy exploitation potential! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In EU countries companies get serious subsidies if they hire people with disabilities ...

  6. Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for all the comments calling me a retard and other nice degrading things that american people find to be humorous.

  7. Similar to the progam by Goldman, Stanley etc by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    This program by SAP seems to be very similar to the very successful program that has been used by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citibank, RBS, Credit Suisse etc. The only variation seems to be, SAP is seeking people with autism related disorders. The pioneering companies mentioned earlier exclusively recruited people with psychopathy, narcissistic disorders, extreme apathy and similar disorders. It has been going on for so long the top management consists entirely of people with these afflictions, often multiple afflictions. Their "alumni" who have left for other companies have created similar hiring and promotion programs in other companies that the entire top echelon of Fortune 500 companies consists of these psychopaths.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Similar to the progam by Goldman, Stanley etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      successful program that has been used by Goldman Sachs

      Ah, that explained why they poached Ulrich Drepper.

    2. Re:Similar to the progam by Goldman, Stanley etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a +1 Frightening mod?

  8. Just hire them for QA by redmid17 · · Score: 1

    That will drastically reduce errors

    1. Re:Just hire them for QA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first. How well do you think people with autism handles specification changes?

    2. Re:Just hire them for QA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Survival of the fittest. "It's either me or the spec change!"

      If the spec change survives the QA staff, it's worth keeping going, and you eliminate an employees who shouldn't be there anyway.

      If the QA survives the spec change, he just proved himself beyond competent for the job and should be promoted to management.

      The problem literally solves itself.

  9. Wild Office Parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet they have some pretty wild office parties, huh?

    1. Re:Wild Office Parties by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There is a party in my head, and I wish I could invite anyone, but then again, I guess I'd not feel too comfortable.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. This is great, but honestly the closet is better. by netsavior · · Score: 4, Informative

    As someone who grew up with a diagnosis, and has worked as a software developer/team lead for 15 years, getting paid well, and even promoted into architect roles... I am super lucky that I focused on being able to "pass" early on.

    Though I am hired and paid and valued based on the skills that I have which are related directly to my diagnosis, I would never tell a perspective employer that I have the dreaded 'tism. Passing is much more lucrative, and even when I have a lower technical skill level than other members of my repressed class, I manage to make more money than them, because I can talk to management.

    I highly recommend "business" books such as "Hug your customers" and other trendy MBA type books. Business interaction isn't nearly as hard as say high school, or social gatherings, because business interactions have specific enumerated rules, that have been written down, and are generally agreed upon. This is a boon for Autistic people trying to have successful careers because that means we don't have to rely on an instinct that is present in others but not us. Business interactions are already scripted, and working a script is significantly easier than navigating unspoken social protocol.

    I applaud SAP for this initiative, but I urge working autistic adults to eliminate their own need for such programs by spending time learning the protocols of business, it is similar in scale to learning the rules to Magic the Gathering, but way more financially rewarding.

  11. Infosec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should look at the infosec community. Shed loads of Aspergers dickheads running around spending more time breaking shit, inflating their egos, and circle jerking at conferences than actually fixing problems. That's an inspiration for us all.

    1. Re:Infosec by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You're confusing the InfoSec community with the typical Fortune 500 user base.

    2. Re:Infosec by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 1

      That's an inspiration for us all.

      Is the "us" in your statement referring to dickheads, people who break shit, people who inflate their own egos, or people who circle jerk? Or are you, as I suspect, all four?

    3. Re: Infosec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U mad, bro?

  12. As a new SAP user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This explains a lot.

  13. I thought they already hired them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their UI already seems like it's designed by autistic engineers who can't relate to how "normal" people interact with computers.

  14. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    SAP is probably not hiring people who can pass as neurotypical in this program.

  15. popcorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bets on comments? 1024+ I say!

  16. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by netsavior · · Score: 1

    that is my point. It is a great program, but an autistic person who is hired outside of this program will be much less of a second class citizen, making it a much more financially desirable thing to pass as NT.

