Slashdot Mirror


McAfee Says He Lied About iPhone Hacking Method To Get Public Attention

blottsie writes: McAfee, who founded of one of the first companies to offer antivirus software, claimed on CNN and Russia Today, as well as in a Business Insider column, that he could bypass the advanced encryption protecting the phone without Apple's help. But he lied in these interviews, he said in an interview with the Daily Dot, to "get a shitload of public attention."

171 comments

  1. Yes by blueshift_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obviously. Move along.

    1. Re:Yes by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Translation from McAfeeSpeak:

      "I made it all up to sound big, bad, and awesome... but now with the FBI really interested in doing just that, well..."

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Yes by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ayup. The only thing noteworthy about the earlier press was the fact that he was being taken seriously, despite pulling stunts along these lines for years. The guy wants the spotlight and yearns to be seen as relevant. That time is long-since past, if it was ever here at all.

    3. Re:Yes by ISoldat53 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There goes his opportunity for a job with the FBI/DEA.

    4. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard NSA has a job open: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    5. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could say... 8) ...it was a false positive.

    6. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The attention is definitely necessary if his current presidential campaign wants to succeed!

    7. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had a recording of me at the time so it doesn't sound like hindsight and such, but when he made the claim my response was "always take everything he says with a giant grain of salt".

    8. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, because Americans have shown they have no problem voting for liars....

    9. Re:Yes by KGIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much. I think McAfee is awesome and we've got a few things in common - including a love of South America (and I'll leave it at that). However, he's a lunatic. We might also have that in common but my shrink assures me that I'm sane.

      At any rate... I've been earnestly asked why I'd not vote for him as president. At the time, I said (I was being polite) that I figured he should start with a lower office and demonstrate capability because he hadn't yet shown any capacity to be a politician. In hindsight, I should have said I couldn't vote for him, even if I wanted to, because the country shouldn't be run by lunatics.

      If you read this John, you're a great person and I'm in Florida right now - we should hang out and I'll be here until spring. But, seeing as you're reading this, I really can't support your candidacy 'cause you're a lunatic. Don't take that the wrong way, but you are. Live with it, revel in it, and shine on you crazy diamond. But no, no you can't be in charge of the country - yet. Start with governor or some small State or Senate or something. It's great to shoot for the moon but you don't have a shot in hell - 'cause you're a lunatic. We'll vote for a lunatic so long as they're a good (we think) and likable politician.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pretty much. I think McAfee is awesome and we've got a few things in common" == "we can both write a dos program that sequentially reads a file and do a pattern match." WOW! You are both awesome hackers!" Will return a non zero value.

    11. Re:Yes by Misagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That said. I trust him more than Donald Trump.

      At least McAfee came clean and admitted that he had been lying instead of trying to perpetuate the lie and throwing insults at anyone who questions him.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    12. Re:Yes by Darron_Wyke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hell. With his lovely little South American adventure, any sort of reputation he had before is gone. Not so much burned gone, but covered in napalm and salted-the-Earth-for-good-measure gone. Anything he does now is just an attention grab.

    13. Re:Yes by fred911 · · Score: 2

      "Start with governor or some small State or Senate or something." Screw that.

      John,
        It's time to man-up and buy a South American island in a country you can pay off to secede. Invite other like minded individuals, make passports, do it right!

      Some of us do understand (and even admire) the right to do and be as you care to, socially acceptable or not. Sounds a lot more sustainable and easier to keep the locals out of your pocket.

       

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    14. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep unfortunately he did something 20 years ago that still bore his name making him recognisable to the general public.

    15. Re:Yes by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      But at least Donald is conservative enough to stick with the tried and true nose candy of choice - cocaine. Unlike McAfee that does all that wacky zombifying bath salt shit; no thank you.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    16. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know he is honest now?

    17. Re:Yes by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      At least McAfee came clean and admitted

      That makes him unfit to hold office.

    18. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone else ever seen this "shrink" you speak of? Maybe had a conversation with BOTH of you at the same time? Or does your "shrink" really live inside your head and whisper bad things to you?

  2. Geez, what a shitload of opportunism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone take this shitload seriously from now on though, if ever anyone did?

  3. McAffee admits he did something to get attention by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aside from outright admitting it, what else is new?

  4. Douche by fnj · · Score: 1

    But we already knew that.

    1. Re:Douche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a great source of bath salts.

  5. President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    He should run for president if he is willing to lie so blatantly. Oh, looks like he already is.

    1. Re:President by supremebob · · Score: 5, Informative

      The big difference between him and most politicians is that he's willing to admit when he's lying. Someone like a Trump or a Clinton would just say that they were just being "misunderstood", or that the media "took them out of context".

    2. Re:President by lbmouse · · Score: 2

      And I was pulling for Vice-president Nugent under Trump, but we have a new horse in the race. Hold on tight! We are going from Cat-Scratch Fever to full on Bat-Shit Crazy.

    3. Re:President by gaelfx · · Score: 1

      This practice is referred to as "drumpfing." Or at least, it should be.

    4. Re:President by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Clinton - and most other politicians - claim to be "misunderstood", "taken out of context", or issue insincere apologies when they are called on outright lying. (As opposed to just twisting the truth.) Trump, on the other hand, doesn't seem to care if he lies or tells the truth. When he's caught on lying (e.g. saying he saw thousands of Americans celebrating on 9-11 as the towers came down), he doubles down and insists it's true because he says it is. If he says the sky is green with pink polka dots, it doesn't matter how often you point to the blue sky above you or show him photos, he'll keep insisting it is. For someone who claims to not be a politician, he out-politicians the politicians. (And that's not meant as a compliment.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He hasn't admitted to lying about murder

    6. Re:President by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Trump, on the other hand, doesn't seem to care if he lies or tells the truth. When he's caught on lying (e.g. saying he saw thousands of Americans celebrating on 9-11 as the towers came down), he doubles down and insists it's true because he says it is. If he says the sky is green with pink polka dots, it doesn't matter how often you point to the blue sky above you or show him photos, he'll keep insisting it is. For someone who claims to not be a politician, he out-politicians the politicians. (And that's not meant as a compliment.)

