Slashdot Mirror


Preserving Cuba's Classic Cars (hackaday.com)

szczys writes: Cuba is a wonderland of classic cars. These aren't sitting in showroom-like garages of wealthy collectors, they're on the road — about 60,000 of them. Most of these cards are 55-70 years old and it's amazing how people are keeping these automobiles running. After ties between Cuba and the United States were cut off in the 1960's, vehicles were brought in from the Eastern Bloc and the diesel engines from many of these ended up being retrofit into the American cars. But there are still many holdouts who have made their gas-burning vehicles more efficient rather than convert to the alternative fuel.

83 comments

  1. first in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are real hackers.

  2. In Communist Cuba... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Communist Cuba classic cars smoke you!

  3. Cuban Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been to Cuba many times,
    It's true! they are nice and look good from the outside...
    If you open the hood of that 1950 Chevrolet, you will find a Dawoo, Suzuki or any other engine that they can fit in the body.
    It is still amazing!

    1. Re:Cuban Cars by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      And based on my not so classic American car ('79 ford Granada), you can fit pretty much any engine under there.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Cuban Cars by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1

      The article mentions diesels from Eastern Bloc countries but a taxi I once took in Holguin was a 1952 Pontiac with a 40hp diesel engine from a Korean tractor. Top speed was barely about 30mph due to the gearing. The smell... the smell...

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    3. Re:Cuban Cars by KGIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This... There might be a tick in the aficionado market and there might be some historical or art value. If you're going to go to Cuba to buy the cars dirt cheap and bring them back like they're collector pieces, you will be disappointed. I *am* an automotive enthusiast and I have *been* to Cuba. You will not just find engines swapped, you will find the seats aren't the right model, the rims aren't correct, the body panels may not even be original (and probably aren't in many cases).

      They've done a great job keeping these vehicles running. They have not kept them pristine. I've mentioned this a few times now because every time the subject of Cuba comes up, someone seems to say, "I bet those cars are worth a fortune." They might be - if you get in very quick and grab some of the better ones. Mostly, they'll have some historical significance and some art significance. They will be unlikely to retain that value once the novelty wears off and they realize that they're not something you can just drive down to VIP and get a lube and oil job.

      Many of them do not look good from the outside. It's an island. It's an island in the ocean. The ocean has salt water. There's salt in the air. They've been in this salt air for a very long time, without proper care, and getting a whole lot of wear and tear. They are not going to be a reliable vehicle that the collectors can take to shows and show off. At best, they'll be trailer queens. That Mercury has a Lada engine, brakes from a Dodge, Ford seats, a bumper from a bus of unknown origin, four wheels from varied OEMs, and the body is rusting out under that paint.

      That they run at all is a miracle and a testimony to the skills of the Cuban mechanics. They might have some novelty value but that will wear thin very quickly. Collectors aren't going to have a big demand for them - though there might be a few that are worth a small amount for parts that are otherwise rare. They might have some art or historical value but those will probably dwindle quickly - probably not a sound long-term investment. If you're going to do anything, get a parts list and bring someone with you and hit up their junk yards and ship back parts by the ton in crates - there will be the only real money making possibility.

      If you buy a car from Cuba and you plan to actually use it, show it, or keep it in running condition then you're going to need to bring back the Cuban mechanic with you. Make suitable arrangements for their visa, family, and means of livelihood unless you plan on adopting the whole family. This is *not* a task I'd recommend anyone undertake unless they've a very compelling reason. Trying to invest in these will almost certainly result in a financial loss unless you're the first one on the scene and able to get the pick of the litter and somehow prove it was one of Fidel's, Raul's, or Batista's personal car. If you buy it to use it, it's going to break your heart. If you buy it to sell it, it's going to break your wallet.

      Other than that, they're kind of cool. But it's important to note, do not invest! We've had a dozen threads lately and I bet this has come up in all of them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Cuban Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "not so classic"... Is that your way of saying "piece of shit"? LOL

    5. Re:Cuban Cars by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      When trade restrictions are finally fully lifted, either crated small blocks will be sent in bulk, or these cars will be shipped here to be fully restored.

      Either way, profit!

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:Cuban Cars by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Putting an LS1 in a Granada isn't going to do anyone any good.

      But a 351? Heck yeah. And the Granada is a classic, just not of the genre you would ordinarily associate with pride of ownership. Congrats on keeping it running, tho. I can't fathom why, but I covet a '65 Nova, not even the SS necessary...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:Cuban Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... there might be some historical or art value.

