Slashdot Mirror


What's In a Tool? a Case For Made In the USA (hackaday.com)

szczys writes: You have the choice of buying a wrench made in the USA and one made in China. Which one should you buy? The question is not a straightforward one. Tools are judged by their ability to do the job repeatedly and without fail. To achieve this, only the best of design and manufacturing will do. But this is a high bar when you factor in price competition which often leads to outsourcing production. Gerrit Coetzee looks at this issue, comparing two instances of the same model of Crescent brand adjustable wrench; one a legacy manufactured in the USA, another outsourced for manufacture in China.

57 of 329 comments (clear)

  1. Crescent won't learn by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They were one of the most significant holdouts over the past decade or so, but they won't learn from their mistake. They could have learned from vise-grip, who could have learned from dremel, who could have learned from Stanley. Sears (Craftsman) could have learned from any or all of them, as could Husky and Kobalt.

    They'll all just go the same way, only to lose the race to the bottom to Harbor Freight.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Crescent won't learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One could easily see this lesson by taking a Craftsman wrench from the 1990s and comparing it with one made today.

      Now, one can just go to Harbor Freight, pick up hand tools which are just as good as the Craftsmans (because they likely come off the same forges and on the same boats), but a lot cheaper. For stuff that is infrequently used, this is fine. Same with HF's power tools. I've seen their stuff with a different color and a name brand... same cheap, Chinese construction... but 2-5 times the price. So, might as well skip the "badge engineering" and go there.

      Of course, if you want stuff that is worth anything, especially powered items, you will be paying more, but it actually will work.

      What is funny is there is room in the tool market. All it would take is for a tool company to make decent tools (not whatever the Chinese factories can make), but something designed in the US, and well made (the 1990s Craftsman tools are a good example.) Then, sell those at mom and pop shops or whatever stores don't mind carrying them. Now, people will have a choice between cheap Chinese junk, rebranded Chinese junk, and overpriced (but well made) US made tools. This is what Craftsman should be, but since Sears surrendered to K-Mart, it will need to be a specialty company.

      Maybe if Park Tool decides to get their head out of their ass, move tool making back to the US, and expand out of the bicycle market, that would be the ideal thing. Their stuff has been quite decent, but it would make them actually stand out if they went back to pre-millenium tool making.

    2. Re:Crescent won't learn by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a tool user, I'll admit to buying from Harbor Freight for the things that are intended to be used up. You can't beat their deals on "rotating tool (compare with Dremel!)" heads which are designed to get used up anyway. But their tools that are supposed to last? The hammers loosen after the first few hits. Your options then are to take them in for the lifetime warranty replacement, or hammer another shim in the top. Their other "lasting" tools aren't that great either. Although they do have the biggest adjustable wrench I've ever seen (at over four feet long), I'm sure if you need something like that regularly, there are better ones online that cost more but are worth it not to break while you're turning whatever giant bolts you're turning.

    3. Re:Crescent won't learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's problematic to do comparisons with older objects. The ones that lasted were the good ones. The ones with manufacturing defects have been replaced long ago.

    4. Re:Crescent won't learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not tools. Good quality tools can be identified by heft and feel. The moving parts run smoothly and have no slop in them. Mating surfaces connect cleanly. The castings are high quality. The metal used is an alloy and working surfaces are heat treated or better.

      And then there's the guarantee. There were some old-line tool makers that carried unconditional, lifetime guarantees, which you don't do if you don't have confidence in your product. I'm talking guarantees that said 'if this tool fails for any reason, we will replace it for free'.

      I've seen some tools from India and China that actually seemed decent. Which stands out because those locations are usually known for price rather than quality.

    5. Re:Crescent won't learn by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some HF tools are fantastic, though they are few. Some are total garbage; surprisingly, they are few. Some require modification before use, which supposedly notably includes their machine tools which have rough edges and the like. No self-respecting machinist would let anything like that out the door, but no self-respecting machinist was involved in their manufacture.

