Slashdot Mirror
Dell, Toshiba and Lenovo Utilities Expose PCs To More Attacks
jones_supa writes: It turns out that OEM helper software is still often quite fragile and can expose systems wide open to attack. Currently Lenovo, Dell and Toshiba all have unpatched vulnerabilities in their various support utilities for Windows. These vulnerabilities were discovered by a security researcher who goes by the name Slipstream, and he has posted details onlinealong with proof-of-concept exploit code. The vulnerabilities allow arbitrary code execution, planting malicious files and modifying system registry values.
haven't they always?
You have a doughnut in the low level of your operating system that can communicate online without OS kernel protection, so essentially you boot to ram a executable that can modify the OS section of windows with impunity. About the same as Homer Simpson putting a doughnut into the reactor core to moderate the control rods!
This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
"NON APK COWS" lol, this guy knows its stuff.
I really wish that there was a way to force hardware manufacturers to ship a vanilla OS without the value-added crapware. Maybe then older Android devices could get security updates, Windows and Android would be more secure and I wouldn't rage when stories like this hit the news. Again and again and again.
They just figured this sh*t out NOW?
I knew that their badly programmed softwares, that used way more resources than necessary, would be used for attacks long ago, that's why I always just create the recovery disks and then do a completely clean install of pre-built PCs.
awesome editing
Most companies that produce PCs view the software side of things as a value-add - it's a checkbox criteria "put some shit on the box so we can say we have more shit". Unfortunately they view the software precisely like this - it's just shit, and it gets hacked together on a shoestring budget with no testing whatsoever. For most of us it'd be better if they just didn't add it in the first place.
No amount of marketing can undo the technical incompetence of these companies.
Oh FFS:
"LSCTaskService is further associated with a file called LSCController.dll, which contains methods that can be called using HTTP GET and POST requests to its port. LSCTaskService can be made to run arbitrary code in the unprotected directory %APPDATA%\LSC\Local Store with system privileges, using a LSCController method called RunInstaller."
So javascript on a website can run arbitrary code with system privileges! FFS.
And Dell too? Having been caught installing a backdoor cert on its PCs, here it is again.
My mother's old Lenovo T41 recently crapped out on her finally and she almost went ahead and replaced it with a new Lenovo on her own. Luckily I stopped her with a stern lecture and bought her a spotless refurb'd HP elite book with a clean install of just win7pro that will do everything she needs and more. She had a huge disdain for anything "used" at first but when I educated her on superfish and other factory-grade malware that reassured her and she's loving it.
Now... if I get a call from her about allowing win 10 to overwrite that clean win7pro install I took an entire weekend to harden then I'm taking the elite book back and keeping it for myself (after scrubbing win 10 right back off).
may allah make all your goats pretty
We definitely need more outsourcing and H1-Bs. That would surely fix this.
Oh, the classic discrimination when you have no arguments, who'd thought it?
No but the PC Decrapifier will... https://www.pcdecrapifier.com/
Consider hardware brands that are more about a real clean OS install.
Consider other better OS options.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
s/app/Llanfairpwllgwyngyll
Go back to writing letters to your minders in the ward and quit spamming.
s/Llanfairpwllgwyngyll/Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch
You know, you figure after at least 15 years; it would become apparent who the real troll is...
http://arstechnica.com/civis/v...
http://www.thorschrock.com/200...
May I suggest some meditation? (I doubt the meds are working).
The whole OEM thing was a bad idea. You should have always bought a machine, a GENUINE hologrammed Windows (XP/Vista/7) disc with a KEY and sticker, and the OEM could optionally supply another disc with "Recommended Dell/Lenovo/Toshiba/Sony software". But no, pre-installed crapware and all available again from Alt-F11.
Now with Windows 10 it does not matter any more. The standard upgrade disc I pull out is a Linux distro... works every time and no OEM crapware. :)
It's value added software, that REDUCES the PRICE of your computer, you could say it's not "crapware" but subsidy-ware.
If this valuable software was not included, you could expect to pay 1.5X to 2X for your computer.
In fact I would go so far to say, that if the software is removed, payment should be made to the OEM.
Perhaps a software/hardware interlock could be designed, so if you want a non-subsidized PC, you simply enter your credit card , pay the manufacturer the true cost of the PC, and voilà, no more subsidy-ware.
A note on this, that I think is very important, is that Microsoft likes to stress that genuine Windows guarantees you'll be free of malware and exploits, but this is just false. In fact, I might even go so far as to say that it's the least guarantee (with the exception of Chinese flea markets.)
