Slashdot Mirror


Odroid C2 Challenges Raspberry Pi 3 On Hardware But Not Ecosystem (hackaday.com)

szczys writes: We are surely in the age of single-board computers as the words "Raspberry Pi" sneak into the ranks of [a] household name. Many would have thought this impossible, but for hardware enthusiasts it has wide-reaching benefits as others clamor to enter the market. The most formidable challenge made so far is by the Hardkernel Odroid C2 which bests the Pi 3 on hardware, but not everything. Odroid C2 has the same cores, running faster with more RAM. It swaps out gigabit Ethernet for the Pi 3's somewhat unimpressive Wi-Fi chip. And it includes onboard eMMC (useful for faster booting) as well as an SD card slot. Odroid C2's hardware is clearly a better offering than Pi 3 for just $5 more (as we saw from the benchmarks last week), but that's not the entire story. It's further down Linux stream for a less mature distro, and has nowhere near the community support that has opened the Pi [up] to just about everyone. But it is the hardware geek's SBC with the layman's price tag and that's a very interesting indicator of where we are with low-cost computing.

42 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. Not a fan of Odroid by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even disregarding the community aspect, Odroid runs a weirdo/old software stack. If it was running something more akin to Raspbian which is pretty close to mainline Debian, i would be more interested in it. I dont even like using Adafruit's custom raspbian images they provide with their ~3" TFT screens.

    --
    Good-bye
    1. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not sure why you got marked as flamebait here.

      For Insignal and Hardkernel's Exynos-based Android projects, their poor software support (vastly outdated software baselines - no excuse for development reference boards to have older software than carrier-approved Android handset releases for the same SoC, software baselines which were vasty different from any shipped product containing SoC, and Hardkernel's distribution of their Android source as a 2GB megatarball with no commit history - I hear they might have finally fixed this but back in 2012 their source was a 2.2GB megatarball) was the reason that nearly all maintainers of AOSP-derivative projects (such as CyanogenMod) for Samsung Exynos-based hardware decided to stop working with Samsung devices in late 2012. They were, simply, a bugridden nightmare.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Even disregarding the community aspect, Odroid runs a weirdo/old software stack.

      Ubuntu 16.04 is "weirdo/old"?

      The reason I'd avoid it is because I' m trying to use one of their XU4s to run a GigE camera, and under Ubuntu 15.4 it appears to have issues handling jumbo frames. That's a bit better than what happens using the official Hardkernel Ubuntu 15.10 -- the GigE controller (connected through the USB, as is done on the Pi) disconnects about ten seconds after being initialized. I.e., it simply disappears. And I can't get an answer from Hardkernel about any fixes they plan for this.

      I'm guessing it is poor quality control from a Chinese factory using ROHS solder. It certainly wouldn't be anything unrelated to the specific board, like the 15.10 drivers just plain don't work with the hardware, could it?

      As for the summary, no, the C2 does not swap out GigE, it swaps IN GigE.

    3. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by nickittynickname · · Score: 1

      The draw of Odroid is running android. It works pretty well on their hardware. It's still a "weirdo" stack but it's hands down bang for buck for running android. If you want Linux then yeah, raspberry pi is probably what you want.

    4. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by Trongy · · Score: 1

      Even disregarding the community aspect, Odroid runs a weirdo/old software stack.

      Ubuntu 16.04 is "weirdo/old"?

      You are talking about the top of the software stack. He was talking about the bottom of the software stack - the firmware/binary blobs and the non-mainstream kernel drivers that you need to run on the odroid.

      The reason I'd avoid it is because I' m trying to use one of their XU4s to run a GigE camera, and under Ubuntu 15.4 it appears to have issues handling jumbo frames ...

      Like he said - "weird/old software stack". It sounds like Hardkernel are doing hacks in the kernel source to get things partly working, but contributing them back to the mainline kernel (which is where QA happens in the linux world).

    5. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      but typically replace (at least) kernel and bootloader with custom versions

      Um, how else do you expect them to do it? Ubuntu cannot support every possible board out there. ARM-hardware is a wild, wild west and not nearly as standardized as x86, with nearly each and every board requiring u-boot specifically built for that specific board -- there is no generic build that you can distribute that'd work on even a fraction of all of them.

      also often not being available in (buildable-) source.

      A quick look at their wiki lists instructions on how to build both u-boot and the kernel from sources.. http://odroid.com/dokuwiki/dok... http://odroid.com/dokuwiki/dok...

    6. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by homm2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not to you, but I enjoy having the choice.