      Completely off the subject, who owns the car if one of the refugee families (or an insurance company with stacks of microfiched records) sees a car come back and presents the United States Government with a Batista-Era title or Force Majeure claim? "That they run at all is a miracle" absolutely. I would think that a couple of running, most heavily modified (and subsequently cheapest) vehicles, documented with the list of parts replaced, and from what vehicles/implements/appliances when known, would make an interesting exhibit for the Smithsonian, a Petersen automotive museum, etc. If you were trying to keep one running as an individual, it would be best to have some serious automotive *and* machine shop experience. Do not expect a daily driver. Do not expect it to pull under its own power.

    8. Re:Cuban Cars by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figure there's some historical interest, if any, and maybe some art value - I doubt it will be high. I'm not sure, for instance, if the Smithsonian would want one? I might expect to find some sort of Cuban history museum might have one. I just don't see much of a collector market. But...

      That said, I'd consider buying one - against my better judgment. It would not be an investment so much as a curio and would go against my current practices. I own *no* "trailer queens." I have a lot of automobiles (I've been collecting and appreciating for a long time) but none of them are really all that expensive or even all that special. They're all special to me (I have very specific models and years) but they're all driven at some point. (I even own a real, fully restored, tow truck.) But, I'd buy one and stick it in the barn and keep it in the condition I got it. I'd probably bring it out and take it for a drive.

      What I'd be most interested in seeing is a museum dedicated exclusively to them but I don't see that as a likely outcome. I'm also not sure how many would frequent it or how easily it will be to acquire them before they're destroyed. (I imagine they'll simply stop working on them as they start importing more vehicles.) From my observations, they need near constant attention and that *might* change if there's a period of time. It was not uncommon to see them broken down and they often were being worked on. I do wonder what an influx of genuine OEM or 3rd party parts will do?

      NPR just told me that they're going to allow 10 flights per day from the US to Cuba. They did not give a start date.

      Now... I am an aficionado, I am not a lawyer. I do believe that they'll not be returning any automobiles to former owners under any circumstances. I imagine that adverse possession laws would apply (or something similar) and that the old government, thus any officiation, would be considered invalid. It would be a diplomatic and political nightmare.

      I'm also not sure that they can document where all the parts came from. You might, with some work, be able to take it apart and find out which models (and maybe years) the parts came from but I doubt you could get much further than that. Add to that, some parts have been completely re-manufactured.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:Cuban Cars by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I meant less classic due to age (79 vs 50s or 60s).

      I don't have it anymore, I needed a part that was going to take too long to get (a random hose for the power stearing), overall it treated me really well though. It was super low mileage (old lady death car under 200k when I sold it), and the AC didn't work, but I was never sidelined by it, I did all the preventative maintenance though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  4. Planned obsolescence by NotInHere · · Score: 1

    You don't know how the car industry works, do you? The car lobby is working hard that the next trade treaty cuba makes with any foreign country except perhaps venezuela will contain provisions for enhanced car safety and emmision values. And all those cars will have to be dumped, and new ones bought, that only work for five years each.

    1. Re:Planned obsolescence by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Modern cars will last as long as these did. I say "did" rather than "have" because even as TFA notes, if you were to look under the hood you probably wouldn't even find original parts in them anymore. That is, other than the body, these practically are no longer the same cars that they once were in the 50's.

      The reason why modern cars don't seem to last as long in first world countries is because once they break down to a certain point, the labor cost is so expensive that it's cheaper to just get a new car. However in Cuba, the labor price is typically lower while at the same time it's harder to get a hold of new stuff, which means reusing stuff becomes more practical than just making a new one. Like for example, TFA mentions repurposing old dryer motors for key cutting machines.

      It's somewhat hard to think that in the 50's, Cuba was a somewhat wealthy country. That is until glorious revolution happened, and communism made everybody equally poor.

    2. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that communism didn't make everybody equally poor.

      The communist 1% did quite well for themselves.

    3. Re:Planned obsolescence by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat hard to think that in the 50's, Cuba was a somewhat wealthy country. That is until glorious revolution happened, and communism made everybody equally poor.

      A blockade by their biggest trading partner also had a little something to do with it.

      Cuba will remain a communist country, but just watch what happens to their economy once relations with the US are normalized.

