Slashdot Mirror


Software Error Releases Up To 3,200 Inmates Early (seattletimes.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Governor Jay Inslee announced Tuesday that software used by the Washington Department of Corrections has been making mistakes in calculating sentences since 2002, resulting in thousands of inmates leaving prison early. Corrections officials learned of a problem in 2012. A patch to fix the faulty software will be implemented next month. Here's how the bug happened: When people are convicted of a crime, they're given a base sentence. On top of that, there can be extra periods of time — for example, using a firearm might add five years on top of the base sentence. While in prison, inmates can earn time off their sentence for good behavior or participating in work/education programs — but it can only apply to their base sentence. The software involved applied the inmates' good behavior credits to each section of their sentence. The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

211 comments

  1. Pre-order for only $30MM tax dollars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like the software was released early, too.

    1. Re:Pre-order for only $30MM tax dollars! by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Or made at yahoo!

  2. Why do you hate America? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

    Wow... How fucking maliciously vindictive and petty can Uncle Sam get?

    "Yeah, good job getting your life back together, congrats on landing that new job - Now get back in the goddamned cage."

    1. Re:Why do you hate America? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What does Uncle Sam have to do with this? This is Washington state, not Washington, D.C.

    2. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please read the article before posting:

      "Many prisoners released early may not wind up being re-incarcerated, according to Brown. The law requires the state to give day-for-day credit in most cases to a prisoner who has been released early and hasn’t been found to break any laws since, he said."

    3. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This sounds like par for the course. They have something called "Compassionate Release" -- it sounds quite magnanimous but is actually incredibly petty: throwing seriously ill inmates out onto the pavement to reduce medical expenses.

    4. Re:Why do you hate America? by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please read the article before posting:

      You must be new here

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    5. Re:Why do you hate America? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

      Wow... How fucking maliciously vindictive and petty can Uncle Sam get?

      "Yeah, good job getting your life back together, congrats on landing that new job - Now get back in the goddamned cage."

      I don't know if you're American, but if you're not, this kind of thing happens all the time here.

    6. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

      Ummm, no. I don't know where the submitter got that, but that's wrong as far as I heard on the local news. Once they're out, I think even for a day, they cannot be made to go back in.

      Okay, I see it now.

      The agency begins reviewing its records to determine which offenders, already released, should be brought back to the system.

      flies in the face of what I heard.

      http://www.governor.wa.gov/news-media/inslee-announces-immediate-actions-fix-13-year-old-sentencing-errors-discovered-state

      In addition, DOC is working swiftly to locate offenders who were released from prison prior to their actual earned release date and ensure they fulfill their sentences as required by law. In accordance with Supreme Court precedent, most of the offenders who were released early will be given with day for day credit for their time in the community. Depending on how much time they have left to serve, the offenders will go to work release or back to prison.

      Here we go. http://komonews.com/news/local/thousands-of-state-prisoners-mistakenly-released-early

      Inslee's general counsel, Nicholas Brown, said most of the errors were 100 days or less. In some cases, inmates were released just a few days early, but at least one person who is still incarcerated had a release date that was off by about 600 days.

      Based on a prior Supreme Court ruling, most of the affected offenders won't have to go back to prison. But officials have identified at least seven prisoners who were freed but haven't reached their corrected release date yet, and they will need to return to prison. Five of them have already been re-incarcerated.

      Maybe I misheard the story. Or maybe the TV news "over-summarized" it. Either way, not modifying what I said earlier. The paragraph I started with "Ummm".

    7. Re:Why do you hate America? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      This, exactly, and times 1E+6. They'll cause unnecessary damage to some people's lives.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    8. Re:Why do you hate America? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Were the requirements for this software incorrect? If so, who signed off on them? And if they were correct, who signed off on the test script and results? Go track those people down and throw them in jail.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be surprised by this, but states have governments too, and they're ALL in Uncle Sam's back pocket.

    10. Re:Why do you hate America? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Go track those people down and throw them in jail.

      And use the same software to calculate their sentencing?

    11. Re:Why do you hate America? by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed, 100%. Certainly telling them their debt to society is paid and then going back for more is unusual. It has an element of cruelty to it as well.

      If anyone wonders why some people act as if society is their enemy, here's the answer, because it acts like an enemy.

    12. Re:Why do you hate America? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it's not the same at all. If the cell was unlocked (and all of the other doors leading out of the prison) the prisoner still knows that it's a mistake. In this case everyone, including the state, believed that the proper time was served. The proper papers for the release were signed and the possessions were returned. The people left prison in good faith believing they served their debt to society. Someone escaping jail through an unlocked door knows full well that what they are doing is wrong.

    13. Re:Why do you hate America? by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Bullshit! It's like saying to any inmate (and most in the USA are imprisoned for non-violent drug offences that shouldn't even be 'offences') -Out you go, here is the door, be on your way now.
      Then running after them (years later actually) and saying: aaah, back in you go, our mistake.

    14. Re: Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life sentence - no need to calculate.

    15. Re:Why do you hate America? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      One of the purposes of the federal government is to protect the rights of the people from bad actions of the state. At least it has been sine the Civil War.

    16. Re:Why do you hate America? by tolydude · · Score: 1

      "Many prisoners released early may not wind up being re-incarcerated, according to Brown. The law requires the state to give day-for-day credit in most cases to a prisoner who has been released early and hasnâ(TM)t been found to break any laws since, he said."

      Find me anyone who hasn't broken any laws in a given day, week, or month! As many respectable sources point out, you break the law every day without even knowing it: e.g. http://www.washingtonsblog.com... If you don't feel like reading, watch here from 5:18 to 6:18, or even further until to 7:18 for some fun examples. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    17. Re:Why do you hate America? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      These people were released from prison with signed paperwork from the state indicating they served all their time, congratulating them on their release, and wishing them well in their new life. Along with explicit after-prison support, like half-way house enrollment and such.

      Implying the prisoners snuck out early is a lie.

    18. Re:Why do you hate America? by pla · · Score: 2

      Please read the article before posting:

      Yes, please do:

      "Inslee said the state is working to locate offenders released early who need to complete their sentences. Five have been returned to prison, according to Brown."

    19. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Corrections Department is correcting a mistake. It's what they do. [Someone from GEICO please make a commercial about it.]

    20. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any evidence that the US federal government has even been informed of this situation, let alone that they have a cause to act? Again the question: "What does Uncle Sam have to do with this? This is Washington state, not Washington, D.C.".

      The US government does some bad things, however there seem also to be a bunch of people who want to slander it.

    21. Re:Why do you hate America? by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Find me anyone who hasn't broken any laws in a given day, week, or month! As many respectable sources point out, you break the law every day without even knowing it: e.g. http://www.washingtonsblog.com...

      Nonsense. And debunked. The cases presented are extremely rare; situations that happen to very, very few people every year. "You" (most people) never break any of these laws without knowing, not once in your life. "You break the law every day without knowing it" is absolute nonsense.

