Slashdot Mirror


Senators Blast Comcast, Other Cable Firms For "Unfair Billing Practices" (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Six Democratic US senators [Wednesday] criticized Comcast and other TV and broadband providers for charging erroneous fees, such as cable modem rental fees billed to customers who bought their own modems. The senators have written a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler asking the commission to 'stop unfair billing practices.'.....Last year, more than 30 percent of complaints to the FCC about Internet service and 38 percent of complaints about TV service were about billing...

31 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Very naught, naught boy by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is election time. So they say something that sounds nice to voters. Nothing will change. Even if they put up a bill, it will be changes so much that it will be law to do what they are doing.

    This is great, as they can always blame the other party. Both parties are guilty here.

    Let's be honest,the political game is lost to the companies for a long time now. They are able to fool enough of the people all of the time.

    I mean, even Sanders said that even if he got elected it might already be to late.

    There is a reason for separation between church and state. That is that a certain group might get influence over a majority that might think differently and only that groups interest will be looked at and not that of all. The same must happen with corporations. There must be a separation between business and state (and business and church, but that was covered 2000 years ago). Only then will there be a governement for the people by the people.

    Until then: I do welcome my old business overlords.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Very naught, naught boy by CeasedCaring · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It is election time. So they say something that sounds nice to voters. Nothing will change."

      The 3 laws of political campaigning:-

      1: Promise EVERYTHING
      2: Deliver NOTHING
      3: Blame the other lot

      and most important of all:-

      0: Don't get caught!

    2. Re:Very naught, naught boy by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're certainly welcome to be cynical, but let's take a look at the list of names here:

      Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)

      Several of these people have been talking about internet and technology issues for some time, and rather astutely (the Oregon senators), or have taken a very pro-consumer stance against abuse by corporations (Warren, Sanders). None of them are none for being shills or fair-weather friends on this sort of thing, and they've proven more than willing to put action and effort behind their words.

      Now if you really want to be cynical, bemoan the fact that they don't have enough power at present to accomplish anything versus the majority of (mostly Republican, though not all) legislators who are all too happy to suck up to Comcast/etc and proclaim idiotic things like "Net Neutrality hurts competition" or ranting about how Title II will stifle innovation when we're already getting left in the dust on connection speed by most of the developed world.

    3. Re:Very naught, naught boy by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      Even if they put up a bill, it will be changes so much that it will be law to do what they are doing.

      Why do they need to pass any new laws to address billing errors? If your cable company is billing you for a service or product that you didn't receive, isn't that just straight up theft? Existing laws already handle this situation.

  2. Love the trailing ellipsis by Rei · · Score: 2

    38 percent of complaints about TV service were about billing...

    Cue the creepy movie tension music!

    "It Came From The Billing Department 2: The Revenge Of Accounts Receivable"

    --
    It's times like this I wish I had a friend named 'The Professor'.
  3. Canal O'Rourke lost his job for trying to report by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Canal O'Rourke lost his job for trying to report comcast about billing errors.

    I say go for it and if it comes down to it. No easy time for the big shots.

  4. Consumerist stories about Comcast by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Consumerist stories about Comcast by Narcocide · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BBB has no authority whatsoever. They are not a branch of the government. They're a non-profit organization.

      You want the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) or the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) - why neither of THEM have even barely lifted a finger about this crap so far though is completely beyond me.

  5. They're digging their own grave. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been getting involved with the local government to get fiber to the area and the cable companies keep pushing back "Nah, you don't want that speed". To the point that it's hurting local businesses. Local fiber co-ops and companies are starting up across the state (slowly). The cities that still had municipal power & water mostly have fiber already.

    They're not going to be able to keep up with the competition springing up across the country.

    More and more people are cutting the cord as well. They could have taken a bit less of a profit and maintained their lead but they decided to double down on

    1. Re:They're digging their own grave. by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Comcast was dragging their feet in upgrading our community to fibre, telling us it was going to be years off.

      As soon as our town (Upper Marlboro, MD) passed an ordinance granting Verizon a franchise agreement, Comcast suddenly had crews out upgrading. Maybe it was a month or so delay ... whatever it was, they did everything they could to try to get their stuff installed before AT&T could. (and they were shutting down town roads without going through the proper procedures ... so residents were pissed off)

      Comcast will do everything that they can to make sure that they have no competition -- even pushing for state laws to ban municipalities from installing their own ... but as soon as it's inevitable that there's going to be competition, they'll do everything that they can to make sure that they keep the customers (and thus, make it less profitable for whoever new comes in).

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  6. So by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Among the little people and the petty criminals; 'invoice fraud' is a classic. You just pump out a whole bunch of reasonably plausible looking invoices for suitably generic goods or services, and hope that some of the recipients pay without checking too closely. Illegal, of course. Exactly how much 'unfair billing' and how many 'errors'(mysteriously in your favor much more often than not) do you have to accrue before people stop cringing and call your practices what they are, when not pulled by giant oligopolies?