      The red-scare, commie under every bed political diaper-wetting just doesn't have the same sway over US policy any more.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Planned obsolescence by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Communism, or embargoes?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "That is until glorious revolution happened, and communism made everybody equally poor." Everyone hate the commies... until they need something from the local fucking Walmart.

    6. Re:Planned obsolescence by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A blockade (keeping other people out) isn't the same as an embargo (not trading yourself). Cuba has been free to trade with the other 195 countries in the world. With the cost of shipping from the other side of the world (say, China) extremely low, there is virtually no difference between them trading with the U.S. and trading with the rest of the world. Not only that, but anything made specifically in the U.S. can get to Cuba by just transhipping it via another country. The biggest impact of the embargo has been Cuban access to U.S. financial markets, for which there are many other alternatives out there.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat hard to think that in the 50's, Cuba was a somewhat wealthy country. That is until glorious revolution happened, and communism made everybody equally poor.

      Yeah, no poverty in Cuba back then, right?

      The fact is, before the revolution, Cuba was a US plantation, growing sugar and tobacco, with estates and casinos for the rich. For the poor? Prostitution and destitution.

      But you don't care about that.

    8. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The labor reorganization has a lot more to do with it.

      In the 50's Cuba was a major supplier of sugar. With the work-re-education programs, they took sugar cane workers out of the hard labor conditions to give others a taste. The result was a major increase in sugar cane field damage (improperly cutting the cane weakens the plant). Within a few years, the sugar output plummeted, driving sugar costs up even higher and eventually opening the door for the hijinks in trying to hide high fructose corn syrup's signature flavor.

      The embargo didn't help, but quickly afterwards it didn't matter. Cuba lost its sugar producing power by replacing skilled hard labor with unskilled hard labor to teach the soft population the real value of hard labor.

    9. Re:Planned obsolescence by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Modern cars will last as long as these did. I say "did" rather than "have" because even as TFA notes, if you were to look under the hood you probably wouldn't even find original parts in them anymore. That is, other than the body, these practically are no longer the same cars that they once were in the 50's.

      The reason why modern cars don't seem to last as long in first world countries is because once they break down to a certain point, the labor cost is so expensive that it's cheaper to just get a new car. However in Cuba, the labor price is typically lower while at the same time it's harder to get a hold of new stuff, which means reusing stuff becomes more practical than just making a new one. Like for example, TFA mentions repurposing old dryer motors for key cutting machines.

      Even body parts are pretty much fabricated from rare sheet steel.

      Discovery already has Cuban Chrome which showcases how Cubans have been keeping these old cars running - in fact, there is an auto club where if you meet certain requirements (mostly aesthetic and emissions), you can act as a taxi for foreigners. Else, you can only drive locals - and of course, tourists pay more.

      And any engine will do - they actually show a car running a boat engine because that's all that was available.

      When you see the cars from the 50s in Cuba, they're not like the cars from the 50s in North America - the Cuban cars are pretty much body only - everything else has been replaced or cobbled together with what parts were available. While North American restorations typically keep everything together with original motor and everything. The exceptions would be for the "hot rod" modifications which put in a modern engine and it becomes a new powertrain on an existing chassis.

    10. Re:Planned obsolescence by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The reason why modern cars don't seem to last as long in first world countries is because once they break down to a certain point, the labor cost is so expensive that it's cheaper to just get a new car. However in Cuba, the labor price is typically lower while at the same time it's harder to get a hold of new stuff, which means reusing stuff becomes more practical than just making a new one.

      Of course, they'll all eventually be running aftermarket fuel injection (e.g. Megasquirt) and other electronics because the DRM'd OEM stuff will refuse to work unless replaced by a manufacturer-"authorized" mechanic.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Planned obsolescence by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Yes, Cuba was indeed "somwhat wealthy" in that 99% of the country was poor while the top percent had all the power and wealth. Oh and let's not forget the brutal dictator running the place. But dictatorships are cool as long as the dictator is pro-US right?

    12. Re:Planned obsolescence by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Because Cuba was an egalitarian utopia with no poverty under Batista?

    13. Re:Planned obsolescence by KGIII · · Score: 2

      If you've never been, go. Pretty soon direct flight will be possible and they're even going to send a cruise ship in a few months (end of June, I think?). Go to Canada, put a piece of blank paper in your passport, and fly to Cuba. Go visit now, see them before they're more heavily influenced by America. Cuba will be resigning themselves from the list of communist countries - but not until after Fidel is dead. He's already admitted such as far as I'm told. Go, before they are no longer the Cuba that they are.

