Slashdot Mirror


Heavy Social Media Users 'Trapped In Endless Cycle of Depression' (independent.co.uk)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Independent: The more time young adults spend on social media, the more likely they are to become depressed, a study has found. Of the 19 to 32-year-olds who took part in the research, those who checked social media most frequently throughout the week were 2.7 times more likely to develop depression than those who checked least often. The 1,787 US participants used social media for an average 61 minutes every day, visiting accounts 30 times per week. Of them a quarter were found to have high indicators of depression. "One strong possibility is that people who are already having depressive symptoms start to use social media more, perhaps because they do not feel the energy to drive to engage in as many direct social relationships," said Dr. Brian Primack, director of Pitt's Center for Research on Media, Technology and Health. "People who engage in a lot of social media use may feel they are not living up to the idealized portraits of life that other people tend to present in their profiles. [...] This would be concerning, because it would imply that there is a potential vicious circle: people who become depressed may turn to social media for support, but their excessive engagement with it might only serve to exacerbate their depression."

110 comments

  1. Speak for yourself! (Part 1 of 12) by HumanWiki · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was trapped in depression cycles back in USENET!!!! Pssh.. social media...

    1. Re:Speak for yourself! (Part 1 of 12) by plover · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but my Karma is Excellent!

      --
      John
    2. Re:Speak for yourself! (Part 1 of 12) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least back then brevity was the norm. Not the 140 character type response but connectivity was not cheap so words had meaning.

    3. Re:Speak for yourself! (Part 1 of 12) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was trapped in depression cycles in slashdot! Oh... right... I'm still here. Well... this is depressing.

    4. Re:Speak for yourself! (Part 1 of 12) by dow · · Score: 1

      It's okay, you almost certainly won't get trapped on a single site for very long. No-one could last out more than three or four years I would guess. That would just be... depressing.

  2. Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effect by dunkelfalke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It could just as well be that depressed people feel lonely and try to connect to others at least this way.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  3. Scat-Book by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Oh look,

    *This* shit again...

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    1. Re:Scat-Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer F***book.

    2. Re:Scat-Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat a fan of "Faustbook". From the Sinfest webcomic.

  4. chicken by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or egg?

    1. Re:chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about "you're a fucking illiterate buffoon"? Is that an option?

      The fucking summary says, and I quote:

      "One strong possibility is that people who are already having depressive symptoms start to use social media more."

    2. Re: chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But ... another possibility is: egg

  5. Ignorance by messymerry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ignorance is the best therapy for depression. Turn off the TV, kill the Internet for an evening, sit down with a good book or a movie (no ads!!!!) or play a board game with the kids. Orrr, go outside to a dark place and look at the sky. There's a million things to do that don't involve being in everybody's face constantly.

    Also, FB is a feedlot. What happens at a feedlot? The sick get weeded out and the rest get slaughtered.

    Be warned...

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    1. Re:Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the endless cry of "they're going to kill us all!". Very well reasoned and informative.

    2. Re:Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize it was so easy to treat depression. You should write a book.

    3. Re:Ignorance by plover · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize it was so easy to treat depression. You should write a book.

      The problem is that everyone who would benefit from it is too ignorant to read it.

      --
      John
    4. Re:Ignorance by Kohath · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aerobic exercise is good for depression.

    5. Re:Ignorance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yup. Now, try to get someone with serious depression onto an aerobic exercise program. There's several things that are good for depression that being depressed makes much more difficult.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:Ignorance by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Depends on the depression, I guess. The therapy working best for mine is sertraline + bupropion in varied amounts.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cattle prods work well. So do restrictions on things like internet access, entertainment, money, or even food for failure to comply. Even certain drugs, if you don't mind side effects.

      If you think I'm joking, understand that depression is rarely something a person recovers from on their own. It usually takes something outside pushing, and pain is a great motivator.

    8. Re:Ignorance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm going to suggest that pain and deprivations aren't great motivators to get over depression. Hurting depressed people is going to lower their already bad self-esteem, and is likely to result in a further collapse.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is about as helpful as saying not having cancer is good for cancer.