  7. $6000 by EzInKy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's how much I saved cutting the cord five years ago. Still can't believe I was one of the idiots paying $12,000 a decade to watch TV.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:$6000 by EzInKy · · Score: 2

      Actually nearly right. My now 9 year old car was bought and paid for with cash. What many pay out in car payments is socked away for when I need a newer one. Neither a borrower nor a lender be.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    2. Re:$6000 by geekmux · · Score: 2

      And let me guess, you also saved $50,000 over the past few years by getting rid of your car and buying a wooden-frame fixie to ride to work too, right?

      Great comparison.

      At least no one here has to guess as to your fucking inability to discern between a luxury in life and a necessity.

    3. Re:$6000 by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Fuck off.

      $100 per month * 12 months is a lot of money to poor people like us. We'll just download the handful of TV shows we want to watch, and utilize OTA HD as well as pirate streams for sports.

      Again, fuck right off, and take some of the comcast management with you.

      If you are counting pirate streams in your cost reduction analysis then you are doing it wrong.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:$6000 by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 2

      I cannot believe you seriously posted that. Not everyone has such a short commute. Not everyone has such a short commute on roads that are safe enough to cycle on. Not everyone has such a short commute at times of days when it is light out (brings back to safety point, and lights help a little, but not enough).

      It must be nice to live in that world of yours where everything turns out just peachy for you. For the rest of us, we have to own a car. (well not everyone, but many of us).

      FYI, I have no issues cycling 10 miles, in fact, I have no issues cycling 100 miles at a time... as I am a cyclist (both road and mountain), so if I could cycle to work, I would.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    5. Re:$6000 by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 2

      Eh, not all cyclists are hipsters either... I take offense at that :P

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  8. Comcast: 6 ways to attempt to get customer service by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. Comcast offices built like fortresses by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had to return my parents Comcast equipment when we sold their house. I took it to the local Comcast office. I was stunned by the level of security. Inch thick bulletproof glass. You couldn't even touch the workers, everything had to be passed through lock boxes which would only open on one side at a time. I personally live in a rural area. The local cable company is located in a converted ranch house. You can walk in and talk to them at any time. Just a counter you can step around, not even a door in the way. If Comcast needs that level of security to protect the workers, it must be one of the most hated companies around.

    1. Re:Comcast offices built like fortresses by Zak3056 · · Score: 2

      The reason for the security is that it's a payment center. Think tens of thousands in cash on hand, with a LOT less of a law enforcement response than if you rob the local bank.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  10. Happened to me by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bought my own cable modem, had been using it for over a year when I finally decided to return Comcast's modem. Took it down to their local office and had the customer service rep. check the modem back into inventory and remove the rental fee from my account before leaving. The first month after having it removed everything was fine, there was no rental fee billed, the 2nd month after it re-appeared on my bill and they tacked on an extra charge for the prior month as well as sent a separate mailing notice to inform me they had noticed there was no rental fee on my account and it must have been a billing error on their part but not to worry as they weren't going to charge a penalty, just 2 months worth of rental fees. In order to have the issue resolved I had to call customer service and have them "open an investigation" to check with the local office to verify they had received my old modem back.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  11. All would be resolved if we could all lay cable by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The cable companies rape us and the socialists salivate at the chance of nationalizing things because a monopolized market has been created where no one is allowed to compete.

    I cannot lay cable against my cable company even in my own neighborhood. Last mile internet delivery is granted through local franchises and no one is permitted to trespass these. I can't pay a poll fee. I can't pay a conduit fee. I cannot run cable.

    I could very easily run fiber for my whole neighborhood RIGHT NOW giving everyone in my immediate area gigabit internet... on MY resources. The whole city? Obviously not. I'm just some guy. But my neighborhood... easy. But the law won't let me.

    And people don't connect this reality with the fact that they get raped by the cable companies.

    Imagine if there were but one sandwich shop... imagine how absurdly abusive it would be with prices, service, product quality. It would be bad.

    Well, that is what you've done with the exclusive franchise agreements. We don't need to nationalize our ISPs. We need to let more people... ideally everyone... run cable.

    Here some unimaginative fellow will say something like "I don't want lots of cables run along my street"... well, if lots of cables are being run then you don't see that because they'll be buried in a conduit.

    Next I might get someone saying something like "we don't have conduits right now to handle something that we're not at this moment doing"... to which I can only say "uh duh"... and yet if we changed the rules this sort of thing would become standard. Not literally tomorrow but within a few years.

    And what would government control? Well... the conduits. They'd have a network of pipes that people could run cable through and that they'd charge a flat fee to anyone running cable per foot or mile or whatever the proper distance is... The government wouldn't have to keep up with new technology or worry about anything in the pipe especially besides where the pipe went and how much room there was in the pipe for more cable. That's it.

