Slashdot Mirror


Reports: NVIDIA Launching a Distro of Its Own (phoronix.com)

An anonymous reader writes: There are unconfirmed reports that NVIDIA is working on its own Linux distribution dubbed "NLINUX." This NLINUX is supposedly a Linux platform optimized for gamers and similar to SteamOS, but NVIDIA has yet to confirm these reports and the sole evidence appears to be a circulating screenshot of an NLINUX install screen. Would you be interested in a Linux distribution created by an IHV? Somewhat similar is Intel's own Linux distribution, Clear Linux, that offers high performance Linux on Intel x86_64 hardware.

149 comments

  1. It's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's an edited web page.

    1. Re:It's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:It's a hoax by gQuigs · · Score: 2
    3. Re:It's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .....the fact no one has caught up on this makes me really sad

    4. Re:It's a hoax by Holi · · Score: 2
      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:It's a hoax by Holi · · Score: 1

      I mean if it's so real, why not post a link to the actual page instead of an image?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  2. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by jtayon · · Score: 0

    Would I be interested in nvidia's version of Linux?

    Totally : when winter is cold nothing beats a 350W alim serving a bloated linux with an openGL screensaver to warm my flat.

  3. Would I be interested in nvidia's version of Linux by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2

    No, id quite like a steambox though

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  4. Mobile is broken now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after we had the HTTPS garbage shoved down our throats.

    1. Re:Mobile is broken now... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      after we had the HTTPS garbage shoved down our throats.

      Perhaps it needs fixes, but HTTPS is a good news, since the trend is about malware injection in HTTP streams

    2. Re:Mobile is broken now... by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I'm a verizon wireless user one of the millions that were subject to a tracking code injected into all of our outgoing http traffic.

      They let you opt out of that part of traffic fkery now but thats just one thing https prevents.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re: Mobile is broken now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/prevents/makes harder/gi

      Security is about the cost of attacking the target. Mostly by making it so expensive that the attacker does not even try. "Ping my server and I will break one of your legs" being on the extreem Russian blackhat end if the scale.

    4. Re: Mobile is broken now... by jofas · · Score: 1

      Lol what are you on about? Makes no sense.

    5. Re: Mobile is broken now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He makes perfect sense. Whereas you appear to have none.

  5. remember this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw

  6. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thanks for keeping us posted on what you're not interested in.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not? Are you trolling?

  8. Depends on the Licensing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they'll contribute upstream and make whatever they're doing available to people like SteamOS, Debian, and RedHat, I'm absolutely in favor of this!

    Hardware vendors should contribute code liberally to the linux kernel source. If all they're doing is a custom debian variant that they can control package versions on to make their drivers look better than they are, then I'll pass.

    1. Re:Depends on the Licensing by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why anyone would mark your post insightful. This statement: " they can control package versions on to make their drivers look better" makes it clear that you have no idea how drivers and the kernel relate to user space.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Depends on the Licensing by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Get an education moron. It isn't my responsibility to teach you about Linux.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  9. Specific and Custom Linux by Master+Moose · · Score: 2

    If something is coded to be optimised for specific hardware - good on them.

    So long as all code, components, drivers etc remain fully open - and are available to the wider linux community I say go for it.

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
    1. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      You do understand, don't you, that nVidia has never provided OSS drivers for Linux? Their Linux drivers are nothing more than binary blobs that you can only install by booting into a CLI, then rebooting after the installation is complete. And, you have to do the exact same thing each and every time your kernel is updated. Yes, Fedora uses a simpler system, akmod-nvidia, but that's just a repackaging of the binary blob for those of us who don't want to reboot twice every time there's a new kernel.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      If your system uses DKMS, then all of that is handled transparently during the upgrade process, and doesn't introduce any extra reboots.

      That said, I stopped buying NVidia products once the open source AMD driver became usable for desktop workloads. Now I buy only AMD video cards.

    3. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) The driver can be upgraded with X11 running.
      2) You can reload the driver without rebooting.

    4. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by kuzb · · Score: 0

      This is a clear case of cutting your nose off to spite your face. Not only do you now have underperforming video hardware, you have underperforming drivers to go with it.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    5. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Where as I am the opposite. I simply don't care if the source is closed or not. I care if it works. And currently I would never buy an AMD card to run on Linux until their drivers improve dramatically. Linux is why I don't use AMD.

    6. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by DrJimbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You do understand, don't you, that nVidia has never provided OSS drivers for Linux? Their Linux drivers are nothing more than binary blobs that you can only install by booting into a CLI, then rebooting after the installation is complete.

      About 10 or 12 years ago I had a Dell laptop that had Nvidia graphics. I was running Gentoo Linux. I reported some bug with the Nvidia driver. Within hours late Saturday, early Sunday I got a reply from Nvidia with a patch to the MM kernel that fixed the problem. The bug was not in the Nvidia driver but was caused by recent change in the MM kernel. I was very impressed. In this case they were acting like an FOSS shop not a proprietary software shop.

      I grant you the closed portions of the Nvidia drivers can be a royal pain in the neck, especially when combined with the closed Flash player. There were times when it was maddening but that was partly driven by an obsession by some Gentoo devs to be overly zealous with purging versions of the Nvidia driver from the portage system. Things have been mostly stable for a good number of years now.

      I appreciate the Linux support Nvidia does provide. For example, I've been using VDPAU which does video decoding on the graphics card which let me play blu-rays on a machine with a not so powerful CPU. Also, I've never had to reboot in order to update the Nvidia driver. I do have to rmmod the old driver after I stop X but that's no biggie. YMMVG

      I am interested in seeing the Nvidia distro if they release one but I'm not holding my breath.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
    7. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by bloodhawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is amusing I had a similar issue about 10 years ago with the Linux driver and one of their new cards. I reported the details of the bug, how to recreate it etc. What I got back was basically an insult of bad luck we don't really offer any support, "either take what is to offer or go with one of the competitors (HaHa)", The HaHa part was actually part of the response as at the time no one came close to matching Nvidia performance so there was no real option.

