Slashdot Mirror
Quantum Computer Security? NASA Doesn't Want To Talk About It (csoonline.com)
itwbennett writes: At a press event at NASA's Advanced Supercomputer Facility in Silicon Valley on Tuesday, the agency was keen to talk about the capabilities of its D-Wave 2X quantum computer. 'Engineers from NASA and Google are using it to research a whole new area of computing — one that's years from commercialization but could revolutionize the way computers solve complex problems,' writes Martyn Williams. But when questions turned to the system's security, a NASA moderator quickly shut things down [VIDEO], saying the topic was 'for later discussion at another time.'
It's a news conference and they likely weren't prepared to field security questions. That doesn't mean the security is lacking. It just isn't what they were there to talk about.
The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
Trollin' like it's 1999.
You go girl!
...a NASA moderator quickly shut things down [VIDEO], saying the topic was 'for later discussion at another time.'
No, you may not ask us how the NSA plans to use the d-wavies to make mince meat of all existing encryption protocols.
I'm wondering if this fits in with this story about a quantum computing grant for IBM, as well: http://www.zdnet.com/article/i...
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
Ahhh well, just another phase in the evolution of NASA from a can do engineering organization, to a can't do political pork barrel.
What the hell are you talking about? Nobody used that phrase but you. Watch the video. He gives a reasonable answer, and then they try to steer the questioning to other topics so it doesn't get bogged down.
The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
Really need SIDH ECDSA ASAP... Nothing seems to have been officiated as of yet though :/
The "NASA moderator quickly shut things down?"
Watch the video. Who gives a fuck?
By shutting it down during questions about security, it could mean they don't have any more prepared answers and don't want to talk about it. That's not what the press event was for. csoonline's headline is making it sound like the questioner was asking Dangerous Questions About Black-Op Shit We're Not Supposed To Talk About.
Nah, it is just because quantum computing is relativistic therefore, nothing they may say will always be true, it always depends of the user point of vue... ;-)
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/...
Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
As a scientist working with quantum computing I can explain exactly why we dont talk about security and quantum computing. Last month we executed a security benchmark against it, and unfortunely the act of measuring the system security managed to accidentally change the entire quantum computer into a loaf of artisinal bread. We worked hard to change it back, by attempting to measure how inseucure the device was, but in turn only managed to collapse the waveform and ended up with a loaf of bread that was also a quantum computer. Weve not been entirely truthful with the public about this in the past but we can assure you that once we assemble what our team is tentatively referring to as a wheel of quantum swiss and a quantum superposition of 3 kinds of smoked meat, this hamiltonian evolution of delicious cold cut should get us back to a regular quantum computer. security concerns so far are centered around penetration attacks, and keith on the second floor trying to use the quantum artisinal loaf for a peanut butter and banana (regular, not quantum) sandwich.
Good people go to bed earlier.
All modern crypto, except key exchange, withstands quantum computing fairly well. Unfortunately, you will get pwned and get your symmetric keys extracted during key exchange. The only work-around that I am aware of is using preshared keys.
How about Quantum Computer Porn? Do they have anything to say about that?
NSA + ALEX = ANAL SEX
This doesn't really deal with the real issue, the fact that the vast majority of what D-Wave is doing is complete hype with a very tiny chance of having any practical impacts. It isn't even clear that the type of problems D-Wave's machines can handle are problems where we should expect any substantial speedup from quantum computers. D-Wave's latest attempt at claiming that their computers show noticeable speedup is less lacking than some of their previous claims, but still not at all impressive. See Scott Aaronson's blog post http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2535 where he notes that the D-Wave machine both doesn't give any apparent asymptotic speedup and is beaten by the best classical computers. The real question isn't security but why NASA is wasting money on this instead of more promising quantum computing research.
Engineers from NASA and Google are using it to research a whole new area of computing — one that's years from commercialization but could revolutionize the way computers solve complex problems, ...
[ Sorry, I guess that's only funny if you've seen the TV show Better Off Ted. ]
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
A long time ago, we had a space shuttle that blew up with a teacher on it. That shuttle was named Challenger and after it blew up there was a rather lengthy period of downtime and a review. In that review a gentleman named Feynman stuck a gasket in a cup of ice water to show how brittle it was. Eventually, they solved this problem and launched the shuttle again.
Why do I tell you that?
Well, a couple of weeks before the shuttle resumed launching, NASA had their networks compromised and someone (they think it was an Australian) put a bit of "fake" malware on a bunch of their networked computers. The malware didn't do anything except display an image and say it was going to do something or threaten to do something.
Why do I tell you that?
Well, NASA's had shit security in the past and managed to fix it. They've overcome some of the most intense engineering issues of our time at so many levels that I can't even begin to enumerate them. That you're willfully ignorant of history says more about you than it says about NASA. They're still doing some of the best engineering on the planet. I think a good, recent, example would be a few snapshots of a planet(ish) body known as Pluto.
They're doing fine.
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Well I think I found the guy dosing on LSD.
cats with buttered toast strapped to their backs
- Cats land on their feet.
- Buttered toast lands with the buttered side down.
- Which way does a cat+buttered toast land when the toast is strapped with the buttered side facing away from the cats back?
Yeah, if you actually bother to take 2 minutes to watch the video, it doesn't match the "NASA moderator shut discussion down" description at all. This is just an attempt to generate controversy where there is none.
LOL I can't. Your post makes it obvious you took everyone's.
NASA could be in a quantum state
But make me pay for it.
If NASA actually has a a real, practical, working quantum computer, they could discuss it any time they want, both earlier and later. And still could have the discussion any time after they first built the damn thing.
Seriously, for NASA to clam up like this is atypical of usual NASA culture. I suspect one or another of our 3-letter agencies have been pressuring them.