      He's a Narcissist. One of the hallmarks of someone with a Narcissistic personality disorder is that when they make a mistake, it's not their fault, it's the fault of the people around them. They make pretty good door-to-door salesmen since they don't take rejection personally. After all, if you reject their offer, it's YOUR fault for being stupid enough to reject them. Not their fault for selling a crappy product.

      A Narcissist is very good at projecting confidence, regardless of whether that confidence is backed up by competence or expertise. Human beings, maybe out of instinct, seem to value confidence as the most important leadership quality, not intelligence or a well-thought-out plan. Because of that, narcissists find themselves disproportionately in positions of power. Some are actually fairly good at it, but most aren't, which is one reason why there are so many horrible, "how did this person become a manager?" sorts of bosses.

      So sure, Trump doubles down on the untruth. And he never acknowledged that -he- made a mistake, only that someone else made the actual mistake. For instance, he repeatedly claimed that he was repeating the findings of a reporter who had mentioned this in a story. But when you read the actual story, the only reference is one police officer who said there was an unverified claim that someone had made saying there was a tailgate-style party on a rooftop. That's the only police report -- that they had heard a rumor and were going to check it out. Nothing came of it, though we do have many, many reports from officers who said they never saw anything like that in various cities of New Jersey. Of course, Trump immediately said "I want an apology! Many people have tweeted that I am right!" He can't be wrong, he's too smart to be wrong. Everyone else is the dumb one for trying to mislead him.

      Ben Carson did the same thing, saying "he saw" celebrations in New Jersey. Then when he was called out on it, he said that he said the celebrations he saw were "overseas" and that the media had an agenda in misreporting what he said. Even though he's on record for specifically saying that he saw the celebrations over 9/11 taking place in New Jersey. But he doesn't have the brash forceful confidence that Trump has, so he didn't really get anywhere with it.

    7. Re:President by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Ben Carson did the same thing, saying "he saw" celebrations in New Jersey. Then when he was called out on it, he said that he said the celebrations he saw were "overseas"...

      Well, technically "New Jersey" and "overseas" are not always contradictory. /s

    8. Re:President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >(e.g. saying he saw thousands of Americans celebrating on 9-11 as the towers came down)

      It was true you SJW faggot. I remeber that day and remeber the papers and the TV news reporting the same thing: Muslims in NY celebrating.

      Secondly I have been told first hand accounts of the same.

      Muslims celebrated in NYC when the towers came down.

  6. So, he's a lying asshole... by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't understand why he's not as popular as Trump, Sanders, or Clinton. He's doing the same things they are!

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Funny

      We expect politicians to lie. Geeks, not so much (well, unless they're also vendors, but...)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's a politician now. Not a good one, he shouldn't have admitted it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's John McAfee. Okay, so maybe it was believable; but if you're honestly surprised by the follow-up, you haven't been paying attention. This is a guy who posted a video on Youtube where he talked about banging underaged girls and smoked a bunch of meth.

      McAfee isn't out to defraud people; he's just out to be a loud caricature. I'm sure some day he'll say something serious in a sensational and ridiculous way; I'm equally sure he'll keep saying things that sound serious and then turn out to be just noise, because that's what he does now. He doesn't get attention because people believe him; he gets attention because he's interposed himself into a situation and drawn attention to himself, and we all recognize the act. You *can* play off that act honestly, but it's not a requirement.

    4. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can't understand why he's not as popular as Trump, Sanders, or Clinton. He's doing the same things they are!

      -jcr

      Do NOT put Sanders in the same category as Hillary Clinton.

      Hell, I don't agree with Trump but even he's not the untrustworthy pathological lying sack of shit that Hillary Clinton is.

    5. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lumping Sanders in with Trump and Clinton is naive.

    6. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the FUCK can you put Sanders into the same category as Trump or even Hillary when it comes to honesty!?

    7. Re: So, he's a lying asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murdering people and hiding from a warrant? I guess it's possible.

    8. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Can't understand why he's not as popular as Trump, Sanders, or Clinton. He's doing the same things they are!

      -jcr

      They're experts at selling the lie.
      McAfee is an amateur in comparison.

    9. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      How the FUCK can you put Sanders into the same category as Trump or even Hillary when it comes to honesty!?

      They're politicians.
      A varan might be different from a crocodile and an alligator, but you still don't want to hand your baby over for a kiss.

    10. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Can't understand why he's not as popular as Trump, Sanders, or Clinton. He's doing the same things they are!

      -jcr

      He admitted he was lying. Not only is that not the same thing as Trump Sanders or Clinton, but that's an outright assault on the character of the public office itself.

    11. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my sweet summer child. Of course Sanders is better than all the rest. He's not a vicious warmonger at all. I mean, he voted against bombing kosovo, right? He has never been involved in any electoral fraud at all, has he? He always tells the truth and never panders in order to get more votes. He's totally different.

    12. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do NOT put Sanders in the same category as Hillary Clinton.