      A few months later AMD came out with some competitive offerings I immediately went about removing Nvidia from all future orders we made for our enterprise for both windows and Linux and of course any personal purchases even when it meant I got less performance. The total disregard for a loyal customer at the time was more than I could stomach or forgive and I have not purchased a single Nvidia based system where I had any say in the specs since. I like to think I have cost them a pretty penny, or at least the prick that responded to me at the time has cost them a pretty penny, realistically it probably no more than 100k desktops but still I like to think that that is 100k desktops of revenue AMD has that they don't.

    8. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand, don't you, that nVidia has never provided OSS drivers for Linux? Their Linux drivers are nothing more than binary blobs that you can only install by booting into a CLI, then rebooting after the installation is complete. And, you have to do the exact same thing each and every time your kernel is updated. Yes, Fedora uses a simpler system, akmod-nvidia, but that's just a repackaging of the binary blob for those of us who don't want to reboot twice every time there's a new kernel.

      Huh, thats funny. I have never had to reboot my Linux system to install the Nvidia drivers. The steps were:
      - Check for prerequisites (compiler, kernel with module support and the correct features, glibc headers, kernel headers and a few other bits and pieces)
      - run the installer in a terminal window
      - get annoyed at installer not working
      - extract the contents of the installer
      - run the install scripts
      - curse loudly
      - compile the kernel module manually
      - run install scripts again
      - curse loudly as the install script runs make clean
      - edit install script
      - manually compile kernel module again
      - run install scripts
      - check the installation (check to see if the module will insert without errors)
      - (optional) modify source to get it to compile because my kernel version was not the same that the Nvidia guys were using
      - repeat installation
      - restart X
      - curse again as X wasn't configured properly
      - configure X to use the nvidia stuff
      - restart X again
      - watch GLXGears run at a capped 200 frames per second

      ------OR-------

      - Install Nvidia driver package (rpm, deb, tar.gz)
      - restart X
      - watch GLXGears run at a capped 200 frames per second

    9. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense.

      Without the [distro's] simpler system, you'd be "booting into CLI and rebooting after the installation is complete" for each and every open or closed source kernel module you had to gcc yourself and then modprobe manually, every time the kernel is upgraded.

      Your argument is invalid. I'm sure there's a name for this fallacy but I can't be assed to look it up.

    10. Re: Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when morons run companies. You basically switched to an inferior product just because of one bad email conversation. Awesome.

    11. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the right choice but for the wrong reason.

      As a professional you should have picked AMD (Presumably ATI back then?) because they provided support and Nvidia didn't.
      To pick a worse vendor just because you don't like the language or tone the better one uses would be unprofessional.

      The end result is still the same, but only because of coincidence, another time it might screw you over.
      There are a few really competent people out there that will help you solve any problem, even the ones you have caused yourself and deliver a solution together with a snide remark. Nut using them is good for your ego but bad for your business.

    12. Re: Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is what happens when you let retards act as the face of your company, AMD are more cost effective anyway and For most purposes AMD is as good or even better than Nvidia. Nvidia back in the early to mid 2000's acted like total pricks to many customers as they had such a significant performance advantage that many in the company thought they were the "shit" and could treat peple like crpa.

    13. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      AMD/ATI were actually a far better solution at the time that I started to do this. But I used to have a lot of loyalty and faith in the Nvidia product line, had they treated our support request with even basic courtesy then they would have had a chance at maintaining the relationship even if they were slightly more expensive (better the devil you know).

      As to the other numbnut A/C coward that responded saying I went to an inferior product, grow the fuck up and do your research, back in mid 2000 there was very little difference between them and it came down mostly to price and support unless you had very specific software that favoured one or the other. Nvidia proved they didn't do support.

    14. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

      You do understand, don't you, that nVidia has never provided OSS drivers for Linux? Their Linux drivers are nothing more than binary blobs that you can only install by booting into a CLI, then rebooting after the installation is complete. And, you have to do the exact same thing each and every time your kernel is updated. Yes, Fedora uses a simpler system, akmod-nvidia, but that's just a repackaging of the binary blob for those of us who don't want to reboot twice every time there's a new kernel.

      All I ever have needed to do is log into a console, kill the xserver, run the installer and restart the xserver. If you need to reboot to install modules for a running kernel you may be doing it wrong. I've been running debian with nvidia drivers for hardware acceleration because I like my compiz eye-candy .

      I have done the same with a laptop gentoo install.

      --
      Serenity now, insanity later.
    15. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I stopped buying NVidia products once the open source AMD driver became usable for desktop workloads.

      You must be from the future. Tell us more about the coming decades.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    16. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've been responsible for 100,000 desktop system purchases? Note: That is not doubt, I've seen you post before and have absolutely no reason to doubt you, but it is me trying to make sure I understand completely.

      I thought that I might hold some sort of record in that area. I do not. If I had to guess, I'd say that I'm in the 2 to 3k region. However, it was either my company or a purchase that was gifted. For example, I keep a local elementary school's system stocked - I adopted them when I retired to the area. I refresh every couple of years and let them keep the old ones. (They've only got 56 students, a small staff, and a single IT staff.)

      100,000? I am duly impressed. I've bought servers, routers, load balancing equipment, HVAC gear, switches and hubs and even hardware firewalls. I've filled racks, I've filled entire server rooms, and even purchased giant disk arrays. Hell, I've even helped run fiber but mostly did the chasing. I've done a couple of splices but that's really not something I'm going to say I know how to do - I was aided in doing so.

      Oddly, I don't really use any Apple products but I guess I can probably still say that I have *personally* purchased more iDevices than anyone here, with the caveat that it was with my own money. (The school's rather fond of Apple gear and I understand why and agree with their choices. If you're unfamiliar with it, Apple actually gives a pretty good discount for school purchases.)

      But, back to the point... So that I'm sure I understand correctly, you mean 100,000 desktops have been purchased at your discretion? Remind me to *not* invest in a company that has pissed you off. Ripple effects on that kind of purchase power are immense. People like you need to fill out some good, thorough, surveys so that someone can crunch that data. InfoWorld and eWeek used to have some survey results and they used to make sure I got their whitepapers. I haven't seen anything like that in years. Years and years.

