Slashdot Mirror


ISIS Supporters Abandon U.S. Encryption Tools As Apple-FBI Fight Rages

blottsie writes: Islamic State militants and supporters are promoting strong encryption tools from outside the United States that the American government cannot touch with legislation. In the last month, Islamic State supporters have promoted security software from Finland, Romania, America, France, the Czech Republic, Canada, Panama, Germany, Switzerland, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and other nations, a Daily Dot review found. The international availability of encryption technology, of which Islamic State militants are well aware, underscores FBI Director James Comey's long-held desire to build an international legal regime to deal with the problems posed by encryption, what he calls "going dark."

162 comments

  1. Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just sayin'.

    1. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Especially if the terrorists are posting geo-tagged selfies from a bunker on Twitter.

    2. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's exactly what America needs to worry about. If our government is only going to be able to spy on us but not our adversary, then it makes sense that they'll be shooting their missiles at us instead of our adversaries. We'll have no defense, unlike ISIS. We The People need to keep up with ISIS and make sure that we are at least as hard to spy on, as they are.

      So I think that means we need to get our computers and software from overseas. And if that means US economy shifts from tech jobs to McDonalds jobs, then I guess we are getting the policies that we wanted back when we decided to vote for Democrats and Republicans, instead of serious real-life politicians.

      It always comes back to the same thing: we met the enemy, and it was us. America is America's biggest problem.

    3. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      How about if they start posting selfies with geotags spoofed with the location of the nearest MSF hospital? Or just go there, post a few pics saying you've moved to a new hideaway, then run like hell.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the US intelligence or law enforcement community is going to win this one. They may try, but there's too many ways around this.

      Unfortunately, it won't prevent them from trying, which could be a problem, but its going to go the way of the RSA "weaponized" encryption.

      Ultimately, when faced with perfect or even really, really good encryption, your only real choice is to change tactics. It doesn't matter how good their encryption is, if you have a spy on the other end or you're able to survail the message after it was decrypted. We need more and better human intelligence, and we need people thinking out of the box. No law or regulation is going to stop criminals from using something that is outlawed, especially if those items are freely and legally available anywhere else.

    5. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      How about if they start posting selfies with geotags spoofed with the location of the nearest MSF hospital?

      Analysts will double check the location to verify that the target is legit before sending off a drone. After all the blown up wedding parties in Afghanistan, the military is trying to avoid those mistakes.

    6. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2
      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by GlennC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Analysts will double check the location to verify that the target is legit before sending off a drone.

      That's a good one...their check will be, "Are they brown and in the Middle East? Then we're good to go."

      After all the blown up wedding parties in Afghanistan, the military is trying to avoid those mistakes.

      They're only trying to avoid the publicity.

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    8. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by fnj · · Score: 1

      After all the blown up wedding parties in Afghanistan, the military is trying to avoid those mistakes.

      And they are doing such a swell job, too! /sarc

    9. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analysts will double check the location to verify that the target is legit before sending off a drone.

      That's a good one...their check will be, "Are they brown and in the Middle East? Then we're good to go."

      After all the blown up wedding parties in Afghanistan, the military is trying to avoid those mistakes.

      They're only trying to avoid the publicity.

      "Well it's their fault for bringing their kids into a battle."

    10. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Encryption has been a hot topic since 1776 when Paul Revere used his lantern to pass a coded message to his fellow terrorists from a church tower. we can all decrypt this message now, likely because we are descendants of those terrorists that the message was meant for "One if by land. Two if by sea"

      were we criminals? well, history is written by the victor...

    11. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good one...their check will be, "Are they brown and in the Middle East?

      Can we go nuclear then?

    12. Re: Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Agreed; by deliberately:

      * not being American or Israeli

      * having an objection to American Imperialism

      * being far enough away from the US and different enough (they don't wear baseball caps ffs - obviousy terrorists!) that they make good enemies-of-the-US for propaganda purposes

      * then having the indecency to have children they have clearly brought this on themselves

    13. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Analysts will double check the location

      I don't think that word thinks what you think it means.

      Oh, were you being sarcastic?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    14. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Oh, were you being sarcastic?

      Not based on the story I read about.

      Air Force General Hawk Carlisle, head of Air Combat Command, explains how the mission was made possible. âoeThe guys that were working down out of Hurlburt, they're combing through social media and they see some moron standing at this command. And in some social media, open forum, bragging about the command and control capabilities for Daesh, ISIL. And these guys go: 'We got an in.' So they do some work, long story short, about 22 hours later through that very building, three [Joint Direct Attack Munitions] take that entire building out.â

      http://www.techlicious.com/blog/isis-terrorist-selfie-bombing/

      I'm making the presumption that the analysts spent some time searching for the specific location and not trying to find some misplaced bombs.

    15. Re:Ain't gonna stop a hellfire missile.... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I wasn't being sarcastic either.

      The efficiency of the US military's checking of information is well reported. http://www.doctorswithoutborde...

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the last month, Islamic State supporters have promoted security software from Finland, Romania, America, France, the Czech Republic, Canada, Panama, Germany, Switzerland, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and other nations...

    Is that "America" something other than the US?
    I know there are two continents using that name, but they seem to be listing countries.

    1. Re:Confused by MitchDev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FBI must be desperate, trying to lump people who believe in security with terrorists...

    2. Re:Confused by aldousd666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you outlaw good cryptography, then only outlaws will have good cryptography

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    3. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The insertion of the America in the list is the result of a successful operation by an American information warfare unit. Mission accomplished and ISIS sales guaranteed!

    4. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those outlaughs better have their own compiler, os, language an a semiconductor fab.

      comprendre ?

    5. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They even have that in Best Korea.

    6. Re: Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say the same when it comes to guns

    7. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you outlaw difficult subfields of math, then only bad people will have to take hard classes in school.

