Slashdot Mirror


Intel's Optane SSD Compatible With NVMe; Could Boost MacBook Storage Speeds By 1000x

More details have emerged about Intel's Optane, a new kind of memory and SSD that utilizes 3D Xpoint. The upcoming 3D Xpoint technology, which is supposedly 10 times denser than DRAM and 1,000 times faster than flash storage, will be compatible with NVMe, a storage protocol that allows an SSD to make effective use of a high-speed PCIe. Several MacBook Pro models already support NVMe technology. Apple is often among the first companies to adopt emerging standards and technologies, which has led many to believe that the Cupertino-based company might leverage Intel's Optane solid state drives for super fast performance speeds in its next batch of laptops. Apple is expected to announce the refreshed MacBook lineup sporting Intel Skylake processor later this year.

44 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Only Apple? by pz · · Score: 2

    And the technology won't benefit non-Apple computers?

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Only Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NVMe is making its arrival to PCs as well. Apple is just often among the first to adopt the coolest and most fresh hi-tech.

    2. Re:Only Apple? by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Informative

      NVMe is making its arrival to PCs as well. Apple is just often among the first to adopt the coolest and most fresh hi-tech.

      If by "among the first" you mean later than Dell and pretty much at the same time as Asus, Gigabyte, MSI, and every other first tier motherboard manufacturer.

      Search this list for laptops which had the interface well before Apple introduced it in their line.

      Among the first... more like among the all.

    3. Re:Only Apple? by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really. Not usually. They abandon things ahead of when people think they should but then it usually turns out they were right. Floppies, serial ports, vga, these things dragged on forever, festooned on the sides of PC laptopos and desktops. The early use of postscript is why desktop publishing was so uniform on macs compared to PC, but in doing that they sort of abandoned the drivers for many other printiers. excessive ports on PCs didn't really make them more versatile it meant widespread impatability with other equipment and drivers. So leadership to the next technology also shows up in what you pare down.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:Only Apple? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      That's not true. The Mac Pro does not have an optical drive.

    5. Re:Only Apple? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      at any IT conference, you can easily spot the macbook user by the bag full of adaptors they carry with them.

    6. Re:Only Apple? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      They really only need 2, so why a full bag? 1 MDV->VGA and 1 MDV->HDMI with a HDMI->DVI plugin, which is a pretty common adapter. And the VGA is only necessary because someone refuses to update that 1990s 600x800 projector.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re:Only Apple? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      No Apple products have carried an optical drive for quite a few years now. That was his point. Who uses them anymore, except for a few special cases? And yes, I have a BD writer hooked up, but that's all.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Only Apple? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Oh, upgrading the projector is nothing. It's the cost of replacing the wires in the wall that gets expensive.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Only Apple? by epine · · Score: 1

      Apple has an insatiable appetite for being first off the mark in adopting the next jizz-worthy bling ...

      FTFY.

      Where they really move the industry needle is shaking off yesterday's abrasive crusties. I give them full marks for death of the floppy.

    10. Re:Only Apple? by Phydeaux · · Score: 1

      WHAT!?!? Everybody knows you never go full USB3!

    11. Re:Only Apple? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      And the people who put wires in the wall (or make the intermediary systems those wires connect through) were still putting in VGA a decade after it make sense to do so.

    12. Re:Only Apple? by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Where I work:

      a) VGA is the most common video port on the laptops issued by the company. (2nd most common is mini-DVI.)
      b) VGA is the most likely to get you a image at the native resolution of the variety of displays at a reasonable refresh rate without any jittering.

      So putting in VGA is a sign that interfaces are chosen based on what makes sense, rather than religion.

    13. Re:Only Apple? by Holi · · Score: 2

      Apple just recently added NVME support to OS X (beginning of this year). Windows has had support since 2014 and Linux has had it since 2012. I would say that's a strange definition of "Among the first", more like dead last.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    14. Re:Only Apple? by snapperbazaar · · Score: 1

      apple always come with new thing that's why i am loving apple

    15. Re:Only Apple? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      seriously im not sure if i am supposed to be excited about intels achievement, or that apple (might) usse this technology (sometime down the road)

      i expect this kind of post on a mac fanboi forum

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    16. Re:Only Apple? by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

      Apple is just often among the first to adopt the coolest and most fresh hi-tech.

