Slashdot Mirror


Indonesia Moves To Ban Same-Sex Emojis On Messaging Apps (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Indonesian government has this week demanded that instant messaging apps available in the country remove all same-sex emoticons from their platforms, or face heavy sanctions. While homosexuality is not illegal in the country, it remains a controversial issue in the Muslim-dominated country. Now in the latest effort to crackdown on gay rights, Indonesian authorities want to ban emojis, stickers and emoticons which depict same-sex couples, the rainbow flag, and any symbol that symbolises the lesbian, bay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Apps that have been targeted by the demands include the popular Asian messaging app LINE, Whatsapp, Facebook and Twitter. The Indonesian Communication and Information Ministry added that a particular concern was that children would find the bright coloured stickers appealing.

41 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. But they're not white, so it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's OK for non-whites to be homophobic.

    SJWs have lower standards for non-whites, especially if the homophobes are Islamic - because the SJWs are awfully quiet when Islamic "culture" says EXECUTING gays is OK.

    Hell, if you're Islamic you can be misogynistic, too.

    1. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).

      Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap. As for the SJWs, they're so full of it that the only people listening to them are other SJW wannabes.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People put way too much credence on what they read on the Internet. And reading it from "multiple sources" means nothing either, because all those "sources" just copy each other.

    3. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).

      Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap. As for the SJWs, they're so full of it that the only people listening to them are other SJW wannabes.

      BULLSHIT.

      Again:

      Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin.

      BULLSHIT

      Who was killed over Piss Christ?

      NO ONE.

      Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?

      Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons?

      Thank you so very much for demonstrating my point about SJWs having lower standards for non-white Islamic mores.

      You fucking USELESS idiot.

    4. Re: But they're not white, so it's OK by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One could argue that the extremists are those who insist on dragging paedoterrorists, er... I mean SJW into every sodding thread regardless of it's relevance.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a *huge* difference between...

      * some overheated and breathless clickbait that stretches the ideological-but-otherwise-mundane true story well beyond credibility (e.g. the example you posted), and...

      * actual, no-shit instances of overt and government-sanctioned discrimination (e.g. TFA).

      So, please, knock off the false equivalency; it serves no beneficial purpose, and actually masks the fact that there are some no-shit barbarians out in the world, some of whom run whole governments.

      Let me put it this way - geography aside, would you rather live in a nation generally run by Judeo-Christian values (e.g. US), or Islamic ones (e.g. Saudi Arabia)?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      BULLSHIT

      Who was killed over Piss Christ?

      NO ONE.

      Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?

      Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons?

      Insults removed, but the salient point really should left intact for emphasis, as it is quite valid.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BULLSHIT

      Who was killed over Piss Christ?

      NO ONE.

      Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?

      Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons?

      Insults removed, but the salient point really should left intact for emphasis, as it is quite valid.

      Who would try to create a moral equivalence between Christian fundamentalists who merely say you're going to hell but still pray for you, and Muslim extremists who actually try to send you there?

      There's just no equivalence. One thinks you're wrong, the other actually tries to and often does kill. Literally, there's no equivalence. And anyone who tries to create a moral equivalence between Christian fundamentalists and Islamic extremists is at best intellectually suspect - at best.

      And that's just a nice way of saying "idiot".

      So IMO what you called insults - while strongly worded - were actually accurate.

    8. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would also add on to that:

      Mohammed would be proud of Muslim extremists
      Jesus would condemn Christian extremists

      Jesus taught that you should love those who are different
      Mohammed was a warlord who practiced slavery

      It is hard to believe that Islam stems from Christianity, they are opposites in so many ways.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    9. Re: But they're not white, so it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SJW is mainly a straw man.
      Yes, there are people who are completely bonkers, but they are so few that I am more inclined at thinking it is the people that misuses SJW for everyone they don't like that are the bigger problem.

    10. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 3, Informative

      The common thread is that they both perverted Judaism by turning it into a proselytizing religion.

