Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Launches Trust and Safety Council To Help Put End To Trolling (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Twitter has announced a new trust and safety council to stamp out bullying and trolling on the microblogging site. The Twitter Trust & Safety Council will initially be formed of around 40 bodies, including the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, ICT Watch, NetSafe, and Samaritans. These organisations, along with safety experts, academics and security researchers, will work to ensure a safe and secure platform for users to express themselves freely and safely. The Council's main focus will be to protect minors, encourage 'greater compassion and empathy on the internet,' and promote efforts in media literacy and digital citizenship. Community groups will also participate to help prevent online 'abuse, harassment, and bullying,' as well as mental health problems and suicide.

105 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. This is a bad idea. by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I dislike trolling, when you attempt to put controls onto a system, you end up destroying that system.

    1. Re: This is a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mostly this, the people they have hired have made a career of washing all commentary on their work as trolls.

    2. Re: This is a bad idea. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who gets to define "Trolling" and "Bullying". My guess, suddenly all sorts of speech will be suddenly labels "Micro-aggression" and be banned.

      "I'm voting for _________" -- not politically correct candidate = BANHAMMER!!!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re: This is a bad idea. by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, obviously if you're voting for _________ then you must be a racist and sexist. So anything you say is hate speech.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:This is a bad idea. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      when you attempt to put controls onto a system, you end up destroying that system.

      Really?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:This is a bad idea. by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not just a bad idea, it's not an enforceable system. What's the difference between trolling and arguing, or trolling and someone whose honest opinion just happens to deviate beyond a certain distance from what's considered the norm? It's like trying to set down rules as to what is and is not 'art'; it can't be done.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:This is a bad idea. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The name is a hoot and a half: "Trust and Safety Council". This sounds like something I would expect to see in a dictatorship, like North Korea, the former East Germany, Soviet Russia or a fistful of Middle East Sheikdoms.

      Let's just call it what it really is: "Board of Censorship".

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re: This is a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who gets to define "Trolling" and "Bullying". My guess, suddenly all sorts of speech will be suddenly labels "Micro-aggression" and be banned.

      "I'm voting for _________" -- not politically correct candidate = BANHAMMER!!!

      This is nothing terribly new, Twitter is just being a little more open about the fact that the truth is not welcome on their system.

      There are all sorts things I can say, that are factual statements and can be proven to be true, that will get me banned from a lot of places on the Internet.

    8. Re: This is a bad idea. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Yes the look and feel will be like any web 2.0 site under some theocracy, despotic monarchy, military dictatorship, fascist or communist government.
      Most nations have their own safe sites in their own languages that have a role for locals. Why join another big site to be tracked, reported on and corrected?
      Group think sets in and a very chilling system after posting with ip's tracked, user banned and facing chat downs.

      Good news for any new or older social media site in the USA that can promote and protect freedom of speech and freedom after speech.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:This is a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It makes sense when you realize that they don't want users to trust them and feel safe, what they're trying to do is convince advertisers that they can trust Twitter and that it's a safe platform to advertise on. There are so many stories of Twitter advertising campaigns coming back to bite the advertisers as hashtags get co-opted by users, that Twitter needs to convince advertisers that they can block that from happening in the name of "preventing trolls."

      They're also hoping to score some leftist points with the type of people who hate freedom of speech in the name of creating "safe spaces" while distracting them from the reality that they don't care about them, either, they just want to make sure advertisers don't have to listen to user complaints.

    10. Re:This is a bad idea. by T.E.D. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. Slashdot put moderation in about 15 years ago, and look how destroyed it is now.

    11. Re:This is a bad idea. by Bodhammer · · Score: 2

      Minitrue

      “War is peace.
      Freedom is slavery.
      Ignorance is strength.”

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    12. Re:This is a bad idea. by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      I was thinking "Commitee of Public Safety". Complete with Mme LeFarge shrieking "OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!"

    13. Re: This is a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Grep! Gabber gobbler!! Your micro-agressive post was triggering for me you fat, racist, misogyonerd, neckbeard, rapist, loser, white, cis male! You hate women and are on the wrong side of history you entitled shitlord!! Your rights to an internet end where my feelings begin, so expect you internet privileges to be taken away you MRA rape culture promoter!

      Twitter isn't going far enough. And Slashdot needs to ban your kind. Please donate to my Patreon to make this possible. Do it or I'll call my media contacts.

    14. Re:This is a bad idea. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If someone is breaking the law then providing tools to help gather evidence and support their prosecution is not usually considered censorship. Serious trolling is often illegal.