      What actually is great, though, are most of their hand tools. The wrenches, socket wrenches and so on are every bit as good as Craftman ever was, if not better — I am a vintage tool aficionado, so I do actually have basis for comparison. Their torque wrenches are not pleasant to the hand, but they are consistent and durable and practically free compared to the big names, which aren't actually any more precise.

      The stuff that gets used up, like drill bits and grinding stones, are actually better purchased somewhere else, because those actually are crap.

      The only hammers I've bought at HF have been rubber mallet and plastic dead blow, which have been of very high quality for their price. All my other hammers are vintage, acquired at yard sales and the like. I live in rusty crusty old boy country, so there's lots of tools around. I only have to buy stuff online if I need something metric.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Crescent won't learn by jgotts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would agree that the three standard Harbor Freight torque wrenches compare favorably with the 1990's era Craftsman torque wrench that I paid $90 for. I tested the $10 Harbor Freight tool side by side on my vehicle with the Craftsman tool and they are close enough that it would be hard for me to justify paying 10x times the price. I can also leave the $10 Harbor Fright torque wrench in my vehicle and not have to worry about it getting lost, permanently borrowed, or stolen.

      My recommendation is to own one set of quality tools made in the United States. Keep this set where you use tools the most. Also buy a set of cheap backup tools. Keep these tools where you wouldn't commonly use them, but they still might come in handy. For example, at your employer or at your significant other's place.

      And every time you shop at Harbor Freight, make sure to get your free flashlight and use your 20% discount coupon. I always carry around a stack of Harbor Freight coupons.

    7. Re:Crescent won't learn by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 2

      Mock Harbor Freight all you want, but the wrenches at least actually aren't that bad. I have no idea about the sockets and ratchets or power tools though.

      I have a set of Pittsburgh wrenches that goes up to 1 1/2" that saw hard daily use ( for the first 3-4 years in a weld / fab shop environment) that I bought in 2006-2007, and still occasionally use today. They were holding back rusted nuts while the bolts were being impacted out, used as make shift hammers and pry-bars, and just generally abused due to being stupidly cheap and easily replaceable... but actually ended up holding together damn well.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    8. Re:Crescent won't learn by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with HF as long as you know what you're buying: cheap stuff that will cut it for light work. It's like my approach to kitchen equipment: if I think I might want something, I buy the $30 version at Walmart. If it works, great. If I use it twice and it spends ten years in a drawer, I haven't lost much. And if I wear it out, I now have a list of things that I wish it did, so when I buy a decent one, I know what to look for.

    9. Re:Crescent won't learn by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      It's called survival bias, came up recently in that someone was complaining about catering to nut allergy people and said see what happens now there's a lot of people with nut allergies. I said, "Yea, it sure would have been better if they just died off as children." sarcastically.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    10. Re:Crescent won't learn by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      I said, "Yea, it sure would have been better if they just died off as children." sarcastically.

      Citation? Seriously, what was the death rate of children from food allergies before every second person became allergic to something?

    11. Re: Crescent won't learn by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing is that many Chinese tools from a stable brand also have trade in. Husky/Kobalt have a no questions asked trade in at their respective big box stores. I use it frequently as do professionals. I've tried trading in expensive tools from supposedly "good" brands and pay more in shipping than a new cheap tool will cost.