    22. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter, they're both called the same thing.... The State.

    23. Re:Why do you hate America? by CraigCruden · · Score: 2

      They should ONLY force people to serve out their sentences if they reoffend. If they have returned and integrated into society, there should be no reason to track them down and force them to serve out their sentences - after all it was not their mistake that effectively commuted their sentences.

    24. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

      Wow... How fucking maliciously vindictive and petty can Uncle Sam get?

      "Yeah, good job getting your life back together, congrats on landing that new job - Now get back in the goddamned cage."

      It does mention "some of them". Based on that statement we don't know if they "filter" based on how long ago they were released, how long they should stay longer and stuff like that. Post release criminal record could also play a key role.

      Personally I would be keen on a system where they serve the remaining time starting from the next time they are arrested, assuming the remaining time isn't too long. This will help people who started over with a lawful life while serving justice to those, who didn't learn the lesson. Still it's a tricky subject because while it is bad to be told you are released and then go to jail because it was a mistake, at the same time there could be victims, who are hurt if they do NOT go back to jail. After all they could have lost a loved one or something and then they are hurt once again by the fact that the offender didn't even have to serve the entire time the judge and law sentenced him/her to. This mean when something like this happens, there is no perfect answer on what to do.

      Another good question: how many committed crime after being released, but before the date they were supposed to be released? How do you explain the victims of such crime that the offender was supposed to be in jail at the time, but a software bug made the crime possible? Theft, robbery, rape, murder. There are many possible crimes, which can really hurt or destroy the life if innocent victims and to those people, the bug would become unforgivable.

    25. Re:Why do you hate America? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They get money from incarcerated prisoners...

    26. Re: Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The govt considers smoking a joint illegal. I may or may not break laws everyday, depending on if my dealer is dry or not ;)

    27. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the radio there was a comment that a Supreme Court decision said they couldn't be pulled back in if they'd been good while they were in / during their unintended early release period.

    28. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The radio said several were already back in jail for 'new' crimes when the problem was detected.

    29. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that justifies the parent posting this exactly why?

      "Why do you hate America?"
      "How fucking maliciously vindictive and petty can Uncle Sam get?"

    30. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is a major portion of the cast of Reno 911! I wouldn't call them Uncle Sam, but I would call them funny (or at least deranged)

    31. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just been released.

    32. Re:Why do you hate America? by sglewis100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Find me anyone who hasn't broken any laws in a given day, week, or month! As many respectable sources point out, you break the law every day without even knowing it: e.g. http://www.washingtonsblog.com... If you don't feel like reading, watch here from 5:18 to 6:18, or even further until to 7:18 for some fun examples. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      IF I were to agree with you that everyone breaks the law everyday, it still wouldn't change the fact that the statement was you would get credit for the days as long as you weren't FOUND to have broke the law.

    33. Re:Why do you hate America? by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      Yes, track them all down and throw them away for making a mistake... I guess we're all going away for that one.

    34. Re:Why do you hate America? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The NSA reads all sites, thus read this, and is part of the feds. Buy yes, nobody has yet petitioned the ACLU to protect our rights. Which I'm sure one of the released and re-arrested will do. We just haven't gotten there yet because the evil people like you excuse government inaction. You have to petition for your rights to have them, and that's your responsibility. The government shouldn't recognize blatant illegal acts and step in without the fees paid. Only the rich get justice.

    35. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's BS. I don't believe a prisoner escaping through an unlocked door is wrong. It's illegal maybe. These are two different things though. I don't see how doing what is in *your* best interests can be wrong. That would assume the right thing to do is to lock people up- and that isn't necessarily the case. That's simply the system we have. And nobody can ever be under the obligation to agree to that system. At best we can only make people comply with it.

    36. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not the same at all. If the cell was unlocked (and all of the other doors leading out of the prison) the prisoner still knows that it's a mistake. In this case everyone, including the state, believed that the proper time was served. The proper papers for the release were signed and the possessions were returned. The people left prison in good faith believing they served their debt to society. Someone escaping jail through an unlocked door knows full well that what they are doing is wrong.

      translation: it sucks to be a rapist in this particular situation. Otherwise, it's not so bad.

    37. Re:Why do you hate America? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Wow... How fucking maliciously vindictive and petty can Uncle Sam get?

      A lot more. Better keep quiet before they come after you.

    38. Re:Why do you hate America? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      There's a simple and reasonably fair solution. Tack it on to their next sentence. If they're doing well in society, employed, supporting themselves and their families, and not committing new crimes, leave them alone. The point of prison is supposed to be to reform criminals and there wouldn't be any point in disrupting the lives of people who have been reformed. That couldn't possibly have a positive effect on society.

    39. Re: Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally assuming they became useful members of society..

    40. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not uncle sam. President Obama is the chief law enforcement officer in the United States. Ultimately the buck stops with him. As a God fearing Republican, I find the current for profit prison system to be a national shame. However democrats make a ton of money by supplying free health care, and free housing in a carefully gun controlled environment for the nations African Americans. As long as democrats are making metric fuck tons of money (it is metric because democrats love SI units) from the prison system things will never change.

      The states in and counties with the highest incarceration rates are democratic. Vote democrat if you want to increase your chances of going to jail. Want to stay out of jail, move to a republican state and go to church. Just saying.

    41. Re:Why do you hate America? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Heh... This is the third time (and only the third time ever) that I've gotten to mention something about my old MOS. Some strange trivia for you - though I do not know if this has changed, I kind of doubt it has.

      In the civilian world, if you escape from prison then you're committing a new crime and will be sentenced to a longer term.

      In the military, well, your freedom has been taken. It is only natural that you try to escape. If you escape then someone else is in trouble and you will serve no extra time for that act. (Obviously, you will be subject to other laws but if you simply escape, you're just brought back and stuffed into the hole for a little while and given a higher security classification.)

      If someone locks you up, it's instinct and natural to try to get out. It used to be that my job (transportation officer - traditionally called an escort or chaser) meant that a detainee escaping while in my custody meant that I served that detainees time until they were returned to custody. For better or worse, that is no longer the case. It did, however, mean that escaping prisoners were usually just shot.

      Also, I have no idea how many regulations have changed in the past 30 years.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    42. Re:Why do you hate America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For stupid non-violent stuff they should let it go. But in the case of murderers or people that committed violence, then NOT re-incarcerating is a slap in the face to victims who were promised justice. If the guy who murdered my father in law was let go because of a software glitch, I and my wife's family would be understandably upset.

      But again, for stupid stuff (e.g. non-violent drug offence, stealing a car, etc.) let'em be -- that's the price for not QA'ing yer crappy government contract software.

    43. Re:Why do you hate America? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

      Wow... How fucking maliciously vindictive and petty can Uncle Sam get?

      "Yeah, good job getting your life back together, congrats on landing that new job - Now get back in the goddamned cage."