      More over, Twitter is a private platform. They can set whatever standards they want, and don't owe anyone a platform. Like all private forums, they have to balance the ability to say anything against the desire to provide a platform to the greatest number of people and avoid creating an echo chamber with everyone screaming at each other. We have 8chan, the most extreme example of nearly unlimited speech (although still required to comply with US law), and it's not that popular, so I can see why Twitter doesn't want to emulate it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:This is a bad idea. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      For someone whose other posts in this thread give the impression that you support this move by Twitter, I find it rather amusing that you're complaining about the moderation system being used to silence you (which it really doesn't since many users browse at -1 and several like myself have troll/flamebait posts set to +5) in this post.

      You're a fool if you somehow think the same won't happen at Twitter, or worse yet if you just don't care.

    16. Re: This is a bad idea. by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Sanders also fill the blank in quite several places now.
      "Bernie bros" etc..

    17. Re:This is a bad idea. by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      Ok then, what do you suggest doing instead? Let's start by accepting the goals of protecting minors and encouraging compassion and empathy. (Maybe you don't agree with those goals, but that's irrelevant. Twitter has set them as goals, and it's their platform. Besides, most people outside the Slashdot bubble would agree with them.) So what do you recommend they should do to promote them?

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    18. Re:This is a bad idea. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Face it Twitter is the kindergarten play ground of public forums. They basically want to control it by gagging the children and chaining them to a stake in the ground so they can't pester each other. Any idiot can scream anything, at one point you just have to give up and walk away from Twitter, from the start most said it would simply fail for this exact reason and Twitter are desperate to keep it going because of the quite silly pretend worth of Twitter and the total bullshit level of advertising and PR=B$ et al on there.

      If they do find it amusing to sit in a tree and tweet angrily at the other 'hmmm' twits so be it, don't like doing that, well, I am afraid they will just have to give up 'twit' roost and walk away from twitter. It is it's very nature, never went on there for that exact reason and I really just do not get it. It really has to be quite the most empty narcissist activity imaginable.

      Don't like the mess that twitter is, simply erase the account and never go back.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:This is a bad idea. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah but who here doesn't love an unaccountable tribunal? I mean, the name Trust and Safety Council just drips with power! Can't you feel it? Your inner Klingon? Wwwwooof!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:This is a bad idea. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Face it Twitter is the kindergarten play ground of public forums. They basically want to control it by gagging the children and chaining them to a stake in the ground so they can't pester each other.

      If you've ever had a kindergarten age kid, you will recognize the appeal of this idea.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:This is a bad idea. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The difference is, despite what the MRAs and anti-feminists scream, Twitter doesn't try to stop people saying unpopular things. It only acts when they start abusing other users.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re: This is a bad idea. by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      The impression I got was that they actually want to encourage free speech and make people feel safe expressing their views - I don't imagine it's actually an anti Trump voter thing. What they're trying to stop is all the bullying and death threats, and there's plenty of that happening on both sides of the political fence, so it should actually *help* the Trump voters express themselves.

      The internet's been especially bad for this ever since all that "gamergate" shit where suddenly if you express any hint of slight left-leaning views you're slapped with that massively overused SJW acronym and all kind of derision for that, if you're more towards the right and criticise actual hard-left views you're "OMG misogynist death eater shitlord from Hell" and there's like nothing in between any more. It's ridiculous. And nerds are the worst for it now. What happened to when we were all about the Star Trek "love and harmony between different cultures and people who hold different views" kind of stuff and could actually talk about social issues and whatnot without hurling abuse at each other? I think that's all Twitter's after. I'm all for it.

    23. Re: This is a bad idea. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      once again the king of strawmen has misrepresented the issue.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    24. Re: This is a bad idea. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I agree. As a recent example, a woman I know on Twitter was harassed by a group of people. Her "crime"? She adopted two white kids and two black kids and this group of white supremacists couldn't let that stand. I looked through some of their tweets and felt like I needed to bleach my eyes/brain. (The tame tweets called her black children "things" and "pets." I won't repeat what the non-tame ones said.) Many of the people said they went to her website, downloaded all photos of her kids, and planned to use them in malicious ways. When they were reported, they accused her of harassing them for reporting them for harassment. (I've found that bullies often declare you reporting their behavior as "wrong" but see their actions as completely fine. They try to set the rules to be in their favor.)

      Now, I'm all for free speech, but if you're harassing someone (not disagreeing with them, but actively harassing), then you shouldn't be surprised if you're booted from the service. Not doing this will make people less likely to post on your service for fear of coming under attack.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    25. Re: This is a bad idea. by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      Please provide examples and sources of this actually happening on Twitter involving the Twitter staff.