    Although it would be way less exhausting, and possibly worth the hit to your paycheck to not have to constantly watch your Ps and Qs, and to just let your Aut-flag fly all day. It just comes down to why you work. I work for money. I would prefer to do something I am good at and something interesting, but I wouldn't work at all if I didn't need money, so the thing that gets me the most money is the thing that I am going to do. It will not put a premium on comfort over money, that is nonsense.

  17. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Business interaction isn't nearly as hard as say high school, or social gatherings, because business interactions have specific enumerated rules, that have been written down, and are generally agreed upon.

    LOL, OK, on behalf of those of us without a clinical diagnosis, but craptacular human interaction skills ... for the love of god, please tell us where these rules are written down.

    Nobody told me there was a frickin' manual for this stuff.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  18. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    eh, I think I could probably get a lot more done and be a lot happier if I didn't have to bother passing, so it would be nice if telling an employer that I'm autistic was as simple as explaining that I'm left handed.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  19. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >but I urge working autistic adults to eliminate their own need for such programs by spending time learning the protocols of business

    Do tell us where you learned the protocols of business.

  20. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Business interaction isn't nearly as hard as say high school
    Get-by business interaction. I imagine that cranking it all the way up to sociable and charismatic requires a much more fiddly calibration, a more consistent, more comprehensive mastery of the... let's say social lexicon.

    Your point stands. Synthetic, conscious interaction isn't all that different from "the real thing". Because after you perform enough, the act isn't rehearsal, it's natural. Learn the steps. Lesson one? The dance steps aren't all rational. Don't lean heavily on reason and logic, some things will be plainly inefficient. A part of exchange and behaviors are done out of wasteful ritual, formality, courtesy, and in many scenarios will not be valid to initiate at all. Lesson two is being indifferent to that. Indifference is pretty important for a lot, really. Anything you can't fix.

  21. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be open about your autism to help kill off the stigma regarding personality disorders and mental health.

  22. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Multitasking in computer security can be somewhat dangerous. If you have multiple terminal windows open, the reboot command to reboot a workstation may get executed in the wrong terminal window and reboot a server with 50+ users. An incident my new coworker went through recently. Most users are understanding, but some are not.

  23. go read 'the speed of dark', covers this topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_Dark

    1. Re:go read 'the speed of dark', covers this topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it fall on the scale of Science Fiction About Ideas Science Fiction That Appeals to the Participation Trophy Generation?

    2. Re:go read 'the speed of dark', covers this topic by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend it. It's not terribly good.

      Maybe people that aren't classed as having ASD or Aspergers find it interesting, scary or insightful. I found it pretty dull and quite dreadful, and got very irritated with the internal monologue of the protagonist.

  24. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by netsavior · · Score: 1

    Ok so this is it, lets say you are a developer. Your boss, the "business people," the users of the software, the QA team, those are your customers. Secondary to writing code, you are a sales person, and your product is "please keep paying me money to write code" These are the fluffy, piece of shit MBA books that I live my work life by: Raving Fans
    Hug your customers
    I used to use a different book for Meetings, but this one is way better, and is even styled as if it is some sort of science: Powerfully Simple Meetings: Your Guide For Fewer, Faster, More Focused Meetings

    There are literally millions of books about how to deal with business people, I don't think it even really matters which ones you read. None are written for autistic people, but that is a good thing. Hug your customers is like a movie script for dealing with unreasonable people, which is mostly what you run in to if you think purely logically/logistically.

    Also, if you put these on your bookshelf in your office/cubicle next to the programming books, EVEN IF YOU NEVER READ THEM, it will increase the non-technical people's opinion of you by a significant amount.

  25. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Multitasking in computer security can be somewhat dangerous. If you have multiple terminal windows open, the reboot command to reboot a workstation may get executed in the wrong terminal window and reboot a server with 50+ users.

    That's not "computer security," chum. That's called "being a shitty sysadmin who doesn't know how to be careful about where and when he's executing disruptive tasks. You ALWAYS - ALWAYS - ALWAYS - validate what system you're on and where you're running before you reboot.

