Slashdot Mirror


Chipotle Plans To DNA Test Produce After E-Coli Outbreaks In Nine States

HughPickens.com writes: Lisa Jenning reports at Restaurant News that Chipotle plans to do DNA-based tests of all fresh produce before it is shipped to restaurants. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that the E. coli outbreak linked to Chipotle now includes seven more people in three new states, including Illinois, Maryland and Pennsylvania, for a total count of 52 sickened in nine states. Most of the illnesses were in Washington, with 27 cases, and Oregon, with 13 cases. Twenty people have been hospitalized but there have been no reported deaths. Health officials say a meal or ingredient from Chipotle was likely the cause, but they have not yet identified the specific source of the outbreak. Chipotle's founder and co-chief executive, Steve Ells apologized to patrons who fell ill after eating at the company's restaurants. "This was a very unfortunate incident and I'm deeply sorry that this happened, but the procedures we're putting in place today are so above industry norms that we are going to be the safest place to eat." The chain will begin end-of-shelf-life testing to ensure quality specifications are met throughout the shelf life of products. The data collected will be used to measure the performance of vendors and suppliers to enhance food safety throughout the system.

But food safety experts are mixed about the effectiveness of such screening efforts for the prevention of foodborne illness. Bob Whitaker, chief science and technology officer for the Produce Marketing Association, says such tests are not practical as a screening tool. Instead, restaurant chains should focus on whether their suppliers have adequate food-safety programs in place. "You can't test your way to safety," says Whitaker. "The problem with product testing by itself is that it's hard to take enough samples to be confident that the product is free of any pathogens." DNA tests are considered among the most accurate and fast, with same-day testing available for organisms like E. coli or salmonella, says Morgan Wallace. Some manufacturers don't wait for results, since produce is perishable, but that introduces the risk of a produce recall if a pathogen has been identified after shipment. Others hold the product until test results are confirmed, but that practice adds holding costs and reduces the shelf life.

147 comments

  1. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they actually cooked the food properly instead of leaving it luke-warm, this wouldn't be a problem.

    1. Re:Well.. by bmo · · Score: 2

      That doesn't help when it's the lettuce or some other serve-cold produce.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Well.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      If they actually cooked the food properly instead of leaving it luke-warm, this wouldn't be a problem.

      This has nothing to do with cooking. This is raw produce picked by farmworkers that didn't wash their hands after taking a dump. The solution is better field sanitation and better enforcement. The farmworkers need to have clean toilets, and they need to wash their hands in chlorinated water, and that hand washing needs to be mandatory and observed, with penalties for violations.

    3. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but I'm quite sure that wouldn't even account for half of the contamination.

      Obviously there needs to be a better method of verifying the safety of these foods as they hit stores and go into the hands of prep cooks.

      I think you just like using that story because it lets you insult poor people and imply they walk around with their own feces on their hands all day. It's ok, I saw the same thing on a documentary about the Gulf War. The difference is, those were jarheads without internet and you are still managing to sound stupider.

    4. Re:Well.. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      But who observes the observers?

      My guess is that it's just a lack of education on the part of the immigrant labor that's picking the produce. Tell them it's a health risk and make sure that they have something to wash their hands and that will probably go a long way to solve the problem.

      Also, a lot of this type of work is being done by people who aren't here legally. If you think a solution with mandatory hand washing observation is going to work, I don't think you've thought this through all that well.

    5. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's actually one of the most rediculous things I've read this week, what you just said. Do you know what soil is made up of, largely? It's made of SHIT. Do you know what farmers mix in with the soil to enrich it? SHIT. Do you realize that fields are open to the sky? Do you know what birds do while they're flying? They SHIT. Small animals and insects roam around in the fields, and do you know what they all do everywhere they go? They SHIT. Even earthworms, which are extremely beneficial to the soil and vital for the entire ecosystem? They eat soil and they SHIT it back out. It's all SHIT. Blaming farm workers for not washing their gods-be-damned hands after taking a SHIT is about the stupidest thing you could blame this on, and it shows beyond the shadow of a doubt that you've never even SEEN a farm let alone actually knowing anything about growing food crops or running a farm.

    6. Re:Well.. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      More likely the usage of liquid manure from cows or pigs as fertilizer.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Very true, and furthermore, short of hand-washing each leaf, there's no way they can guarantee against e. coli.

      This all started because they wanted to appeal to the food religion by going organic, which means growing vegetables, literally, in cow shit. Synthetic fertilizer doesn't have this problem. It's not at all a coincidence that they had ZERO problems before that switch.

    8. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shitpotle

    9. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when one has shit for brains they tend to have shit on the brain... ;)

    10. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      No, that's not it at all. It's organic farming. E. coli outbreaks are NOT AT ALL uncommon. Notice how they never had this problem prior to switching to organic?

      http://www.science20.com/scien...

      Not only is organic food NOT beneficial from either a taste or health perspective, it's actually scientifically shown to be worse due to exactly this issue. Furthermore, it's bad from an environmental perspective because it requires more farmland, which means more water consumption and more deforestation where applicable.

    11. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My guess is that it's just a lack of education on the part of the immigrant labor that's picking the produce.

      Nope, this is why:

      http://www.science20.com/scien...

    12. Re:Well.. by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't help when it's the lettuce or some other serve-cold produce.

      Perhaps they could just wash the produce before serving it? It's a simple courtesy I extend to guests I don't feel like killing.

    13. Re: Well.. by bkgoodman · · Score: 0

      It depends on the kind of shit. From cows, earthworms of herbavores is completely different from that of humans, or other carnevores. It depends on the gut bacteria of the creature taking said shit. You cannot fertilize a field with human waste.

    14. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Un-scientific rant...brewed coffee has nothing to do with Chipotle produce, which isn't even organic.

      Now, do tell us about those new anti-e.coli genes......

    15. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very science-y! And Chipotle didn't switch to organic. And GMOs aren't being made with "anti-e.coli" genes.

      But reading a crank rant about the chemicals in brewed coffee really nails to point home.

      Have a nice day...

    16. Re:Well.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3

      More likely the usage of liquid manure from cows or pigs as fertilizer.

      No. Farmers may spread cow/pig poop on a cornfield, but they do not, and cannot legally, spread fresh manure on produce that is eaten raw. They can use manure that is thoroughly composted, but by then the e-coli is long gone.

    17. Re:Well.. by Maow · · Score: 1

      If they actually cooked the food properly instead of leaving it luke-warm, this wouldn't be a problem.

      This has nothing to do with cooking. This is raw produce picked by farmworkers that didn't wash their hands after taking a dump.

      Can't it be from, say, bird poop dropping onto the produce while it's in the field as well / instead?

      In fact, that seems more likely to me - if that's a possible vector.

    18. Re: Well.. by SheilaThomas · · Score: 1

      I agree. I was puking lettuce and sofritas. See my video" Sheila exposes Chipotle for Ecoli" you tube.