      Which leads to my real question... So... (This is me buttering you up.) Umm... You being all-powerful, master and commander, and knowing of all things - both good and evil... I don't suppose you know what happened to those whitepapers that said what the industry leaders where buying and why? Specifically for end-user gear would be my desire. It's time to prepare to refresh the school soon. I'll do it over this coming summer and I've not been paying enough attention. I've been leaning towards whatever iDevice gets recommended to me by the IT guy but I'm open to suggestions and able to greatly influence what he's interested in. He's not chained to Apple but Apple's the district's standard - sort of. They hook kids up with laptops in middle school. This is the elementary school. We do what we want. (And the district doesn't mind, they love that I help the kids out.)

      So, got any good links where I can find the latest opinions on enterprise grade from actual people in the trenches and a history of making purchases? I have, indeed, searched Google a bunch of times. I've not really found anything good and trustworthy. Half the papers are vendor "sponsored" crap and the other half are flawed by asking stupid questions to stupid people. At least those are what I've found.

      Hmm... How else can I appeal to your good, kind, soul? Oh! Ha! It's for the children. It really is, think of the children. Better, think of the poor single IT staffer (just one - and he's not always able to be on-site) and the work he'll have to go through. I've considered an AskSlashdot but, I gotta be honest here, I've *seen* the results to those. If it matters, I still have a CDW account and they were still pretty unbiased/good the last time I went through them. If it's not Apple, I'll almost certainly go through them again but I've actually considered NewEgg.

      Sorry for the novella but I figured I'd ask - seeing as you do appear to be a preeminent expert on the subject. (Not sarcasm. You don't get to those kind of numbers without knowing your shit.) Hell, that last part isn't even meant to butter you up. ;-) If you've got any direction - I'd love to know. I'd go so far as to tell the kids that they can "thank Mr. Bloodhawk" but I think that the moniker might not go over well.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    17. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

      What's your definition of better? The AMD open source drivers are much more stable than the nVidia closed source drivers. They're slower and have fewer features, but they're more stable, in my experience.

    18. Re: Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, if you have to kill X you might as well just reboot. Either way you have to shut down everything you're working on.

    19. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you didn't use the right support channels. Someone's supposed to take you seriously because you buy a bunch of custom whiteboxes and run an unsupported system on them?

    20. Re: Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when morons run companies. You basically switched to an inferior product just because of one bad email conversation. Awesome.

      This message brought to you by Comcast. Comcast: Cram it, peasants, your time is worthless and your pain amuses us (tm).

    21. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I don't know what distribution you are using, but that is all handled transparently and effortlessly for every distribution I have used in the last five or more years. (See also DKMS.) It sounds like you haven't tried a decent Linux distribution in quite some time.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    22. Re: Specific and Custom Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Lol, if you have to kill X you might as well just reboot. Either way you have to shut down everything you're working on."

      There is plenty of stuff that still runs when X isn't running, even if you don't have your own custom software running (e.g. chron jobs, etc. or something infinitley more complex). Suppose a system is also a gateway. Can you really not see that there is a big difference between restarting X and rebooting a gateway?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    23. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I've been using Fedora ever since Fedora Core 6. Does that count as "decent?" And, as I mentioned, the repackaged binary blobs, aka akmod-nvidia, are in the third-party rpmfusion repo, but only because they don't (and can't) fit Fedora's rather strict licensing requirements. The only way you can tell that they're working is that the first time you boot it takes somewhat longer because it takes time to assemble the appropriate kmod for it. No user intervention, no booting into a CLI, no extra reboot. Even Ubuntu doesn't manage that. (My sister uses Xubuntu. When she boots into a new kernel, it asks permission to install third-party software; once she agrees, it reboots, does the dirty work and reboots One More Time. The only good thing about it is, all she has to do is click OK; she doesn't need to know the rest of the process.)

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    24. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. Excellent! I accept your admission that you were lying then. (I also use Fedora, and you and I both know your bullshit story about all this effort on the part of the admin being involved is exactly that; bullshit.)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    25. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I take it, then, that you've never tried to install the nVidia drivers using the .run file downloaded from the OEM's website. I did, once, and quickly learned my lesson. Never again. I don't use nVidia to get the best results on games, because I'm not a gamer; I use them because they work well and, with akmod-nvidia working I can get the eyecandy I like with a minimum of fuss and/or bother. The only time I've ever needed to remove and reinstall all of the nVidia stuph is when I've upgraded the card, because as long as the card doesn't change, the rpmfusion drivers Just Work.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    26. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      100k desktops is really not a lot, especially over more than 10 years. That is 3 hardware refresh cycles for one org or 25k seats and 2 for an 11k seat org (I work across a couple of organisations). You can add close to 10k servers to that too.

    27. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I take it, then, that you've never tried to install the nVidia drivers using the .run file downloaded from the OEM's website.

      Many, many years ago when that was the appropriate course of action I did that. It worked fine for me, but then I actually knew what I was doing. Again, it has been more than five years since it was normal to have to do that.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    28. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is why you should treat all customers with respect even if you can't help them. It is impossible to know the influence or decisions they have the right to make that could well effect you down the road. It is also why you don't allow arseholes to be customer facing as a few wrong words can cost your company a lot.

    29. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      And FYI, we don't tend to rely on reviews of other people. Vendors generally provide various builds and submit samples of those builds together with costings to us. We then put them through our test lab with our builds for developers, designers and general workstation usage testing compatibility with all our software and hardware devices. generally at the end of that we have a hand full of suitable machines that meet cost, spec and performance requirements and then it is a matter of getting in a room with the various technical groups to make decisions on which one. The only people that really use idevices are a few execs and I would say that that has significantly diminished over the last year or two, it tends to be Android and Surface devices for the main part now, Even in the phone arena iphone is a relatively minor segment now with most moving to Android (though we do support whatever the user wants to use phone wise)

    30. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had any stability issues on any of my machines running nVidia cards and I am running a variety of hardware from an optimus laptop to an SLI rig and haven't had a single crash in years.

    31. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Now that I think about it, that kind of makes sense seeing as you're dealing with that large a number. I'm just gonna get 'em the latest iDevice. They've got Chromebooks now. But, the iDevices have good support for schools and they're what the district uses. They've also held up *very* well in the past - kids can find creative ways to abuse them. So, I guess I'm just gonna do that *unless* IT has a specific recommendation.

