Slashdot Mirror


Drone Racing League Wants To Be the Next NASCAR (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Drone Racing League has secured a series of significant investments that it hopes will be enough to turn drone races into a spectator sport. The quadcopter drone racing scene has only exists for a few years, so it's still fairly disjointed. Rules and standards vary between organizers, so it can be hard to have fair races. The DRL aims to fix that. In doing so, it hopes to take lessons from NASCAR and the growing e-sports leagues to find an audience. "Often, pilots wear virtual reality goggles that receive a feed from the camera embedded on the drone and maneuver as if they were in the craft itself. That first-person feed is also recorded and used as raw material for the content produced by the Drone Racing League." The high speeds combined with the ability to make interesting (and photogenic) courses may appeal to people who find car racing too boring.

91 comments

  1. Hillbillies of the US get another sport! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yee-haw!

    1. Re:Hillbillies of the US get another sport! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not gonna take off.

      That newfangled technology stuff can't hold a candle to our hero (insert name of some guy in a space suit with more ad stickers than your average porn page). And if he can't die for our entertainment, where's the fun?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Hillbillies of the US get another sport! by MouseR · · Score: 1

      There's no fun in watching drones do circles.

      And I'm talking about the cars.

  2. Radio-controlled racing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...already exists since the mid-1970s.

    Granted, the largest R/C vehicles are about 1/4 scale.

    Why is reinventing the wheel so popular these days?

    1. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by abies · · Score: 2

      Because it is about flying, not about radio control. Think Star Wars pod race/death star trench/etc kind of flying, rather than boring 'safe circle' racing. Remote control is just a side requirement, because you cannot make these kind of race safe enough to put people inside helicopters racing through narrow canyons, but you can accept 70% 'fatality' rate on drones.

      As for existing R/C vehicles, let me guess, they were trying to recreate real race conditions as much as possible, just in smaller scale, rather then trying to innovate? Because they were more 'I'm too afraid to drive real car race, so let's pretend' camp rather than 'real car races are way too boring and safe, let's use robots so we don't have to worry about accidental deaths'? If anything, I would rather compare it to all the robot-fights leagues which are out there - just taking it into air and focusing more on racing than fighting (we will see how much more).

    2. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by Viol8 · · Score: 2

      "Because it is about flying, not about radio control."

      You ever tried flying a proper R/C helicopter or plane? Its a damn site harder than a computer stabilised drone my friend.

    3. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by abies · · Score: 1

      Yes I did. I have not actually ever tried to fly a drone yet, but that is irrelevant.
      Has anybody tried to do interesting race competition with non-trivial tracks for R/C helicopters or planes?

    4. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because it's "with a computer".

      You just wait 'til someone figures out a way to put "on the internet" on top of that!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      They're not trying to reinvent the wheel, nor have they made any claim about inventing R/C racing. They're trying to create a business modeled after NASCAR so that they race drones as a career rather than just as a hobby.

    6. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      "non-trivial tracks"?

    7. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by abies · · Score: 1

      This is what I hinted at in my original post - that it opens possibility of doing more enclosed tracks, with things like canyons, tunnels, windmills etc, turning it into crossover between minigolf and StarWars1 podrace, rather than 'fly in circle around these sticks 5 times, fastest guy wins'.

    8. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for existing R/C vehicles, let me guess, they were trying to recreate real race conditions as much as possible, just in smaller scale, rather then trying to innovate? Because they were more 'I'm too afraid to drive real car race, so let's pretend' camp rather than 'real car races are way too boring and safe, let's use robots so we don't have to worry about accidental deaths'? If anything, I would rather compare it to all the robot-fights leagues which are out there - just taking it into air and focusing more on racing than fighting (we will see how much more).

      Gosh, no. Before you post nonsense, perhaps doing a little googling would help you? Or just look on Youtube.