    19. Re: Well.. by SheilaThomas · · Score: 1

      This has Everything to do with cooking at proper temperatures, I sent the Department of health into Chipotle San Jose, California and they were sited for undercooked Rice and Tofu. Please educated yourself.

    20. Re: Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that have to do with anything at all? Nobody is doing that, nobody is suggesting it's being done, and a five-second Google search shows that e. coli is carried by animals, and it doesn't make them sick; suggesting, or supporting someone who is suggesting, that e. coli contamination problems are coming from farm workers who don't sterilize their hands after using the toilet is just plain ignorant, so could everyone please stop being so fucking stupid?

    21. Re:Well.. by BKX · · Score: 2

      Even washing each leaf with bleach won't actually work. E. coli can easily get INTO the leaf in spinach, and that has happened. I remember a massive spinach recall a few years ago with e. coli being INSIDE the spinach leaves themselves. I don't see why lettuce would be any different. I absolutely refuse to eat organic salad for this reason.

    22. Re:Well.. by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      Maybe you missed the part about the e coli being inside the leaf and not being able to be washed off.

    23. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know this? This sounds like something you just made up.

    24. Re: Well.. by whimmel · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. It's called Night Soil.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    25. Re:Well.. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Almost any "organic" produce you can buy on the scale of a restaurant isn't really being raised by organic methods.

      For example

      Free range chickens wander about over acres of grasslands eating bugs. Like wild caught salmon, eggs from these chickens are bright orange.

      Meanwhile, "organic" and "free range" eggs in grocery stores and restaurants come from hens who literally qualify for the "free range" label by having access to a plant free, bug free muddy fenced plot next to the roosting area. In at least one case, it was a concrete lot. Likewise, the yolks from psueodo organic food are yellow (not orange). Some of the better ones are a strong yellow vs a pastel yellow but that's about it.

      Organic food practices produce measurably better food (lower cholesteral, higher vitamins, lower saturated acids) with measurably lower results (50,000 survey in Britain showed lower weight and 9% lower lymphoma risk).

      Conventional foods (and government certified fake organic foods) are essentially the same as conventional foods so of course tests find no differences.

      The largest cause of ecoli contamination is someone touched something's butt and then didn't wash their hands thoroughly. Use of recreational water on crops is another source of contamination.

      Hate to break it to you but cropland is built on animal crap. Most of the mid west is thousands of years of buffalo eating and pooping.
      Soil without poop is basically "sand". But it needs time to compost for the bacteria to die off.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    26. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "news story" is probably just a attempt by chipotle to get their stock prices to rise again while trying to get customers to come back to their store front even though they have no idea the cause of the previous problems.

      Why not just use UV light as part of their preparation in-store? ( https://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2004/Projects/J1303.pdf )

    27. Re: Well.. by bytesex · · Score: 1

      You carry Escheria Coli as well, just not so much near the intake of your food; much more where it comes out. Getting it (and even then: certain varieties that we're not certain of) near the intake of your food (i.e. in your stomach) is where it wreaks havoc.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    28. Re:Well.. by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      Maybe I missed it because the only comment alleging this was posted four hours after my comment. Seeing as there's no mention of the allegation in TFS or TFAs, maybe you can see why I missed something that wasn't there.

    29. Re:Well.. by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Not only is organic food NOT beneficial from either a taste or health perspective, it's actually scientifically shown to be worse due to exactly this issue.

      The local produce I buy or grow myself is fresh from the ground and tastes a hell of a lot better that what you'll find in a big box grocery store. Wash anything you eat raw, it's common sense.

    30. Re:Well.. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depends on the time till it is harvested or not? Sounds not logical that it is "illegal" but well the US has lots of strange things that are legal or illegal.

      In Germany it is completely normal to put manure on the fields, any field. However not shortly before harvesting (where it makes no sense anyway).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    31. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Free range chickens wander about over acres of grasslands eating bugs. Like wild caught salmon, eggs from these chickens are bright orange.

      No, that just indicates what the chicken was fed, not whether it was allowed to walk around. Feeding them marigold flowers are enough to yield bright colored eggs, even if they were held in a feeder cage their whole life. Though some people claim the darker yolk is healthier. Personally I can't tell the difference in taste. Anyways, what the chicken is fed will obviously change the egg color and nutritional content, but that doesn't mean free range either tastes better or is healthier.

      Organic food practices produce measurably better food (lower cholesteral, higher vitamins, lower saturated acids) with measurably lower results (50,000 survey in Britain showed lower weight and 9% lower lymphoma risk).

      Hmm...While I haven't seen where you source this from, it doesn't sound likely.

      First, dietary cholesterol (i.e. the cholesterol found in food that you eat) doesn't actually raise your blood cholesterol unless your liver determines that body is deficient in cholesterol, so I'm not sure how lower cholesterol is supposed to be a benefit. When people have high blood cholesterol, it's typically because they're consuming such a high amount of simple sugars (including "organic" sugar, if you want to go that route) that their liver is having to convert the excess glucose into lipids. If you've ever heard of how "foie gras" is made, this is basically what people with high cholesterol are doing to themselves. Simple sugars come from a lot of sources that you probably don't expect as well, like bread, fruit, rice, and pasta.

      Second, you're going to need to be specific on vitamins, and more importantly, what the animal was fed. Yes, there will be a difference in nutritional content AND taste when it comes to say corn fed beef vs grass fed beef. Whether or not it's organic doesn't play a role in that however.

      Third, saturated fats are actually not bad for you. The bad fats are trans fats, which aren't found in meat products unless they're fried or cooked using some kind of vegetable substance that has hydrogenated oils. The original fear for saturated fats came from the same false fear over dietary cholesterol. That is, they associated higher saturated fats with higher cholesterol. The reason this happened is because saturated fats from dietary sources help the body fill its own lipid needs faster, therefore when your liver produces its lipids, it creates more lipids that remain in the blood (cholesterol, triglycerides) thus making the numbers appear "worse".

      Fourth and finally, you're going to see a reduction in disease among people who follow just about any controlled diet. The reason why is because these people tend to do less things that are well known to be dangerous like smoking, drinking, and drugs, and furthermore, they're more likely to exercise.

      The largest cause of ecoli contamination is someone touched something's butt and then didn't wash their hands thoroughly. Use of recreational water on crops is another source of contamination.

      No, it's not. There's actually a LOT of evidence that most e. coli and salmonella outbreaks are caused specifically by organic farming.

      http://www.science20.com/scien...
      http://www.realclearscience.co...

      Organic spinach and sprouts in particular are especially risky. In fact, organic sprouts are so dangerous that big chain stores Kroger and Wal-Mart have an official policy to not carry them.

      http://www.toledoblade.com/Ret...

      Hate to break it to you

    32. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's actually not a bad idea, but I'm pretty sure they can't label something as organic if it has been irradiated.

      I would have to research that to be sure, but in general, when it comes to organic, technology is frozen in the 1950's, because according to organic dogma, technology = bad, because you know, it's not "natural", even though there's no scientific evidence that "natural" is better.

