Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Makes Xamarin Free In Visual Studio, Will Open Source Core Xamarin Tech (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader cites a report on VentureBeat: Microsoft today announced that Xamarin is now available for free for every Visual Studio user. This includes all editions of Visual Studio, including the free Visual Studio Community Edition, Visual Studio Professional, and Visual Studio Enterprise. Furthermore, Xamarin Studio for OS X is being made available for free as a community edition and Visual Studio Enterprise subscribers will get access to Xamarin's enterprise capabilities at no additional cost. The company also promised to open source Xamarin's SDK, including its runtime, libraries, and command line tools, as part of the .NET Foundation 'in the coming months.' Plenty of developers will find this announcement exciting. Xamarin being free is a big deal.

143 comments

  1. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is Xamarin? Why should I care about it?

    1. Re:Huh by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      What is Xamarin? Why should I care about it?

      If you have to ask, you shouldn't care.

    2. Re:Huh by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      "With a C#-shared codebase, developers can use Xamarin tools to write native Android, iOS, and Windows apps with native user interfaces and share code across multiple platforms."

    3. Re:Huh by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What is Xamarin? Why should I care about it?

      The Slashdot interface contains a search tool. Try the term "Xamarin" in it. :)

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    4. Re:Huh by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is Xamarin? Why should I care about it?

      If you have to ask, the editors didn't do their job

      FTFY

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Huh by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      What is Xamarin? Why should I care about it?

      Google search for "how to search for information on the Intertubes".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Allows C# devs to write mobile apps for iOS, Android, and OSX. Now C# code can run on Windows, Linux, OSX, Android, and iOS. Java killer, perhaps?

    7. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This place has editors?

    8. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried, not sure knowing the Internet is a series of tubes helps though?

    9. Re:Huh by mrvan · · Score: 2

      What would I need an inner tube buying guide for?

      Did you even check your link before sending it?

    10. Re:Huh by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      gdi, need to cancel a mod point

    11. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xamarin is pretty popular. Maybe you're just out of the game.

    12. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the editors didn't do their job

      It's not the job of the editors to open up your search engine of choice and type "Xamarin" into it. Ask your own questions; don't wait for others to feed you the answers they think you want.

    13. Re:Huh by pla · · Score: 2

      If you have to ask, you shouldn't care.

      Quite the opposite in this case - If you have to ask (and do any mobile development at all), you haven't yet noticed that you have a large asteroid falling out of the sky directly toward your comfortable little picnic.

      Not everyone will use Xamarin, but if you haven't at least evaluated it and deemed it irrelevant to your situation, you need a new career.

    14. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Xamarin?

      That was the first question that came to mind when I read TFS. I think it's either one of Miguel de Icaza's old projects (didn't Evolution come out of that?) or the home planet of one of DC's Teen Titans.

    15. Re:Huh by chris200x9 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know Xamarin is the company behind the already open source mono and the only Xamarin branded product I know of is Xamarin studio which is just a proprietary monodevelop. So I too would like to know what is Xamarin, why is this a big deal, and why should I care?

    16. Re:Huh by arth1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Xamarin is pretty popular. Maybe you're just out of the game.

      Nah, my doctor had me stop taking it, and use Aspirin instead.

    17. Re:Huh by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Nope. But it is their job to include a descriptive sentence (or heck, even a phrase) so those of us who like to keep tabs on a broad range of tech areas don't have to go to an independent web site to clarify such a simple but obscure detail central to the article.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    18. Re:Huh by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Straight out of the opening paragraph. Thanks for that much at least, it's a heck of a lot more than the "editors" provided. I come to slashdot because of the community and the wide-ranging tech articles that keep me keep abreast of things far outside my specific area of expertise. It'd be nice if the editors did their job and offered at least minimal context. Glad to see the community is still taking up the slack after all these years.

      Honestly though, even skimming Wikipedia leaves me uncertain. So, it's a cross-platform app development library? Seems like the sort of thing that could easily have been included in the summary.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    19. Re:Huh by Immerman · · Score: 1

      If you have to go searching for core contextual information on an article, then the editors have already failed, badly. Slashdot covers such a wide range of tech that nobody can hope to keep track of it all, a handful of words offering context is the entire point of having editors - nobody cares about misspelled words or bad punctuation. Well not outside of a few grammar nazis, and we all like to poke fun, but it doesn't really *matter* the way core context does.

      Well, not usually anyway. Now if you'll excuse me I need to help my uncle, Jack, off his horse.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    20. Re:Huh by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I guess I was implying that: if you haven't noticed this asteroid falling from the sky toward the mobile development picnic, you're obviously not doing serious mobile development and therefore should not care.

