Slashdot Mirror


D.C. Regulators Approve Exelon's $7 Billion Takeover Of Pepco (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from WashingtonPost: District regulators approved a $6.8 billion merger between Pepco Holdings and Exelon on Wednesday, creating the largest publicly-held utility in the country. The merger means that Pepco will now be absorbed by a company with the largest number of nuclear reactors in the country and widespread operations throughout the mid-Atlantic, Midwest, and New England. In voting 2 to 1 to approve the deal, the D.C. Public Service Commission said it "was in the public interest," noting that it would deposit $72.8 million in a "customer investment fund," set aside $11.25 million for energy efficiency and conservation programs targeted toward low-income residents, and carve out $21.55 million for pilot projects such as modernizing the electric distribution grid. "These benefits, among others, would not be available to District ratepayers if the merger is not approved," the commission said in a statement.

61 comments

  1. Low.income programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... Low income people, with their free or otherwise illegally connected power, are reallllllly concerned about energy efficiency.

  2. free money? never happens!! by xlyz · · Score: 2

    Guess who eventually will pay for that $72.8 millions?
    No gift is worth a reduction in competition. Will we ever learn?

    1. Re:free money? never happens!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      72.8 million
      11.25 million
      21.55 million

      Talk about petty cash!

      Higher level management in the new company will get that and more in annual salary.

      Those numbers won't even pay the costs to open the spreadsheets.

      Do the phrase "smartest guys in the room" ring a bell?

    2. Re:free money? never happens!! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      No gift is worth a reduction in competition.

      This doesn't reduce competition, because the service areas don't overlap. Each company is already a local monopoly.

    3. Re:free money? never happens!! by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      This doesn't reduce competition, because the service areas don't overlap. Each company is already a local monopoly.

      It makes the new entity a much larger force politically, which can have a negative impact of future regulatory decisions.
      Also, it makes it harder to get away from the company.

      Since this "they don't overlap" argument was already trotted out for the cableco mergers, let me say that if I really didn't like my Internet service offerings in my area, I wouldn't call and bitch about it to the Tier 1 tech support agents who literally can't do anything about it, I would move. It's harder to do that if the provider owns a much larger swath of the country, though.

    4. Re:free money? never happens!! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      The utility companies can't negotiate content deals (something to give them leverage against i.e. Viacom) nor throttle your service (leverage against consumers) nor anything analogous. Utility rates are only negotiated with local governments who are only concerned with their specific jurisdiction, and no other jurisdictions come into play at any time in that process. Likewise, how big or small the company is doesn't have much of an impact on anything.

    5. Re:free money? never happens!! by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      It does, however, benefit the companies' economies of scale. They can operate bigger more efficient plants for neighboring areas, and get a full picture on energy distribution for grid build-out plans. Also important, they can implement larger projects without as much risk which is useful due to the high upfront costs of renewables deployment.

      This is one area where regulation has been pretty successful, at least where I'm at. Profit margins and prices of power are limited where I'm at so a power company can't go chasing a dream.

    6. Re:free money? never happens!! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Yeah keep thinking it doesn't eliminated competition. I guess you missed the line about rates increases.

    7. Re:free money? never happens!! by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Except that out there they still have to deal with PJM. Both PEPCO and various Exelon/Constellation owned utilities all go through them so I don't think there are really any economies of scale that can be gained at this point.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    8. Re:free money? never happens!! by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      They probably don't get that much in annual *salary*; compensation, probably, but at those levels only a sucker makes that much money from salary instead of, say, stock options.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  3. They never expected to have a problem... by spywhere · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the Exelon side, but Pepco was totally blindsided by the commission's original ruling. They were in meetings, watching the vote live, and they had no fallback plan in case it didn't go through.
    The Pepco folks are surprised it appears to have gone through now, and they wouldn't be shocked if something derailed it at the last moment.

    1. Re:They never expected to have a problem... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      If Pepco was surprised by the deal being rejected the first couple of times, it certainly helps to explain why they're the one being absorbed.

  4. They'll weasel out of that $72/$21/$11 million by AnontheDestroyer · · Score: 1

    Or come close to it. Like telecoms who promise to build out rural internet, they'll just not pay, then claim some BS hardship, and pay a team of lawyers and lobbyists 1/10th of the price, buy up politicians via small 5-figure campaign bribes/donations, and ultimately knock all that down like $6 million.

    1. Re:They'll weasel out of that $72/$21/$11 million by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or come close to it.

      They don't need to weasel out of it. $72+$21+$11 million is nothing. That is a rounding error on one month of Exelon's revenue.