    8. Re:Confused by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then we should definitely outlaw government snooping on people. Then they'll only snoop on bad people, which ... well, isn't that bad.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Confused by kheldan · · Score: 1

      'aldousd666' is modded as 'funny' when he should be modded as 'insightful'; we see in TFA exactly what I and others have predicted, well in advance, fortunately, of it actually affecting anyone: You ruin encryption for everyone, then the Bad Guys will just get their own, non-ruined encryption, and you're back where you started from.

      o Making speeding against the law doesn't stop people from speeding.
      o Making pickpocketing illegal doesn't stop people from pickpocketing.
      o It being against the law to drink under the legal drinking age doesn't stop underage drinking.
      o Requiring technology companies to have a 'backdoor' in their encryption won't stop criminals from using non-compromised encryption.

      How much more clear does this have to be for anyone to understand it?

      Memo to FBI, NSA, and other overeager, overreaching, anal-retentive, power-hungry types: You're being stupid, and your stupidity will be everyone's undoing. Or do you want to give up now and admit to the World that the so-called, self-styled 'islamic state' is smarter than you are?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    10. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it's juts short for "United States of America", and chosen to not be ambiguous with "United States of Mexico".

      The continents are "North America" or "South America" (or collectively The Americas). As far as I'm aware the only other Americas would be the family of the cartographer.

    11. Re:Confused by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      The backwards, religious nutjob-laden "islamic state" IS smarter than the FBI, NSA, etc.

      Not to mention the "islamic state" is actually willing to get off its ass and do its own work...

    12. Re:Confused by jc42 · · Score: 1

      If you outlaw good cryptography, then only outlaws will have good cryptography

      Hmmm ... The usual version says "... only outlaws will have secrets". But both versions work.

      (Actually, both are wrong; they should say "... only outlaws and governments will have ...". ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  3. Give them ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Israel's bombing of an iraq nuclear reactor basically started the weaponized nuclear program in iraq: http://972mag.com/the-myth-of-...

    Same goes for politicans demanding to ban encryption because terrorists could use it. The paris terrorists didn't use encryption. But ISIS now will make sure they will use encryption from now on.

    1. Re:Give them ideas by pastafazou · · Score: 2

      What a pile of BS that article you linked to is. Saddam Hussein indicated in 1975 that the purchase of the reactor from France was "the first Arab attempt at nuclear arming" source
      Make sure you read the full article. It's quite enlightening, especially the part about how Saddam determined Iraq needed an insider at the IAEA in order to find out how it operated, what it knew, and how best to keep their program hidden from them.

    2. Re:Give them ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're too busy studying the Koran and practicing blind firing AKs to really learn how to do anything with a computer beyond make a twitter post. It's a culture of ignorance with an ignorance feedback loop built right into it.

  4. This article is propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goodbye, Slashdot. It was nice to know you.

    1. Re:This article is propaganda by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank God! Anonymous Coward is the worst member of this site... always stirring up trouble! I'll be glad to see him go!

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    2. Re:This article is propaganda by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Fortunately /. consists more of comments than articles and, and this is a rare thing these days, there is no comment removal going on.

      In other words, any kind of propaganda posted here WILL backfire. Badly. Like this one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:This article is propaganda by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Wait! Don't go!
      We're sorry. We can change I swear, just give us another chance!

      Please?!?
                  Please stay. If not for us, do it for the children.

  5. Not dark. by penguinoid · · Score: 2

    The international availability of encryption technology, of which Islamic State militants are well aware, underscores FBI Director James Comey's long-held desire to build an international legal regime to deal with the problems posed by encryption, what he calls "going dark."

    Almost all of the data the FBI is interested in was already supposed to be inaccessible to them. So maybe encryption should be called, "going legit".

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Not dark. by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Yes, that.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    2. Re:Not dark. by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But seriously, encryption is for the government what a time-locked fridge is for a fatso. They just can't help themselves, they got no impulse control, they need help. Encryption is the solution to help a government that can't help themselves.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  6. Reaction Gifs by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I wish slashdot permitted embedded images, cause things like this just beg to for a nice big Nelson HA HA.

  7. We need a new FBI director. by Brannon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The current one is shaking his fist at a storm. Why can't we hire someone who has some common sense about technology?

    You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube, encryption is here to stay--and there's nothing you can do about it.

    1. Re:We need a new FBI director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buuuuut SPYING is HARD *humph*

    2. Re:We need a new FBI director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ain't gonna be fixed anytime soon. Whoever the next president is - hillary, trump, cruz, whatever - is going to continue the time-honored practice of appointing their best campaign supporters, yes men and cronies to these positions.

    3. Re:We need a new FBI director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Administration always lags a good decade or four behind tech. This has been a problem ever since the end of the middle ages, when the pace of scientific knowledge acquisition reached an unprecedented height for humanity.

      So, we can't hire such a person because no qualified candidates grew up with modern tech (or with the means, motive, and opportunity to stay current in their understanding).

    4. Re:We need a new FBI director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is Comey, he gets a huge boner devising new ways to fuck Americans in the ass.

    5. Re:We need a new FBI director. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      This may be a sign that the current efforts at quantum computers are finally paying off. And he wants everyone to trust encryption that is breakable by anyone with a big enough budget.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:We need a new FBI director. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's not the director's position to understand security on such a level? Granted, it does mean his advisers are morons but I tremble as to what a director with a great knowledge of encryption would do knowing that he likely doesn't have the chops to address world affairs, foreign policy and law enforcement logistics in a useful way.

      Not saying that there may not be someone out there like that but they're few and far between and given such a background you need to further wonder why they'd be interested in such a post.

    7. Re:We need a new FBI director. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Still, it is necessary to vilify it to the public, so that anybody who uses it it will be tagged as 'suspicious', with 'something to hide'. These PR campaigns are quite effective in creating a panic.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  8. Can't roll their own? by unixisc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Islamic State supporters have promoted security software from Finland, Romania, America, France, the Czech Republic, Canada, Panama, Germany, Switzerland, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and other nations, a Daily Dot review found.

    For the people that love (falsely) claiming that they came up w/ the number system and zero, it's fascinating that they have to promote encryption software from the above countries - ALL non-Muslim - to protect their jihad-plotting communications from being broken into. Can't they get encryption software from Islamic paradises, like Malaysia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Emirates, Iran, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, et al? Or (gasp), even roll their own in their labs in Raqqa, Mosul, Sirte...

    1. Re: Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being stupid enough to try rolling their own crypto actually makes it seem like someone over there knows what they're doing.