      Also, there's the "if you can't Google a name like Xamarin and come up with a relevant description of what it is and why you should care" that, again, Xamarin is irrelevant to you.

    21. Re:Huh by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I'm still not quite sure myself what Xamarin is supposed to be after reading the Wikipedia page about it.

    22. Re:Huh by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Okay. But 'share code' sounds like code written with Xamarin can be simply recompiled for multiple platforms to produce complete running apps from a single code base. I'm guessing that's not the case - and it would take some careful reading of Xamarin promotional materials to figure that out. It's not unreasonable to ask someone who presumably knows whether it is or is not.

      Share code could mean little more than 'use the C# language to build your Android and iOS apps'. I guess that's not nothing. But of course, if you already have Android and iOS apps, what they're really offering is the chance to rewrite your code so you can share it with a Windows port - but of course, not the GUI bits, which will have to be maintained separately, and written from scratch for Windows for any of this to make sense. That's less of a winning proposition.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    23. Re:Huh by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 2

      I think that I get emails about it from Canadian pharmacies.

    24. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Xamarin? Why should I care about it?

      What is Microsoft?

    25. Re:Huh by garlicbready · · Score: 2

      Since the article didn't explain things very well

      The people that are Xamarin are also the same people that maintain mono for running .Net apps under Linux
      For a while now they've been making money by selling a product that allows you to run .Net apps under Android and IOS
      The main down side is that it's quite expensive and an additional cost on top of Visual Studio.
      The main up side is that you can write apps for Android or IOS while using .Net and avoiding java

      The above announcement means lots of .Net developers can now write apps for Android and IOS for free if they already have Visual Studio which is quite a big thing and opens the door for a lot of people to write Android apps

      I was kind of expecting this when MS bought up Xamarin recently. Microsoft have been going the open source route recently in a big way with they're new .Net Core which is basically a complete re-write of .Net for 5.0 merging in mono at the same time. The target being the likes of Google / Facebook where you can have lots of websites running on linux boxes with docker isolation to compartmentalize security breaches

    26. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely not, this is supposed to be a news aggregator, not fucking wikipedia.

    27. Re:Huh by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No, it's a news-seeded discussion forum. Failing to respect that is how DICE nearly killed it off. There's dozens of superior news aggregators out there, even ignoring the automated ones. What keeps people coming to Slashdot is the quirky and though-provoking community. As such, summaries that are insufficiently informative to allow people to decide if they want to read the article, much less contribute to the discussion, are counterproductive.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    28. Re:Huh by terjeber · · Score: 1

      If you don't know you are a psych student or a sociology major, so what the fuck are you doing in /.?

    29. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's basically a set of libraries + compiler tools that means you can write a cross-platform mobile app in c#. It wraps platform specific native UI controls, so you don't end up with an ugly lowest common denominator UI (think early Java programs that don't really look at home on any platform). It handles turning that into Android, IOS and WinPhone packages.

    30. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xamarin is a popular way to use C# to make bloated equally ugly mobile apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone from a single codebase.

    31. Re:Huh by soulhuntre · · Score: 1

      Okay. But 'share code' sounds like code written with Xamarin can be simply recompiled for multiple platforms to produce complete running apps from a single code base. I'm guessing that's not the case

      Actually in a fair number of situations that is exactly the case - including the GUI bits. For non-trivial business / news / info apps you can get well over 90% of your code straight compiled with no changes and often you can push that very close to 100%.

      On the other hand, you still retain full access to the underlying OS API and of course for games or apps that want to perform UI tricks and interact with specific hardware features then you will simply isolate that bit of specific code for each device OS.

      it is really good stuff.

      --
      --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
    32. Re:Huh by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Beats thinking it's a convoy of trucks, I guess.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    33. Re:Huh by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      As far as I know Xamarin is the company behind the already open source mono and the only Xamarin branded product I know of is Xamarin studio which is just a proprietary monodevelop. So I too would like to know what is Xamarin, why is this a big deal, and why should I care?

      While mono was an open source project, the important parts of Xamarin run-time were commercialized.
      There was a "free" entry level but it was limited in code size or something like that, so much that the first tutorial I tried to follow was not buildable. After that I decided to let it mature a little, and maybe see if the price came down.