    11. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      You might want to read the final chapter in the bible - the apocalypse. Doesn't sound all that full of loving-kindness. Also, Paul told early christian slaves that if their master would not grant them freedom, they should be content to be slaves. And this practice continued for almost 2 millennia. Or have you forgotten how runaway slaves were treated? And how they were "recruited" in the first place?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Christianity had slavery for longer than the muslim religion has existed, so it would take a few more centuries for muslims to catch up, even though the majority of muslims don't believe in slavery. And lest you forget, the US resisted attempts by other countries, such as England, to abolish slavery.

      Paul condoned slavery - all it would have taken was for Jesus to say "Hey people, thou can't own other people." But no, that wasn't even on the radar, even though the practice was so wide-spread that it would have been impossible to ignore.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Informative

      So the bill literally said "kill gays" or some variation thereof, right?

      Oh, wait - it most likely didn't.

      Ohh yes it does. It also called for anyone to do the same if the state refuses to enforce the law for 1 year. The actual text:

      a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.

      b) Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God’s just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

      c) No person shall distribute, perform, or transmit sodomistic propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the age of majority. Sodomistic propaganda is defined as anything aimed at creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other than between a man and a woman. Every offender shall be fined $1 million per occurrence, and/or imprisoned up to 10 years, and/or expelled from the boundaries of the state of California for up to life.

      d) No person shall serve in any public office, nor serve in public employment, nor enjoy any public benefit, who is a sodomite or who espouses sodomistic propaganda or who belongs to any group that does.

      e) This law is effective immediately and shall not be rendered ineffective nor invalidated by any court, state or federal, until heard by a quorum of the Supreme Court of California consisting only of judges who are neither sodomites nor subject to disqualification hereunder.

      f) The state has an affirmative duty to defend and enforce this law as written, and every member of the public has standing to seek its enforcement and obtain reimbursement for all costs and attorney’s fees in so doing, and further, should the state persist in inaction over 1 year after due notice, the general public is empowered and deputized to execute all the provisions hereunder extra-judicially, immune from any charge and indemnified by the state against any and all liability.

      g) This law shall be known as “The Sodomite Suppression Act” and be numbered as section 39 in Title 3 of the Penal Code, pertaining to offences [sic] against the sovereignty of the state. The text shall be prominently posted in every public school classroom. All laws in conflict with this law are to that extent invalid.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    14. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with...

      Oh bullshit. Anyone who isn't a Christian decries this crap all the time. And then, in response, the Christian conservatives all bitch and complain about how Christians are being "persecuted" for wanting to "exercise their freedom of religion". It's even an issue on the GOP side with the Presidential election.

      Did you somehow sleep through the media flap when that fat, ugly woman in Kentucky on her 4th marriage refused to sign marriage licenses for homosexuals?

      Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap

      That's incorrect. Pew research has conducted polls showing that majorities of regular, everyday Muslims believe in policies like those.

      The thing we have going for us here in "Christian countries" (the West) is that 1) much of Christianity has gotten away from the Medieval, violent stuff thanks to the Enlightenment (unfortunately, it seems that parts of America are slow to catch up; all the craziest and most extreme Christians are here in the US), and 2) the native-born occupants of Western nations are (thankfully) becoming less and less religious, and more secular. However, the same is not true in Islamic countries: everyone there is Islamic, there is no growing agnostic or atheist movement, and Islam never went through the Enlightenment.

    15. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      What about Christian fundamentalists who do kill? Terrorists or just misguided? There's an equivalence when the mainstream of both religions is against terrorism, except that with Christians there is acknowledgement that the violent acts are just some fringe wackso, but with Muslims there's so much propaganda out there that eveyr Muslim is a potential terrorist.

    16. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hate to break this to you, but that's a ballot initiative, and not a bill.

      Anybody with $200 and a paltry number of signatures can introduce a ballot initiative.