      These are real racing leagues, with real championships (yes, including world championships), and you need real skill, otherwise it's just going to be an expensive evening, since real R/C cars used for racing use pretty much the same materials as the full scale ones (carbon and aluminium) and cost from about 300 to at least 1000 bucks.. Try controlling a 50 cm long wheeled missile going 60 Mph on a tight circuit!

    9. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "Professional R/C driver" and you'll get tons of hits. It exists since close to 30 years.

    10. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      So? I didn't say they didn't exist.

      NASCAR accounts for about a billion dollars in profits every year. The people organizing this want to try to replicate that success with drone racing. It's the ever-so-profitable business aspect that they're trying to make happen. Saying that R/C racings exists and some individuals have made money off of it in the past does not change the fact that nobody has made a major spectator sport out of it.

    11. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A damn site is where you're posting.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by bluescrn · · Score: 1

      Well, there's the Red Bull Air Race, with manned planes.

      The real reason quadcopters are so much more popular than planes/helis for FPV racing is not ease of control, it'and that they're so much cheaper+easier to repair after crashes. Planes have fragile wings and control surfaces, Helis have lots of moving parts that need careful setup/tuning to fly well. But quadcopters... if you've got a small quad with a tough 'racing style' frame, most crashes will just break cheap and easily replaceable propellers.

    13. Re:Radio-controlled racing... by bluescrn · · Score: 1

      You can add a stabilisation system to an RC plane or heli these days. Or you can fly a quadcopter with auto-level turned off, which is quite similar to flying a heli.

      The best FPV quadcopter pilots have some serious skills: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    14. Re: Radio-controlled racing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drones in the DRL are not "computer stabilized" the pilot has to stabilize them manually, so the real question is have you ever flown a quadcopter without auto-level? It's much harder then a plane or helicopter, especially at 80mph

  3. Taking cues from NASCAR? by jonwil · · Score: 1

    You mean the sport where the technology used in the cars is basically unchanged in the last 50 years (I believe NASCAR is close to the only professional racing league anywhere in the world that still uses carburetors on their cars...)

    1. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pro Stock dragsters use them. As do most street leagues. And hydroplanes (AKA "powerboats"). And Kart. And Rallycross. Moto. TT. Bracket. Indy.

      NASCAR went from carb to DFI in 2012. Citation

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by CeasedCaring · · Score: 1

      Bill Nye agrees with you.
      http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a19141/bill-nye-the-science-guy-thinks-nascar-should-switch-to-electric-cars/

    3. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Stuarticus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope they make it even more exciting than NASCAR, maybe by offering up the challenge of turning both left and right.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    4. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Nye agrees with you.
      http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a19141/bill-nye-the-science-guy-thinks-nascar-should-switch-to-electric-cars/

      Bill Nye?

      Oh yeah, the guy who plays a scientist on TV.

      Hmm, no science degrees or experience there. Lots of entertainment though...

    5. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What straw man are you trying to throw in here?

      He studied mechanical engineering at Cornell University (where he took an astronomy class taught by Carl Sagan)[10] and graduated with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1977.[11]

      Bachelor of Science looks like a science degree to me.

    6. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Switching NASCAR to electric engines ... the important question is, can they still explode when they crash?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think the rules don't allow something crazy like this.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Taking cues from NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Nye needs to shut his fucking cunt mouth.

    9. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because you're a massive idiot.

    10. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      He's a "science guy". Not a scientist. He popularizes sciences, since that is his job, and he seems to do pretty well.

    11. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that NASCAR is using the "new" ethanol fuel.

    12. Re: Taking cues from NASCAR? by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Actually, a drone that can only turn left (on a course that turns both ways) would be awesome to watch in a race.

    13. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Yes.
      https://youtu.be/fkP-b1ADvbk?t...
      Imagine this times a thousand.

      Also, there's the chance of a stray chunk of metal getting lodged in the connector when swapping a battery pack and the whole thing shorts in a spectacular lightshow. The commentators could use nick names for the accidents like drunken thor, angry zeus, dragon pack, ect...