      100k is quite a few by my count. Then again, I've seen people who have more "seats" than that. Gotta throw my geek-card off to the side for a minute and say that I'd absolutely hate that. I think that, at that scale, I'd go bonkers.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    32. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I would agree, as a general rule. I'd even extend it to other areas of your life, as a general rule. You're probably right - but there are times when I just can't pretend to respect the person I'm communicating with. So yeah, you're probably right but there are times when I've been unable to do so - they're rare times but they do happen from time to time. There have even been times when I, or one of my employees, has fired a customer (so to speak) though I guess those were done in fairly respectable fashions.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    33. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I edited my post and ended up forgetting to put my expression of gratitude back in. It made me think of a slightly different route which I may try. I might have him pick a few models of things that he likes (give him permission to make some orders with my name at CDW) and let him pick. I am able to trust him. So, I'll probably do that - actually. I'm sure he'll thank you. That's about the closest I can get to what you're suggesting and what does make the most sense. We used to buy a few, test them, and then roll 'em out - when we did things like refreshes. The vendors used to actually take the test boxes back, I have no idea if they still do that sort of thing. I seem to recall Sun, back when we used their workstations and lots of server room stuff, used to just ship 'em over. That was years ago. (I retired in 2007, 2008 and I was completely gone.)

      So, thanks. My sincere thanks are given. I am duly impressed and have come up with a plan based on the best way I can think of to implement what you've suggested. I used to read those whitepapers all the time. I think I used them more as a list of things to not buy than I ever used them to pick what to buy. I did end up going with a company called Juniper based on one and a resulting talk with some salesmen. They were pretty good guys then.

      Anyhow, seriously, thanks. 'Tis rarely said around here but I make it a point to. I'm kind of surprised that I'd forgotten to add it back after editing it. Ah well.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    34. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Who told you that installing nvidia drivers on Linux requires a reboot? Some random Windows user? Or did you make that up yourself just now?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    35. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Who told me that installing the .run file from nVidia required a reboot? The instructions on their website, every time I've looked. Granted, that's not been for several years, but I've seen comments from other users on support sites that confirm that it's still true.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    36. Re:Specific and Custom Linux by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I've been using the .run installers for a couple years. Works great for me. Takes about 2 minutes, which is plenty fast enough for something I might need to do every other month or so.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  10. Custom distro by manu0601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So we have a custom Intel distro to have better Intel support and a custom Nvidia distro to have a better Nvidia support.

    What about if I have a system with Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU and I want to get better support for both?

    1. Re:Custom distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post cuts to the heart of why this is a bad idea and should be modded up IMHO.

      My perspective: Intel and NVIDIA increasingly see themselves as competitors vs. complimentary product providers. Intel saw the writing on the wall which is why my laptop has "Intel HD Graphics" and NVIDIA realized that rolling an ARM core with their GPUs gave them a unique competitive advantage.

    2. Re:Custom distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't install either of them. One is for embedded devices and one is for big iron.

    3. Re:Custom distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you buy Denver SoC based, low power workstations and servers with NLINUX and bundled development tools? The sound of Silicon Graphics is in the air.

    4. Re:Custom distro by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Then you use Windows :-)

      LordWabbit Ducks and runs for cover

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    5. Re:Custom distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install Windows.

    6. Re:Custom distro by Holi · · Score: 1

      No one is for Big Iron, the other is a hoax.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    7. Re:Custom distro by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Nice Red Herring. All kernels are already optimized for Intel CPUs (assuming correct .config options at build time). If you are mixing Intel GPUs and NVIDIA ones, then I guess the question is? "Why the Fsck are you doing that?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re:Custom distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptops (Optimus) comes to mind. Those mix intel and nvidia GPU's all the time.

      CUDA development also comes to mind. CUDA has a dumb limitation where you cannot use the debugger on a program that's been launch on a card that has an active display on it. In which case you absolutely must use the onboard display.

    9. Re:Custom distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to get the NVidia extensions sufficiently audited so the they become Clear as well, and can then be joined to the Clear Linux.
      --
      This message was sponsored by the Church of Scientology, the sole provider of services and products to get yourselves Clear, and a faithful stock holder and provider of employees for the Intel corporation.

  11. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should focus on their drivers (same with ATI). I'm fine with Ubuntu.

  12. Just a screenshot? by omnichad · · Score: 2

    With just that screenshot to go on, my first guess is a GUI-based driver installer, not a full blown distribution.

  13. Will they supply source code for the drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could be a boon for them if they are actually willing to open source the driver code for the platform in addition to whatever GPL'd code they are required to post. I'm guessing this OS will be free to use but costly to license if you want a peek at the driver source code. Count me as pleasantly surprised if this distro is fully open.

  14. 2016 is the Linux on the desktop year! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amirite?

  15. Everyone's assuming this is for gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, this is probably for CUDA work.

  16. In house testing version. So what. by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I tend to think it's just made up. But even if it isn't then it is more than likely their own in house beta testing version.

    Just be grateful it's not FreeBSD which they they could totally embrace and not have to release any code for.

    But everyone needs to get it through their heads that the true future of gaming is not OS bound. The need to instead concentrate on visualized GPU infrastructure. Games will run in VM's in a client game OS. More than likely nVidia wants it's own so it's not dependent on Steam as well as allowing them to have their own store and builtin DRM. They are just playing with their own platform.

    Microkernel VM, Multiple windows version, SteamOS. nVidia OS, and multiple Linux systems and entire visualized applets.

    On an aside I am actually more surprised that VMWare hasn't tried to team up with AMD. AMD could create specialized CPU extensions that speed up Virtualization and before you know it VMWare could supplant Microsoft as the default software loaded on all systems by default. Microsoft might not be happy with $10-30 per computer but I think VMWare would jump at the billion dollar increase in revenue and increased name recognition.

    1. Re:In house testing version. So what. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly AMD isn't exactly the population option to start with. Start tying it in with VMWare which some love and some hate and what you will see is AMD and VMWare invest billions to slowly diminish their market share, especially when Intel jumps in bed with MS to do the same thing but better and faster.