      Fuck you. Bernie is a lying commie rat bastard, and if you support him, you're an idiot.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:So, he's a lying asshole... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do you have a pet Unicorn?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  7. impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A narcissistic jerk lying for attention? What is this world coming to? Next up we'll hear that some useless Hollywood slut has publicly posted nudes to get in the headlines again!

    1. Re:impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or someone like that running for President -and doing well at it!

  8. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by NotInHere · · Score: 5, Informative

    He is trying to get attention by being honest? That's brand new it seems.

  9. McAfee Says He Lied About iPhone Hacking Method To by DeathToBill · · Score: 2

    No. Shit.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  10. Shocked by Caitlin2013D · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on McAfee lied here!

    1. Re:Shocked by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      "Here are your winnings for the evening, Mr. McAfee."

  11. Maybe he's lying about lying to get attention by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    And so he really can crack the iPhone's security.

    1. Re:Maybe he's lying about lying to get attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he's lying about lying to get attention, and he's really lied because he honestly beleived it at the time? :D

  12. My faith in humanity is RUINED! RUINED I say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I can't believe everything John McAfee says, there's no point in living!

    1. Re:My faith in humanity is RUINED! RUINED I say! by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      He once said that the anti-virus software that currently bears his name is crap, so he's not wrong all the time.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  13. News for ... nerds? by eyenot · · Score: 2

    Now, if you were *really* going to be a genius at getting in a snarky comment to make yourself seem intelligent, you'd go back in time to the article where his now-disavowed claims were originally covered, and you'd post all about how you know it's a lie from the outset, rather than boost yourself up in hindsight.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:News for ... nerds? by KGIII · · Score: 2

      Err... I actually remember the Slashdot thread. Other than some who haven't got a clue or refuse to get a clue, everyone that opined said he was full of shit. I think my dog even farted upon hearing the news. I believe that the majority even speculated that he was saying it for attention.

      So, you might be right? People might want to refer back to the original thread and point out that they were witty and just knew it was a hoax, and for attention, all along. Of course, that'd not be much better than me speculating that Trump's going to say something to piss off the Democrats in his second-to-next campaign speech. I'd probably be right, but I sure as hell won't be intelligent for having said so and being right.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  14. He can't even get the pronunciation of his own nam by HeyBob! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mc-Afee not MAC-A-fee

  15. Now hold on a minute. by idbeholda · · Score: 2

    That iPhone might be infected with the Michelangelo virus.

    1. Re:Now hold on a minute. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      That iPhone might be infected with the Michelangelo virus.

      hack the planet

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Now hold on a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was the Da Vinci virus
      Michelango was a real virus from a few decades ago

    3. Re:Now hold on a minute. by idbeholda · · Score: 1

      That's the joke.

  16. In other news... by stazeii · · Score: 2

    Your dog wants steak.

    1. Re:In other news... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "Dog lies to get steak," now that would be news.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. He's probably surprised people take him seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  18. Re:McAfee Says He Lied About iPhone Hacking Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, water confesses to being wet, Obama swears Guantanamo is going to close, and Donald Trump says something stupid!

  19. And much like Donald Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the only question people have isn't actually whether or not he's telling the truth, but why people would put their faith in him in the fucking first place.

    They're both human caricatures at BEST. What are John McAfee's accomplishments at this point? Being on the run from a murder charge in Belize, being hooked on bath salts and lying his face off only to admit it was for a "shitload" of publicity a few days later. On the antivirus product that bears his own last name, he himself has said that it's so useless and irritating that it's one of the first things he uninstalls.

    The whole reason anyone seems to even pay attention to McAfee is that he demands it from them, he doesn't have anything worthwhile to say. He doesn't have some hacker think-tank at his disposal as he implies (I'm guessing that was a desperate bid to get the attention of someone in #anonops). He doesn't have anything to add to the discussion besides his presence, which I'm sure he charges quite a reasonable rate for. He's a drugged out, damaged lunatic. You meet plenty of them on the street every day to work depending on where you live, yet I doubt that level of familiarity would leave you to trust them to decrypt an iPhone. You probably wouldn't trust them to tie their own shoes.

    1. Re: And much like Donald Trump... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      why people would put their faith in him in the fucking first place

      He's an eccentric, deviant asshole in a very refreshing sort of way and his talking points appeal to critical thinking (as opposed to Trump's, which are clearly right out of Mein Kampf)...

    2. Re: And much like Donald Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...the fact that you describe a person's being a "deviant asshole" as being "refreshing," while simultaneously admitting to being the sort of person who reads Mein Kampf...I'm sure you'd be fun at a party if you were ever actually invited.

    3. Re: And much like Donald Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, someone that can pull "refreshing" out from a walking shenanigan like McAfee does sound like someone I might enjoy the company of. Everyone takes everything too seriously.

      Though, going McAfee-grade lax would be the opposite problem.

  20. Gasoline on the Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great a "successful rich dude" running his mouth, trivializing a technology issue that he is supposedly an expert on. So now we have more dangerous idiots like Donald Trump running for president and thinking they are being righteous by attacking Apple in no small part due to the distorted flamebait coverage that was presented as news what two weeks ago? Great.

    Mr McAfee you have made this nation less safe with your poor representation of the facts. Way to go.

    1. Re:Gasoline on the Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playboy
      plboi/
      noun
      noun: playboy; plural noun: playboys

      a wealthy man who spends his time enjoying himself, especially one who behaves irresponsibly or is sexually promiscuous.

      That's what he is, and kudos to him.