    Also - if your sysadmins are rebooting *workstations*? You're doing it way, way wrong. A single user workstation should be rebooted by the user themselves. Do you go around in the evenings and power off peoples' laptops before they leave for hte day, too?

    Jesus fuck, every time you open your mouth to opine about something, you sound more and more stupid.

  26. Knowing SAP... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    ...they're going to be responsible for the user interface.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Knowing SAP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just hoping they don't use them for customer service. Which is worse, talking with an off-shore help desk, or an autistic one?

    2. Re:Knowing SAP... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter why you don't understand the help desk rep?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. So they're going to make their software worse? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Good grief. Trying to get anything done is SAP is already a nightmare. Now they're going to give their convoluted instructions to people who will, sorry for the wording, mindlessly follow them to the bitter end and claim everything is okay?

    I used to joke that for being a German company, SAP didn't make very efficient software. I can only imagine how much worse it will now become.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:So they're going to make their software worse? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Well, can SAP get any worse?

      I'm thinking that since austic tend to be retentive and want simplicity the UI might actually improve!

      Have to wait and see I guess.

    2. Re:So they're going to make their software worse? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      This may actually be a very smart move on their part. As the architect of a very meta-driven, open-ended, polymorphous software framework, I have 2 things to thank for its ongoing elegance and lack of insane bloaty bullshit that is the SAP UI:

      1) I have drawn my most important lessons on how not to do things from the SAP UI - and I only interact with it to do a timesheet once a week. A few years ago I coined the phrase 'SAP-itis' to refer to frameworks so ridiculously abstract and poorly factored that the simplest possible use case employs 100 buttons / menu options and none of them make any goddamn sense.

      2) As somebody who is 'on the spectrum' as they say, I have a very strong urge for pattern recognition, which in turn makes me good at refactoring what seems like 1000 disparate/conflicting feature requests into a neat hierarchy of core functionalities that each make sense atomically and stack up to create complex functions without becoming spaghetti, both code-wise and visually. Also I have a habit of working myself to death on re/designing core functions rather than let somebody's sloppy idea of a 'good feature' dirty up my nice, clean framework by bolting it where it does not belong, and therefore spend a good deal of time essentially working for free.

      Something tells me that I am not unique in this pairing of dis/ability and that somebody at SAP has figured it out.

    3. Re:So they're going to make their software worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be worse to make highly intelligent and rational people do a rational and highly intelligent job?

      Besides, NT people are the type of people who tend to be lying and covering up for eachother, making deals etc., while someone on the autistic spectrum would be more open and honest.

  28. outsource dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so if they're hiring retards, will their eventual H1B replacements have to be retards, too? or would they get retard training?

    (aside: would outsourced PHB's be titled "naanagement"?)

  29. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, because that's been working really swell.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently in computer security being shitty as we've got mentally retarded idiot savants that can only hold 1 thing at a time in their heads running computing security! It explains the current sorry state of affairs in computing security in and of itself. Nobody's going to tell me they're "normal" either. They're not and far from it! They take things often far too literally and can't hold more than 1 variable in play at a time in their limited brains which are indeed, limited. That's what goes on in security in computing or programming: Holding more than one possible variable in play acting on all others as well!

  31. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if it's hard, per se, so much as it has an unsavory feel to it, particularly if manipulation is involved. That's why sociopaths do well as business leaders.

    Simon Baron-Cohen breaks empathy into two parts: cognitive (understanding people's thoughts) and affective (a desire to act appropriately). Autistics have functional affective empathy, but difficulty with cognitive empathy, while sociopaths have functional cognitive empathy, but little affective empathy. I think a lot of business culture, especially at higher levels, is driven by the ability to act without affective empathy. So it's not so much that the social rules are complex as much as they are disgusting.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  32. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    This.

    Even having to spend time with people I cannot "turn off" (by closing a window) is stressful to me. Especially if they want something from me, like an answer. My mind is usually a mile past the problem they're currently discussing, so coming up with an answer on the spot is anything but trivial for me. To stay in a single conversation demands more concentration than any "sane" person can possibly imagine.