      It's not a legislative action (that is, a bill), as you falsely stated in the beginning.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    17. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      There are more references to violence in the Old Testamant than in the Koran. I think Mohammed would not be proud of the extremists when they act contrary to what he actually said. The most common theme in the Koran is mercy. The caliphates allowed Christians and Jews to live in their lands, albeit with extra taxes. Remember that Christians during ante-bellum South defended the most brutal form of slavery using the Bible, probably the biggest religious schism in America came from protestant churches dividing over the issue of slavery.

    18. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      As I pointed out elsewhere, some places abolished slavery before christianity even existed, and other non-christian societies banned the practice before the US civil war, while many of the "good white christians" of the united states fought to support it. Even Thomas Jefferson owned over 600 slaves.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    19. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Because people like you sure as shit aren't going to do it. You're too busy whining about your lack of taxpayer-funded free-fuck pills.

      Really? Why in the world would women like myself ever need "fuck pills", free or otherwise? Just the thought is ludicrous. And I've sat through too many baptist sermons preaching about how god hates gays, lesbians, and transsexuals. Fundamentalist Christian churches are the problem, not the solution. Good people don't need religion to force them to do right.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    20. Re:But they're not white, so it's OK by RogerWilco · · Score: 2

      The original poster could have been more polite.

      I will still try to answer the point.

      It might not happen in your neighbourhood today, but Christianity and various other religions have been used to justify bloodshed and other atrocities. Sometimes quite recent and sometimes not that far away.

      Witch hunts might no longer happen where you live, but there are large parts of the world where they still do.
      Prosecution of gays happens in a lot of places in the world based on supposed Christian values and was the norm in most of the Western World fifty years ago.
      For recent examples of people claiming to have killed others for religious reasons, not Islamic, go google, Barend Strydom, Ami Popper, Wade Michael Page, the IRA, UDA/UFF. I could probably find more, but that's what an initial google turned up.

      I would agree with the argument that at the moment, the Islamic inspired religious fundamentalists seem the most numerous, violent and well funded. I primarily blame the recent oil weath in the Middle East for that, especially the Saudi-Arabia and Iran. The agenda of a very few, but suddenly very rich, religious fundamentalist people has shaped the region and the world tremendously over the past half century. You will find much woman wearing a headscarf in images from the sixties and seventies, let alone the full black dress and scarf you commonly see in the Middle East today. I've seen pictures of women in miniskirt in Kabul. Look at the funeral images of Nasser in Egypt in 1970.

      The Middle East is a mess, but the former Ottoman Empire, and the borders drawn by colonial powers Britain and France after that have a lot to do with it, at least in Israel/Palestina/Iraq/Syria/Turkey/Libya/Pakistan/Lebanon. I put the primary blame on the Saudi's though for exporting and funding their ideas in the region over the past decades. I don't think Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS or the Taliban would exist without that, certainly not in their present form.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  2. The deep insecurity of Islam by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    I am not talking about Muslims in general, because generalizations are impossible, but Islam itself is founded on some deep insecurities of men.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:The deep insecurity of Islam by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bah ... if there's a god of the universe he made it with cool shit like gravity waves and other things we can understand using things like relativity, filled it with vast and complex things to amaze and delight us, and gave us the capacity to investigate and understand it, and ponder our own place in it.

      That god is sitting around going "what the fuck are the little squishy ones on that little fucking rock doing ?"

      It's the fucking humans which are the whiny little petulant assholes who can't get over our own bullshit and fantasies about shit like this.

      Narrow minded people need to imagine a narrow minded god.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:The deep insecurity of Islam by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem I have with the christian god is that he is inconsistent. Not only in his actions, that's normal with megalomaniac lunatics. No, in his psychological makeup.

      He's insecure and jealous. Not my idea, his own manual says so. Ok. He's got the personality of an opera diva and wants constant worship from everyone. And anyone not worshiping him needs to be converted or sent on a one-way trip to hell. Because he wants a bigger audience. So far, so sensible. Typical egotist with a megalomaniac streak, which is not uncommon with people who not only get lifted on pedestals by their peers but also have a lot of power.