    2. Re:They'll weasel out of that $72/$21/$11 million by whh3 · · Score: 1

      All of this is very interesting, especially in the context of D.C.'s recent dealing with WalMart. The council agreed to let WalMart build supercenters agreeing to increase in minimum wage in exchange for their promise to build some stores in food deserts. Then, low and behold, WalMart said that the economic conditions would no longer make it possible for them to build the grocery stores in those locations after they already built the ones that they figured would be profitable.

      Washington post coverage

      "Fool me ... won't get fooled again."

      --
      remove nospam. to email!
    3. Re:They'll weasel out of that $72/$21/$11 million by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      What a one sided article...

      DC raised the min wage already and is planning to raise it again.

      The conditions under which the deal with the City was made no longer exist. You can't expect Walmart not to redo the math after the terms change.

      This is why the city probably won't sue, the lawyers will say "yea, you can probably force the issue, but only if you grant an exception so Walmart doesn't have to pay the new higher wages or pay into the family leave fund."

    4. Re:They'll weasel out of that $72/$21/$11 million by whh3 · · Score: 1

      You absolutely can and should expect them to be true to the deal. It's not that they did not know their was a risk of "the math" changing.

      Plus, it wasn't the terms of the deal that changed. It was their misread of the economy. Not the city's fault.

      --
      remove nospam. to email!
  5. Re:We need COMMUNISM NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good news comrade, you have options. Move to China or Russia.

    If those options are unappealing to you for any reason, shut the fuck up. Your needs and desires are not important to the whole.

  6. Nothing more than a bribe by HundyCougar · · Score: 0

    I can't see how this isn't considered a bribe...

    1. Re:Nothing more than a bribe by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Oh it's not. This money is going to the public. The real bribes involve government-industrial revolving doors and payments to obscure banks and holding companies in third world countries. You'll never see the real bribe amounts published, or to whom they were paid.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  7. Pepco sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being from the area, I think outsiders really need to understand how bad Pepco is..

    Pepco named first on the list of "The 19 Most Hated Companies In America"

    EPA sues Pepco for polluting Anacostia River

    1. Re:Pepco sucks. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      What matters is what your Congress critter thinks.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  8. ha by roman_mir · · Score: 0

    the only interesting part of this as always the fact that government de-facto is allowed to be involved in any at all trades by companies and individuals. It's despicable. It's despicable that people who were born in the country that was based on the principles of individual freedom are still more than OK with governments controlling trade, business, labour, pricing, money, interest rates, anything at all that governments really shouldn't be involved with at all.

    1. Re:ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Ms. Rand, but individual freedom does not apply to American corporations (unless you're speaking of campaign contributions, but that's another matter). The last time utilities were allowed to run free and unregulated, we got Enron. I'd rather not see another one.

    2. Re:ha by davester666 · · Score: 1

      that is because, over and over and over and over, businesses, particularly big businesses, are more than happy to do ANYTHING to make an extra buck.

      Dump mercury/arsenic/anything they don't need into sewers, storm drains, barrels they throw in the dump, nearest river or ditch
      Predatory pricing/monopolies/cartels/price fixing
      Not paying wages, hiring people to beat up/kill union workers/strikers
      Tax Evasion
      Just recently bankers were caught fixing international interest rates [libor? sp?]

      That's how businesses get "regulated". They SO EGREGIOUSLY kill, cheat, steal, evade that the gov't has to step in. Or else people would have to just show up and start shooting the executives.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you born this stupid or was it a lifestyle choice? Inquiring minds want to know. Mostly so we know exactly what hell has in store for you.

    4. Re:ha by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      Go back to Russia ass-hole.

    5. Re:ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roman's is not an unusual case. He grew up in the Soviet union and bought into their line about being a "socialist" state when there was nothing socialist or communist left in the state philosophy by the time he was out of diapers. He then got out of the country and latched on to the philosophy that he believed to be as far away from that of the soviet ideals as possible, without realizing that he was actually making himself into a giant fascist in the process.

      Now he spends most of his free time here trying to draw people in to the Church of Ron Paul. Ironically he does this while lying about being an "atheist".

  9. Re:We need COMMUNISM NOW! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 0

    Obama says Cuba is mondo cool! And you can swim there from Miami!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  10. Thank god! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

    When I first saw the headline, I thought it read Pepsico. I was afraid they'd now screw up Mountain Dew. Having realized my mistake, I am resting easier now thank you.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re: Thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also Mountain Dew is already ruined.