    2. Re:In house testing version. So what. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Steam as well as allowing them to have their own store and builtin DRM. They are just playing with their own platform.

      The companies are idiots if they think I want my games on tens of platforms.

      (I'm ok with the occasional Origin/Uplay bundle but I totally wouldn't get the game there if I could have it for the same price on Steam.)

    3. Re:In house testing version. So what. by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just be grateful it's not FreeBSD which they they could totally embrace and not have to release any code for.

      Why would I be grateful?

      If they did this for FreeBSD and kept all the code private and too themselves, how am I any worse off than I am right now? What did I lose?

      Whats that? I didn't lose anything because I never had that new code they wrote for FreeBSD?

      What else? You're just an ignorant GPL fanboy lying about code being 'closed' and spreading FUD? Yea, I saw that already.

      Games will run in VM's in a client game OS.

      You want some drivers for your VMs so you can have drivers for your OS and the VM it runs in?

      More virtualization IS NOT THE SOLUTION, IT IS A SYMPTOM OF THE PROBLEM. People virtualize things because their OS fails at its basic task of separating applications into their own containers. If OSes weren't such a disorganized mess (Example: Linux throws EVERYTHING into /usr/bin /usr/lib ect so everything you install has to work together or conflicts with each other, i.e. Linux is actually more of a DLLHell offender than Windows which actually HAS defined a space for non-system types of code ... people still install to the system directories but its not the right thing to do.

      In linux, writing to the system directories for any random binary or config ... thats totally normal and expected ... and pretty stupid. Maybe Linux should steal this from FreeBSD? 'man heir' on a FBSD box and learn a few things about why no one wants to write commercial software for your fanboy OS

      No you need drivers for your OS so that it can work with your VM ... and your hypervisor needs drivers to work with the OS it runs in ... or hardware directly. So now you've just got another piece of software that needs drivers ... you've just doubled your software maintenance effort and gained nothing at all except slower performance.

      Good job on using a VM there, brilliant.

      On an aside I am actually more surprised that VMWare hasn't tried to team up with AMD. AMD could create specialized CPU extensions that speed up Virtualization

      . . . You do realize that every CPU that matters for virtualization ... HAS INSTRUCTIONS TO SUPPORT VIRTUALIZATION ... right? If AMD just started now ... they'd be way behind ... but they, just like Intel, started adding hardware virtualization support right around the 386 time period, but from the way you're thinking, hell everyone had extended page tables (which is a big speed booster for virtualization) and hardware/PCI virtualization support back in 2009 ... so you might even say that they did this already ... YEARS AGO.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:In house testing version. So what. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its just an inhouse testing thing, they don't have to release any code, period.

    5. Re:In house testing version. So what. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "If they did this for FreeBSD and kept all the code private and too themselves, how am I any worse off than I am right now? What did I lose?" - Emphasis Added

      Well, to start with, there is a temporary suspension on your use of the words to, two, and too :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:In house testing version. So what. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "In linux, writing to the system directories for any random binary or config ... thats totally normal and expected ... and pretty stupid. Maybe Linux should steal this from FreeBSD? 'man heir' on a FBSD box and learn a few things about why no one wants to write commercial software for your fanboy OS"

      For system wide stuff it is normal, and for user specific over-rides they go in the user directory, which is sound security, makes perfect sense, and oh yeah ... you sound like an idiot claiming there is something somehow wrong with it. Calling Linux a "Toy OS" makes it clear how amateur you actually are.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  17. Re:Would I be interested in nvidia's version of Li by Wahakalaka · · Score: 2

    I certainly would be if it could replace the malingering "games-only" Windows partition.

    --
    The truth is somewhere in the middle.
  18. awesome idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    lets further splinter a platform with far too many forks and distros and reinvented wheels and fads of the week and abandoned projects and etc etc etc

    no wonder the year of linux on the desktop keeps getting postponed.

  19. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    I haven't been following the desktop development, but NVIDIA has finally been stepping up with their Tegra 210(TX1) development. ARMV8 is awesome. Considerable progress has been made with mainline integration. For the longest time they were stuck on kernel 3.10. I'm glad they finally got it. Once they get the xhci driver merged I think they will be golden, but they have an nasty pinmux in the way complicating things.

    Too bad steam for Linux will probably never work on ARMv8.

  20. Hell No by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    Nvidia struggle to make a stable driver, who the fuck thinks they can handle maintaining an entire OS. Steambox looks to be a relative disaster and I have far more faith in them being able to do it then Nvidia.

    1. Re:Hell No by kuzb · · Score: 1

      There's no struggle - the drivers work fine. Far better then the opensource alternative too.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    2. Re:Hell No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot sure has become a bunch of pussies over the past couple of years. You can't even get NVIDIA drivers to work? How pathetic is that?

    3. Re:Hell No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how pathetic are you that you don't even know the difference between working and stable. thankfully pussies like you don't get to make technical decisions

    4. Re:Hell No by nnull · · Score: 1

      As I write this, 4k support is still broken. Displayport audio doesn't even work for my system (Works great in Windows). And as of now, I have to downgrade my drivers to 352.63 because the recent Nvidia drivers completely break anything connected to a 4k screen for me. Hell, 4k support has been broken since 2012 with both Nvidia and Xorg. Xorg still hasn't even found a solution for MST displayport without doing some hackish thing to get it to look right while Nvidia even acknowledging the issue way back years ago. Meanwhile, load up Windows, all is good.

      And then SLI? Don't even need to go there, still broken as hell and everyone knows it.

    5. Re:Hell No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the Windows Drivers from NVidia are quirky. Not always, but enough to cause problems from time to time.

    6. Re:Hell No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try upgrading to Windows moran.

  21. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think it's a fair point. nvidia can do all they want to improve graphics performance, but that's nowhere near enough to warrant a whole new distro, with all that entails. Best case, nvidia will be saddled with keeping their project up to date with non-graphics-related advances from other distros. What's more likely (assuming this turns out to be a non-starter) is that the graphics part will be worked on for a few months and then the entire project will be quietly shelved.

    nvidia should just stick to what they know and, given the spirit of FOSS, share it as widely as the lawyers will allow and let everyone deal with what they do best.

