Slashdot Mirror
Twitter Tackles Terrorists In Targeted Takedown (betanews.com)
Mark Wilson writes: Having previously battled trolls, Twitter has now turned its attention to terrorists and their supporters. The site has closed down more than 125,000 accounts associated with terrorism since the middle of 2015, it announced in a statement. Although a full breakdown of figures is not provided, Twitter says most of these accounts were related to ISIS. Having increased the size of its account review team, the site has reduced the time it takes to investigate accounts that are reported, and has also started to investigate 'accounts similar to those reported'.
firsT posT
Holy alliteration Batman!!
We need more of that.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
that you will be labeled a terrorist if you disagree with the agenda and the status quo, and thus not allowed on Twitter etc.
Of course twitter is a private service and can have whatever policies it wants. But when the whole world communicates with about 2 total services like that, silencing someone there is tantamount to complete censorship. It makes them go underground, where their message of hate becomes even harder to combat.
No, it's best to shine a bright light on their bullshit. Let them say it all they want. The right answer to offensive speech is (1) more speech that makes it clear how fucked up their world view is, and (2) giving people good ways to chose what they listen to, but putting that power in their own hands, not having a central authority decide what is acceptable and what is not.
Turning the internet into something controlled and "safe" is not a good idea, no matter how nasty the speech in question. But we're now centralizing all communication on Twitter and Facebook. The power to do this to ISIS is the power to do it to political dissidents and human rights activists and politically inconvenient people. We should think very, very carefully about what it means to give just a few companies that much control over how literally billions of people communicate.
Tremendous!
And so does the new, new Slashdot.
Titties!
twitter is private so it is in fact free to do as it wishes. twitter can be the prosecution, judge, and executioner, in a private space owned by it
but all people who love freedom will note well and remember , that by this action it is freely indicating that what it wishes is to do is to obey the western secular 'liberal' establishment and its agenda, same that is invading countries, looting resources, running torture camps, sanctioning coups, drone killing children, spying on everyone, etc etc,. twitter is willing to judge and brand those who disagree with that agenda (in its privately owned property), and perhaps sometimes advocate violent resistance to that agenda, as 'terrorists' ( note however that no physical violence is taking place in twitter and accounts of those who are convicted through due legal process of such violence elsewhere are not the issue here )
now we know twitter is a willing tool of some nasty people. just as twitter is free to cac like this, we are free to show contempt for that action, (unless we are ourselves specimens of lowest form of humanity to support what twitter is supporting)
I can do words too.
Give me a "C"!
Give me an "E"!
Give me an "N"!
Give me an "S"!
Give me a "O"!
Give me a "R"!
Give me a "S"!
Give me a "H"!
Fuck it! Nevermind!
I don't even care any more... I'm going to go taze tea party'ers in Deus Ex or something.
"Bah! Bah! Two Legs Good! Four Legs Better! MOOOO!"
I fear that despite all the scientific advancements we have made over the last two or three hundred years, despite the technology we now have at our disposal, we are descending into another dark age.
Basically, I would rather know what these crack pot followers of Mohamed or Jesus or whoever are up to than have it hidden from me. At least with openness there is some slight chance of entering into a debate about what really bothers them.
Why must we give our enemies equal air-time? I'd prefer to see them getting blown to bits with Hellfire and Brimstone, but will take Twitter bans as a second.
We all know how the slippery slope works, and we see it on Twitter. Banning actual terrorist groups, then shadowbanning conservatives, now fiddling with hashtags to prevent politically incorrect ideas. Just like Facebook, Twitter has gone down the path of "safe spaces" that will result in the death of all actual interaction, replaced by a Potemkin virtual village of happy idiots discussing inoffensive nonsense and celebrities
First they came for the trolls...I didn't care because I wasn't a troll.
Then they came for the terrorists...I didn't care because I wasn't a terrorist.
Then they came for the guys with ironic beards...and I started caring.
Twitter is mostly a bunch of loud mouths on witch hunts. If someone has a Twitter account, you probably don't want them as a friend.
And a damn terrorist. No criticism of Israel, whatsoever. Remember the Shoah. No Jew, ever, in history, ever engaged in an uprising.
I never knew twitter trolls were so bad.
This is all part of a larger trend of Twitter becoming increasing irrelevant, but much more interesting to me is the #RIPTwitter hashtag and Twitter's burying of it.
For everyone who hasn't been following Twitter recently, Twitter has announced that they're getting rid of the reverse chronological timeline and will be switching everyone over to an "algorithm-based curated out-of-order timeline" some time next week - essentially that horrible thing Facebook did to force companies to pay money to make their posts visible at the cost of real people having their posts buried. (It's the reason why that picture of your family will never show up but you'll routinely see posts from McDonald's, solely because one of your friends hit "like" on McDonald's years ago.) As part of this move, they're also no longer marking promoted tweets and hashtags as "promoted," instead they'll just be mixed in with everything else.