    33. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      The local produce I buy or grow myself is fresh from the ground and tastes a hell of a lot better that what you'll find in a big box grocery store.

      People say things like this all the time, but it never passes a blind taste test.

    34. Re:Well.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      E. coli can easily get INTO the leaf in spinach, and that has happened. I remember a massive spinach recall a few years ago with e. coli being INSIDE the spinach leaves themselves. I don't see why lettuce would be any different. I absolutely refuse to eat organic salad for this reason.

      You do realize that the way the E.Coli gets into the plants in the first place is via animals shitting on the produce, right? The only produce immune to this problem is grown indoors. In addition, crops grown organically are not the only crops fertilized with animal waste. Add to that the facts that manure is not used in all organic farming, and that no disease outbreak has been traced back to manure used on an organic farm and you will see that your policy is laughably superstitious.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:Well.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not only is organic food NOT beneficial from either a taste or health perspective, it's actually scientifically shown to be worse due to exactly this issue.

      [citation needed]

      \

      Organic food is not inherently superior from a taste or health perspective. However, small-scale farming inherently better lends itself to producing tasty, healthy food, because there is less pressure to produce inferior varietals designed for shelf-readiness, and most organic farming is done on a smaller scale. Large-scale organic farming is only inherently less harmful to the environment; still desirable, but you won't see the results in your supermarket.

      Furthermore, it's bad from an environmental perspective because it requires more farmland,

      No. What requires more farmland is growing monocultures to enable machine cultivation, when plants grow best in "guilds" of plants which have different soil requirements and which may actually feed their "companion plants", e.g. by fixing nitrogen in the soil in a bio-available form. This is why the only monocultures you see in nature are plants which render the environment inhospitable for others species, like redwoods (even there you see bay laurel), pines, or some flowering tropical bushes.

      By far, the most efficient gardening is true organic farming (not bullshit USDA organic, but actually representing cyclical systems in which soil health and community health are understood to be related) in which plants are grown in guilds. It is simply not efficient to cultivate, which is a problem which will eventually be solved with robotics but which remains viable at the farmer's market level.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Well.. by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Note that I made the uncontroversial statement that produce picked fresh from my garden tastes better than produce that has been sitting around for weeks in a big box grocery store. Also note that there are two opposing opinions to this view. Perhaps I should not trust my own sensory input and substitute the view of random posters on Slashdot as my truth.

      Not bloody likely, Trolls.

    37. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote>Wash anything you eat raw, it's common sense.

      But why would I give a shit about washing the food you eat? I'm still getting paid $15.00 an hour, the less I care and the less I do at work, the greater a value it is for me. And why the fuck do I care about washing my hands? I'm just here to do the least amount of work while drawing a steady paycheck, so fuck all of you.

    38. Re:Well.. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      See the studies on this page for measured differences between the types of eggs.

      http://www.motherearthnews.com...

      The risk of organic spinich is about the same as conventional spinach

      "But Francisco Diez-Gonzalez, a professor of food safety microbiology at the University of Minnesota's department of food science and nutrition, disagrees. In 2006, he published a study comparing E. coli contamination in organic and conventional produce. He concluded that the presence of E. coli seemed to depend more on the type of produce than whether it had been grown conventionally or organically.

      "At this timeâ¦there is no sufficient evidence either epidemiological or scientific, to support the idea that organic produce is most likely to carry foodborne pathogenic bacteria," wrote Diez-Gonzalez in an email. "Despite the apparently logical expectation that if manure is used as one of the predominant fertilizers for organic crops they might be riskier, some factors such as the diversity of manure types, the use of composted manure and the fact that even conventional growers also use manure seem to have an impact on finding any differences."

      The takeaway: Since organic produce isn't any more or less likely than conventional to carry a scary disease, and since even organic fruits and veggies might contain traces of pesticides on their skins, always wash it, just like you would any other produce. Of course, rinsing your food won't always remove every single pathogen, Lunder notes, but it's better than nothing. Since running some water over my blueberries will require approximately 15 seconds of my day, I think I can handle it."

      The specific studies you posted are interesting and may be valid. However, you have to be careful of any iinformation associated with the Center for Global Food Issues. It's funded by Monsanto, ConAgra, and DuPont. Enough of articles I dug into turned out to have funding ties to big agra that I've become skeptical of anti-organic science.

      The big food processors spend 20 million a year to produce anti-organic propaganda and have bought up most of the mid sized organic food producers. It's a bad situation where real organic food is hard to find and it's hard to find certifying agencies you can trust because certification agencies are targeted by the big food processors and they have a lot of money to throw around. USDA organic and free range certification is almost useless at this point.

      Interesting point on the marigolds, but so far I've seen no scandal of producers specifically feeding marigolds to chickens to color the eggs. But I imagine that's next. They'd rather dye the yolks than actually follow real free range and organic processes.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    39. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the way the E.Coli gets into the plants in the first place is via animals shitting on the produce, right?

      Yeah animals. Heh.Technically true.

    40. Re: Well.. by Ahnahmoley · · Score: 1

      You're so wrong I don't know where to begin. Background: RN, meaning I know a little bit about health. Lifelong struggle with allergies because genetics. For example, I'm allergic to all cillins, mycins, and sporins. If I get sick, there's almost nothing they can prescribe for me. I am sensitive to so many chemicals that switching to organic changed my life. I have never had your fear based outbreak and have a higher quality of life. It's not my religion. I don't preach Organic. I use it so I don't get upset stomach and random illnesses because my body isn't built to handle the chemicals. It's cool. You rant on and live your life. I hear ignorance makes you happier.

    41. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      See the studies on this page for measured differences between the types of eggs.

      http://www.motherearthnews.com...

      What a spammy, biased site. First of all, just about everything on that site falls afoul of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Second of all, they don't have any kind of whitepaper or anything, just some unsubstantiated claims. Show me some peer reviewed evidence, with a clearly drawn cause and effect. Third of all, I've seen sites like this all the time, e.g. naturalnews.com, mercola.com, etc. They make these stupid wild claims with no scientific evidence and use "because it's natural" as their proof. (They also seem to attract a lot of conspiracy theorist types, electromagnetic hypersensitivity believers, anti-vaxers, etc, but that's another topic.)

      The risk of organic spinich is about the same as conventional spinach

      "But Francisco Diez-Gonzalez, a professor of food safety microbiology at the University of Minnesota's department of food science and nutrition, disagrees. In 2006, he published a study comparing E. coli contamination in organic and conventional produce. He concluded that the presence of E. coli seemed to depend more on the type of produce than whether it had been grown conventionally or organically.

      "At this timeâ¦there is no sufficient evidence either epidemiological or scientific, to support the idea that organic produce is most likely to carry foodborne pathogenic bacteria," wrote Diez-Gonzalez in an email. ....

      Oh look, another spammy "natural is better" site! You pulled this straight from organicconsumers.org, no way that's biased! At least we have some scientific investigation going this time, which is an improvement over your previous "becuz mother earth sez!" article.