  9. bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the entire premise seems doubtful. we are feed disinformation. wmd comes to mind.

  10. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they want to make sure 99,99% of all computers are nicely backdoored.

    Then you can have the latest super duper crypto algorithm and it will be moot.

    They pursue this strategy since they managed to kill off Algol in favour of C. Algol based computers were simply too hard to backdoor. And they have suckered most of our fellow programmers into their scheme.

  11. Re:Can't roll their own? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that they included "America" in the list. Despite America being the name of a continent (or up to 3, depending on the criteria, or lack thereof) there is only one nation that commonly goes by the name "America".

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  12. DUH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DUH. Did anyone not think this would happen? It's just like the argument to outlaw guns. If you do only the criminals, who don't give a crap about your laws, will have guns and law-abiding citizens will have nothing to protect themselves from the criminals, be it encryption to protect cc info from hackers or guns to protect against home invaders.

  13. Way to screw yourself, FBI by rs1n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before the big commotion between the FBI and Apple, they (the FBI) at least had a chance of breaking into a phone (made by Apple) that was used by an ISIS member (by the help of Apple, through legal means). Now the FBI has essentially shot themselves in the foot. Their demands have basically been a loud horn warning ISIS to stay away from the very technology (phones by American companies) that they could actually get access to... 'cause... well, good luck getting foreign companies to make backdoors for you.

    1. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4, Informative

      More than that, Apple to date has been handing over information which they actually had in their possession... iCloud data and so forth... in response to valid warrants and subpoenas. It was specifically the FBI's abuse of the all writs act, demanding that they rebuild iOS in order to introduce a security-crippling backdoor, to which Apple objected; not cooperation with law enforcement in general.

      With their current overreach, and the public spectacle they decided to make out of it, they not only cut themselves off from any information that would have been on the phones themselves in the future; they've pretty much assured that anyone using an iPhone as part of a nefarious endeavor will make sure not to upload anything to iCloud going forward. I seem to recall a fable about killing the goose that lays golden eggs.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    2. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ter'ists generally aren't using encryption anyway, the whole thing is a power grab by the FBI to snoop on Americans. The traitors at the FBI are attacking the Constitution and using terrorists, ISIS, yadda yadda as pretty weak excuses.

    3. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by swb · · Score: 1

      It's that law enforcement mindset of demanding compliance rather than asking for cooperation.

    4. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would actually make a lot of sense if this was a black ops.

      The militants would think exactly like you are... meanwhile, the FBI throws APL a few million dollars to willfully allow security bypass while publicly protesting.

      You honestly think APL is doing this because they care? They've only ever cared about their own bottom line and any threats to it: DRM? Nope, only until after an large company like Amazon pioneered it. "Security" by restricting to just one app store? They just want their 30% cut for doing nothing more than hosting a glorified website. Randomly changing screw heads? LOL Making it extremely difficult to maintain / replace parts for desktops and laptops? LOL

    5. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, everything's a "black ops" conspiracy. When you're ready to put away the bong, take the tinfoil off your head, stop staring at the chemtrails, and have a shower; let us know and we'll make room at the grown-ups' table.

    6. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The FBI is screwing over the American economy really. NO big company, foreign or domestic that cares about their security will use any American product. Heck, even Apple might decide to simply leave the US, it has enough cash to relocate all it's core designers and developers and their extended families to some other place.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      With their current overreach, and the public spectacle they decided to make out of it, they not only cut themselves off from any information that would have been on the phones themselves in the future; they've pretty much assured that anyone using an iPhone as part of a nefarious endeavor will make sure not to upload anything to iCloud going forward. I seem to recall a fable about killing the goose that lays golden eggs.

      There are actually many good reasons to do local backups (non-iCloud) through iTunes. And in fact, encrypted local backups make a lot of sense because the iCloud and unencrypted backups do not contain some information Apple deems sensitive.

      Examples include e-mail credentials - iCloud will not store your credentials at all. Apple doesn't want it and if they don't collect it, they can't hand it over, either. The same goes with unencrypted backups - again, Apple doesn't want to store the information unencrypted and make it a backdoor into iOS data.

      They ARE stored if you use encrypted backups since it's encrypted and the key is different and not necessarily tied to your Apple ID password, PIN or other identifier.

    8. Re:Way to screw yourself, FBI by stackOVFL · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, wait a minute there bub. Are you telling my that "donuts on a rope" isn't proof in the Aurora? Yeah right. Lets see you use you logic on this: tomorrow is 3/3/2016: 3+3 = 6, 6/2 = 3 and 2+0+1+6=9, 9/3 = 3!. Half Life 3 CONFIRMED!

  14. Dear ISIS.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    ROT13 is still uncracked by the US government and will forever stay safe to use.

    Even the worlds best encryption experts can not break ROT13.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Dear ISIS.... by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

      I encrypt everything as a Perl program.

      Unfortunately it's then also uncrackable even by me.

    2. Re:Dear ISIS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least it runs better than Ruby.

    3. Re:Dear ISIS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be safer, I always use 200 iterations of ROT13!

    4. Re:Dear ISIS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get with the times! I use 42 log_rounds of ROT13!

    5. Re:Dear ISIS.... by niff · · Score: 1

      ROT13 is considered to be unsafe. Nowadays it's best to go for ROT26...

  15. Here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, thats right, those terrible people (the TERORISTS) that want to kill all of us for no reason. Hold on, maybe there is a reason after all. Maybe they are fed up of US,UK bombs dropping on their heads over the last decades.

    Heres a thought... a logical one I think... instead of trying to monitor all communications and create a great deal of internet collateral damage, we just STOP FUCKING BOMBING OTHER COUNTRIES!!!!!!! then maybe we won't need to watch our backs all the fucking time. We'll also regain the ability to talk without 10 stooges listening and judging us at every turn.

    Its funny isn't it. The very thing the west does to stop """"""TERORISM""""""" is exactly the thing that causes it. to them we are the terrorists!! And we have done are far worse to them then they have managed to do to us.

    Fuck I hate idiot governments. but more so the people that are indiferent to bombing other countries.