The one and only way to guarantee that your copy of Windows isn't infected with malware is to do the following:
Download the ISO from The Pirate Bay (use terms like untouched or MSDN with the OS version you download) and run an SHA1 hash against it. Google the hash, and if it matches what Microsoft publishes on the MSDN site, then you have no chance of being compromised.
Burn that or copy it to a thumb drive, boot it from bios, press shift+f10, type 'diskpart', type 'list disk', then 'select disk #' (where # is the primary boot disk number you see listed; likely disk 0), then 'clean'. There, now you've eliminated any chance of malware (and yes, this also wipes out the recovery partition, but you don't want it anyways as it likely contains exploitable OEM crapplets, plus it's needlessly using up part of your primary disk.)
"P.S.=> No single usermode slower messagepassing overheads laden browser addon does more for more speed, security, reliability, or anonymity online & FOR LESS + more efficiently, vs. "Bolting on 'MoAr' illogically - instead using what you already have that does it FAR better on most any & all levels... apk" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @08:28PM (#51092555)
Had to add that in above in bold - JUST FOR YOU - Allah knows the truth of those words from me too...
(God don't make no junk, & neither do I - since as I said last post? You're all YET to find a SINGLE BUG in my work in all you ac trolls + "ne'er-do-well" naysayers (especially the blowhard windbag ones, lol...)).
APK
P.S.=> From yours truly "The Lord of Hosts" (since you're wont to bring up religious things), so-to-speak... apk
"It turns out that OEM helper software is still often quite fragile and can expose systems wide open to attack"
Yes, we know.
In other news, water is still wet, the Sun still rises in the East.
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
Uh this is no more secure than if you paid for a retail copy and also verified the SHA1 or purchased an MSDN subscription. Vendor-installed OS may come already compromised or with malware installed. If you want to save money, you could achieve the same thing installing Linux and the steps to download are a lot simpler. I realize it's fun to get modded up for encouraging pirating Windows but it's not really a behavior that should be supported. The alternative to paid Windows is free Linux not pirated Windows.
See subject: From here on down http://it.slashdot.org/comment... : who're you *trying* to fool other than yourself as to who the trolls are around here?
I WIPED ARSTECHNICA OFF THE MAP in 2003-2006 @ Windows IT Pro easily - Jeremy Reimer got his website removed by Shaw of Canada his ISP & hosting provider + he was put on a tracking ticket by them for email harassment... his "henchman" Jay Little said "I am an EXPERT on Exchange" which much to his dismay worked against him @ "The Memory Optimization Hoax" where I proved to them AND Dr. Mark Russinovich (former "co-worker" of mine @ Sunbelt where we retailed our wares there & he bitched I outsold his work, awww) that that technology unhalted & sped up frozen Exchange Servers USING MICROSOFT'S OWN DOCUMENTATION TO DO IT (clearmem.exe is the same tech, but not GUI, & I designed the 1st program of that nature in GUI no less).
Jay Little then trolled & stalked me to other websites where I annihilated him on ramdrives as well - he was banned + had his website @ CrystalTech removed by that hosting provider for libeling me.
Bad move bringing up the DOLTS of Arstechnica - all they can do is "gossip" like old biddies behind my back, BUT OUTSIDE THEIR "PRIVATE PLAYPEN"? The results are QUITE different, see above, lol...
Thor SCHMUCK?
LMAO!
Hey - Ask him how CA is doing caught in reprehensible ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES & he tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...
You're the same kind of scum, but you're just as easy to dispatch with truth & facts.
APK
P.S.=> Still, what I said is the truth - I write wares that are "bulletproof & bugfree" (since none of you ever find any bugs in my program APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit
Or, for people who would prefer not to install some third-party crapware to get rid of other third-party crapware... you could type "windows start" into search, and it shows "See which processes start up automatically when you start Windows". Click on this (or press CTRL-Shift-Escape and click on the "Startup" tab), and you see a list of these processes. You'll see a category called "Startup Impact", with values of Low, High, or None (if disabled). You can right-click and disable these items right from that list, or open the folder location so you can figure out what they are, etc.
Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
You are living proof that God fucks up. There is no other explanation for a spamming little cunt like you.