    26. Re:This is a bad idea. by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      Oh they're accountable, Mr. Woof. To the shareholders. Like any other publicly traded business.

    27. Re: This is a bad idea. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Because censorship has never been abused!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    28. Re: This is a bad idea. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      And wil that stop people saying it?

      Hint : answer is not affirmative.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. ...and in other news: by martinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Twitter Launches Church Of We Don't Like Your Opinion So We're Going To Brand You A Troll Council to Help Put End To Hurt Feelings

    1. Re:...and in other news: by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      This is something that Slashdot already does. They'll clearly be infringing on some sort of patentrightmark or something...

    2. Re:...and in other news: by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Criticize Islam: Banhammer for hate speech
      Criticize Christianity: [crickets]

      Criticize women's rights movement: Banhammer for misogyny
      Criticize men's rights movement: [crickets]

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:...and in other news: by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think it's bad in me, you should meet Anita Sarkeesian.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:...and in other news: by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Your opinions make me feel unsafe. Shouldn't Slashdot be a safe place for everyone? We must get authorities involved. This is a safety concern, after all.

    5. Re:...and in other news: by Coren22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      will work to ensure a safe and secure platform for users to express themselves freely and safely.

      Unless you have an opinion that differs from someone else's. Or if we think you are a troll, because restricting free speech is the quickest way to allowing people to express themselves freely.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:...and in other news: by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Wow. Its pretty darn clear you haven't actually tried either of those. Unless by crickets you mean Locusts.

    7. Re:...and in other news: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Again with the third person? You really are a pathetic creature, aren't you?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:...and in other news: by martinux · · Score: 2

      I'll hand myself in as one of those disgusting monsters who tries to form an evidence-based opinion.

      I'm trying my best to paint anyone who criticises an opinion given by a back person as a racist, a woman as misogynist or a trans person as... anti-trans?
      I... I just need to learn to start treating people I don't know as victims who can't survive without my help, especially those who don't want it.

    9. Re:...and in other news: by Kohath · · Score: 1

      I... I just need to learn to start treating people I don't know as victims who can't survive without my help, especially those who don't want it.

      Or just shut up and applaud on cue.

    10. Re:...and in other news: by Kurrelgyre · · Score: 1

      It's different when you're in a position of power relative to another group, and have been for centuries or longer.

    11. Re:...and in other news: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Troll

      It's easy to see that you are wrong. Richard Dawkins regularly criticises Islam and doesn't get banned, along with good many followers and sympathetic minds. That includes posting cartoons of Mohammed.

      The large number of un-banned anti-feminists proves that criticism women's rights isn't a banable offence. Yiannopoulos is still there, despite saying threats to rape were just a normal male way of expressing displeasure with an argument. Roosh V is still there, the rapey bastard.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:...and in other news: by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Yiannopoulos is still there

      Did they give him back his "verified" status yet? What was it even taken away for? It's obvious which way the wind is blowing.

    13. Re:...and in other news: by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      The large number of un-banned anti-feminists proves that criticism women's rights isn't a banable offence.

      And that doesn't stop them from forcing people to delete tweets that they find objectionable, like pointing out their logical fallacies. But twitter's "harassment team" is fine with stuff from Jessica Valenti or Andrea Dworkin's screaming "kill all men" or writing about how they'd other things to happen.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re:...and in other news: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Do you have any specific examples of tweets that were forcefully deleted for pointing out logical fallacies without breaking any laws or other Twitter rules?

      Also, you Dworkin "quote" isn't a quote, she never said that. If I'm wrong, please provide a citation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:...and in other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When the problem of male suicide is laughed at by a Member of Parliament (UK, Labour), then the fact there is a mens rights movement is justified.

    16. Re:...and in other news: by dywolf · · Score: 1

      oh look, ignorance modded insightful by ignorant mods.

      its like when people say "but what about white history month" ... completely oblivious to the fact that the entire point is that white history month is better known as "the other 11 months of the year".

      ie, more of the same "im against political correctness because I want to be a bigoted prick"

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    17. Re:...and in other news: by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Criticize Islam: Banhammer for hate speech

      That's only because Islam has so many fanboys on here :D

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    18. Re:...and in other news: by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      Reading further down in that twitter post actually details why those tweets needed to be deleted. What Sushi was doing is called Sea-Lioning and is considered as Spam under Twitter's rules.

    19. Re:...and in other news: by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, black history was still included in history curricula for the full 12 months of the year. Though I would just love to see a teacher try to function under your ignorant premise and announce that she won't be covering the Civil Rights movement or slavery because "Every other month but February is for white history." I'm sure that wouldn't cause a fucking uproar.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  3. Safe Space to Express Yourself Freely by casings · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These organisations, along with safety experts, academics and security researchers, will work to ensure a safe and secure platform for users to express themselves freely and safely.

