Slashdot Mirror


Newegg Sues Patent Troll After Troll Dropped Its Own Lawsuit (arstechnica.com)

WheezyJoe writes: Not satisfied that a patent troll dropped its lawsuit against them, Newegg has sued the troll. So-called "patent holding company" Minero Digital sought to exact royalty payments on a wide range of USB hubs, suing, among others, Newegg's subsidiary Rosewill. But the "non-practicing entity" dropped its East Texas lawsuit against Rosewill within days of getting a call from the Newegg's lawyer. However, Minero dismissed its Texas lawsuit "without prejudice", meaning it can refile the case at a time of its choosing. So, Newegg filed its own lawsuit against Minero in Los Angeles federal court, asking a judge to lay down a ruling that Minero's case against Rosewill is baseless. Says Newegg's Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng, "Minero's case does not have merit, and its patent is not only expired but would suck even if it wasn't expired. Now that they have started the litigation, it would be irresponsible for Newegg to not finish it."

174 comments

  1. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love newegg... sue the bastards... unfortunately I don't see newegg getting financial compensation.

    1. Re:LOL by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are not asking for any financial compensation. They are doing it a) because they can and b) because the troll had it dismissed without prejudice, meaning they could file again.

    2. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I read nonsense like this I get a strong urge to go to newegg and buy more cables. I always need more and newegg needs a little compensation for doing good work like this.

    3. Re:LOL by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe, maybe not. I for one will make it a point to shop on Newegg just a little bit more.

    4. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newegg has a history of fighting patent trolls. One of the few companies that don't cave to the troll's demands.

    5. Re:LOL by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also serves as warning for other patent trolls to stay away from Newegg because they will fight back. Even if it costs them money to continue with this lawsuit, it potentially saves them significantly more in the future from all of the lawsuits that they don't have to deal with as a result of any ruling that results from this case or even showing that they have no problem standing up to the bullies of the patent world.

    6. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the troll's demands

      Wishful thinking.

      (That there's only one, if you're fucking dumb)

    7. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the troll's demands

      Wishful thinking.

      (That there's only one, if you're fucking dumb)

      Says the Anonymous Coward lacking in reading comprehension skills.

    8. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if others learned from this Attitude.

    9. Re:LOL by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not directly, but I'm now considering making my next purchase from NewEgg rather than from a local store.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:LOL by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I think he's objecting to the placement of the apostrophe. Thinks that it should be "trolls' " rather than "troll's". I agree, but that's being picky.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:LOL by MrKrillls · · Score: 1

      Same! I'll shop with them to support troll killers, and because they're fantastic. Love 'em. Thank you newegg.

      --
      Don't step on the baby.
    12. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are doing it because a patent suit in the notorious Eastern District of Texas heavily favors plaintiffs filing infringement suites. By filing for a declaratory judgement, NewEgg gets to pick a friendlier venue for the case to be heard.

    13. Re:LOL by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      Well I for one will buy more stuff from Newegg. When most other companies are just looking for the bottom line, NewEgg is actually working to make the world a better place.

    14. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same! I'll shop with them to support troll killers, and because they're fantastic. Love 'em. Thank you newegg.

      I mostly stopped ordering from newegg because they sold me a blu-ray player that was refurbished without a remote, and it was my fault for not reading the fine print. no remote = nearly useless. I think they eventually sent a remote, but it took a lot of effort and aggravation, so basically I saved nothing. It cost me more time and aggravation than it was worth. I think I also bought some cheap drives for something at one point, and they were literally missing covers.

      At any rate, I'm buying more from Amazon these days, but looking at Newegg again. I think both are getting some very low quality stuff on there, particularly from third party sellers. Of course I refused to pay for prime after they raised it, so now I have to order $35+ at a time. So far it doesn't seem a great problem. I figure I'm ordering from Amazon about 16 or so times a year, and a lot of stuff just doesn't matter, so having to pay occasionally for shipping is likely fine. It also reminds me to actually look at other locations for stuff. Last time I bought parts for a PC half came from Newegg and half came from Amazon and likely saved twenty or thirty dollars. It is also worth remembering pricewatch, pricegrabber and pcpartpicker as well as cpu and videocardbenchmark. Of course, whether or not it truly is worth an extra hour or two research to save so little is debatable, but oh well.

      Still, kudos to Newegg for stopping patent trolls I suppose. I'm not sure this proves Newegg has a true don't be evil goal, but it is certainly not a bad thing.

    15. Re: LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pricky - fixed that for ya

    16. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They already know that, that's why they dropped the case. It was only brought in the first place because someone didn't realize who owns Rosewill.

    17. Re:LOL by jbmartin6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought the same thing, aside from other benefits it is great marketing for Newegg among folks who are likely to become valuable repeat customers.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    18. Re: LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have a PayPal account for people who don't even wanna buy stuff from them, but just to straight out send them cash so they can use it for legal purposes.

    19. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You stopped shopping at newegg because you are the dumbass? You said they labeled it, so not false advertising, and they went out of their way to send you one when they had no obligation so since it was your fault for not reading the description. That sounds like good customer service and I would continue shopping at newegg because they did such a big favour.

    20. Re:LOL by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      It also serves as warning for other patent trolls to stay away from Newegg because they will fight back.

      A warning would be a strongly worded letter. NewEgg doesn't give warnings. They go to war. So they filed suit. Gotta love 'em for it.

    21. Re:LOL by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Or.. it may just signal to patent trolls that if you have a case pending in East Texas (where you probably already one just based on location) you must continue with it no matter what. Otherwise they might get you from somewhere that the courts are less corrupt.

    22. Re:LOL by DedTV · · Score: 1

      This kind of thing is the only reason I still buy stuff from Newegg instead of Amazon. So, in a way, they are getting some financial compensation.

    23. Re:LOL by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I don't know Newegg from Adam (Savage? or just any Adam?) and I'm not sure if they ship to this side of the ocean. But I'm going to turn off ad-blocking and go to see what they do.

      (Are they in America? I guess it's likely, because Texas is almost in America.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Idea for anti-troll group by the_povinator · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A group of companies should form a NATO-like pact, binding the companies to employ scorched-earth tactics whenever sued by a patent troll.

    Carthage must be destroyed!

    --
    The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
    1. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And its fields salted. Defeat of patent trolls shouldn't be the object. Utter and complete destruction and the disbarment of their lawyers should be the proper goal. Don't just defeat those evil sociopathic monsters, make sure they're living in a gutter after it's done.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trouble is, the only actual patent troll is the patent office. There wouldn't be any of the people you call "patent trolls" if they didn't have the government on their side to begin with.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by teg · · Score: 3, Informative

      A group of companies should form a NATO-like pact, binding the companies to employ scorched-earth tactics whenever sued by a patent troll.

      Carthage must be destroyed!

      Your suggestion doesn't help much. Avoiding things like this is one of the reasons you put patents into an NPE - they don't have any other business or valuables you can come after. Put one patent in each sub-entity, and you avoid any chance of losing more than the patent - and if you lost, it wasn't that valuable anyway.

    4. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by sjames · · Score: 1

      All the legal wrangling costs money. The more often they lose and then have to pay compensation, the more likely they are to be a net loss. If most of them turn out to be a net loss, they will dry up and blow away.

    5. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      "Utter and complete destruction and the disbarment of their lawyers should be the proper goal."