    10. Re:Ignorance by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Or they might rebel and discover they're not as powerless as they previously thought. I'm sure their family and friends already tried the being supportive route, so if that's not working, why not try something different? Maybe a drill sergeant is what they need.

    11. Re:Ignorance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. That might make them go ahead with the thoughts of suicide they've been having. Problem solved.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's entirely possible that people who were already depressed for other reasons turned to heavy use of social media as a coping mechanism.

    1. Re:Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks dude. It's a good thing you're here to remind us of that - otherwise, nobody would have noticed the fifth sentence of the fucking summary.

  7. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by david_thornley · · Score: 2

    It seems safer. Going into real physical company has its risks, but social media are more under control. If the depressed person is fearful of a rejection, he or she can delay reading it until he or she feels up to it.

    Being on social media has got to be better than no human contact, but actual human contact would be better. At least you can let someone know you care through social media, and that's got to be worth something.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like being a 30 year old virgin and watching everyone on the internet getting it on 24/7 to send you into a depression spiral.

    1. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your facebook feed must have a lot more excitement than mine. I am always bewildered at how prudish and conservative the people on my feed are. With the exception of a few "special cases", of course.

    2. Re:Sounds about right by bmo · · Score: 1

      You're picking the wrong "friends"

      Weed out the prudes or at least create an alternate account without prudes. Facebook 'requires' real-names, but that doesn't mean you have to supply one. Just contact the friends you want to include in the new account that it's you. Just pick a name that won't trip Farcebook's "bogus name" filters.

      I find that the sexually stuck-up people are usually stuck-up about a vast majority of things. They're boring people, in all likelihood.

      It's like when you're dissatisfied with the current group of people you hang out in real life - you stop going to the conventional places and start going to things like AS220.

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even need fakebook for that.
      This is could be a normal saturday night discussion when out with my friends.

    4. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with boring? Some of the most interesting people I know (travels, work and life experiences) have very boring lives. Eg, friend from school who, with no prior experience, built a boat and sailed around the world after college. Is now is a teacher and leads a quite happy simple family life.

    5. Re:Sounds about right by bmo · · Score: 1

      You can have a quiet simple happy life and not be boring/prudish.

      I think the point is that there are people who insist that /you/ be boring too, or that there's something wrong with what you like.

      These kinds of people are called busybodies, and they are a scourge on humanity.

      --
      BMO

  9. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's as if the fifth sentence in the post should say: "One strong possibility is that people who are already having depressive symptoms start to use social media more..."

  10. My curiousity by mitcheli · · Score: 1

    I'm curious how much brain chemistry is affected by social media and whether or not the addictive cycle has anything to play in this area. Certainly there is compulsion involved, and with any typical 12-step program, there's the identification of compulsion used to create powerlessness. Are we powerless to stop checking Facebook or looking to see what replies our comments garner? Am I to surrender the replies to this post to my higher power? ... Well, while you ponder that, I'm going to go chew on my fingernails and hit the refresh button a few dozen times.

    --
    Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    1. Re:My curiousity by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      It has been found that heavy users of social media have become deficient in both vitamins I and Q. Total avoidance of social media has helped some return to normal levels.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  11. Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you base your entire self-esteem upon the likes/dislikes of near-random strangers you may or may not know, sure, you're bound to have issues.

  12. Lack of hobbies by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd be willing to bet that the correlation here is due to these people not having many, if any, hobbies, so they spend a lot of their days browsing social media and not getting out a whole lot. This, combined with the likelihood of seeing their friends on social media going out and doing fun and interesting things probably compounds the problem.

    1. Re:Lack of hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it boils down to all these people sit on facebook and youtube and the like and see nothing but OTHER PEOPLE having more fun than they are, or they have a better car, more money, are better looking, have bigger boobs (and/or swizzlestick), etc.. it gets them so depressed they aren't able to pick their sorry asses up off the chair to do something about that.. so they just sit online, look at the other people more... and get even more depressed.

    2. Re:Lack of hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm willing to bet you've never been depressed and are just making random guesses. You're got it backwards. I've been so depressed I've attempted suicide twice (yeah, I failed at life and failed at death). When you're deeply depressed, nothing feels good. There is no such thing as happiness, at least none that lasts more than a single moment. Everything, everything takes far more effort to do and everything is pointless. Hobbies take too much work, too much effort, and you get no enjoyment out of them. Worse, you may remembering enjoying it but continuing those action no longer brings that enjoyment or excitement. If you used to have hobbies you won't continue them because they're all pointless extra work with no benefits.