      I concur with you. I am willing to bet that most, if not all of the released (on error) inmates are not recidivists. They returned to home, job, and in many cases, back to spouse. The reason the government wants them back is for the contract--for profit prisons are great. Its time that the USA should empty their prisons of pot smokers, or bad debt prisoners.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  3. The system screwed up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

    We can't let criminals get off on a technicality.

    1. Re:The system screwed up... by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually we can. There was a fairly recent example of a court sentencing a man but somehow failing to actually send him to prison. He lived clean for well past his sentence's duration and when the authorities realized their mistake a legal battle ensued and the man won. He did have to spend some time in jail pending the outcome of the second legal case, but that was short compared to the time he would have spent had the court affirmed that the state could hold him for his sentence.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:The system screwed up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a legal technicality, not a technical technicality.

    3. Re:The system screwed up... by neanderslob · · Score: 1

      You say this as though they're being found "not guilty" due to an error. Instead they're being sentenced and serving time, just not as much time as originally prescribed. The question is whether it's worth the cost (time, effort, familial disruption, credibility of the system) to make these people serve the objective duration of their subjective sentence. Given that the time issued for a given charge is quite varied from case to case, I'm not sure it is.

    4. Re:The system screwed up... by TWX · · Score: 1

      That's a legal technicality, not a technical technicality.

      What's the difference? Humans still chose to process the inmates for release, fill-out paperwork, return their property to them, arrange for transportation, and open the gates. Even if the humans were advised by a computer, a human still created the computer and programmed the computer, and were in-charge of the computer, and those humans are representatives of the State. At any time in the process those representatives of the State could have chosen to audit the computer results, and from a sanity-perspective should have audited those results compared to the old way of tabulating for several years before coming to rely on the new system to make sure that it was actually working correctly.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:The system screwed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if humans screws up, we put them behind bars.
      If the computer screws up, we put humans behind bars.

      So f what? The system f up and should take the consequences.

    6. Re:The system screwed up... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      You want to hear something crazy? I read a report once that mentioned that it's estimated that 80% of first time offenders are so put off by the immediate results of being caught - arrest, charging, booking, and the trial that any actual punishment is superfluous and that they won't re-offend. Putting them in prison actually increases the odds that they're re-offend because of the extra disadvantages when they get out.

      Consider classical conditioning - the closer the punishment is to the offense, the more effective it is. As such, I'd argue that the marginal benefit, reform wise, of any time past, say, 5 years, is very minimal. Longer sentences should be reserved for when you believe reform isn't possible and are switching to simply warehousing them. For that matter, a 10 year sentence is enough to keep a snot-nosed punk out of society long enough for him to 'calm down' given that peak criminality is basically 15-25 year old males.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:The system screwed up... by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      There was a fairly recent example of a court sentencing a man but somehow failing to actually send him to prison.

      This is probably the case you're referring to.

    8. Re:The system screwed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a one-offense sex offender (for a "no-victim crime" that supposedly happened over a decade ago and that took a plea because it's literally impossible to "win" sex crime cases) posting AC for obvious reasons, I can verify that this is actually a thing. One week in jail, and that was my last, and will be forevermore if I have anything to say about it. As a result of my traumatic experience, I hate the government and the justice system and I suffered from severe paranoia for years afterwards that stunted my personal and professional growth horribly.

      I'll just say this: felonies should expire in seven years like credit report items. People can and do change. Our injustice system is set up as if people can never stop being shitheads and that's just wrong. It's also a self-perpetuating problem.

    9. Re:The system screwed up... by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the one.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    10. Re:The system screwed up... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Well, I recommend we sentence that computer to 365 days of Windows 10.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    11. Re:The system screwed up... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I had a debate on Slashdot once and decided to bring some facts with me. According to the FBI, Sex Offenders are the second-most LEAST likely to re-offend. Murderers are the least likely to re-offend. (I assume that's because they done killed all the people that needed killing but reality doesn't always mirror the amusing things I have in my head.)

      They were claiming that Sex Offenders could not be rehabilitated and should be shot. (I assume they're a closet pedo.) I figured that wasn't true so I went out and dug up some of that data stuff. As I recall, they called me a fag and a hippie. It was not, shall we say, the most productive chats I've had on Slashdot but I did learn something new.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    12. Re:The system screwed up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Well, I recommend we sentence that computer to 365 days of Windows ME.

      FTFY

    13. Re:The system screwed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never let facts get in the way of a good mob. Ironically, those who shout loudest against some sort of immorality are often the worst offenders in their heart. I'm happier every time I see someone discuss the facts instead of the fear. Thank you.

    14. Re:The system screwed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there' a saying I can't quite remember, something like: the first two years you're angry, the next two years you're contrite. after 5 years, you're just "doing time". if I had an account I'd mod this insightful.

      conventional wisdom says the appropriate punishment for crimeX is sentenceY. criminals serve a fraction of sentenceY, yet do fine after release, proving that the crime=>sentence map is excessive. this argument assumes low recidivism.

  4. That's rather sickening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not the error - lol software - the jackboots on the ground trying to round up people who thought they were on the up and up.

    Imagine getting your life back together, scraping together money to get a place to live, maybe somehow managing to land a job... And now you're back in the slammer.

    That's not going to make anyone bitter or wanting to just give the hell up, I'm sure. Hooray for future increases in recividism.

    1. Re:That's rather sickening. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they sign sort of paper or receive some sort of paper or proof that indicates that they are released. And I wonder if there is then some sort of disclaimer that says 'you are free, unless we fuck up and then you are not free anymore, because fuck you.'

      If not, they will probably just say they are fugitives and shoot them on sight.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:That's rather sickening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting anon due to mod... Anyway, by and large most people released from prison will be on probation for a long time. Usually terms of probation are that if you violate it (commit a crime or violate any orders given to you for example to stay away from someone or to not use alcohol or something) then you could get some jail time or some punishment.

  5. Idiocracy at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not Sure: Uh, ya I'm not supposed to be in this line, I'm actually supposed to be getting out of here.
    Guard: You're in the wrong line, Dumbass, the line to get out is over there...
    Not Sure: Thanks
    walks out

    1. Re:Idiocracy at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crucifixion?
      Er no freedom actually.
      What?
      Yeah, they said I hadn't done anything and I could go and live on an island somewhere.
      Oh I say, that's very nice. Well, off you go then.
      No, I'm just pulling your leg, it's crucifixion really.
      Oh yes, very good. Well...
      Yes I know, out of the door, one cross each, line on the left.

  6. minor drug offenses should have no jail / prison t by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    minor drug offenses should have no jail / prison time.

  7. They should fight it out in court befor going back by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should fight it out in court before going back in demand a trail before the can be put back in to prison.

  8. Brilliant software developers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ....that cannot do simple addition.

    1. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 0

      Or were given bad instructions by the people who needed the software.