      I've been twice and enjoyed it both times. I'm debating going again, just so I can visit one more time before they get hit full in the face with the US. It's not much like most people expect. There's no political undercurrent that's trying to find ways to subvert the regime and oust Raul. The sneakernet that is so talked about? The USB drives have got the latest Mexican soap-operas and most recently translated James Patterson novels. Oh, and music. Lots of music. They're not sneaking around and sharing secret plans and maps to hidden arms caches. They're sharing media.

      The people are cool, they're open and friendly. Don't offer to let them use your computer or anything. Your internet access will be dog-slow if you can even get access in one of the cafes (I never did). Don't do anything crazy and they stamp your passport on the blank page instead of in the book itself. Bring some blank thumb drives - just the smaller ones, not the big ones. Don't put media on 'em, they'll take those and you won't get them back until you leave, if at all. Just put on your cigar smoking lungs, your music listening ears, and your best rum bib.

      And do it before it's too late.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once they break down to a certain point, the labor cost is so expensive that it's cheaper to just get a new car.

      You don't think that isn't by design? Some cars require specialized tools to do oil changes. Oil changes!

      That coupled with specialized parts not available at your local autoparts store, and an increasing amount of plastic parts (i.e.- prone to break) unique to specific models, and no, modern cars will never make it to the collectors market.

      Cars from the 50s and 60s are still on the road today, even largely unmodified, because the parts were mass produced. You will still have an easier time finding a new camshaft for a 50s vintage machine than an intake manifold for a modern car 20 years from now.

    15. Re:Planned obsolescence by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      When new regulations are passed, old cars are grandfathered in, and I don't think Cuba will be an exception to this. The safety regs are for manufacturers. Individuals can ride anything they want if they can build them - even in the States (though you may have to work to get it registered). If anything, there will be more leeway for the old vehicles because of its cultural importance and their part-for-part nature as Cars of Theseus.

    16. Re:Planned obsolescence by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      But dictatorships are cool as long as the dictator is pro-US right?

      I think its a sad truth that some countries aren't really ready for a democracy. In most islamic countries for example, a western like democracy is impossible. The moment the parliament votes for more rights for women, the imams will preach against the government, and by Friday the government is overthrown. The arab spring in syria helped perhaps russia get a weaker position, but mostly it promoted islamic radicalism, which is in my eyes far worse. Assad is a dictator, yes, but at least he kept the state secular, allowing freedom for religious minorities like christians etc. Just look at what happened in india where the hindus took over, they use their political position to promote their religion.

      Russia had free votes once, but they became a dictature again. It all just depends on the political and cultural ambitions of powerful people in the country. In european countries the (christian) churches promote democracy, in poland they even helped democracy to be reestablished. Even most muslim organisations at least claim to support democracy. In russia, the church is actively working against democracy. And the oligarchs want to be kept alone as well, nobody wants any scandals to be brought to the public by some over-eager investigator.

      For a democracy, the people have to support it, actively. If that's not the case, the US president can do whatever they want, but the country doesn't become a democracy. The most powerful man of the world isn't powerful enough for that.

    17. Re:Planned obsolescence by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It was a horrible place where rich landowners held dominion over poor field workers cranking out sugarcane. It was all replaced by the communist party, who held dominion over poor field workers cranking out sugarcane.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:Planned obsolescence by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So extremely wealthy for a tiny minority and grinding poverty for the majority is better than everyone being poor (but having excellent health in fact better health care than some very, very close first world country, for the majority of course, that first world country also the main reason for them being poor in fact done so specifically on purpose).

      As for cars, seriously, cough, cough, hint, hint, the current world price of oil and the need to sell as much as possible as fast as possible, should be a solid indication by now that the electric car will take over from the infernal combustion engine. The actual countdown to it's banning for general use is already on and only restricted use will be allowed ie you will only be allowed to use an infernal combustion engine in an enclosed controlled environment with the operating sharing that environment, you want to pollute you should be the only recipient of your pollution.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its a sad truth that some countries aren't really ready for a democracy.

      Except Cuba did have democracy before Batista. There were even pretty strict term limits to prevent people from trying to seize power. Then the US supported a coalition of right-wingers and the military led by Batista who then went on to seize power as a dictator.

    20. Re:Planned obsolescence by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Sure, Castro ended up being just as bad as Batista in many ways. Yet, people like ArmoredDragon seem to try to act as if Cuba was some sort of glorious utopia of egalitarianism during the Batista years when it couldn't be further from the truth.