      At least it could be better than trying to wade through the abominable mess that Microsoft have left us with now, with the enterprise-wide workstation freeze on windows 7, a number of prototype projects being attempted on windows 8.1 tablets and phones, developers tied to windows 7 not being able to build and deploy to 8.1, and developers not interested in touching the quagmire in-between and just wanting to go to one common platform for all the devices in the enterprise. Frankly I am unimpressed and disappointed with the mess Microsoft have left us in, so maybe Xamarin will provide the solution to all this, altho I suspect that any app we come up with will still need a build/deploy path for each of the app stores anyway.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    34. Re:Huh by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      Since the article didn't explain things very well

      The people that are Xamarin are also the same people that maintain mono for running .Net apps under Linux

      For a while now they've been making money by selling a product that allows you to run .Net apps under Android and IOS

      I believe parts of the code apply to all operating systems, but the UI parts need to be written for each, as well as various device interfaces and such.

      Also the announcement of making the core parts free may not apply to all the deployment and run-time parts of the product. I wouldn't be surprised if there is still a cost involved in getting an app running on IOS.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  2. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    meanwhile a long list of genuinely interesting stories submitted by well-meaning members fall by the wayside.

    Such as?

  3. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Believe it or not, many here do work in the Microsoft "ecosystem" and so are interested in these things. Also, the non-Microsoft stories far out number the Microsoft stories.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  4. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 0

    There are loads of MS stories on the web, but this suddenly massive quantity of MS stories here on Slashdot is getting in the way of some really interesting geek stories that are not being allowed through for whatever reason. If you love MS stories, there are sites that cater directly to that, but if you want an all-around great geekish-story site you might hopefully continue to get that here at Slashdot if some adjustments can be made by the editors. Further, if there is any sort of policy or agenda to greenlight each and every MS story I hope that honesty will prevail and the truth will be clearly spelled out. If there is no such thing, I hope it will be equally clarified.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  5. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Drink from the Firehose on a regular basis. It is good for seeing some otherwise-buried material. In the last 2 days of this MS PR onslaught there are quite a few interesting stories that got dumped. Too bad.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  6. Re:More useless microsoft vaporware by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

    There's already a beta out for it. Do you know what "vaporware" actually is?

  7. Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xamarin being free is a big deal.

    What was it licensed under before? People paid money for it?

    1. Re: Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by thittesd0375 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was hella expensive before and a very valuable tool if you didn't want to rewrite code from c# to objective c or swift

    2. Re: Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by halivar · · Score: 2

      There was a cheap license for indie devs, but unfortunately the assembly size limitation precluded the use of MonoGame. By just a few KB, to boot. :(

    3. Re:Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Informative

      An enterprise License was just under $2k ($1800 - $1900 if memory serves) per developer per platform (Android or iOS) per year. The next level down I think was ~$1k per platform per year. The License for individuals to be able to have unlimited lines of code, use of 3rd party libraries, and VS integration, among other features was I think ~$30/month per platform. They did have a free option, but you were limited in the size of the programs you could build, couldn't use VisualStudio to build and deploy the apps (limited to Xamarin Studio), and couldn't import external libraries beyond the standard C# imports.

    4. Re:Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been using Xamarin Studio for OSX for a while now and it's always been free. It has allowed me to keep working on a Visual Studio-based mail server solution while at home though it's definitely not as useful as VS itself, falling short on a lot of features. It does have a couple of its own nice features. Out of the box it has a pretty nice NUnit test runner, but I've never found an elegant way to clear the Results Chart on the Test Results pad - an awkward way to do it on a per-test basis is to rename the test, run all tests again, and restore the original test name. Also, the Output tab on the Test Results pad only shows output from Console.WriteLine - output from System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print is nowhere to be found.

    5. Re:Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by mridoni · · Score: 1

      Quite correct, only with the "Indie" version (the $30/month one) you couldn't use Visual Studio, that was restricted to "Business" license users ($1k/year).

    6. Re:Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      Also I believe you needed to buy a full separate license for each OS you wanted to target.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    7. Re:Not trying to be a wiseass, just asking by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      That was the "per platform" part. The only OS (platform) supported without having to purchase a separate license was Windows Phone (since it already has a native CLR that can read .NET). For instance, since my team has two developers that focus work with Android (2 devs, 1 platform), and two developers that work with iOS and some side work for Android (2 devs, 2 platforms), that's ~$12,000 we're spending on licenses. If management provided us with 4 Macs instead of two, then we'd be paying $16k as all 4 devs would be working on 2 platforms each.

  8. How does this impact the license from before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Before, the free tier was limited to pure-CLR, with no calls to Java (on Android) or native code (on any mobile platform). This prevented me from making use of it. Now, I can't find any explanation of exactly how the license and right-to-use has changed. Anyone got any details?

    1. Re:How does this impact the license from before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It will be MIT license, so completely free to use by everyone for everything for every purpose.
      It will be bundled with Visual Studio, which is not free software, although a "gratis" version exist for "non-enterprise" users.
      Other development tools will be able to include Xamarin, Jetbrains new C# IDE will most likely do that.
      And really, anybody could take the pure source and do whatever they wanted with it.