      Sounds nice. But lawyers sometimes merely represent their clients. What is good for the patent troll would need to be applicable to the driver injured by a faulty seat belt, the coed harmed by a defective hair curler, the parent whose child was suffocated by a badly designed crib. Lawyers facing disbarment for being identified as facilitating spurious or frivolous prosecution might be saying no to all kinds of cases.

      Put the blame squarely where it lies. Punish the plaintiff.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      From what I understand, the courts get pissed about this and have started to break through such 'protections' if it's obvious that the company was set up simply to 'shelter' the parent company from judgements against them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your statement implies a different meaning to "patent troll" than what is generally in use here. This is a troll tactic, but perhaps was not done in pun.

    8. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You do realize that sort of mentality is why 'the south' is like it is today ... right? Because they burned it to the ground on the march through.

      I hate patent trolls more than the next guy, but that would be a dumb idea.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Not so much, the patent office gets paid to grant capricious patents, which are then used to harm legitimate businesses. So they're abusing bad patents for their own profit and screwing over innovators in the process.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    10. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, as someone who has friends who are inventors and hold patents, I think they deserve compensation for the effort they put into their inventions. But the thing is, they're real inventions, not bogus ones. The bogus ones are the problem.

      I was CTO of a small software developer back in the early 00s, and every couple of weeks someone would come into my office with a printout of something they'd read on the Internet, and as soon as the word "patent" came out of their mouth, I'd stop them right there.

      "This is going to be one of those things where they took something people had been doing with LORAN for years and substituted 'GPS' or 'LORAN', isn't it?"

      "Well, LORAN was mentioned in the prior art..."

      "Stop!" I'd say, putting my fingers in my ears. "I am not going to read that thing, I'm not even going to listen to you, because (a) it's a bogus patent and (b) if I knowingly do the obvious thing in that patent we'll be facing treble damages."

      The real problem is bogus patents that dress up the obvious way an experienced practitioner would solve a problem in obscure language. If patents were uniformly genuine inventions then I wouldn't have a problem with non-practicing entities buying them and enforcing them. That wouldn't be a pitfall to just doing your job as an engineer.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that wouldn't be that bad an idea.

      These trolls are basically enemies of innovation and fair licensing.

      Absolute destruction of them and anyone to do with them, financially, should be a goal for any decent large, medium and small company.

    12. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A group of companies should form a NATO-like pact, binding the companies to employ scorched-earth tactics whenever sued by a patent troll.

      Carthage must be destroyed!

      Newegg should literally egg Carthage until he becomes a jumbo serving of French Toast.

    13. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      the patent office gets paid to grant capricious patents

      The only alternative would be to fund it out of general taxation.

      That's a bad thing because there's no metric[1] involved, which means they'd be totally immune to market forces or performance related bonuses and before you know it there'd be unions, socialised healthcare and compulsory gay marriage. And nobody could be fired. Ever. Even if they shit on the coffee machine.

      [1] Like a KPI, not the stupid faggoty measurement system all the wrong countries use.
      --
      roman_mir

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....I think you mean "dismemberment" of their lawyers. It is best not to leave them a way out.

    15. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not so much, the patent office gets paid to grant capricious patents

      As technology has gotten more complex, the patent office's ability to properly evaluate applications has diminished. As such, the patent office has become a registry, leaving it to the courts to decide. Unfortunately, that is a very expensive and inefficient way to evaluate innovation. Although the litigants do pay substantial court fees, it would still cost taxpayers less to allocate more money to the patent office to hire more AND better patent examiners.

      (Partially because corporations will just deduct court (and other litigation) costs, and partially because the cost will be passed along to the consumers. So, no. Shifting the court costs to the litigants won't save taxpayers' money, only change the route the money follows when it leaves the taxpayers' accounts/wallets/whatever.)

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    16. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Sounds good, but could you work some "lamentations of their women" into it somewhere?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    17. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can trace a large part of the problem back to the patent office decision to not require a working copy before granting a patent. And for software, even worse, to not require the source code.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    18. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by HiThere · · Score: 2

      What he was pointing out was the the shell company fronting the suit wouldn't have any resourced to recover damages, or even lawyers fees, from.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As technology has gotten more complex, the patent office's ability to properly evaluate applications has diminished.

      And as patent examiners have gotten stupider. I guarantee there are exactly zero budding Albert Einstein's working for the patent office now. They're so fucking stupid that they grant patents for non-innovative things simply because someone tacked "using a computer" or "with a computer" onto it.

      Seriously. "A method for adding two numbers using a computer." You didn't see any patents for things like "A method for adding two numbers using a calculator" or "A method for adding two numbers using a slide rule" or "A method for adding two numbers using an adding machine" or "A method for adding two numbers using an abacus." Tack using a computer" on there though and suddenly you're good to go because doing any sort of repetitive task than can easily be automated is somehow totally innovative when you implement it on a machine that by definition excels at performing repetitive automated tasks.

    20. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by sjames · · Score: 1

      True, but they will lose the patent and whatever they paid for it plus legal fees. Further, they might stand to lose earlier gains on the same patent as they delay cash transfers to avoid comingling of funds (which could expose the parent company to liability).

    21. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      From what I can tell, most of the patent trolls are just legal firms.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    22. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by mattventura · · Score: 1

      The problem is that sometimes the victims of patent trolls are also patent trolls themselves. See: Microsoft.

    23. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      A group of companies should form a NATO-like pact, binding the companies to employ scorched-earth tactics whenever sued by a patent troll.

      Carthage must be destroyed!

      Now that's a crowd-source idea. I'll throw in $100 a month! Well, as long as I can see the paper trails, literally and figuratively.

      - K

    24. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I had numerous patents and we did license (eventually - we were asked) that tech to others who wanted to compete in the industry. Mostly, we kept 'trade secrets.'

      We never sued or stopped anyone. Hell, when we first licensed the tech - we didn't even charge much (I had no idea what to charge) so we just took what the company that licensed the tech was willing to offer and we got a percentage per use. We didn't get any profit from them using it in-house to develop with or on. We got paid when they got paid. It was never an issue, as far as I know, with anyone using it without license and we never needed to sue anyone or even consider it.

      Then again, it was rather domain specific and fairly unique so it's not like people would have just started randomly using it. Mostly, we kept our software in-house and kept our tech in that. It's not like the software was meant for use outside the company (at that time). We did, eventually, license our software for use by certain companies but that often came with a person (or two) to train them, implement it, and whatnot. It was for those who wished to do on-going, in-house, pedestrian traffic modeling and included monitoring and the ability to gather some metrics. Unless you worked in one of those fields, it's unlikely that you'd have even wanted to use that math (or those methods) with anything.

      As an aside, I'm kind of glad we didn't keep it totally locked down and were willing to license it as well as eventually enabling companies to use it in-house. Doing so enabled us to learn all sorts of interesting ways to implement and use the process. For example, one of the most interesting was a company that had us set it up for them - they wanted to use it to optimize traffic flow (which is mixed traffic) in a warehouse. They also used it in some not-so-ideal methods but that's not up to me to control. You're probably familiar with the company, they now have their own solutions - probably heavily cribbed from what we enabled for them quite some years ago.

      At any rate, it lead to some additional business and actually resulted in us learning a few things and doing new and interesting things at our end. I can't really say that having them, or not, was a huge difference or anything. Even when a company had built something off of our process or (probably) cribbed from it, we never sued. It's unlikely that they were using it to compete with us or anything. After a certain amount of time passed, we did actually enable people who were competing with us in one form or another. As we did vehicular traffic modeling and not everything needed to be on a giant scale, as refined, and compute cycles/storage became less expensive - it became easier for a couple of folks working in a large municipality to do so on their own. There were also smaller companies - often doing projects much too small for us at this point.

