Slashdot Mirror


ATF Puts Up Surveillance Cameras Around Seattle ... To Catch Illegal Grease Dump (muckrock.com)

v3rgEz writes: Last summer, Seattleites noticed that utility poles around town were showing some odd growths: A raft of surveillance cameras that, under Seattle's strict surveillance equipment laws, shouldn't have been there without disclosure and monitoring. But Seattle Police said that they weren't theirs, and one enterprising citizen followed up with a series of public records requests, only to discover that they were actually the ATF's cameras — on the watch for grease dumpers. Now the requester is fighting for the full list of federal surveillance watching over Seattle, and answers to how often federal agencies pursue what appear to be purely local crimes.

189 comments

  1. Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't they sell it instead of dumping it?

  2. Polls by alzoron · · Score: 4, Funny

    What kinds of questions are on these odd, growth afflicted, utility polls?

  3. Slippery criminals... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Dumping grease on the grass, so we got to set up cameras and catch the slimy devils.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Slippery criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      maybe this surveilance slope wouldn't be so slippery if you stopped illegally dumping grease on it!

    2. Re:Slippery criminals... by bobbied · · Score: 3, Funny

      Darn, they slipped away!

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Slippery criminals... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Why is the ATF after this crime? Since ATF stands for Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, which of these covers the misuse of grease?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  4. ATF? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms interested in illegal grease dumping? Illicit grease disposal is a potential environmental, water quality, and combustion hazard issue; but that's more the EPA's thing, perhaps local authorities, maybe FBI if it's a interstate conspiracy.

    Does somebody think that Tyler Durden is skimming off the grease to manufacture nitroglycerin for Project Mayhem and his anarcho-primitivist insurgency?

    1. Re:ATF? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The BATFE started as a taxing agency, and is now a law enforcement agency, but should really just be a convenience store ....

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:ATF? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Mod informative for telling us what ATF stands for, unlike the summary.

    3. Re:ATF? by bobbied · · Score: 2

      It's ATFE now.... And it's the "E" part that gets them interested in kitchen grease. However how illegal dumping of same is that interesting to them is beyond me..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:ATF? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Informative

      It probably isn't. The article does kinda sorta make that claim, but has no evidence whatsoever to back up the link. It actually appears to be saying that someone is using the ATF's cameras to conduct a grease dumping investigation, not that the ATF is itself conducting the investigation.

      The facts seem to be:

      - The ATF, FBI, and other Federal agencies have set up the cameras.
      - Someone (TFA says ATF, but that's not believable and they offer nothing to back that up) is conducting a grease dumping investigation. They have access to these cameras set up by the FBI and ATF.
      - The ATF themselves say the cameras they've put up were originally for a single investigation. They have been linked to a gun violence program in Seattle, so it is more than likely their investigation is linked to that.
      - The ATF has emphatically not claimed its doing a grease investigation anywhere, which makes no sense.

      It's a confusing article, but it doesn't really make the claim the headline does.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automatic Transmission Fluid

    6. Re:ATF? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yes I am aware I contradicted myself, that's what comes of researching while writing a comment rather than doing the research first ;-)

      Anyway, no, TFA does not say that the ATF is trying to catch illegal grease dumpers, only that someone is using the ATF's (and FBI's) cameras for that purpose.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATF = After the Fire. Not sure where the booze, guns and cigarettes come into play.

    8. Re:ATF? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      in theory you can make a lot of stuff around the city flammable by dumping grease on it

    9. Re:ATF? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      Why is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms interested in illegal grease dumping? Illicit grease disposal is a potential environmental, water quality, and combustion hazard issue; but that's more the EPA's thing, perhaps local authorities, maybe FBI if it's a interstate conspiracy.

      From TFA, it looks like it may simply be a case of "So you can't put a camera on your own? Well, we can help you by putting up a camera and sharing the results..." to build interagency trust and cooperation.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    10. Re:ATF? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Alchohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives... your ONE STOP PARTY STORE!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    11. Re:ATF? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      If they are interested in gun violence, what they need are lots of microphones. Then they can easily triangulate the location of any gunfire noise based on the time it takes to reach each microphone. Of course, it probably can't distinguish a firework from a gun, but both are monitored by BATFE, so it would be withing their purview.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    12. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps someone is distributing this to others so they can refine it into 3D printer media before they print weapons.

    13. Re:ATF? by radiumsoup · · Score: 2

      part of the ATF requirements for being a manufacturer in firearms/explosives or being an alcoholic drink producer is certifying there are appropriate controls in place to prevent contamination of navigable waters. If the ATF really is involved in this, then it's likely that some other investigation has uncovered a connection between a licensee and the greasy substance that is contaminating the water supply, and the ATF is trying to collect more evidence to see if they lied on the certification (it's ATF forms 5000.29 and 5000.30). Lying to the ATF is a Federal felony, and they are very interested in making sure people know they don't take kindly to being lied to.

      see: https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...

    14. Re:ATF? by Falos · · Score: 1

      All Terrain Fiesta

    15. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, that's why it makes no sense whatsoever.

      The government not wasting money by sharing resources already in place?

      Utter nonsense!

    16. Re:ATF? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The E stands for Explosives, not "Environment" or something similar that would pertain to disposal of non-explosive waste like unprocessed grease.

      (In any case, it looks like there's nothing to suggest the ATF is actually doing an investigation into grease disposal, just that their cameras might be being used by a third party for that purpose.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:ATF? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I know what the "E" stands for, sorry if that wasn't clear....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    18. Re:ATF? by pmocek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms interested in illegal grease dumping?

      I'm the Seattleite who dug up those records. ATF were likely not interested in people dumping grease. Seattle City Light were, because it was damaging their equipment. Since security manager Doug Williams at SCL regularly lets ATF and other agencies covertly install surveillance cameras on SCL's poles (which I learned by reading e-mails to and from him I received via Washington Public Records Act request), ATF were likely paying back the favor.

    19. Re:ATF? by pmocek · · Score: 2

      ATF and others have multiple surveillance cameras on Seattle City Light poles. In the 2011 grease-dumping investigation, SCL contacted ATF to request that they install cameras so that SCL could catch the dumpers. I learned this by reading e-mails to and from SCL, mostly to security manager Doug Williams, I received via Public Records Act request.

    20. Re:ATF? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      The BATFE started as a taxing agency, and is now a law enforcement agency, but should really just be a convenience store ....