    2. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you there is an e-mail saying that the users tested it completely and it works properly.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      User testing tests the UI, not every possible software function. If you are using UAT as the only test of functionality, then the software developer is doing it wrong.

    4. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      Hey, calendars are really hard.
      I wish they would make a library for that, or something...

    5. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is never time to do it right, but you always have time to do it over.

      When was the last time you bank paid more interest that it should have? But then they are state workers, been there, done that, but not _that_ agency.

    6. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Even with good libraries to do the math, handling dates can be difficult. In large part this is due to the ambiguous way people talk about dates in natural language.

      Consider a simple example: It's Sunday. An associate says "let's have a meeting next Tuesday." Will you meet 2 days later, or 8 days later? In my experience it's about a 50/50 ratio which meaning was intended by the speaker.

    7. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and it also helps if you know that 2 + 7 = 9, not 8... ;-)

    8. Re:Brilliant software developers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then your associate is illiterate. `date` figures it out easily. 2 days ago means two days before today, +2 days means two days from now. unless the metric was normalized around an explicit --date param. either way, theres no ambiguity

  9. Easy fix by ashshy · · Score: 1

    Should just have used Date::Manip from the start.

    --
    #o#
    O Moo.
    1. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFS. This error is the equivalent of mapping a function onto an array, when the correct behavior should be calling it on array[0].

    2. Re:Easy fix by ashshy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah. And what are the chances that this system was written in Perl anyway? Just dropping a bad and terribly niche joke here, my friend.

      --
      #o#
      O Moo.
  10. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WA State Dept. of Corrections: "Ooops, our bad; sorry if any of these guys rape your wife or daughter or kill someone in your family!"

    1. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WA State Dept. of Corrections: "Ooops, our bad; sorry if any of these guys smokes a joint in the privacy of their own home."

      FTFY

  11. "Up to?" by snarfies · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is that "Up to" as in, we don't actually KNOW a number?

    I actually find that to be the more alarming issue.

    1. Re:"Up to?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Up to" is a usual tactic to produce an alarming article when the actual number can be much less, or even zero.

      "Up to 7.3B people infected by the pinewood nematode" makes a nice headline too.

    2. Re:"Up to?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that "Up to" as in, we don't actually KNOW a number?

      I suspect they know the number. It's 3,200.

    3. Re:"Up to?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of like how your ISP sells you "Up to" a certain amount of bandwidth. Could be less, could be a lot less.

    4. Re:"Up to?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already failed at math once, what makes you think they could get it right if they tried?

      *AC cause I modded ya up :)

    5. Re:"Up to?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect they know 3200 had their duration calculated by the buggy software. However the bug triggered when they were sentenced with a base and extensions for "extra crime". On top of that they should be left out early due to good behavior. This mean they have to get the patched software and then run the calculations for those 3200 inmates. Some will be affected by the bug while others didn't get a sentence or behavior to trigger the bug. This mean they have a precise number of candidates for having buggy calculations. They will know precisely once they have the patched software and run the calculation on those people again.

      There is nothing special about not knowing the precise number of people/companies/whatever being affected by public bugs like this one. They sometimes have a pretty good idea about who and how many are affected, but they will not go public with it because it is a personal estimation and it doesn't count. What counts for public announcements will be running all the calculations again with the patched software and deliver the precise number based on the calculations. It's kind of like evidence for court. "I think he did it" will not work, but "I recorded a video while he was doing it" works. Official statements have to provide facts, not estimations or guesses done by some faceless employee. There are actually laws to ensure the statements are based on facts in order to make them trustworthy. Providing a statement like "we think around 2000 of the inmates are affected" could very well be illegal.

  12. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should fight it out in court before going back in demand a trail before the can be put back in to prison.

    A long and dusty trail at that.

  13. Cruel and Unusual by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think releasing an inmate and then trying to put him back in prison due to an error in the system constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. On the other hand, I think illegal drugs and drunkenness are such a huge problem that we should execute all caught driving drunk or possessing any amount of illegal drugs to be executed within 48 hours of their arrest on the first offense. And I include even the very young in that as well. I don't care if it is an eleven year old smoking crack. He should be put to death at once.

    1. Re:Cruel and Unusual by dex22 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It occurred to me that if we replaced airbags with shotgun cartridges people might start driving carefully and stop running into other cars and things.

    2. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was the original intent. The airbag is just a clerical error.

    3. Re:Cruel and Unusual by bentcd · · Score: 1

      It occurred to me that if we replaced airbags with shotgun cartridges people might start driving carefully and stop running into other cars and things.

      No they wouldn't. This isn't very far from the state of affairs before seatbelts became mandatory equipment, and nobody cared much back then that people were dying in droves. Not even the drivers themselves. (Volvo cared though, and invented seatbelts.)

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    4. Re: Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not cruel AND unusual if they do it to 3200 people, then it's just cruel.

    5. Re:Cruel and Unusual by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You'd have to hit the steering wheel pretty hard with your head to detonate that embedded shotgun cartridge.

    6. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a variation on that. I think drugs -- all of them -- should be legal. But, if you harm someone else while you're using any drug, it's straight to the gas chamber (or firing squad, gallows, whatever) with you. With no appeals either; the day after the guilty verdict, the sentence is carried out.

      That includes alcohol. Many, perhaps most, people can use drugs in a responsible manner. Those that can't, and do them anyway, should die.

    7. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would drastically reduce the number of repeat offenders, though.

    8. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until someone started going around and banging on the bumpers of the vehicle to engage the safety mechanism, triggering the airbag. "but officer, I didn't shot them. They ran into me!"

    9. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It occurred to me that if we replaced airbags with shotgun cartridges people might start driving carefully and stop running into other cars and things.

      That reminds me of this article:

      At the heart of the problem is the airbag's inflator, a metal cartridge loaded with propellant wafers, which in some cases has ignited with explosive force. If the inflator housing ruptures in a crash, metal shards from the airbag can be sprayed throughout the passenger cabinâ"a potentially disastrous outcome from a supposedly life-saving device.

    10. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I remember reading that the windows and windshields used to be made of ordinary glass, which caused horrible and fatal mutilations due to being turned into flying glass shards.

    11. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a shotgun cartridge. What you want is a six-inch spike sticking out of the steering column towards the driver's chest. Fewer failure modes, a constant visible reminder, and you specifically target the one person who's actually responsible.

    12. Re:Cruel and Unusual by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

      Just buy a Honda. The airbag shoots metal fragments at the driver. It's known to cause fatalities. Of course you can't make that decision for other people, but feel free to get one for yourself if you think it will help your driving.

    13. Re:Cruel and Unusual by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The person you're replying too is a bit mistaken. Volvo did not invent or even introduce the first seat belts. That's a common mistake found on the internet. I'm a car aficionado but not an automobile historian. I also own two Volvos. What an engineer for Volvo *did* invent was the 3-point safety harness (seat belt). Lots of other cars had belts prior to that. I've seen a Nash from the 40s that had factory belts.