      Well, that didn't help 1394/Firewire become popular, sadly.

    17. Re:Only Apple? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      And the technology won't benefit non-Apple computers?

      The drives will be faster than an I/O interrupt, but don't fret, your internet speed is the bottle neck. Oh wait, we are going to communicate via laser beam on fibre to the ISP.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    18. Re:Only Apple? by armanox · · Score: 1

      Pshh...I'm upgrading to Twisted Vortex Beams.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    19. Re:Only Apple? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      What makes you think these rooms had installations done in the past decade? We're not all 3 year old start-ups building out brand new lease spaces with $200/SF upfit budgets. Some of these locations I work in are 100 year old buildings with 6 thick reinforced concrete floors and solid masonry walls. When you see what it costs to get new wiring, half the time the owner just says "Fuck it, get me another easel and a giant Postit pad," or "we'll paint on the wall with tree sap and crushed beetles instead."

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  2. Ha ha ha, no. by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure someone messed up the numbers, because they don't make any sense.

    The current MacBook Pro has an SSD that is only 10x slower than its RAM in terms of data rate (not in terms of latency of course). This new SSD would be 100x faster than the RAM, which would be pointless.

    1. Re:Ha ha ha, no. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Codename: OBLIO

  3. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Since when is disk/SSD speed the bottleneck for non-server systems?

    1. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite.

      A lot of us use Laptops (luggables) as portable servers. With 32Gb of RAM and an i7 we can run many VM's.
      I'm working on one at the moment. 1 Oracle VM, 1 SQLServer VM, 2 Application VM's. Total Disk Space > 200Gb. My current laptop is an HP Elitebook. 17in Screen and 3.5Gb of SSD.
      The faster the storage the better IMHO.
      If apple would support 32Gb of Ram I'd move to a MacBook.
       

    2. Re:Sorry by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      With this new SSD performance, do you really need more RAM? Virtual RAM (ie, that "slow" disk based overflow) might support your needs. If you need 16GB+ in a single set of processes concurrently, then yes, 32 or 64GB is appealing. I'm running on 24GB and had considered 48GB, but after analyzing my usage parameters, I almost never hit swap with a couple of changes in habits and an upgrade to 10.10. (Safari and Firefox were notorious memory hogs, Safari is much much better in 10.10 - no I don't run Chrome spyware for my main browsing)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Sorry by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Shoot I am running 8 vms now. My cpu has not ever gone beyond 20% like ever lol. However, I got the i7 k series which do not support VT-d which means it uses software for disk access without IOMMU by can virtualize everything else with hyper-v. My host Win 8.1 reports a 390MS for disk access. My server 2k12R2 guests report 3250 MS latency.

      So a slower i5 with vt-x and vtd on a type 1 hypervisor can perform the best. I could trade my i7k to an i7S but I surprisingly do not need a faster cpu to my astonishment for that insane load.

      Virtualbox or vmware workstation might need a beefy i7 as they are type1 and use software

    4. Re:Sorry by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I regularly load my CPU to 1100%+ (yes, 12 virtual cores) for long periods of time. I guess it depends upon your work load types (Video processing) It's amazing how much time it takes to render some HD+ Camera video into a useable 10 minute video segment, for instance.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:Sorry by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      'portable server'? I think you mean WORKSTATION. You dont 'lug' a server, you migrate it from one fixed location to another. You are running non-operational simulations on a workstation, you are not serving.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Sorry by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Since the time that processes claim at least the amount of ram as 'swap image' on the swap space.
      And: since the time that every tab in a web browser is its own process.

      So my 8GB ram laptop conquers 8GB of disk space for every process, browser tab or ordinary process.

      Luckily they don't use so much space and optimize usage. Nevertheless about 200GB of my 512GB flash SSD is occupied by 'processes' on the swap file.