    Set America free and the internet issue is GONE. The cable companies in that environment will either offer competitive non-fucking-stupid service... or go out of business. Like a light.

    And I won't have to listen to fucking communists talk about how everything would be better if we just let the government take control over everything.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  12. Gee... by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    funny how "unfair billing practices" is know as fraud when you aren't a corporation.

  13. Re: Canal O'Rourke lost his job for trying to repo by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Conal O'Rourke. Just in case anyone else tries to Google it.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  14. Re:Apple by havana9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, I don't know why Apple or some other tech company with vast amounts of idle cash doesn't just buy Comcast. I think that customers would be thrilled.

    Maybe it's because they know well that there are too many nails in the coffin to make Comcast a good and profitable company. If Google prefers to put a new fiber network I think it's because it's far cheaper to start from scratch on a new technology than to have to deal with legacy thechnology that will have to be mantained for existing users and the new technology that has to be deployed.

  15. Exactly what happened to me by stevegee58 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was billed by Comcast for a year for a cable modem rental even though I bought my own. Yes, I admit I should have been reading every line entry on my bill every month but I wasn't. When I discovered this error I called Comcast and they immediately admitted the mistake and stopped billing me for it. However when I asked for my money back for the $10/month for the previous 12 months they got all snippy and said I had only a 60 day window to challenge erroneous charges.
    So I filed a formal complaint with the FCC and within days I was called back by Comcast and credited the 12 months of erroneous charges. I highly recommend this path since it was so absurdly easy.
    I've very happy to hear I'm not alone in this.

  16. Re:drivel - nothing will change by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 2

    The senators speaking here are pretty consistently against corporate abuse, and have been pro-consumer, nevermind reasonably tech-astute (especially the Oregon senators). They're not the ones you should be slamming for taking bribes and doing nothing - these people actually walk the walk.

    The problem is that they're a minority in the senate, both in terms of being pro-consumer/anti-abuse, and in being part of the minority party. Contrast them to the Republicans that are busy decrying Net Neutrality, Title II, etc. And in fairness, not all republicans in congress are, and there's more than few corporate shills on the democratic side, but if we're talking about the loudest voices in each group, it's clear where the preferences tend to lie.

    And that's something that's important to remember - not that one party is good or bad, or to claim that one is pure and the isn't, but that it's absolutely NOT fair to just tar every single legislator with the same brush, and claim they're all the same. Some of them are CLEARLY better than others, and by refusing to recognize that, we're punishing the good along with the bad. We need to reward the good behavior, and punish the bad ones.

  17. Re:Seems legit. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Wrong. The 6 Congresspeople complaining about these billing practices are likely not the same ones who were responsible for the omnibus bill. In fact, they have lengthy track records of supporting consumer rights and good legislation for internet-related stuff.

  18. Re:Bernie Sanders by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 4, Funny

    BERNIE FOR PRESIDENT 2016

    "I'm With Stupid =>" #FeelTheBern

    Ah, a Trump fan. You are a moron.

    Productive and stimulating exchanges like this are why it's always a good idea to simplify debates on public policy into cartoonishly broad messages of support or antipathy towards particular politicians who might have little or no direct involvement in the issues at hand. This sort of thing really adds something to the discourse, and is always welcome.

  19. Why do senators need to be involved? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

    The last time I checked, fraud, extortion, and theft were all felonies. So stop all the chest-thumping and all the "OMG! the FCC!" nattering, and just enforce the fucking laws fer chrissake. Time to stop pretending that various service providers are somehow different than individuals who commit the same crimes. A corporation is a person before the law? Alright then, treat the corporations like persons - but go ALL the way, and start throwing asses in jails when and where appropriate. Some might say, "but in this case, we can only jail part of the person". I'm fine with that - how 'bout the head? Let's haul CEOs off in handcuffs. That'll cause a lot of second thoughts next time 'ripping off your own customers' is suggested as a viable business model.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  20. No, no it isn't. by stomv · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is election time.

    No it isn't, at least not generally. There are six senators that signed on:

    • * Bernie Sanders -- running for President now; up for reelection to the US Senate in November 2018.
    • * Ron Wyden -- up for reelection to the US Senate in November 2016.
    • * Jeff Merkley -- up for reelection to the US Senate in November 2020.
    • * Liz Warren -- up for reelection to the US Senate in November 2018.
    • * Ed Markey -- up for reelection to the US Senate in November 2020.
    • * Al Franken -- up for reelection to the US Senate in November 2020.

    Giving Bernie a "0 months until election" that is still an average of three years until these six are up for reelection. It's not election time.

    I get that you just don't trust the US elected politicians to do the work of the people. Fine. Feel that way. But don't spew factually inaccurate nonsense because you're either too ignorant of federal elections or too lazy to look it up. Perhaps a bit more civic engagement on your part might help prevent the old business overlords, hm?