      Well guess what, here's a less biased site, and it sheds a better light on the issue, specifically mentioning Professor Francisco Diez-Gonzalez:

      A new study on food safety reveals that organic produce may contain a significantly higher risk of fecal contamination than conventionally grown produce.

      A recent comparative analysis of organic produce versus conventional produce from the University of Minnesota shows that the organically grown produce had 9.7 percent positive samples for the presence of generic E. coli bacteria versus only 1.6 percent for conventional produce on farms in Minnesota.

      The study, which was published in May in the Journal of Food Protection, concluded, "the observation that the prevalence of E. coli was significantly higher in organic produce supports the idea that organic produce is more susceptible to fecal contamination."

      In addition, the study found the food-borne disease pathogen salmonella only on the organic produce samples. There was no evidence found of the deadly strain of bacteria, E. coli O157:H7, in either type of produce tested. The study looked at fruits and vegetables at the "preharvest" stage, not at the retail store level.

      The principle investigator of the University of Minnesota study, Francisco Diez-Gonzalez, told CNSNews.com that "organic agriculture was more susceptible to carry fecal indicators."

      "In many ways it is confirming what is believed, indeed, if you are using animal manure for fertilizer, the chances that you are going to get fecal bacteria on the product are greater," Diez-Gonzalez said.

      Now granted, he goes on later to contradict himself somewhat, but if you read further on, a few more experts chime in and confirm everything mentioned above.

      Alex Avery, director of research and education at the free-market Hudson Institute's Center for Global Food Issues, says the latest scientific study confirms years of research that organic produce may pose a higher risk for food-borne i

    42. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presenting the argument that fresh-picked food is better tasting in response to someone saying "organic food [is] NOT beneficial from either a taste or health perspective" makes it seem like you're refuting his argument by comparing your fresh-picked, small-grower organic produce to standard mass-produced, long-distance shipped conventional produce - implying that you think that it's the conventional/organic distinction which is causing that.

      That's not the argument at all. Fresh-picked, small-grower conventional produce is going to taste about the same as fresh-picked, small-grower organic produce. Mass-produced organic produce shipped cross-country is going to taste about the same as mass-produced conventional produce shipped across country. It's the fresh-picked, small-grower versus mass-produced, cross-country shipped difference which is critical to the taste difference, not the conventional/organic one.

      Feel free to prefer produce from your garden or from local farmers - I know I do. Don't, however, conclude that because vegetables from your organic garden taste better than conventional vegetables from the big box supermarket that it's the organic/conventional distinction that's doing it. Correlation is not causation, and all that. Also keep in mind that you're in a discussion about a nationwide chain of restaurants, and how exceedingly unlikely it is for them to source their produce from backyard farmers. They're going to go to mass-market growers, with all the issues (independent of organic/conventional!) that entails.

    43. Re:Well.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Fresher tastes better. When you buy veggies from the store, it's typically well after they've been picked or whatever. Stuff out of your garden is nice and fresh, and tastes better.

      I often buy organic produce because it tastes better. I suspect that what's going on is that the organic stuff spends less time sitting around before I eat it. I really, really doubt that one artificial method like organic produces better taste and healthiness than another artificial method.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    44. Re:Well.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Fresher tastes better. When you buy veggies from the store, it's typically well after they've been picked or whatever. Stuff out of your garden is nice and fresh, and tastes better.

      That will depend on how good of a gardener you are and whether or not the place you live in has both the optimal weather and soil conditions for whatever it is you're trying to grow.

      I often buy organic produce because it tastes better. I suspect that what's going on is that the organic stuff spends less time sitting around before I eat it.

      That's typically not the case. Most organic food comes from large companies like ConAgra, and will be shipped around quite a bit. In addition, organic actually has a slight disadvantage here because you have to rely almost entirely on packaging in order to preserve it.

    45. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU HAVE TO TEST FOR HUMAN DNA IN FOOD, FOOLS! HUMAN DNA. CANNIBALS HAVE THE WAY OF THEIR LIFE IN ALL FAST FOOD CHAINS. I am so harmed by the last sauce I did not ask in a quesarito that I am feeling nausea sometimes when in front a computer and definitely look older by a decade after three damned miserable DOLLAR-PAID TACOS.

    46. Re:Well.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The soil is good, and I'm a terrible gardener.

      For whatever reason, some (not all) of the organic produce at the grocery store tastes significantly better than the non-organic. I don't taste much if any difference in the carrots, but the celery is significantly different. I suspect that the organic celery is fresher than the organic carrots. The practice of growing tomatoes in an artificial environment and getting them to the store with the vine on improved the taste dramatically.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    47. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a produce food safety consultant and I've been on hundreds of farms, both organic and conventional. In the leafy green industry both organic and conventional farms often use manure based composts as nitrogen sources and to improve soil structure. The USDA National Organic Program has detailed specifications for preparation of those composts so that fecal bacteria are eliminated during the composting process. The Leafy Green Marketing Agreement has adopted those specifications for preparation of composts and so they are generally used by both organic and conventional growers. Organic and conventional are such broad categories that it is difficult to make generalizations or direct comparisons. In my experience, organic farmers appropriate fewer resources to food safety than do conventional growers. But that may be more because they are small than that they are organic. My view is that both organic and conventional produce can be grown safely, but it is not easy. It takes resources, commitment and knowledge.

  2. Interesting idea by slazzy · · Score: 1

    Glad to hear they are trying something different. I am just recovering from a so called food-born-illness from a different restaurant and it was sure nasty. Stuck on the toilet with a bucket for puking for over 12 hours is not pleasant nor are the days after.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    1. Re:Interesting idea by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Score: -5, too much information.

    2. Re:Interesting idea by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Stuck on the toilet with a bucket for puking for over 12 hours is not pleasant nor are the days after.

      Geez, that sounds more like you were possessed by Satan than food-borne illness.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I can top that. I contracted Norwalk virus once. I now know what it feels like to be a garden hose run over by a speeding dumptruck because I had to violently empty myself from both ends simultaneously, multiple times. I puked and shat with such force and frequency I literally pulled muscles--muscles I never knew I even had. Two days later I was well enough to do a nasty job. Ever shit so strongly that you spashed your shirt? Well I don't know if it was puke or poop and it probably didn't matter much which end it came from, but I had to do it. I had to clean "former intestinal fluids of imprecise origins" off of the bathroom ceiling.

      posting as AC for obvious reasons.

    4. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, be thankful you have never experienced serious food poisoning. I wasn't in the bathroom for 12 hours like the OP, but probably 5 hours. I've never been that sick before or since. As I was laying on the bathroom floor, in between vomiting and shitting, it was easy to understand how this stuff kills people. Actually, shitting is the wrong word. A torrent of clear water (ok, let's just call it liquid) was coming out of my asshole. I was like a human fire hydrant.

      Yeah, I didn't feel right for at least a week or so after that. Bad stuff.