  11. corruption by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    In other words, they simply increased the depth and breadth of bribe money thrown around the beltway and the deal got done.

    There isn't any incentive for them to "modernize the power grid" so I can only wonder what that's a code word for. I suspect it means something like "make the necessary upgrades in their corner of the grid so they can move power around between their own generation sources to reduce their own costs."

    1. Re:corruption by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      Many utilities operate on a "cost plus" model, so there's actually a huge incentive to modernize the grid, or basically incur as much cost as the regulators will let the utility get away with. Even worse, when the regulated arm engages in expansion or modernization, it contracts with its unregulated "utility construction services" arm.

    2. Re:corruption by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      In other words, they simply increased the depth and breadth of bribe money thrown around the beltway and the deal got done.

      There isn't any incentive for them to "modernize the power grid" so I can only wonder what that's a code word for. I suspect it means something like "make the necessary upgrades in their corner of the grid so they can move power around between their own generation sources to reduce their own costs."

      You assume this isn't the reason politicians go into politics -- to get in the way of business so they can get paid to get back out of the way.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Modernize the power grid" means installing smart meters so they can dispense with meter readers and impose their nanny programs on you about energy usage which they can now track in detail. Nanny programs which IMO will eventually lead to surcharges for what is considered "excessive" energy use. I say this as a customer who has very inefficient baseboard heating in my apartment, and I get regular nanny message from them about how my usage is higher than normal.

      Oh, and after they install smart meters they will come back in 2 years and want a rate increase to pay for them. This just happened in Baltimore, $15/month in perpetuity to pay for them, i.e., 24 months out it becomes pure profit.

  12. I thought Exelon was nuclear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Exelon was the company that owned a bunch of nuclear reactors. Why buy a power company with no nuclear reactors? I don't see any synergies.

    1. Re:I thought Exelon was nuclear? by spywhere · · Score: 1

      Pepco is a power distribution company: it has not generated any power since they sold all their power plants to Calpine in 2010. Exelon is buying retail customers for its generation output.

    2. Re:I thought Exelon was nuclear? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the generation and market side of the companies has to be treated separately. In that area of the country PJM handles the the bulk electrical market and transmission and even there the network people are kept separate from the market people. The network side is concerned with ensuring reliability of the grid market people be damned while the markets side is concerned with meeting the network demand at the lowest price. Across the country there are other large companies like CA ISO, ERCOT, MidWest ISO, TVA, etc that all fill a similar role to the one PJM does.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  13. Has a politican ever not claimed public interest? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    I think in the vast majority of situations, the politician says what he does is good for the public... Whether it is or not.

  14. Gee whiz by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    "carve out $21.55 million for pilot projects such as modernizing the electric distribution grid."

    What a concept, a utility company "carving" out money to maintain the system they have a monopoly on. People wonder how our national infrastructure got into the horrible shape it is now...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Gee whiz by dj245 · · Score: 1

      "carve out $21.55 million for pilot projects such as modernizing the electric distribution grid."

      What a concept, a utility company "carving" out money to maintain the system they have a monopoly on. People wonder how our national infrastructure got into the horrible shape it is now...

      There are a lot of ways that could go down. Maybe external parties want to implement systems that the utility doesn't think are important. Just as an example, smart meters that can control AC units in the event of a power shortage. In some parts of the country, there is a solid case to be made for installing such equipment. In other areas, it might be completely frivolous.

      The article uses the term "modernizing", not "maintaining". You're reading your own bias into it. Without knowing all the details that is just speculation.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    2. Re:Gee whiz by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      Point well taken. The area I hail from has PG&E, and they instituted smart meters some years ago, and then promptly let go of several hundred workers who previous walked the neighborhoods reading meters in lieu of one guy in a truck driving thru at 15 mph reading them automatically. Immediately following our switch, my monthly cost went up $20/month. When I called on PG&E they claimed that the old meters were not as accurate, and that they had been under-charging us for many years. On a side note I don't want PG&E to have access to my AC or any other device in my house. If there is a power shortage they could go get the big businesses and building owners that leave the lights on 24 hours a day/7 days a week, and get preferential rates for doing it.
      In the long run you are probably correct, who can imagine a utility voluntarily spending money to maintain the infrastructure implemented and paid for by tax payer money, when they can just rake in the profit and then petition for state/federal money to do upkeep and maintenance.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  15. Who is that and why do they have so much money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should be introduced, clearly, before saying they are trading money with each other which does nothing for us that don't have billions in cash.