      I love Volvo and all but, well... Hmm, lemme find a source 'cause someone might argue (everyone seem to think Volvo invented 'em)...

      Here you go:
      http://www.volvocars.com/intl/...

      That's from Volvo themselves. If they'd invented the seat belt then they'd have listed it. They don't. They specifically mention having invented the 3 point system. Come to think of it, I've seen some old Saabs that had lap belts too. I dunno when those came out or anything.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  14. "software"? by Kevoco · · Score: 1

    More like "Excel spreadsheet"

  15. Tracking them down again? by cshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can they do that after they've been released?

    Why not just leave these people alone? Why as a taxpayer am I being forced to re-incarcerate anyone?

    It's bad enough that we have this many people in jail to begin with. Who exactly does re-incarcerating people benefit? Most jails in America are overpopulated to begin with, and now... we want to put more people in?

    Software issue or not, this is stupid.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

    1. Re:Tracking them down again? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Why not just leave these people alone?

      Because they didn't spend the amount of time in jail that their sentence called for.

      Why as a taxpayer am I being forced to re-incarcerate anyone?

      The cost of collecting the people who were mistakenly released is probably very small in most cases compared to the cost of their actual incarceration. So what you're really asking is, "Why should taxpayers foot the bill for putting criminals in jail?" Are you suggesting that we bill their families, instead? Who else did you think was going to pay for maintaining a convicted criminal's time in prison?

      It's bad enough that we have this many people in jail to begin with.

      That is definitely true. Fewer people should commit crimes.

      Who exactly does re-incarcerating people benefit?

      It's finishing the incarceration we're talking about, here. So what you're really asking is, "Who exactly does incarcerating a criminal benefit?" Let me guess, you don't think criminals should ever be locked up, right? Otherwise you'd be able to answer your own phony question.

      we want to put more people in?

      No, we want to keep the people who are still supposed to be in, in.

      Software issue or not, this is stupid.

      Making convicted criminals complete their prison sentences is stupid?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Tracking them down again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap software. Until someone figured out this bug can be exploited to raise profits for the prison owners.

    3. Re:Tracking them down again? by armanox · · Score: 1

      Depends on the crime. I don't think that most of the people in prison/jail belong there. It only makes them a further liability to society. Instead of making people totally worthless, how about we either A- have better alternatives to a for-profit prison system, like public humiliation, or B - actually make something useful out of these people?

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    4. Re:Tracking them down again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand this mentality of having to track anyone down. Statistically, these people will naturally wind up back in prison anyway, Just tack on time to their next sentence. Problem solved.

    5. Re:Tracking them down again? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      how about we either A- have better alternatives to a for-profit prison system

      So you'd rather have a prison run by volunteers? By people who don't make a living while dealing with criminals?

      public humiliation

      So, if someone wrecks your business, or steals from you, or rapes your daughter, or kills your friend ... public humiliation! There, everything's better now.

      Why do you think that people who don't have the integrity to hold off on committing crimes are going to care about your idea of humiliation? Or are you advocating for something really, really atrocious and cruel? Ever read that part of the constitution? You know, the part that makes that totally off limits?

      actually make something useful out of these people?

      OK, so you've got one of "these people" in custody because they just used a machete to lop the hands off of a rival gang member from MS-13. What did you have in mind - chain gang landscaping crews? Forced factory work? Be specific instead of dishing out meaningless, contradictory platitudes.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Tracking them down again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's bad enough that we have this many people in jail to begin with.

      That is definitely true. Fewer people should commit crimes.

      We have more than anywhere else in the world. At some point we have to admit we have a problem. It was a good idea when it was pitched in the '50s as a means of making every Black man a felon, so we could strip all them of the right to vote. But it turns out that experiment was a failure. How many centuries until we admit that error and correct it?

      As much as you don't want to admit it, putting people in prison *causes* crime.

      Making convicted criminals complete their prison sentences is stupid?

      No, violating the release terms of the citizens is wrong and evil. They were released by the prison, with full release papers and the complete process followed. That contract should be honored.

    7. Re:Tracking them down again? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Why as a taxpayer am I being forced to re-incarcerate anyone?

      You're paying so the person can repay his debt to you. Or something.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    8. Re:Tracking them down again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words: prison-industrial complex.

    9. Re:Tracking them down again? by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Tsk tsk. Feeding the troll rational responses is still feeding the troll.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    10. Re:Tracking them down again? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      As much as you don't want to admit it, putting people in prison *causes* crime.

      So let me get this straight. You go into a liquor store and threaten to kill someone if they don't give you their money. You get caught, and are put into prison for being a violent douche. Being put into prison is what, through time travel, causes you to have committed the crime in the first place.

      You would prefer the scenario where: You go into a liquor store and threaten to kill someone if they don't give you their money. You get caught. You are given a pat on the head, and the lack of consequence for being a violent douche magically causes you to change your ways and never do such a thing again.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:Tracking them down again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      You would prefer the scenario where: You go into a liquor store and threaten to kill someone if they don't give you their money. You get caught. You are given a pat on the head, and the lack of consequence for being a violent douche magically causes you to change your ways and never do such a thing again.

      That's what happens when young rich white kids do it. And they grow up to not be in prison. It's not about a single person, but when the system is so obviously rigged, it makes the system fail to work. Prison isn't a deterrent when someone expects to end up there no matter what they do. Sandra Bland was pulled over for a trivial traffic offense, and ended up dead in jail. That's the reality. That you don't like reality, and that reality causes crime, won't change reality.

    12. Re:Tracking them down again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      A corporation lost some profit due to an administrative error. That cannot go uncorrected.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Tracking them down again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Prison isn't a deterrent when someone expects to end up there no matter what they do." That says it all. Plus, some people who feel their imprisonment is horribly unjust will stew in hatred for years or decades and promptly go after those who ruined their lives...or those they perceive as having done so. Way to go, crime stoppers.

    14. Re:Tracking them down again? by armanox · · Score: 1

      Except most people in jail are none of the above. Either that, or you really don't know what crime statistics look like in American cities, or have family that is or has been in jail.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    15. Re:Tracking them down again? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Sandra Bland was pulled over for a trivial traffic offense

      Right. But then she didn't act anything like a person being cited for a traffic violation. And when she ended up being brought in she (as she'd tried multiple times before) killed herself. That is the reality. You're saying that, through some sort of time travel, her mental inability to act normally and her existing suicidal tendencies caused her detainment, which in turn rippled back through time and caused her to be arrested? Do you even listen to yourself?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:Tracking them down again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But then she didn't act anything like a person being cited for a traffic violation.

      Yeah, she acted like an uppity Nigger, and deserved to die.

      The cop asked her if she was nervous. She said yes. The cop asked why (hoping to hear something incriminating) , and she said she was nervous because she was pulled over. The cop then asked her "are you done yet" because her direct answer to his direct question took more than 3 words, and she responded that she was just answering his question. The cop recognized the uppity bitch was right, and so he arrested her.