  22. Driver Support by SpottedKuh · · Score: 1

    Why do I have the strange feeling that if NVIDIA were launching their own distro, the NVIDIA graphics driver wouldn't work on it? ;)

    1. Re:Driver Support by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Yeah... maybe Nvidia should learn to release stable drivers on Windows before going on a Linux adventure.

      "Nvidia display driver has stopped responding---" *crash*

    2. Re:Driver Support by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Even though I keep seeing posts from people claiming the nVidia's linux driver is unstable etc etc, I've always personally found it to be rock solid, and thats been always true across many different hardware platforms/distros.
      The only thing I've ever had problems with is nouveau. And those problems are large and frequent.
      Annoyingly, all distros now seem to install nouveau just because its open, yet nouveau is still very unstable and far less functional than nVidias driver. Many distros also stupidly make it suprisingly difficult to uninstall nouveau and replace with the official nVidia driver.

  23. Hoax by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a hoax. I modded it down in Firehose and am pissed it made the front page. That screenshot is from some page on NVIDIA's site, with an edited header. This is a non-story, and it should be blatantly obvious by now they have no interest in Linux interop.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  24. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by exomondo · · Score: 1

    Would I be interested in nvidia's version of Linux?

    No.

    Wouldn't that depend on what it is? Seems a pretty silly move to dismiss something without even knowing anything about it.

  25. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    Nvidia have a really poor history in even being able to maintain drivers or basic software support, I think it is more than fair for the Answer to be NO. It is up to Nvidia to prove it has capabilities that are better and beyond what it has publicly shown in the past.

  26. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems a pretty silly move to dismiss something without even knowing anything about it.

    If it's good enough for the US Senate, then it's good enough for anybody.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  27. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seconded. I only visited this thread to post the exact same thing.

  28. New Shield varrient incomming? by ZeroSerenity · · Score: 1

    Instead of Android, Linux? Just a guess.

    --
    For those who seek perfection there can be no rest on this side of the grave.
    1. Re:New Shield varrient incomming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except android IS linux, so is IOS, MacOS being FreeBSD is close enough to almost count as well. Basically, anything NOT windoze is some variant of *nix.

  29. fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's fake, find the differences:
    http://i.imgur.com/59VWO7a.jpg
    https://contests.nvidia.com/share-every-win-need-for-speed

  30. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Real question is why the fuck should anyone be interested with it? They have no history of reliable software let alone reliable OS development practises. Linux already has more forks and distros than you can poke a stick at and the last thing we need is yet another distro struggling to keep up further watering down the resources available to improve things.

  31. Thanks by Sayam16 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the great post.........

  32. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    Maybe not running as such, but there is a fair chance it may lead to better drivers for nvidia hardware.

  33. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    You know windows has a command line and powershell, OSX has terminal as well.

    As a windows admin I really don't want to lose one of my most useful tools.

  34. People who are really serious about software... by bazorg · · Score: 1

    People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.
    Somehow I thought this quote was from Jobs during his first time at Apple Computer inc.? wow. I haven't had a Mac since 2005 and the distortion field is still strong... (source)

    More on point, it seems that not only it is true that hardware+OS+applications are a good way to make money, the control over more of these 3 is a good insurance policy against the other vendors closing down app stores or their hardware on you.
    I certainly don't mind that NVidia, Steam, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Samsung, Nintendo, Sony and mr Goatse all have separate app stores and compatible hardware to go with them, I just hope that in the future it will be possible to play games and use applications/files across platforms without having to own several consoles and owing monthly rents to each of them.

  35. Ninnle Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Ninnle Linux is real?

  36. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Novell? Do you mean SCO-unix of their totally sucky server software? But you are correct; comand line interfaces are NOT the MMI of choice for people with poor memory and a short attention span.

  37. Linux still has a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I think some things have improved with Linux and gaming. Its a long way from being mainstream option for most gamers. Until you start seeing most top title games ported to a Linux system, you won't see a big migration to Linux gaming. NVIDIA to me is steering itself into a dedicated device gaming platform much like a console alternative. I don't think this is to augment the PC gaming industry. To me this only fragments gaming on PC's even more, and maybe the writing is on the wall for Nvidia that PC gaming is dying out.

  38. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course since I don't want to use the CLI, I must be incompetent or from Gen Z. You would be wrong on both counts since you failed to notice that I mentioned an IBM 5150 which would show my age and not mention that I talked about Novell which hasn't been a main stream NOS for some time now. When you can't discuss someone's opinion then just move to insult them. Is that how you work?

  39. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by KGIII · · Score: 2

    Not that anyone asked but I'd boot it up in a VM and test it out. Not for any good reason but because I've done it to just about every distro out there at one point or another. I might as well do this one too. Why not?

    So, yeah... I'll test it out but it's *really* unlikely to become my main distro. Why? Err... As I've said many times, I am not a gamer. The gaming market lost me when they promoted Fallout Tactics as both good and the spiritual descendant of Fallout and Fallout 2. I've not really gamed since then - I was pretty livid and I hold a grudge. Trust is hard built and even harder recovered.

    I've wanted to play the new Fallouts. I guess one of them (maybe more) is more an FPS so I didn't play that. I just can't seem to figure out those newfangled joysticks with the extra sticks on 'em. (I'm old.) I did buy a game a few days ago. I've not even installed it. I bought some game called Wasteland something or other. Yeah, I was high at the time.

    At any rate, I'm guessing that's what this distro would be geared at and thus it'd be unlikely to be my preference. So, I'm unlikely to turn it into my main distro or even use it as anything other than a VM test to say that I've at least tried it once. I do wonder if it'll be butchered like what Google has done with the Linux kernel or if it'll be easy to drop replacements in, compile one's kernel of choice, and if it will even be a Linux-in-spirit type of thing. I suspect that one will be able to do those things though they might try to make it more difficult than it need be.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  40. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that depend on what it is? Seems a pretty silly move to dismiss something without even knowing anything about it.

    Given that it is (if I understand TFA correctly) supposed to be Steam-friendly, and be supported by nVidia, there are a couple of assumptions that can be made:
    - It will be based on Ubuntu, with gratuitous privilege escalations and more solid security measures that takes a little user understanding all turned off.
    - It will rely heavily on WINE and running 32-bit Windows software in an emulator-like environment.
    - It will not have LTS. You won't be able to install it on older hardware, and future upgrades might require hardware upgrades.