    There is no possible price tag you could stick to something like this.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You ALWAYS - ALWAYS - ALWAYS - validate what system you're on and where you're running before you reboot.

    If you don't multitask and focus on one system at a time, you avoid rebooting the wrong system.

    Also - if your sysadmins are rebooting *workstations*? You're doing it way, way wrong. A single user workstation should be rebooted by the user themselves.

    If the workstation is in a pending reboot and no user is logged into the workstation, I reboot the workstation.

    Do you go around in the evenings and power off peoples' laptops before they leave for hte day,

    Corporate policy requires that users log off their workstations at the end of the work day. A corporate policy that most users routinely disregard. Since most users start work at 7:00AM, we have a 6:00PM to 8:00PM maintenance window that may initiate a reboot. Also, all workstations are rebooted on Sunday night.

  34. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why dont you just talk to girls, its not that hard. stop with the fake labels.

  35. Just Post an Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that says "Engineers Wanted". They'll get all the autistic individuals they can handle. :)

  36. reminds me of A Deepness in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Vernor Vinge's 1999 novel about humans colonizing the universe, where one group of colonists has developed to extreme authoritarianism. They use technology to enslave the most intelligent humans, forcing them to work as human computers while treating them as second class citizens.

    1. Re:reminds me of A Deepness in the Sky by avandesande · · Score: 2

      I thought this was a huge error in the Matrix- they should have been using the people's brains as 'cores' to actually run the matrix in which they were trapped. Could of added a lot of interest instead of the idiotic human battery thing....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:reminds me of A Deepness in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the original plan, but the test audience was too dumb to understand brains as processing units, so they changed the script.

  37. H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took this long for "H1B" to appear? /., I am disappoint.

    1. Re:H1B by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The comments for this article ae slow on the uptake.

  38. Makes sense by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    I doubt they are after those who are truly autistic, my guess is that they want the aspergers (functional autistic). Aspergers are known to have an attention to detail and focus on what they are doing that the current generation of developers do not have even under effect of pure caffeine, then you have better chances of having a good code in boring (but fundamental) cases that the teeny "rockstars" do not want to come close even with long sticks.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:Makes sense by sbaker · · Score: 1

      The definitions of Autism and Aspergers changed recently. The DSM (which is a technical book that is the bible for people dealing with mental disorders) came out with a new version last year that replaced Aspergers, Autism and a couple of related conditions into a new thing called: "Autism Spectrum Disorder" (ASD) - so in "official" terms, there is no longer such a thing as "Aspergers Syndrome" - it's just a range of symptoms on a spectrum that ranges from normality to the most severely Autistic people imaginable.

      So the smart/obsessive/geeky types who can earn a fortune in the tech industry now share the same pages in the DSM as people who can't even recognize that other people are "people" and who cannot communicate or perhaps who just rock back and forth endlessly.

      This is both a good and a bad thing...feel free to debate it endlessly - I've already been around that loop a couple of times!

          -- Steve

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
  39. What does that mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who grew up with a diagnosis,....

    "grew up with a diagnosis"?

    That could mean anything. And the diagnoses of autism along with hyperactivity is so misused as to make them utterly pointless.

    The mental profession and its diagnoses are so subjective. They think the DSM makes it objective but it hardly does. Put ten psychologists and psychiatrists in a room and you'll get eleven diagnoses.

    I a few years as neurology progresses, autism and hyperactivity are going to be quaint labels that never had any real medical value.

    tl;dr: You were misdiagnosed. Sorry, you're nothing special.

    1. Re:What does that mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As said by a typical NT who haven't really the capacity to empathize with others..

      Except you don't know how it is to be "special" all your life, do you?
      When you meet with people, do you usually feel invigorated, or tired/bogged down by stupidity and plattitudes?

    2. Re:What does that mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You described "introversion". Where's the autism come in?

  40. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Reposting the same comment doesn't make it correct a second time.

  41. Why all the negativity? by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    I am generally not in favor of quotas but when it comes to people with disabilities I think we should do all we can to help them get engaged in the workforce. The key is to find a job where that individual will be given the chance to excel. Just sayin.