  21. Get the details straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the FBI wants access to the phone. There is no "advanced encryption" involved. What they cannot do is try PINs because of the feature that erases the data if too many wrong PINs are entered. What is needed is a (what Apple is calling a new operating system - a truth statement hiding a lie) IOS update that would (1) disable the erase function and/or set the PIN entry to off or a known value, shut off WiFi and Bluetooth, and (3) auto install and reboot the phone - no "an IOS update has been downloaded, install now/later" prompt. Basically using the back door that Apple currently uses to push updates.

    Given source code and the details of IOS update process, any programmer could probably do it.

    In fact, there is no reason Apple is not already using that backdoor to install software or extract user personal data now - except they say so.

    1. Re:Get the details straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Just jail break the phone, and replace the code that you want.

      Also, on this model, there is no secure section of the chip for holding the key & code, so dump the flash and restore it when needed for more tries.

    2. Re: Get the details straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, please get the details straight. Entering the wrong pin too many times DOESN'T DO ANYTHING to the data. It causes the encryption key to be overwritten. If you don't even understand that, you don't have anything intelligent to add to this conversation.

  22. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by dysmal · · Score: 1

    That's because he's running for president!

  23. Called it by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Called it

    I thought McAfee's position was more along the lines of "Look at me! Look at me!" with the idea that he could say any old shit, get the attention he craves and then not have to deliver anything as no-one in their right mind would let him near that phone.

    Not that it was particular hard to call.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Congratulations! Here is your prize: A big, shiny trophy

  24. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He is trying to get attention by being honest? That's brand new it seems.

    He is being honest about being dishonest!? Is that a redeeming attribute? - confused-

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  25. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    Aside from outright admitting it, what else is new?

    At least he didn't kill anyone this time.

    We hope

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  26. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Better than getting it by killing his neighbors.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  27. So his coders are shit must be why the software is by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    So his coders are shit must be why the software is so slow.

  28. What he really got, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    was "a batshitload of public attention".

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  29. it's not personal attention that he wants by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    he's trying to bring attention to the issue, that the FBI is trying to fool everyone into thinking they cannot crack an iphone.

    “That video, on my YouTube account, it has 700,000 views. My point is to bring to the American public the problem that the FBI is trying to [fool] the American public. How am I going to do that, by just going off and saying it? No one is going to listen to that crap.

    “So I come up with something sensational,” he continued. “Now, what I did not lie about was my ability to crack the iPhone." ...

    Later in the interview, McAfee described his method, which involves “decapping” the phone’s processor and acquiring the device’s unique identifier (UID), that may allow someone to brute force the phone’s password

    he's not wrong either. a grad student explained this in a blog post from October 2014.

    Why Apple's iPhone encryption won't stop NSA (or any other intelligence agency)
    excerpt from the post:

    If Apple did their job properly, however, the UID (device encryption key) is completely inaccessible to software and is locked up in some kind of on-die hardware security module (HSM). This means that even if Eve is able to execute arbitrary code on the device while it is locked, she must bruteforce the passcode on the device itself - a very slow and time-consuming process.

    In this case, an attacker may still be able to execute an invasive physical attack. By depackaging the SoC, etching or polishing down to the polysilicon layer, and looking at the surface of the die with an electron microscope the fuse bits can be located and read directly off the surface of the silicon.

    Since the key is physically burned into the IC, once power is removed from the phone there's no practical way for any kind of self-destruct to erase it. Although this would require a reasonably well-equipped attacker, I'm pretty confident based on my previous experience that I could do it myself, with equipment available to me at school, if I had a couple of phones to destructively analyze and a few tens of thousands of dollars to spend on lab time. This is pocket change for an intelligence agency.

    Once the UID is extracted, and the encrypted disk contents dumped from the flash chips, an offline bruteforce using GPUs, FPGAs, or ASICs could be used to recover the key in a fairly short time.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:it's not personal attention that he wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he would have gotten more views if the video was of a kitten randomly pawing at and unlocking an IPhone then saying it's so easy even a kitten can do it.

    2. Re:it's not personal attention that he wants by Prune · · Score: 1

      This sort of attack can be defeated by sealing the IC together with a small battery in a package that acts as a physical interlock and triggers key erasure when breached. This is not hard to do, actually. For example, you can use tiny optical fibres throughout the body of the package. It would not be possible to breach and insert a bridge quickly and accurately enough to avoid making a significant disruption in the reading of a sensitive photosensor. When used in a device, a warning would be provided to the user if the battery charge is running too low, which would eventually also trigger erasure.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    3. Re: it's not personal attention that he wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't this the plot of Mission Impossible 14?

  30. Re:So his coders are shit must be why the software by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Adobe writes the shit software, and they own the trademark. He disavowed their software a long time ago and has nothing to do with making it.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  31. Trump / McAfee 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should make this guy President and give him his own unreality show!(*)

    (*) see what I did there with the subject line?

    1. Re:Trump / McAfee 2016! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Bad operand types for binary operators. First type: string, second type string and integer.

    2. Re:Trump / McAfee 2016! by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      data PublicityStrumpet = Trump | McAfee Integer
      instance Fractional PublicityStrumpet where { ... }

      Problem solved!

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  32. WHAT!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'M SHOCKED!

  33. It's not a lie by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    It's not a lie when stated in a uber-confident drug induced stupor. McAfee is a master of this state of being. He's not a liar, just an asshole.

  34. What exactly did he lie about? by Theovon · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. From the stories, he claimed to able to crack the iPhone without Apple's help. Then he said he lied about that. But then reaffirmed that his people would be able to crack the iPhone.

    What am I missing?

  35. It's A False Flag Double Cross Reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His admission is a false flag double cross reversal.