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    14. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can see that being popular with the crowds.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a few years behind the times: http://www.nascar.com/en_us/sprint-cup-series/nascar-nation/nascar-edu/mobil1-technology-hub/nascar-mobil1-technology-efi.html

    16. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I know PSD and hydroplanes use ethanol (I've been to a hydroplane comp, the smell of spiked ethanol hits you from half a mile away), don't know about the others.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    17. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Open wheel racing has used methanol fuel for a long time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I used to go to the local short track a lot. When the open wheel cars came around you could smell the difference in the fuel they were using, just like you mention.

    18. Re:Taking cues from NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are "Moto", "TT", and "Bracket"?

      If "Moto" is motorcycles, then that's just not right. Most modern series use fuel injected bikes nowadays.

      If "TT" is Isle of Man TT, then same as the previous comment.

  4. Is it ok? by buck-yar · · Score: 1

    Better check with Chuck Schumer to make sure its ok

  5. Drone Air Battles . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Now that might attract an audience . . . two drones trying to knock each other out of the sky.

    Sponsored by DARPA . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  6. Boring... by RobinH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is spoken like someone who's never been to a race. The cars (while mostly old technology) are being pushed to the edge and the drivers are in the car so if something goes wrong, they could, and have, been killed. The engines are powerful enough that the ground shakes. Look, I'm not a huge fan of NASCAR, but even I can see what the draw is, and I just don't see it with drone racing. I'm not saying drone racing won't have an audience, but looking at NASCAR for inspiration doesn't make much sense.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Boring... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      So ... what makes the sport interesting is that people are using cars that wouldn't be allowed on the road anymore due to safety concerns and that they do get killed in them?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Boring... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      And what is it that people like about bull riding and hockey? I don't think it is animals and friendly competition.

      As an engineer, I love racing because of the work needed to balance the suspension and aerodynamics of the car to get the best setup. Of course watching NASCAR on TV isn't the same experience as being in the pits of the local short track, working with a team on their setup.

    3. Re:Boring... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Risk is exciting. It isn't any harder to walk on a high wire if it's higher up, but it seems more dangerous. Trapeze stunts aren't harder to do without a safety net. Performers still do the more dangerous version of these stunts.

    4. Re: Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the chest shaking roar. It's why formula kind of sucks even though it's faster.

    5. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, it's boring as hell. It's just an excuse for the masses to drink too much alcohol.

    6. Re:Boring... by njnnja · · Score: 1

      Do you really not understand or do you just not approve and want to appear superior? On the off chance that you aren't just being a jerk, the fact of the matter is that many human beings like to experience non safe things. Whether it is merely the feeling of being not safe (e.g. roller coaster), or living vicariously through someone else doing something unsafe (e.g. NASCAR, UFC bouts, daredevils), people enjoy the adrenaline rush. Of course, I find it bizarre that I have to explain this to someone whose handle is "Opportunist."

      I don't particularly like NASCAR but I don't think we should s4!7 all over somebody else's preferred form of entertainment. People who live in glass houses...

    7. Re:Boring... by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ok, that explains why people do it. But why the fuck watch someone else do it? I don't understand the appeal of daredevils and the like either. What's interesting about someone jumping over a canyon? Doing it yourself, ok, I can see how this could be some adrenaline rush. But watching? Please.

      Do you want to tell me that it's exciting for some people to watch others on a roller coaster?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Boring... by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Watching somebody do something dangerous creates tension and suspense. Watching somebody a roller coaster doesn't create tension because in general we know they are safe. (When we do it ourselves, it doesn't really matter because our own instinctive fear can override our reasoning.) But watching somebody do something dangerous where we believe a possible outcome is injury or tragedy creates emotional tension.