      Meh... Bludgeoning them with a patent just didn't seem the thing to do. More importantly, we could help them get things implemented and then make a few dollars from them as they kept going, grew, or even threw back ideas that needed to be implemented. We might have been eating the same meals but we weren't dining at the same dinner tables - if that makes sense. We got a few bucks from them, some ideas from them, and didn't have to go bludgeoning. I don't think it ever occurred to us - nor were we sitting on tech not in use or keeping it locked up.

      So, I don't really have any issues with the patent system at a base level. I just wish it were implemented. If you're not using it, you should lose it - like a trademark. You should have a working implementation before it is granted. Things should be more specific and not just concepts - the idea of a single-button checkout should not have been granted. There should be a better way, end result, for prior art checking and what's reasonable to have concluded by someone in the field. There are other things but those are a few things that I think could be tweaked for better results. Of all of those, I think the worki

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    25. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      s/crowd-sourcing/crowd-funding/

      Whoopsie!

    26. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by KGIII · · Score: 1

      While what you say is true, judges don't necessarily have all that much power - except maybe dissolution and then only, maybe, if someone levies suit. The judge can not, for example, hold someone accountable if they are not legally accountable - as much as they may want to. They can find against them but there's a limit to what a judge can do. They can't just refuse to accept corporate status and hold the real parent-company accountable if they are not, in fact, legally liable.

      And, I guess, that's probably a good thing. There's still a lot that they can do. There's just not a whole lot that that they can do about getting the right people and punishing them, not of their own volition. Judges don't really have that authority and I guess that's for the best - as nice as it would be to see them hammer on the appropriate people.

      Basically, don't expect a whole lot and get your hopes up. I've filed for incorporation, through a lawyer, enough times that I can probably do the paperwork myself. While it does make things more complicated, it does offer a whole bunch of protections that are otherwise difficult to obtain. Having incorporated gives some benefits that can be used to do good things (or bad things). It's actually fairly easy to get incorporated and it isn't even expensive. With a bit of work, you can do it yourself. A LLC is limited in liability for a reason and there are all sorts of good things that can come along with that.

      There are also non-profit, charitable, corporations that are not the same as some other charities. Judge me as you wish but, I'll give you one example...

      I have a corporation that manages a trust. In this trust sits a number of assets. Because I feel the government is not very good at spending money and don't really want to give them a huge percentage of it when I die, I have it configured so that I don't. This corporation exists to manage assets so that they continue to make a profit. Those profits are then given to various groups and there's even an application policy/method that will allow non-profit (or otherwise eligible) groups to apply for support.

      This will continue, so long as the US economy remains viable, in perpetuity, long after I am dead and gone. This organization, and it is not the only one - they're structured for different purposes and diversified to gain some additional protection, exists as its own entity. The assets in there are in there to ensure that they are not counted as my personal assets (they are not my personal assets any longer) for the purposes of taxation. When i die, the government doesn't get that giant chunk of my assets.

      If they got that chunk of assets, they'd use it on a down payment to buy a bomber they neither need nor can truly afford. I might think different if, perhaps, they were going to use the money wisely. Instead, my money will keep doing charitable giving long after I'm dead and gone.

      Yes, I could, if I wanted, employ myself at that group and continue to take assets from it. That's immoral. The assets no longer belong to me and I will not benefit from them, in any way, except that I am not given any additional tax burden because of them at current and they will not be a tax liability when I pass away.

      That is tax avoidance, it is legal, I'd even argue that it's more moral than giving them just enough money to make a down-payment on a loan to buy weaponry they can ill afford and will only be used on those who least deserve it. To use the one in question, the one that I'm specifically thinking about, it puts (at current) three people into a nice private school by providing them a scholarship (and stipend) each year. This will continue to happen, long after I am dead, and nobody is making huge amounts of money from it - though there are financial managers who get to keep a percentage of the profits accrued by their active management. I am not one of those members or managers and I accept no salary with it.

      I've been asked, off-list, what I'll do with the profits from my Tesla score. I bought 20

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Hmm... By the same token, you could say that that sort of mentality is why Germany (or Japan) is like it is today.

      Of course, in both cases, it's much more complex than that. It should be noted that there was even a reconstruction in the South just like there was the post-war reconstruction of Germany or, if you'd rather, Japan. I'd even point out that the destruction of Germany and Japan was as great, or greater, than the levels done to the South - including economic impact and a per-capita loss of life.

      Are you sure you want to argue it that way? It's not that I don't agree with you - it's just that I think there's probably a few better arguments to be made.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    28. Re:Idea for anti-troll group by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I know, you should patent the idea!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    29. Re: Idea for anti-troll group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a liar? I've never met anyone who is financially astute AND talks like you.

  3. Geeks rejoice (using your dollars) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they've handled this so awesomely, I'm now more inclined to buy from them next time I need computer stuff.

    1. Re:Geeks rejoice (using your dollars) by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Their restocking policy still pisses me off, but yeah, they're a better bunch than the vile disgusting subhumans who try to extort money via a flawed IP system.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re: Geeks rejoice (using your dollars) by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      heh, I was going to post the same reply. They charged me about $250 to return an unopened switch (after I paid shipping) for a project where I had bought one too many. Sorry, that's food from the babies' mouths for a small business when Amazon does free returns.

      It's a bet on all the subs coming in on spec. vs. ordering too little or too much. Better to not have to worry about such things, and arbitrary fees means worrying.

      I do admire NewEgg's "never start a fight but always finish one" legal approach though. At least my restocking fees are going to good attorneys.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re: Geeks rejoice (using your dollars) by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Solution: Newegg premier!

      It cut offs the restocking fee, allow for faster/free returns and free shipping. 20 bucks for 3 months, you often save that much in shipping anyway, and it protects you for errors / issues. 50 bucks for a year if you know you'll need to order from the a few times in the year. It's worth it (and would have saved you at least 230$)!

  4. Minero Digital delenda est by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    And sow the rubble with salt.

  5. The TPTA will just give more power to the trolls by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The TPTA will just give more power to the trolls

  6. Don't start none, and there won't be none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's on now bitches

  7. Re:The TPTA will just give more power to the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TaPaTapA, dance along now.

  8. "would suck" is not a legal arguement by davidwr · · Score: 1

    "Minero's case does not have merit, and its patent ... would suck even if it wasn't expired."

    It's true, it's hilarious, but it's not an argument to make in court.

    "it would not be in the public interest even if it wasn't expired" is marginally better.

    "it would be invalid even if it wasn't expired, for the following reasons..." is much better, as long as the reasons it is invalid are legally sound.

    But yeah, "it sucks" does have a nice ring to it. Just not in a courtroom.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:"would suck" is not a legal arguement by Whatanut · · Score: 1

      I'd agree if he were making a point in a case of law. He's not in this context. This is a quote for the masses. "it sucks" seems appropriate for a random news bite.

      --

      yvan eht nioj
    2. Re:"would suck" is not a legal arguement by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Re:"would suck" is not a legal arguement well it should be!

      They need to step cautiously, but quickly, striking with an iron fist - these are the kind of scum that might even have a patent on "patents that suck"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:"would suck" is not a legal arguement by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA (because /.) but I don't see where it says that quote is from their legal filing; maybe it was just a quote while talking with news outlets?

      --
      -SaNo
  9. Term to look up - Barratry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This behavior is flat out illegal.

    1. Re:Term to look up - Barratry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This behavior by the Patent Troll, right?