      Turning to social media makes you feel like you're doing something without having to spend any energy actually doing something. You can pretend you're being social (and why has society deemed that's the thing to be? Other cultures prefer quiet self-reflection rather than gossiping about nothing), catching up with people, making connections, etc... as you get further behind in whatever it was you actually need to be doing. Now you've got even more stuff that you've failed to do so you get more and more depressed. Maybe you're hoping one of your 'friends' will notice and help you out, but you don't have the willpower to ask directly and most people will say something insulting like "why don't you smile more" or "go have fun"*. When you're incapable of feeling any enjoyment you can't "go have fun" no matter what you try to do.

      So yes, depressed people don't have hobbies. But they're not depressed because they don't have hobbies, they don't have hobbies because they're depressed. The world is better off without you, so where and why are you going to find and spend the energy to build something when you're just going to fuck it up anyway? At least on social media you could potentially help someone else. I wasted my time reading Facebook and trying to help people on r/depression and the suicide watch reddit forms instead of helping myself.

      *Technically you do need to do those things, but simply stating them is fucking insulting as hell and most people don't tell you the how. Why aren't I smiling? Because I have nothing to smile about you asshole. I don't have some perfect happy little life like you do. Why should I have to put on a show for you just so you can pretend the world is a wonderful place full of happy people? Instead of telling someone to enjoy something, take them out to a park or a zoo, someplace outside during a sunny day. Don't ask them to go, plan the entire trip yourself then tell them you want them along and they're going and don't take any insults personally. Take them along for the ride and don't force them to make any decisions ("I've never eaten at XYZ, how about we eat there"? instead of "Where do you want to eat?"). If you just told someone to 'man up' you better have done the same.

    3. Re:Lack of hobbies by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Hobbies aren't necessarily better, particularly if they don't involve human interaction.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Lack of hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hobbies aren't necessarily better, particularly if they don't involve human interaction.

      I would say that hobbies are unequivocally better than social media of any kind. However, it is true that many hobbies are not a substitute for a deficit in human interaction.

      However, what hobbies provide that being an internet couch potato does not is that they help you define your personality, expand your interests and in general make you a person that someone else might want to interact with. For that matter, they may help a person realize that there is more to life than being validated by other people, and that they are actually don't need more social anything.

    5. Re:Lack of hobbies by antdude · · Score: 1

      Internet is a hobby too. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  13. This is why I deleted Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One day it dawned on me that I was checking facebook once an hour for no real reason, and I couldn't remember the last time it had made me happy. Delete. Haven't missed it.

    1. Re:This is why I deleted Facebook by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I've dwindled to about once a month. Is that also a good reason to get rid of it?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  14. This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    push Facebook so hard.

    1. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Twitter. You can't watch TV for half an hour without seeing some corporation advertise for Twitter.

    2. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And push Trump so hard on it. So hard on it.

    3. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It represents hate which is all their kind lives for.

    4. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about having a platform to push xianism.

    5. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you're not allowed to do anything with having a Facebook account. Even /. Advertises for them.

    6. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. constantly shoves ads for Facebook down your throat.

    7. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And demand that we put the damn @ sign in the wrong place. My boss spit in my face for refusing to put the @ in front of a username.

    8. Re: This is why Republicans... by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      /. has a share on Facebook button but I haven't seen any ads for Facebook itself otherwise. Although their ads might be being crowded out by the targeted ads for light bulbs...

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    9. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Requiring a Facebook account means Facebook controls too much. Controls too much.

    10. Re: This is why Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the ad I'm talking about.

  15. Causal link, but not in assumed direction. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    I propose that what is in fact being observed here is that young adults who are suffering from depression are more likely to turn to social media as an escape or in an attempt to self-medicate.

  16. Science advances! by Livius · · Score: 1

    I think it's great that people are out studying these things quantitatively.

    Of course, no-one is surprised, because the "Endless Cycle of Depression" was pointed out as soon as social media started, but it's always better to have quantitative data.