    21. Re:Planned obsolescence by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      So extremely wealthy for a tiny minority and grinding poverty for the majority is better than everyone being poor

      Of course it is. The rich are our betters and we should all grin and bear it when they piss on us so that their opulent lifestyles don't get interrupted.

    22. Re:Planned obsolescence by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      After the communists took over Cuba and murdered everyone who resisted, the Cuban people were actually poorer than before. Where did Castro go when he needed medical care? To one of the vaunted Cuban doctors? No fucking way, he went to Spain and saw a real doctor. Under communism, everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    23. Re:Planned obsolescence by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      99% of the country was poor while the top percent had all the power and wealth. Oh and let's not forget the brutal dictator running the place.

      You're talking about Cuba today, right? Because you just described the place to a T.

      But dictatorships are cool as long as the dictator is anti-US right?

      Cuba is a dictatorship today. You know, what bothers me the most about this post is the total lack of self-awareness. Is the poster genuinely ignorant of what Cuba is? Or is fully aware and just blanks out that part of the mind and stops critical thinking whenever the topic of socialism is (apparently) under attack? Because it's one or the other.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    24. Re:Planned obsolescence by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Just put on your cigar smoking lungs, your music listening ears, and your best rum bib.

      I'm a leave the cigars alone, but I do a mean mambo.

      I was able to go some time back, thanks to the fact that I also have a (legal) Italian passport, since my father and grandfather were born there. Went through Montreal-Trudeau. After the air fare, it cost little more than two weeks camping. I had a blast.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    25. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In most islamic countries for example, a western like democracy is impossible. The moment the parliament votes for more rights for women, the imams will preach against the government, and by Friday the government is overthrown.
      That is bullshit, the religion is not the problem, the dictatorships are. Overthrowing a dictatorship is hard, often it fails, even when the people want it.
      Yes these are still deeply conservative societies, but that is not an obstacle to democracy. And democracies are not all equal, women didn't have the right to vote in the west for a long time, but they were still mostly democracies.
      France made many revolutions before it finally stuck, and it was easier then, dictatorships in Libya, Egypt, Syria were/are very organized (police state)
      In Libya and Syria, the government simply killed the pacifist protesters, what can you do against that ? Take arms ? Well it's hard to fight a modern army, especially if the dictatorship is helped by foreign countries (Iran, hezbollah, Russia) and the rebels are not.
      In Egypt, the army tricked the people, and retook power as soon as the new government had problems, yes the muslim government wouldn't have been a beacon of democracy, it could have been a start, it takes time.

      "Assad is a dictator, yes, but at least he kept the state secular, allowing freedom for religious minorities like christians"
      - Assad liberated terrorists just so it could tell the west he was fighting terrorists
      - Assad has been actively killing any moderate opposition so that there is only him or ISIS left
      - Assad actively created fear of religious war to keep the support of minorities

      Even in well established democracies, there is always a threat, the rise of the far-right in Europe and the US is frightening.

    26. Re:Planned obsolescence by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Excellent. I can only go by what you choose to share so I figured it'd be something you might enjoy. I'm glad you got the chance to go and I wish more people had gone - it's so not anything like many people expect. At least not people in the US. We've been blasted with propaganda, from our own media, for a very long time and it's really nothing like that. No, it's not idyllic but it is enjoyable and it was fairly unique.

      And no, you're supposed to smoke a cigar or ten. They won't kill you - unless you keep smoking them. I have to have lungs like the inside of a wood stove's chimney. I only smoke cigars. I smoke like five of 'em in a day. Well, more 3/4 of a cigar, five times. I never finish 'em.

      At any rate, I'm assuming you wore your fancy rum bib... That's pretty much a mandatory item in Cuba. I don't think I've ever actually been sober in Cuba, come to think of it. Surprisingly enough, they let me in a second time. I'm assuming they'll let me back in. I don't remember any reasons why they might not. I'll bend the rules a little bit and have a drink or two when I return. Tradition...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:Planned obsolescence by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat hard to think that in the 50's, Cuba was a somewhat wealthy country.

      Sorry, what?

      In the 50s Cuba was pretty much ran by a corrupt government, who was giving US corporations the rights to build huge hotels and mansions, while the locals were basically cheap labor ... you know, pretty much still the same as colonialism, but with mobsters instead of an occupying country.

      That is until glorious revolution happened, and communism made everybody equally poor.