This has prompted a backlash and people started tweeting "RIP Twitter" - until Twitter blackholed tweets containing that phrase. So #RIPTwitter started trending instead. And then Twitter blackholed that as well, even though it was nearing a million tweets.
What we're watching is Twitter slowly cave in to the demands of advertisers at the expense of users. First it started going after "trolls" in an effort to prevent bad press. Now it's going after terrorists in a similar bid. Next up it will be actively filtering what we get to see on Twitter, and who knows what biases that's going to be enforcing, but based on what it chooses to run in Twitter Moments, the one thing we can be sure of is that it will be biased.
All in the name of promoting advertisers who all pretty much agree that Twitter is useless as an advertising platform.
#RIPTwitter.
"The site has closed down more than 125,000 accounts associated with terrorism"
^ This, folks is what's known as propaganda and it's utter BS.
It doesn't take more than a couple of seconds of logical thought to realise that either the 125,000 number is wrong or the accounts are not associated with terrorism, unless you include talking about terrorism to mean 'associated with terrorism'
It's sad that people fall for this kind of crap.
Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
Twitter Tackles Terrorists Through Targeted Takedown
The original headline could imply that the terrorists were in the middle of a targeted takedown when twitter tackled them.
I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
Maybe not censorship in Milo's case, but certainly an petty gesture of intolerance towards ideological infidels.
Wow, you're good at this. A little TOO good.
You are welcome on my lawn.
if terrorism is maiming and killing innocents to incite fear in forwarding a political or religious agenda...
wouldn't that make the United States government the biggest terrorists on the planet? So Twitter will be taking down accounts of them and their supporters?
Either what these users say is illegal or not. If it's legal, they should let people voice their opinion even if they disagree with it. If it's not legal, then they should hand it over to police.
In fact, this should even be prohibited. Letting companies do some proactive censoring is the worst idea ever, both for the companies and for society as a whole.
I wonder what their definition of 'terrorists' is, somehow I bet it isn't quite what people are thinking. When the US was bombing the heck out of Iraq/Afghanistan they simply labeled everyone that they killed as "terrorists". When it started to come to light that women and pre teen children were included in those numbers they did finally limit their tally, to including anyone they killed who was armed, including reporters with large scary cameras.
The user you requested does not exist, no matter how much you wish this might be the case.
GamerGate is a hashtag, not a theocracy you intellectually bankrupt monkey. Al Baghdadi does indeed speak for every member of IS.
CIA account is still active.
Yeah. "Professional Victims"? Double-plus good!
His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
You mean intolerance against people who repeatedly violate the Twitter ToS, right?
The problem is there aren't enough people that care about liberty and freedom in any one place to have a political impact. We just don't have the numbers on our side. We can change that, but we need to focus our energies and group like-minded thinkers together to have an impact. First it'll be at a local level, and from there who knows. But spread out we end up in this situation where our votes and political clout are non-existent. The Free State Project is trying to fix this by attracting people to sign up to liberty and move to a low population state where we'll actually be able to make an impact. 20,000 people isn't that many, but it can have an undue influence on politics in such a low population state. If we can prove that this will work - and it's already working (10% of signers have already moved) then we can achieve lots of small successes and that will attract more liberty-minded people. There are other states that are ahead of New Hampshire in different areas- but eventually these efforts will peter out. If we want a long term solution to these issues across the board with all sorts of freedom-related issues we need to gather together to fight it.
Twitter is a business, they can do that. Fuck you Ratzo.
Just put them in a black hole so nobody else on the Internet sees the tweets unless you're logged into said account. And maybe people on law enforcement accounts used to track the terrorists.
Deltron 3030 - Virus (music video)
are they going after those exterminationist-terrorists? Just asking.
Twitter is too massive. Also, we have no good alternatives to twiiter. There is no other twitter-like service we can go to. It should not be considered private. And yes, I realize this means many other companies should not be considered private as well. I, frankly, do not understand public apathy toward gigantic monopolies like twitter, facebook, amazon, google, micrsoft, oracle, etc.... All of these companies need to be split into at least 3 competing parts. Yet, the U.S. government is in bed with Big Business and Wall Street.
Bernie 2016!
..is what I meant
You might want to hold off until you can actually win an argument before you tell someone to "read a book". Also, likely not a great idea to throw a sardonic "you win" temper tantrum at the same time. You've been around for a few years, so I figured these things would be second nature to you by now.. guess I was wrong.