      I find NASCAR boring as fuck, but if you don't intellectually understand the appeal of daredevils, even if it doesn't appeal to you personally, you're being deliberately obtuse.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    9. Re:Boring... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There are many thing that people find interesting that I cannot really grasp the appeal of. Most of TV for example. Why it's interesting to watch people live their life (or a fake version thereof) is something I really cannot understand in any way.

      But hey, if it makes people happy... I just don't get it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more that autism is pretty common among people who gravitate to online tech discussion. Impaired empathy probably lowers ability to enjoy something like that.

    11. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more that autism is pretty common among people who gravitate to online tech discussion. Impaired empathy probably lowers ability to enjoy something like that.

      Empathy means I don't get a kick out of watching people drive in circles hoping they'll crash so there is some excitement. That's the opposite of empathy.

    12. Re:Boring... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      It's boring for a lot of spectators because going in a circle for eternity isn't very interesting, high speed or not. It gives the illusion that no skill is required because "They're just driving in a circle".

      Too bad they killed off Group B. That was pretty exciting.

  7. You mean the *next* next NASCAR... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    You mean the *next* next NASCAR... I have it on good authority from 2005 that the Rocket Racing League is the *next* NASCAR.

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/s...

  8. Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I suspect the main reason people watch NASCAR (or Formula 1) is because there is an element of danger to it. It's certainly not for the thrill of watching cars driving around in loops for hours. Whether fans care to admit it or not, they want to see cars crash (and people die) and that's what makes the sport interesting. Take the humans out and what's the point?

    So no, drones aren't going to replace these sports. Even if they made it more like Robot Wars it probably wouldn't replace these sports.

  9. Millennials by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They seem to think everything they think up is new and unique and has never been done in the history of humanity before. Drones are just a special type of R/C helicopter with auto stabilisation, but don't tell them that. They think they're an entirely new type of vehicle. Bless.

    1. Re:Millennials by klapek · · Score: 1

      POV cameras make a difference.

    2. Re:Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the vehicle so much as it's the technology that has risen up along side it: small cameras with decent playback and headsets that allow the pilot to get a realtime first person view from the drone as they fly it (and spectators staring at a screen get to see the same visuals). The (relatively) low cost of entry and ubiquity of drones also helps.

    3. Re:Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been adding cameras on RC copters and planes since forever. Just search old youtube videos. Plenty of them.

    4. Re:Millennials by psithurism · · Score: 1

      The cheapness and ease of control of drones, I think, makes it reasonable that they've had their recent explosion in popularity and have generated a much larger following than the old RC flying clubs.

      I've seen big RC helicopters, kinda wanted one, but never got around to spending the time to do the research such a big purchase would require, nor learn how to to hover and deal with the pendulum effect, etc. The ones I was looking at were gas powered and had metal rotor blades though I know they come in some less dangerous varieties.

      On the other hand I recently went down to the toy shop and for $40 bought something I could easily fly around my house and have no problems letting friends children fly around my pets.

      Note that I also have a couple tiny plastic RC helicopters, but I've seen few other people with the patience to build skill at flying them around the house.

    5. Re:Millennials by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      Okay DAD. No, really, what they're doing now with real time telemetry data over miniaturized HD displays is pretty amazing. And affordable. It's a lot like where VR and 3D Printing is today vs the early 90s. It's leaps and bounds better and its finally at the point where it's about to explode to the general public.The technology leaps we are seeing on a month to month basis in the RC world is mind blowing. Since we're all computer nerds, a good analogy is right when the Pentiums came out, this is where we are just hitting with the RC industry and quads. It's freaking AMAZING. If this stuff interests you in the slightest, GET IN NOW to ride this wave. It's one of the best hobbies ever with all this cool tech.

    6. Re:Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These RC copters can be flown by even a child, they take very little space, the arena can be small and the cost of entry is much lower than a decent RC helicopter would have. I only had to see a news report where the stereo view was show from a racing drone to get that increased heart beat you can get from a low flying fighter or aerobatics plane.