      Sorry, but they were already poor, living under a dictatorship ran by someone who was basically a puppet for US interests.

      Your understanding of Cuba in the 50s is woefully wrong.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    28. Re:Planned obsolescence by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the way the American law is written, any company that deals with Cuba becomes illegal in America so companies have to make a choice, give up the American market for the Cuban market or don't. Seems that most all companies value the American market more then the Cuban market

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    29. Re:Planned obsolescence by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2

      Only U.S. companies were impacted like that, not companies in other countries, including multi-nationals with different companies in different countries.

      From an anti-embargo article in Forbes: "Moreover, since Europeans, Japanese, and Canadians can travel and conduct business in Cuba unimpeded, the sanctions are rather toothless. The State Department has argued that the cost of conducting business in Cuba is only negligibly higher because of the embargo. For American multinational corporations wishing to undertake commerce in Cuba, foreign branches find it easy to conduct exchanges."

      From a Clinton Administration State department report: "Rationing has been a staple of Cuban life since the early 1960's. During the early 1990's, Cuba's food consumption deteriorated sharply, when massive amounts of Soviet aid were withdrawn. On its own, without Soviet largesse and abundant food imports, Cuban agriculture was paralyzed by a scarcity of inputs and poor production incentives resulting from collectivism and the lack of appropriate price signals. In pre-Castro Cuba, by contrast, food supplies were abundant." one of many quotes showing that pre-revolution Cuba was much more prosperous and that it's collectivism that's killed Cuba. The only thing that propped Cuba up for a while was the much larger Soviet Union paying them off to be a thorn in the side of the U.S.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    30. Re:Planned obsolescence by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Some cars require specialized tools to do oil changes. Oil changes!

      Citation needed.

      Modern cars are lasting beyond 200k miles easily, which is far more than 50s/60s cars could dream of lasting.

    31. Re:Planned obsolescence by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      oh that's why Finnish companies were free to trade high quality steel products to Cuba and Soviets at will and that's why USA didn't block further sales of advanced deep operation submarines to soviets. ...except USA pressured them not to when they felt like it. USA has been meddling with other countries trades with soviets and cuba since the WW2, making it practically impossible for anyone in the west to trade sufficiently advanced products to the eastern block(including cuba).

      yes. the americans would meddle on per-trade basis. setting up an office would have been easy. getting the deal would have been easy. after that the americans(through CIA) would meddle, sometimes even after first greenlighting the trade in the first place! (KGB would meddle too, though).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    32. Re:Planned obsolescence by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it was a utopia by any stretch. What I AM saying is that it's MUCH worse under communism. I mean shit, just look at TFS: They had 60,000 imported cars, and since then they've gotten crappy soviet bloc made cars that have aged much worse. The general population had to have a higher level of wealth during that period of imports that they don't have now.

    33. Re:Planned obsolescence by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Really. So explain to me why the general population was able to afford to import foreign cars back then, but they can't now? They don't even need American cars, they can import Japanese or European cars if they want to, as neither country has an embargo against them. However virtually none of them can afford to do that now. Instead they rely on inheriting the 50's era cars from their grandparents.

    34. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only the engine. The bodies and interior are a total piece of shit.

    35. Re:Planned obsolescence by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Really. So explain to me why the general population was able to afford to import foreign cars back then, but they can't now?

      LOL, are you that clueless?

      The general population wasn't importing them, the rich Americans running hotels were.

      Honestly, read some damned history instead of just making up stupid shit about stuff you don't understand.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    36. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the communists took over Cuba and murdered everyone who resisted, the Cuban people were actually poorer than before. Where did Castro go when he needed medical care? To one of the vaunted Cuban doctors? No fucking way, he went to Spain and saw a real doctor. Under communism, everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.

      That has nothing to do with communism, it simply reflects that the wealth and powerful take advantage of their resources and position. It happens in all sorts of governments and societies. Just look at what Congress gets compared to the VA or those on Medicaid. Some free and equal democracy for America. Can't even adequately serve our own soldiers.

      But no, you haven't shown that the Cuban people were actually poorer than before, and even if true, you can't use that to argue that the Cuban people weren't being harmed by the treatment they were receiving by the forces that existed prior to the Revolution. Even the Mafia. They weren't as benevolent as movies and TV shows make it appear. Ignoring that is something that a lot of people want to do, but you shouldn't. You're just blathering on about an irrelevancy. The average leader and powerful person would still go wherever they wanted for medical care, while the rural peasant would be left to die.

