Slashdot Mirror
Copyright Expires On Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf
HughPickens.com writes: Adolf Hitler's Nazi manifesto Mein Kampf was originally printed in 1925 — eight years before Hitler came to power. After Nazi Germany was defeated in 1945, the Allied forces handed the copyright to the book to the state of Bavaria who refused to allow the book to be reprinted to prevent incitement of hatred. Now BBC reports that under European copyright law, the rights of an author of a literary or artistic work runs for the life of the author and for 70 years after his death — in Hitler's case on 30 April 1945, when he shot himself in his bunker in Berlin, so for the first time in 70 years, Mein Kampf will be available to buy in Germany.
Authorizing the book's release into the public domain has been a tortuous process. In 2012 it was agreed, after much consultation between Bavarian authorities and representatives of Jewish and Roma communities, that a scholarly edition should be planned in an attempt to demystify the book. Munich's Institute of Contemporary History will publish the new edition with thousands of academic notes, will aim to show that Mein Kampf (My Struggle) is incoherent and badly written, rather than powerful or seductive. From the original book's 1,000 pages, the publisher has produced a two-volume book that is twice as long as the original, with 3,700 annotations. Christian Hartmann, one of the team of five historians who spent several years working on the academic edition, described his relief at being able to analyze the text, even if he felt in need of regularly airing his tiny Munich office in order to cope with the task. "It is a real feeling of triumph, to be able to pick over this rubbish and then to debunk it bit by bit."
Authorizing the book's release into the public domain has been a tortuous process. In 2012 it was agreed, after much consultation between Bavarian authorities and representatives of Jewish and Roma communities, that a scholarly edition should be planned in an attempt to demystify the book. Munich's Institute of Contemporary History will publish the new edition with thousands of academic notes, will aim to show that Mein Kampf (My Struggle) is incoherent and badly written, rather than powerful or seductive. From the original book's 1,000 pages, the publisher has produced a two-volume book that is twice as long as the original, with 3,700 annotations. Christian Hartmann, one of the team of five historians who spent several years working on the academic edition, described his relief at being able to analyze the text, even if he felt in need of regularly airing his tiny Munich office in order to cope with the task. "It is a real feeling of triumph, to be able to pick over this rubbish and then to debunk it bit by bit."
Why the fuzz over this old book?
The book has been available in almost all countries except Germany, it is available on Amazon in both German and English, and it is of course available on the Internet, e.g. on www.hitler.org. Anyone interested in Mein Kampf can read it for free or for a few dollars. It hasn't caused a neo-nazi uprise anywhere so far, and it won't even if it is published in Germany.
I don't get it.
This is about copyrights actually expiring thus "unlocking" the material from the equivalent of the Disney Vault (_citation_) so to speak; oh, if I only had a dollar for every person on Earth that does not know copyrights have an expiration date...
That being said, in still Pre-TPP Canada, our expiration date is "only" half a century after the entire remaining lifespan of the author, so in this (and in many, many others) Mein Kampf has been in the public domain for two decades, and I don't see a large National Socialist Canadian Worker's Party.
When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
Why would he be considered more than an editor at best? It is not The Diary of Otto Frank, or The Diary of Anne Frank and her father Otto Frank, it is The Diary of Anne Frank. He may have censored some of her adolescent sexual thoughts, but he didn't create any new content for the diary, he only removed existing.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Have you read it? It's the mindless ramblings of a delusional madman with a combination of a persecution- and superiority complex.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I agree - just publish it. If you're afraid that the population will be seduced by it, you have bigger problems than the book.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
To be clear: there are two Anne Frank Foundations, both founded by her dad Otto. The Swiss Anne Frank Fonds which owns the copyrights to the diary, and the Dutch Anne Frank Stichting which amongst other things manages the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam. The Fonds claims that the father is co-author and that this means their copyright holds until 70 years after his death. The Stichting disputes the claim that Anne's father should be considered a co-author.
One copyright expert has said that the claim of the Fonds has no legal basis whatsoever: a court will first have to recognize Otto as co-author, and it is very unlikely that they will do so for the original diary. Until that happens, they can not continue to claim copyright. One exception may be certain parts of the diary that have been published in 1986. Back then, copyright law in several European countries protected a work for 50 years after its first publication instead of until 70 years after the author's death.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
You know who else wrote a book? Hilter!
This is free beer vs free speech personified. Why should we have to pirate what should belong to the world?
It's the mindless ramblings of a delusional madman with a combination of a persecution- and superiority complex.
Are you referring to Trumps book or Hitlers book?