    So you are free express yourself, as long as you express yourself in a way approved by these organizations?

    What fucking hypocritical bullshit.

    1. Re:Safe Space to Express Yourself Freely by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Freedom of speech, just watch what you say.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Safe Space to Express Yourself Freely by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Why do you care so much what Twitter, a private company that you no doubt avoid because of tracking and all social media being a stupid scam where you are the product, does?

      8chan still exists, now 4chan has sold out to the SJWs and banned GamerGate. Oh, but even 8chan has rules. You can still run your own server. There is even TOR if you need it.

      Why do you feel Twitter in particular owes you a platform?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Twitter's doing NOTHING. Yay! by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    So Twitter's solution to their unfettered harassment problem is a 40 person committee?

    Basically, this is a nice way of saying they won't be doing anything, but perhaps paying protection money into some industry groups so that they won't complain any more.

    They can completely change the concept of a feed, and throw out the character limit that has been the defining feature of the service since its inception. But actual tools to allow users to manage asshats on the service (like even /. has had for nearly 20 frigging years)? Ohhh, that's too radical. How about we appoint a committee ...

  5. Safe & Secure by sexconker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    safe and secure platform for users to express themselves freely and safely

    As long as your free expression doesn't piss off any of the 40 busybody groups, of course.

  6. f + s = k by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    God, I'm so stupid. Here I've been hanging out on the internet for decades now, and I never once realized in all that time that all we had to do to make everyone nice to each other all the time was to institute draconian levels of censorship based on arbitrary rules decided upon by the most hypersensitive and litigious subgroups in the community.

    1. Re:f + s = k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      #RIPTwitter #SJWCancerRules #SafeSpaces

  7. Wrong Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only way to get rid of trolling is to teach people not to give a flying fuck what other people think about them.

    Only then will it just not matter what other people say, and they will either stop saying stuff, or just be ignored.

    1. Re:Wrong Approach by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry I but I still think they should care enough to wear deodorant.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  8. Really? by charlesj68 · · Score: 1

    encourage 'greater compassion and empathy on the internet'

    Why am I envisioning King Canute commanding the tide?

  9. "platform for users to express themselves freely" by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Informative

    Translation: Complete freedom to agree with the left just as much as you like.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  10. Re:"platform for users to express themselves freel by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Translation: Complete freedom to agree with the left just as much as you like.

    Yeah there's definitely a bias. Unfortunately that means for a lot of users will not be using twitter much which seems to be the plan. It's all puppies and rainbows on Twitter

      #FuckThat

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  11. Mod by XXongo · · Score: 1
    Why don't they just do what /. does, and implement mod points?

    Wait, maybe some of the mods might be biased... I know, how about also implementing meta-moderation?

  12. Need to stop patent / trademark trolling as well by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Need to stop patent / trademark trolling as well

  13. Autists trying to script social interation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This hypocritical attitude is getting to be a problem all over the place. It's not just Twitter.

    For example, just look at the Rust programming language project. They have a very bureaucratic and tyrannical code of conduct. Beyond that, they even have a moderation team that will go after anyone deemed to have "violated" the code of conduct!

    What I think we're seeing in cases like this are autists of one degree or another trying to "script" social interaction.

    What I mean by that is that they're people who are used to working with software, and not so used to dealing with people. They wrongly expect that it's possible to control social interaction as strictly as one controls a computer.

    It's like their codes of conduct are meant to be computer programs that a person executes whenever they want to participate in any sort of a community discussion. The codes of conduct try to take away the human aspect of communication, and replace it with something much more automated in nature.

    Of course, social interaction is far too nuanced to be something that can be automated away like they seem to want to do.

    I think the hypocrisy arises because they're unable to realize how inherently contradictory, and thus impossible, their goals are. You can't have free expression when people have to follow a script in order to communicate. You can't have a free exchange of ideas if anyone who deviates even slightly from the prescribed method of discussion is eliminated (by banning or moderation).

    What makes it even stranger is that the Rust contributors are overwhelmingly white males. For all their talk about how important diversity is, they have one of the most uniform communities around!

    I think that their extensive code of conduct has only served to make the Rust community less diverse. I think it may have helped drive away anyone who is different from the Rust norm, leading to the monoculture we see today.

    1. Re:Autists trying to script social interation? by bmo · · Score: 4, Informative

      For example, just look at the Rust programming language project. They have a very bureaucratic and tyrannical code of conduct.