    2. Re:Term to look up - Barratry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, it's Dicedot's resident armchair legal counsel, a graduate of The Wikipedia School of Law

    3. Re:Term to look up - Barratry by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      You're just mad because he didn't say "I ANAL" to which you could have replied "ORLY?!"

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    4. Re:Term to look up - Barratry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *troll*
      I always thought I ANAL had something to do with Van Morrison's Brown Eyed Girl.
      */troll*

    5. Re:Term to look up - Barratry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hate when a crew in my merchant fleet decides to illegally scuttle one of my ships or otherwise damage it or its cargo!

  10. I think it's a good choice of word by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    I mean, if even Spock can use it, I guess it's good.

  11. The patent by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Informative

    https://www.google.com/patents...

    I'm kind of curious to see someone explain how this invention is different from all the other daisy-chain serial bus connections that were in use in 1995 when this was filed.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:The patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm more curious to see someone explain how USB's tree-structured topology could be construed as a daisy-chain.

      Daisy chains require:
      - all devices must provide a pass-through for the next item on the bus (with the exception of attenuation terminators, which aren't an addressable device on the bus, but merely an electrical necessity)
      - there can be no multiple-output devices or branches in the topology

      If it has branching or input-only devices, it's not a daisy-chain topology. USB has both, and is therefore not a daisy-chain topology.

      I could shit-can their entire patent lawsuit in less than 5 minutes with nothing more advanced than a whiteboard and marker. And that's without saying even one word about the legality of the patent itself.

    2. Re:The patent by suutar · · Score: 2

      Not certain it's relevant. The claims never use the term daisy chain, and that's where the legal force is.

    3. Re:The patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's why they're only suing people selling USB hubs, because they pass along the communication through them to other devices.

      The other person pointed out the patent claims don't specifically mention a daisy-chain topography so the default assumption by the patent troll is that it covers every possible topography ever.

    4. Re:The patent by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      The Commodore VIC-20 had a daisy-chained serial bus in 1980.

    5. Re:The patent by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      There's still a possibility that a daisy chain master device is one of slaves on a daisy chain, creating a branch.

      You can do this on the 1-wire bus for example.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:The patent by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      Branchable?

      That's the gist of the patent - a branchable serial bus.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  12. Had to revise from "totally sucks donkey balls" by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    "would suck" was the edit to make it sound better. And, relatively speaking, it's an improvement from a legal standpoint, imho.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. Always used to use Newegg by The-Ixian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There simply was no comparison, Newegg was the best. For many, many years, Newegg was my one-stop computer shop. They ALWAYS had the best prices. Even better prices, in some cases, than buying direct from a channel partner like TechData or Ingram.

    These days I almost always find better prices on Amazon for the same stuff. Couple that with Prime membership and zero hassle returns... I just can't justify buying from Newegg anymore.

    Am I a bad human being?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Always used to use Newegg by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the exact same boat.

      I'll still check out the Shell Shockers, but most of those really aren't deals either compared to Amazon.

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    2. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Newegg goes out of business and Amazon fucks you, that's why.

    3. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First off, yes, Amazon is not a responsible place from which to purchase.

      Also, whenever I'm looking for components or whatnot I find that Newegg is comparable or better price that Amazon, and usually the standard shipping gets to me in about two days anyway.

    4. Re:Always used to use Newegg by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      I agree except that worry about Amazon getting too big and taking out too much of the competition. Then we'll be like, "Amazon used to be so great, but now I have no other choice." I may be a little dramatic but companies like Newegg are worth keeping around.

    5. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me the one saving grace is no tax to where I live

    6. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They ALWAYS had the best prices.

      I've been driving my dump truck through a series of tubes since the early 90s and I've never seen this to be the case.

      What NewEgg did have, however, was massive inventory. Sure, my local mom and pop, run by technically unknowledgable gamer types, easily matched or slaughtered NewEgg on price - but brick and mortars have this problem of shelf space.

      Amazon, technically, is beating NewEgg at its own game. Still end up shopping on NewEgg, because finding things on Amazon is an exercise in idiocy. Search for item. Find it's in fifteen different categories for no reason. Oh, you want to sort shit? Gotta select one category. Then find out it was cheaper in a different category.

    7. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Am I a bad human being?"

      A bit, yeah. How much better _are_ the prices? 10% 20%? Remember to factor in the recurring cost of the Prime membership. Now remember to factor in the fact that Newegg has _never_ and _stridently_ asserts that they _will_ _never_ settle with a patent troll, whereas Amazon has settled with trolls (which fuels their assaults on other businesses) on multiple occasions.

      Newegg kills trolls dead. Supporting that effort is _totally_ worth forking over a little more cash. And with regards to returns, I've _always_ had zero-hassle returns with items sold by Newegg.

    8. Re:Always used to use Newegg by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Good points, I hadn't really thought about it like that before. I appreciate your reply.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    9. Re:Always used to use Newegg by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      When I was working as a consultant for a small HP VAR, we would sometimes buy from Newegg even though we had access to the channel partners because their prices were significantly better.

      But I take your point about Amazon search. That is one thing about selling everything... your search, no matter how good, has to wade through a lot more categories of items.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    10. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a bad human being, but you have different tastes and priorities than I do.

      I won't touch Amazon with a 10-foot pole. I've purchased from them twice, and neither time was a bad experience. But there are just a pile of tiny reasons why I won't shop there.

      1) Amazon's site is a complete clusterfuck. It's impossible to find things that I want with any speed or precision. I simply don't care enough to shop there. Nothing they sell is worth the hassle. Nothing.
      2) They don't make it obvious which seller you're buying from. When I go to Amazon, I want to buy from Amazon, not some sketchy outfit that sells via Amazon's site. (NewEgg is slowly falling into the same morass, but at least makes it abundantly obvious who you're actually buying from.)
      3) Amazon just loves to substitute "like new" items in place of actually new items, but with a not-enough-to-make-it-worth-my-while price reduction and incomplete description so I can't immediately tell it's not new. (And my OCD kicks in hard on new vs. used, so I hate this practice.) NewEgg at least puts "Open Box" or "Refurbished" in front of the item description and then makes it a completely separate item.
      4) Fuck Prime. No, I will not pay for a subscription to get discounts. I already get that shit from Costco, and they at least have the decency to give me a percentage back at the end of the year.

      Returns aren't a big deal to me. I've only ever returned one thing to NewEgg, and that was a Radeon 9600XT that I thought was DOA (it wasn't, I just needed a bigger PSU). They swapped it for a new one, no questions asked.

      I'm quite sad to see NewEgg copying some of Amazon's terrible flaws these days. But at least, underneath it all, NewEgg still works the way NewEgg always worked as long as you hit that "Seller: NewEgg" radio button. I'll gladly pay a buck or two extra to avoid Amazon.

    11. Re:Always used to use Newegg by nwf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've found that searching for components on NewEgg is much easier. It's almost impossible to search for anything on Amazon that's not totally mainstream. I just put together a PC for a media server, and I purchased everything from NewEgg. They were either cheaper or I could actually find the products quickly. I don't really want to read page "1 of 234" containing random products with no relation to what I searched for. Thanks amazon.

      I hate all their "marketplace" sellers (although NewEgg is doing this crap, too.) Amazon is becoming crap of late. Reviews are useless in many cases, partly because they group tons of similar products into a single "product" (especially bad with movies.) I was searching last night for LotR on Blu-Ray and their descriptions don't even say what's on the extra discs. Useless. And marketplace sellers sell cheap knockoffs that mess up reviews of genuine products. I've ordered a product based the description only to get something else. The seller then says "oh some other seller changed the description." What's the point of having descriptions, then, if any idiot can change them?