      I agree.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    21. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms interested in illegal grease dumping? Illicit grease disposal is a potential environmental, water quality, and combustion hazard issue; but that's more the EPA's thing, perhaps local authorities, maybe FBI if it's a interstate conspiracy. Does somebody think that Tyler Durden is skimming off the grease to manufacture nitroglycerin for Project Mayhem and his anarcho-primitivist insurgency?

      The answer is clear. They are lying. That's it. They ARENT worried about grease, they are looking for or monitoring something else. Grease is an excuse.

      That stuff is locked up in most places due to theft from the tanks. It's valuable. Nobody would be dumping it.

      Though, I concede that it might be petroleum grease they are worried about. (But again, you can recycle that and make a profit.)

    22. Re:ATF? by jdharm · · Score: 1

      Alcohol, Tacos, and French fries

    23. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? Where did you dig? how many feet down? did you use a shovel? why would the ATF bury records anyway?

    24. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had five hours to come up with a witty response and that's the best you could come up with? You're going to have to repeat the class, buddy.

    25. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms interested in illegal grease dumping?

      They aren't, this is just the "official" story to placate the plebs.

    26. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are interested in gun violence, you replace the gunpowder in a lot of bullets with C4, or something else with more boom that gun powder. Then you flood the illegal criminal underworld with cheap, hot (stolen) ammo, while you invest in hooks. (The kind of hooks that replace lost hands).

    27. Re:ATF? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I agree, I was puzzling for a bit trying to figure out if it were some local acronym. Seattle's Agriculture Task Force or something which would be justified in trying to catch grease dumpers. Knowing it was the federal Bureau is important.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    28. Re:ATF? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I've had an affinity for both your username and your signature for quite some time. It goes without saying that I concur.

      As I don't wear camouflage, a trucker's hat, have any NRA clothing, or even have a gun rack in any vehicles, I'm pretty sure that some folks here would leave a wet spot on the floor if they ever saw my basement. I've a separate room that's all concrete on all four sides and has a steel door that has its frame embedded into the concrete. Inside that room are a number of safes, crates, and ammo boxes. Inside those are any one of a number of things that can hurt you - so be careful, that's why they're locked in that room.

      At any rate, after they got done pissing in their knickers they'd probably try calling the BATFE. Amusingly enough, I have my teeth, can read, can write, have a PhD, am not even mostly white, and hold a political view a bit to the left of most elected officials. I'm not really sure what happened to people to make them so afraid. There's something to be said for having the chance to make things go boom and to go mass murdering innocent bits of paper. The alcohol and tobacco just make it all the more enjoyable.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    29. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Grease

    30. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they interested in my asshole too? There are fairly frequent explosions of flammable gas coming out of it.

    31. Re:ATF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LIAR! Stop claiming credit for my hard work.

  5. Wait, *what*? by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Grease dumping? Grease dumping?

    1) How the hell does that fall under the ATF's jurisdiction?
    2) Who dumps something they can sell as a (heating) fuel?
    3) Does Seattle actually have that much of a problem with french fries that they need federal intervention?
    4) Why can't you dump a biodegradable substance? Better bulldozed into an empty lot than rotting in a landfill for 150 years...

    1. Re:Wait, *what*? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      5) Who would actually take their cover-story at face value?

      It doesn't pass the smell test.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re: Wait, *what*? by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      Modern landfills don't rot. They are quite tightly sealed, layer by layer, for the by products of rot and break down are what cause long term problems. Stuff You Should Know has a great podcast on the subject.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:Wait, *what*? by bobbied · · Score: 3, Funny

      It doesn't pass the smell test.

      Neither does the grease...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Wait, *what*? by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1) How the hell does that fall under the ATF's jurisdiction?

      I am sure it isn't but when in recent memory has that stopped a federal agency from doing anything. People talk a lot about waste fraud and abuse. Then the big government advocates say how import $AGENCY'S mission is and how it can't meet its obligations as it is. I wonder how much waste there is in duplication of effort, equipment, and training. Wow all that before we even get started on the civil liberties, rule of law, and accountability issues. We should all be calling our representatives demanding Sequestration 2.0 get started immediate, its the anything that has worked.

      2) Who dumps something they can sell as a (heating) fuel?

      Lots of people when oil hits $32 dollars a barrel. You probably can't economically process that used grease enough that the EPA would let you burn it, at these prices. Naturally this discounts the overall environmental impacts of shipping cleaner fuel in from elsewhere and the associated production impacts. Hey its clearing at the point you burn it though, big brother knows best.

      3) Does Seattle actually have that much of a problem with french fries that they need federal intervention?

      Probably not but FEDs want to play with their tax payer funded toys.

      4) Why can't you dump a biodegradable substance? Better bulldozed into an empty lot than rotting in a landfill for 150 years...

      See 2.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Wait, *what*? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I had the same question about the BATF and the feds generally; but my understanding is that commercial-scale grease disposal is a matter of some concern to municipalities because of what it tends to do to sewer systems. Either by itself, or combined with assorted debris, fat/grease/oil mixtures are prone to clumping and clinging to piping, are obviously not very water soluble, and don't decay fast enough to be self cleaning. For those reasons, grease traps are usually required for sources larger than minor residential stuff; and somebody has the joyful job of collecting the ghastly mess that collects in grease traps from time to time.

      As for the economics of dumping vs. recycling/reprocessing, I don't know how it shakes down, probably depends on what fuel costs are doing and how much lipid sources that need less purification cost. My naive assumption would be that, once you've gone to the trouble of collecting the stuff from multiple locations, there is probably somebody who will at least take it off your hands for you; but individual restaurant operators looking to cut costs may have an incentive to quietly empty their own grease trap into the nearest drainage ditch when nobody is looking.

    6. Re: Wait, *what*? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not entirely state-of-the-art information. Current landfill technique is to indeed seal the contents from the groundwater - but they now encourage the contents to rot. In the 80s, they developed a technique of burying in layers, putting down a membrane, and then putting down another layer, etc. until the landfill is "full". At that point they cap it. Anything that leaches out of the bottom is hauled to a treatment plant. Over the last 10 years, they have modified this technique. Now between each layer they take the leech water and pour it back over the landfill. This encourages the landfill itself to become bio-reactive and to eat the nutrients in the leech water. They pretty much do this until the leech water runs more or less clear, and then they move on to the next step. This has several benefits:
      1. Future leech water is much less nasty
      2. Volume is reduced significantly, so more trash will fit.
      3. It encourages methane production, which is captured and often used onsite or burned rather than slowly released into the atmosphere.