      Nevertheless switching tabs is no longer instant but takes up to 3 seconds. Faster disks make that faster.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Sorry by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you run in your VMs... I had a single VM running and loading near 12 full cores as well. Again, use cases determine everything.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  4. Learn to swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple is often among the first companies to adopt emerging standards and technologies ... Apple is expected to announce the refreshed MacBook lineup sporting Intel Skylake processor later this year.

    Oh wow. And yet I can order a Lenovo T560 right now that has a Skylake processor (i7-6600U) and a PCIe-NVMe SSD (that can be easily swapped out for an Optane or any other NVMe SSD you want). Let me just wait until later this year for Apple to lead the way, though.

    1. Re:Learn to swim by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      What counts as "among the first companies" though? Does 5th place still count?

    2. Re:Learn to swim by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What counts as "among the first companies" though? Does 5th place still count?

      They were among the first to adopt USB, and thunderbolt. They did lag a bit on USB2, but eh. So did most PCs. That they are using old CPUs right now doesn't really change that they are often among the first to adopt new technologies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Learn to swim by Gondola · · Score: 1

      "Among the first" is weak language. It could feasibly refer to major hardware manufacturers or even operating systems (considering how few there are, that's a really weak statement, but still technically true.)

  5. Re:Will world leaders use this too? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    Intel's new Optane SSDs are so fast, you achieve orgasm even before your porn videos files are opened.

  6. Re:Will world leaders use this too? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 2

    all i care about is: will it be fast enough for in-place execution? can we finally eliminate the need for ram AND storage? i like the idea of HP's "machine"

  7. Re:Will world leaders use this too? by Intron · · Score: 1

    all i care about is: will it be fast enough for in-place execution? can we finally eliminate the need for ram AND storage? i like the idea of HP's "machine"

    Since DRAM isn't fast enough for in-place execution, why do you care? All computers have multiple storage tiers: registers, cache, RAM, etc.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  8. Eventually... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fanboy with stars in his eyes is completely ignoring the fact that Intel has shown first 3D XPoint products that are just twice as fast as flash-based SSDs. The 1000x density and speed factors he's slobbering over are projected ceilings, which will take years to achieve in actual hardware.

    1. Re:Eventually... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The 1000x density and speed factors he's slobbering over are projected ceilings, which will take years to achieve in actual hardware.

      Ah, just like the 10 GHz P4 that was just on the horizon, as the Networst architecture was designed for clock speeds rather than real-life performance and efficiency.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  9. mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The fastest processors and GPU available three years ago. As long as you buy the most expensive product.

  10. Also: So fucking what. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    If you got a PC and want this SSD you'll have it, if you don't you won't. Free choice.

    Guess an alternative head-line would be:
    "Future Macbook buyers will be forced to buy ridiculously expensive SSD-drive"
    alternative
    "Finally! Now you can get an Intel Octane drive with your Macbook too!"
    Or
    "Why the fuck aren't the latest and greatest Macbooks equipped with .."

    Of course it's likely user-exchangeable in this case even in a Mac but you get the point...

  11. Sensible chuckle by MacDork · · Score: 1

    Apple is often among the first companies to adopt emerging standards and technologies, ... Apple is expected to announce the refreshed MacBook lineup sporting Intel Skylake processor later this year.

    Yes, Skylake. The technology that's been shipping since fall of last year.

  12. not 1000X anytime soon by duckintheface · · Score: 2

    This headline is very misleading. Yes, 3D XPoint itself is 1000 times as fast as flash. But it's limited by the interface speed. Using the PCIe-NVme interface, the Optane SSD will be about 7 times as fast as a flash SSD. To take advantage of the full 3D XPoint speed, there will have to be a new, custom interface, and probably some software and operating system changes. All this is great but the headline is jumping ahead of the linked stories.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
  13. Re:Cost by unixisc · · Score: 1

    There ain't much of a price gap per GB b/w NAND & DRAM. And in any case, an SSD that's as fast as DRAM would be more valuable and thereby cost more, and probably eliminate the need to have RAM in the first place.