  9. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by hsmith · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It is almost like they have their developer conference going on or something. This site is fucking stupid. Bitch about MS for almost two decades - then they about fave and start open sourcing massive quantities of products and getting software to run on Linux, bitch more.

  10. Java killer by JcMorin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think so, as a long time C# dev, I was stuck to use Xamarin to port my code to other os. Now have it for free, built-in my dev environment it just get better.

    1. Re:Java killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think so, as a long time C# dev, I was stuck to use Xamarin to port my code to other os. Now have it for free, built-in my dev environment it just get better.

      I infer from your statement you have actually used Xamarin to make software that runs on different platforms. I'm interested in a real life example.

      Does it actually work as advertised?

      I read it's now 'free.' For me, it isn't the cost, but the time invested that is of concern. I hate getting a fair way through a project with a system / framework and then learn all the dirty little secrets, tricks and traps that bring it to a crawl or halting all together. Thanks.

    2. Re:Java killer by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm interested in a real life example

      LabNation SmartScope software is (partly) written using Xamarin, it runs on Linux, MacOS, Windows, Android and iOS.

      Link to GitHub.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    3. Re:Java killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm interested in a real life example

      LabNation SmartScope software is (partly) written using Xamarin, it runs on Linux, MacOS, Windows, Android and iOS.

        Link to GitHub.

      Thank you for that.

      On a side note; I've used a little device (name forgotten) that acted like an oscilloscope / trace analyzer for Arduinos. It was pretty slick, the labnation device seems fairly similar. Nice.

  11. Re:More useless microsoft vaporware by InsectOverlord · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, there's a production version. It's currently not free, hence the news.

  12. As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WTF is a Xamarin?

  13. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I am bitching about the ratio of MS PR stories to Firehose submissions having been massively skewed in the last couple of days. I identified that the dev conference is the basic cause, so we agree on that point. THAT's my issue. It is annoying to me, so I bitch about it. I get modded down, I get up again.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  14. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's web page for it doesn't tell either.

  15. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There must be a reason Microsoft refuses to admit what it is.

  16. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that they are afraid to describe this product. They must be ashamed of it.

  17. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fr M looking at Microsoft's webpage, I don't think they know either.

  18. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am bitching about the ratio of MS PR stories to Firehose submissions having been massively skewed in the last couple of days

    Kindly actually calculate this obscene ration you are talking about? I'll be it's not anywhere near what you perceive, you are just overly sensitive to MS stories because of your bias. I'll bet that the facts will show an amazing small number of MS stories given their market share in the tech world.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  19. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because their marketing department is completely clueless.

  20. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there anything they make that they shouldn't be ashamed of?

  21. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Isca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft is a 800 lb gorilla still. When they make a large, sweeping move that affects the world of developers, it will be covered. If Oracle was to offer a free version of their SQL database that was fairly full featured but limited in memory like SQL express, it would be all over the news. But aside from Apple, Google and Amazon, very few companies can make changes that affect as many people as they do, and you certainly don't see successful tools become free or get ported to other operating systems that were always (and still are) in the competing column.

    Microsoft's announcements are not normal announcements. There's a few other big companies that could do things that generate this much press but quite honestly very few of them have as much impact as what Microsoft does. The motto of this website is "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters". It certainly fits the first bill, and for a vast majority of us who deal with the microsoft ecosystem on a daily basis (and sometimes even enjoy certain products) the moves that they have made are not only news...

    ...but they also matter quite a bit to us some of us..

    However these same people do not usually complain about the release of yet another point patch for Ubuntu, or the release of a new flavor of tool. Those that do operate under the microsoft umbrella increasingly embrace other tools as well, and while we might not click and read all of the stories we don't begrudge the fact that they are here.

  22. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Ayanami_R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny how when someone sees a news story that they disagree with it suddenly becomes "PR" or "An Ad."

    --
    "Science is the power of man"
  23. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ars Technica has a really great article about Amazon expanding their Dash buttons to cover Red Bull, Starbucks, Trojan condoms and your mom.

    Frankly, I'm surprised /. hasn't got that story up as well.

  24. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bloated and slow text editor.

  25. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. They can't even explain what this damn thing does.

  26. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visual Studio was pretty good at version 6, after that it went downhill.

  27. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by SirSlud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So ... the front page is the wayside?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  28. Re:As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is a Xamarin?

    www.xamarin.com

    Though the 'actors' or whatever, they show in the photo look like typical douches of what marketing-types think developers look like now.

  29. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you smoking? VS wasn't even usable until .NET.