    1. Re:Why all the negativity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The negativity is because this is clearly just an attempt to push gender discrimination with a positive PR spin.

      Since the autistic spectrum is almost exclusively the realm of males, biasing towards the autistic spectrum is just another way of defining anti-woman hiring behavior.

      ----------------------
      Ok, so I wrote that as sarcasm, in the tone of the /.SJWs, but now I've got this nagging suspicion that someone actually believes what I wrote above.

      My own view is that hiring should be based on relevant skills, and any plan like this should be implemented as efforts to recognize the technical abilities of applicants with more limited social skills. Maybe trying to train HR and the hiring managers how to recognize and work around autistic spectrum in applicants is a good first step, but the way the Slashdot post is titled and written makes me suspicious.

    2. Re:Why all the negativity? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      There's a hypothesis and some evidence that Aspergers in women isn't necessarily less prevalent than in men, but that women are far better at faking social interactions than men are and that prevents a lot of the problems which lead towards diagnosis.

      My own view is that hiring should be based on relevant skills, and any plan like this should be implemented as efforts to recognize the technical abilities of applicants with more limited social skills.

      Yeah, with you on that. Hire people that can effectively do the job, not people that know how to tell you that they can.

  42. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, rules in meetings, right, until Sales and Marketing get involved in the meetings, or executive perks or powers are somehow threatened (yeah right) by things.

    Or, you run smack dab into the realization that the new private equity "partners" are quietly or not so quietly rigging the business to ensure they get their 8% annualized return come hell or high water, whether that means saddling the company with so much debt to help pay for the "management fees", stripping the core assets out as part of "optimizing and focusing the business", or LBOs of other companies so they can also hide on the balance sheet all sorts of "management and consulting" fees.

  43. vaccination = job ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I have to do is vaccinate my kids, and then SAP will have a job ready for them!

  44. That explains their user interface by XXongo · · Score: 1

    "...the goal of recruiting and hiring 'hundreds of people' with autism" Yeah, that explains a lot about their user interface.

  45. Come on by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    Is this an advert? Looks like this "news" is in the ./ rotation. It comes up every now and then.

  46. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by sexconker · · Score: 0

    Is autistic.
    Tries to "pass" as normal.
    Creates username "king neckbeard".

  47. Re:SAP is for Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god for the cow troll. The only sanity around.

  48. I'd just like them to hire competent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to the knuckle-dragged apes which apparently made the version i use at work

  49. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the workstation is in a pending reboot and no user is logged into the workstation, I reboot the workstation.

    And then get murdered when the user discovers they lost work thanks to your "help?"

  50. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    What part of "no user is logged into the workstation" don't you understand? A user who is already logged out of the workstation is not going to lose data.

  51. Too many people self-diagnosing themselves by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2
    Listen, I used to think that I had asperger too but what really I suffered from was a lack of self confidence and a form of social anxiety disorder. I did not trust myself and my feelings about other people or other people.

    Here is what you should do. Get off your arse, start eating right and exercising and find a way to make new friends in the "real world". For me, that was by going to church and becoming involved in the Alpha course. Through that course, I learned more about the faith, met some great new people and I was able to completely surrender the portion of my life that should be a source of strength but was the source of my hurt and weakness to God. He removed my fear and replaced it with a spirit (holy spirit) of boldness.

    After years of bullying by schoolmates, my alcoholic father and other things, my psyche was pretty much shredded. I needed to surrender that last part of my life that I was holding back from god which was my relationships and hopes for relationships.

    After I did that, my social anxiety went away, I made friend after friend and I might even end up finding a soulmate now. I went from a wallflower who hardly knew anyone at my church after attending for years to someone who worked the room going from table to table greeting people I had met at a retreat at a recent party.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:Too many people self-diagnosing themselves by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Just...ugh. I think there are some scientologists that would love to talk to you.

    2. Re:Too many people self-diagnosing themselves by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      So, you handed in one disorder for another one?