  17. the summary literally mentions exactly that by Ionized · · Score: 1, Informative

    cmon guys at least try a LITTLE bit. from the SUMMARY -

    "One strong possibility is that people who are already having depressive symptoms start to use social media more, perhaps because they do not feel the energy to drive to engage in as many direct social relationships," said Dr. Brian Primack

    1. Re:the summary literally mentions exactly that by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      Not really, no. It is not even nearly similar to what I have written. Dr Primack thinks that the reason is that direct social relationship is less energy consuming.
      I have written that depressed people can feel lonely and therefore try to find someone to talk on social networks - there are obviously many more people on social networks who are willing to chat (otherwise they wouldn't be on social networks in first place).

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  18. See? Told you so! by kheldan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So-called 'social media' is no substitute for actual interaction, preferably face-to-face, and is just enabling socially avoidant people from getting over their awkwardness and anxiety of social situations. Also, your ten-thousand 'friends' on Facebook? They are not your friends. Do yourself a favor and get some real, living, breathing, live-in-person friends that you actually connect with on a personal level.

    Be sure to read my sigline before commenting, you'll save you and me both time and energy better spent doing something else.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:See? Told you so! by supremebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also doesn't help that everyone seems to post an idealized Brady Bunch version of their family on Facebook. The pictures of the kids are always clean and happy, and the adults are always promotions and shiny new cars. When the reader's lives can't live up to these unrealistic expectations, it just makes their depression worse.

    2. Re:See? Told you so! by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      So-called 'social media' is no substitute for actual interaction, preferably face-to-face, and is just enabling socially avoidant people from getting over their awkwardness and anxiety of social situations. Also, your ten-thousand 'friends' on Facebook? They are not your friends. Do yourself a favor and get some real, living, breathing, live-in-person friends that you actually connect with on a personal level.

      Because all it takes to get over social anxiety is to go out and make friends? That shows just how clueless you are as to the causes and therapy for these issues.

      Be sure to read my sigline before commenting, you'll save you and me both time and energy better spent doing something else.

      And you would be better off without that "fuck you" attitude if you expect anyone to take you seriously.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    3. Re:See? Told you so! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So-called 'social media' is no substitute for actual interaction, preferably face-to-face, and is just enabling socially avoidant people from getting over their awkwardness and anxiety of social situations.

      ^^^^THIS.

      "Social" media seems to be creating a generation of emotionally inept and insecure people who simply do not know how to interact with others except on the most shallow of levels. Most millennials seem to hate talking on the phone and the reason they often give is that it's "too immediate and too personal". They want to avoid human-to-human interaction and send a tweet instead. Anything to create some emotional distance. No wonder their relationships are all fucked up and mostly short-lived and shallow.

      It should really be called "anti-social" media or maybe "contra-social" media, because it's anything but social as far as I can tell.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:See? Told you so! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also doesn't help that everyone seems to post an idealized Brady Bunch version of their family on Facebook.

      Exactly. Everyone is showing their highlight reels publicly but privately living their real life from the bits on the cutting room floor.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:See? Told you so! by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's because they were told that if they went outside then they would get kidnapped or something else bad would happen to them. Hell, kids can't even walk to school today because parents are worried that some sexual predator will get them. Or course now it's some Muslim or terrorist threat added in too. God forbid if they are allowed out to play on their own or head to the playground by themselves. No wonder they stick to the computer or game system as that's all they are allowed.

    6. Re:See? Told you so! by kheldan · · Score: 1
      Did you know I have terrible allergies? They're so bad it's easier to list the things I'm NOT allergic to: Bird feathers and animal dander. I'm allergic to everything else. So rather than stay inside all the time, running air filters in every room, I get allergy shots every week. Most people's maintenance dose is every 2-4 weeks, but I need to get them every week so I can be outside as much as I want to be, and still be able to breathe and not feel like I'm on the edge of anaphylaxis like I used to feel.

      Being avoidant of your problems isn't solving them, it's just running away from them. I don't like getting nasty painful shots in each arm every week, and paying for the privilege, but it's worth it if it means my quality of life is overall better.