    It might be fine for consumers, but I doubt that any Linux enthusiast will look this way.

  41. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

    Then you can keep your dirty mouth shut when people are complaining about the shitty opensource video drivers and game support for linux. But yeah, I'm not interested in it either, Nvidia lost me as a customer awhile back. I might get bored and spin up a test box, if this every actually comes out. But.... the only proof is an unsourced fucking screenshot. Would anyone be interested in "you're an idiot" distro? Just let me photoshop up a screenshot.

  42. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by jofas · · Score: 1

    Fallout tactics? That was 15 fucking years ago! No one cares why you can't be bothered to look into ANYTHING else since then. But besides that temper tantrum you put up about your grudge against the gaming industry, the reason "trying this distro out in a VM" won't help you is that (if it exists), it will rely heavily on proprietary drivers and be focused, as you mentioned, on GAMES. How well do you think VMware or vbox will support this kind of acceleration?

  43. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Oh, I'd only be testing it for usability, ease of updating, access to repositories, the DE workings, and things like that. Not for gaming. I thought I made that abundantly clear. Maybe not.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  44. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

    ...I've seen some rather insightful comments from you...this isn't one of them. As an analogy, what you're essentially saying is this:

    Oh look at this highly specialized and optimized drill tool that turns screws in no time flat! I can screw down these boards in half the time it would take to nail them down. But I have no use for screws, so I'll just turn it around around and see if it still works like a hammer on this line of nails. Oops...would you look at that. That line of nails completely demolished the tool where it doesn't even work on screws anymore. What a piece of crap this thing is.

  45. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Heh, no... No it's probably not one of my best. I don't think I articulated it well.

    The gist of what I'm saying is that, even though I'm not really a gamer any more, I'd still look at it in a VM. Why? I've tested pretty much all the major distros and minor distros in a VM. I might as well test this one. There's a chance, albeit a small one, that I'll like it. I'd like to see how it works, what it has for weaknesses, how easy it is to configure, and then I can make an informed opinion about it - and I might even be able to speculate as to how other people would see it.

    I doubt, very much, that I'd use it to do anything other than test it. But, I'd like to know what it's about so that I can speak from some experience if asked. (Assuming it comes into being.) Rather than make an uninformed opinion about how it's bad, not worth the time, or sucks - I can see for myself what the weaknesses and strengths are and judge accordingly.

    The alternative is that I can just wildly speculate that it's awful (or good) and that anyone who disagrees is wrong. If I conclude that then I'd like to be able to give real reasons for it - reasons that are based on actual use. Checking the usability, ability to modify, resource usage under default non-gaming load, desktop environment, and things like that? Those are things I can/could/would do. Then I can actually opine without making shit up and based on personal experiences.

    There's also the slim chance that it'd be motivation to get back into gaming. I keep trying, thinking about it, and considering it. I just never get around to doing it again. I was really disappointed with Fallout Tactics but that was more the straw that broke the camel's back than one thing of its own. I was really disappointed but it wasn't just with that one particular game - that one game was the culmination.

    Meh, I'm probably still not articulating it well.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  46. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Warma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you actually just post to rant how little you care of the distro, because you turned your back on gaming after a single company betrayed you 15 years ago?

  47. AMD by butchersong · · Score: 1

    I'd be more interested in a distro maintianed by AMD that would assure me their infinitely more frustrating drivers work without a hitch.

  48. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    So, without interest in gaming, you'd be testing a Linux distro that is focused on gaming... why?

    That's like buying a 2-door sports car and being disappointed that you can't haul a yard of gravel in it.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  49. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    Don't worry. A week after it's released, there will be 20 forks of it with bitter squabbling over which is best.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  50. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    You know windows has a command line and powershell,

    No, he likely doesn't know it--because with Windows, there is never any need for 99.99% of people to ever use it.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  51. Shared Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think most of your arguments are ill-founded, but I'm not going to touch the bit about VMs. The person you replied to is an idiot, but your arguments against VMs are also pretty stale.

    That said: yes, Linux uses shared libraries. Yes, this occasionally causes problems. However, the whole point of having distributions is to have a set of package versions that are known to work together. I don't know that I've ever run into this issue without I was using an out-of-repo package, and if so I would certainly report it as a bug. The use of shared libraries is a tradeoff that allows Linux distributions to be half the size (or less) than a comparable Windows installation. Any nontrivial problem in tech is going to be a tradeoff of some sorts, and this one mostly falls on the maintainers/developers rather than the end users.

    However, while you are more likely to encounter this situation on Linux than on Windows, you have more tools to be able to work around it. Setting LD_PRELOAD appropriately can be a useful workaround, or symlinking $bad_version.so to $good_version.so, and if all else fails there are various container-type strategies which let you isolate part of your system and fill it with only the required libraries.

    Writing to the system directories for binaries or config is not particularly normal in Linux, and doubly so if you consider /sbin to be more "privileged". Also there's a push towards stateless systems, which means even less screwing with stuff outside the user-writable directories.

    people still install to the system directories but its not the right thing to do.

    I'm not going to get into the difference between how BSDs and Linux are distributed, which you should know as well as I. Linux uses the Unix Filesystem Heirarchy as well, and I haven't seen any third-party installers which use anything other than /opt or /usr/local/bin.

    Linux is the most popular OS on this planet; the Linux kernel runs on more devices than any other. If it continues to not have much desktop marketshare I will be pretty happy, but nothing you've said has much of anything to do with that.

    You write and think like an angry teenager. If we ever need a new APK around here we'll know where to look.

  52. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not write a better file and print manager for Linux?

    Windows 10 doesn't need quotes around "evil". It's just fucking capital Evil. You should look into all the bullshit it does, and how little control you have over it.

    But go ahead, be a privacy-free botnet node. Revel in it. Post shit that is indistinguishable from shill content. Go right the fuck ahead sir, it's your life.

  53. Re:fake by chepati · · Score: 1

    Someone please mod this up.