    He wanted to draw the FBI's attention away from Apple, but doesn't want them to know that he can totally hack the shit out of iPhones with social engineering. So he:

    1. Claims he can hack the shit out of iPhones with social engineering.
    2. Gets attention from the world and its dog.
    3. Tell the FBI it was totes a lie.
    4. ????
    5. Bath salts.

  36. Re:He can't even get the pronunciation of his own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans have long been free to invent their own pronunciations of their names. Just ask Coh-lin Powell, for example.

  37. The search for Trump's running mate is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Admittedly Scar, Pennywise, or Joffrey Baratheon would better fill in the gaps in Trump's "skills", but they're all dead....and also fictional, though that distinction doesn't seem to stop the Trump train.

  38. except.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the whole point of the FBI query is so they can maintain a legal chain of evidence in extracting the data. Everyone KNOWS the NSA can crack this by disassembling the hardware, but that method is not admissible in court.

    1. Re:except.. by shawn2772 · · Score: 2

      the whole point of the FBI query is so they can maintain a legal chain of evidence in extracting the data. Everyone KNOWS the NSA can crack this by disassembling the hardware, but that method is not admissible in court.

      Cite?

      I see absolutely no reason that disassembling the hardware breaks the chain of evidence. Said disassembly just has to be done by experts who will testify to the steps they used to extract the data and that the device was not out of their control. The NSA might not want to testify to the means used, I suppose, but I don't see why not because this is a really straightforward process. It requires specialized skills and tools, but nothing not present in many university research labs.

      1. Remove the flash chips and connect them to a controller to copy the contents (which are encrypted).
      2. Remove the CPU, and shave off the cladding to expose the silicon wafer inside.
      3. Shave layers of silicon off to expose the non-volatile storage containing the key (likely micro fuses, which are relatively large compared to other features).
      4. Use an electron microscope to read out the key bits.
      5. Combine all possible passwords with the key bits in the manner done by Apple's software to produce all possible candidate encryption keys.
      6. Perform trial decryptions of the data obtained in step 1 with all of the keys to see which one works. Or Apple may have another mechanism to determine if the key is correct[1].

      There's nothing here that requires secret knowledge, and nothing that would somehow break the chain of custody. Before you can do this on the target phone you need to do it on a few others so you can identify the location of the key in the silicon. After you're done, you may also need to make some information theoretic arguments about the possibility that you screwed up and found something that wasn't the key but still produced plaintext that looked like actual data. Those are very easy.

      So, no, this isn't about chain of evidence. For that matter, it's unlikely that any data on the device would ever be used to prosecute anyone anyway. The (purported) goal here is to get leads that may identify other conspirators, and if that were to happen it would almost certainly be other evidence, found as a result of following those leads, that would be used to prosecute the other conspirators. The "fruit of the poisoned tree" issue that comes up with illegally obtained information wouldn't apply, because the leads wouldn't be illegally obtained. There are no legal obstacles to the FBI extracting whatever they can get out of this phone.

      [1] A common technique to determine whether the password-derived key is the correct one is to store a secure hash of the derived key alongside the encrypted data. This makes it easy to check whether the derived key is the correct one, but unless the hash is broken to the point of being reversible doesn't provide an attacker with significant information about the key, especially if the hash space is significantly smaller than the keyspace (e.g. 32-bit hash of a 256-bit key). Android device encryption uses this technique to check if your entered password was correct.

    2. Re:except.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.... what court case? The "defendants" are dead.

    3. Re:except.. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Everyone KNOWS the NSA can crack this by disassembling the hardware, but that method is not admissible in court.

      Why wouldn't it be? Here's a process that should allow any untrustworthy idiot to crack the phone while having no risk of false data:
      1) Copy the hard drive, being careful to maintain chain of custody
      2) Let random untrustworthy person crack the phone
      3) Use decryption key to decrypt copy of hard drive from evidence locker

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:except.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you prove that the evidence was not altered if the original is destructed? Is there a true copy that can be tested? If you destructed a phone, what's to stop you from creating an encrypted drive with planted information? Unscrupulous people could just swap your seized phone with an altered one and find proof that you murdered X,Y and Z.

    5. Re:except.. by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      That problem has existed for as long as it's been possible to bear false witness. It's been such a pervasive problem that it's been codified into laws since we put them to tablet and papyrus. Just because you can *also* do it with the contents of a flash drive doesn't make it anything new.

    6. Re:except.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't you need some independent verification that the methods used to decrypt the phone were accurate and repeatable before it could be accepted as evidence?

    7. Re:except.. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      You can check that the results are correct; that is even better than proving the method you used to get the results are sufficiently accurate or repeatable.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    8. Re:except.. by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      How do you prove that the evidence was not altered if the original is destructed?

      Testing a DNA sample is also destructive, as are many other forensic tests. The key is that you have a disinterested technician performing the analysis, documenting each step in the process, and later testifying about it. If necessary, you can also keep recordings of the whole process, and subject those to chain-of-custody rules. If you really, really want to be careful, you allow the defense to provide their own expert witness who observes the entire process.

      In addition, the process I described specifically does not destroy the original. The flash chips with the original encrypted data are intact, and so is the shaved CPU with visible microfuses. A defense expert can actually reconstruct the extraction and decryption process. There's still the possibility that the bits you read out of the CPU actually weren't the key but some other random thing, which is where those information-theoretic arguments I mentioned come in.

      This is actually pretty easy to make ironclad, completely challenge-proof, and the fundamental ideas are no different from those used in any forensic analysis.

  39. Re:He can't even get the pronunciation of his own by KGIII · · Score: 1

    That's right. I pronounce my name as "Supreme Ruler of the Universe and Beyond, bow when You Gaze Upon Me" and anyone who pronounces it as "David" is wrong!