      NewEgg is still pretty decent to deal with and getting someone to help you is MUCH easier than with Amazon. Everyone I've done a chat with at amazon was totally clueless. One even re-ordered my order for no apparent reason, which I then had to return. Amazon is becoming the Mos Eisley of shopping anymore: a wretched hive of scum and villainy. Good luck trying to find decent coin batteries, Lion batteries, chargers, etc. They sell them, you'll just never find them.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    12. Re: Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to newegg a lot, then I bought a server motherboard that arrived without the protective cover over the damaged cpu socket and they would not take it back. They claimed I dammaged it when I opened the box. I buy from Amazon now.

    13. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when pricewatch.com was actually useful?

    14. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many online merchants underestimate the powerful draw of hassle-free returns. Amazon send UPS to pick up returns right from my porch. I don't even have to print a label. This has me tremendously spoiled. I am reluctant to buy somewhere else just for this reason alone.

    15. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're being rational with your money, but Newegg does deserve some sort of props for actively fighting the trolls, because in a lot of cases their wins translate to helping others as well when the patent in question is obliterated. Maybe you can find it in your heart to spend an extra $10-$20 a year buying some of your stuff at Newegg as a thanks?

    16. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still is. I just built myself a liquid-cooled FX-9370, 850W Bronze PSU, 16GB DDR-1866 RAM, and an 8GB R9 390 for $700.

      Find me comparable on Amazon?

    17. Re:Always used to use Newegg by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      1) It's impossible to guess what the things you want are, so I can't say what you can or can't find with ease.
      2) They make it VERY obvious who you're buying from.
      3) No, they don't.
      4) "I will not pay for a subscription to get discounts." "I get that shit from Costco." -- WAT?

    18. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just seems to turn up so many junk results. Well i put those 4 parts into amazon and got $714. Do you need 850w for all that? Havent built a PC in forever

    19. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      I agree....

      You have to spread your business around so that you have multiple vendors from which to chose. Because one day, that big vendor that gave you the good price will screw you and everyone else.

      Just like Wal*Mart taught these town folks a lesson. This town let their local mom and pop grocery store go out of business in favor of shopping at Wal*Mart express. Now Wal*Mart is closing and leaving town leaving them with no food, or a food desert as it is called in the article.

      http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireS...

      Spread your shopping around, keep everyone in business or else one day your options may be limited to zero or one.

    20. Re:Always used to use Newegg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence: once you Newegg, now you know :)

  14. And the world said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newegg is coming

  15. Rosewill is part of Newegg? by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cool. I bought some rosewill drive enclosures a few years ago that are still working great. Although I didn't know they were a store brand at the time.

    I don't buy much of anything on new-egg anymore. The site layout is just so messed up now I can't find anything anymore. It was better before they started letting people post classified ads as products for sell.

    If it shows up in the list of results I expect to be able to buy it on Newegg not click through to Bullshitbrandxcompany to complete my purchase there.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Rosewill is part of Newegg? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      It was better before they started letting people post classified ads as products for sell.

      If it shows up in the list of results I expect to be able to buy it on Newegg not click through to Bullshitbrandxcompany to complete my purchase there.

      This! I've shopped NewEgg for over a decade (bought this for $90 in 2002, heh), but killing the usefulness of ShopRunner and then letting some really, really crappy sellers sell through their site has turned me off. I still look when I shop, but as often as not, I buy at Amazon. If NewEgg would allow me to have an account-level setting that made me never see the other sellers, I'd be a lot more loyal (the ShopRunner ship sailed, c'est la vie).

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    2. Re:Rosewill is part of Newegg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their filtering system has just been gamed so you can no longer optimal-bargain-hunt without a real headache. Most of the specs that the filters work on are on 1/3 of the products at best, so for any given loadout you are seeking you will actually harm your chances of finding it if you naively use the search criteria.

      Best to look only at very broad, general categories and sort by price, then spot the items with a ton of high reviews.

      Honestly I'm not surprised they did this, it used to be far too easy to ignore 99% of the crap hardware on the market and I always wondered what kept tech companies in business. Now I understand how finely developed their advertising strategies are.

    3. Re:Rosewill is part of Newegg? by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 2

      On all searches there is a choice for "New Egg Only".

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    4. Re:Rosewill is part of Newegg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really trying to pick a fight but none of your comment makes sense to me and my personal experience with NewEgg so I'm curious if I've just been that lucky or if you've just been that unlucky.

      Their site layout hasn't really changed in over a decade. Amazon has the issue with crappy sellers, NewEgg IS the seller. I sourced hardware at NewEgg for my work on a regular (weekly) basis and have built every computer I've ever owned through it. I've never been taken somewhere outside of NewEgg by clicking on items; its always been direct deal with NewEgg. Maybe you mean crappy manufacturers? In which case, same issue with Amazon?

      Also confused by the ShopRunner comment. ShopRunner is a third party service, and NewEgg just happens to be one of the people that they (ShopRunner) partnered with.

    5. Re:Rosewill is part of Newegg? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Hmm... So you've owned a computer for no longer than 15 years. That doesn't discount your views, by default, but it does mean you're still wet behind the ears and some folks will value your views in light of that. That said, I like NewEgg and shop there frequently. I've bought a lot of computers, to be made or pre-assembled, from them and have had great interactions with them.

      I could, I guess, save a couple of dollars from shopping around but I'm happy going through NewEgg. I've had good service and support and will continue to shop with them just because I tend to stay where I am - if I'm happy. I'm happy there and that means I'll keep shopping there. It's not exclusive, nor is it not subject to change, but my tech shopping is done there the vast majority of time and I would need a good reason to change that behavior.

      I understand that they treat their employees well and pay them well but I have a sample size that totals one for that. At the same time, I've not noticed any great commotion to do with their treatment of their employees. So, there's that.

      I'm glad that they have a policy of standing up to patent trolls - I'm not really sure how much of an effect that really has. I mean, how often are they attacked by trolls? It just doesn't seem like they are producing a whole lot (I think they have one brand that they own - that I know of) so I'm not sure how much chance they'll get to act on that. It's nice that they do and is a good benefit to my already shopping there.

      Hmm... I've used the site since the early days. I don't remember how I found it but I think (and I'm not positive) they kept showing up on a price comparison site that I used back then. No, I have no idea how long ago that was but they were a small outfit. I've only purchased hardware for myself and others on the site - not for business. When I still owned my company, I went directly through Sun or (often) through a company called CDW. They've been in business for a long time, I highly recommend them for business account usage. I've no affiliation (to the best of my knowledge) but my company was a very happy customer for a very long time.

      That said, I used my first programmable computer in 1969 or so. I don't think I owned my own until the 1980s (A TRS-80 was the first one, as I recall, but it might have been a VIC-20 that I owned first - my memory is fuzzy.) I've put together loads of my own computers but I prefer them at least partially assembled now. That's where NewEgg comes in. They've got a decent selection, fine prices, and good service and support. In all these years, I can make not one complaint.

      There... I figure I'll add a few years to your experience. They've only been around since 2001 and you can't be a very experienced user if you've only ever used computers that you've put together on their site. I have lots of experience and lots of history with a whole bunch of sites - and I still make use of NewEgg with an alarming frequency.