      It was a by the book lynching for the '60s or '70s, but a little out of place for today, with all the privileged whites on Slashdot excusing the illegal arrest.

      I'm sure it was a suicide. Like the guy a few years ago in Texas with documented death threats for dating white women who beat himself up, then lynched himself with a pulley (in a manner that was physically impossible to hang himself with). Ruled a suicide, no investigation needed. Same here. When you hear the same story a million times, proven false most of them, it makes the few that might be true sound like lies and cover-ups.

  16. Idiotic that people will be put back in prison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Early estimates indicate the offenders were released from prison an average 55 days before their correct release dates, according to Inslee’s general counsel, Nicholas Brown.

    Seriously? We're going to track down people who've likely served years in prison just so they can serve (on average) another 55 days? This is incredibly idiotic. Here's why:


    1. It's expensive to put people back in prison.
      Anyone who has a job would likely lose their job when they have to serve another month in prison. Thus making their life MORE unstable, and creating more crime. This is the exact opposite of what our prison system is supposed to do.
      It was the states stupid error in the first place, and no fault of the former inmate.
  17. Python by mstefanro · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure there's a built-in Python module to manage inmates' sentences.

    1. Re:Python by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Nope, no Python module, the Feds don't trust the Snakes. Emacs does have a key-combo to try, convict and manage sentences though.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    2. Re:Python by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Being an emacs aficionado myself, I find this the funniest remark on slashdot this year. But hey - there's eight days to go, yet.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    3. Re:Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought it was BSD which managed jails.

  18. Requirements, requirements, requirements... by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

    I've always found 90% of software bugs come from requirements gathering/domain analysis. Especially when you are trying convert the law into code.

    1. Re:Requirements, requirements, requirements... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other 90% come from idiot programmers who should never be allowed anywhere near a compiler, especially programmers that are outsourced half-way around the globe.

    2. Re:Requirements, requirements, requirements... by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

      A few years ago, I saw a talk by someone from the IRS. They said that they were trying to get Congress to use a reduced set of sentence constructions, as quite a bit of analyst's time is in trying to figure out what the hell the laws passed mean, and trying to translate it into logic they can put into their software.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    3. Re:Requirements, requirements, requirements... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The weird thing is, the Law already is code. I mean, not only does it call the list of rules a "code" but it shares many features and problems of software code.

      For instance, there is a lot of duplication of effort—descriptions of sections codified within the sections themselves; tables of contents distributed at multiple levels of the structure willy-nilly (not sure the software analog of this..); attempts to avoid duplication by referencing other laws or sections of other laws; and a weird runtime patching system in which the effects of old laws are modified by the text of newer ones.

      The US Code is long overdue for a refactor, and indeed would probably benefit greatly from many of the lessons learned in software development.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Requirements, requirements, requirements... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've felt for a long time that since law is so important to everybody because of the consequences of it, it should be required to be written in such a way that a 6th grader should have a reasonable chance of understanding it.

      So, bets. Which will happen first, my proposal or the heat death of the universe?

    5. Re:Requirements, requirements, requirements... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You forgot that the results of a UAT for unrelated code will change the constants across all the code. It's called "case law" in law, no idea what it would be called in code.

      The single thing that would benefit law best is a sunset clause on laws. Explicit action needed to renew silly laws would help clean up some of the stupid ones. Though, it'd have to be written intelligently, or we'd get a "renew all laws" vote at the start of every session, and no review of the laws themselves.

    6. Re: Requirements, requirements, requirements... by wik · · Score: 1

      Case law could be considered LD_PRELOAD.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  19. Knowledge of math is sometimes important by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Those who write software, even if it's a spreadsheet calculation, sometimes need to understand the distributive and commutative rules of arithmetic. Actual knowledge of the names of these terms doesn't excuse one for understanding the principles of arithmetic. No higher math needed.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Knowledge of math is sometimes important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who write software, even if it's a spreadsheet calculation, sometimes need to understand the distributive and commutative rules of arithmetic. Actual knowledge of the names of these terms doesn't excuse one for understanding the principles of arithmetic. No higher math needed.

      But "high" mathematics is needed for arithmetic.

    2. Re:Knowledge of math is sometimes important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing it out for those who didn't catch the implications: this is HIGH SCHOOL MATH we're talking about.

      Although in the case of TFA, they applied the days off to the completely wrong things. I'm sure the code iteratively reduced each category individually.

    3. Re:Knowledge of math is sometimes important by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Perhaps theoretical mathematicians see what I see as pretty simple concepts of arithmetic as higher math. OK, I can go with that but on the practical level maybe not so much. One of you stated the math involved here is high school math. I think I learned that the result of 3 times 4 is the same as 4 times 3 or the result of 3 + 4 is the same as 4 +3 in elementary school. One should obviously know that the result of 4x(3 +1) is also the same as 4x3 + 4x1 but not the same as 4x3 + 1 which may be the mistake made by the prison officials.

      In talking to a HS math teacher he pointed out that much of his first year HS algebra course is 5th grade arithmetic since his students' math experience was at that level coming out of middle school. No wonder one-third of HS grads need remedial work when they get to college.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    4. Re:Knowledge of math is sometimes important by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Knowing the math is irrelevant if the person who gives you the equation writes it wrong.

    5. Re:Knowledge of math is sometimes important by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Clearly everyone along the "chain of command" need to know math, including the legislature writing the law, the governor who signs and orders it implementation of the law, and the many likely members of the prison hierarchy who will interpret the rules that go to the ultimate coder. My guess is there is no equation in any of these communications and it's not likely that there is much, if any, reverse communication back up the chain.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  20. Software error in your favor: go directly to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen that Monopoly card before.

  21. Took how many YEARS for a patch??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have known about this sense 2012 and will only NOW be patching the issue in 2016?
    So for 4 YEARS they've KNOWINGLY let convicted felons out early and NOW want to send some of them back to prison?
    What is wrong with this picture???

    1. Re:Took how many YEARS for a patch??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since != sense

    2. Re:Took how many YEARS for a patch??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they continue to release people early because of the overcrowding...go figure

    3. Re:Took how many YEARS for a patch??? by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      The fact it took 4 YEARS to fix a bug?!?!?!?!?!?

    4. Re:Took how many YEARS for a patch??? by QuebecNerd · · Score: 1

      To the developers:

      Find that line of code: remaining_sentence = (base_sentence - good_behavior) + (extra_time - good_behavior)

      Replace with this line: remaining_sentence = (base_sentence - good_behavior) + extra_time

      There...fixed it for you.

      Hope this help.

  22. Go back?? WTF by Ostrich25 · · Score: 1

    Finish their terms? No. You let them out, they stay out. They're trying to rebuild their lives, don't fuck them over by making them lose jobs and go back to prison because you programmed a computer incorrectly.