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  40. You can't social engineer the dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said he was going to get it via social engineering. How was he going to social engineer the passcode from a dead guy anyways?

  41. Re:Yes or No? by Trevelyan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe he's got the FBI job, and the first order of business is to discredit the possibility of being able to hack into an iPhone.

    I am surprised by how accepting the /. community is of the 'fact' that he was indeed lying.


    On a less factious note: In the days when iPhones had exploitable boot loaders, one could boot a version IOS in RAM, that let you brute force the PIN as long as you wanted to without wiping the phone. On iPhone 4 it took about 29 minutes to try all 4-digit combinations from 0000 to 9999. (The default PIN length at the time)

    The only two things stopping you today from still doing this is: 1) the lack of a known vulnerability in the boot loader, thus requiring your "Special IOS" to be signed by Apple; and 2) changes to the H/W crypto chip in new models that force longer and longer time outs before you can try another PIN.
    Although retries get longer, I don't think there is any limit set, in hardware, on how many retries you can have (yet); that's still handled by IOS.

  42. Hmm, I wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this announcement is to also, Bogus..

    the cross to the double cross?

    I personally think it's a ploy.

    John is not dumb.

    This does not sound like a plausible explanation..

    Or, maybe he got a offer he could not refuse..

    "Everyone" has something they cant refuse.

     

  43. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by Kjella · · Score: 1

    He is being honest about being dishonest!? Is that a redeeming attribute? - confused-

    No, that simply makes you an incompetent liar.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  44. I don't buy it by mark-t · · Score: 1

    As an admitted liar, how can we possibly trust him enough to believe that he lied?

  45. me, I'm going with "Max Power" by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    He should pull a Prince[*] and change his name to : !


    [*] curses, foiled again by /.'s lousy Unicode support!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:me, I'm going with "Max Power" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:me, I'm going with "Max Power" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeb:{

  46. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife doesn't buy that either.

  47. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Which puts him on par with all the other people running for president. Anyone seeking the US presidency should by default be disqualified and thoroughly investigated by the IRS, and the FBI.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  48. you know, 'cuz he's KOOK KOO... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    As I've told you before, social engineering the passcode wouldn't seem hard IF you think you have a TIME MACHINE.


    Knowing McAfee, it would probably be in his hot tub.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  49. Circular Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John McAfee: "Everything I say is a lie!"

    But if everything he says is a lie, then his statement is a lie. Except we know it's the truth so, then all his statements are lies, resulting in...

    Stack overflow. Error 0xFe03009C

    Head explodes.

  50. In good company! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

    He's in good company, as it's quite obvious the FBI is also lying about this being only "about one phone", "cyber pathogens" (whatever that is...), and has even admitted that there is probably nothing of use on the phone. They claim it's only for this one phone, but the FBI also claimed they never surveilled Martin Luther King Jr either until Congress drug it out of them almost 10 years later. This court order is only for this one phone, but there is no assurance that there won't be multiple "writs" after this, from the FBI and every other law enforcement agency in the US. The shooters made a point to destroy their personal phones; if there was anything on this phone it too would have been destroyed.

    Apple's only way out is to change their system so that what the FBI is asking for is impossible from here forward.

  51. I don't buy it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine what really happened was that he was visited by a bunch of men in black suits ready to cart him away to break iPhones for the government. Naturally he did not want to do that so is now lying.

    BTW My 17 year old broke into my locked iPhone in 2.5 hours this past weekend.

    1. Re:I don't buy it... by Beavertank · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure that's it. That's not at all a baseless paranoid assertion, no no, YOU are the sane one it's everyone else that's crazy. Right?

  52. But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he's lying about lying about lying to make us believe he's lying, when the truth is plainly obviously.
    People who lie about lying are used to having people not trust them, as they are not trusted by me,
    so I can clearly not choose the lie before me. But which one?

    IT HAS WORKED! YOU'VE GIVEN EVERYTHING AWAY! I KNOW WHERE THE LIE IS!

    - Vizzini

  53. Re:So, he's a lying [bleep]hole... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Bet: If Ted and Marco are honest, I'll install Windows 10.

  54. So it has come to this by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Oh I have to hang my head in mourning. It sure is a sad day.

    McAfee is now as useful and trustworthy as the product carrying his name.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  55. Clever girl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McAfee isn't looking to unlock a phone, he's attention whoring to see if he can get onto Trump's ticket as VP. Trump want's someone like him, but with worldly experience. A good bullshitter and self-marketer is his perfect match, he just needs someone with a little less crazy than the bitch from Alaska. And in steps McAfee...

    1. Re:Clever girl... by Beavertank · · Score: 1

      McAfee is just as nutty as Sister Sarah, if not possibly more. Palin just dresses up her stupid craziness in the right anti-media anti-establishment buzzwords so it appeals to the GOP voter base.

  56. Pavlov respons to the accusation of lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here it seems journalistic uberfailure is hidden by an accusation. If you are upset about the lie you have not payed attention. This 'journalist' has zero intergity, it is an exercise in vanity, it's like he expects John McCaffee to give him something interesting.

    I would have hung up much sooner, as soon as the dishonest questions of veracity started. You don't ask someone for the weather and then say 'but can I trust you?' When looking at a shared reality there is no trust required, McCafee doesn't want your trust in his word, he wants you to open your eyes to the risks to your life.Fire that guy.

  57. Begs the question... by Beavertank · · Score: 1

    So why does anyone even give John McAfee an interview anymore, let alone write about the bullshit he spews in those interviews? The man is an endless fountain of bullshit, and his grasp of reality seems tenuous at best these days.