    7. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by llamahunter · · Score: 1

      I had an odroid C1. Though it has nice specs, the software is incredibly flaky. I would routinely get software updates from hard kernel that would corrupt the boot loader, disable networking, etc. There was a period where they shipped a wifi driver for their *own* branded wifi adapter that could not reliably connect to name brand access points if there were more than a few visible to the device. When I complained that hard kernel was routinely hosing my productivity for pushing untested software into its release channel, I was told by hard kernel employees on its discussion boards that I shouldn't expect stability from a 'development board'. I ended up getting a rPI 2 and have been *much* happier with its general stability, as well as it's better community support. I recommend you stay *far* away from odroid products.

    8. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      but typically replace (at least) kernel and bootloader with custom versions

      Um, how else do you expect them to do it? Ubuntu cannot support every possible board out there. ARM-hardware is a wild, wild west and not nearly as standardized as x86, with nearly each and every board requiring u-boot specifically built for that specific board -- there is no generic build that you can distribute that'd work on even a fraction of all of them.

      The problem is not the customization. it's the lack of support. Basically they dump you a kernel and that's it - the changes are there, but good luck porting it to something more recent or newer.

      The specs are good, but basically, the support is lousy. The rPi may have poorer hardware, but the community is big enough that getting support for later kernels and such is pretty easy.

      Sure if it's a one off product, Odroid is fine as a ship it and forget it product. But if you want to play around with it after a year the software stack is too old to be usable, and there'll be help in getting more recent software.

    9. Re:Not a fan of Odroid by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I do not disagree about the support, I disagree with the anon's post. As I said in the other Odroid C2-advertisement that was just recently posted here, RPi seems like it has the most longevity of the various ARM SBCs for now -- it even has a FOSS GPU-driver now (a work-in-progress, but nevertheless), capable of full OpenGL instead of just GLES, and that's not something any of the other boards can claim.

      If one was looking for SBCs I'd recommend the RPi over the others, even if it has worse specs, simply because of the promise of better longevity and larger community. If/when they release the RPi4 I do wonder if they'll go with Videocore V -- the community is already familiar with Videocore IV, so that familiarity and knowledge might aid in porting everything over to Videocore V faster than to something entirely alien.

  2. Swaps out Wifi or ethernet (which PI 3 ALSO has) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How is swapping out wifi with no add-on board (PI 3) for a wired interface an improvement?? For $5 extra?

    Pi 3 is targeting stuff that is useful. Built in wifi, relatively modern linux base etc.

    And if its not good enough wait 6 months for the next version.

     

  3. Re:Slashvertisement again ? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    It looked like "News for nerds, stuff that matters." to me, anyway. How's your Broadcom stock doing today?

  4. c2 vs pi3 by millette · · Score: 2

    Actual link to the Odroid C2 vs Raspberri Pi 3 comparison:
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.p...

  5. If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    RPi is a video capture/processing chip (Broadcom VideoCore) with an ARM co-processor. Compresses, manipulates, and streams Full HD input video in real-time.

    ODroid has no video input at all (the product page suggests getting a USB camera which performs its own compression, because the ODroid could never keep up)

    Ok, probably most users care more about the general-purpose ARM cores and Linux than the VideoCore, but it's just wrong to say that ODroid "has the same cores but faster", when the biggest portion of BCM2837, the VideoCore, is completely absent from the ODroid.

  6. The second plug in a week by DrXym · · Score: 1

    What the fuck is this about?

    1. Re:The second plug in a week by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      A company that's little known but produces massively better hardware than hyped RasPi does deserve some spotlight. As for support for bad hardware, you can return it for a limited time after purchase -- but really, both for RasPi and hardkernel the hardware's cost is low enough compared to shipping costs that it's less hassle to just throw away and buy new. We're not talking about $5000 or more servers here.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  7. Re:faster booting by dmbasso · · Score: 1

    It's not a multiuser system, and it's highly unlikely someone could damage it remotely. Even if it happened, there's nothing of much importance in it (it's mostly a secondary dns, mx, and xmpp server). Userland libs and services are kept up-to-date and restarted as needed, though.

    --
    `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  8. Re:If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Ok, probably most users care more about the general-purpose ARM cores and Linux than the VideoCore, but it's just wrong to say that ODroid "has the same cores but faster", when the biggest portion of BCM2837, the VideoCore, is completely absent from the ODroid.

    Interesting to know, as I am one of said users, and as a this actually makes me more likely to consider an ODroid C2.

  9. Re:It's the same as PC vs Mac by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    I'm a troll for bashing the company who made the computer I choose to use every day?

  10. Higher Specs look good on Paper by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Higher Specs look good on paper, but are not nearly as important as stability and well written software. I have the original version that looked amazing next to the pi 2. But it crashes all the time and the only video player that works on it is Kodi.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  11. Re:Competition is good for Pi by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    So when are any of these SBC makers going to set up an educational foundation, and start supporting their stuff for use by educators and students in the 8-17 age bracket?