The last fairly new HP I worked on has no entry in the uninstall list for "Hp Support Assistant." I traced where the program launches from and it uses an acronym to hide behind. Then the uninstaller the directory actually references some HP solutions framework thing. I tried removing that from its entry on the control panel and it said it can't remove it because it was needed by the HP Support Assistant. So I ran the uninstaller directly from the directory and it did quite literally nothing. So I had to remove the entire directory and every reference to it in the various boot time locations in the registry to truly kill it. That's what I like to call malware. It literally violates US laws pertaining to software having to be removable by the user if they want. I'm sure there's some preinstallation EULA BS to get around it though. Great upgrade to that crapware, HP!
Uh this is no more secure than if you paid for a retail copy and also verified the SHA1 or purchased an MSDN subscription.
The problem with a retail copy is that your software that rips it is invariably going to place its own timestamps and other variations in the file, so your checksum likely won't be valid. An MSDN subscription is also likely too expensive for most people.
I realize it's fun to get modded up for encouraging pirating Windows but it's not really a behavior that should be supported.
If you buy a computer that has Windows installed, and it comes with a COA, then you already own a paid copy of Windows. If you look at the license terms, the COA itself is proof that you own a copy of Windows, and so long as you install the same edition (home, pro, etc) and license channel type (retail, upgrade, OEM) to match that COA, then it's not a pirated copy. Want a simple way to ensure that? Easy: Download the best version possible (i.e. for 7, get ultimate, for 8+, get pro) and then when it asks, just type in the key listed on the COA. It will automatically select the version you've paid for and install it, and likewise it will even activate just fine with Microsoft's servers (or call in, if necessary.)
Holy shit APK you bear a grudge. The whole internet is tired of you. Please FOAD.
Don't project THEIR modus operandi onto me: GOD & MWNH were 2 usernames there I caught using the same email address & they also impersonated me, & edited posts I did, you fucking lying little shit.
APK
P.S.=> This is WHY arstechnica's the LOSERS of the internet & total weasel scumbags... apk
A computer illiterate friend has a Windows-infected computer and would like to replace the HDD with a SSD and has been nagging me to do it (because I must know how since I've used GNU/Linux the past 15 years and have no idea how Windows works). If I can just download some ISO for the version already on the old hard-drive and type in the things on the sticker and it'll be a genuine copy then that's fantastic.
As for the parent poster who was talking about "pirating" Windows: Please go kill yourself or give me my money back. You can't buy a non-Windows-infected computer and most of us have paid for dozens for Windows licenses that we've never ever used. If I ever do "pirate" a Windows copy then you can subtract that one against the zillion I've already paid for.
9/11: Never forget it was a false-flag operation
For those that don't speak the language, that's Welsh for, "Hello."
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Ask Ars' Jeremy Reimer & Jay Little why they have to host their playpen private sites at servers other than CrystalTech or Shaw.
Reason = email harassment of myself by BOTH of them, online stalking me, death threats, + libelous edited photos of myself by them also...
(I emailed a few folks @ arstechnica but never pretending to be anyone else. I had NO NEED to do that, & I caught MWNH + GOD ("two users there" who are really the SAME person, talk about impersonating others & sockpuppeting) using the SAME EMAIL ADDRESS for both usernames!)
APK
P.S.=> They're all a pack of do nothing significant in computing losers (ever) & YOU are obviously one of them... apk
I've been pimping APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit...
TFTFY, shilly-billy.
When I buy a laptop, first thing I do, is set it up how it comes from the factory.
After all the updates, I shut it down, pull the HDD, place a post-it-note on it
with the expiration date of the warranty, the model/serial and stick it on the shelf.
Then I put in a fresh clean HDD, install the OS, software, updates, etc and use
it like that. If I have any warranty issues, I pop out MY drive, put in the factory
drive and send it off, if need be.
Keeps the crapware off, and MY data stays WITH ME.
"No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @09:31AM (#50947415)
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
"In a footnote, I would like to note that I find your hosts file admirable." - by vel-ex-tech (4337079) on Tuesday November 24, 2015 @10:27PM (#50999097)
* Gosh: All you had was a downmod vs. this same post last time PROVING YOU FAIL fool -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
APK
P.S.=>
"You are living proof that God fucks up" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @11:20PM (#51093193)
No, YOU'RE you're stupid & outthought, out-smarted, & OUTED by contrary opinions from our fellow /.'ers saying otherwise of my wares & conduct here, troll! See the 1st quote above & "eat your words"... apk
"P.S.=> No single usermode slower messagepassing overheads laden browser addon does more for more speed, security, reliability, or anonymity online & FOR LESS + more efficiently using less RAM, CPU, & other I/O too vs. "Bolting on 'MoAr' illogically - instead using what you already have that does it FAR better on most any & all levels... apk" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @08:28PM (#51092555)
Had to add that in above in bold - JUST FOR YOU - & even Allah knows the truth of those words from me are unshakeable reality too...