  30. Re:Holy crap ... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

    What the hell is Xamarin?

    Hmm, that's a good question, too bad the article doesn't give any indication...

    What, what's this text on the top of the second image in the article?

    Build C# apps on Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac with Xamarin.

    Geeze, it's like no one has any reading comprehension any more...

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.
  31. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amidst all these complaints by Freshly Exhumed is the single, underlying one: Freshly Exhumed is afraid of Microsoft and hates that some developers find their offerings compelling.

  32. Look it up already! by MikeTheGreat · · Score: 1

    If you have to ask, you should first look it up, then ask an informed question

    One of the reasons why I come here is to be exposed to tech that I haven't seen before. See something that you're not familiar with? Look it up!
    Especially for this topic - "Xamarin", just by itself, is an extremely unique search term thus enabling you to self-educate with almost no effort. And today the whole Xamarin+VS is at the top of any search results for either.

    Slashdot is "news for nerds", not "news for people who kinda like plunking around on their computers in between their online first-person shooter games but don't really want to have to, y'know, think about this stuff"

    1. Re:Look it up already! by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      "news for people who kinda like plunking around digging a new room for their bunkers, tightening their tinfoil hats, and screaming at kids to get off their lawns, but don't really want to have to, y'know, think about this stuff"

      FTFY :)

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Look it up already! by flopsquad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have to ask, you should first look it up, then ask an informed question

      One of the reasons why I come here is to be exposed to tech that I haven't seen before. See something that you're not familiar with? Look it up!

      Yes, it is reasonable, in general, to expect people to Google easy-to-find information.

      Yes, it is also reasonable to expect a news summary (anywhere) to give at least a cursory explanation of abbreviations, technical terms, or made up words with which a substantial portion of the readership will be unfamiliar.

      It's just good policy in writing: don't fight human nature. People skimming a summary, even smart, technically minded people who are Google search ninjas, don't want to have to go traipsing off somewhere else to investigate why they should even be reading the summary in the first place.

      It need not take a lot of space, either. Examples:

      "Microsoft today announced that Zazzlebazzle, a tool for dynamically replacing code comments with emojis, is now available for free for every Visual Studio user."

      "Microsoft today announced that Sprug, a responsive framework for synergizing cloud competencies, is now available for free for every Visual Studio user."

      "Microsoft today announced that ^F+7d#, a popular object-disoriented programming language, is now available for free for every Visual Studio user."

      Note that this is audience-specific--if you're writing for /., you shouldn't have to say "... encryption, which is the process of encoding messages or information in such a way that only authorized parties can read it..." But this one, yeah, they could've spent 7 words to fill in the uninformed about what a Xamarin is.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    3. Re:Look it up already! by MikeTheGreat · · Score: 1

      Note that this is audience-specific--if you're writing for /., you shouldn't have to say...

      Agreed - that's exactly what I'm pushing. Here on /. we should be expected to know about technology, or have enough interest to go look it up (or be mature enough to ignore it). One of the ways that /. can differentiate itself from other websites is by attracting a more technically proficient audience, and part of that is to implicitly establish the 'floor' of knowledge expected of participants.

      Personally, I find this to be a good way to figure out what I ought to know - if something comes up and I don't know what it is I might ignore it the first time. And the second time. By the third time it's clear that I need to know more about it because clearly it's important.

      Also - I love your technology examples :)

    4. Re:Look it up already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard about Zazzlebazzle

    5. Re: Look it up already! by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Sprug is free now and they lead with Xamarin? Wth...

  33. Re:Holy crap ... by bondsbw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft has a developer conference whose announcements are more directly related to the primary purpose of this site than 90% of the other posts. It happens once a year.

    Don't worry, we will get back to your typical unrelated crap posts soon enough, and you'll be happy for the next 362 days.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  34. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

    Believe it or not, many here do work in the Microsoft "ecosystem" and so are interested in these things. Also, the non-Microsoft stories far out number the Microsoft stories.

    Dude VS 2015 is the most multiplatform version ever. No I am not paid by MS.

    After Gates and Balmer, MS has made Android SDK and emulators, ported Clang to Windows, added GIT and git hub, adding Mac OSX and Linux to VS online, added support for making Xaramin and mono apps, made CentOS and Ubuntu virtual machines for Azure, open sourced and ported Powershell to Linux, made MS code editor and ported it to Linux and MacOSX, open sourced their .NET compiler and frameworks, made VS 2015 for free aka community edition which is not crippled!

    Oh and ubuntu is going to run with bash on Windows 10 with apt-get. Oh and SQL Server is on Linux now too!

    No folks you did not misread what I wrote.