    7. Re:Millennials by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      Drones are just a special type of R/C helicopter with auto stabilisation

      Racing quads do NOT have stabilization. You need to push these machines to the absolute limits in order to race, and you need complete control. You do not want the machine fighting your commands.

      Don't confuse a racing quad with some cheap $49 thing. Racers are highly tuned machines that can cost over $1000.

    8. Re:Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet watching people fly R/C helicopters is about as exciting as watching paint dry. Drone racing is actually fun, I've seen videos that were thoroughly entertaining. I don't know if it can work as a spectator sport in the traditional (stadium seating) sense, but certainly on TV it could be right up there with Formula 1 or whatever. F1 has the same "issue" of tracks not entirely visible from any single point so the best way to watch it is a well-directed show switching between first-person footage and exterior shots from interesting parts of the track.

    9. Re:Millennials by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They seem to think everything they think up is new and unique and has never been done in the history of humanity before.

      Yeah better be like the Babyboomers who take one generic concept and then conclude that absolutely nothing has changed in the last 50 years. Seriously I thought you'd all outgrown your teenage "I know everything" days. The current drones are nothing like they hobby remote control devices of yesteryears.

      And ignoring the actual drones themselves, where's our Drone Racing League, which is what the article and the GP's post were about? Sounds like something new to me.

    10. Re:Millennials by bluescrn · · Score: 1

      All quadcopters have stabilisation. Without it, they'd be unflyable.

      Racers don't turn off stabilisation, they turn off auto-level - in 'manual/acro' mode, when you centre the pitch/roll stick, the rate of rotation will be zero, rather than the absolute rotation.

  10. Fun by symes · · Score: 1

    I would so much like to get into drone racing, have VR goggles, 3D camera on the drone... I'd have a lot of fun. But, also, I think I would quite enjoy watching VR feeds of others racing around, or even visiting/flying around interesting places. Seems like we are nearing the time when this kind of stuff could become feasible.

    1. Re:Fun by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I think we have this already. It's called Mario Kart.

  11. Drone Wars - Robot Wars in 3D by maroberts · · Score: 1

    The thinking of just plain old racing is limited. As pilot safety isn't an issue, taking out other drones in the course of the race ought to be thing.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  12. Redbull does/did it better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans in micro aircraft racing through a course marked by obstacles and inflatable towers.. THAT is exciting(check you tube), drones doing even the same thing, meh...

    Both would be more entertaining if they added guns tho.

  13. Language, language... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The quadcopter drone racing scene has only exists for a few years"

    At least the editors are on the same level as the average NASCAR audience...

  14. If the quad crashes, does the pilot die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, really, that's at least half the draw of nearly all racing - if you fuck up, you'll be dead or horribly maimed. There must be an element of danger or it just isn't compelling.

  15. Will work in it's niche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like robot wars, paintball, etc.

  16. Uhm by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    People don't watch NASCAR to see cars go round in a circle a few hundred times. They go to see the crashes. It's the adrenaline from the potential of an accident by having so many cars going together so closely at such high speeds that attracts people. And because the drivers are in the car and in danger the attraction is even greater. There's no way racing drones is going to recreate that when it's just a chunk of plastic on the line.

  17. Next NASCAR title is already claimed by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    The title of "Next NASCAR" was claimed a while ago by the Rocket Racing League with their manned, rocket powered aircraft.

    which doesn't seem to be doing much in the way of racing nowdays.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Next NASCAR title is already claimed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying you are the next big thing isn't the same as BEING the next big thing. It's not something you can really force, despite what pinheaded marketing weenies think.