  23. so, not really a bug at all... by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The software involved applied the inmates' good behavior credits to each section of their sentence

    So we're going to have to refactor the code to include subroutines and functions that support the US criminal justice systems perogative of biblical retribution it seems. For those worried about the inmates released, you can sleep soundly tonight knowing they are barred from most forms of employment, voting, public assistance, loans, and education grants after being released under the auspices that they are now rehabilitated. homeless shelters will also refuse service in many cases to convicted felons. So thanks to this system the only thing an early release ensures is an early re-incarceration due to a life-by-default of petty theft and drug trade.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:so, not really a bug at all... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      In most States, convicts can vote but some make you wait until you get off probation. The detainees at the corrections facility voted via absentee ballot. I know the inmates in Maine's DOC are all encouraged to vote - it has been on the news and I've done some minimal looking into it. I forget which states disallow it but they're mostly in the South and there aren't a whole lot of 'em as I recall.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  24. Good Time by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0

    How about you do your "Good Time" on your own time. E.g. don't do the crime, if you can't do the time.

    Once you are caught and sentenced, that's it. Do the time. If you don't behave in prison, you get MORE time.

    criminals do what criminals do.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Good Time by show+me+altoids · · Score: 1

      I love the way your sig (which you probably didn't even think of when you posted this) is a perfect reply to the rest of your post.

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
  25. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by DarkTempes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With what money are they going to hire a lawyer to do that?

  26. stop blaming software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop using software error as an excuse to blame "black box".
    It is a human error (person who provided requirements, coded it, tested, signed off, etc)
    These errors happened occasionally before when humans made manual calculations. Here at least once it is fixed it is fixed for good.

  27. Isn't this the plan? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the plan? Let all the meth and coke kingpins out of jail because it's culturally insensitive that we locked them up?
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/18/obama-commutes-sentences-nearly-100-drug-offenders/

    1. Re:Isn't this the plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because people who get caught with drugs in their pocket are "Kingpins"

      I once walked out of the house with a utility knife in my pocket, I guess that makes me an international arms dealer...

  28. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    public defender / a rights lawsuit where the lawyers will come to them

  29. Nothing to see. Move along. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Informative

    Folks, most of these "early releases" were around 45 days early. Nothing to see. Move along.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Nothing to see. Move along. by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

      Nothing to see -- move on if they they just treated the sentences as commuted and served. It would be vindictive and cruel punishment to track them down and lock them up for 45 days -- forcing them to be unemployed disrupting their families -- for a mistake not of their making.

  30. Why our system is broken by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    for example, using a firearm might add five years on top of the base sentence

    Because threatening to shoot someone is soooo much worse than threatening to beat them with a bat or stab them if they don't comply.

  31. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good luck with that. The Marshal Service is just going to show up and put them in handcuffs; it's not going to be a discussion. You can't get justice once you're in the system... and apparently not once you're out, either.

  32. Awesome turn around time on the bugfixing by klingens · · Score: 1

    They found the problem in 2012 and it took until 2016 to actually fix this relatively minor problem with big consequences?
    Apparently the state of Washington has outsourced this software and its maintenance to their biggest taxpayer, Microsoft. No other way there is any reason to wait for a bugfix for four years.

  33. It's not Uncle Sam by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    It's his corrupt buddies that run the private prison systems. This bug cost those bastards millions. Private prisons are an obviously bad idea that we all look the other way on since we don't wanna pay taxes to house inmates humanly :(...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's not Uncle Sam by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      It's probably pot. Washington (state) toked up long before they made it legal.

  34. Will they get one by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    a public defender that is. They're not accused of a crime. At any rate the public defenders are so underfunded they're barely useful. By the time a pro-bono charity gets involved a lot of them will have finished their sentence...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  35. ah by dlt074 · · Score: 1

    spoken like someone who has never relied on a public defender.

  36. these algorithms may be immensely complicated by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Three years ago an accidentally released white gang member killed the head of Colorado Prisons dressed as a pizza delivery guy (he killed the pizza guy for his coat and car too). The killer had been accidentally released years early. A subsequent audit of prisoner sentences found a one third error rate. Both in undercalculating bad behavior extensions or over calculating good behavior reductions.

    1. Re:these algorithms may be immensely complicated by banjonz · · Score: 1

      Why was the head of Colorado Prisons dressed as a pizza delivery guy? I also hope he was convicted of the murder. Seriously, with English as a specification language, no wonder mistakes happen.

  37. Re:minor drug offenses should have no jail / priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why, to make room to throw h1b people in jail?

  38. QC? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's almost as if you can hire people to test your software to make sure MAJOR problems like this don't sneak through. This is not an obscure memory leak, which lead to a date error causing a segfault, this is a MAJOR requirement being mis-implemented, which I'm sure is just as much on the requirements level as it is on the coding level.

    1. Re:QC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrections officials learned of a problem in 2012. A patch to fix the faulty software will be implemented next month.

      I assume they were using the last three years to test the patch...

    2. Re:QC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A checkbox on a checklist is not a thorough test. Testing what one is asked to test, with no pursuit of potential flaws or poking of the system to see if related bugs, is the hallmark of goal-driven QA testing done by off-shore consultants.

      Been there, done that, had one *hell* of ta time replacing a whole group of QA minions with one local engineer who consistently found regression bugs and saved us millions of dollars with every release by catching booby traps *early*. I actually had to get the manager canned who insisted that if we just gave checklists to the foreign engineers, it would be cheaper. It meant that *he* had 5 people reporting to him and got managerial privileges: he wasn't *about* to give that up.

  39. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Adriax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tough on crime crowd, also known as the board of directors of for-profit prisons, has done a fine job of kneecapping public defenders. To the point that in some areas they have as little as 15 minutes on average to dedicate to a particular case. As such people who can't afford a private lawyer are told to just plead guilty and take whatever leniency the judge feels like granting that day, even if there is clear cut evidence of their innocence. Add in mandatory minimums and you get a nice steady stream of easy convicts the prisons rake in profit from.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  40. This is not a software error.... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

    This is software working exactly as written. An error would be it adding 2 + 2 and getting 3.99999999999997.

    This is an error of either the coder, who didn't want to bother coding in the exceptions to the good behavior rules, or the project manager who didn't provide the good behavior exceptions to the coder, or perhaps even the state, for not highlighting the necessity of the exceptions to the software provider.

    The code is blameless here. #notallcode

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  41. Re:minor drug offenses should have no jail / priso by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    the cost to lock people up is high

  42. Re:Software error in your favor: go directly to ja by omnichad · · Score: 1

    In whose favor?

  43. They probably outsourced that pesky 'coding' work by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    ...and are now totally getting what they deserve.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  44. Re:minor drug offenses should have no jail / priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >minor drug offenses should have no jail / prison time.

    Major drug offenses should have no jail / prison time.

    Because it's immoral to force into cages innocent people who haven't initiated acts of aggression themselves.