      As long as you feel happier ... no objections.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Too many people self-diagnosing themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that comment went from zero to batshit crazy in record time. Congratulations!

    4. Re:Too many people self-diagnosing themselves by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What you just said is that you don't have Asperger's but figured out what your other problems were and solved them. Congratulations (and that's not sarcastic). You continue by implying that people with Asperger's can do just what you did and have the same success. Seriously, the ASD people I know have better logic than that, so I believe you misdiagnosed yourself.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  52. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This.

  53. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Cederic · · Score: 1

    why dont you just talk to girls, its not that hard

    I was 35 before anybody told me that someone asking, "How are you" as part of a greeting doesn't actually want to know. Yes, I had to be told.

    You really think the complex nuances of establishing potential relationships is 'not that hard' for someone that struggles with as basic a human interaction as that?

  54. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Cederic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because after you perform enough, the act isn't rehearsal, it's natural.

    Bullshit. I have to consciously remind myself to ask about someone's poorly child. I frequently think, "I'd better say because that's expected now" even though it's pissing me off by extending the conversation in a direction I just don't give a shit about. I put a lot of effort into almost every single conversation in the office - indeed, the only easy conversations are the ones with people that exhibit severe symptoms for Aspergers.

  55. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Cederic · · Score: 1

    I discussed this with medical professionals and they felt I should inform my employer.

    I haven't told anybody I work with. Some of them have clearly figured it out anyway, but have never asked or explicitly discussed it.

    I did inform the HR department, but under clear instructions they weren't permitted to tell my managers. As I said to them, I was employed to do a job and it's fair to assess me against my performance in doing that job. I want the managers to have the same expectations of me that they would of other employees, and I'm happy to work to meet those expectations.

    At this company (which I joined before diagnosis) it's working superbly. The only reason HR have been informed is in case the shit that's happened to me at previous companies happens again - with the benefit of hindsight I could've taken three different employers to tribunal for discrimination. At my current company I'm adopting approaches, working patterns, ways of working and decades of coping mechanisms to avoid any of that shit in the first place. Just knowing the underlying cause of the disconnects that caused the problems means I can compensate, adjust and focus the attention on the shit I do well, and minimise the negative impacts of the shit I just can't do.

    Going public would merely cause everybody to instinctively treat me differently. That may help or hinder, and it may indeed change general perceptions, but it would also put me under a social spotlight that - oddly enough - I'm not equipped to manage.

  56. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They don't want to be told? From reading these comments it seems like a bunch of people who feel forced by society to act a certain way whining about it. I don't see what it has to do with autism. If you don't want to know about someone's sick kid (to one of the other posts), don't freaking ask. That's disingenuous and some people can tell. If someone asks you "how are you" and doesn't really want to know, why are you having a conversation with them in the first place?

    Nobody is FORCING us to go out and make friends with every douchebag and bastard we meet.

  57. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Cederic · · Score: 1

    can't hold more than 1 variable in play at a time in their limited brains

    No wonder you're posting AC, registering for an account would require a modicum of intelligence which you've amply demonstrated you're sadly lacking.

    It's ok, I'm sure you're a nice person anyway.

    Incidentally have you considered that when you're talking to someone with Aspergers that they're concurrently processing the conversation with you, an internal dialogue examining your body language, an internal dialogue processing what you're saying to try and assess whether it's what you actually mean, another conscious examination of possible responses and which would be appropriate and very probably thinking through the complex problem that they'd have solved already if you hadn't walked over and asked your stupid fucking question in the first place.

    1 variable my arse.

  58. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I have to pass in the workplace. That doesn't mean I try to pass everywhere. That's one of the best parts about solitude, I don't have to meet anybody's expectations but my own, which I can assess much more reliably.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  59. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

    If you think that a lifetime of substituting cognition for intuition to cope with social bullshit doesn't give one the ability to juggle variables, I'm afraid you are the 'retarded idiot'. Also I think the people to which you are referring are not 'savants' (I don't think you know what that word means) but just garden variety idiots. A savant can hold 1,000,000 variables, scopes and branching conditionals in their head, it's just that none of them have to do with whatever dumb shit you are talking about and they just desperately want to get away from you.