      These days the quality from China is the same as the quality from the US in a lot of cases. There are outliers but they are no longer the norm. And stuff is so cheap these days it makes no sense to buy the expensive crap. I bought an electric staple gun from harbor freight for $15 - 4000 staples later the spring came out of it's chamber - HB replaced it on the spot. But it's better than doing 20000 staples with the $100 gun and then having to bring it in 3 days for a $75 "consumable part" repair.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    12. Re:Crescent won't learn by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      Obligatory Louis C.K.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  2. Judgement by jbmartin6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Tools are judged by their ability to do the job repeatedly and without fail" Not necessarily. I might just need it once, or for very light use. It is often true that you get what you pay for, but this doesn't mean you should pay for more than what you need.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Judgement by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      I enjoyed the little side bar re:"The addition of gimmick features" /. readers will be familiar with this in software too.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:Judgement by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      That's good because a tool from harbor freight is expected to do exactly that last for only one use.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Judgement by slinches · · Score: 5, Funny

      True, except that fraction is likely in the range of 6/2 to 15/3.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    4. Re:Judgement by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rarely is hiring a professional going to be cheaper than a cheap tool if you can do the job yourself.

      Personally, I COMPLETELY understand the point of the article. There are certain tools I use a lot. For those, I avoid crap and try to buy Made in the USA stuff if I can help it (not that everything made here is good or everything made in China is bad - but the signal to noise ratio is definitely better if you buy domestically made stuff).

      On the flip side though - there are other things that I expect to use once or infrequently. As a DIRECT comparison to your example - I needed to fit a recoil pad to an old gunstock a few years back. Cost to have a gunsmith do it: $35. I had full faith in my ability to do the job - I just needed a belt sander (which I've never needed before so I didn't have one). I not only bought a cheap Chinese made one - I bought a USED Chinese one from a pawn shop for $10. Job went perfectly without a hitch. Not only did I save a bit of cash, but I also now have a belt sander sitting in the garage if I happen to need one again. Now if I used one daily , I'd get something a lot better. It'd be worth it as I'm sure this unit wouldn't last too long with constant use. But for just the one time I needed it for? The cheap unit worked fine.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Judgement by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      strange the one he pointed out saying it had no use I thought sounded quite useful. I often have trouble getting to a nut or bolt well with an adjustable wrench because there isn't enough swing room or visibility. It would be nice to look at the wrench and say, Ahh I need a 3/8ths box end or socket to do this much easier.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  3. Informative Article by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unlike others I found this article well written and with a unique perspective. Defining requirements and tolerances is very important but far too often we overlook these steps and rush right into a project - get the PMO involved, assign a PM, purchase some widget we "need" and run setup. Project complete. Of course it doesn't meet the requirements of the user or customer, but we can't worry about that. We have more projects to "complete".

    1. Re:Informative Article by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Agreed - it did something rare: It outlined the difference between a widget built only for the sake of it being built, and that same widget built to be best-of-breed.

      Put some love into the potential product, and as long as you're competent at it, quality is certain to be higher.

      This is why Apple has been raking in megabucks on their laptops and phones for how many years now? Their products hold up under heavy punishment and hardly degrade over time, if at all. A 10-year-old MacBook or 6-year-old iPhone is still expected to work just fine under the last software update it supports. I've 2004-era G5 PowerMac running 10.5... and it still ran perfectly in 2014 when I gave it away. Apple supports these things for an obscenely long time.

      Meanwhile, OEMs are cranking out near-disposable laptops and phones that barely last a year under any kind of heavy usage (e.g. CG rendering or rough environments). Hell, in many (if not most) cases, these items aren't even supported for drivers/updates/hdwe-specific-patches after a year or so, if at all.

      Mind, there are exceptions to the latter (I still have an LG G2 that runs perfectly fine and snappy), but they are few and far between.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Informative Article by swb · · Score: 2

      The last Mac I owned was the first Intel MacBook. It was junk. The trim peeled off, the ethernet port wouldn't connect reliably unless you held the cable just right, the keyboard had keys that behaved funky and then the CD drive stopped working.

      Worse, was taking it into Apple under warranty and finding out it'd be gone a 1-2 weeks to be fixed. Are you kidding me? 2 weeks for that? I *might* give you 24 hours if you really needed it but I would expect that kind of parts swap could be done in 2 hours or less.