      Ok, let's look at, specifically, what they define as harrassment:

      4. Unacceptable Behavior

      The following behaviors are considered harassment and are unacceptable within our community:

      Violence, threats of violence or violent language directed against another person.
      Sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, ableist or otherwise discriminatory jokes and language.
      Posting or displaying sexually explicit or violent material.
      Posting or threatening to post other peopleâ(TM)s personally identifying information ("doxing").
      Personal insults, particularly those related to gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or disability.
      Inappropriate photography or recording.
      Inappropriate physical contact. You should have someoneâ(TM)s consent before touching them.
      Unwelcome sexual attention. This includes, sexualized comments or jokes; inappropriate touching, groping, and unwelcomed sexual advances.
      Deliberate intimidation, stalking or following (online or in person).
      Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behavior.
      Sustained disruption of community events, including talks and presentations.

      You have a problem with these? Then stay out. None of these rules are unreasonable. Indeed, since you find them so unreasonable that you have to whine here about it, you sound like the kind of person that any group, that wants to get anything done, should keep out, lest they be trolled into wasting time on your moronic nonsense.

      I seriously wonder what you would have done, 25 years ago, when "unprofessional behavior" would have gotten you booted off the entire Internet.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Autists trying to script social interation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please define "violent language", "discriminatory jokes and language" and "personal insults, particularly those related to gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or disability." Also, please explain how "unwelcome sexual attention" differs from welcome sexual attention and how to avoid giving the unwelcome kind. Perhaps an instructive video can help.

    3. Re:Autists trying to script social interation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have a problem with these?

      I have a problem with this...

      Sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, ableist or otherwise discriminatory jokes and language.

      Even a non-gender neutral pronoun is considered "sexist language" by some. Context is everything. When we allow freedom of expression to be curtailed by the over-sensitive, we encourage the victims of bullying to become bullies.

      -- sent from my GAYPhone

    4. Re:Autists trying to script social interation? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      But nowadays we apparently have thin-skinned man-children creating self-contradictory codes of conduct

      Why yes you are right, I do believe I have just spotted one.

    5. Re:Autists trying to script social interation? by raynet · · Score: 1

      Also sometimes a personal insult is in order, especially when said person is acting like a dolt.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
  14. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  15. Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Are trolls and spamsters a problem on Twitter?

    Sure.

    Are moronic 12 yo boys and the adult males that act like that and harass women on Twitter a problem?

    Sure.

    Will this work?

    Nope.

    Only public shaming works.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn shame our justice system stopped using pillories, isn't it?

    2. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why all the sexism? Are you saying that women can't possibly be the trolls? Or is it agism, that trolling people is somehow a 12 year old thing? Perhaps you should expand your horizons and realize that ANYONE can troll, including the ones making up these rules!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Um, logic fail. If I state A means B, and you say C means B, that does not mean both are not true.

      it's not my job to describe C means B. I leave that up to GG.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, APK, how does it feel to Troll on an article about trolling? If Slashdot worked the way that Twitter is trying to setup, you wouldn't be able to post anymore. How would that make you feel?

      You are essentially giving an example of exactly what Twitter doesn't want any more of. People who post all about how awesome they are, and how terrible the other person is, just because they can't win an argument. It is like exactly what the definition of a troll is. You must live under a bridge.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any opinion not in the group is trolling.

    6. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by cybordeath · · Score: 2

      You don't get BITCHSLAPPED all the time APK?
      When are you going to register an account anyways? It isn't particularly hard to do as you can see

      I heard ZDNet gave your HOSTS engine 0/5 stars oooooh burn!

    7. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting twist on this discussion of censorship, trolls, SJWs et al:

      http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

      For those who don't feel like clicking, it is a first-time poster tattling on APK to a hoster of his software about all his evil deeds here on ./ in an attempt to get his software pulled. Don't get me wrong, I think that is an entirely appropriate if not overdue or at least kind of funny response. It does however seem to smell a little SJW-y, no? Leaving the forum of free discussion and attempting to cause real-life damage to somebody because of some shitty things they said online? We all (you guys) agreed that was bad when we (you guys) made up the term 'SJW', right?

      And yet, we are all tired as fuck of reading these idiotic screeds and would probably prefer they not be here at all, and that the maniac who has been making them get some comeuppance for assaulting our eyeballs and mouse wheels all this time, right? Could this be the case that actually gets us to agree that each case of online assholery -> real life retribution is subjective and has it's potential merits and has to be judged individually? Or is it only when it specifically skews to a progressive political issue with which you disagree that it counts as 'SJW'?