    5. Re:Interesting idea by BKX · · Score: 1

      If poopreport was still around, I'd beg you to write that story up. Hell, I'm begging you now. Add some fluffy descriptors, a few juicy details, describe the meal that caused it, and little of the aftermath. It'd be great. Reply with a link to a blogpost or something, please.

    6. Re:Interesting idea by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      You got off lightly, Food poisoning caused me to be ill/puking for 4+ weeks with potential long term effects.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    7. Re:Interesting idea by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Wait until you get botulism. No, not the food poisoning that you're sick from for a half a day but the kind where you spend days (or weeks) in the hospital and it takes six or more months to feel well again. I'll spare you the details but, if you want, you can count yourself lucky as it could have been much, much worse.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Interesting idea by KGIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      Botulism? When you're shitting bile and blood, projectile shitting at times, it's pretty rough. They have a treatment for it, I've undergone it, where they basically increase your immunity by feeding you small amounts of botulism on crackers. It's a strange process but once you've had botulism then you'll be more susceptible to it in the future. The treatment was fairly new when I went through it (it was my second bout with it) and they're able to build the resistance back up over time with the smaller doses.

      In an earlier post, I mentioned that I'd spare the details of botulism for those who have never had it. I still will as not even *I* have words enough to describe it. Unless things have changed, the leading cause of death (and botulism is *very* deadly - even in intensive care units) is because of the stress from evacuating your alimentary canal causes your heart to rupture. Yes, you puke (even without anything coming out) or shit (again, with nothing except maybe some intestinal wall tissue, white milky liquid, and yellow bile forced from your system coming out) so forcefully that your heart explodes.

      So, that - the above description - *is* sparing them the details. You will be months, years even, getting to the point where you're well again and you may never be fully well again. I can now eat honey and chicken again and I'm usually only worried about the chicken and I tend to avoid it unless I am damned sure of the cooking process. I consume a little honey every day (that I remember) in order to help keep my resistance up. Do *not* give young children honey!

      There are other sources for botulism but those are the two primary sources. The effects of botulism are beyond my ability to type. There are few things on this planet that are truly worse than death, botulism is one of them. Botulism doesn't mean you were ill and threw up a little after dinner. Botulism means you nearly died.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:Interesting idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Geez, that sounds more like you were possessed by Satan than food-borne illness.

      I got food poisoning at a beer&bbq festival this last season and spend the next six hours vomiting violently. There was an hour or two in a park, vomiting under a plant. Then two hours' ride home in the back of the van, desperately clutching a bucket and occasionally moaning in pain. Then another three hours spent with the toilet. It was literally one of the worst experiences of my life. I didn't wish I would die, but a coma would have been welcome. Breaking my finger was more fun.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds considerably worse than my food poisoning, just puking (although empty) for weeks, doc gave me anti-puke tablets which just delayed the inevitable, and the poisoning made me clumsy and disorientated like a drunk person.

      - MrL0g1c

  3. Just what I want, to be swabbed before eating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now on to the federal DNA database, and then to Russian hackers everywhere!

  4. Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Contaminated produce because it was picked by illegals who literally shit in the field and wipe their ass with lettuce.

    1. Re:Calling it by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      or "night soil" as fertilizer in the Orient

    2. Re: Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Repu Lucan formers won't allow them to have bathrooms.

    3. Re: Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is how they be.

    4. Re: Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. You're claiming that Republican lie is true. That doesn't happen.

    5. Re: Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't want the poor in general to have bathrooms.

    6. Re: Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fight against government-provided sewage. They want us all to have to shit in the streets.

    7. Re: Calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans don't want the poor to have bathrooms.

    8. Re: Calling it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      No, Republicans are working to weaponize Chipotle vegetables to use against ISIS.

  5. If the Tepublicans would allow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    government to work, this wouldn't happen.

    1. Re: If the Tepublicans would allow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't believe government works and spend their lives trying to prove that.

    2. Re: If the Tepublicans would allow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They hate humanity and want us to get sick.

    3. Re: If the Tepublicans would allow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why they're systematically destroying municipal water systems.

    4. Re: If the Tepublicans would allow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The medical cartel gets so rich off of this. So rich.

    5. Re: If the Tepublicans would allow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why doctors fight so hard to cause food poisoning.

  6. Sounds like buzzword marketing. by fred911 · · Score: 1

    Can someone please explain how genetic status relates to a bacterial contamination? WTF?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Sounds like buzzword marketing. by stevez67 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They take a sample, extract all of the DNA, analyze it for sequences that are only found in pathogens, reject any lots of produce that carry pathogen sequences. The USDA requires a similar test on meat products like hamburger. The world needs a lot less wtf and more scientific literacy.

    2. Re:Sounds like buzzword marketing. by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The truly effective method would include not only banning lots that carry it, but publicly identifying the source, and after a couple such lots, dropping that supplier permanently (and announcing it). Once supplying infected stock becomes a business-ending practice, suppliers will become a lot more careful themselves, which is what is truly needed here.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    3. Re:Sounds like buzzword marketing. by thesupraman · · Score: 0

      Ok, so, what happens if their one sample is taken 5 mm from where the bacteria in question is?

      You do understand that such bacteria are not a continuous coating over all surfaces of the food, right?

      This is just companies learning from your wonderful government.

      People have accepted security theater, this is just health safety theater. Impress people with advanced sounding
      technology (DNA testing! yes, really, they will use that well known library of evil bacteria DNA library.. oh wait, that doesnt exist).

      Wont make one scrap of difference. After all, improved washing, and communicating to your customers that no food can be
      made perfectly safe, so sometimes things will happen, both hit profits! than simple cannot be allowed.

      Luckily the shepple are so indoctrinated these days they dare not even try and actually think about such things, so it will work...

    4. Re:Sounds like buzzword marketing. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This wouldn't even be an issue if not for our methods of food handling. We process foods in massive batches which lend themselves to cross-contamination. Chipotle is just one of the zillions of "restaurants" which exemplify this mass shoveling approach to food.

      What is needed is more local production, this is especially possible with greens because they are easy to produce hydroponically in "vertical gardens".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Will this help with norovirus? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    What if any will this do to prevent a recurrence of the norovirus illness that sickened 141 Boston College students who ate at Chipotle?

  8. Wrong test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Test for shit. e coli is shit.

    Is it really easier to DNA test plants than to keep the shit out of the food?

    It maybe easier, but DNA testing will not eliminate the shit that is in the food.

    This is not a solution, it's PR.

    Idea- put the DNA testing money, and the PR budget into KEEPING SHIT OUT OF FOOD

  9. Food Irradiation by schmaustech · · Score: 4, Informative

    This could all be avoided by simple food irradiation. However most Americans are too ignorant to understand this.

    1. Re:Food Irradiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the scientifically illiterate demographic Chipotle is marketing to, I doubt that's likely to happen. Irradiation sounds almost as scary as 'genetically modified.' Hey, at least that food borne illness is all natural and runs no risk of those dreaded 'unknowable side effects.'