    1. Re:Here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +100

    2. Re:Here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd ever read anything more in-depth than the current issue of High Times you'd know that this has nothing to do with us bombing them. Now that your lunch hour is over, go back to your 10th grade history class and try paying attention.

    3. Re:Here we go again... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many bombs were dropping on their head in 1993 (first WTC). How many bombs were dropping on their heads in 2001?

      Maybe the topic is more complicated than Western bombing causing terrorism.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  16. Hang 'em with their own cord. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is all those countries listed, ISIS would love to destroy.

    1. Re:Hang 'em with their own cord. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The only entity ISIS doesn't want to destroy is itself, and that is debatable.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  17. cheating at the game. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the US is a country spending nearly 1.4 trillion dollars per year on defense. It dwarfs the spending of the next 7 largest countries combined. Americans endured this sort of breakneck spending for 50 years under the guise that, once communism fell, we would embrace a newfound wave of peace in the west.

    instead we've invented boogeymen by hook and by crook. We invented ISIS by the iraq war. We invented the iraq war by weapons of mass destruction. we invented the war on terror by 9/11. we invented 9/11 by founding and training al-quaeda. we invented al-quaeda by funding an training the mujahadeen. we invented the war in afghanistan by proxy through our desire to defeat russias communism. we invented communism as a threat through the implicit desire of our oligarchy and capital class to disarm any real objection to capitalism by any means necessary.

    now we're faced with a guerilla enemy, as we were when we created most of our proxy wars in central and south america...but the rules have changed. our "wars" before were innocuous as they werent winnable or loseable, only profitable. we would fight until public opinion turned, then broker a peace deal and leave. Sometimes with oil contracts, other times with infrastructure contracts. Now with the advent of a perfect shield by which our newly created enemy can conceal their intent, we are all but on a level playing field. an actor needs no longer obtain advanced weapons or tactics to defeat us, they merely need to plan extensively.

    the solution is to step back from the carter doctrine of foreign policy, and deprecate our dependency on defense economy.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:cheating at the game. by ITRambo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Great summary of how the US military-industrial complex works in today's world. Eisenhower's farewell address warned of the power this growing (at the time) hybrid group of military leaders and defense contractors has. They aren't about to give it up for the sake of a better world.

    2. Re:cheating at the game. by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but while there are definitely unforeseen consequences in some of those events, we didn't "invent" communism as a threat. Communism did that all by themselves. Communism from the beginning was a theory that expected the export of revolution, and violent revolution at that. It was right and proper to fight it head on. While workers were certainly being exploited by owners, there are still other ways than exporting violence.

      Now, if you were to suggest that it is possible that fighting monsters makes it easier to make a monster out of yourself, I would not disagree. However, let's not lose ourselves in the blame game and mistake cause for effect. There are things you fight against because they are wrong, but there is also a battle within to ensure that you don't become just as bad. There are two different things.

      Losing the second battle doesn't mean the first was wrong to fight. If someone was to attack my wife, I would be 100% right to get that person away from her, and put him in a position that he could not hurt her again by knocking him on his ass.

      However, if I was then to go burn his house down and torture and then kill his family because I was so consumed by rage that I wanted to end his entire genetic line, then I've gone too far.

      In the second "part" of the scenario one could certainly suggest to me that I have done worse to this person than he ever did to me, but don't tell me that I had no right to end the initial threat that he posed. The question instead is one of self-control and perspective.

      Should we have done everything possible to end Communism, including supporting dictators? I don't think so. Should we have opposed Communism directly and without compromise for the evils in that system? Absolutely yes. We made the right decision, we just failed to avoid entering the mud with the pigs.

    3. Re:cheating at the game. by butchersong · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well I'm not going to get into our conduct in the middle east but our navy does essentially enable the modern world, enforcing maritime law and safe trade on the oceans. Of course I suppose that enables the consumer culture and oursourcing of labor and manufacturing.. but that is another argument.

    4. Re:cheating at the game. by eam · · Score: 2

      However, if I was then to go burn his house down and torture and then kill his family because I was so consumed by rage that I wanted to end his entire genetic line, then I've gone too far.

      We'll have to agree to disagree.

    5. Re:cheating at the game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism from the beginning was a theory that expected the export of revolution, and violent revolution at that. It was right and proper to fight it head on.

      So you say communism expected the spread of violent revolution (the oppressed rising up against their oppressors) and then you say it was right to stop these revolutions from taking place. By your logic the American revolution should never have occurred either.

    6. Re:cheating at the game. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      the US is a country spending nearly 1.4 trillion dollars per year on defense. It dwarfs the spending of the next 7 largest countries combined.

      I wonder how much of that is actually spent on defense and how much is spent on offense

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:cheating at the game. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The American Revolution did not start from the expectation of violence. There had been tensions growing ever since the end of the French and Indian War where a number of colonists tried to work with the mother country to obtain peaceful redress which was not forthcoming.

      There is no question that the American Revolution was a cousin to the French Revolution which then became one of the models for Communist revolution, but again, it is a matter of scale and goals.

      Communism's goal was violent revolution from the get-go. And it wanted to export that revolution to the world. The colonies in America just wanted to be able to govern themselves from a local government and assure certain rights. I don't think there is a direct comparison unless you insist that just because it was called a Revolution that it was equivalent to what the communists wanted. I don't think you can really make that case.

      But don't get me wrong, I don't buy into the completely sainted depiction of the American Revolution either. That it ended up being a war, instead of being negotiated, was a failure. That it produced a reasonably decent product was that the idea of Revolution didn't take over and completely rip the country apart meant that worked out about as well as can be expected. In fact, I think the greatest thing about the American Revolution was not that it happened, but that the people like Washington and the rest, put down their swords at the end of it and didn't try and build a new regime based on brute force and personality. We could easily have ended up being led by a dictator or king, instead, we managed to weather that storm and that result is probably more important than the Revolution itself ever was.

  18. Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISIS supporters; Obviously you are not aware that ISIS is supplied and funded by the Obama administration.

  19. Re:Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's also surprising that the Quran doesn't discuss any encryption algorithm. I would have expected the Jihad chapter to contain one section per century containing advice specific to that century.