      It should be noted, I'd have no problems using them for business purchases. However, I sold in 2007 and was still using CDW (more often than not) at the time. I'm not sure how well NewEgg would have handled a desktop refresh of a couple hundred PCs at the time. I'm not sure how well equipped they were to deal with forklift upgrades at the time. I'd not be surprised, at all, to find out that they're quite adequate at it today. I'm not sure that I'd have trusted them (longevity matters sometimes) at the time.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  16. It would appear by DaMattster · · Score: 2

    Minero Digital awoke a sleeping giant. Once that is done, it's wrath is felt. I like how Lee Cheng said, "... Now that they have started the litigation, it would be irresponsible for Newegg to not finish it."

    1. Re:It would appear by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      who knew it was Newegg? They sued a probably unknown (to them) company only to find out they were really Newegg.

      Their internal policy is probably "don't sue Newegg" and what a surprise when the phone rang and the caller ID displayed "Newegg legal department"

    2. Re:It would appear by suutar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      failure to sufficiently research your target is a major failure in any attack.

    3. Re:It would appear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot use awoke like that. Newegg awoke. You cannot awoke someone.

    4. Re:It would appear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot use awoke like that. Newegg awoke. You cannot awoke someone.

      Don't you try to tell me who I can or cannot awoke.

    5. Re:It would appear by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      "Minero Digital awoke a sleeping giant" is completely correct.

      If you're implying that the verb "awake" can't be used transitively, you're wrong. But don't take my word for it--check the dictionary for yourself.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  17. compensation by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Newegg should INSIST on getting compensated for all of this. In fact, I think that they can ask for 10x the compensation. No?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:compensation by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      How about asking for $150 HR + court costs.

    2. Re:compensation by budgenator · · Score: 1

      How about asking for $150 HR + court costs.

      You forgot a zero, maybe two, $150.00/hr might have worked in 1953.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:compensation by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      and who exactly is going to compensate them? they are a patent troll company, they would almost certainly be a shell company with zero assets and the directors with no direct liability. I am all for punishing the pricks that do this, but it aint happening under current laws.

    4. Re:compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you can prove the corporation was nothing but a shell company and pierce the corporate veil, holding the owners directly liable.

    5. Re:compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shell companies are not illegal. proving it is just a shell does not nothing but prove to yourself that you won't get squat from them.

  18. Furthermore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once the lawyers have been disbarred, all parties involved should then be brought on criminal charges of extortion:

    The obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.

    1. Re:Furthermore by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once the lawyers have been disbarred, all parties involved should then be brought on criminal charges of extortion:

      The obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.

      You're obviously not a lawyer. That's both a criticism of your suggested legal tactics and an endorsement of you as a human being.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  19. This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fakes by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >These days I almost always find better prices on Amazon for the same stuff.

    Amazon has probably the largest proportion of counterfeit products of any retailer, due to the way their business works. Some of them are very good counterfeits; the fake Otter Box from Amazon I looked at the other day had a perfect look-alike box, with the hologram sticker, very hard to tell the difference between the fake and the real thing except the fake was a bit lower quality. The rubberized button covers weren't really rubberized, so it was very hard to press the button, etc.

    On the other wide, Newegg has been a leader in fighting patent trolls for years. Is it worth an extra dollar or two to be confident of getting legitimate products, while supporting a company that's fighting patent trolls?

  20. Newegg is the abuser? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "... Newegg house brand Rosewill..."

    In my experience, Rosewill products are of often poor. It is interesting to learn that Newegg management is responsible.

    1. Re:Newegg is the abuser? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Rosewill was poor when it first came out. It has improved quite a bit for a cheap storebrand.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Newegg is the abuser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh...I've had exactly the opposite experience. I've got 4 enclosures at home that work beautifully - most of them dual-disk. They've been cranking smoothly for at least 3+ years

  21. Re:The TPTA will just give more power to the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was your age..I would have KILLED for TaPaTapA!!!

  22. Expired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That patent expired last year.

    Obviously Minero Digital strategy was threatening small businesses only, while avoiding any larger company with enough money to defend themselves, since Minero Digital certainly knows their case wouldn't stand on trial.

  23. Re:This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it worth an extra dollar or two to be confident of getting legitimate products, while supporting a company that's fighting patent trolls?

    No. This is America. The Lowest Price Everyday[TM] is the only criteria we use.

  24. "....irresponsible for Newegg to not finish it..." by Jahoda · · Score: 0

    he said, visibly erect.

  25. Finally, a lawyer I can understand! by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... its patent is not only expired but would suck even if it wasn't expired....

    1. Re:Finally, a lawyer I can understand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems dangerously close to actual functionality, and it's not even the patented thing but the patent itself.

    2. Re:Finally, a lawyer I can understand! by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I was focused on the same thing and was going to write a post based on the same quote.

      It's funny, you normally expect lawyers who are speaking publicly to use legalese jargon....

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:Finally, a lawyer I can understand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose a patent on the basic structure and functionality of a patent so badly written and irrelevantly used in courts of law that real work (in the physics sense) occurs in inevitable reaction to its existence.

      Then I will attempt to patent the use of the above patent as a power generation scheme.

    4. Re:Finally, a lawyer I can understand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New headline "Tech company lawyer endears himself to thousands of geeks with a single statement."

  26. Support them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So lets make sure we support NewEgg since they seem to be doing the right thing.

  27. skrew them B1tches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope newegg skrews them in the ground good

  28. PC Part Picker helps. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    I recommend PC Part Picker.

  29. Price Watch by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Price Watch seems good also.

  30. Re: This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fak by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Well if quality isn't a factor in what you buy, then quality need not be a factor in the legal system.

    I can understand wanting to save money, but you also need to understand the consequences of doing my so. Mind you, paying more doesn't always mean better quality, so buyer beware.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  31. like attacking smoke by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

    If it is anything like a normal patent troll then this lawsuit is pointless, it will be a shell company that will just trade the patents to a new shell and evaporate leaving newegg with extra legal bills for no purpose. The whole business model of a patent troll is to have no real assets or employees to risk, just lawyers in a shell company.

    1. Re:like attacking smoke by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      It's not pointless - Newegg isn't suing for money, they're asking the court to find the patent invalid in order to prevent any potential action in the future.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:like attacking smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all it takes to attack smoke is a paper fan. easy peasy.

    3. Re:like attacking smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what happens should the shell company dissolve before a ruling or even trial can commence? you can't have a ruling against a non existent entity.

    4. Re:like attacking smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should sue for money, otherwise, what's to deter them from repeating this on someone else?

    5. Re:like attacking smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lose the court case by summary judgement, same as anyone else who doesn't bother to show up.

    6. Re:like attacking smoke by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And this would keep the court from ruling on *the validity of the patent* exactly how?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    7. Re:like attacking smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't.

      A previous commenter's assertion that Minero might move the asset(s) to a shell company is an action that is easily prevented with appropriate wording in the resulting Order. The failure of some of my colleagues to insert such wording has led to no end of trouble with these so-called "patent trolls." Fortunately, some of us tend to do our homework before entering Orders -- and more should.

      N.B. Attorneys acting as "placeholders" for shell companies are placing themselves in grave danger. See the MRPC.

  32. mass mailings, meet justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone sent their boilerplate "pay up or we'll sue" extort... I mean "patent lawsuit" letter to the wrong company. Hopefully Newegg will be able to get a ruling that will set a precedent and dissuade these parasites from similar actions.