  58. Re:He can't even get the pronunciation of his own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure it's pronounced "mal-ware."

  59. Lying to get attention? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Why isn't he running for president??? He's in the wrong line of work!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  60. No way! by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

    The guy who said he was going to break in via social engineering when the only people who know the passcode are dead was lying? Wow. Never saw that coming.

  61. hehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he wants to go to prison for perverting the course of the justice... under terrorism laws, in guantanamo...

  62. He's just trying to save face by Andrio · · Score: 1

    I think that he did think he knew how to break into an iPhone. But then after his interview, he found out that breaking into a modern mobile device is not the same as breaking into a computer back in the 80s and 90s, so he's just trying to save face.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  63. McAfee is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McAfee should have just stayed in seclusion. The guy is the founder of McAfee security. One of the most pathetic security software suites of all time. Come to think of it, Intel has nothing with McAfee security either.

  64. Don't worry : by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

    Nobody believed a word of it ^_^

    --
    Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
  65. In other McAfee news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's announced that he's ready to fight Mike Tyson.

  66. RTFA, the slash story is 100% wrong by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    He says he simplified the method so a stupid reporter could understand some of it.

  67. Re:Yes or No? by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the newest iPhones (A7 processor and newer), the Secure Enclave enforces the rules. This is a coprocessor chip with code baked in during manufacture and is implicitly trusted. It also has the AES-256 algorithm and key that protects the storage. The key is locked in the silicon with no way to extract it; the chip manufacturer doesn't keep it and Apple never has it. In order to access the encrypted storage, the request must pass through the SE. The class keys that are used are derived from the baked-in key and the passcode. 10 invalid passcode attempts and the chip will erase the encryption keys.

    For a much better description, read this: https://www.apple.com/business... starting from page 10.

    For the San Bernadino killers' iPhones, they have older iPhones where this is logic part of the iOS software. Therefore, a change to iOS is capable of altering the 10-strikes rule on their devices, and that's what the FBI is asking Apple to do. Had the murderers been using an iPhone 6 (or maybe even the iPhone 5S) not even Apple would be able to break them. The only options I see there might be physically dissecting the chip and somehow reading the bits from the flash storage in the chip. That's been done on the older, unsophisticated chips like those found in credit cards, but I've never heard of a researcher able to read data from the nanometer-scale chips in use in the Apple CPUs. Maybe the NSA has someone in house who could do that, but we civilians have no way of knowing what goes on in those labs.

    --
    John
  68. read as.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once his hacker buddies sobered up from binging on coke and meth and anything else paid for by their best bud's fortune, they told john.. 'hey bud, sorry to disappoint. but that's impossible without apple's help''

  69. Must be related to Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds a lot like what Donald trump is doing. Making stuff up for attention.

  70. Re:But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly there's bath salts in both cups.

  71. Ah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the perfect crime.

  72. So, no more valueless posts about him then? by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    Why does he even get a mention on /. if everything that comes out of his mouth is suspect?

  73. Re:Yes or No? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't they just pull out the hard drive and brute force it?

  74. Re:He can't even get the pronunciation of his own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No, no, no, it's spelled, 'Raymond Luxury Yacht', but it's pronounced 'Throat Warbler Mangrove'."

  75. Re:Yes or No? by tlambert · · Score: 4, Informative

    Therefore, a change to iOS is capable of altering the 10-strikes rule on their devices, and that's what the FBI is asking Apple to do.

    Yes. Except one thing.

    Loading a recovery image requires putting the device in *Recovery Mode*, and that's a hardware DFU mode whereby you talk to a small piece of firmware whose only job is to overwrite the Flash contents.

    It doesn't load shit into RAM and run it in order to overwrite the flash contents while preserving data: it's a *RECOVERY* mode, not an *UPDATE* mode. It's what you do as a last resort, assuming you backed your crap up to the iCloud, because if you didn't, that shit is *gone*.

    To do an *UPDATE* without overwriting the user data portion of the flash contents, you talk to the *ptpd*, which implements the DFU protocol at a higher level, in user space. How do you do that? Well, first, you have to make the ptpd willing to talk to you (or iTunes). How you you do that?

    You UNLOCK the frigging phone.

    So to load the image that the FBI wants Apple to write for them, and then to load, you'd have to unlock the phone to enable you to unlock the phone.

    Cluebat here. Knock knock knock... is that you, head? Yeah, there's two DFU implementations in the iPhone. What? You didn't know that? Well now you do. Yeah. Yeah. We can write the image you want us to write, and then we can load it onto the iPhone, but to do that, it will wipe out the very data you seek. What? No, we can't make monkeys fly out our ass... I think you are confusing us with Jim Carrey in that movie "Bruce Almighty".

    People really do not understand technology... especially technology designed to prevent exactly the type of thing the FBI wants done.

  76. Re:Yes or No? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Can't they just pull out the hard drive and brute force it?

    How much time have you got, because you are talking a 256 bit AES key that uses a UUID in the processor and a GID for the device model and a PIN from the user to generate there... You can fake the GID, but good luck on that whole UUID thing... you left that behind when you pulled the flash chip out of the device that had the processor the UUID lives in.

  77. McAfee is a super genius! Y'all are just haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and haters gotta hate. Or so goes the saying.

    Listen, McAfee didn't snort half a kilo of coke and Xanax off a Malaysian hooker's ass and go on a vision quest to find the Spear of Destiny to ultimately defeat Satan and ISIS, just to be made fun of by the likes of Slashdot. Me and McAfee are leaving, and we're taking this eight ball with us. #ImWithMcAfee

  78. Drone strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone spend 10 seconds of my tax dollars and drone-strike this fucking crackhead?