    3. Re:Informative Article by Duckman5 · · Score: 2

      You bought an Apple that broke. Welcome to the club, but surely you wouldn't expect your local Acer (or whatever) shop, assuming there is one, to replace a shell, mainboard, keyboard and optical drive with a two hour turnaround.

      No. If that much was wrong with it, I would expect them to put my HDD in a new unit and send that original one back to the manufacturer.

  4. Big corp. execs think they're clever by ickleberry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Swapping out products for an almost identical-looking Chinese copy made to order by some outsourcing factory. They think they'll be able to super-size their profit margins and people will keep buying their stuff. What they don't realise is that any old fool can order generic tools from China for pennies and their hollowed-out "design"-only office-based tool manufacturing company won't serve a purpose any longer.

    1. Re:Big corp. execs think they're clever by siphonophore · · Score: 2

      I imagine those meetings go something like this:

      "We can save $10M by manufacturing in China."
      "Great! Let's do that!"
      "But we have to spend $1M to ensure a smooth transition."
      "No thanks. I want all the savings and none of the spending. Next meeting."

      --
      Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
      -Scott Adams
    2. Re:Big corp. execs think they're clever by FrozenGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some years ago, the president of the company I worked for wrote a book on his management philosophy. In it, he noted that you should always be using your current job to leverage yourself into a better job and that if you were in the same position for more than 2 or 3 years, your career was stagnating. If that's a typical attitude for upper management (and I suspect it is), these folks are not making foolish mistakes. They are maximizing profit to leverage themselves into a better job somewhere else. If, after they move on, their former company craters, it's simply proof of how good they were.

      --
      linquendum tondere
  5. Fallacy by KeensMustard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is bit of a false dilemma fallacy. Firstly, Chinese manufacturers will make tools to spec - if you pay them less, get a lower quality product. Secondly, I don't see why I would go to Bunnings or Gasweld and only have the choice of two brands - there's many brands out there, Sidchrome, Stanley, Kincrome are all very good (and all AFAIK made in Taiwan these days) - just buy the tool at whatever price level makes sense.Not a lot of point shelling out big bucks for a tool you only pick up once a year.

    Nothing against US made stuff but you pay extra because of the cost of shipping it half way around the world, and generally the exchange rate makes importing those goods expensive because the of the high US dollar.

    1. Re:Fallacy by ibpooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chinese manufacturers will make tools to spec - if you pay them less, get a lower quality product.

      I believe really that they will make tools to whatever spec the customer aggressively tracks, monitors and enforces every little detail of; and as soon as there is a hint of flexibility or laxity in the oversight, will slip through lower quality where ever they think they can get away with. This includes things like "crimes of omission", where they will actively seek to work around the spec and poke holes where the inspectors may not be looking or may not have even thought to look. It is taking an approach of delivery of the least possible quality, rather than a good faith effort to meet or exceed the intent of the customer.

    2. Re:Fallacy by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      Nothing against US made stuff but you pay extra because of the cost of shipping it half way around the world, and generally the exchange rate makes importing those goods expensive because the of the high US dollar.

      If you live in Europe, substitute "made in Germany" instead of "made in the USA" for the purpose of this article.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Fallacy by tomhath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      as soon as there is a hint of flexibility or laxity in the oversight, will slip through lower quality where ever they think they can get away with

      That's my understanding. It's an East versus West thing - Eastern mindset is "if you don't catch me cheating I'm a clever businessman"

    4. Re:Fallacy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Some Chinese companies make really high quality tools, as good as the best western ones. They noticed that a lot of western brands were downgrading and realised that they could offer a slightly more expensive but much better quality product.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Fallacy by siphonophore · · Score: 2

      I agree with this to a point (i.e. that still happens but it's getting a little better).

      What really matters is the relationship. My company has an Chinese executive who spends weeks a year renewing relationships and trust. It's expensive and hard to do outsourcing right, but when it's done well it is transparent to the consumer and adds wealth to both countries.

      --
      Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
      -Scott Adams
    6. Re:Fallacy by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      as soon as there is a hint of flexibility or laxity in the oversight, will slip through lower quality where ever they think they can get away with

      That's my understanding. It's an East versus West thing - Eastern mindset is "if you don't catch me cheating I'm a clever businessman"

      I think Wall Street thinks that too.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:Fallacy by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      as soon as there is a hint of flexibility or laxity in the oversight, will slip through lower quality where ever they think they can get away with

      That's my understanding. It's an East versus West thing - Eastern mindset is "if you don't catch me cheating I'm a clever businessman"

      I think Wall Street thinks that too.

      Wall Street thinks, "If you don't catch me cheating I am clever, I make bonus. If you catch me cheating, you are a danger to the society, FBI will take care of you, I make bonus". In fact all scenarios lead to "I make bonus".

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  6. Re:Touchy Feely Bullshit by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

    Well then you must never have worked as an engineer on a product/scientific instrument/piece of software/whatever from start to finish like the author of TFA has. I have, and his observation of how crucial it is to communicate design intent down from the drafting room to the shop floor and forward in time from the conception to the execution is spot-on.

    Any idiot can have a brilliant idea, but the follow-through to make sure it's realized the way it was conceived, and to make sure the conception keeps pace with physical reality...that's a learned skill that takes hands-on experience to master.

    You don't want to use an OS on your computer or on your phone that's made by people who don't use computers or have never had a cell phone, so why should you want the physical fabrication of your phone handled by people who don't have a stake in using the product?

  7. also a case for "Design in China" by dfn5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are lots of Chinese tools that are the best in the world.

    I’ve worked as an engineer in industry. The one common thread between a quality product and a bad product has always been this, ”Is the person who designed the product involved in making the product?”

    This is not an argument for "Made in the USA". This is an argument for the design and manufacture should be in the same place. Therefore, this also makes the case for "Don't just export the manufacturing phase. Also export the designing phase."

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:also a case for "Design in China" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Things need to be designed where the users are. That's why Japanese companies have design officers in the counties they sell into, who are and to localise and customise products extensively.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:also a case for "Design in China" by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's part of it. However, I think the author of the article missed (unless I missed reading it) turning your company over to MBAs who do not understand engineering or manufacturing. Having no product experience, or worse, desiring none, they will make a mess of a product regardless of where it is manufactured.

  8. Re:Capitalism in practice... by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are a great many human values that an economic system could promote. Capitalism got none of them.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  9. Tools are judged ... by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tools are judged by their ability to do the job repeatedly and without fail.

    That's not how anything is judged -- they are judged by expected TCO. And that TCO includes initial cost, minus expected performance but plus the expected value of failures multiplied by the cost of each failure. All of these vary by the job that the tool is being asked to do.

    To give an example, if the wrench is going onto a deep-sea oil platform where replacement will be very costly and will cause very expensive delays, the last factor is very high and so reliability will be at a premium.

    On the other hand, the local auto mechanic probably has a dozen wrenches and a parts truck that comes around every other day that can bring a new one in for nearly zero overhead. So she might be willing to accept a higher failure rate.

    On yet another (third?) hand, someone working in aerospace or other sensitive area will likely need a wrench that can accurately deliver a set amount of torque. In this case, the accuracy of the tool will be the most important concern, since failure of the product (satellite, jet engine, space shuttle booster rocket clamp attachment) will be far more costly than failure of the tool.

    So there you have it, three examples of how making general statements about how we judge things is complete bollocks. The "right tool for the right job" might be cliché but the lesson is less about picking the right tool and more about thinking about the properties that are priorities for the job.

  10. Re:Capitalism in practice... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a great many human values that an economic system could promote. Capitalism got none of them.

    Problem is, in practice, neither does any other system we've tried in human history.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  11. Re:Capitalism in practice... by siphonophore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Education, for one, is sorely lacking. Here's an example of someone living a historically luxurious life without the faintest idea where it all comes from.

    --
    Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
    -Scott Adams
  12. Re:is this even slashdot news? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    And, if you are even a bit of a tinkerer or garage mechanic you also know that harbor freight crap is generally inferior to Snap On or MAC.

    I disagree...last time I tried to use a MAC hammer the screen broke and the Thunderbolt port stopped working, and it didn't even drive the nail in properly.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  13. Re:Wish the analogy transferred by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe if we were to make one in the USA at this point in time it would be about $2,000 instead of $700.

    Toyota and Honda don't charge a price differential for cars made in the US versus those made in Japan. Why would Samsung?

  14. It's more fundamental than that. by taustin · · Score: 2

    I spent a number of years working in the plumbing industry. There were a lot of imports (more Korean in those days than Chinese, but the same principles apply) , and a lot of domestic production, and lots of opportunity to compare.

    And the import stuff was all over the place in quality. The good stuff was every bit as good as the US made stuff. The cheap stuff was crap. The difference was in what the importer (the US company, that is) ordered. The difference in manufacturing is that the Korean factories had a lower level of quality they were willing to produce than their US counterparts, so they had a lower price. The importers, as often as not, had no clue what the difference was between a $1 pipe fitting and a $10 pipe fitting, so they ordered the cheap one. But if you ordered the good stuff, it was top quality. And top price, because it took just as many man hours to make in Korea as it did in the US. The man hours were cheaper, sure, but then you had to pay to ship it here, so it evened out. The top quality was about the same price, no matter where it was made.

    The failure wasn't a disconnect between the designers and the factory, the failure was between US management and the real world.

  15. And socialism in practice: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From a comment at TFA -

    "Another thing that can give an idea of the scale of corruption in China. If you haven’t seen them, I highly recommend you look up the Chinese “ghost cities”, and be amazed. Entire cities – including upscale homes, apartments, malls, business complexes. Built only because government grants covering the cost of construction were available to developers. But they weren’t needed, there’s no one to actually occupy them (or perhaps no one who can afford to do so), and many are now crumbling due to disuse and neglect."

    Because the highest value in socialism is politics and LOOKING like you're doing something... not making sure you make best use of your resources.

    At least with capitalism there's feedback in the system so that when resources do get excessively wasted somebody can actually get in there, make more efficient use of them and... eat your lunch.

  16. adjustable tools for adjustment by slick7 · · Score: 2

    If you are adjusting packing glands on pumps or valves, it's fine. If, on the other hand you need torque, use the proper wrench. I have seen too much damage to bolts and nuts due to " adjustable wrenches ". The proper tool for the proper job. If you are too cheap or too lazy to use the proper tool, you get what you pay for.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  17. Re:Touchy Feely Bullshit by plopez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Voting with your dollar only works if you have a choice. If all companies have headed into the downward "cut costs at an costs" spiral then you have no real choice.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  18. Re:Neither by RDW · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once upon a time you might have written you prefer quality British-made tools, but they must be pretty thin on the ground now. I have an excellent Norbar torque wrench (Norbar apparently dates back to World War 2, when they made tools for the Merlin aero engine). A bit of Googling suggests that the wonderfully named 'King Dick Tools' are still making stuff here. I now have to go out and buy one of their products, partly to support British industry, but mainly so I can brandish a tool with 'King Dick' written on it.

  19. Tools of the trade by petes_PoV · · Score: 2

    Tools are judged by their ability to do the job repeatedly and without fail. To achieve this, only the best of design and manufacturing will do

    Utter rubbish - it sounds like "reassuringly expensive" - an amusing phrase when applied to lager (beer), but trite in the real world. Tools are judged on their ability to get the job done. Most normal people are origin-blind. They don't, nor should, care where a tool, device, object was made or sold from. Just so long as it's fit for purpose and cost-effective.

    As for buy .... <name of country> this is little more than subsidising inefficient or lazy production and fooling yourself that you're a "patriot". Great if you a re a politician - who's main job is to fool the gullible and ill-informed. But for most people it's irrelevant. There are factors that come into play: support, warranty and spares. However, buying from a local producer is no guarantee that you'll get any of those and the internet makes everywhere as accessible as they choose to be, Buying from a known and trusted brand should be sufficient but since so much of the population just looks at the price, even brand recognition counts for little - and supplies the same - in these days of disposability.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  20. Re:Capitalism in practice... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    capitalism is the worst economic options thats for sure

    except for all the others

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  21. Re:The crescent wrench an american tool? by toddestan · · Score: 2

    Since you obviously aren't familiar with brands of tools, and you clearly didn't pick it up from the TFA either, Crescent(tm) is a brand of tools based in the USA, and yes they make Crescent(tm) wrenches, or at least used to, until they outsourced the manufacturing to China. What you have is an adjustable wrench, which the Crescent(tm) wrench is a kind of, much like how a Kleenex is a kind of facial tissue.

  22. Time by jgotts · · Score: 2

    I rarely post two responses to the same Slashdot article, but I've read everybody else's responses and nobody has yet mentioned the value of his or her time.

    When buying the cheapest product, too many people do not factor in the value of their time.

    Let's say that I buy a $10 tool instead of a $50 tool. If the $10 tool breaks, then I will probably waste a minimum of an hour of my time replacing it, not to mention wear and tear on my vehicle. To me an hour of my time is worth more than $40. Saving anything less than $50 on a tool that has the possibility of malfunctioning is a losing proposition.

    Get yourself the best tool, and save yourself the grief of wasting your valuable time.

    Additionally, nobody has mentioned the value of his or her physical or mental health. When a tool malfunctions, it takes a toll on you. Maybe the tool will only injure you slightly, but was it worth it? Stress hormones in your brain shorten your lifespan, so why make it hard on yourself by making your work more stressful due to malfunctioning tools? We are not machines with replaceable parts. We are fragile humans, physically and mentally.

  23. Socialism does just fine by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Informative

    anywhere it's been tried. What you were probably thinking of is the many, many Fascist Dictatorships that happened to use Karl Marx's books for rhetoric (Russia, China, North Korea, etc). Democratic Socialism works just fine, thank you very much.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  24. Re:Capitalism in practice... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

    We sure made a lot of stuff under capitalism. I suppose whether you consider productivity a human virtue is in the eye of the beholder.

  25. Place of manufacture doesn't predict quality by Mr.CRC · · Score: 2

    I recently bought some very expensive Armstrong (made in USA) ignition wrenches, hoping I'd get some very precisely formed tools. They were crap. Now days, Tekton tools are better quality than most consumer-grade tools.

    I go through quite an ordeal to find quality tools for reasonable prices. For screwdrivers, its German made Wiha. For wrenches, sockets, and some other things, Tekton has taken the limelight.

    For a .0005in resolution dial test indicator, I tried a Chinese one. It was crap. So I bought a second B&S BesTest on Ebay and got a good one.

    Electronic pliers: Tronex (the very best there is), Erem, Xuron. Even the German brands have become crap now: CK and Xcelite. Larger wire cutting pliers by Swanstrom are very nice.

    I just opted to not buy another set of cheap needle files, and instead bought a $70 set of Grobet/Teborg ones. Very worth it!

    I tried an economy model Mitutoyo caliper to have a 2nd pair in addition to my good Mitutoyo calipers. It was crap. Now iGaging makes calipers for $40-$60 that are as repeatable and solid as good Mitutoyo. Maybe I won't trust them when .0005-.001 accuracy really matters, but for routine measures, they are great.

  26. Re:is this even slashdot news? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

    And that, kids, is why "knowledge" and "intelligence" are two different words.

    Today's lesson was brought to you by the word disingenuous.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.