  20. "US" != "America" by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    just saying

    1. Re:"US" != "America" by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, but no other country in the Americas goes by "America". You either say it is from the Americas (which is probably what they meant) or you say North or South America.

      You could say that calling it the "United States" is also wrong, because Mexico is actually officially, the "United States of Mexico". The fact is that, no one from Mexico or the US really cares.

      Referring to the US as "America" is pretty much accepted by everyone, including the other people living on the American continents. They don't really care if the US has used the shorthand.

      And I should also note that the USA is the oldest existing independent country in the Americas, so the short hand made even more sense at the beginning.

    2. Re:"US" != "America" by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Referring to the US as "America" is pretty much accepted by everyone other than pedants and people with an axe to grind .

      FTFY.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    3. Re:"US" != "America" by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Yes, by stupid people, and also by smart people and people in between.

      US and America both have ambiguous derivations. USA or "US American" is technically unambiguous, but people called that Miss America contestant a moron, in part, for saying "US Americans" in her famous response.

      South Africa is a country in the south of Africa, but lots of countries in the southern part of Africa are not South Africa. Lesotho is actually entirely contained inside South Africa, in the South of Africa and south of much of South Africa, without being South Africa.

      The problem comes because Spanish (and Portuguese?) has a similar-sounding word with a similar origin that doesn't fit with English usage, and people think the word itself must have some universal prime meaning.

    4. Re:"US" != "America" by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 1

      I'm Dutch, I live in Chile and I've run into a few annoyed/angry "well, we're American(s) too" situations with the locals. So I use "USAmerican" as the pc version of what the people here just call "gringo/gringa".

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
    5. Re:"US" != "America" by fnj · · Score: 1

      ... And here come the stupid prick moderators.

    6. Re:"US" != "America" by fnj · · Score: 1

      Here we have someone who is NOT stupid.

    7. Re:"US" != "America" by shawn2772 · · Score: 2

      Referring to the US as "America" is pretty much accepted by everyone other than pedants and people with an axe to grind .

      FTFY.

      And people who live in America, but not in the United States of America. It's pretty unusual for Latin Americans to use "America" to refer to the US, for example.

    8. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope.. We usually call the country "Estados Unidos" or Gringos.. I'm from Colombia. America is the whole continent for us.

    9. Re:"US" != "America" by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      This country is called "America" by almost everyone here. Our patriotic songs call it that too, as do our politicians and journalists. We're Americans, we live in America, and you don't get to name us or our nation.

    10. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Which continent? North America and South America are two different continents. I realize most of Latin America teaches that they are one large continent; they are wrong. Geologically, they're on two different tectonic plates. They only recently (on a geologic timeframe) came into contact with each other.

      Of course, calling the USA "Estados Unidos" is also ambiguous, as Mexico could also be called that.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    11. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Or by people who aren't taught a ridiculous continent model, like most of Latin America is. North and South America are different continents. They're on separate tectonic plates and (on a geologic timescale) only came into contact recently. By any reasonable definition of "continent", they are not the same. Therefore, if you want to refer to the mass as a whole, "the Americas" is correct, while "America" is not.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    12. Re:"US" != "America" by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      " They only recently (on a geologic timeframe) came into contact with each other."

      And more recently we said "No touching!" and cut a trench through Panama to keep them apart.

    13. Re:"US" != "America" by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      No, it's pretty much rejected by sanctimonious leftists with axes to grind.

    14. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the tip!

    15. Re:"US" != "America" by jc42 · · Score: 1

      No, it's pretty much rejected by sanctimonious leftists with axes to grind.

      And also by the sanctimonious language pedants (that others have mentioned) who've been trying to impose their bizarre syntax ideas from other languages on English, rather than the normal (Germanic) syntax that the rest of the native-speaking population uses. ;-)

      Actually, the folks who follow the online linguistic forums do get a bit of fun out of mocking the latest attempts by the "peevers" (as they're generally known in such circles) to miscorrect someone else's normal English. And sometimes such things can lead to useful bits of educational material for those interested in how English and related languages actually work.

      (The general theory is that most of the bogus syntax rules that the pedants have been foisting arose historically from the time when "educated" people knew and used Latin and/or Greek. Those were "real" languages, while English was a lower-class argot from that obscure island to the northwest of the real Europe. When English became a major language and the older status languages were phased out, it became useful to try to standardize the language somewhat. But the self-appointed experts in the subject knew that Latin and Greek were the only languages with real syntaxes, so they tried to impose their rules on English. It hasn't worked, of course, but that hasn't stopped them.

      The other growing source of entertainment on such forums is the large body of bizarre English that is being collected all over the world. There's some really funny stuff there, and trying to understand how the translations came about can lead to insights about the differences between human languages. But that's an entire different topic that isn't really relevant here.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    16. Re:"US" != "America" by dryeo · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that California, at least that part that is west of the San Andreas Fault, is a separate continent? Different tectonic plate you know. Then there are the parts of Siberia that are on the N. American plate.
      There a few definitions of continent with 4, 5, 6 and 7 continents depending on definition and being a human construction, they're all correct including the weird one that USA adopted about 60 years ago. Before that the Americans correctly considered that since North and South America are currently connected, they are one landmass and since continent basically means one land mass, they are one continent.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    17. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1
      Parts of California are on a separate plate, but it's small enough that it generally wouldn't be considered a separate continent. That part of CA could be considered a subcontinent just like India, which is on its own plate (but is substantially larger than CA).

      currently connected

      Well, that's no longer true, ever since the Panama canal. We say that Europe and Asia are different continents, even though they are much better connected than North and South America. There's no reason to consider the Americas one continent. And it's not just America that adopted this model; large parts of Asia and Europe (which generally consider each other to be different continents, despite having less justification for doing so) also distinguish between them.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    18. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny, for the AD reference.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    19. Re:"US" != "America" by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Well if the combination of a lake, river and canal is enough to split continents, the Illinois and Michigan Canal (later replaced with the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal) split N. America into NW America and NE America way back in 1848.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    20. Re: "US" != "America" by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Helllllo ppl. This case had already been dealt with in the case 'by pedants...' :P

    21. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a number of years since I've seen anyone, anywhere stink so badly and so publicly at a job than 'timothy.' He's a Cut-And-Paste King that can't even spell the words 'proof read' or 'edit.'