    They're just tapping into the market of 18-60 year olds who buy shitty SBCs for embedded home projects? Raspberry Pi doesn't have anything to worry about. In fact, they can better focus on their project goals if crap-board vendors tap off and remove that secondary customer group from their product.

    Most of these cheap SBC makers actually corrupt the goals of the Raspberry Pi creators. They take away the open Digital I/O pins, which is half of the equation with the RPi. That's fine for all of the abstractionists who wouldn't know what to do with bare hardware in the first place, and are probably even frightened because bare hardware is scary and unsafe.

  12. community by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the barriers to entering the "community" are pretty low. As a baby step the ODroid could have put the connectors and mounting holes in the same place as an Rpi, that would at least have made it possible to use some of the mechanical accessories, like enclosures and maybe even some of the more exotic accessories like GPIO breakout cables.

    I don't see any other small form factors getting much traction, it's not as if there are lots of vendors making mobile-itx form factor boards and enclosures. Which is a shame, because they might have been better thought out if there had been more input at the design stage from a variety of vendors

    --
    Nullius in verba
  13. Re:It's the same as PC vs Mac by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    It's not off-topic at all, the main debate about C2 vs Pi3 is about price vs hardware. And it's not trolling if it's true. The entry-level Mac mini, given the hardware specifications, should cost at least 40% less.

  14. Re:Swaps out Wifi or ethernet (which PI 3 ALSO has by fnj · · Score: 1

    How is swapping out wifi with no add-on board (PI 3) for a wired interface an improvement?? For $5 extra?

    The Odroid is GIGABIT ethernet, sparky. The Pi isn't even really a fully capable 100 Mb. It is hanging off the same terrible chip that implements the USBs. At least that's the promise of the Odroid. The Odroid hardware QC is so shaky, however, I've avoided trying it so far.

  15. Re:Competition is good for Pi by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I've seen people online asking questions and trying to get windows to run on some of these other Raspberry Pi wannabes. It's hysterical.

  16. Re:RPi CVEs by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I've yet to do it. I use sudo for a lot of stuff but never tried being root.

  17. Re:Swaps out Wifi or ethernet (which PI 3 ALSO has by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Considering the power of the hardware I don't see much of a bottle neck with the Pi. Gig ethernet would probably not be that noticeable on that platform. Speed isn't really it's thing. It's just fast enough. Just.

  18. Re:If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I think they both have their own audience. At this price point you'll never make everyone happy with one board.

  19. Re:If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    RPi is a video capture/processing chip (Broadcom VideoCore) with an ARM co-processor. Compresses, manipulates, and streams Full HD input video in real-time.

    ODroid has no video input at all (the product page suggests getting a USB camera which performs its own compression, because the ODroid could never keep up)

    Ok, probably most users care more about the general-purpose ARM cores and Linux than the VideoCore, but it's just wrong to say that ODroid "has the same cores but faster", when the biggest portion of BCM2837, the VideoCore, is completely absent from the ODroid.

    Incorrect. The Odroid-C2 uses the Amlogic S905 SoC which does have a built-in encoding/decoding block. It supports much higher resolutions and framerates than RPi, including formats the RPi's Videocore IV doesn't support at all; Videocore IV doesn't support e.g. HEVC, let alone 10-bit HEVC, whereas the S905 does do both.

  20. Re:Swaps out Wifi or ethernet (which PI 3 ALSO has by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    I have the slightly older Odroid C1, which competes against the PI2. Gigabit is definitely noticeable, and it quite happily saturates the Gigabit link well before saturating the CPU. It performs well enough that I can use the Odroid as low cost, low power file server.

  21. Re:If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at by vovin · · Score: 1

    RPi is a video capture/processing chip (Broadcom VideoCore) with an ARM co-processor. Compresses, manipulates, and streams Full HD input video in real-time.

    As opposed to 4K video at 60 fps on the ODroid? Depending on how to slice that up you should be able to transcode 2 or 4 Full HD streams at 30 fps at the same time.

    ODroid has no video input at all (the product page suggests getting a USB camera which performs its own compression, because the ODroid could never keep up)

    This has to do with bandwidth on USB. Doing 4k screen grabs over USB at 30 or 60 FPS ain't gonna happen. Unless you have a dedicated path to offload the data to the VPU you can't even feed it fast enough to do anything remotely useful.

    Ok, probably most users care more about the general-purpose ARM cores and Linux than the VideoCore, but it's just wrong to say that ODroid "has the same cores but faster", when the biggest portion of BCM2837, the VideoCore, is completely absent from the ODroid.