    Linux FOSS is not an OS but a religion for many on here. If you have strong blinders on how is anyone different from a creationist denying evolution?

    I am not paid or a troll but if I had to choose between Oracle and MS, I would pick MS in 2015. Something unthinkable in 2001 when I too believed in the theology of free software liberation and wanted MS to die. But, like IBM things changed with competition and I grew up too.

    MS may not have historically made the best operating systems. But, their business software is very strong. I see Visual Studio as being more open and better in recent releases

  35. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with all these Apple stories during WWDC?
    What's with all these Google stories during I/O?

  36. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad micros~1 is entirely suit-centric, not nerd-centric, and except for being the biggest bully on the block, they never really mattered, and they still don't.

    So your assertions ([citation needed]) say that slashdot has been infested with suit-wearing crud and therefore should cater to code grinders and other bottom feeders. Well, I tentatively agree with the irrelevancy, yes. Whether it should continue down that path, well, maybe not.

  37. Called it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Just want to point out that I called Xamarin going free a little while ago: Post Here.

    This is great, great news, something I've been really looking forward to. I've known people to make apps in Unity3D because it was cheaper than Xamarin, even though Xamarin is a better product.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Called it by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Does Xamarin actually offer Unity3D-scope game engine stuff? Or were people just using the Unity3D prep-level stuff for convenience?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Called it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Xamarin does not offer Unity3D-scope features for game development. I assume (but never looked into it) that it offers cross-platform 3D API calls.

      In my example, people were using Unity3D for app development (with a basic 2D GUI). (Admittedly, these were game developers who were more familiar with Unity3D. But the real issue was they already bought their Unity3D licenses, and the Xamarin licenses were more expensive.). That meant all the GUI felt the same across all the versions of app, but not like a native UI at all.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  38. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No but drinking from the annual MS BUILD conference is a press worthy IT event and yes they do PR. Get over it as it ends tomorrow anyway.

    During LinuxWorld or a Redhat conference you will see ... shock Linux and FOSS stuff.

    If the other tech sites like Neowin.net and arstechnica.com get the scope 1st subscribers will go there instead so yes.

    FYI if you really hate MS and want to hear no news of it go into your login profile and edit the stories out. VIOLA no MS or Windows news. Slashcode is customizable for the user.

  39. Re:Holy crap ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Informative

    What the hell is Xamarin

    It's a cross-platform wrapper for Mono (an open-source version of C#/F#/.Net) that compiles to iOS and Android applications. There's a big push in Xamarin to try to make the UI (a) sane for the developer regarding versions and (b) proper native UI interfaces (not HTML5) that conform to the expectations on each device type.

    It also exposes the sensors/other phone things. If you like C#/F#/etc. (although not VB.net, cause that's a bad language and only bad people like it) this is a product that used to be in the $1,000+ going free.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  40. In a line of failures.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft actually did something good for once. I'm really looking forward to experimenting with this as it used to cost a ridiculous price of thousands of dollars! This may actually open up the windows store and visual studio to more opportunities. Visual Studio is the best environment to program in, by far... JAVA is OK but lacks features and frankly has security issues. C# is by far easier to work with and this may bring it into the mobile revolution. Oh and Microsoft... Please fix the privacy issues with windows 10.... NOW!

    1. Re:In a line of failures.... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Out of honest curiosity, have you used "real" programming languages? It's been years since I looked, but it always seemed to me that C# combined the worst weaknesses of C++ and Java into an unholy amalgamation without either of their strengths.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:In a line of failures.... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Dunno what to tell you there, besides it's time to look again.

      Yes, when C# first started, it was basically just a "meh" clone of Java. But these days, I can't think of a language I'd rather use. It's gone way past Java in the last few years, Java is even starting to copy things out of C# such as automatic properties, lambda expressions, etc. (Sure both were invented with other languages, but C# was the first to bring them mainstream and make them indispensable.)

      Try it again now, it's really turned into something solid and fun to develop with.

    3. Re:In a line of failures.... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Huh. Maybe it's finally worth taking a serious look at.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:In a line of failures.... by terjeber · · Score: 1

      been years since I looked, but it always seemed to me that C# combined the worst weaknesses of C++ and Java into an unholy amalgamation

      Clearly years ago. I have developed in Java since 1998, and C# is, and has been since about 3.5, what Java once dreamed of being. Today C# and the .Net framework, is heads and shoulders above what Java aspires to be but can't due to the thing named "designed by committee".

    5. Re:In a line of failures.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I live in a primarily c# ecosystem but need to do stuff in java occasionally.

      Every single time I have to use java it's like getting thrown back in time 10 years. Seems like every time I hear of a new java feature it's a badly ported version of something in C# that I've been using in prod since 2008.