(God don't make no junk, & neither do I - since as I said last post? You're all YET to find a SINGLE BUG in my work in all you ac trolls + "ne'er-do-well" naysayers (especially the blowhard windbag ones, lol...)).
APK
P.S.=> From yours truly "The Lord of Hosts" (since you're wont to bring up religious things), so-to-speak... apk
See subject: Says it all - he got his ass kicked from their servers just like Jay Little his pal from arstechnica did from Crystaltech (for email harassment, stalking me site to site across the internet, death threats, & libelous edited photos they did of me).
* They're losers, like all of "arseholetechnica" is - underachievers & losers producing ZERO of worth (highschool termpaper articles? Give me a break!).
BOTTOM-LINE: (again) - I produced a ware with NO BUGS you morons can find, as there aren't any in my work (ever)... lol, you lose.
APK
P.S.=> You're slime over @ arstechnica - & everyone online KNOWS it about you all - total trolling "ne'er-do-well" TRASH, nothing more... wastes of life! apk
I've been "p.r.'ing" APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...
Here around /. since mid 2012 when I 1st released version 5.0++ - 99% of the time in response to users using inferior browser addons!
Guess what:
NOT A SINGLE ONE OF YOU HAS FOUND A SINGLE BUG IN IT!
* :)
(When I write a ware there AREN'T ANY & it's "bulletproof + bug free" - you 'naysayer troll "ne'er-do-wells"' are my proof thereof, lol - thanks!)
IF there was one?
I'm sure that BY NOW you'd have found it... none to date, period.
NOW, how come "lil' ole' me" can write code like that, but these systemware makers can't?
APK
P.S.=> No single usermode slower messagepassing overheads laden CPU + RAM overconsuming bloated REDUNDANT browser addon does more for more speed, security, reliability, or anonymity online AND WITH LESS no less... apk
See subject: At least I have something decent unlike a loser like you that has NOTHING (lol, truth) & what I have does the job giving users more speed, security, reliability,+ anonymity online than ANY other single redundant resource overconsuming messagepassing overheads laden bloated browser addon does by far with TONS less using something you already natively have no less!
* :)
(Why am I able to do this & you're not? Well, 1st of all, you're too STUPID & LIMITED in computing skills as well as a no-mind in terms of understanding of things networking!)
APK
P.S.=> It must REALLY blow to be a "ne'er-do-well" like YOU... lol, no joke! apk
See subject: That's all I feel for losers from arstechnica who are probably the same little trolling "ne'er-do-well" losers here doing this.
* Wouldn't surprise me ONE bit... that's all they're good for (being morons).
By the way, why "downmod hide" the last time I posted this http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ? TRUTH HURT?? Yes... lol!
APK
P.S.=> Take YOUR OWN ADVICE & "FOAD" loser - The real entire internet's sick of you little useless fucks like Thor SCHMUCK (lol, ask him how Computer Associates had to downgrade the 'threat' from my program to ZERO/No Threat too) & ArsHOLEtechnica (home of the "ne'er-do-well" underachiever online, lol)... apk
No, the sticker is NOT guaranteed to work with a RETAIL or MSDN ISO. If you can get an ISO from that OEM it will likely work, but you still might have to activate by phone MS. If you grab a Dell OEM disc for a HP computer, you certainly will.
Instead of going that route, get a couple of extra files from the OEM Project, and you can install pre-activated copies of Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1. Here's a link to the project. Good luck.
There is also a z_a_D Loader (reverse those letters and remove the underscores) on that site. It could help you, in the case he has a Dell motherboard in a HP case, and wishes to have HP branding instead of Dell. Windows 7 only, and disk cannot have GPT. I know nothing about it though. You didn't hear it from me.
Convenience... Reinstalling an updating Windows can take over a day. The Dell Decrapifier (Old name) takes a few minutes. And it is trusted software these days.
The problem with a retail copy is that your software that rips it is invariably going to place its own timestamps and other variations in the file, so your checksum likely won't be valid. An MSDN subscription is also likely too expensive for most people.
This is decidedly not true, even back in the Windows 98 days. From what I recall, all you had to do was to ensure that the disc had the same name.