      This would probably be true, regardless of whatever the dictator running the country professed to follow. Or even if it wasn't an actual dictator. If it bothers you, so what are you planning on doing about it? What are you doing to ensure that everybody gets quality medical care?

      Otherwise, you might as well be lamenting for the return of the Tsar.

    37. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Critical thinking is nothing more than agreeing with Marxists. Critical theory is all about employing all the scientific disciplines to oppose life, liberty and property.

      College poisoning is curable [gunshot].

      This message is brought to you by Karl Martell. EDUCATE YOURSELF.

    38. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying it was a utopia by any stretch. What I AM saying is that it's MUCH worse under communism. I mean shit, just look at TFS: They had 60,000 imported cars, and since then they've gotten crappy soviet bloc made cars that have aged much worse. The general population had to have a higher level of wealth during that period of imports that they don't have now.

      When somebody says something that they believe MUST be true, it shows that they didn't really look at the facts.

      Now the quality of Soviet-made cars versus American isn't much in the way of information, as there are numerous political complications that can explain that, so you'll want to look at the distribution of the ownership, the usage of the vehicles, and so forth.

      I doubt you'll be able to get details for the 1950s, but you could roughly look at the number of people in the country and compare it to others, I suppose, but even that may be misleading.

    39. Re:Planned obsolescence by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      At any rate, I'm assuming you wore your fancy rum bib.

      When I go back to Cuba, this is what I'm wearing.

      http://fanpix.famousfix.com/ga...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    40. Re:Planned obsolescence by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Again citation needed.

      Cars used to rust out in 50,000 miles. Now they have galvanized steel and anti-rust coatings. Cars easily last far longer than before. Interiors are a lot nicer too; I've been in 10-year-old cars that look almost brand new. Cars from the 70s weren't anything like that, I remember those pieces of trash well. After 10 years they looked like hell.

      In short, you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. You're one of those morons who sees some fully-restored museum piece from 1959 and stupidly assumes that cars of that era somehow all were just like that without some overly-dedicated owner having the thing stripped down to the metal and rebuilt piece-by-piece.

    41. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Castro regime still has huge control over the economy and they won't be loosening that grip if relations are normalized. The current policy makers in the US just don't care that the Castro brothers confiscated $2 billion (1962 amount) worth of assets belonging to US citizens.

    42. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But their economy was in the top ten of the nations of the Western Hemisphere vs struggling to be competitive with Haiti like today.

    43. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So extremely wealthy for a tiny minority and grinding poverty for the majority is better than everyone being poor (but having excellent health in fact better health care than some very, very close first world country, for the majority of course, that first world country also the main reason for them being poor in fact done so specifically on purpose).

      Yes, I can't wait to have to bring my own medical supplies when I visit the doctor or a hospital like most Cubans do. The Cuban economy is shit because the Castro brothers are die hard centrally planned economy Marxists than ran their economy into the ground. Shit like that happens when you kill the people with capital and/or knowledge of how to run businesses or flee the country via shark infested waters in homemade watercraft. The typical Cuban is much worse off now than what they were in 1962.

    44. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, read some damned history instead of just making up stupid shit about stuff you don't understand.

      That's actually more applicable to you than the dragon.

    45. Re:Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had bothered to read and comprehend the posts instead of taking a crap and patting yourself on the back, or indeed ever picked up a wrench, you might have gleamed the posts make no mention of durability but of parts availability.

      To put this in perspective, the Model T had over 16 million units produced. The best for a modern car is maybe a few hundred thousand. Hell, there were over one million Impalas sold in 1965 alone. There will still be Model Ts and Impalas around long after modern cars have eclipsed a million miles and turned to dust.

      http://www.sears.com/pbt-3-piece-toyota-lexus-oil-change-service-kit/p-00936378000P

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000XML6DU?keywords=Assenmacher&qid=1455672173&ref_=sr_1_15&sr=8-15

      In short, you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

      Quite.

    46. Re:Planned obsolescence by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking idiot. I've worked on cars for over 20 years. Parts are easily available for any modern car; there's no shortage of websites selling every single part that any new car is made with, right down to the sheet metal pieces.

    47. Re: Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it went from something that could have been like Chile and went to a hell on earth dump.

  5. and use the dmca to lock out 3rd party repairs by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and use the dmca to lock out 3rd party repairs you have to go to the dealer for any fix.