  60. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't multitask and focus on one system at a time, you avoid rebooting the wrong system.

    Or, you could be a responsible professional, and validate what you're about to do, before you do it. Of course, if you like perpetually chasing jobs that are being offshored to mindless drones in India, that's fine. But don't you dare try to tell us that this is some sort of "security" practice.

    If the workstation is in a pending reboot and no user is logged into the workstation, I reboot the workstation.

    Most professional sysadmins would write automation to handle this for them. I guess that eliminates you from the pool of professional sysadmins.

    Corporate policy requires that users log off their workstations at the end of the work day.

    Again - professional sysadmins automate this. Thanks for letting us all know which camp you're in.

  61. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does show you're sensitive about your 'autismo brain' though.

  62. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. If you're so great at computing, what can you show us you've done that's good that reputable others spoke highly of? I'm sure you're just another mentally damaged inferior goods 'autismo' that's sensitive over being retarded and you can't show us shit. Some 'evasion' no doubt about how you could but you don't feel like it, right? Wrong. You're another do zero retard with a damaged brain.

  63. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show us something you've done that reputable others in the art and science of computing said is good then. It's always the same with you mentally damaged retards talking a lot but producing zero. You actually delude yourselves into thinking you're somehow 'superior' and yet you can't manage to accomplish anything worthwhile!

  64. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

    If you're so great at computing, what can you show us you've done that's good that reputable others spoke highly of?

    Show us something you've done that reputable others in the art and science of computing said is good then

    Oh shit is there a council of elders of 'computing' that I never knew about? How will I ever be taken seriously until they speak highly of my things that they say are good? Are they the ones that taught you to talk right by using words and think good stuff?

    I'm quite convinced that you are a troll or some kind of idiot Turing test gone off the rails, but I can't resist: who are these reputable people that were supposed to review my work before it was sold worldwide as a critical part of energy infrastructure reliability and automation? Is everybody in danger?

  65. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was right. You can't show anyone a damn thing or prove you're any good at computing. Typical deluded autism case.

  66. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

    Argh! I don't want to feed the troll but I so want to know what 'his' (your) idea of 'showing' good 'computing' is! C'mon - give us a taste! I assume from your incredibly odd and specific language that you must have done some amazing things in the world of computing that have been spoken of most highly by reputable people in the art (or you are suffering from some kind of aphasia, I can't tell for sure).. Lay it on me! Allow me to learn from this crushing defeat by getting a glimpse of true computing genius in all of its reputably regarded glory!

    Seriously though - I think you may be even further down the spectrum than I am. Just, you know, without the smart bits.

  67. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Or, you could be a responsible professional, and validate what you're about to do, before you do it.

    The best way to do that is to focus on one task at a time. Getting it right the first time is more important than getting it done fast.

    Of course, if you like perpetually chasing jobs that are being offshored to mindless drones in India, that's fine.

    My job requires a U.S. security clearance. Not too many Indians have one of those. My contract is also fully funded for the next four years.

    Most professional sysadmins would write automation to handle this for them.

    My department handles all the stuff that can't be automated. For example, a workstation that the user refuses to log out of has an up time of 30+ days, doesn't have the latest security patches installed, and won't automatically reboot over the network. Either the user reboots the workstation or I'll set a 60-minute timer for a forced reboot. Either way, the workstation is getting rebooted.

    Thanks for letting us all know which camp you're in.

    I belong to Camp Big Bucks, getting paid to do the jobs that no one else wants.

  68. Hire Marissa Meyer Please For God Sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If SAP start a "Hire The Retard" then they can hire Marissa Meyer.

    Ha ha THBBFT ~.

  69. Discrimination For = OK by brian.stinar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like the Americans with Disabilities Act only prohibits discriminating against people with disabilities, and not discriminating for them. I didn't see any mention of outlawing discriminating for people with disabilities (see Sec. 12112. Discrimination, here.)

     

  70. Well hot damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they could get me a backroom job as a server admin, I'd be more than happy. It'd be even better if I could do it from home. A tech support job would be great too, provided I were allowed to do my work without clients getting in the way. There aren't a lot of jobs out there for an antisocial aspie like myself, but I'd like to do something better with my life than just sucking wind on disability.

  71. Applaud the move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good move SAP!! Finally, a company that understands the nature of IT and the nature of many people who are naturally talented in that area, including many autistic. But even better, this is employing autistic people who are often rejected from the work force. Good for you SAP!

  72. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Really? Who told you that? Usually, they do want to know, at least a little, and a quick answer to the question is what they want. It's important to note, however, that they don't ask "How are you, and why do you feel that way, and could you tell me about the past few days of your life leading up to this?" They really don't care that much.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  73. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by Cederic · · Score: 1

    If someone asks you "how are you" and doesn't really want to know, why are you having a conversation with them in the first place?

    Welcome to society, where "Hi, how are you?" is a greeting and "Hi, I'm good, how are you?" is the expected response.

    Maybe you can get through an entire fucking day without walking into a room (or being in one someone else walks into) or walking past someone, or bumping into someone for the first time that day. I generally can't, especially at work, and in this country "Hi, how are you?" isn't a conversation, it's a societal norm.

    Nobody is FORCING us to go out and make friends with every douchebag and bastard we meet.

    No, just giving us a fuckton of shit if we don't obey societal norms.

    I don't see what it has to do with autism. If you don't want to know about someone's sick kid (to one of the other posts), don't freaking ask. That's disingenuous and some people can tell.

    Fuck me, are you dense or autistic?

    Functioning in 'normal' society requires conformance to certain norms. Autistic people don't necessarily notice that shit. They don't do it out of instinct, or at all.

    I could ignore someone's divorce, poorly child, crashed car, other sources of stress. I could ignore their birthday, promotion, lottery win, other sources of happiness. I frequently do. But I get a better response and a better relationship and a more constructive engagement with them if I do the bullshit smalltalk and fake interest up front before moving onto the topic of conversation that's made me talk to them in the first place.

    Is that them being a douchebag or bastard? No, it's them having an implicit understanding, acceptance and expectation of conversational norms and a level of disconnect with people that don't follow them.

    My point was that this is shit that people with Aspergers have to explicitly think about. It doesn't come naturally, no matter how much you practice it.

    Maybe some people can tell. Even then, they know you at least fucking tried. What's the alternative? Walk around being called weird, being called a douchebag or a bastard, being called insensitive, being called antisocial? Sure, that's an option. It's also a massive barrier to building friendships, relationships, a career..

  74. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've impressed various companies enough so that they give me a lot of paychecks for typing on their computers. Since a company can't make money employing me unless I produce a lot more value than I'm paid, I consider that evidence of being productive.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  75. Potential Abuse by Renaissancing · · Score: 1

    Just as long as these people are not exploited for their talents (extreme case, see "Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex", episode 11) and are treated as any other worker, sounds good to me.

  76. Re:It explains the sorry state of affairs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    For the record, I was misdiagnosed as mentally retarded due to an diagnosed hearing lost, spent eight years in special ed being treated like an idiot, skipped high school, and went to college. I'm a little bit sensitive.

  77. ASD !=ProtectedClassDisability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ASD does not rise to the level of recognition as a protected class disabilty, just another hindrance to normal living. Fcuk!

  78. Re:This is great, but honestly the closet is bette by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    News flash: Most people don't talk in words, they use "Sound symbols" that just sound like words. It's like ships passing, sending light flashes or signal flags to get a response so that they know the other ship sees them and won't collide with them (probably).

    Or, like secret agents giving a code word and getting a counter-sign word. it is not meant to be taken literally.

    Just give the expected sign/countersign and they will be able to avoid stress. It's much easier that way.

    By the way, these signal words are different in different areas. When you go somewhere, listen for the sign/countersign that is in use and copy it.
    (There are other things to pick up on, too. But they are beyond the scope of this discussion.)