If you buy a computer that has Windows installed, and it comes with a COA, then you already own a paid copy of Windows. If you look at the license terms, the COA itself is proof that you own a copy of Windows, and so long as you install the same edition (home, pro, etc) and license channel type (retail, upgrade, OEM) to match that COA, then it's not a pirated copy. Want a simple way to ensure that? Easy: Download the best version possible (i.e. for 7, get ultimate, for 8+, get pro) and then when it asks, just type in the key listed on the COA. It will automatically select the version you've paid for and install it, and likewise it will even activate just fine with Microsoft's servers (or call in, if necessary.)
Also not true. There's a way outside Microsoft to pre-activate software (at least Windows 7). All that are needed are some certificate files in the OEM/$$/OOBE section of your install DVD or USB.
Let me direct you to MDL, specifically the Projects & Applications area. To be clear, this is not a piracy site, this is just a bunch of hackers working on things like BIOS mods (allowing your laptop to run all WiFi cards / unlocking hidden menus), Pre-install activation, retail copies from digital river, and K-M-S servers for Enterprise and VL versons of Windows. Not for piracy, but just so they can figure out how those things work.
Anyway, back on topic, it's easy to roll your own disc to do a fresh install, as long as you can get it from a trusted location. Sadly, as of Windows 7, you can no longer slipstream service packs into your source discs, so you have to download each new version manually. I'd been slipstreaming Service Packs back into my discs since the Windows 2000 days. Nu2.nu was a great reference for getting ISOs to boot off of CD ROMs that had the El Torito extensions required.
This is decidedly not true, even back in the Windows 98 days. From what I recall, all you had to do was to ensure that the disc had the same name.
This depends on a few things; namely, what retail copy did you buy? Not all of them are on MSDN, as that isn't its intent. In addition, as I stated, some tools add their own bits and do things in their own manner. Using a tool like dd will get you a proper hash, but again, assuming you have the right disc.
Also not true.
It's very much true, and nothing you say below contradicts what I said.
There's a way outside Microsoft to pre-activate software (at least Windows 7). All that are needed are some certificate files in the OEM/$$/OOBE section of your install DVD or USB.
Why go through all of that when you can just type in the key? Granted in some cases the ei.cfg file is set so that it's only for a certain edition, but if you simply delete it you don't have that problem.
Sadly, as of Windows 7, you can no longer slipstream service packs into your source discs, so you have to download each new version manually.
Not true, the process is just different. You can still slipstream drivers, updates, etc as well. You just have to use the dism tool on the WIM files. In fact, MDL describes that process quite well.
No, the sticker is NOT guaranteed to work with a RETAIL or MSDN ISO.
There's an easy to make it work if it doesn't: Simply delete the ei.cfg file. In fact, that's the only thing that sets the difference between the different version discs since Vista and up.
There is also a z_a_D Loader (reverse those letters and remove the underscores) on that site. It could help you, in the case he has a Dell motherboard in a HP case, and wishes to have HP branding instead of Dell. Windows 7 only, and disk cannot have GPT. I know nothing about it though. You didn't hear it from me.
If you're going that route, then just use any ol' ISO you want (so long as hash is correct) and tell the Daz loader to activate based on your BIOS SLIC image. It will convert whatever you have to an OEM copy, and it won't even need to install its bootloader.
NOT A SINGLE ONE OF YOU HAS FOUND A SINGLE BUG IN IT!
One does not find what one does not seek.
also need a lot more lowercase because apk yells and slashdot don't like that.
See subject: I expect too much sometimes from the likes of trolling menials (@ most/best) in the art & science of computing like yourself... lol!
* You wouldn't even KNOW how to go about it!
(My mistake/"my bad"/mea culpa)
APK
P.S.=> You trolling fools are SO WEAK it's pitiful - I hope you realize what a waste of life you all are before it's too late and you're just wormfood in a pine box 6 ft. under... do something USEFUL with your life instead of being a troll scum online... ok? apk
http://answers.microsoft.com/e...
If his computer was made by a manufacturer which is still around, he can get a recovery DVD from the company for a small fee.
If not, see the section of the page titled "What to do if you cannot get recovery media from your manufacturer". Basically, you take a retail copy of the OS in question and delete a .cfg file. That will allow you to install the OS using an OEM key. This is actually a lot easier if you use a thumb drive to install the OS rather than a DVD, since with a thumb drive your can just delete (or rename) the ei.cfg file.
See subject: Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phish
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) EZ data control
16.) Block ads more efficiently vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.
APK
P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).
---
Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...
---
ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!
---
Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
---
Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).
---
AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...
---
What's best?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
& Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...