  79. Imagine if by trawg · · Score: 1

    ... the press stopped reporting the shit said by people that have been busted lying publicly.

  80. Re:McAffee admits he did something to get attentio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he's lying about lying. He really thought he could hack the iPhone, but when he realized that everyone thought his approach was BS, he decided to claim that he was just lying to get attention.

  81. what was Apple tryingz to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supposed to encrypt only your bzip'd tarball home directory, not make the entirw mountpoint unusable. Itis as though Syria sent someone into the semi-conductor industry to assure computer hardware developments to mirror the terrorist activities of immigrangs and non-native Apple customers... what is to be expected with this k ind of software underhandedness? People dont hide gardening and food recipe secrets this way...they put the secrets in plain sight where others would not understand. Apple is just another extension of a foreign military presence. Just call me out on this: how does this level of so-call security change the habbits of Apple customers-owners-

    1. Re: what was Apple tryingz to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is more concerned about the PR hit when some celebrity gets their iPhone compromised and their nudes get sold to the tabloids than whatever paranoid fantasy you have going.

  82. In other words, he's the Donald Trump of IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, he's the Donald Trump of IT.

  83. Libel/slander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so close to being libel or slander... I might say he defamed Apple by claiming he can crack the iPhone.

    1. Re:Libel/slander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using his 1st amendment right, the little git, too!

  84. I'm shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, come on. This guy has history of being mentally stable, producing top notch products that have never trashed anybody's PC on install (and certainly not mine, I mean unless you count the literal entire week I had to spend restoring over 4 dozen workstations that time in 2004 after an "important upgrade" to our McAfee AV program that utterly trashed them...ahh good times), never being involved in any kind of homicide, and certainly being someone you'd be comfortable letting your children be around.

    In all seriousness, put this mentally ill fuck in a padded room and the world will be a safer place.

  85. Re:Yes or No? by plover · · Score: 2

    No. Brute force has limits.

    The storage is in Flash RAM, not a hard drive, but they can probably get a copy of the encrypted data. That's not a problem.

    What is a problem is that AES-256 has no known weaknesses for this kind of situation. AES-256 in this case means the key is exactly one random number between 0 and 2 to the 256th power (2^256). That's not just a big number, that's a mind-blowingly big number. kIf every molecule in the entire universe was an advanced supercomputer capable of testing a billion billion keys per second, and had been testing every second since the moment of the big bang, you still wouldn't have found the right key yet.

    They can brute force the PIN, but only with cooperation of the OS.

    --
    John
  86. The best response to attention whores: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just say, in response to whatever bullshit they have to say:

    "Um, sorry, but who the fuck are you again, and why the hell should I give a shit!"

  87. This makes Cringeley look stupid by amh99 · · Score: 1

    Cringeley said in his most recent blog post that he trusted McAfee to be able to do this. Seemed a bit foolish at the time ...

  88. CLINTON FOR 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clinton is a square shooter! Clinton for 2016!

    1. Re:CLINTON FOR 2016! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Piggers are gonna go all the way this year!

  89. Re:Yes or No? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FBI's request relies on there being some as yet undisclosed security flaw which would enable Apple to load the software into memory on the iPhone and execute it from there. Your claim of impossibility relies on there being no security flaw (currently undisclosed, or even currently *unknown*) that would enable such.

  90. Final thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many drugs done all the time sapp your thinking ability.

  91. Trump/McAfee 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the train set they would be playing with wasn't so big and important, it would be worth it just to see the wreck.

  92. Re:Yes or No? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    The FBI's request relies on there being some as yet undisclosed security flaw which would enable Apple to load the software into memory on the iPhone and execute it from there. Your claim of impossibility relies on there being no security flaw (currently undisclosed, or even currently *unknown*) that would enable such.

    The current Jailbreaks for that model and later are *tethered* jailbreaks. This means that the iPone must be *unlocked*.

    Earlier jailbreaks, including the "game over" jailbreak used by redsn0w, were based on the fact that it was a Samsung chip with a known firmware bootloader flaw. When it was checking the cryptographic signature on the boot loader that would load the rest of the OS, you could buffer overflow the cryptographic check itself, and cause the execution of arbitrary code.

    When the CPUs were revised, this *known flaw* in Samsung's verified boot code path in the mask programmed ROM was fixed, which is what necessitated tethered jailbreaks. It was not worth the cost of spinning the chip earlier, given that some phones would have the untethered jailbreak vulnerability, and others would not.

    --

    I have repeatedly stated that it was "within the realm of possibility" and used "if possible"; I have *NEVER* stated "impossible*, only implied it.

    And when challenged to find and disclose such bugs, should they exist, to the FBI, I side with Apple: Fuck. Off.

  93. Re:Yes or No? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Earlier jailbreaks, including the "game over" jailbreak used by redsn0w, were based on the fact that it was a Samsung chip with a known firmware bootloader flaw. When it was checking the cryptographic signature on the boot loader that would load the rest of the OS, you could buffer overflow the cryptographic check itself, and cause the execution of arbitrary code.

    BTW: To do this, you *STILL* had to overwrite the bootloader itself in Flash. And the way that NAND flash works is you reset a block to all 1's (and it has to be the entire block), and then write 0's out where you don't want 1's. So all you have to do is put a TEA sum and the 10 count in the bootloader block, and even with the hardware DFU mode, you've screwed the ability to do an untethered jailbreak, unless they wrote an entire new bootloader. Not that this iPhone model has that flaw in the first place.

  94. iphoneasyunlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.iphoneasyunlock.com