USB Trojan Hides In Portable Applications, Targets Air-Gapped Systems
Reader itwbennett writes: A Trojan program, dubbed USB Thief by researchers at security firm ESET, infects USB drives that contain portable installations of popular applications such as Firefox, NotePad++, or TrueCrypt, and it also seems to be designed to steal information from so-called air-gapped computers. "In the case we analyzed, it was configured to steal all data files such as images or documents, the whole windows registry tree (HKCU), file lists from all of the drives, and information gathered using an imported open-source application called 'WinAudit'," the ESET researchers said. The stolen data was saved back to the USB drive and was encrypted using elliptic curve cryptography. Once the USB drive was removed, there was no evidence left on the computer, the ESET researchers added.
I just like it when it's air gapped..
I lost my USB drive. I wrote a program that automatically backs up my computer when I plug it in (of course encrypted). I guess they found it.
Oh well.. what sounds like free-form obfuscation improvisation to me turns out to be, once more, the state of the art in today's heists.
I makes a copie of the /etc directory.
Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
That depends, does Linux and BSD finally support USB drives?
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
ok, that was funny
How does the trojan get installed on the USB stick in the first place? Either you are using USB drives provided by a stranger (who does that?) or someone has stolen your drive, installed their software, and replaced it without your knowledge. Plausible, but not a great way to propagate this to more than a few specific people.
In fact, FOSS is ideal for airgapping any apparatus, on account of all its open bits and such.
Reminds me of IPoAC
I had the info stolen off my computer last year. The thieves who took it are now slightly dumber for having read it.
Ah yes, I remember attempting to set up wifi on both RedHat and OSX (BSD based...)... both were over-zealous in supporting air-gap-based security
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
Let's assume for a moment you've hijacked a USB dongle, you've gotten a ride onto an airgapped computer. ......now what?
Are you going to write a visual basic GUI to trace all the IPs simultaneously or something?
So you've taken over a standalone PC. Huzzah. You've haxxored the boxen.
What are you doing with the data you've stolen?
Did you realize that you now have to snag another ride back OFF the machine via another USB stick, ride someplace else, infect THAT machine, and hope it isn't airgapped too, in order to get out again?
Depends what that hacked computer does and what your objectives are.
A couple examples:
You don't need to get data off the system for your malware to do harm.
tbh I have been a Linux user far to long to not belly laugh at this.
I have had several machines that were quite effectively "air gapped" by default installs that didn't support the latest whiz-bang onboard network out of the box. Nothing quite like the realization that you need to upgrade your kernel to use the network in order to upgrade your kernel.
In fairness though, I have had it happen on Windows installs as well.
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
But does it work in Linux?
systemd unit files.
Have gnu, will travel.
Let's assume for a moment you've hijacked a USB dongle, you've gotten a ride onto an airgapped computer. ......now what?
Are you going to write a visual basic GUI to trace all the IPs simultaneously or something?
So you've taken over a standalone PC. Huzzah. You've haxxored the boxen.
What are you doing with the data you've stolen?
Did you realize that you now have to snag another ride back OFF the machine via another USB stick, ride someplace else, infect THAT machine, and hope it isn't airgapped too, in order to get out again?
It sounds beatable just by write protecting the USB device if TFA is correct, so not 100% but very capable.
Taking a leap, I see it as a specialized piece of software looking for something in particular, this by images and the broad term of documentation.
To download images from almost anybodies system would put a dent in the capacity of the USB device (even if just from a browsers cache). It doesn't sound like it would be that obvious and more selective at what it took.
Or I'm giving this malware just way too much credit.
Wasn't HKCU just one part of the "whole windows registry"? In win98 it was, anyway.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
My favorite, with windows, is when you get the system fully installed with all its crap OEM junk, try to rebuild it with a clean install, only to find out nothing in the whole system works without downloading some special snowflake driver.
Hell my recent build and windows install was almost good.... ASROCK had on board utlities to make a usb stick with drivers.
Snag? Oh yah, the drivers they distribute trojan your machine with adware....right out of the box on a fresh build, the fucking motherboard drivers infect you with adware! Windows users have nothing to smug about.
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"