  45. Read the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article gives a little more insight than the headline.
    There will be a one for one standard - those who have remained crime-free for 10 days, for example, will be excused for 10 days of sentence.
    But, those who were released 600 days early have to go in and finish their time.

    1. Re:Read the Article by sglewis100 · · Score: 2

      Yeah whatever. You probably made that up. Like someone on Slashdot would actually read the article. Please!

    2. Re:Read the Article by KGIII · · Score: 1

      What's this "article" you speak of?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  46. Technically not Uncle Same by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Technically speaking, this isn't 'Uncle Sam', which would be the federal government. This is the Washington state correctional system that's being petty. Generally speaking, shorter sentences than we assign here in the states are better for various reasons.

    So - Either we track down these released felons, who are doing what they're supposed to, in which case we don't need to spend the ~$50k/year to lock them up, or they're back to criminal behavior, in which case they'll show back up in prison from that.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  47. wow slow news day I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so how is this newz for nerds?
    Sounds more like a hororfying aspect to the victums, and a happy time for those whom are released..
    But moving past that, How can they be locked up again? Once released are they Acquited of their crimes based on time served, as its perceived?
    Personally i wanna knbow whom is being fired over this? What's the recomended course of remediation?
    WHOM IS HELD ACCOUNTABLE?
    Moving far forward, why havent the familys of the victums banded to sue the local govt. for promogulating this issue.
    What happens if someone is released and goes on a killing spree. what's the legal recourse for that situation?
    I also wonder regarding the comonalities, how many of these individuals are associated with organized crime, drug trafficking, slavery, etc..

    is there a comon thread to this?

    1. Re:wow slow news day I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow not even 1 response..

      So they reported the incident, but tactfully left out that part about whom is taking responsibility for this.
      If one of these inmates released goes and kills someone or a group of individuals, who is responsible?
      The state, the county, local law enforcement, State police, the State capitol.
      I mean really guys.. What or Whom??

  48. Found in 2012... still not fixed by ArcadeNut · · Score: 2

    Amazing.... They probably could have re-written the software from scratch in that amount of time....

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    1. Re:Found in 2012... still not fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think they caught it? From COBOL to M$.

    2. Re:Found in 2012... still not fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be our product manager. "Let's wait to fix these until a customer complains."

    3. Re:Found in 2012... still not fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be our product manager. "Let's wait to fix these until a customer complains."

      That explains a lot. A boos like that would likely view the inmates as the customer since after all the inmates are what the software is about. It would actually be a good way to write bugfree software. No bugs exist until the inmates complain about them.

    4. Re:Found in 2012... still not fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ScreenOS has been EOL/EOS since before then. All their efforts have been into developing JunOS.

    5. Re:Found in 2012... still not fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an idiot, wrong story.

  49. Re:They probably outsourced that pesky 'coding' wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having worked for the State of Washington (different agency) for 8 years, I can tell you this wasn't outsourced, and was just plain FTE incompetence. The bigger question is... will ANYONE be held accountable for it? (and I'll answer that now: Nope).

  50. So much laughable by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    I'm confused... is it even legal to put people back in jail after they have been officially released of their term, for a crime they already served?

    I don't give a damn if they were mistakenly released... if someone got out and have started their life over and now put back because the gov made a stupid mistake... who should pay for the inconvenience?

    And why the hell did it take 3 years to fix such an error? In my knowledge, based on 15 years of professional experience, this type of software bug takes one person a few hours to fix. Plus the national coordination to apply the fix, it still takes 6 months max.

  51. Yakima Police Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...resulting in thousands of inmates leaving prison early, and going to work for the Yakima Police Department."

    There, FTFY.

  52. Corrections Department or Telco? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    The Corrections Department is now trying to track down released inmates to make some of them finish their terms.

    Replace "The Corrections Department" with the name of your favourite Telco and it still sounds plausable!

  53. How about we get rid of time based sentencing? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once you are caught and sentenced, that's it. Do the time. If you don't behave in prison, you get MORE time.

    How about we get rid of time based sentences period? You're sentenced, not to X years, but to a program that must be completed. Which program you end up in depends on your crime and circumstances.

    Say you're a high school dropout caught breaking into cars to steal shit to feed your drug habit. You get 'sentenced' to an education and drug treatment program. Once you've gotten your GED and completed rehab, you're released.
    On the other hand, take a high school graduate gang banger dealer. That sentencing might be to an anti-gang course and trade school/associates degree. Bust your ass, out in a year. Don't bother? You could be there for the next 20...

    Come back? Well, next step up in the program - much more difficult.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:How about we get rid of time based sentencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smarter criminals, trained to overcome adversity.

    2. Re:How about we get rid of time based sentencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you take the Calvinist view that crime is inherent to certain persons, sure. Empirical results show otherwise: that people with tools to do something other than crime will generally prefer not to engage in criminal activity. Prisons are already crime schools; giving people an alternative vocation can only help.

  54. Common mistake or recycled code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same miscalculation happened in Nebraska in 2014.
    https://www.rt.com/usa/169080-nebraska-inmates-release-mistake/

  55. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because the courts don't have enough to do and the poor lawyers are on the breadline and most ex-cons trying to make an honest living are just rolling in money and free time...

  56. Defective by design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, who can say if this wasn't deliberate, because of bullshit tack-on charges that create hideous multipliers for otherwise non-serious crimes?

    I say buy that dev a beer...

  57. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Could they sue? Time and money invested in building a new life up wasted due to the incompetence of the state. Compensation for loss of job, property etc.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  58. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's where you can get a public defender. It may surprise you to learn that there is many places where you can't even get a public defender unless you are facing felony charges. Sometimes, they even make it so that you're essentially agreeing to face felony charges just to get represented. No I'm not exaggerating. Yes in the United States. That Law and Order TV crap is totally fake. Nothing remotely fair like that ever goes on in courts.

  59. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

    The tough on crime crowd, also known as the board of directors of for-profit prisons

    Actually the people who put the biggest lobbying pressure on being "tough on crime" are the prison guard unions, and indeed, there's a lot of scandal and coverup involved in it too.

    http://mic.com/articles/41531/...
    http://www.nationalreview.com/...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    In fact, in a lot of states they're the biggest one pushing against legalization of Marijuana. Why? Because it gives them LOTS of job security, perhaps more so than any other crime. But, don't let the pro union types hear this, or else you'll get an earful about how unions are in it to protect the working man...

  60. I am pretty sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There will be suicides.

  61. thread hijack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The God of the bible neither demands nor encourages the use of incarceration as a form of punishment.

    1. Re:thread hijack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Bible? The old one just says to cut something off or kill them and be done with it. The new one says to just forgive them and move on. Neither is really appropriate.

  62. In time for the Black Lives Matter rally by spkay31 · · Score: 1

    Merry Christmas America!

  63. Re:They should fight it out in court befor going b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With what money are they going to hire a lawyer to do that?

    Class action. Some lawyer will take up this case.