      Coren22, I have to assume that the poster is you for the simple reason that, christ, enough is enough right? Maybe it's not. Either way I am curious: as somebody who seems to be in the camp I described above, what is your take on this? Is it an attack on free speech, or just an asshole getting what is coming to him?

    8. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The post you link to was not me. I am against censorship, even of people that I disagree with. I post in response to APK to try and help him improve himself and his product, but I would make no effort in having it removed.

      I totally agree with you though that it is SJWish to try and censor him through making Steve aware of how bad APK makes him look by being associated with the trolling campaign that APK put me through previously.

      I also think it is kind of funny that that post got APK to admit that he was out of line and that he would stop, but as soon as I try to defend others against his harassment, he starts his harassment up again against me.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    9. Re:Which part of Edit feature do they not GET? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      1. I don't advertise anything, I however am very vocal about disproving your advertising.
      2. What efforts? I never did anything to try and get Dice or hpHosts to do a damn thing. You are after all replying to my post saying that it wasn't me, and giving the reason I wouldn't do such a thing.
      3. If the new Slashdot owners decide to ban you, it will be because of your behavior, not because I did anything to cause it, and you can only have yourself to blame as you intentionally make efforts at avoiding the AC controls to perform these harassment campaigns of yours.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  16. Re:What a bunch of stupid fucks... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Funny

    I saw them all in a gay orgy last night

    That was the Monday night meeting of the men's rights movement.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. Re:"platform for users to express themselves freel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    #RIPTwitter #SJWCancerRules #SafeSpaces #MyFeelings

  18. Maybe Twitter Can Hookup With Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Both Twitter and Wired seem to want to self destruct.

    More power to them!

  19. Twitter Launches Trust and Safety Council To by taustin · · Score: 1

    ensure that only approved trolling and bullying can be done on their web site.

    If Twitter mattered, it might be disturbing. But since, if you have something you can say in 140 characters, you have nothing to say, who cares?

  20. Re:#RIPTwitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People familiar with Twitter might notice that, much like the plans to increase the length of a tweet to 10,000 characters, this basically removes the entire point of the service.

    Twitter is, and has always been, completely pointless bullshit.

    It's all part of the Silicon Valley Scam. A company that has never made a profit, loses hundreds of millions of dollars a year, and yet has a market cap of over $9 Billion.

  21. You always get what you deserve by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I am continually amazed at just how bad the tech industry is at basic concepts of governance.

    Hey we created this platform where everyone who wants to shout can be heard by everyone .. now what type of behaviors would one guess this would tend to reinforce? Try not to think too hard about it.

    You can't police fundamentally deleterious structures away.. sure you can try.. you can always attempt to beat people into compliance but eventually the unsurprising outcome is a failed police state.

    If you really want to solve the problem you have to fundamentally change the underlying incentive structure such that people conclude on their own that they WANT to do something constructive.

    Of course doing so may well not be in Twitters best financial interests. I suspect strongly they know that and are just trying to have it both ways by pretending to give a shit.

  22. Re:What a bunch of stupid fucks... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Did you enjoy the meeting?

    Yes. The meeting was held in Roosh V's mom's basement. She made rice krispy squares.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  23. Freedom isn't free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These organisations, along with safety experts, academics and security researchers, will work to ensure a safe and secure platform for users to express themselves freely and safely.

    So you are free express yourself, as long as you express yourself in a way approved by these organizations?

    What fucking hypocritical bullshit.

    You are also free to take your expression to another platform that better suits your sensibilities. Or start your own.

  24. They failed by penguinoid · · Score: 2

    Twitter Launches Trust and Safety Council To Help Put End To Trolling

    They already failed. What's next, the Orwellian Council of Freethinkers?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:They failed by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /asrcasm "Sorry, your speech has been flagged for being subversive and causing dissent. For blasphemy of original thought, Citizen, you are charged with the Crime of Heresy; you have been re-assigned for Re-Indoctrination of Censorship and Sensitivity Training until you learn to express yourself in only official approved conduct that "We, the powers that be, Deem Fit." Have a nice day."

      Translation: We're a bunch of wussies intolerant of other people expressing their opinion and instead want to dictate to others our myopic and idiotic viewpoints because everyone is a special snowflake that is offended by everything and everyone.

      Yeah, fuck you Twitter.

  25. So the few (trolls) get to hurt the many? by rlh100 · · Score: 2

    Internet trolls have not been able to control their urges to hurt random innocent people. Make no mistake about it. The rape and death threats, the bulling, really do hurt people.