  41. Re:As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is a Xamarin?

    www.xamarin.com

    Though the 'actors' or whatever, they show in the photo look like typical douches of what marketing-types think developers look like now.

    I now know less than I did before.

  42. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 y by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

    Cross development mobile development platform. Use C# on Android/IOS.

    https://www.lynda.com/Developm...

  43. Re:Holy crap ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, we will get back to your typical unrelated crap posts soon enough, and you'll be happy for the next 362 days.

    Except for when Apple has its conference and it's all Apple news (although mostly for consumers, not devs.), and when Google has its conference...

    OMG, it's almost like a conspiracy to allocate news stories by what's going on in the world as opposed to ensuring an even ticket punch of issues/topics every day regardless of what's happening.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  44. Re:Holy crap ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Oh, bullshit. The ENTIRE SUMMARY is:

    An anonymous reader cites a report on VentureBeat:
    Microsoft today announced that Xamarin is now available for free for every Visual Studio user. This includes all editions of Visual Studio, including the free Visual Studio Community Edition, Visual Studio Professional, and Visual Studio Enterprise. Furthermore, Xamarin Studio for OS X is being made available for free as a community edition and Visual Studio Enterprise subscribers will get access to Xamarin's enterprise capabilities at no additional cost. The company also promised to open source Xamarin's SDK, including its runtime, libraries, and command line tools, as part of the .NET Foundation 'in the coming months.'
    Plenty of developers will find this announcement exciting. Xamarin being free is a big deal.

    I'm not reading TFA to find out WTF TFS is about, the entire purpose of TFS is to know what the hell TFA is about so I can decide if I fucking care.

    So, something I've never heard of is now free ... do I give a shit or not? I'm afraid if the poster refuses to tell me what the hell it is, I don't give a damn enough to RTFA.

    TFS is there to tell me what TFA is about. The problem is, it utterly fails in that basic task.

    Hey, why not just post URLs with no summary, and we'll cut out the middle man entirely?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  45. Re:Holy crap ... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

    So, something I've never heard of is now free ... do I give a shit or not?

    If you've never heard of it, and can't be bothered to click a link placed directly in fron of you, then no, you obviously don't give a shit.

    Hey, why not just post URLs with no summary, and we'll cut out the middle man entirely?

    Counter-point: if you can't be bothered to click a link, why not just repost the full article, then?

    The people who are interested in this piece of news already know what Xamarin is, seeing as it's pretty popular amongst cross-platform mobile developers, so it's no more unreasonable to not include a description than it would be to not describe what Android or iOS is. Anyone curious who doesn't already know what it is just has to click the link to find out, and if they can't be bothered to do that, then they just don't want to know.

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.
  46. Re:Holy crap ... by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  47. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was a build system. Boy, Microsoft is confused.

  48. YES! by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As much as I hate Microsoft, this is absolutely fantastic news.

    I really wanted to learn Xamarin, but their pricing started at ouchy, and then went batshit ludicrous. (Their 'free' offering was such a joke that I pretend it doesn't even exist).

    All the major cross-platform game engines have gone the 'pay us when you make some money' route, but the major application toolkits like Xamarin and QT refused to let go of their expensive subscription models. That means you couldn't just dabble and see what happens, cause if you so much as entertained the notion of putting your application up on an app store (even if it was free), you were required to pay out hefty sums on a monthly basis.

    This is a move I've been really hoping someone would make, because now I have a no-risk way to do fully cross-platform development (ie: mobile *and* desktop, not just multiple mobile platforms). WXWidgets appears to have stalled. ObjectPascal/Lazarus looks amazing, but very rough. Phonegap is slick, but it doesn't even try to target desktop.

    Meanwhile, writing in good old-fashioned C++ would still require me to learn the boilerplate code for every platform I would want to target.

    And now, for the first time ever I have a very compelling reason to learn C#.

    Well played, Microsoft. Well played.

    1. Re:YES! by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I agree. But QT, I believe includes cross-platform UI components. Does Xamarin? Or (as several have mentioned here), are they just 'working on it'?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    2. Re:YES! by terjeber · · Score: 2

      includes cross-platform UI components. Does Xamarin?

      Yes.

    3. Re:YES! by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      I agree and scouring the license looking for the gotcha. If this is legit and I can use it for FREE on Mac, I am going to have a tough time staying with Objective-C/Swift and move to C#. This could be the biggest move Microsoft ever made and it could result in apps being produced for their wretched phones. The question is what is C# and how hard is it to learn the Xamarin Framework, exploring now.

      Looking at the DEMO App TASKY, the code seems very readable, reminds me of the old Visual Basic Stuff. Going to try to write an app and test my brain plasticity.