      And then he does everything to make himself obsolete. Take this universe. Time and again I get to hear how this is a proof for god because it's so "perfectly tuned". Aside of being impossible to observe were it any other way (because we didn't exist then), wouldn't a god that wants groveling and worship ensure that we KNOW it's his doing and ONLY his doing, that keeps us alive? He's all powerful, and if only half the stories in his ad brochure are true he also has no problem observing any physical limitations or pesky little things like conservation of energy. It would be trivial for him to ensure we KNOW he's there.

      But instead he hides and gives us every reason to not believe in his existence because it is possible to explain this universe, from its creation to its current state, without there ever being some kind of supernatural entity required.

      How does this get together with that diva personality?

      Sorry, christians, your god makes no sense. Get a more sensible one that doesn't look like something Michael Bay would want to make a movie of (seriously, he's big with the special effects in his ad publication but poor with dialogue and sensible content... much like a Bay movie) and we can talk.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:The deep insecurity of Islam by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > He's insecure and jealous. Not my idea, his own manual says so.

      His/Her manual also says in Jer 8:8:

      'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?

      Blaming God because (some) Men distort the truth is tossing the baby out with the bathwater. i.e. Sacrifices were never commanded (Jer 7:22)

      For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices:

      Jesus clarified the spiritual immaturity & stupidity of Judaism when he quotes Hosea 6:6

      But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."

      > But instead he hides

      If everyone knew God existed it wouldn't change a single thing. Why? Because you're forgetting about a little experiment called Earth:

      Free Will

      > because it is possible to explain this universe ... without there ever being some kind of supernatural entity required.

      And the Laws of Physics just "magically" appeared one day?? Or are you saying they have always existed ??

      The first law of Thermodynamics tells us:

      Energy can not be created nor destroyed.

      Ergo, the universe has always existed, which implies the Laws of Physics have always existed.

      Either way it takes faith to believe in an Eternal Universe or Eternal God. Infinity is curiouser and curiouser that way.

      What you are missing is that, at the end of the day, who cares where your faith is placed?? What DOES matter is your _actions_ towards others. There is a reason ALL the major religions teach The Golden Rule. Look, ALL Religions bibles, holy works, and theology can be summarized in 2 words:

      Love Unconditionally

      THAT'S the point of pure Spirituality, not the corrupted versions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam selling Heaven Insurance.

  3. Re:Religion by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the start of the slippery slope toward total barbarism

    I'd say it's a good thing.

    You did mean that they'll eventually ban all emojis, right?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Re:Curious by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm... 72 virgins... a 90s LAN party?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Re:Republitards? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Actually, they should get along pretty well.

    Dawkins help us if they ever find out how much they have in common and stop shooting each other.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. This just in by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Religious nutjobs create law without any connection to reality. Film at 11.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:And... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Hmmm ... let's see ... wants to define what others can do based on their own religion ... are 100% convinced of their right to do so ... wish to impose own standards of decency/morality on the rest of the world whether the rest of the world likes it or not ... thinks the rest of the world needs to let them do as they please while refusing to respect other beliefs ... wants their religion taught in school and to supersede science and facts ... firmly think god is personally on their side and can do no wrong.

    It's hard to see how they're that much different.

    Of course, they'll claim it's entirely different, because they're the True Believers and everyone else is wrong. And in the process will prove the point through a level of irony neither can appreciate.

    Why, you'd think anybody who values freedom, free speech, liberty, and the right of self determination would immediately start sending out as many homojis as they could find to defend such censorship and imposition of lack of freedom on the world.

    (And I hereby grant homojis to the world to use freely and without license ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  8. Wow by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article is about yet another Muslim country implementing homophobic laws, and half of the comments are already immediately teeing off on Christianity without even a nod to the article itself. Nothing constructive or insightful . . . just an attempt to deflect and scream "but the other team is even worse!" Fuck you . . . you're not helping.

    1. Re:Wow by halivar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not like "yarg, teh batshit crazy Muslims" is any different from "yarg, teh batshit crazy Christians".