      The self-loathing, ass-licking sycophants using post-rationalization and out-right lying are sometimes amusing, but mostly just tiresome. The US isn't in the Americas? Wow.

    22. Re:"US" != "America" by bentcd · · Score: 1

      Yes, but no other country in the Americas goes by "America". You either say it is from the Americas (which is probably what they meant) or you say North or South America.

      This is a particularly US-centric viewpoint that may be gaining some international traction by way of US cultural pressure, but it still has a long way to go to become the norm outside of the US itself.

      In Norway, "Amerika" (=America) is the name of the continent that stretches from the Antarctic to the Arctic. The use of the word "Amerikaene" (=the Americas) is basically non-existent. When we want to talk about the US specifically we mostly use "USA" with some having started to use "Amerika".

      People from the US are generally called "Amerikanere" (=Americans) which is perhaps the closest to the generalization we are at this point. We don't use this word for Canadians, Mexicans, etc., except occasionally in jest.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    23. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that was enough to split continents, that would be silly. I was being (somewhat annoyingly) pedantic, and I apologize for that. I stand by the rest of my points though.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    24. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Referring to the US as "America" is pretty much accepted by everyone other than pedants and people with an axe to grind .

      FTFY.

      "Accepted" by [some], and still perfectly wrong. I would say, accepted by the careless - by people who do not think before expressing themselves.
      Where does your definition of 'pedant' end?

    25. Re:"US" != "America" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not see how an inconsistency in your mental world of concepts can be accepted for "not being pedantic".

      'American refers to a nation',' American refers to a continent','The said nation and continent do not overlap': these three cannot stay together. How can you state 'I am American' and exclude Canadians and Peruvians? You should feel immediately that something is wrong upon stating (and would you say "Oh, well let's not be pedantic"?).

      I note and find acceptable the idea expressed above that the continent should be referred to as 'America_s_', which solves part of the problem, but does not solve 'American'.

      I do not see which fault tolerance mechanism you enact, logically, to be able to actually use 'American' for a citizenship, if not, as per tnk1 above, consciously knowing you are using a "shorthand".

  21. Re:Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Can't they get encryption software from Islamic paradises, like Malaysia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Emirates, Iran, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, et al?

    Nope. Software encryption can't overcome hardware designed weaknesses. So unless those countries start their own chip design and frabrication, they'll never truly protected.

  22. Encryption tools are not as safe as the vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encryption is not security-by-obscurity.
    It either works or doesn't.

    If you use some laughable closed-source solutions for encryption, then you are a total moron.

  23. Re:Thank you for your service ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's built into your culture.

  24. Like turkey and saudi arabia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >ISIS Supporters Abandon [...]
    Did they do a survey in turkey and saudi arabia?

  25. The FBI isn't desperate at all by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FBI must be desperate, trying to lump people who believe in security with terrorists...

    Not desperate. Just self interested and politically savvy. Accusing someone you oppose politically of being soft on or aligned with crime/terrorism is one of the oldest plays in politics. It's how we end up with absurd things like mandatory minimum and three strikes laws that do nothing to prevent crime. It's how we end up with a prison camp in Cuba, extraordinary rendition, torture, etc and the government doing nothing about it. Speak out against those things and you just feed ammo to your political enemies.

    The FBI wants their job to be as easy as possible. They'll pay lip service to observing the constitution but at the end of the day they'll take making their job easier over your civil rights every time.

    1. Re:The FBI isn't desperate at all by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Problem is, that tactic doesn't really work much anymore.

      The government, especially law enforcement, has shown time and again that they are corrupt, and evil, and do NOT have the citizens best interests at heart, so the public is getting more skeptical and these lazy tactics are becomes less and less effective...

  26. Re:Way to screw American Companies, FBI by PraiseBob · · Score: 2

    Its not just a loud warning horn to our enemies... It's a loud warning to all foreign companies, that data stored in the US, or protected by companies based in the US, may be intentionally weakened by our government someday in the future. It's an undisputed fact that many US based 3 letter agencies are actively seeking to break, route around, and weaken every encryption model they can, whether publicly, or secretly. This is absolutely driving away foreign business, and is going to hurt US business interests immensely in the long run, since foreign IT people can come to the same obvious conclusions on whether using broken encryption is a good idea for their business.

  27. Re:Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  28. Re:Can't roll their own? by wiredog · · Score: 1

    They did. Used it, too, until Snowden announced to the world that NSA had broken it.

  29. Re: Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fell for an idiot meme. almost anything is better than the popular SSL libraries. for example. We must assume these GPG and PGP hairballs are equally pwnable. Simply too complicated to be done correctly.

  30. Re:Way to screw American Companies, FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the Russkies are stupid enough to use Linux and the Chinese stupid enough to allow billions of ARM processors in their country, I say these anglo folks can do whatever they please. This world is too stupid to realize the strategic threat of "free trade".

  31. Promoting but for what purpose? by Shadow+IT+Ninja · · Score: 1

    So they are promoting some particular encryption tools but to whom and for what purpose? It doesn't make sense to endorse these particular encryption tools for high security purposes. Actual terrorists would want to add on extra encryption from a third party and not rely on any built-in encryption from any service or software. What does make sense is for ISIS supporters to promote these particular tools to the general public for two reasons. First, the more widespread strong encryption becomes, the less likely any particular message will be flagged as suspicious simply because it is encrypted. In other words, it helps to make the really sensitive data look less conspicuous. Second, this helps to counter the possibility that potential recruits will be detected as someone who could be radicalized before ISIS even has a chance to try and recruit them. In other words, it counters the thought police approach to anti-terrorism.

  32. Re:Can't roll their own? by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Not Geography, Achmet - just rattled off a list of Muslim countries from the top of my head, most of which have enough people supportive of ISIS

  33. going dark by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure, you can argue that the government insisting on crippling United States industry will only make United States corporations go dark and that unbreakable encryption is certainly a capability of industry outside the United States. But you are foolish if you do. That would simply allow the government to continue to pretend this is about ISIS. Clearly it isn't, it is about the government's war against its own citizens.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  34. Re:Can't roll their own? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    They can probably try adding that to a hadith, or a Reliance of the Traveller, or something from one of their zillion seminaries worldwide

  35. Re:Can't roll their own? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    They have Malaysia, which loves coming up w/ 'Islamic innovations' like the Proton car. So maybe they could have gotten the Malays to design and fab a chip that they could then use? Instead of relying on Infidel built chips?