      All I can say is WOW, Microsoft, interesting move.

    4. Re: YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is going to be huge for iOS dev, since XCode is a dire IDE. And it is going to be huge for my pocket, since I only have to write one app to cover three mobile platforms instead of three separate apps in three separate languages. I don't so much mind Java, and even Swift has its strenghts, but I can manage more in C# in half the time of either of Java or Swift, and a quarter of the time of Objective C.

      Good move MS. Thought I'd never say that...

    5. Re: YES! by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      I am with you 100% on Objective C, that language is too hard for my brain to process. I realize it is a superset of C so it had to abandon C style syntax like dot notation and parenthesis. I find Objective C almost impossible to move quickly in, I can see why they replaced it with Swift, which is much, much more readable.

    6. Re:YES! by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      ... Looking at the DEMO App TASKY, the code seems very readable, reminds me of the old Visual Basic Stuff ...

      Ewww. How can you say that? Visual Basic cannot possibly compare to C#. Horrid outdated language that it is.
      Personally I have to support still-running code written in VB6, as well as having the pleasure of writing new stuff in C#. The more C# evolves, the uglier it is to take a step back in time and read/update the VB code. (I replace the VB6 components with .Net alternatives every time I have the excuse to do so, but it still won't all go away).

      Try C#, it has so many excellent features now.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  49. Re:Holy crap ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    and you'll be happy for the next 362 days.

    361. You fail to take into account one very special day tomorrow.

  50. Re:Holy crap ... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is a basically sort of a news gathering service. It should tell us what the linked articles are about, otherwise as gstoddart said they might as well just post huge lists of URLs.

  51. Re:Holy crap ... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    Your comment is more informative than both TFS and the Wikipedia page combined.

    Thank you.

  52. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

    Okay. Lots of stuff. Now, can I really target all those platforms from a single code base, or is this all just TMI that makes me think I might be able to?

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  53. Xamarin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that, am I supposed to know already? Or is that part of the ploy, to get me to look up the stuff.

  54. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > if I had to choose between Oracle and MS, I would pick

    It's uncanny how similar that is to the false choice of "if I had to choose between Trump and Cruz, I would pick ..." in both smell and analogy.

  55. Re:We need a workers party! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say that like it's a bad thing...

  56. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meanwhile a long list of genuinely interesting stories submitted by well-meaning members fall by the wayside.

    Where? On the firehose? It's all garbage that nobody even wants to mod up. What story did you submit that you're so butthurt about nobody being interested in?

  57. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So because it's Microsoft it's "PR" but if it were Apple or Amazon or any number of other stories in the firehose it would be a genuine story? Your bias is obvious, presently there are 15 stories on the front page, 2 of them are related to Microsoft...get over it. When Apple's conferences are on there are more Apple stories, when Google's conferences are on there are more Google stories. If you don't like them don't read them, if you think you're missing out then go to slashdot.org/firehose.pl

  58. Re: As a developer on Microsoft OSs for over 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6 was lightyears better than .NET

  59. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

    Of course they are fucking skewed for the last few days. There Dev conference is on and as usual they make a ton of announcements at that conference, many of which are most definitely, news and technology that matters or affects people that work with computers.

  60. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like Oracle 11g Express Edition? It is free; however, it is limited.

  61. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by terjeber · · Score: 1

    Moron

  62. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by terjeber · · Score: 2

    Now, can I really target all those platforms from a single code base

    Yes.

  63. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

    Ars Technica has a really great article about Amazon expanding their Dash buttons to cover Red Bull, Starbucks, Trojan condoms and your mom.

    As far as I can tell with a quick scan, nobody has submitted that as a story to Slashdot. You can see the submissions (and vote for them yourself) at the Firehose, and if you feel that they have missed something then you can submit a story.

    It is not some massive conspiracy that they are only accepting Microsoft-related posts. They simply cannot reject a story that you find interesting that hasn't been submitted for consideration by anyone.

  64. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by ndogg · · Score: 1

    > ported Powershell to Linux

    What? That's news to me. There's Pash, but that's not from Microsoft, and it's very, very alpha.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  65. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    There sure is

  66. Re:More Microsoft PR Here Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but you must be seeing as you missed the quote that provided context for the question.

  67. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by godefroi · · Score: 1

    That's not really what most would consider "Powershell", though, is it?

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  68. Re: More Microsoft PR Here Today? by ndogg · · Score: 1

    That's not PowerShell for Linux. It's PowerShell for managing Linux machines from Windows machines. Not the same thing.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  69. Re:Holy crap ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Thanks! It's always nice to feel appreciated!

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!