      I know right? Refusing to bake a gay wedding cake is literally and exactly like dragging them into the street and stoning them to death. It is, as you say, "the exact same fucking thing."

    2. Re:Wow by ilsaloving · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that religious nutjobs will take your inch and try to steal a mile. They will do their damndest to shove their nose in your business, and will use any means to do so, at every possible opportunity, even if it's illegal. I mean, look at what's happening in the US right this moment.

      Michigan just banned sodomy despite the fact that have a whackton of real and devastating problems that are costing people their lives.

      Republicans are actively waging a war against women, cause vaginas are skeery. They went so far as to produce fraudulent footage of planned parenthood just so they could open an investigation. It has been demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt, repeatedly, that they they lied and cheated in order to accomplish what they wanted, and yet somehow people are letting them.

      So what is the result? Women are now dying because of various medical issues that would have been trivially prevented by Planned Parenthood, because they either didn't have, or didn't know they had, options.

      So yeah, your idea of freedom is great in an ideal world. So is Communism. We don't live in an ideal world.

      At least fanatic Muslims are honest about wanting to murder you. Christian fanatics prefer to murder you by indirect means so that they can pretend that they are the good guys.

    3. Re:Wow by halivar · · Score: 2

      Michigan just banned sodomy despite the fact that have a whackton of real and devastating problems that are costing people their lives.

      This is false.

      They went so far as to produce fraudulent footage of planned parenthood just so they could open an investigation.

      This is false. People said inconvenient things for PP.

      It has been demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt, repeatedly, that they they lied and cheated in order to accomplish what they wanted

      This is true! Also, unclear on the concept of an undercover expose (with the accent mark; thanks for being there when I need you, Unicode).

      Women are now dying because of various medical issues that would have been trivially prevented by Planned Parenthood, because they either didn't have, or didn't know they had, options.

      You could mean two things with this, and both things are false. First, if you're referring to the much ballyhoo'd mammograms, it would be helpful here to mention that PP doesn't perform them anyway, and never has. Second, if you're referring to women somehow not being aware of the fact that abortions exist, and need to be counselled on it's existence, then that simply stretches credulity.

  9. Re:Curious by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The claim is men that martyr themselves get 72 virgins when they die.

    I've never understood the appeal for this. I mean, it's the afterlife. I would assume that STD's are no longer an issue. I would think that two ridiculously attractive whores would be preferable.

    Or maybe we've really misunderstood the true meaning of this. Perhaps Islam is really opposed to martyrdom. It could be such a bad thing in Islam that if you do so, you will nagged for all eternity by 72 women with whom you can never have sex.

    What do the women get when they martyr themselves?

    They get to be one of the 72 women who nag some stupid man to insanity for all of time. Hell, there's 72 of them and not an AK47 in site. They can stone him to death over and over.

  10. Re:And... by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Claim your dog is telling you the truth of the universe and how life should be run, they lock you up in a mental institution. Claim your "god" is doing the same thing and get tax exempt status...

  11. Re:And... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

    Here's a fun question: Would you rather live in a society dominated by Judeo-Christian values, or Islamic ones?

    But I guess false equivalency is more comforting, no?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  12. wow by pghmike4 · · Score: 2

    They're worried children will turn gay because they like rainbows? I'm in awe.

  13. Re:There are Same Sex Emoticons? by naris · · Score: 2

    Whatever happened to live and let live?

    That is not a thing in fundamentalist religious nations.

  14. What a bunch of regressive douchebags! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Wow, it's 2016 and we're still worried about what the sky wizard thinks about where penises are or are not going. Really, this is what this is about. Let's also consider this a country whose women for the most part (97.5%) get to enjoy the practice of getting their clitorises cut off. Let that fact detonate in your brain.

    Fuck these asshats and their shitty religious ideas.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  15. Re:And... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Sanity is defined by the norm. Since a large proportion of the human population believes in some kind of god, it's considered normal and sane. Because few people believe in aliens or unicorns, people who do are considered to have some kind of problem or flaw.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC