Slashdot Mirror
Indonesia Moves To Ban Same-Sex Emojis On Messaging Apps (thestack.com)
An anonymous reader writes: The Indonesian government has this week demanded that instant messaging apps available in the country remove all same-sex emoticons from their platforms, or face heavy sanctions. While homosexuality is not illegal in the country, it remains a controversial issue in the Muslim-dominated country. Now in the latest effort to crackdown on gay rights, Indonesian authorities want to ban emojis, stickers and emoticons which depict same-sex couples, the rainbow flag, and any symbol that symbolises the lesbian, bay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Apps that have been targeted by the demands include the popular Asian messaging app LINE, Whatsapp, Facebook and Twitter. The Indonesian Communication and Information Ministry added that a particular concern was that children would find the bright coloured stickers appealing.
I'd say it's a good thing.
You did mean that they'll eventually ban all emojis, right?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).
Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap. As for the SJWs, they're so full of it that the only people listening to them are other SJW wannabes.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Hmm... 72 virgins... a 90s LAN party?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
People put way too much credence on what they read on the Internet. And reading it from "multiple sources" means nothing either, because all those "sources" just copy each other.
This article is about yet another Muslim country implementing homophobic laws, and half of the comments are already immediately teeing off on Christianity without even a nod to the article itself. Nothing constructive or insightful . . . just an attempt to deflect and scream "but the other team is even worse!" Fuck you . . . you're not helping.
The claim is men that martyr themselves get 72 virgins when they die.
I've never understood the appeal for this. I mean, it's the afterlife. I would assume that STD's are no longer an issue. I would think that two ridiculously attractive whores would be preferable.
Or maybe we've really misunderstood the true meaning of this. Perhaps Islam is really opposed to martyrdom. It could be such a bad thing in Islam that if you do so, you will nagged for all eternity by 72 women with whom you can never have sex.
What do the women get when they martyr themselves?
They get to be one of the 72 women who nag some stupid man to insanity for all of time. Hell, there's 72 of them and not an AK47 in site. They can stone him to death over and over.
Bah ... if there's a god of the universe he made it with cool shit like gravity waves and other things we can understand using things like relativity, filled it with vast and complex things to amaze and delight us, and gave us the capacity to investigate and understand it, and ponder our own place in it.
That god is sitting around going "what the fuck are the little squishy ones on that little fucking rock doing ?"
It's the fucking humans which are the whiny little petulant assholes who can't get over our own bullshit and fantasies about shit like this.
Narrow minded people need to imagine a narrow minded god.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).
Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap. As for the SJWs, they're so full of it that the only people listening to them are other SJW wannabes.
BULLSHIT.
Again:
Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin.
BULLSHIT
Who was killed over Piss Christ?
NO ONE.
Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?
Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons?
Thank you so very much for demonstrating my point about SJWs having lower standards for non-white Islamic mores.
You fucking USELESS idiot.
Claim your dog is telling you the truth of the universe and how life should be run, they lock you up in a mental institution. Claim your "god" is doing the same thing and get tax exempt status...
One could argue that the extremists are those who insist on dragging paedoterrorists, er... I mean SJW into every sodding thread regardless of it's relevance.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
BULLSHIT
Who was killed over Piss Christ?
NO ONE.
Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?
Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons?
Insults removed, but the salient point really should left intact for emphasis, as it is quite valid.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
I would also add on to that:
Mohammed would be proud of Muslim extremists
Jesus would condemn Christian extremists
Jesus taught that you should love those who are different
Mohammed was a warlord who practiced slavery
It is hard to believe that Islam stems from Christianity, they are opposites in so many ways.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
SJW is mainly a straw man.
Yes, there are people who are completely bonkers, but they are so few that I am more inclined at thinking it is the people that misuses SJW for everyone they don't like that are the bigger problem.
The problem I have with the christian god is that he is inconsistent. Not only in his actions, that's normal with megalomaniac lunatics. No, in his psychological makeup.
He's insecure and jealous. Not my idea, his own manual says so. Ok. He's got the personality of an opera diva and wants constant worship from everyone. And anyone not worshiping him needs to be converted or sent on a one-way trip to hell. Because he wants a bigger audience. So far, so sensible. Typical egotist with a megalomaniac streak, which is not uncommon with people who not only get lifted on pedestals by their peers but also have a lot of power.
And then he does everything to make himself obsolete. Take this universe. Time and again I get to hear how this is a proof for god because it's so "perfectly tuned". Aside of being impossible to observe were it any other way (because we didn't exist then), wouldn't a god that wants groveling and worship ensure that we KNOW it's his doing and ONLY his doing, that keeps us alive? He's all powerful, and if only half the stories in his ad brochure are true he also has no problem observing any physical limitations or pesky little things like conservation of energy. It would be trivial for him to ensure we KNOW he's there.
But instead he hides and gives us every reason to not believe in his existence because it is possible to explain this universe, from its creation to its current state, without there ever being some kind of supernatural entity required.
How does this get together with that diva personality?
Sorry, christians, your god makes no sense. Get a more sensible one that doesn't look like something Michael Bay would want to make a movie of (seriously, he's big with the special effects in his ad publication but poor with dialogue and sensible content... much like a Bay movie) and we can talk.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
The common thread is that they both perverted Judaism by turning it into a proselytizing religion.
> He's insecure and jealous. Not my idea, his own manual says so.
His/Her manual also says in Jer 8:8:
Blaming God because (some) Men distort the truth is tossing the baby out with the bathwater. i.e. Sacrifices were never commanded (Jer 7:22)
Jesus clarified the spiritual immaturity & stupidity of Judaism when he quotes Hosea 6:6
> But instead he hides
If everyone knew God existed it wouldn't change a single thing. Why? Because you're forgetting about a little experiment called Earth:
Free Will
> because it is possible to explain this universe ... without there ever being some kind of supernatural entity required.
And the Laws of Physics just "magically" appeared one day?? Or are you saying they have always existed ??
The first law of Thermodynamics tells us:
Ergo, the universe has always existed, which implies the Laws of Physics have always existed.
Either way it takes faith to believe in an Eternal Universe or Eternal God. Infinity is curiouser and curiouser that way.
What you are missing is that, at the end of the day, who cares where your faith is placed?? What DOES matter is your _actions_ towards others. There is a reason ALL the major religions teach The Golden Rule. Look, ALL Religions bibles, holy works, and theology can be summarized in 2 words:
Love Unconditionally
THAT'S the point of pure Spirituality, not the corrupted versions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam selling Heaven Insurance.
So the bill literally said "kill gays" or some variation thereof, right?
Oh, wait - it most likely didn't.
Ohh yes it does. It also called for anyone to do the same if the state refuses to enforce the law for 1 year. The actual text:
a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.
b) Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God’s just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.
c) No person shall distribute, perform, or transmit sodomistic propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the age of majority. Sodomistic propaganda is defined as anything aimed at creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other than between a man and a woman. Every offender shall be fined $1 million per occurrence, and/or imprisoned up to 10 years, and/or expelled from the boundaries of the state of California for up to life.
d) No person shall serve in any public office, nor serve in public employment, nor enjoy any public benefit, who is a sodomite or who espouses sodomistic propaganda or who belongs to any group that does.
e) This law is effective immediately and shall not be rendered ineffective nor invalidated by any court, state or federal, until heard by a quorum of the Supreme Court of California consisting only of judges who are neither sodomites nor subject to disqualification hereunder.
f) The state has an affirmative duty to defend and enforce this law as written, and every member of the public has standing to seek its enforcement and obtain reimbursement for all costs and attorney’s fees in so doing, and further, should the state persist in inaction over 1 year after due notice, the general public is empowered and deputized to execute all the provisions hereunder extra-judicially, immune from any charge and indemnified by the state against any and all liability.
g) This law shall be known as “The Sodomite Suppression Act” and be numbered as section 39 in Title 3 of the Penal Code, pertaining to offences [sic] against the sovereignty of the state. The text shall be prominently posted in every public school classroom. All laws in conflict with this law are to that extent invalid.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Hate to break this to you, but that's a ballot initiative, and not a bill.
Anybody with $200 and a paltry number of signatures can introduce a ballot initiative.
It's not a legislative action (that is, a bill), as you falsely stated in the beginning.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?