  18. Going to be hard to find competitors by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Won't be many participants unless this is all done inside. Because if they're flying outdoor courses, the operators have to be actual certified pilots (because this is a commercial activity). If they're doing it for fun, that's different. But the FAA considers the fact that flying the exact same RC aircraft in the exact same way in the exact same place while following the exact same safety procedures to be so much more dangerous if you're paid $5 to do so, that you must stop what you're doing and go learn how to fly a Cessna, first. Then you can go back to flying your 250g plastic quad copter legally, because that general aviation certificate definitely will make that $5 safer to earn (unless you want to fly, say, an ultra-light with an actual human being aboard, then there's no need for certification). But if you don't make any money at it, well, then there's no need to know any of that stuff. Because, FAA.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Going to be hard to find competitors by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You need a licence to do most kinds of auto racing, except for small indoor cart tracks, so it's not that different.

      This could be interesting. Formula E is introducing on-track power-ups like Mario Kart next season, and even F1 has the DRS system. Drones could do all kinds of cool stuff. Remember those trick power-ups that would reverse your controls in the 8 bit era?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  19. Pit stops? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    So pit stops are now what...battery and rotor changes?

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  20. Radio-Controlled Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RC Cars would have been the "Next NASCAR" if it were possible. They've been around for decades, and, at this point, so has the Internet. If it hasn't happened yet for RC cars, it's not gonna happen for drones.

    Unless they get missiles. If they have missiles, this will take off, just like Battle Bots did.

  21. RC Racing is not new by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    And will never be NASCAR.

    There are RC Air races already, Drones are less entertaining than a standard RC air race because the drones fucking fly themselves, it requires you point in the right direction, not actually fly. The electronics do the flying.

    I've been 'racing' RC cars, boats and aircraft for literally 20 years. Drones aren't magically more entertaining thats going to draw people into it.

    No one gets hurt in a drone race (no more than spectators at a NASCAR race, for certain). People expect to see carnage and damage that is painful to someone, even if that pain is purely financial. Completely destroying a racing drone costs less than most NASCAR fans will drink in beer while tailgating (And I know how much they cost, I race them!)

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:RC Racing is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trying to troll here, but drones are the new coolness, and that might actually matter here. I think some kind of RC "air" racing might be cool and I've never heard of any "real" RC Air races before. Using the word "drone" equals more PR and free PR -- things that can actually help a fledgling industry get off the ground, and that can help attract sponsors/investors.

    2. Re:RC Racing is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drone races have been going on all over the world for years now. Many are heavily organized.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwL0t5kPf6E

    3. Re:RC Racing is not new by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      ... because the drones fucking fly themselves, it requires you point in the right direction, not actually fly. The electronics do the flying.

      A racing quad is a very different machine to fly than a $49 cheapie with 6 axis stabilization.

  22. I want to be The next NASCAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO, I have the same chances.

  23. With conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the fastest racing drone on Earth and I can control it with mad skills BUT, I will not register any drone with the FAA or anybody else, so if you all try and put that condition on me, then I will just continue to be the best in my circle of pilots and we will keep racing on our own tracks.

  24. NASCAR = Derby Light by Danathar · · Score: 2

    In order to replicate NASCAR you'd have to replicate the ability to "bump", "rub" and mash into each other without crashing most of the time.

    Rotor blade based drones will probably not cut it.

  25. No you don't by Jfetjunky · · Score: 1

    It might be great at first, but eventually it will become dominated by money, just like every racing sport did. People are trying get like made to revitalize grass-roots racing, but tracks keep shutting down. It gets to the point that the guys with a few times the budget of the rest far outclass the others. As soon as it becomes a profitable business to be the provider of the best performing parts and drones, the garage tinkerers will be left in the dust unless they have the dough.

  26. Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no one has mentioned yet that this is not news. http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/08/12/2221259/drone-racing-league-receives-a-1-million-from-miami-dolphins-owner

  27. Coming soon anyway by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Coming soon to an Amazon delivery drone near you!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  28. simple answer - armed drones by sursurrus · · Score: 1

    Then it's like various NES racing games

  29. Face recognition by NewYork · · Score: 1

    If drones have Facial recognition software they'll become ultimate killing machines;