    2. Re:Food Irradiation by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Mod partent up!

    3. Re:Food Irradiation by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on what you call it. No one bats an eye about "cellulose" as a "non-nutritive filler" (a.k.a. sawdust), so if you have the right name, irradiated foods should also be accepted.

      How about something like, "Photon Pasteurized"

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Food Irradiation by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Alpha/Beta Particle Washed?

    5. Re:Food Irradiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm, Irradiated Cram.

    6. Re:Food Irradiation by freeze128 · · Score: 0

      One of the ingredients in Taco Bell's ground beef is "silicon dioxide".

      Sand... Yummy.

    7. Re:Food Irradiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, because mutant superhero bacteria will be much better than what we have now... ?

    8. Re:Food Irradiation by samwichse · · Score: 1

      It's an anti-caking agent used in many spices. They probably aren't adding it to the meat directly, but as part of some pre-mixed dry spice package. It's absolutely harmless and inert, and even marketed for home use:
      https://www.americanspice.com/...

      Sam

    9. Re:Food Irradiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you irradiate food, suppliers will become careless. After a while, most processed foods will contain irradiated poop. It (probably) won't make you sick, since it's irradiated, but is that really the future you want?

    10. Re:Food Irradiation by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Gamma-enhanced?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:Food Irradiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeScale has introduced a rf cooking method using their cell phone transmit amps. http://www.nxp.com/products/rf/rf-sage:RF-SAGE-PG?uc=true&site_preference=mobile

      Any chance that this process could be used like irradiation to kill food pathogens?

  10. Check short positions for possible causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone see how high this trades for? It's trading for $565 a share (off an August high of $745). Still looks prime for a selloff.

  11. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The feds could start fining farmers for hiring illegals. If no one is willing to work for those wages then produce prices are artificially low and need adjusted.

  12. Irradiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would end E. Coli ... But the chances of getting past american phobias seem small.

  13. field contamination can be wind or water borne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In most cases, the field contamination is from adjacent fields, wild animals, or even water borne, not from the field workers.
    That notorious contaminated spinach thing from a few years ago is a good example.

    What you need is to consume this stuff regularly, so you build up a tolerance to the strains that occur locally.

  14. INdustry norms are terrible to begin with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ooh, above industry norms... is that like what... having any standards at all... pfft... don't eat out in America. It's all unhealthy garbage anyways.

  15. MOD PARENT UP by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I know it isn't considered acceptable to mock republicans here on slashdot, but that is funny, there. I'm even eating right now and that was funny...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I know it isn't considered acceptable to mock republicans here on slashdot ...

      Why not? Even republicans are shaking their collective heads over their presidential candidates. Trump (and to a lesser extend Carson) are like untreated venereal diseases - the "gift" that keeps on giving.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I know it isn't considered acceptable to mock republicans here on slashdot ...

      Why not?
      Because republicans are in the numeric majority here on slashdot, and they have almost no sense of humor.

      If you doubt me, try this. First, make a joke about JFK or Bill Clinton and infidelity; see how many democrats laugh. Then make a joke about Reagan having had no idea what was going on since 1985, and see that not a single republican laughs.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it isn't considered acceptable to mock republicans here on slashdot

      What the hell slashdot are YOU reading?

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by njnnja · · Score: 1

      Or maybe that just means that sex is a better topic to joke about than Alzheimer's disease?

      Of course, most slashdotters don't have any experience with either *rim shot*! Thank you, I'll be here all week.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I doubt republicans are the majority on slashdot - just that they tend to make more noise.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:MOD PARENT UP by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I doubt republicans are the majority on slashdot - just that they tend to make more noise.

      Slashdot certainly treats the republicans as the majority here, based on how often front-page stories cater to them and how often ads on the website cater to their causes. I agree that they undoubtedly make more noise than any other political faction. I would think that if slashdot was so woefully inaccurately estimating their audience there would have been some blowback by now... if there is any group that outnumbers the republicans here I would say it could only be the unconcerned unaffiliated. The democrats are a small minority here at best.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  16. Chipotle: If SJW's ran a restaraunt by sethstorm · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's trendy food, but it's toxic to anyone handling it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  17. Re:Chipotle and Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps there is a subtle difference you are missing between throwing out vegetables and throwing out people. Kind of in the way that killing people is considered a crime but picking plants is not really frowned upon. I even eat the things regularly.

    However, I am really quite impressed in how you managed to justify the recreation of third reich by drawing an analogy with the treatment of vegetables. The circularness and inhumanity of this logic is nearly infallible.

  18. Won't help as long as the stores aren't up to code by forevermore · · Score: 1

    Given that at least 2 of the Seattle-area restaurants were immediately shut down again by the health department for health code violations, this is beyond ingredient suppliers -- they need to hire managers who actually pay attention to what their employees aren't doing (e.g. washing hands, keeping food hot/cold enough, etc).

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
  19. Unknown States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was sickened with possible E-coli after eating at Chipotle in Northwest Arkansas. I remember that the guacamole had a funny taste... like it was made with spoiled eggs... but I ate it anyway like a fool. The resulting food poisoning made me sick to my stomach and eventually sh*t my pants, multiple times, the first one being at work. My roommate had to bring fresh pants and take me home... I was very embarrassed and I'm glad my coworkers haven't tormented me about it. This was just before the first instance of reported food poisoning in restaurants in California and Minnesota this summer.

    I remember calling the restaurant I went to and letting them know I might have gotten sick eating there. A few minutes later I received a call from Chipotle headquarters wanting to know more about it and reporting that they hadn't had any other instance of food poisoning from that restaurant.

    It could be by chance, but considering how far this has gone and how many states have been reported affected by this, I'd have to say it's a supply chain issue and has absolutely nothing to do with what state you're eating in.

    Don't eat at Chipotle, you'll get sick! They need to be shut down if they can't fix this. (Conversely, if you like to invest, now is the best time to buy their stock... I don't care, just don't eat there.)

  20. Re:Chipotle and Muslims by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Except that it's not a mere case of throwing out vegetables. It's a case of causing heavy losses to people and affecting the livelihoods of many people in the 'food chain' here - those who work in the farms involved, those who work in the stores, those who work in the restaurants, et al. A whole lot of people who don't get paid, or risk losing their jobs when something like this happens.

    But congratulations on the shrill bleeding-heart reaction to anything that suggests that Muslims are anything but innocent dandelions all persecuted by the EEEVVVVILLLLL White Guys.

  21. Amateur night at supply chain management school by kriston · · Score: 1

    It's amateur night at supply chain management school.

    Please, don't insult us. Chipotle management screwed up in their abortive quest to use the Chipotle chain to finance their big dreams of creating a gourmet restaurant chain.

    They never intended to keep the Chipotle brand around after they achieved their dream, but it never happened, and now we have lots of people with puke bugs.

    Details here:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --

    Kriston

  22. More stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More stupidity in this discussion, too. The experts aren't even sure where the contamination is coming from, but that doesn't stop you people from declaring 'It HAS to be such-and-such'. What a bunch of bullshit. How about you all go back to arguing about politics or religion or something and leave the science to the people who actually know what they're doing and actually have access to the situation, k?

  23. Re:Won't help as long as the stores aren't up to c by BKX · · Score: 1

    Having worked in a restaurant, I can tell you those places must have been doing some nightmarish shit. The company I work for has only been shut down once (years ago) because mouse turds were found on a slicer, not in use, which is pretty damn egregious if you ask me, but not as serious as people would expect. That manager and employee were both fired. Anything less just gets you yelled at and, maybe, if it's really bad, you'll have to throw away some product. We were once forced to throw out an entire cooler of meat (more than 500 lbs) because the cooler was holding at 42 degrees F. 41 is the limit. That's the exception though. The rule is a good talking to. Having said that, restaurants are usually scared shitless of the health department, and generally keep things safe. An outbreak of norovirus or e coli is a death sentence (Jack-in-the-Box, Blimpie (in GR, MI, anyway)), so restaurants have a pretty big incentive to keep things clean and at temp.

  24. I doubt it by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    I got very sick after eating at Chipotle nearly 10 years ago. The occurrences of illness have only increased since then. It could have been due to poor worker sanitation, or maybe E. Coli, but either way, I haven't eaten there since, and I don't plan to eat there again ever.

    Steve Ells has apologized for the illness. So what. Steve, you can stuff your sorrys in a sack!

  25. Call me paranoid but this was industrial espionage by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 1

    The E. coli outbreak is targeted at the company loudest about antibiotic free, additive free, non-GMO foods. The things Chipotle was doing were causing waves in the restaurant and agriculture businesses that one or more players didn't like. This E. coli outbreak has set that back years, people now question whether it was the right move by Chipotle. If they looked they will find this started as a crime.

  26. Simples: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He also says companies should just accept that they would be selling less secure products."

  27. Do "ecological" or "biodynamic" instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Organic was never without toxins anyways.

  28. Re: Call me paranoid but this was industrial espio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ding. Ding. Ding. Ding. We have a winner.

    They were the loudest company to announce that they were abandoning GMOs. And then this happens. Funny how that works.

  29. better idea, just blame SPAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just do like ze germanz did, just blame spain. Pretend we cultivate our stuff in fecal waters because we are "ze inferior race" and not using your wolkswaggen magical futuristic machinery and be done with it. You yankees just need to change ww for something american, like, ford or... dupont maybe?

    anyway, if the blame of spain is too foreign you can use mexico, our (rapist) cholo cousins wont give a fuck either

    chíngale!!

  30. Pack it in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are done not one outbreak but many and different types.

  31. Re:Call me paranoid but this was industrial espion by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Really? I mean, yeah, really? Do you have *any* evidence to support that claim or is just just a presumption because "it's obvious if you look at it right?" 'Cause I'm thinking you're a bit crazy. Big Agriculture, such as it exists, isn't going to (probably) go out and intentionally poison a bunch of people when they can sell organic foods at a much higher profit percentage. They're not going to risk that kind of fallout should they be discovered. There's no darkened walnut-lined room with a giant oaken table and antique leather chairs.

    I mean, really? C'mon now, you might just as well say it was due to aliens. Unless, of course, you have some evidence... Do you have any evidence? Does the lack of evidence give weight to your conclusions in your mind?

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  32. Re:Won't help as long as the stores aren't up to c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nanny state socialism. If 42 degrees really means illness, then people won't go there again. Viola, the magic of the market to the rescue again!
    --
    roman_mir

  33. Re:Won't help as long as the stores aren't up to c by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That's the exception though. The rule is a good talking to. Having said that, restaurants are usually scared shitless of the health department, and generally keep things safe.

    Eh. Tons of restaurants don't. I've got food poisoning a ton after going out. And I've heard all the scare stories. We've got a sports bar here in Kelseyville where one of my friends worked for a moment, and they are horrible about food handling and break every rule. They're still open years later.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  34. Re:Call me paranoid but this was industrial espion by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    The moon landings were faked too. If you have a powerful enough telescope you can actually look at where they supposedly landed on the moon and left the rover and LEM. But you know what those placed look like - an abandoned sound stage. You take a photograph of the moon at high enough resolution and you can see the remains of a camera and lightning boom. Not the LEM or rover - the debris is the wrong shape. It exactly matches the lighting equipment used in the 60s on TV sets. Filmed. Right there. Fake as can be. They even left the set trash.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  35. Re:Call me paranoid but this was industrial espion by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I must confess... I've looked at the moon through a high-powered telescope (there's an observatory at Kents Hill) and I did not see any evidence of the moon landings! I've seen the lack of evidence with my own eyes! They must be faked!

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  36. Chipotle has idiots in charge. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    All you need to do is a standard Gram test. less than $0.08 cost per test and can be done in their own lab easily

    What the fuck is wrong with these executives? full blown DNA test? why don't they also perform a full gas chromatograph as well?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  37. It's pricing, mislabeling and pesticides... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Grocery stores buy at lowest price and sell at what market will bear.
    They are usually buying from large chain suppliers who in turn often import.
    They too look to buy low and sell high. And they also buy from producers and suppliers who do the same.
    And if ANY link in the supply chain mislabels their produce in order to get a better price...

    The other thing is... all that food being shipped and left sitting there in the store for days means pest control.
    Or roaches and rats munching on your produce.
    And that means pesticides. Applied IN STORE by people who have no clue of dosage or which pesticides should be applied. Couple of cans or RAID? Why not?

    That's why there are no differences in taste in "organic" vs. "regular" FARMED food - but people buying in supermarkets still complain about the taste.
    Send them to a farmers market and they'll happily buy and eat pesticide sprayed and GMO produce thinking it's "organic" - cause farmers know what "time to harvest" is for and cause their produce is FRESH.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:It's pricing, mislabeling and pesticides... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Send them to a farmers market and they'll happily buy and eat pesticide sprayed and GMO produce thinking it's "organic" - cause farmers know what "time to harvest" is for and cause their produce is FRESH.

      There is an episode of Penn and Teller where they did exactly that, (AND at a farmer's market, with you know, you're vaunted "fresh" food) with a blind test, and they asked people who believed in the whole "organic tastes better" to try two different foods and ask which tasted better. 7 out of 10 of them identified the conventional farmed food as tasting better. Granted it's a small sample so not very scientific, but the show is intended to entertain. Still, it reflects similar scientific tests that have reached the same conclusion.

      Here, watch the whole thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Another thing they did (not in the above linked video) was place two banana halves on a table and tell a lady that one was organic and one wasn't, and ask her which one tasted better. She talked about how the organic one tasted much creamer and much more like a banana, and the non-organic one tasted plain. Then it was revealed to her that they were two halves of the same banana.

      Organic food is a religion. Plain and simple. There is zero evidence that it tastes better or is healthier other than a lot of bullshit anecdotes that people push around.

  38. Organic Troubles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing hard to believe here is that it took this long for organic produce to develop problems.

    Organic produce is grown in organic fertilizer, which is dung. Ecoli and noro virus are spread by dung. Although irradiated food can carry the organic label, most produced do not irradiate because is clearly goes against the 'all natural' vibe that their customers desire.

    Conclusion: Organic may be 'environmentally sustainable', but there are other ways that it is not sustainable.

  39. Third world scum infecting America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Third world MEXICANS who don't bother washing their hands after going to the toilet - THAT is what is to blame for this. As usual, 'political correctness' kills people. Thank your Jewish 'masters' for all of this shit.

  40. Was caused by Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who Forced illegal undocumented guest workers to fertilize their fields with Human excrement from said guest workers rather than picking their own crops. Solution is simple. Force crackers to work the fields. We will then take all the poor undocumented guest workers and put them into positions of power such as media moguls, and congressmen.

    I am thinking that when this happens we can finally fix the immigration crisis. The proud latino race, when they are in charge would never allow their own country to be taken over by a bunch of undocumented immigrants. Only crackers and niggers are that stupid. Latinos stick together. Crackers and Niggers just fight amongst themselves and spend all their time worrying about who is the most privileged / discriminated against.

    1. Re:Was caused by Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by your post you spics are no different. Not much difference between crackers, niggers, and spics and those differences are racially based so all three have one thing in common, they're all fucktarded trash.

  41. Reminded me of this: by Threni · · Score: 1

    http://www.stilldrinking.org/c...

    ( Amusing blog. Another good one is this:

    http://www.stilldrinking.org/p... )

  42. Dear USA - This is capitalism at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The e-coli outbreaks happen because of greed, an inherent problem with capitalism as all business owners are greedy as they don't give a fuck about anything but getting a profit even if the sheeple get sick. The solution is simple, communism. That's right boys and girls, communism. With communism this shit would not happen but since the fucktarded USians are brainwashed into thinking the free market will solve everything they will keep getting ill from eating tainted food shoveled in their face by greedy business owners while every other country will not have this problem even with organic farming.

    Sincerely,

    Signed: The rest of the world

    1. Re: Dear USA - This is capitalism at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your facts, tard-boy. Communism starved millions of people to death.

  43. Re:Won't help as long as the stores aren't up to c by archivis · · Score: 1

    Food poisoning can kill people.

    --
    In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
  44. Not religion. by denzacar · · Score: 1
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  45. Re: Call me paranoid but this was industrial espio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just leave this here:

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Monsanto,_Agent_Orange,_Dioxins_and_Plan_Colombia

    Where is your moral outrage and righteous indignation now?

  46. Re: Call me paranoid but this was industrial espio by KGIII · · Score: 1

    You link to something not even remotely related and then parrot a pithy saying at the end that also has no bearing on the conversation at hand. Insanity isn't curable, that we know of, but there's help available. Yes, Monsanto has done some evil things. Yes, they're probably still doing evil things. No, they're not intentionally poisoning a supply line for a restaurant.

    The quizzical thing is that you seem to think that I've some moral outrage or righteous indignation. No, that would apply to the GGP post where they indicated that they were outraged and indignant. I'm at the opposite end, apathetic and mildly curious about the mental state of the poster. The insanity behind the people who think there's a giant conspiracy everywhere is just astounding.

    I do know why scientists believe they do it, however. See, it's an ego thing. It's usually people with lower-than usual self-esteem and below-average IQs that believe in conspiracy theories. They do this because it makes them feel better. It makes them feel smart. See, they're "in the know." They're the wise, the people able to see between the lines, and everyone else is too stupid to get it. It's about inferiority and lack of intelligence that makes them believe these things. It's quite the opposite of what they think others are seeing.

    It was an interesting paper. I enjoyed reading it but I still find the actual mental process confusing. I'm just not able to grasp what it's like to feel that poorly about oneself and I'd hate to be at that level of intellect. It would be like being able to read but unable to understand, or so I imagine.

    There are bad people doing bad things but, odds are, it's not some giant corporation that's worried about a trivial fast food franchise and their trendy foods. They're not a threat, even if they do catch on. If Monsanto can make money selling organics (and they probably do) then they're going to do that instead. They're not worried about GMO being less popular with some because they are already in the market and the market's not going anywhere.

    Why do I explain all of this? Well, because you might be the original AC and you might be in need of help. Think carefully about what I've said. I'm a fairly reputable person with a fairly decent group of contacts - some of whom are here on this very sight. I'm not some sort of Monsanto "shill" nor do I own any stock in their company (to the best of my knowledge). I have nothing to gain from posting this. I have nothing to lose from your mad ravings.

    I do, however, have a vested interest in being a catalyst for change. If this post makes you examine the thought pattern you're using and realize that you're trying to make the extraordinary ordinary then I've done my job and that will make me feel better about who I am and it will, maybe, help you see that the answer isn't usually the most complex one that you can come up with even if it makes you feel good or feel like you've posted something intelligent.

    It matters to me because I care. I care about my fellow humans. I want to help them think logically when I can. I want them to do smart things and accomplish great things. I want them to be happy, free, and thinking. If I can help that, even just a little bit, then I get the chance to think that I might have improved the world just a little bit. Seriously, someone's shitting on the food. There's no conspiracy here unless you've got some evidence. Agent Orange is not evidence.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  47. Just include free chipotle-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just include free chipotle-away with every burrito to remove those stubborn bloody diarrhea stains from their customer's underwear.

  48. Shitty /. editors, big surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But food safety experts are mixed about the effectiveness of such screening efforts

    Are the experts mixed, like perhaps, a salad with e. coli-containing lettuce, or are their opinions mixed?

  49. Re:Call me paranoid but this was industrial espion by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Yeah. The reason they ended the Apollo program was a contract dispute about the planet, about 300 light-years away, that we were using to stage the moon landings.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  50. Proves my point by sursurrus · · Score: 1

    For years I vetoed Chipotle when my friends wanted to go there. It is utter, bland, mediocrity -- the Olive Garden of casual Mexican, if you will. Far, far too much of day-to-day operations is left to employees, if you're lucky they will be older Latina women who put out so-so food... if you're not, it'll be teenagers giving you lettuce stems and dehydrated (but responsibly sourced!) Chicken.

    IMO foodborne pathogen outbreaks take a fair amount of carelessness - either in the way the item is sourced or the way its handled. Since I live in one of the affected states, my snobbiness about Chipotle may have kept me out of the hospital!

    Fuck you Steve Ells, douchebag fuck!

  51. organics by prof_robinson · · Score: 0

    This is the #1 problem with organic food that no one talks about: e coli. Almost all of the e coli outbreaks are from organic food...that's what happens when you use sht for fertilizer - and that's exactly why we switched to chemicals in the first place.

  52. Chipotle: If SJW's ran a restaurant by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The food's trendy, but it's toxic on contact.

    (Laughing at mods that blew their modpoints on the first round)

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.