      This - along with much improved recycling - is why we don't hear much about "running out of landfill space" anymore like we did in the 80s and 90s.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Wait, *what*? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything after 1) is completely irrelevant.

      Why would anybody believe that the ATF is even investigating illegal grease dumping into municipal sewers? You might as well expect me to believe the FBI is actively investigating people who don't mow their lawns or who spit on sidewalks.

      It's completely implausible.

      Yes, crap clogging sewers is a real thing. But this has nothing to do with a federal agency putting up surveillance cameras and then coming up with a bogus cover story for it.

      This is the Men in Black saying "Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus" ... it's a cheap cover story, by agencies who won't admit to what they're really doing.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Wait, *what*? by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      4) because it's illegal under most laws. It can cause problems, especially if it ends up in waterways or storm drains.

      As for the rest that's a damned good question. It used to be that if you owned a restaurant you had to pay for grease pickup. Then individuals and eventually haulers starting doing it for free. These days it works the other way around, or it did (not sure since oil prices fell through the floor). They bought it and resold it for use in bio fuels. People steeling restaurant grease is (was?) am actual problem in the past few years.

      This is all assuming we are talking about fryer grease. If it's a petroleum product then all this goes out the window, except why in the hell this is an ATF problem.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    9. Re:Wait, *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but given the potential sewer system effects wouldn't that make it more EPA's territory than ATF?

    10. Re:Wait, *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the grease seeps across state lines?

    11. Re: Wait, *what*? by swb · · Score: 1

      I have a client who runs a waste-to-energy plant. They sort and shred trash to produce a burnable product for some power plants setup to handle it.

      My contact says it's actually cheaper for haulers to landfill the trash. Currently the two counties involved in the plant require haulers to send their trash to the plant, but pay a subsidy to make up the difference.

    12. Re: Wait, *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not only used on site, or burned, Around here, all the city buses run on gas mostly extracted from the landfills,

    13. Re:Wait, *what*? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      4) Why can't you dump a biodegradable substance? Better bulldozed into an empty lot than rotting in a landfill for 150 years...

      Bacon grease may be biodegradable, but try dumping that shit down your kitchen sink next time. Let me know how that goes.

      London has had problems with fatbergs for a while.

    14. Re:Wait, *what*? by pmocek · · Score: 1

      How the hell does that fall under the ATF's jurisdiction?

      It doesn't. Seattle City Light requested that ATF install the cameras. SCL likely don't have their own, and their security manager, Doug Williams, regularly allows ATF to secretly install cameras on SCL poles, so when he wants some installed, he just calls his buddies at ATF.

    15. Re:Wait, *what*? by pmocek · · Score: 2

      Why would anybody believe that the ATF is even investigating illegal grease dumping into municipal sewers?

      I and received e-mails that show Seattle City Light staff requesting that ATF install a camera on an SCL pole. Why would they go to ATF? Because ATF owe them a favor or two for all the times SCL let ATF secretly install cameras on SCL poles for ATF's purposes. SCL security manager Doug Williams keeps a list of those. I've received an improperly-redacted installment of my request for present and past versions of that list.

    16. Re: Wait, *what*? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      My municipality tried something like this.

      It failed to generate more energy that it consumed, it polluted like mad, and after a couple of years the city cancelled the contract and the company who had claimed they could do all of this went bankrupt.

      There was no way to make it economical or compliant with emissions regulations.

      It sounds great, but in practice these things don't really seem to work worth a damn.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    17. Re: Wait, *what*? by swb · · Score: 1

      The county I live in actually has a garbage-to-electricity system. I think the energy side of it works fine, it's the economics of it I wonder about it.

      Supposedly they're widely used in Europe where land for landfilling is more scarce.

    18. Re: Wait, *what*? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I may have overstated things a bit. The landfill I'm most familiar with does this, but it's not yet standard. Apparently only the newest and/or most experimental landfills are taking these measures. There are perhaps a dozen.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re: Wait, *what*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do this locally here with good results, so good in fact that they now occasionally import trash when the local trash isn't enough.

      By all accounts, it's a huge success... what did you guys do wrong?

  6. Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by interval1066 · · Score: 2

    I guess its been a huge problem for a while: http://www.seattlepi.com/local...

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    1. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by afidel · · Score: 1

      $1500 to clean a backup, is this an all week job or are they waiting to take those calls on holiday weekends where a crew of 5 is getting triple overtime?!?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by ibpooks · · Score: 2

      I'm sure that in addition to labor a good portion of that comes from the cost of buying, maintaining and operating equipment such as vacuum trucks and backhoes needed for sewer work.

    3. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by afidel · · Score: 2

      Ah so they're amatorizing equipment they already need over a few instances to intentionally inflate the cost of those instances, so basically cop math.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by lbmouse · · Score: 2

      So the ATF is now concerned about how well I scrape my plates before washing them?

    5. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But putting in grease traps would take away these hardworking Americans jobs!

    6. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by PPH · · Score: 1

      But the ATF is watching for people pouring it out on the ground, not down the drain. Perhaps we could put the CIA in the sewers to watch for illegal grease flushing.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You've not actually hired specialty laborers lately, have you? It's not uncommon to have a burdened labor rate of $60-70/hr, and a minimum crew of three. Add to that the charge for the equipment (go price the daily rental of large hardware at a rental center), plus the dumping and proper disposal fees. Don't forget to add the cost of the crew to wait for a local building, sewer, or health official to check the repair and sign off on the work. Shit gets expensive quickly.

      And, to be honest, you wouldn't get me to clean out a commercial grease trap for $1500. That shit is nasty.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Yeah I remember a episode of 'tough jobs' or something like that where he went with the sewer guy. He made it through cleaning a septic tank okay- but then they had to clean out a grease plugged sewer by a school. Guy started instantly gagging and throwing up.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    9. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I know of a case in SF were a Chinese restaurant thought they had an underground storage tank for waste grease. Turns out they had an access manhole for a buried electric substation.

      The transformers kept the grease nice and warm for the year or so it took to fill. I bet that really stunk.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Grease is Clogging Seattle Sewers by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      not a backup at the lateral, a backup in the main line, so they have to dig the fucker up first.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  7. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

    You still need to refine and filter used grease to make bio diesel. That costs money on the small scale and oil prices have been dropping lately.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  8. So basically a way to say FU to the citizens by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We'll just get the feds to do all the monitoring and share their information because they don't have to listen to the local ordinance. It's like the local departments that use the federal civil forfeiture rules when their city or state tells them they can't steal from their citizens anymore. I wish federal courts would start smacking departments that do this hard, both collectively and individual officers and higher.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  9. Bullshit ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF does the ATF have to do with illegal grease dumping? What's that? Nothing at all?

    They have neither the jurisdiction nor the interest in these crimes. If they're claiming it's for policing this kind of stuff, it's a big fucking lie.

    This is just making shit up to allow them to put up cameras, against local laws, and then refuse to explain what the hell they're doing.

    Yet more evidence that law enforcement doesn't give a crap about the law.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Bullshit ... by wired_parrot · · Score: 1

      While people are quick to pick on the ATF, and I don't defend them for installing surveillance cameras, if you read the article they were actually the only ones to explain what they were doing. However, they only seemed to be responsible for a handful of the cameras

      The vast majority of the cameras belong to other agencies - FBI, local police departments - and neither they nor the local utility company on whose poles they are installed would offer any explanation, asides from providing a heavily redacted spreadsheet informing that the existence of other cameras are exempt from disclosure due to ongoing investigations. This, despite the cameras themselves being viewable from the street.

    2. Re:Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 Insightful my ass. If there is an interagency agreement for logistical support between the ATF and or the EPA and the US Army Corps of Engineers (executive agencies operating under congressional authorization and an arm of the DOD respectively), then their activities are perfectly legal, since storm sewers drain to the navigable waters of the US and are therefore under the lawful jurisdiction of the federal government.

      Furthermore, a municipal ordinance of the city of Seattle (an agencyof the state of Washington) has zero effect on the activities of the federal government under the Supremacy clause of the US Constitution and subsequent jurisprudence.

      It's funny how many "constitutional scholars" there are on /. when it comes to interpretations of the 2nd Amendment who can't be chuffed to read any of the other parts of the Constitution.

    3. Re:Bullshit ... by pmocek · · Score: 1

      This is just making shit up to allow them to put up cameras, against local laws, and then refuse to explain what the hell they're doing.

      Seattle's surveillance equipment ordinance was enacted after the SCL-ATF grease dumping incident. But SCL are still allowing ATF to secretly install cameras on SCL poles.

  10. Somewhat reasonable if you think about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the ATF is monitoring the sewers for secret bomb makers, dumping cooking grease into a storm drain would create a false positive. Watch fight club if you don't understand how to make explosives from used fat. Restaurants are supposed to have grease traps to prevent grease from going into the sewer in large quantities, but those cost money to clean out. It is common for low end restaurants to illegally dump their grease. Installing a camera to see if it is restaurant employees are dumping grease straight into the sewer drain seems more reasonable than A. a stake out with people in a car for X weeks until the grease dumped is discovered or B. a military style raid based on a false positive. But that doesn't mean people shouldn't question it, just that there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for the ATF to be interested in illegal grease dumping, ie eliminating a false positive.

    1. Re:Somewhat reasonable if you think about it. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      If you were into making explosives from grease perhaps you would buy new grease?, instead of scrapping smelly, sticky substances mixed with excrements and used toilet paper from a tunnel that would have trouble fitting a Vietcong midget.

      In fact even working with raw and clean human excrements would be better than that, if you have some process to exploit the vast potential chemical energy left in it.

    2. Re:Somewhat reasonable if you think about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand. My hypothesis is the ATF is monitoring the sewers for bomb makers dumping their waste into the sewers, not that the bomb makers are getting their raw materials from the sewers. A restaurant dumping their grease into the sewer would release a large flood of glycerin and other chemicals, which would create a false positive, making it appear as if there was a clandestine bomb lab nearby, when in fact there was not.
       
      Also Seattle has a segregated sewer system so rain water and down the sink waste are not commingled in the street pipes, making dumping a chemical of any sort into the rain water drain that much more noticeable and traceable.

  11. The slippery slope becomes (near) literal by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Glad they only use surveillance to get terrorists. Lipid terrorism here

    1. Re:The slippery slope becomes (near) literal by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Lipid terrorism here

      You meant it as a joke, but in fact, it's not. Kitchen grease can be used to make nitroglycerin. Granted, you need to have nitric acid too, and that's probably easier to track.

    2. Re: The slippery slope becomes (near) literal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as every bombmaker knows, illegally dumped grease is way better than the free stuff you can pick up behind any local restaurant. The dirt and gravel makes all the difference when it explodes.

    3. Re:The slippery slope becomes (near) literal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are dumping any salad oil, this might even be Balsamic terror!

      That makes me lipid and I ate.

    4. Re:The slippery slope becomes (near) literal by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Mayhem. Soap.

  12. im sure word about this spread quickly by nimbius · · Score: 1

    thug on a phone: Yeah Tony look, we need to lay low for a bit...yeah....no I know its arriving this Saturday but see listen...those cameras? Yeah...on the pole at 23rd street Tony just look at em....of course! they know Tony...THEY know about the grease man its only a matter of time before they figure it....what?.....jesus christ Tony you're a genius.....Nobody would ever suspect it....yeah of course I've had McDonalds!

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  13. Stupid Seattlites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn that's one thing I hate about going into Seattle...

    This isn't a local crime. If someone is dumping greasy, it's a crime against the world and humanity. If it's not already, it should be a federal crime. I sure hope the EPA catches them and tosses the fuckers in jail for an extremely long time.

  14. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Tokolosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Grease = tryglycerides = fatty acids + glycerin
    Glycerin + Nitric acid = Nitroglycerin
    Nitroglycerin + diatomaceous earth = Dynamite
    Dynamite = Profit!

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  15. Who needs God? by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who needs God when you have Big Brother looking up your asshole?

    1. Re:Who needs God? by will_die · · Score: 1

      Stop putting grease up there and you will be fine.

  16. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It isn't too much of a surprise that the economics of producing biodiesel from used restaurant oil are shaky; and it also wouldn't be much of a surprise if on-site/near-site illicit dumping by individual operators looking to avoid paying for collection would be pretty common; but I am a little surprised that, if you are going to go to the trouble of collecting the stuff, it isn't economic to burn in less demanding applications.

    Coal-fired power plants, say, are much less picky about the details of the fuel than internal combustion engines or combined cycle gas turbines are(plus, given the sheer volume of coal involved, you could get rid of a lot of grease without changing the behavior of the fuel by much) since the fuel doesn't interact with the intricate moving parts; and whatever nasty mixture of grease, fried food scraps, carbony bits, etc. should release more energy when burned than it takes to get burning, and probably has lower sulfur, mercury, and similar contaminant levels.

    Near the coast, "bunker fuel" might also be an option. Since operating costs depend heavily on fuel costs, and there are few air quality regulations once you get out of port, large ships burn some of the nastiest dregs of oil refining that nobody else wants; because they are cheap and because it's easier to deal with very high viscosity fuels when you are operating large, purpose built, engines. Given the horrible crap that gets used, you might not even need to strain used grease for it to qualify as an improvement.

  17. simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a simple solution to this problem. Buy a paint ball gun, and go to town.

  18. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and it also wouldn't be much of a surprise if on-site/near-site illicit dumping by individual operators looking to avoid paying for collection would be pretty common

    Uh, restaurants get paid for their grease, this might not be the case right now since soybeans had a good year last year and crude is so cheap that biodiesel isn't going to be in high demand, but over the last 10+ years it's been the case. That's why people working on B90 conversions have to be sure to ask the restaurants before they take grease for their vehicle.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  19. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    The nitroglycerin can also be used to make nitrocellulose, and from there to smokeless powder, putting it squarely in the ATF's purview.

  20. First they came for the grease dumpers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .

  21. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Ah, What a wiz bang noble idea....

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  22. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I find it funny that Slashdotters aparently have never watched Fight Club, or they'd know this.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  23. Eeewwwww [Re:ATF?] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Must be really greasy tobacco.

  24. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    You do realize this is Seattle we are talking about. Burning anything has reams of environmental regulations that must be followed. California had a similar problem while I lived out there 2000-2006. The easiest solution was simply to drive out into the desert at night and dump what ever you were trying to get rid of since they made it such a pain in the ass to dispose of through more reasonable means.

  25. Here's how reality works by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

    Here's how it actually works.

    The BATF is old and outdated, whose duties should properly be broken up and parcelled out to more relevant federal agencies (FDA, FBI, and so on).

    Consequently, every couple of years they look for a big flashy bust that will put them in the news to justify their budget.

    And so in recent years the BATF has given us Ruby Ridge massacre, the siege at Waco, the "fast and furious" scandal (where the BATF gave guns to the Mexican drug cartels, said guns were later used to kill a US border patrol agent), amd so on and so on.

    So that's the situation. A worthless pack of screw-ups looking to justify their budget every couple of years.

    Look for some clueless McDonald's owner to get caught illegally dumping grease, and paraded in front of the cameras for a few months.

    The BATF is a stupid, worthless department(*) that was moved from the Treasury department to the Justice department as part of the Homeland Security act.

    (*) Here's a quote from Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.):

    “The ATF is a scandal-ridden, largely duplicative agency that lacks a clear mission. Its 'Framework' is an affront to the Second Amendment and yet another reason why Congress should pass the ATF Elimination Act,"

  26. Thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Understanding how an editor -- or anyone else -- could read "utility poll" without immediately correcting it, is quite beyond my capacity.

    1. Re:Thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like the editors read anything...

    2. Re:Thank you. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      What editor?

    3. Re:Thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What editor?

      Ostensibly, these guys, but it's been clear for a long time now that they don't edit or really do much of anything other than punch a clock.

    4. Re:Thank you. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain Slashdot uses highly-trained chimps as editors. They're much cheaper, and easier to clean up after! Unfortunately, they don't catch a lot of spelling errors.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:Thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you except for the highly-trained part.

    6. Re:Thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain Slashdot uses highly-trained chimps as editors.

      They train them? Judging by timothy's posts, they don't train them very well. In a real world test of the infinite monkey theorem, timothy would be one of the editors urinating and defecating on the keyboard.

  27. Re: Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ITYM "Nobel "

  28. Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

    ... is not a "purely local crime". Those unruly rivers have a nasty tendency to flow right past State boundaries.

    1. Re:Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by PPH · · Score: 2

      flow right past State boundaries.

      Not in Seattle.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Because the Pacific ocean doesn't touch anywhere but Washinton State?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by Beavertank · · Score: 1

      It does seem strange that it would be the ATF doing the surveillance, though.

      I get that they probably have expertise in surveillance that (say) the EPA may be lacking, but it wasn't the EPA (or any other federal agency) that asked for the ATF's help, it seems to have been law enforcement of some kind. Which makes me think this was an effort by local law enforcement to avoid the disclosure requirements that local law imposes on them.

    4. Re:Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by PPH · · Score: 1

      International waters. Under the jurisdiction of UNCLOS (to which we are not a party).

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Seattle is on the Puget Sound, fully within the enclosed Navigable waters of the US and thus under the jurisdiction of the US federal government. Also, territorial waters extend out to 12 miles, the contiguous zone goes to 24, and the EEZ goes to the 200. All concepts recognized under the treaty, and under the US law and Maritime policy, UNCLOS signatory or not.

    6. Re:Dumping grease in the rivers and oceans ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not, the grease is damaging City Light poles, and City Light has a history of letting the ATF put cameras on their poles for ATF busts, so now they go back and say hey could you put up some of your cameras to help us out with our own problem? and the ATF is like sure bro, can do! thanks for letting us use free space on your poles all those other times.

  29. Catch other dumpers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the ATF can help us catch the idiots that dump old couches, broken dishwashers, and old tires along the roads too? Since apparently they are watching us anyway?

    1. Re:Catch other dumpers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can stop it.
      All you need to do is petition and vote in people to local government that support tax base funded trash pickup with regular 'clean up' drives that allow free bulk item haul away. My area does this a couple times a year.

      I lived on the coast where you had to personally pay to have trash picked up in even a very large city. Guess what? Fucking trash everywhere. Trash bags busted open on the side of the highway. Couches and broken TV's just randomly dumped in parking lots, etc. It was gross, and also an embarrassment.

      Moved back to the Midwest in an area where trash is paid by property/local taxes and guess what? Clean, no shit everywhere, and you almost never hear of or see anyone dumping shit.

      Basic trash removal I believe should be one of the foundation services of a properly functioning government.
      If your government can't clean up literal shit what is it there for?

  30. ATFE should be abolished by schwit1 · · Score: 0
    It serves no purpose being an independent agency.

    Firearms and Explosives => FBI
    Alcohol and tobacco => FDA

  31. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a stretch. There's better ways to accomplish that without leaving a trail. Surveillance is just getting more and more pervasive. I shudder to think what it will be like in a couple of decades. Just think how safe we'd all be if everyone wore a tracking device where our benevolent leaders could know where we were and what we were doing at any time. Glorious.

  32. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Grease can also be used as an animal feed supplement. My chickens love bacon grease, or used frying oil mixed with their feed. I don't understand why anyone would just dump perfectly good grease. It should be easy to find someone to take it, and possibly even pay for it.

    My guess is that the grease is just a cover story, and the real purpose of the cameras is something else entirely.

  33. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Biodiesel is a huge win on smallish boats. Diesel fumes make many people sick. Biodiesel fumes just make people want to eat french fries.

  34. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    The nitroglycerin can also be used to make nitrocellulose

    Actually, nitrocellulose is made from ... cellulose. So the government should be watching for anyone using wood or paper.

  35. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Couldn't they sell it instead of dumping it?

    They would probably make a lot more selling all the bullshit in that "We're just looking for grease dumpers" story as fertilizer.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  36. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My guess is that you're a paranoid anti-government dope, who spins trying to catch polluters into a nefarious plot.

  37. The faster way by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    Sabotage the camera (if you don't want to do actual damage, tape a laser pointer to a sign post and flood the lens with light, spray the lens using your drone, float a helium balloon in front of it, etc.), wait to see who comes to repair it, then follow them back to their office.

    1. Re:The faster way by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      What, you don't think the ATF uses CONTRACTORS?

  38. No restaurant at 23rd/Union. Just a pot store. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no restaurant at 23rd and Union. However, there is a fairly high-profile, legal pot store. Weird. But yeah, back to talking about grease dumping.

    https://goo.gl/maps/QJB8HFGPGjA2

  39. Creative, at least by Beavertank · · Score: 2

    That seems like a... unique way to get around local surveillance disclosure laws: Ask the feds to do the surveillance for you, and just piggy back on them. It's a disingenuous attempt to circumvent the law, sure, but it is awfully creative.

  40. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ask yourself why the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms is hunting down grease dumping instead of, say, the EPA?

  41. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that there is a lot of water in the grease that would be hard to remove and would make it hard to burn also.

  42. Re: Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much. Unless people are making alcohol, firearms, or Tabacco out of the grease I don't see why they are involved.

  43. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Funny

    OMG!!! BACON flavored EGGS!!!
    How do your chickens feel about hash brown potatoes?
    This could be big, eliminate two items from breakfast but still have the same arterial clogging.
    Find a statin manufacturer and apply for a grant right away.

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  44. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by drewsup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yup, when asked why they were there, someone thought fast..." Yes, it's to catch.......grease dumpers..... Ya thats what they're for...grease dumpers......Because there are not laws against catching grease dumpers are there.....

  45. What they meant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they are monitoring for grease payments .

  46. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Waste oil burning heaters are very simple and easy. you can easily use this stuff and burn it cleanly to generate power, hot water, or even just heat for a building.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  47. there is surveillance equipment all over wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in sw washingtion (vancouver) and there are military grade surveillance equipment on almost every intersection. Black bubble cameras and big flat plates aimed at the roadways. It looks like they are connected with some kind of wifi.

  48. Opposite Day by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    If anything, the problem now is Grease THEIVES, swiping it to use in their own diesels or fencing it.

    The degree of law-breaking by a federal agency is proportional to the level of pathetic bullshit offered as cover.

  49. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually once you get to the nitroglycerin step you are squarely in the ATF's purview, since they regulate explosives. "ATF" is an anachronistic acronym; since 1970 agency's full actual name is "The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives".

    But glycerin is a commonplace an innocuous chemical widely used in cosmetics and food; you can buy it by the barrel without raising any eyebrows. It makes no sense to reason that fats are under the purview of ATF because you can produce glycerin from it.

    I tried to google the source of the grease story, and it appears that back in 2011 SCL asked for ATF's technical assistance in tracking down grease dumpers, but that the camera placements currently in question are for use in a current investigation by the Puget Sound Regional Crime Gun Task Force.

    So no big mystery about why the ATF is tracking down grease dumpers, that's just a misreading of the evidence trail.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  50. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unlikely. Getting your oil up to 350 degrees gets rid of the water content pretty fast. Throwing it into a diesel engine makes the water content insignificant.

  51. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the ATF's interest in grease, of all things?

  52. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

    They may already be watching. Better file that FOIA request.

    --
    Pull my finger for my public key.
  53. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alcohol, Tobacco, and Fryers?

  54. Greasy marijuana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    far more likely. Why would ATF be involved. It's the weed ya'll.

  55. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't normally respond to ACs, but the closest link I could think of is that the BATF is actually the BATFE today, they added in explosives a while ago.

    One of the ingredients of your standard 'fertilizer bomb' is generally diesel, but most high-lipid sources would do.

    That being said, it's the other half of the bomb formula that's actually hard to get, as opposed to pulling up to any fueling station with some yellow cans. Well, the color doesn't really matter, but yellow is the convention for diesel.

    Still, as you say, this is an overreach by the ATF, and should have been done by the EPA in concert with local authorities.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  56. Don't forget Ammonium Nitrate by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Add it to Ammonium Nitrate and you get ANFO, a different explosive.

    Still, it's the Nitrates that get people's attention, you can buy diesel pretty much anywhere.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Don't forget Ammonium Nitrate by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      Ammonium Nitrate and diesel. Favourite recipe from the IRA cookbook.

  57. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on how much you like your car. Mythbusters tested unaltered (well they ran it through some coffee filters) cooking oil in a diesel car and it ran fine. I imagine over time it would clog components and cause some nasty deposits but who knows, maybe simply running some normal diesel and some of those "gum out" additives might clean it out. There would be one big limitation, running it in winter would be a big no no. Normal diesel is bad enough at freezing in the lines in northern climates let alone cooking oil.

  58. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may also have to do with legalization... Want to keep tabs on those who purchase.

  59. Bodies are essentially 'grease' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps its more nefarious.. someone call Sherlock

  60. Unique for surveillance, but not unique otherwise by Firethorn · · Score: 2

    Look up "Civil Asset Forfeiture" and you'll see that local police departments have been 'teaming' up with the Feds for years to bypass local and state controls in order to seize money that they can funnel straight into their departments.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  61. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    This was my first thought. My neighbor built a big garage a couple of years ago and installed a waste oil burner for heat. So long as there aren't big bits of crap in the oil it will happily accept it. For cooking oil I just drive the moisture off (by using it to season my cast iron cook ware), filter it and add it to his tank. For motor oil, gear oil, transmission fluid, etc I just add them to his tank.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  62. Other than waging war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what else would be a criminal act that isn't local to where the crime took place???

  63. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who runs his VW Jetta on used cooking oil. During the winter, he has a small heating unit in the gas tank to prevent gelling.

    --
    Redundancy is good And also good.
  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by catmistake · · Score: 1

    It isn't too much of a surprise that the economics of producing biodiesel from used restaurant oil are shaky; and it also wouldn't be much of a surprise if on-site/near-site illicit dumping by individual operators looking to avoid paying for collection would be pretty common; but I am a little surprised that, if you are going to go to the trouble of collecting the stuff, it isn't economic to burn in less demanding applications.

    Could be that their fuel tax has something to do with it:

    With state gas taxes now up to 44.5 cents a gallon, adding in the current federal gas tax of 18.4 cents, the total per gallon gas tax in Washington is now 62.9 cents.

    A free barrel of grease used for fuel now costs $18.69 in Washington State.

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Hence the oldtimey term 'gun cotton.' Discovered, as I recall, when a chemist cleaned up a spill with an apron.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  68. Obviously Not by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

    The cameras are said to be use for some grease dumping project. That doesn't mean that they are. That's just a cover for whatever they are there for, looking for Meth labs or some such. Let's not go overboard on the wrong problems.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  69. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is that the grease is just a cover story, and the real purpose of the cameras is something else entirely.

    You are correct.

  70. ATFG by stimpleton · · Score: 1

    "The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives, and Grease"

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  71. I see you have a hamburger from Dick's with fries by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I see you have a greasy hamburger from Dick's and some fries.

    The computer is your friend. We are watching you. Don't smear grease on terminals, friend!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  72. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    the better question is what are they REALLY looking for. I dont buy this story that they are looking for grease in the slightest, its not their job

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  73. Conspiracy Theorists much? by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

    I love Slashdot. And when it comes to Law Enforcement matters, there sure are a lot of conspiracy theorists out there. Why are we so afraid of and dubious of Law Enforcement? I can't help but think, like many things and with many people, that a lack of real familiarity with Law Enforcement is to blame. Befriend a cop or an agent. Pick their brain. See: Occam's Razor.

    1. Re:Conspiracy Theorists much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell no. I see one of those guys, I turn the other direction. These days they shoot anyone and everyone including their pets. There is a good reason nobody trusts them anymore. They have become the true terrorists.

    2. Re:Conspiracy Theorists much? by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

      Where's your data? 700,000 cops in the United States. You could hear about a "bad" one on news everyday, and after a year that 365 "bad" officers would still only be .05% (not 5%, 1/20th of 1%) of them. And the news loves to show "bad" cops because it generates them money, even when the evidence later exonerates the cop of bad doing. Anyone who thinks there are no bad cops is naïve- there are bad cops. But anyone who believes that a few bad seeds represents the whole of 700k cops is a sheep, who gives their brain over to the media. Remember, numerators without denominators is pointless- as I said above, hearing "lots of cops are bad" is stupid unless you divide it by "but wait there are a ton and ton and ton and ton of cops." Also, most officers never fire a single shot in their entire 30 year career. If you think cop shootings are the norm, you're watching too much TV. In an entire 30 year career, on average less than 5% of cops ever shoot their gun ONCE at someone. Do your research. Don't be lead by emotion. Be more Vulcan and less Romulan.

  74. Re: Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Say hi to your smartphone

  75. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    It isn't too much of a surprise that the economics of producing biodiesel from used restaurant oil are shaky

    My guess is that you haven't even bothered to look at the economics of producing biodiesel from WVO.

    For small hobbyist-level winter-safe B100 refinement, the total costs amount to roughly $3/gal. Besides economies of scale, there are multiple ways to subsidize that, not least charging a modest fee for disposal including clean-up, and selling the glycerine to soap-makers and others. If you maintain the fleet which runs on the B100, the savings on maintenance costs also start to reveal themselves.

    Basically, you haven't got a clue, and you decided to tell the world.

    So if money is your driving factor you should convert from B100 to gasoline and save over 33%.

  76. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    You still need to refine and filter used grease to make bio diesel. That costs money on the small scale and oil prices have been dropping lately.

    Yet, theft of that type of grease is rampant around where I live. People steal grease then process it into fuel (or more likely, put it in their own dumpsters to make more money off the recyclers.)

    There are locks and security cameras pointing at them in a lot of places now.

  77. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    And diesel costs about $3.00 a gallon in the area, so using your own figures making biodiesel production a VERY shaky proposition. Why go to the considerable trouble and mess to make biodiesel when you can get it from the hose for the same price? Plus it won't freeze up on you at 32 degrees F. Biodiesel will, and it doesn't take that long. I had it happen to me when I ran Bio in my Duramax. You should have seen the fuel filter--completely clogged with a viscous mess.

    Perhaps it is you who does not have a clue here. The original poster is correct.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  78. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    It isn't too much of a surprise that the economics of producing biodiesel from used restaurant oil are shaky;

    That would be a fairly new phenomenon and still makes economic sense in many countries. Any refinery with a hydrocracker (lots of them) can supplement their crude feed with all sorts of things. I have witnessed a refinery run 20% tallow through their cracker without any measurable change in product quality at the end and that made economic sense back when crude was cheap (cheap being 40-50$/bbl). I've seen refineries inject palm oil into their feed to, that doesn't even need cracking, just hydrotreating. The economics of that can make sense even at todays prices due to the import tax on crude oil in some countries but lack of import tax on "food items".

    But as you said that's if you bother treating it at all. Bunker fuel has a lot of scope for blending nasties into it, but if you already purchased the material it often makes much more sense to crack it into something more valuable. The economics are such that you nearly always want to minimise the creation of bunker fuel. The world is hungry for diesel and petrol, not so much other products.

  79. Great breakdown by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your post. I love hearing other people critical of the sensationalist news' version of events (and their often misleading headlines).

  80. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not actually grease dumping they're watching out for. This is in Seattle, it could be large amounts of used coffee grounds clogging up the sewers.

  81. Polls? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    Posted by timothy on Tuesday January 12, 2016

    Ah, that explains it.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  82. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by theendlessnow · · Score: 2

    Grease can also be used as an animal feed supplement. My chickens love bacon grease, or used frying oil mixed with their feed. I don't understand why anyone would just dump perfectly good grease. It should be easy to find someone to take it, and possibly even pay for it.

    My guess is that the grease is just a cover story, and the real purpose of the cameras is something else entirely.

    It's PETA looking for people feeding grease to chickens.. or so I've heard.

  83. ATF resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and 0bama is whining about how the ATF doesn't have resources to enforce existing firearms laws. Why the hell are they investigating grease dumpers?

  84. Solution: by sugarmatic · · Score: 1

    Solution: Quadcopter. Camera. Paint ball gun with some sturdy thick, solvent based paint. If the paint won't cover it, the solvents will render them useless.

  85. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My guess is that the grease is just a cover story, and the real purpose of the cameras is something else entirely.

    That's my guess also.

    The emails and things have a discussion about a camera near 23rd ave and Jackson, and one of the people in the emails guesses that it might have been placed on the pole by Walgreen's, to monitor their parking lot. Here is a link to Google Maps, centered right about the power pole in question. Here is a direct link to street view looking right at the camera mounted on the pole. If you look around, you'll notice that there are no drains on the street in that area where someone would pour grease. The closest drains are at the intersection of Jackson and 23rd, and there are poles that would have a much better view of those drains than the pole with the camera (and it's a little conspicuous to pour grease down the drain at an intersection with lights). The Google car drove around that parking lot, and if you wander around there you'll notice that the camera isn't on the pole in those shots. Directly in front of the Magic Dragon Chinese restaurant (next to Papa Murphy's pizza), there's a drain cover that does actually look a little bit stained (weird, I know). But there is a pole that is closer to that drain and restaurant, and still, why the hell would the ATF care about people dumping grease down a street drain?

    If you go back to where the pole with the camera is in street view and look at the parking lot across Jackson, there are a couple women walking through the parking lot wearing hijabs. There's a store/restaurant back there called East African Imports, next to the Navy recruiting office, and it looks like there's also a marker for the Islamic Presentation and Invitation Center, which lists an address at 2301 S Jackson, which is that corner.

    I bet the ATF/FBI is watching the Muslims instead of grease dumpers, but I should probably just get back to work.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  86. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This point can't be overemphasized. I remember when they made it unreasonably inconvenient and costly to dispose of CRTs. Every street corner had at least one old TV or VGA monitor sitting on it, sometimes for weeks.

    Just another unfunded mandate for the citizenry.

  87. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Actually, my bad! I went by a gas station this afternoon and diesel is $2.06 a gallon. So you can make it for $3.00 or buy it for $2.06.

    Such a deal.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  88. Maybe ATF is scared by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    That someone might steal hundreds of pounds of bacon grease, melt it down to get the glycerin from it, then turn it into an explosive, because some terrorist watched an old movie from the WW2 era, and saw an old b&w newsreel that showed the scrap drives for aluminum, rubber, bacon grease and looked on wickipedia or google to find out why there was a demand for bacon grease and then discovered the glycerin could be used as an explosive and that way they could fly under the radar of the ATF buy not having to buy fuel oil & fertilizer. Or I could be wrong LOL. Oh, I'm sure the ATF is ONLY looking for grease dumpers/thieves LOL.

  89. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    A lot of communities have only had local purchasers show up the last few years, and other places people still have to pay to dump. Yes, some restaurants get paid a token amount. No, all restaurants do not have that available. It is not a standard thing. The standard thing was always having to pay to have it dumped, same as other waste.

  90. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    What if it turns out that your chickens eat a smaller amount of grease than restaurants produce? What then?

    It may be that it is very low quality as a food source, and a fire danger to store and process it, and expensive to transport it because of the weight and special equipment needed.

  91. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Ask yourself why the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms is hunting down grease dumping instead of, say, the EPA?

    I don't have to ask myself that, because I already know that the three things that were used for the acronym and the department title are just words, and that the specific things that they have the responsibility to investigate is determined by congress. There is a lot of politics that goes into which agency gets which turf, and sometimes it changes over time.

    If you would prefer the EPA to investigate, that would be some sort of proposal to send to your congressperson. It has no bearing at all on the question of which agency is responsible for this investigation now.

    It may be that illegal dumping results in fires, and is lumped in with explosives because fire danger caused by ignoring rules is the major thing that the ATF is combating in their enforcement, and that explosives are lumped in with firearms because historically fire danger to whole cities was one of the problems relating to the firearm industry that resulted in public demand for regulation.

  92. What's at 23rd and Union? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://uncleikespotshop.com/

    As to why 23rd and Jackson? Nothing jumps out. But drugs plus anything equals federal case.

  93. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by KGIII · · Score: 0

    Yup. It's the BATFE and has been for a while. I might be biased but I think that would make a better big box store than a government body. It's be the ultimate one-stop shop for 4th of July preparations. At least the store, as I'm picturing it, would be the most awesome store ever. I might be nearing 60 but, damn it, that sound like my kind of place.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  94. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by MercTech · · Score: 1

    My question too. ATF investigating grease dumpers? Pull the other one; it has bells on.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  95. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one step further... tnt is really just a bunch of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen (and castle reruns)... so better contain and control all sources of those elements, too.

  96. Big Grease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Homer Simpson discovered, you can try to break into the grease industry. However Big Grease will eventually come and shut you down!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lard_of_the_Dance

  97. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fucking LOVE the low price of oil. FUCK YEAH to low oil prices.

  98. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is that the grease is just a cover story, and the real purpose of the cameras is something else entirely.

    Correct. The purpose is blanket surveillance with no independent oversight of innocent citizens.

  99. Re:Grease can be used as fuel. Why would you dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the ATF/FBI is watching the Muslims instead of grease dumpers, but I should probably just get back to work.

    It may be a case of that all-too-rare animal, the Muslim grease dumper.