    Hardware wise the ODroid is a bargain.
    Fitness for use is up to each application.
    Software support ... to be honest hardkernel doesn't have a good track record with Exynos but perhaps they will get better support through Amlogic.

    And to be fair Broadcom is still one of the worst chip vendors when it comes to specs and support. What makes the RPi anything but DoA is the community that formed around the ultra cheap platform. So while RPi is riding the wave there is lots of room for a new player in the mid-range but low cost hobbyist market.

  22. Re:If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    As opposed to 4K video at 60 fps on the ODroid? Depending on how to slice that up you should be able to transcode 2 or 4 Full HD streams at 30 fps at the same time.

    You're mixing up encoding and decoding. The S905 can't encode at 4K @ 60FPS, it only does 1080p @ 60 FPS encoding.

  23. Re:Competition is good for Pi by dbIII · · Score: 1

    WinCE could do it but unless you are planning to only run a single application it's a pain. I've got a handy little WinCE box that runs as an X terminal (how weird is that) and it works well. I've got an ebook reader running WinCE that does not work well since it's a situation where multi-tasking would be nice (yes I know WinCE has been shown to multi-task in rigged toy demos but it doesn't get used in the wild) and it's sloooow handing over from the launcher application to the ereader functions.
    There are newer things descended from WinCE but they need a bit more resources.

  24. Re:If you ignore the thing RPi hardware is best at by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Win some lose some. That chip is a bit of a bottleneck for other things (USB, ethernet) and is the reason the Pi has a 1GB memory ceiling - so if you care about the video it's wonderful and if you don't care it's worth using something else if you want to use it for something that hits limits.

  25. Re:Swaps out Wifi or ethernet (which PI 3 ALSO has by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    The Odroid hardware QC is so shaky, however, I've avoided trying it so far.

    Last I checked they were offering a whopping 30 days warranty on these SBCs. That's not a sign of confidence in the product.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Isn't this the 2nd news about Odroid C2 RPi3? by Eloking · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, yes it is : https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

    --
    Elok
  27. Calling odrioid software immature is an understate by JimLynch2445 · · Score: 1

    I did a simple apt-get dist-upgrade and bricked the stupid thing.

  28. Re:Calling odrioid software immature is an underst by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

    I did an apt-get dist-upgrade and did not brick the stupid thing.

    Also, "brick" means that you can't recover it unless you use complicated procedures like unsoldering/soldering chips, flashing through JTAG etc. How is pulling out the SD card and reimaging it akin to "bricking"?

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  29. Be warned - hardware support is limited, video bad by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    As I posted previously:

    I own a Odroid C1+ I intended to use as a mini network television appliance - basically a home-brew Tablo. I had convinced myself that since it ran a recent-looking version of Ubuntu, and that version supported my USB tuner stick, I was good to go.

    In fact, the OS for the C1+ is a weird hybrid of a very old kernel (3.10 IIRC) and somewhat newer, but still oldish, user-space code. For those new to this, the current kernel is 4.4.4, and 3.10 was released in June 2013. This kernel dates from before the gigantic LinuxTV merge in 3.16, which means that practically no video of any sort works out of the box. You can install things like VLC and/or Kodi and get video that way, but almost all devices - cameras, tuners, etc. - will not work out of the box. In contrast, almost all of these will work out of the box on the RPi.

    A much larger issue is the lack of hardware compression/decompression. The Mali 450 is a powerful GPU, much faster than the one in the RPi, but lacks any API for this sort of codec support. The AmLogic CPU does include a "VPU" system, basically a SIMD unit, but the API is proprietary. I am aware of only one program that uses it, Kodi, where it is supported by code in the Kodi stack itself. This code is not available to other programs, like ffmpeg or gstreamer. In contrast, the RPi has widespread codec support, although you have to buy the 264 license key.

    So, if you are doing anything video-like other than bare Kodi, the C1+ is *not a good product*. Your hardware probably won't work, and if you get lucky and it does, the performance will be very poor. On my C1+, x264 compresses at ~10 FPS, while an RPi, ostensibly much slower, manages about 25.

  30. Re: Slashvertisement again ? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > I got one of the Cubieboard SBCs.

    Winner of the "Most Hilarious Chinglish Website" award. Utterly indecipherable. Try to find product details, it leads to a 3rd party review at Nerdbench.

  31. Re:RPi CVEs by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    sudo lets you run a command as root (uid=0). So yes, you've used root plenty of times.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  32. Re:Swaps out Wifi or ethernet (which PI 3 ALSO has by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Considering the power of the hardware I don't see much of a bottle neck with the Pi.

    I can get over 20 MB/sec to a USB3 GoFlex on a Pogoplug Series 4... near its locally-connected speed. That's got just one core at an even lower clock rate.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"