  16. Chasing volume to cover up past mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one time Exelon was a good pure-play in nuclear power, which they produced at under 1 cent/KWH according to the 10-K. Then they got involved with Constellation, probably though it was a bargain to get into the natural gas -fueled power biz. But of course the price fell further on the gas side and they wound up with depressed stock prices, probably killing the execs' bonuses. This is likely a ploy to redo the numbers and get them their bonuses back. At least the dividend is still decent. For now.

  17. Close ties to Obama administration by rsborg · · Score: 0

    Obama, Axelrod and others from his administration and presidential campaign worked for Exelon.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  18. cha ching by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    "...it would deposit $72.8 million in a "customer investment fund," set aside $11.25 million for energy efficiency and conservation programs targeted toward low-income residents, and carve out $21.55 million for pilot projects such as modernizing the electric distribution grid."

    So basically these companies bought off the regulatory commission to the tune of some 100 million that will probably never make it to the slated end projects.

    Is there any level of American government that can't be bought?

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  19. Full-court Press apparently delivered. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . . because for months, after the initial and second disapproval, you constantly heard commercials with paid shills, excuse me, Local Concerned Citizens extolling the virtues of the merger. I'd be curious to know just how large the advertising budget was for the PR effort. Likely, in the millions of dollars. Which makes you wonder, just how much will Excelon be making, that they can shell out all this coin JUST to be the local electric utility. . .

    1. Re:Full-court Press apparently delivered. . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they'll be able to get rid of Pepco's entire high-level, highly-paid management structure. There are millions/year right there that can instead be given to Exelon's investors... I mean... CEO. Sorry. Typo.

      But seriously, all kidding aside, it's called economy of scale. Being a larger utility means having more generation, more grid, more distribution points, and most importantly, less need to buy and sell energy on the open market, which is a non-ideality of the energy market that costs everyone money, ultimately passed to the consumer.

      Owning a larger grid of your own means you can more effectively decide how and where to generate, and where to carry it.

    2. Re:Full-court Press apparently delivered. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. Perhaps not. I'm sure Pepco's senior management negotiated deals as well. And economies of scale can also mean more room for feather-bedding. Ask any "member" of the Rappahannock Electric Cooperative. Technically non-profit, but electricity prices have doubled since they bought my area from for-profit Appalachian Power. But I get a pretty-but-utterly-useless magazine from them, every month, that they won't stop sending, even if requested, and send you an automated, animated presentation explaining why your power bill is so much more than the previous month. Because, apparently, they don't think that people understand that, when it gets hot and you turn the air conditioner on, you use more power, and thus have a higher bill. /boggle.

  20. Re:We need COMMUNISM NOW! by chrish · · Score: 1

    Americans need to learn the difference between communism and socialism. They're not the same thing.

    --
    - chrish
  21. If you have a congressperson! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which we don't in DC. Well, we have Ms Norton, who gets to vote
    in committees, but that's it. No senators, no real congressperson.

  22. Re:We need COMMUNISM NOW! by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

    Neither of those countries could really be considered Communist anymore. Oh I know China still uses the name and still has the party, and some things remain nationalized, but it's a vast oversimplification to label them Communist anymore. Of course I'm speaking purely economically, not about their system of government or the amount of political freedom.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  23. Trust Busting by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

    Where's Teddy Roosevelt when you need him?

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  24. Re:We need COMMUNISM NOW! by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    Americans need to learn the difference between communism and socialism. They're not the same thing.

    True, they're not the same thing. Just the same in the way that really matters: some people are, by disposition, born being slaves to other people who, by disposition, get to own them. The more productive, innovative, and hard working you are, the more of a slave you are required to be. If the usual apologists for mere socialism are correct, then you're just a bit less of a slave in that more watered down version. Sort of like being kind of pregnant, I suppose.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  25. I don't get it. by jdharm · · Score: 1

    Why would an oil company buy a soda/restaurant company?

  26. Cheney energy plan comes to fruition soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exelon buying Pepco means that nearly all the aging GE BWR nuclear plants (that had their licenses to operate extended decades past their planned end of life) are owned by the same company now. That company has consistently failed to put aside decommissioning costs as originally required by law (but, now, forgiven by the same administration that extended the licenses, and no longer required). The end game is a nuclear accident at whichever plant fails first, followed by a taxpayer bailout that will make the funds being spent to fix TEPCO's Fukushima blunder look like chump change. These guys are seriously planning to get rich off of a nuclear accident. Not kidding. They've gone well out of their way to arrange for one to happen, by cutting staff and maintenance at plants that make Fukushima look like a model of safe operation. Thanks to the Cheney energy policy, they literally cannot lose.