  33. Re:This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fake by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

    That is funny, as the only time I have ever gotten a fake was from Newegg marketplace. The few times I needed help from Amazon? I got what I paid for or the cash put back in my account almost the same day, when I got a fake from Newegg? Despite a dozen emails they wouldn't do shit, I ended up getting nothing but a pile of garbage for my money.

    Ironically I was about to pull the trigger on nearly 2K worth of parts on some new builds but after fucking me over for $40? Amazon got that cash along with every purchase from the shop ever since. Say what you will about Amazon but when things go wrong? I always get my money or my parts, with Newegg I found out there support is pretty much file it in the can and call it a day.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  34. I'm pretty sure tha tjust following orders by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    was made an obsolete defense during the Nuremberg trials. There is nothing requiring lawyers to take on these clients.

    1. Re:I'm pretty sure tha tjust following orders by eam · · Score: 1

      Did I misunderstand you, or are you using the Nuremberg trials as an example to suggest that patent trolls are too evil to deserve legal representation?

    2. Re:I'm pretty sure tha tjust following orders by Lotharus · · Score: 1

      Do you disagree?

  35. Re:This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fake by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    If I want a certain model/version/edition I tend to go with ebay as it's more WYSIWYG than amazon. Amazon has a really high tendency to use stock photos.

    Plus some of the listings have been screwed up for years! Check these two out http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ... Buy nickel get brass

    http://www.amazon.com/Gardner-... Buy brass get nickel

    They have been like that since at least as far back as march 2014!

    But the 2 day shipping and no rush credits are still great!

    I haven't gotten anything from amazon or ebay that was counterfeit that wasn't advertised as such that I'm aware of anyway. You know good MFI spec lightning type cables go for about $1.60 each Apple still wants $19 for one. Let's see do I want 10 cables that will last about 3 months a piece or do I want to buy one cable that will last about 3 months? Same price, same country of origin and same crap quality.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  36. Newegg does not fuck around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newegg does not fuck around. I love these guys and that they play hardball. I wish more companies, and particularly bigger companies like Amazon, would stand up to these patent trolls. They have the resources to do so and it would also be in their financial best interest to do so.

  37. Good Egg, bad Egg by marcle · · Score: 1

    I'm glad for their policy against patent trolls, but I buy from them as little as possible.

    Reason? Not prices, not selection, but return policy. Even if you receive a defective item, you have to pay return shipping.

    Newegg's excuse? "It's not our fault if the product's defective." Honest, look it up on their site, that's their published excuse.

    Well, if I get a defective product from Newegg, it's not my fault either. They can go suck Eggs.

    1. Re:Good Egg, bad Egg by sconeu · · Score: 1

      "It's not our fault if the product's defective."

      Really? Damn, things have changed.

      We ordered a rackmount LCD console from them back in '04 (about $1000 or so). The vendor shipped the wrong gender cable with it. Called NewEgg. They didn't give me the "It's not our fault" line. Instead, they shipped the correct cable at their expense. Arrived two days later.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  38. Yeah MARKETPLACE is any random seller by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the Newegg Marketplace means you're not buying from Newgg, but from some random person who signed up to sell on their site - much like Amazon or eBay.

    1. Re:Yeah MARKETPLACE is any random seller by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Except with Amazon market its backed by Amazon and will fix the problem, with Newegg? It might as well be eBay. Between their shit customer service and the way they throw Newegg market results with their own? I'm sorry but they are no longer a trustworthy company IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  39. "Rosewill" is just a name. The Mfr. name is hidden by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    It's important to recognize that, according to the ArsTechnica article, "Rosewill" is just a name Newegg uses to hide the name of the actual manufacturer.

    I've had some good products from Newegg's "Rosewill" also. Most Rosewill-branded products that I've seen have had some design or manufacturing defects, often amazingly foolish defects.

    Read the complaints on Newegg. Newegg should get more knowledgeable people to evaluate the products sold under the Rosewill name. At present "Rosewill" is damaging Newegg's reputation.

  40. Didn't realise who they were suing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they saw Rosewill (I don't know them) and thought: "hey, easy target - easy money". Then the letter came on NewEgg letterhead and they went like "oh fuck, get out of this NOW", but the burdock already hooked onto them.

  41. Re:This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fake by houghi · · Score: 1

    What people take away from what you wrote is that Amazon is cheaper.

    If you want to do the morally right thing, you should go to a localy owned store and buy it there, supporting the local community.
    If it is not available, either buy an alternative, start selling it yourself or go without.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  42. Congressional & Court, not PTO, Problem? by Koreantoast · · Score: 2

    I was told though that this isn't the fault of the Patent Office per say but of Congress and the courts' interpretation of the law. I think the PTO itself recognizes this weakness, but it would require legislation to change.

  43. Re:This isn't a first for Newegg. Also, great fake by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Pretty much this. Unlike others and probably for no good reason other than I am a creature of habit - it's not even so much about the trolls, but that's a nice value added benefit, I generally shop at NewEgg. I'm not horribly concerned about price and the prices are usually close-enough. Unless it's broken, I only buy what I wanted, so nothing gets returned and I don't have to deal with their restocking fee.

    When I've had an issue, I've had no problem returning it. That's seldom. I'm also honest about it - if I broke it then I don't just return it. If I buy a cheap device, instead of the more expensive device, and it doesn't work as well as I was hoping then I don't return it - so long as it works at all.

    So, I pretty much just go to NewEgg for tech gear. I also buy quite a bit of stuff from them. I'm always buying something new - I really need to unsubscribe from their mailings. I have the impulse control of a five year old and the bank account big enough to make it a problem. Fortunately, I'm not a hoarder and I'm not a huge fan of clutter. I'm always able to find some kind soul who's willing (often eager) to take my tech hand-me-downs. Given my obscene hardware refresh rates, impulse buys, and inability to remember what I was thinking when I bought half the stuff - I probably buy enough stuff to keep a good sized group of geeks amused, full time.

    Ah well... This won't actually change my buying habits. I pretty much just go to NewEgg and buy there already. It's very rare for me to buy hardware or tech items on Amazon and, if I do, it's probably a book or another damned impulse buy. Fortunately, maybe, the missus is a budding geek and will help me make use of the hardware. She's also pretty good with money, or so it seems so far, so maybe that will help - at least maybe she'll feel compelled to help me make use of some of those things that I buy.

    "Oh, look. Those hard drives are dirt cheap and a good brand. They've got good reviews, are just a year old now, and they're on sale? Yes, yes I can probably use ten of them. No, ship it today - it's important!" Sadly, I just had that conversation in my head a few days ago. I did (still sort of do) have a plan for those hard drives - except I have absolutely no need for them. A plan? Yes. A need? Not so much.

    Ah well... If you've ever wondered who those stupid emailings targeted? I'm that guy. You can unsubscribe. I probably should have done so years ago. "Oh, nice, they've got USB thumb drives on sale! I need a half dozen of those." At least my insanity goes to support a good company. I, umm... I don't suppose you need some extra hard drives?

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  44. Re: Newegg serve the UK, and other regions. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Damn, what's their website? ... Ah, the obvious newegg.co.uk ; it redirects to their UK section, with several other parts of Europe, India, Singapore and Australasia. So I guess the other similar names will redirect appropriately.

    Hmmm, beats my usual supplier by about 6% for a 4TB external hard drive. That is definitely worth remembering.

    Newegg's Marketing Department may have reason to go around to the Legal Department for a mutual high-five. I'd literally NEVER have considered them before because previously I'd seen "Newegg" and read "foreign" with an undertone of "not considered."