    Twitter has finally gotten enough feed back from their customer base that trolling, bulling and other forms of online harassment are unacceptable. I am please that they are trying to do something about it. They will probably make some missteps. But they will make twitter better for most people and immensely better for a few people who are the target of the attacks.

    If you don't like twitter trying to mildly enforce some simple rules of social decency and common courtesy, then go find some other free service and spew your vitriol there. That way the larger community can ignore you.

    I have no sympathy because my adult daughter received her first rape threat when she was 11 when she posted a comment to a gamer forum. Just call me a California liberal but social decency and common courtesy make the world a better palace to live despite what Trump spews.

    RLH

    1. Re:So the few (trolls) get to hurt the many? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      How about you ask your daughter whether she'd rather be free to express herself, or have the certainty that if she receives an inappropriate twit, that the throw-away account used to make it will be banned (and might get her own main account banned if she writes a twit that offends someone).

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:So the few (trolls) get to hurt the many? by rlh100 · · Score: 2

      No need to ask. I know that she, like 99.9% of all women would gladly put some limits on how she expresses herself if that meant reducing the vitriol and hate she gets on a frequent basis.

      You are obviously a guy. Guys do not understand how women look at personal safety. A woman's personal safety is something she is aware of ALL the time. I call this a woman's safety tape. Sometimes it is in the distant background like when she is at home protected by locked doors. But during the day when she is out in public she is probably continuously evaluating her personal safety. Most of the time it is to say she "I am safe at this moment". But she probably regularly goes on high alert aware of her surroundings, who she is talking to, checking her actions and words, Keeping an escape plan in the back of her mind.

      In general men have no concept of a woman's sense of personal safety. I only actively think about my personal safety when I go into a "bad" area, a dark alley, or am being actively confronted. I generally do not think about walking down the street or being in a public place. When a man gets a death threat or a rape threat, he can laugh it off because because he is a man. It is probably not a real threat. For a woman on the other hand it all threats are serious and real threats. Women get killed, raped, hurt every day. Just look at the news.

      If you doubt me, ask your women friends, your sisters, your wife/girlfriend, your mother. Does she think about her safety: At a bar or public event? Waiting in line? Waiting for a bus or train? Walking down the street? Shopping? At work with the guy(s) that harass her?

      So to answer your question: My daughter would gladly trade some limits on how she can express herself if it limits the rape threats, death threats, hateful comments she receives.

      Women: comments please?
      RLH

    3. Re:So the few (trolls) get to hurt the many? by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Women are always afraid? Of what exactly?

      You do realize that men are - by a factor of 4 or 5 - more likely to be murdered than women, right?

      Are you really in fear 24/7? You should probably see a psychologist.

  26. Anita's there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who think a lot of the comments are paranoid conspiracy theory, lets take a look at who's on this council:
    https://about.twitter.com/safe...

    Doing a quick scan, I recognized Anita Sarkeesian (search for "feminist frequency").

    That's definitely a neutral unbiased third party who hasn't made controversial videos and never claimed that disagreement with her opinions were trolling and abuse.

  27. If you're not with us you're against us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The PC thought police, while good intentioned, are MORE THAN HAPPY, *FREQUENTLY* to very harshly label people who disagree or question them, in almost any capacity. They have no problem in having you doxxed, shamed, fired, etc and furthermore, even if it WAS right to harass someone like that, they frequently jump to conclusions or vastly exaggerate. They'll then go on to claim that you're the harasser for defending yourself or 'harassment is bad' in one breath "let's get this asshole fired!!!" in the next.

    The (hardcore) SJW brigade are fucking loonies and many of the moderate ones seem to pretend they don't exist, performing exactly the same bad actions if not worse - but it's ok, they are targeting 'the bad guys'

    There's obviously some nasty trolls online, they say such stupid ridiculous shit, abusive, hateful and mean they throw insults at people often. I used to be kind of* one. However the 'other guys' will lie about you, exaggerate, they'll investigate and 'uncover the actual truth'. While one can be very easily dismissed as a complete idiot saying "dumb cunt woman, you look like a dog" they'll play far smarter and arguably, more evil by suggesting perhaps you were trying to rape her (mentioning her cunt!) you've been stalking (you knew she had a dog!) you threatened violence (what?) etc

    * Some people use black humour or sarcasm, perhaps they stir the pot, it doesn't mean it's an attack. Many of the SJW types don't seem to 'get' old English humour in the slightest.

    People should stop being dicks to one and other online really.
    I nearly posted this with my normal account, I thought I might be skirting the line of being able to be critical without pushing someones buttons, but at any time you don't know if an angry SJW ready to defend the clan is ready to fire up google and ruin your life.

  28. Who fucking cares? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Twitter is a free service. Don't use it if you don't like their policies.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  29. Welcome to yout Twitter SafeSpace by Idisagree · · Score: 1

    Taking a looking at the list of censorship bodies *cough* I mean rights organizations, I'm guessing I wont be able to say anything on twitter that offends anyone about anything at all without being banned!

    Scary days with thought police being deployed under the label of trust and safety.

    I'm actually pretty upset about this move as all dissenting views will be shutout from the new clean and family friendly twitter.

    Honestly the only way to deal with issues is to let everyone have their opinion and you as the user decide who the crazies are, not the twitter stasi patrols

    Heavy days, Heavy days for the Internet's freedoms.

    I guess I'll have to change my username soon too.

  30. Safe zone all over again, not the same by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Some people are too sensitive, so they want to stop other people from saying things that offend them. But instead of dealing with it themselves, they appeal to some authority to fight the “problem” on their behalf. Because not only are they super-sensitive, but they’re also LAZY.

    At a university, we certainly cannot condone physical violence. And patterns of sustained harrassment are also not acceptable. However, college is a place where people need to be CHALLENGED, socially, intellectually, and ideologically. You can no longer live in the little shell that your parents and no-cussing high school used to provide for you. If you REALLY need a break from all the noise, you can go to your doom room and put in some ear plugs.

    Twitter is a different matter. They run a business, and that business requires people to actively engage in sharing of news and information. Trolling minorities can created a disproportionate amount of noise. If we tell the nice people to “go somewhere else,” they will, and that means they stop using twitter. After a while, Twitter devolves into a community of nothing but trolls trolling each other. The trolling continues to escalate to the point that it becomes undeniably illegal, and the whole system is crushed under its own weight. Twitter cannot allow that, along with those of us who find value in that as a communication medium. Sometimes there’s a fine line between “freedom of speech” and “abuse of speech.” We want to trust individuals to make that choice, but there are too damn many people who cannot be trusted with that responsibility that we end up being forced to insitute rules that sadly do restrict some valid messages. This is why we can’t have nice things. A few assholes ruin things for everyone else. And so forth.

    So let’s consider a valid point that would get most people in trouble for saying:

    - Gay men have a substantially increased risk of transmitting STI’s. This is a consequence of the way the body works. Unfortunately, condom use is not taken for granted within the gay community, and there’s a great deal of promiscuity. This puts more gay men at excessive risk of disease, along with many people in the rest of the population. The solution is for gay men to adopt condoms and monogamy as standards and to shame those who do not. And the best way the rest of us can facilitate monogamy among gay men is to strongly encourage gay marriage. This requires that everyone grow up and recognize homosexual relationships as being as valid as any other. Being in a gay relationship does not make you a sinful person, opening the door for “worse" behavior. Gay men need to have standards, and other people should stop getting in the way of them adopting standards. Sexual relationships are both a right and a responsibility.

    Now, if I were to blog about this, I’d get a lot of shit for what I just said:

    - The right would tell me that I’m terrible for encouraging sinful homosexual behavior.
    - The left would tell me that I’m terrible for singling out gay men and discouraging them from certain irresponsible behaviors.

    It seems like if you want to make a point based on math and science (the disease transmission rates among gay men are quite clear), everybody will hate you for saying something counter to their political agenda. What we have is one group handing down rules from ancient literature and another group saying that people should be allowed to act however they want without considering the consequences.

  31. It's fucking nothing. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure this is about the seventh time in as many months that Twitter has announced they're making Big Changes in the way deal with trolling, with the help of a giant list of Concerned Parties that always includes Feminist Frequency.

    I am also pretty sure that such announcements will be a regular occurrence for as long as they appear to have some effect on investor confidence.

  32. Re:R O T F L M A O @ ALL /. TROLLS! apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. We all laugh at the Slashdot trolls such as APK!

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  33. Re:Coren22's "APKolypse" #2/2... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    The quote was meant to be Satya Nadella about you, not you about Satya. I assume that AC meant it as a joke.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  34. Re:"platform for users to express themselves freel by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

    Leftist = rightist = centrist = totalitarian. That old terminology is obsolete.

    In this case, you could probably substitute "establishment" or "nomenklatura" in place of "left".

  35. Re:What a bunch of stupid fucks... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    How dare you not post a trigger warning before suggesting Roosh's mom is a good cook

    TBH, the rice krispy squares sucked.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  36. This is not fighting trolls.... by CTU · · Score: 1

    They only wanted to give the biggest trolls more power....heck nobody trolls like that lying manipulative Anita Sarkeesian