    When I saw this story on phoronix yesterday, my first thought was "Well, this is phoronix, the rumor mill of linux/foss news; it's to be expected". Michael has been known for posting any unsubstantiated rumor du jour that is circulating the internet at the moment in a blatant click grab.

    So I concur -- this is fake until Nvidia provides download URLs for ISOs and source.

  54. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "Meh, I'm probably still not articulating it well."

    It isn't that you aren't articulating things well that is the issue here (regardless of if you are or are not doing so), but rather that what you propose is completely stupid. NVIDIA is a hardware company, and their distribution will clearly be optimized for NVIDA hardware. Using their distribution and then virtualizing away their hardware is like buying a special bra designed to handle DD Breasts and getting breast reduction surgery down to C Cups before trying it out.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  55. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "I think it's a fair point. nvidia can do all they want to improve graphics performance, but that's nowhere near enough to warrant a whole new distro"

    The 1990s called, and want your understanding of modern GPU architecture back. Yes. NVIDIA makes Graphics cards which do things like display an image on a monitor. Those cards also also a a whole lot more these days. For example, with CUDA one can leverage the GPU(s) for everything from Bitcoin Mining to Facial Recognition.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  56. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "... with Windows, there is never any need for 99.99% of people to ever use (The Command Line Interface / CLI.)

    Nothing is more sad than the ignorant proudly proclaiming their ignorance and their dedication to holding on to it :-( That is completely untrue. There is often a need, but since the people don't even know it is an option that need goes unfulfilled. For example, if you wanted to remove the Windows 10 related Updates you need to get a tool and run it from the CLI (realistically speaking, as it would take hours or even days to sift through manually), however since most people didn't know how to do that, they lived with the intrusion instead, eventually got sick of seeing the warnings, and accepted the throat-jamming instead of running the CLI Tool.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  57. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Wasteland 2 is a pretty good game. It's not really a Fallout game, since the feel is slightly different, and it doesn't share things the SPECIAL system. But it is an isometric post-apocalyptic RPG, and well worth playing. Especially if you already happen to own it.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  58. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by DeBaas · · Score: 1

    Rather than make an uninformed opinion about how it's bad, not worth the time, or sucks - I can see for myself what the weaknesses and strengths are and judge accordingly.

    I think you kind of missed the point of /.

    --
    ---
  59. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    So, without interest in gaming, you'd be testing a Linux distro that is focused on gaming... why?

    Because he's not quite dumb enough to think that "focused on" == "only usable for"?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  60. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    I realize you can afford to get into gaming retail/steam/etc, but with Steam's Family Sharing* I can share my slightly obscene library with you to try out a wide assortment of old and new games if you like. It's all 100% above board and a nice way to legally try before you buy (a friend of mine has a library about double mine and I have tried quite a few games that way on his - saved me from a couple bad purchases :)); you've got my email, just ping me if interested.

    Games are fun & you seem to occasionally have a little free time on your hands :) Also, in the past 15 years, indie games have exploded and the variety of games out there has never been greater (in my experience, I've been PC gaming since the mid-80's)

    * Before anyone mentions 'he's not family', it's officially for family and guests and I checked, there's nothing against sharing with friends - in fact, the FAQ specifically mentions sharing with friends, though it is implicitly worded.

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  61. Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by exomondo · · Score: 1

    I dunno about that, if you want the best graphics performance on Linux the choice is still nvidia.

  62. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I may very well take you up on that offer. ;-) I do appreciate it. Speaking of gaming, did you end up getting into KoL? It's addictive... If you do *and* you'd like to, err... Hmm... If you'd like to experience what it's like to have some goodies, I'll be more than happy to find my login and hook you up. I've got millions of meat left (I'm pretty sure) and/or I might have some rather rare things kicking around in my inventory. I've got a whole bunch of stuff, including familiars that are hatchlings (unused so can be transferred) that aren't available any longer, that sort of thing. Well, not by the store one can't buy them. Players sell and auction them.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  63. I wouldn't say that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's UWP's got everybody spooked. I could see nVidia firing a shoot or two here. Microsoft makes hardware after all. Sure, they'd probably just let Intel do it, or maybe buy somebody like Power VR, but hey, it'd be childs play to kill nVidia. They're pretty much completely dependent on Widows right now outside of a few high end workstations for engineers/mathematicians.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  64. Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Your generous offer is also appreciated; I played it 2 days & found it quite reminiscent of L.O.R.D. or LOtGD (links more for anyone else reading, I suspect you are familiar with at least the first of those) - moreso the latter (more on that in a moment). I played L.O.R.D. a lot in its heyday. The thrill of playing a multi-player game with friends scattered across town was a new one in 1994 and I was an age (18) when the social aspect really appealed to me. Fast forward 14 years, discovering LOtGD brought back a lot of memories and I even played it semi-regularly (was at a job that had fixed break times [don't miss that!] and it was something I could do in the arbitrarily assigned 'me-time'). Despite this, it wasn't really the same thing (in no insignificant part because I wasn't the same) and after 6 months or so I completely lost interest (my original friends weren't playing, I was older and in a different phase of my life, etc) and though I picked it up one more time a year or so later, I lost interest even quicker this time.

    Playing with friends (and/or when I was younger and more social), I think I would really like KoL, but right now with as many things competing for my attention as exist, the only reason Slashdot gets to stay in my routine is I periodically read something that is quite useful to learn. And that's good, too, because I'd really miss it.

    I do still game, but I'm more selective in what games I spend time on than I used to be and the only multi-player that appeals to me anymore is playing with my kids. Since I game in Windows, quite a few of my titles are Windows-only, but I do have a lot of multi-platform (Win/Mac/Linux) games, so just let me know if/when you're interested (it's an open invite, anytime).

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  65. Optimus support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this finally mean there will be a distro that supports OPTIMUS technology OOTB with proprietary drivers (not nouveau BLEH!) without all the usual black screening, black listing and all the other fucking around that I have to do each time I do a new install of an OS?

  66. I see a steam store competitor coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing I haven't seen mentioned is a new store. On android tablets with Nvidia chips they have their own store populated with things that will be compatible. I can certainly see Nvidia doing this on Linux as well as android. I will certainly give it a try as long as it isn't locked down it could be a good base for those of us with Nvidia hardware that want to game.