  36. Best way of 'going dark' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is to keep your bloody mouth shut. Most of the things that people get caught out with on comms channels are things they really did not need to blab about.

  37. Re:Can't roll their own? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

    Canamerica?

  38. Citation Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ISIS is using cryptography again? I thought that that had already been debunked.

    How is it that we seem to know SO much about these people, their org charts, their daily operations... yet we can't seem to actually find any of them and instead indiscriminately bomb entire towns?

    I'm gonna need some citations with reputable sources on ISIS encryption selection and deployment processes.

  39. Obvious question is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't the FBI just get the CIA to give them the security keys for the phones that they are handing out to ISIS?

  40. Re: Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an American, you insensitive clod.

  41. non-American encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the American government cannot touch. Well.
    The FBI asked and American Corporation to decrypt something. It went public.
    Enough details were given in the media to cause people to begin to try to think.
    Including USAmericans.
    So there will (hopefully) be a large class of encryptions developed that aren't commonly known.
    Using techniques different from those the NSA/CIA/FBI mathematicians usually use...
    Algorithms not published.
    Maybe even keyless.
    Good!

  42. It's about time to tell the US to feck off by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    US acronym agencies like the CIA, NSA, FBI, IRS, etc. have had things their own way for far too long. It's made them lazy, incompetent and stupid.

    Remember the Secret Service yahoos who were too busy screwing Colombian whores to do their job? They're the tip of the iceberg. Now the FBI and the rest of the lazy bastards want back doors into every phone and computer on the planet because they refuse to do the hard, slow, dangerous work of infiltrating groups like ISIS, or turning existing members into willing and unwilling spies. They imagine they can snap their fingers and corporations like Apple will just roll over. And they imagine there won't be another hero like Phil Zimmermann around the next corner.

    Even worse, they believe they actually can control the whole world, and the real innovators won't simply set up beyond the reach of the US. There is a huge demand for genuinely secure computing that has nothing to do with terrorism, and everything to do with getting out from under the thumb of corrupt, evil governments in all the major multi-national trading blocs.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  43. Re:Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India gave us 0, not Arabia.

  44. Good luck by vovin · · Score: 1

    Finding an encryption scheme that isn't already backdoor'd by the CIA.
    AFAIK the US/CIA has corrupt deals with all the known for-profit crypto suppliers.

    http://mediafilter.org/caq/cry...
    https://www.schneier.com/blog/...

  45. Don't you just love the BS about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How The Snowden revelations did this or that bad thing to the economy or american security and we are just expected to believe it without proof, From the people who were revealed to be spying on us while at the same time saying to congress that they were not spying on us (Ahem! Looking at you Mr Clapper!)

    Do these idiots really expect us to believe them now that they have lied to us? Really?

  46. Re:Can't roll their own? by markdavis · · Score: 0

    No, there is no continent named "America." Perhaps you are thinking of one of the TWO continents that happen to contain the WORD "America", they are:

    North America
    South America

    "America", alone, is the standard and accepted common name of the USA.... which is why its citizens are called "Americans".

  47. Re:Can't roll their own? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    No, the Islamic State can only get good encryption technology from Israel.

  48. Re:Can't roll their own? by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quit it with your American exceptionalism, it is wrong headed and false, America categorically is referred in a different manner by the various countries and cultures stuck with sharing that land mass with citizens of the United States of America. That is a fact, quit with the bullshit of the United States of America and it's definitions of anything being the only one there is, go away with your childish spelling and stop with any kind of claims to intellectual dominance, you numb nuts can not even manage switching to metric, lead heads (not an insult a fact, not your fault, the fault of various corrupt players and their greed, dumbing down you nation by poisoning it, mind bogglingly still to this day and still not one arrest.)

    Of course if they were actually serious about terrorists, instead of just using it to implement the police state in a rich versus poor class war, they would fucking quit it with giving those terrorists a political identity to enable recruitment, this being perversely enough purposefully done by the military industrial complex to drive more fear and sell more war. They would simply call them crime gangs, with gang bosses, the crime gang would have no identity beyond being labelled as the crime gang of a particular crime boss and the various subordinate controllers. Members would not be political activist, they would simply pliable and gullible violent rapist minions, slaves to the greed of the gang bosses, nothing more than egoistic crime cults.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  49. FBI Director James Comey's long-held desire .. by tetraverse · · Score: 1

    translated: We're desperately afraid of ordinary people communicating privately and organizing politically, therefore we've decided to tarnish everyone we don't approve of with the terrorism moniker.

  50. The FBI must believe a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That lie is, "if you're not cheating, then you're not trying hard enough." It's the other way around because using maximum leverage all the time makes you weaker. You should only use maximum leverage when you absolutely need to. Using minimum leverage, as a matter of practice, makes you buff. But that's what they get for not thinking. NSA's same mentality.

    If the strong encryption is with those overseas and other countries in America, the FBI will have to relinquish the job to CIA, heh heh. Maybe they didn't want the job in the first place and that's why they're making such a strange decision?

    Please tell me there is *not* some alternative [un-American] motive here. Is this some big sympathy ploy? Surely not! Whether intentional or not, that's what it is in effect! Aren't we Americans sick of having our sympathies taken advantage of to the point that we can now overcome this kind of thing?! And that's our great weakness as a people. Instead, let's be empathetic and compassionate, but not struck down by foolish and inappropriate sympathy to the extent that we're willing to relinquish our rights! Please tell me the FBI is *not* intentionally and wittingly pulling some sort of disgusting sympathy ploy here; please tell me it's unintentional!

    As it stands, it sure looks like the commis have won, if the FBI is going to treat information with the same [dis-]regard as Big Mother/Brother Russia did in the Cold War. Remember, we -- the people of the true Republic of the United States of America -- own you F.B.I. You work for us.

    If you believe the lie, then all you have to do is DROP IT! and buff up.