      Also, did you know that inside I'm was a painfully shy kid who, if I allowed myself to now, would spend all his time away from people, because it's just that much less stressful for me? But I decided at one point that having social interactions with other people, and friendships, and social time, and enjoying the benefits of social occasions, was so much better in the long run than hiding all the time. It's not anywhere near as hard as it used to be when I was a kid. People are better off getting the social antigen shots in both arms every week, so they can go out in public, meet and connect with people, and enjoy the benefits of it.

      And you would be better off without that "fuck you" attitude if you expect anyone to take you seriously.

      It's not a 'fuck you' attitude, it's just a 'fuck you' to snooty people like you with a victim mentality. Bugger off.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    7. Re:See? Told you so! by Livius · · Score: 1

      Calling it "anti-social" is unhelpful. Social media *is* social, just social at a shallow and dysfunctional level. Calling it anti-social is simply incorrect and it gives people an excuse to stop listening.

    8. Re:See? Told you so! by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Yeah no kidding. They're not even allowed in most places to ride their bikes to school anymore, the schools will specifically not allow it. And they wonder why there's a growing childhood obesity problem: anti-physical exercise culture.

      I'm all against the 'anti-bullying' in theory (I was very much subjected to it as a kid myself), but on the other hand bullies (both kid and adult!) are a fact of life, and not learning how to deal with them as a kid means you're less likely to know how to deal with them as an adult.

      On top of the anti-physical culture problem, there's this 'anti-competition' thing, where kids are playing sports but nobody keeps score? No winners, no losers? Losing makes you 'feel' bad, so we can't have that? No wonder there's such a thing as 'quarter-life crisis' (look it up).

      Between all that and 'helicopter parenting', it's no big mystery to me why kids are growing up to be screwed-up and totally unprepared for adulthood.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:See? Told you so! by Livius · · Score: 1

      Because all it takes to get over social anxiety is to go out and make friends?

      No, that's the goal, not the strategy.

      And no-one is claiming that it's easy.

    10. Re:See? Told you so! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Calling it "anti-social" is unhelpful.

      It may be unhelpful, but it sure seems accurate.

      -

      Social media *is* social, just social at a shallow and dysfunctional level.

      I hear what you're saying (mostly a terminology issue) but there's nothing truly "social" about having 500 Facebook friends, none of whom you've ever met or talked to on the phone or shared a beer with. They're not your friends in any meaningful way. They could be script-bots for all you know.

      Social media is training people to be non-social and, in some cases, genuinely dysfunctional at a basic human-to-human level. Tindr is a great example, where people are reduced to "swipe left, swipe right", without a moment's thought. It's like a game, not a way to connect with someone in any meaningful way.

      I think social media is, in some ways, genuinely suppressing the development of basic social interaction that is the basic nature of human-to-human interaction. It's sad when I see a group of people sitting at a table in a restaurant all bent over their phones, not having any kind of conversation or interaction. In some cases they're sending each other texts across the table, rather than speak to one another. How retarded is that?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    11. Re:See? Told you so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While social media definitely doesn't help the problem, it's not the cause either. There's lots of other factors that make people less social in general. Trust in humanity is at an all time low, despite violent crime also being at an all time low. People are afraid to go out and do things, they're petrified by the news, technology, and all the things they don't understand. Social media is just one of many inadequate band-aids for lack of social interaction. 20 years ago, people would just drink themselves to death in the local bar, now they sit at home on facebook.

      I don't use social media at all, can't stand it. I also hate talking on the phone and I avoid human-to-human interaction with people I don't know. That's been the case my entire life, it's just who I am. That said, I do have close interpersonal relationships, and many of those I made online. In my mind, the reason my relationships succeeded (and the reason social media fails at fostering good relationships) is that they were based on common interests, rather than location or family relations. Some of my best friends are people I met online more than 15 years ago. They live several states away, we chat online all the time and occasionally meet up when we can.

      Social media, on the other hand, starts with real-world relationships and associations. It brings all the worst aspects of social interaction with it. People you can't stand, people lying and gossiping, people putting on faces to hide who they really are. It doesn't focus on interests at all, and doesn't bring like-minded or compatible people together. The result is the same old high school drama BS that people like me hate, widespread depression, and social dysfunction.

    12. Re:See? Told you so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be sure to read my sigline before commenting, you'll save you and me both time and energy better spent doing something else.