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  45. I may be about to buy 24 TB by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Funny, when you said "fortunately, I'm not a hoarder and I'm not a huge fan of clutter. I'm always able to find some kind soul who's willing (often eager) to take my tech hand-me-downs", I was mentally raising my hand. Have you seen on Mythbusters the big shelves of tubs in Jaime's shop, all neatly labeled with labels like "rubber body parts" and "linear motors"? That's me.

    Then as I began to think of a funny reply, you ended with "I, umm... I don't suppose you need some extra hard drives?" As a matter of fact, I'm about to buy 24TB of drives if a certain customer finalizes their order with me. I run a hot spare / backup service called Clonebox, so I buy several drives at a time, and put them in rack enclosures which hold 12-16 drives each.

    1. Re:I may be about to buy 24 TB by KGIII · · Score: 1

      How amusing and so very similar. One of the benefits of having accumulated a few dollars means that I have also accumulated some assets. I, too, keep them clearly labeled and have a whole bunch of storage for such. I could, without a doubt, put a hundred computers (of varied vintage) together just from parts at my home in Maine. That is not an exaggeration.

      I will warn you now, this is a long reply. I actually am adding this after hitting preview. Unlike many of my posts, I can't point to anything that you might not find interesting. I'm not certain but I try to be understanding. Ideally, you will find it interesting. I've read enough of your posts and interacted with you enough so I might be an accurate judge of character. You are, as always, free to read or not and to reply at will. I always enjoy our interactions.

      Then there are tools... I not only have an automotive garage but it is also a shop. I have my own hydraulic lift and boxes and boxes of tools. I do not always use them myself. I hire someone who comes in, every Saturday - even when I am not home he is working tomorrow in Maine while I am in Florida - to work on my collection. I have had this system in place for about eight years now and I appreciate the service.

      Err... It gets worse. I have a whole woodworking shop. In fact, it's the other half of that garage. To give an indicator of size, the garage is a six bay garage with full size space allotments for each bay. That too is kept neat and labeled. Tools can be borrowed, I'm generous like that. They need to be cleaned, maintained, and put back in the exact same place (including having handles facing the same direction) as you found them. That is not optional. Loss of access is certain if that is not adhered to.

      Then I have my house... You can drive in my basement. No, really. There's a garage door and you can drive in my basement. I'd rather you not, it's pretty full. Someone proudly posted that they have a 100' x 200' piece of property. That's smaller than my house. My girlfriend was picked up in my recent travels. She's never been to my home in Maine. She has seen the live video feed, will see the place this spring, and has seen pictures. I have a big house because I like space. There's a whole room, in the basement, dedicated solely to power. It has the battery banks, handles the switching, and collects the feeds from the mains, solar, wind, and backup generator. Believe it or not, the mains is my backup. I designed and drew my home, it's very efficient and intentionally so. It's not out of some urge to be green, that's a nice benefit, it's because I'm lazy and I like my creature comforts.

      Then there's another house on the property. That was/is a farmhouse from the 1840s. I was going to tear it down but I decided to have it rehabbed and part of it are used for storage. It's your traditional New England farmhouse with the various add-ons, attached summer-kitchen (probably not functional or in place for 100 years or more), traditional styled stable and carriage house. None of that has been in place for a lot of years - studying the changes has been a lot of fun and a mystery. The deconstruction phase of rehabilitation was very neat. I didn't just pay to have it done, I both helped and observed. I was active in all phases.

      I call that the guest house but it is really just the house that was here. It has five bedrooms, basement, attic, attached barn, with two levels, and an attached barn to that. The barn has racks, similar to those that you referenced, for storage in much of it. Some of it is quite valuable but it is all labeled, for the most part, and organized.

      Then I have a new "barn" that is designed to look like a barn but is really just storage for automobiles. It houses a lot of automobiles but does not, in fact, have room for, what is now officially, all 33 of them. There is an upper level, that has a whole bunch of storage, shelves, and is also full of labeled storage boxes. They are mostly automobile parts/memorabilia. They are all in mostly uniform box

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  46. yeah we'd hang out. Super Walmart organization by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If you were in Texas, we'd probably enjoy hanging out. I haven't yet collected THAT much stuff, but I'm not retired yet. :) I HATE to buy something to replace I've bought before and lost or gotten rid of, or rent something multiple times, so I buy stuff and keep it.

    As to organization, I looked to Super Walmart for inspiration. I try to more or less organize things the same way Walmart would. When a tub or shelf gets full, it's divided into two more specific tubs. Ie if I'm putting away dry-cell batteries and the tub is full, it gets divided into two tubs for two different types of batteries. You might have to treat your stuff more like a strip mall - the auto parts store area, the hobby shop area, etc.

    1. Re:yeah we'd hang out. Super Walmart organization by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That separation sounds good. I could probably use further refinement and better over-all organization and placement. I should give that some thought.

      Basically, it tends to stay where it was put. Eventually, I've ended up with so much stuff that to re-org would be a project from hell. To move things to change location? Also a project from hell. I did leave some spaces in - not as much as I could/should have.

      Mostly, it's about what will be closest and used in that area or what will be accessed most frequently is the closest to where I physically am. For some odd reason, and I'm not a collector by default but they were acquired, I have a rather large collection of old comics. Those are all stored properly but are down in the old barn area. I have several boxes full of 'em and boxes of boxes with them. (They had someone go over them and grade and price them. They then offered them to me at about a 1/10 retail price. That was some 25 years ago.)

      At any rate, I suspect we'd get along just fine. ;-) If I happen to be stomping through Texas, I'll let you know (assuming I remember and have the chance to do so) and we can take it from there. I'm currently in the Panhandle of Florida but I need to go home in the spring. Retirement has its perks, as does accumulation of a few dollars, but it still doesn't seem to quite afford enough time. I'd like to be far better organized than I am - and, yet, I'm pretty well organized. I'm thinking some real enterprise asset management/tracking solutions might actually go a long ways. I'd not need to track everything, or even keep some things up-to-date with effort, because they're either used so frequently that such would be impractical or because they're used so infrequently that they just don't move.

      I don't really like buying something that I've already bought again and discarded. So, I've lots of things that I needed only once or twice but have still kept. Knowing what I already own and keeping track of it - should actually help that. "Oh, wait. I don't have to buy X. I already own one." So, unless there's a compelling reason to buy a new X, I might just as well find and use the old one. I've bought multiple X items in the wood shop. I suspect that I get giddy around certain tools and just forget what I already owned. What, you mean you don't have a half-dozen dovetail jigs? The big question is why do I own them when I actually can make them faster, and just as nice, with a coping saw, chisel, and pencil? I even *prefer* to make them without a jig.

      Eventually it reaches the point where you not only can't move with a single rented truck but that you'd never even dream of packing and moving yourself. Nope. I'm rooted in Maine now. Unless you can magically get all that stuff from one place to another? Yeah.... There's probably a law of physics to describe it. It's probably not just gravity but that goes a long way to explain the acquisition of new stuff. (Also, it's my "stuff" but it'd be someone else's shit if they owned it. Funny how that works.) The kids (grown adults) still love going through my "shit" to see what I have. It kind of feels like they're pawing over my remains before I'm in the ground! (Not really, they're good kids. They just like seeing "Dad's old junk." They sometimes "borrow" the good stuff.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  47. In Texas we have that magic by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > you'd never even dream of packing and moving yourself. Nope. Unless you can magically get all that stuff from one place to another? Yeah.... There's probably a law of physics to describe it.

    In Texas, we call that mqgic force that moves thousands of pounds of stuff "Mexicans". You can find it at Home Depot.