  51. Re:Can't roll their own? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    That's true. The Arabs just transported knowledge from India & China to the Byzantine Empire, via the Silk Road. Also, a lot of the knowledge that they tout, such as al Khwarezmi (after whom the term 'Algebra' originated), was done at the cusp of the conversion of Iran from Zoroastrianism to Islam: al Khwarezmi was born Zoroastrian, and probably converted to Islam sometime in his life to avoid being bullied by the Samanids, who converted Iran to Islam. The only thing the 'scholars' of Islam came up w/ were the stupid compilations of the traditions of Mohammed - the hadiths, the tafseers and other junk that they invented. I didn't claim above that the Muslims invented 0, just that they claim to!!!

  52. Sure, they might abandon U.S. encryption by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    But they will never abandon U.S. Dollars

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  53. Re:Can't roll their own? by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Quite the rant. A little bit of it is actually accurate. But doesn't change the fact that the continent is not called "America" and that citizens of the USA are called "Americans".

    America redirects to "United States". Feel free to read the article, too, if you like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Here is "North America": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... And as a bonus, "South America": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    And also from the Wikipedia intro: "A continent is one of several very large landmasses on Earth. [...]These are (from largest in size to smallest): Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Antarctica, Europe, and Australia"

  54. GP is right. by gwolf · · Score: 1

    I understand the end of the comment perfectly in such a light. America is America's biggest problem — Read it several possible ways:

      The USA is most of Spanish-speaking countries biggest problem (because it creates a drug market and requires it to be stomped over at its production/transit places; because it imposes puppet, nondemocratic governments; because it distorts local economies; a very long etc.)
      The countries in our continent are the USA's biggest problem (because of migration, lets empower Trump to fight those illegals; because of cheap hand labor, the wages are kept artificially low; because of a very long etc.)

    Polysemy rules!

  55. Re: Can't roll their own? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

    We were teached differently where I live. In the school, the textbooks listed Central America as a continent on its own. We also were thought different divisions of the greater land masses: Old World, New World, The Newest Wold and the Cold Continent. The Americas could be considered a single continent: America. By the way, the distinction between the continents is somewhat arbitrary: why is Europe a continent of its own and not a part of Eurasia? Or why is Europe a continent, while India is a subcontinent?

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  56. Re: Can't roll their own? by Flavianoep · · Score: 2

    There is a continent called 'America': https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  57. ISIS Loves iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISIS is Apple biggest customer. Timmy Cook "Hearts" ISIS.

    ha ha

  58. Re: Can't roll their own? by markdavis · · Score: 1

    The concept of a continent is slightly arbitrary, but they are just large, mostly separate land masses.... so there are 6 of them (or 7 if you consider Greenland to be big enough, which few people do). I have never seen ANY reference to Central America being a continent... it is not large and certainly not separate, disconnected, or a distinct physical area. North and South America are, independently, very large, and highly disconnected.

    Europe is not a continent, neither is Asia. It is one land mass with no disconnect or border at all, and trying to pretend they are separate continents is purely a political/fantasy. The name for it is Eurasia. India is not a continent- but you could consider it a sub-continent because it is on a different techtonic plate. North America and South America are on different plates. Interestingly, although Central America is NOT a continent, it *is* on a separate plate (just like the Arabian area of the Eurasian Continent is on a separate plate).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  59. ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so it begins. The only folks left using broken security software will be the ones that the government is "trying to protect". All others will find or create trusted sources. First will pass the security and encryption specialty software, eventually OS market. I would really like the government to stop window licking.

  60. Bullshit by easyTree · · Score: 1

    You realise that this can be read outside the US where we aren't susceptible to US flavored fearmongering?

    "Today's privacy violation will be brought to you by the phrase 'because ISIS.'"

  61. Re:Can't roll their own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...] Or (gasp), even roll their own in their labs in Raqqa, Mosul, Sirte...

    Well given their 'lab' is a stinking shit-hole where they keep their camels and their women they are to busy raping both to get any work done. You know how it is.

  62. Yes it still works by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Problem is, that tactic doesn't really work much anymore.

    Like hell it doesn't. That tactic is why we have things like the Patriot Act. It's why we ended up in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's why we have this absurd and wasteful War on Drugs and the largest prison population in the world. (Hint, if our prison population is larger than China's then we are doing something wrong)

    Sorry but accusations of being soft on crime are extremely effective as a political tactic. The public demonstrably falls for them each and every time and there is no evidence to the contrary.

    1. Re:Yes it still works by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      The people are starting to recognize it as bullshit more and more however.

      The rabid nutjobs still gobble that crap up, but it's not the magic bullet it once was

  63. Re: Can't roll their own? by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Not on any map I have ever seen in my life. Combining the two continents of North America and South America would be just about as ridiculous and illogical as combining Africa and Eurasia.

  64. Re: Can't roll their own? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

    Not everything in this world follows logic. Too many maps will show Europe and Asia as two continents. By the way, if the maps you've seen come from the US, not identifying America as a single continent is not just for the sake of logic, it's didactics; there, the country is consistently called America after all!

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  65. Re: Can't roll their own? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

    I must have not taken enough attention when or the textbooks I had did not make it clear that they treated the three Americas as subcontinents that form America. It reads so in the Portuguese language Wikipedia article on Central America: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/América_Central.

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  66. Re:Can't roll their own? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    You immediately repeat the exact same american exceptionlism, my view was derived from an excellent article that actually spoke to various academic from the various countries that form the 'Americas' you of course point to en.wikipedia again and again, so yeah Spanish and Portuguese are also languages from the 'Americas' as are many original nation languages. Let's be blunt history emphatically proves you wrong, because members of the original nation refereed to the land mass in their own way for tens of thousands of years (by far the majority of human occupation of that region) and racist white protestant they are not foreigners in their own land. You are just selectively using you definition as dominant because it is yours and ignoring everyone else's especially those who held their views for tens of thousands of years. So theirs don't count because you killed enough of them so that they don't count?

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  67. Re:Can't roll their own? by markdavis · · Score: 1

    en.wikipedia is not usa.wikipedia, it is just English- the main language of many countries.

    You are waaaaay over the top.