      So, what's your sigline? Us unregistered users can't see it.

    13. Re:See? Told you so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How am I supposed to get those live-in-person friends? On an average day, my friends are busy with work, commuting home/picking up their kids, making dinner, family time, helping with homework, getting kids ready for bed, etc. etc. etc. Likewise, I'm busy with those things. The only person I have time to get together with in-person on a daily basis is my husband, because he lives with me.

      If I want to find out when and where the next live-in-person get-together with my friends is going to be - be that a stitch-and-bitch, a convention, movie night at someone's house, or if I want to say "Hey can we get together this Saturday and talk?" - I have to get on facebook. People use it as the telephone of our time. If those people are not my friends then how do I make actual friends?

  19. This is intentional by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    FB and other SM outlets want you at home on FB/SM. Not turning off your device and getting out of the the house. If that takes making you depressed, well...

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  20. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is confirmation of my theory that the more people check your profile, the more vulnerable they are. When Facesuck sends me those "do you know?" messages I know those are usually people that have viewed my page for whatever reason (so, interest). These are people I work on.

    One time my profile was viewed by a horny college chick in a place I have never been but she liked my pictures and spread my awesomeness to others. Fucking hell, I got at least 1000 "do you know" messages, all from hot young college chicks. I got so much pussy because I was the "hot bookface guy", my dick still hurts a year later (maybe I should have that checked out).

  21. oh you mean like it says RIGHT IN THE SUMMARY? by Ionized · · Score: 1

    cmon guys you aren't even trying here! from the fucking summary:

    "One strong possibility is that people who are already having depressive symptoms start to use social media more, perhaps because they do not feel the energy to drive to engage in as many direct social relationships," said Dr. Brian Primack

    1. Re:oh you mean like it says RIGHT IN THE SUMMARY? by davec727 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but every other sentence in the summary vaguely (for varying values of vagueness) implies that the social media use is causing the depression.

  22. Internet Depression by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other news, people who frequently use the Internet see how stupid most other people are.

    Representatives from the National Institute of Health (NIH), United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) all recommend avoiding interactions with stupid people.

    Most importantly, avoid places both real and online, where they may congregate. Specifically mentioned as such dangerously stupid locations are Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Google Plus, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit, Tumblr, Pinterest, Vine and LinkedIn.

    "While you may think that you can help guide some stupid people away from their stupidity, it will only hurt you. Many very intelligent people have tried, driving them to believe this planet is occupied by absolute morons. There are other studies being performed to determine if we have passed the point of idiocracy."

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Internet Depression by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      Most importantly, avoid places both real and online, where they may congregate. Specifically mentioned as such dangerously stupid locations are Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Google Plus, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit, Tumblr, Pinterest, Vine and LinkedIn.

      And Peeple. Don't forget Peeple. Especially stay away from Peeple if you want to avoid really dangerously stupid people.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
  23. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "cycle of depression" typically indicates a situation where an already depressed individual attempts to relieve their depression by a course of action that may have a temporary relief, but just leads to more depression in the long run.

    So yes, they were depressed. Then Facebook made them feel a little better for a few minutes, but even more depressed when they stepped away and had to face the fact that all their friends were indistinguishable from chatbots. So they go back to Facebook and enjoy the feel of remote companionship for a few minutes, then they step away...

  24. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could just as well be that depressed people feel lonely and try to connect to others at least this way.

    This is very probably the old classic "you know the drill, correlation does not imply causation."
    The important questions to be asking at this point is what is causing depression for these people and what is causing depressed people to use social media more than non-depressed people?

    I can propose a hypothesis, that people with problems that affect their social lives tend to hide, and all things being equal hiding behind a social media account that is a made up mask of how we wish we were, and in viewing the masks of others and knowing their own is a lie, can amplify the cognitive dissonance that is at the root of one's own perceived depression.

    This hypothesis is by no means certain, and many other things could explain some of it... like circadian disturbances from using bright screens at night to hormonal stresses being caused by lack of activity and poor diet.. etc..

  25. Wha's the First Rule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes!

  26. Slashdot by sims+2 · · Score: 2

    Does /. count as social media?

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes it does. All forums do, too.

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question. But I'd be inclined to say "No".

      Discussions on Slashdot are topic-centred, and most of us post Anon or pseudonymously, so we don't have to worry about some butthurt moron slashing our tires or putting a brick through the window because they can't handle the possibility that maybe not everyone in the world thinks exactly the way they do.

      The Friends/Foes feature doesn't really count as "friending" in the Facebook--it just reflects how you feel about poster X, and it's entirely possible for someone you call a Friend to tag you as a Foe. And you're limited to 200 relationship tags total, so there's no "I've got more followers" BS.

      You can post only text and links, so there's little opportunity for "my dog's piano recital was better than your dog's piano recital" video/photo war nonsense as well.

      Although matters would be vastly improved were the "old" metamoderation system restored, Slashdot is still designed pretty well to promote interesting and useful discussion, whereas FB and the like are designed to promote dick-waving contests, clickbaiting, trolling, and other manifestations of OCD and negligible self-esteem.

      We get some trash posts here, too, of course--like the idiot claiming yesterday that anyone wearing glasses is doing so only to make some kind of statement other than, "My eyesight's fucked up and needs correction". But things seem to getting better since the end of the Dark--er, Dice Age.

      TL;DR: No, not really the same thing at all.

    3. Re:Slashdot by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      Does /. count as social media?

      No, we're generally tech-savvy here, so it's more antisocial media

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    4. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, and Wrong.

  27. Not surprising by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of the oversharing of the faux 'my-life-is-super-awesome" lifestyles portrayed would be enough to depress anyone, and add to that the sheer volume of brain-numbing bullshit ("press 'Like' to get this child a new kidney!") and it's no wonder that many people's mental processes become clogged with Facebook sludge.

    I noticed this effect years ago when I realized that many of the Facebook addicts I knew were constantly being "one upped" by the constant stream of useless crap and downright false garbage that they tuned in to read on a minute-by-minute basis. Facebook didn't make them feel better, it made them feel worse- lonely, boring, and mundane. They couldn't brag hard enough to make themselves feel good.

    I called this effect "Facebook Psychosis", and now it seems I was on to something.

    If everyone you know is constantly bragging about how AWESOME and FANTASTIC their life is and they have pictures to "prove" it, who wouldn't be discouraged by the "ordinary" life that you, a mere mortal, seems to lead?

    But it's not Facebook's fault per se, any more than it's the bottle of Tequila's fault when someone gets drunk and then crashes their car. It's a contributing cause, but the drunk driver is the one who fucked up.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  28. In other news... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    ...those who check daily to see if anybody has "liked" them on dating websites are 100 times more likely to be depressed!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  29. Idealized Portraits by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    People who engage in a lot of social media use may feel they are not living up to the idealized portraits of life that other people tend to present in their profiles

    I noticed this both in the real world and in the social media world very early on. I noticed how the perception of the profile, the sort of larger than life appeal profiles had on people. It sort of created this hunger, this drive for people to become almost morbidly obsessed by the endless detritus of their online lives. And all those posts, updates, etc that don't reflect reality. The online profile and its affect on people is an interesting thing to behold.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  30. #1 source of schadenfreude by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    One thing I've noticed from recently adding to Facebook several people I went to high school with 40 years ago: all the hot chick in the class now look used up and spit out, kind of like bag ladies, while all the plain girls that couldn't get a date in high school to save their lives still look the same, like they haven't really aged in 40 years. Meanwhile, me and all my male friends are now bald and creepy looking. If only I'd known then how well preserved they would be later, I would have gone for the unpopular girls in high school instead of the popular girls!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:#1 source of schadenfreude by slew · · Score: 1

      ... all the hot chick in the class now look used up and spit out, kind of like bag ladies, while all the plain girls that couldn't get a date in high school to save their lives still look the same, like they haven't really aged in 40 years.

      The flame that burns twice as bright burns half as long. -- Laozi

  31. How Facebook led to World War 2 by retroworks · · Score: 2
    http://www.collegehumor.com/po...

    History of World War 2, if it had been recorded by Facebook

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:How Facebook led to World War 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the most awesome piece of satire I have read in a while

  32. More like depressed people spend too much time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like depressed people spend too much time... on social media.

  33. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by N1AK · · Score: 1

    Being on social media has got to be better than no human contact, but actual human contact would be better.

    Based on what evidence? If anything, what this article suggests is that people who are on social media could be worse off because of it. If social media means people are more likely to cope with a lack of satisfaction in their life by passively viewing social media profiles and less likely to make changes to deal with the underlying issue then there is no reason to believe that social media is better than nothing.

  34. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by david_thornley · · Score: 2

    Social media allows you to communicate with friends, and that's almost certainly going to be good. As far as passively viewing social media profiles goes, there's lots of things on the web you can passively view, or stupid games you can play endlessly. TFS doesn't actually have good evidence that social media causes depression, only that depression and heavy social media use are linked.

    I'm basing this on personal experience and the experience of friends.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  35. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    To be honest, no, not the old classic. I was rather speaking from my very own personal experience.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  36. Re:Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the effe by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

    Social media is the cause, it's been studied before. It hooks users on a system of little rewards. Every random thing in their life can be judged and rewarded with a "like". They become obsessed with getting positive feedback and start over-valuing other people's opinions. Worse still they start to think negatively when they don't get the positive feedback, even if it's just because they posted at 11PM and no one was around to hit that button.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  37. LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liberalism is a mental disorder.

  38. Thanks for speaking up by Latent+Heat · · Score: 3

    Thanks for speaking up and telling us what depression is really like.

    There are times when I tell myself "I feel so depressed!" but it is nothing like what you experience. There are many things I feel unhappy about, many things I am anxious about, but when my primary-care doctor asks me if I am depressed, I say, well no, there are projects at work as well as things at home that I enjoy doing and look forward to very much, so I don't think that I am depressed.

    Thanks again for telling us what depression is really like and offering ideas of how we can help friends or family in that condition.

  39. Re: Maybe they are mixing up the cause and the eff by koomba · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know this is Slashdot and all, so the suggestion to rtfa is somewhat ridiculous, but the lead researcher actually addressed that very point. She said that could very well be the case, and they weren't making a claim one way or the other in that regard.

  40. that's OK by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    I only check anti-social media sites, like Slashdot.

  41. I'm not fat by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Heavy Social Media Users

    I'm not fat! I'm just big-boned. And I hardly ever use social media anyways.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  42. Social media sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because no one cares about what you do.
    I spend a month on my hobby video projects which usually are 3 minute clips. I spend hours on camera movements, color correcting, finding the right location. I am quite proud of it. It is something I do in my spare time. I post it on facebook about 3-4 times a year and write about it. I got 2 likes so I guess someone noticed. Yet when I visit friends or family, people still ask me what I have been up to.
    - Well, I just posted this update where I wrote about how I went up to do this timelapse of a sunrise above the clouds and spent a lot of time looking at shadows on the mountains to find the right spot.
    - You did? I didn't know that?
    - I posted it on facebook, didn't you see?
    - No?
    - Then why the fuck do I waste my time there?

    I still do my my videos and pictures, because I like it and it is a nice distraction from work. I just stopped sharing them since it seemed pointless and people didn't read what I wrote or saw what I posted anyway. And everyday when the work day has been bad or everything in general just sucks, I look at what I have created and I am happy again, and I begin to plan what to do next that is different from what I did the last time.

  43. Sonia Livingstone replies with sense by wendyg · · Score: 1

    LSE prof Sonia Livingstone, who runs the Parenting.Digital blog as part of her research in this area, sprayed some sense on this story: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/parenti...

    wg

  44. What if: Social network users see the real world? by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    What if the issue is that social networkers see a wider variety of people, and in the process see a clearer picture of just how messed up the world truly has become?

    That picture is kinda depressing, if things really are stacked against ordinary people.

  45. Indicators of depression by pommetje · · Score: 1

    Or maybe, the researchers operationalized 'depression' as 'not really doing anything' which would seem like a prerequisite for spending a lot of time using social media. Put differently: I'm lazy and prefer to sit around checking Reddit - ad when I filled out a mental health questionnaire it told me I was depressed. Which I'm not.

  46. Is this a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before social media existed, depressed people would just isolate themselves. It would just be a downward spiral rather than a cycle.