Slashdot Mirror


NASA Wants To Get Supersonic With New Passenger Jet (networkworld.com)

coondoggie writes: NASA wants to put a supersonic passenger jet back in the sky that promises to a soft thump or supersonic heartbeat as the agency called it - rather than the disruptive boom currently associated with such high-speed flight. The 'low-boom' aircraft known as Quiet Supersonic Technology (QueSST) will be built by a team led by Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. It will cost $20 million to develop baseline aircraft requirements and a preliminary aircraft design.

3 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. What's the market? by msauve · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and what sort of fuel economy will it get?

    Boeing failed with the SST, due to anticipated fuel costs not meeting market needs. Similarly with the Concorde, which couldn't operate profitably.

    Sure, there are some rich folk who would pay for short flight times, but the mass market is price conscious. The problem with supersonic flight is not sonic booms, but efficiency.

    Finally, why is NASA wasting taxpayer money designing passenger aircraft for the civilian market?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  2. Re:This will only help the wealthy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Concord is a variety of grape. Indeed, there can be some expensive wines out there. This story is about fast planes, however. Maybe you mean the Concorde?

  3. Re:This will only help the wealthy... by blindseer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Refrigeration is only for the wealthy. Automobiles are only for the wealthy. Indoor plumbing is only for the wealthy. Computers are only for the wealthy. Going to college is only for the wealthy. Electric cars are only for the wealthy.

    Ethanol subsidies are just corporate welfare. Windmill subsidies are just corporate welfare. Solar panel subsidies are just corporate welfare. Electric car subsidies are just corporate welfare. Government backed student loans are just corporate welfare. CFL subsidies are just corporate welfare.

    Isn't it funny on how the definition of "wealthy" and "corporate welfare" changes depending on the who, when, and where? There's plenty of evidence that what is now a luxury that only the 1% could afford will eventually become affordable for the other 99%.

    Oh, and let's pick on just the Republicans because the Democrats NEVER give free stuff to corporations.

    If there is something to complain about with government spending then I can give much better examples than funding NASA to research high speed flight. Researching high speed flight is EXACTLY the kind of thing that NASA was created to do.

    Go soak your head.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.