  6. What's the computer by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    analogy to this?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:What's the computer by present_arms · · Score: 2

      Analogy, It's like having that Eniac machine except now it's a Quadcore i7 running TB of ssds but with the original eniac caseing

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    2. Re:What's the computer by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      With so much empty space you could live inside of the rest of that thing.

  7. Can we have that here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hoo-ray SOCIALISM!

    Where keeping 50-year-old cars running is a NECESSITY!

    Health care? Yeah, if you only had 1,500 cal/day to eat and had to walk everywhere, you'd be healthy too. Remember, Castro went to SPAIN when he needed medical care...

    1. Re:Can we have that here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hoo-ray SOCIALISM! Where keeping 50-year-old cars running is a NECESSITY!

      And it's so wonderfully nostalgic and environmentally friendly! Just like buying organic heirloom tomatoes, handpicked by illegal Mexicans, from Whole Foods and then driving home to your mansion in your $120k Tesla limousine!

  8. FTFY by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> These aren't sitting in showroom-like garages of wealthy collectors....yet.

    FTFY. The free market will ensure that the best of these cars make into collector's hands quickly. And I wouldn't cry for the Cubans who sell them to the "stupid Americans" for 5x their value in Cuba - they'll each be laughing to the bank with their relative wealth.

    1. Re:FTFY by ooloorie · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, US progressives will soon pass laws to end this price gouging and exploitation of the Cuban proletariat by capitalist oppressors! A bit of common sense regulation will ensure that Cubans who sell their classic cars will receive a fair price and protect them from the evil corruption associated with the US dollar!

    2. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lazy trolling is lazy.

  9. LOL so silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when we can 3D print any car we want, preserving these old cars is a Luddite thing to do. As a matter of fact, if we send just one 3D printer to Cuba, the entire country's standard of living will dramatically increase within hours.

  10. Re:Yeaaa by whipslash · · Score: 1

    I very much enjoyed this story

  11. Re:Yeaaa by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

    As did I - though driven as my necessity as anything else, it's an interesting tale of hardware hacking.

  12. Re:Yeaaa by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

    There's more to nerdom than computers.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  13. Great Classic Cars by shubus · · Score: 1

    You'll see these classic cars all over Havana. They are often used as taxi's and are fun to ride in. Most owners take great pride in maintaining them, too. These guys were hacking these cars before the word came to mean what it does today---they had to learn to improvise since they couldn't get parts. (You should see what they do for TV antennas!) Most of the modern cars you see there are Chinese.

  14. Frankencars by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    My Dad and I both are gearheads, it is something as a much younger man I did not really get into, but as I got older I purposely made myself take an interest in as an excuse to find time to spend with the oldman. One of the networks (TV) is running a show about how a 'master' mechanic in Cuba keeps these so-called Frankencars running with scraps, bailing wire, and pure 'engine-nuity'. I think it would be so-cool to gather up a boatload of what we would call useless scrap parts and take them to Cuba for donation to those folks and see what they could produce. A Dodgsel, with a chevrolac rear end.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Frankencars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet! I wish I could work on cars, it's a great skill to have.

  15. Selling point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Cuba is a wonderland of classic cars.

    It will become a cultural attraction and a piece of living history for the imminent American tourist holidays, so Cuba should strive to keep those cars running.

    1. Re: Selling point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google should use Cuba as the first place self-driving cars become the norm. The juxtaposition would be fun to watch. Especially if they have a retrofit option.

  16. Preserving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They haven't been preserved. Lots of major parts have been replaced by non-original components. But then, I don't really think anything of value was lost. Most American cars of the era were complete and utter crap. Preserving a few can be interesting for documentation and nostalgia, but I think that has been done enough in the U.S.

    1. Re:Preserving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      66 Most American cars of the era were complete and utter crap. 99

      In those days, cars had thick wall skirted blocks, forged steel connecting rods, forged steel cranks. Since the 1990's, powdered metal technology for connecting rods is a result of engineering for public policy purposes. PM tech for gears maybe. Rods, no. I would rather have overbuilt than "just enough" engineering.

      It is all about the screed of the insurance industry "Strong engines invite speeding!"

  17. The dour truth of the matter is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Communism is cool because it is all about sucking up to college professors so as to graduate. Communism is cool because that is what the media and entertainment sector has carefully taught the post Cold War generations.

    College poisoning is curable [gunshot].

    This message is brought to you by Karl Martell. EDUCATE YOURSELF.