Slashdot Mirror


Government's Fake University Trap Results in 21 Visa Fraud Arrests

An anonymous reader writes: The U.S. government set up a fake college called the University of Northern New Jersey as a trap to find and arrest 21 people on charges of visa fraud, reports Newsweek. The arrested 21 individuals were brokers, employers, and recruiters who conspired with more than 1,000 foreign nationals to fraudulently obtain student and foreign worker visas through a "pay to stay" New Jersey college, Department of Justice was quoted as saying. Those overseas students now face being deported from the United States for buying visas, in an alleged immigration scam worth up to $1m. From the report, "During conversations with undercover agents, one of the recruiters, Alvin Yeun, said 'we've been doing this for years' and told an agent not to worry. The 21 people arrested are residents are New Jersey, New York, California, Illinois and Georgia; some were also involved in committing work visa fraud."

15 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Should of also gone after loan abuse with schools by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Should of also gone after loan abuse with schools as well.

  2. Re:Buying Visas? by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What? It's US policy to encourage rich people and educated people to move here. Investing a million dollars in US provides benefits to our economy. This is a wonderful policy. There's no guarantee or even motivation of egalitarianism towards immigrants.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  3. This is why America needs President Trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    America desperately needs President Trump. He's the only candidate we've seen so far who has taken anything resembling a pro-American stance with respect to this issue. He has taken a strong stance against illegal immigration. He has taken a strong stance against unjust "free" trade with the third world. He has made it clear that he would put America and Americans first.

    It's no wonder he's seeing such strong support from the legal immigration communities. They had to ensure a very arduous process in order to get into America legally. It's extremely harmful and disrespectful to these legal immigrants when illegals are allowed into the country, and it's even worse when these illegals are then given amnesty.

    America needs President Trump more than ever. America needs President Trump's policies more than ever. America needs a defender like President Trump.

  4. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, if the Feds hadn't started giving out so MUCH money in loans, the schools wouldn't have started raising the tuition so high.

    You can't blame the schools for trying to make every buck they can. If such large loans weren't so readily available, the schools couldn't charge as much.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  5. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't blame the schools for trying to make every buck they can.

    Yes, you can. While raking in the moo-la has become the primary purpose of institutes of higher learning, it didn't use to be that way.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  6. Honeypot by Imazalil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the University was essentially a honeypot.

    They couldn't really do that with a "real" university lest the people they catch claim that they were in fact just trying to go the said real university. This way they set up a new university, sent out some brochures about how they 'love to work with our foreign friends' and let the people come to them. The fact that the university didn't exist before helps their case in that the people involved really weren't about helping people get an education.

  7. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    By American Vernacular English, that's not wrong.

    Ahh, no. It's wrong.

    It's like people who say, "For all intensive purposes" when they what they really mean is, "For all intents and purposes".

    "Vernacular" is not a synonym for "wrong".

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  8. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If schools were about education, then half the people going to college wouldn't be eligible. BUT we have to be "inclusive" to the point of ridiculousness because somewhere along the line, we became elitist snobs who view people with a degree as being "better" than people without one.

    It is a form of classism of the worst kind. On the otherhand, it is much easier to take someone with a piece of paper than it is to find someone who knows what he is doing, but without one.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  9. Re:Bernie isn't pro-Americans by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Except there is no such thing as H1B immigration. H1B visas are temporary work visas. They are not immigrating here. It doesn't let them stay unless they're working and has a company sponsor them. There's hoops the company has to perform to justify importing workers, which apparently can be abused for profit.

    AND, everyone with a (legit) H1B visa would here LEGALLY.

    Finally, that bill did a LOT of stuff to reform immigration.

  10. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Profit isn't a dirty word. People want more money, or else the CSU Professors wouldn't be going on strike next week. Nobody is immune from wanting more money (profit), quit acting like they are.

    Trump university is out of business, because it didn't offer anything of value. Sucks if you bought that line of shit, same as if you went to a regular university and got your "Gender Studies*" masters and can't find a job. Except one is applauded, and the other isn't (and still offers such a degree)

    I would MUCH prefer a system that had "Employment data" for each program they offer, and a "return on investment" timetabled based on actual salaries earned by people.

    You see, how you view "Profiteering" is all based on your own biases. "Gender Studies" at a regular university is just as much "profiteering" as Trump University was, you just don't recognize it as such.

    * "Gender Studies" is a fake degree, but represents real ones of little or no actual real world opportunities outside of government schools and grants. It represents degrees that nobody is really hiring outside of very specialized and limited areas.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  11. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by thaylin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That is not exactly what happened. People with degrees shows that they know how to learn something. It is proof, evidence. It does not mean the person without the degree wont do better, but they dont have proof that they can succeed. If you owned a business who would you hire, the kid off the street, or the kid with a degree for the position, pay and everything else being the same. If you said the kid off the street then I dont think you are being honest.

    And to be clear I did not get my degree until 34, for the field I was succeeding in since the age of 22.

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  12. Re: Should of also gone after loan abuse with scho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, if you really want to get into it, it's BS because a conservative backed government *in theory* wouldn't support government backed loans to go to school and would let the free market take care of it. And in a free market, ain't no way any bank is going to loan somebody 100K for a major in "*studies" if the student has the ability to file bankruptcy and get out of paying it back. But once it's government backed, and the person can't wipe it with bankruptcy then the schools are able to jack their prices up, up, up because the whole world is telling these kids you need to get a degree and it doesn't matter what in, just that you need one and those kids are naive enough to believe them. Remove the easy access to the money, and kids can't afford to go to school, and the schools lose demand and have to adjust their prices downward. Seriously, if you think universities need to charge as much as they do, go to a modern campus, they're architectural wonders and buildings are constantly being replaced. God forbid if a building hits 30 years old.

  13. I saw this happen in real-time by JBMcB · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the late 90's I was working my way through college. I worked full time over the summer, part-time during school, paying cash for my credit-hours. My mom went to the same school I went to, and in the intervening two decades, she noticed, maybe, three or four new buildings on campus.

    In the middle of my undergrad years, they opened up the federal loan program to anyone. It used to only be open to those pursuing six year degrees, usually doctors or lawyers. Now just about anyone could get a student loan.

    Fast forward a decade and a half. Tuition at that school has increased 100-150% over inflation. Parking alone went from $1/day to $8/day. It has bought two entire city blocks, razed them, and built a dozen or so new buildings, apartments, athletics centers, libraries, a "welcome center," and doubled the size of it's hospital.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  14. Re:Should of also gone after loan abuse with schoo by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you really want to press the point, sure, I'll concede that it's technically grammatically incorrect - but then I'll refuse to recognize you as any better in this manner, because you used a contraction. Contractions started out as vernacular as well, and we only write proper English around here, eh?

    The difference is that contractions are taught in school and are recognized as proper English, but no teacher who has a clue about the language would ever teach that "should of" is correct. None, zero, zip, nada. In fact, contractions date back to Old English (450 AD – 1150 AD). They also appear in Early Modern English (1450 AD to 1750 AD). Nowhere, however, in the history of written language does "should of" appear as proper, but if it's considered acceptable in 500 years or so then I'll reconsider my position.

    Or, maybe not. As someone else pointed out, "should of" is wrong because it's a mishearing of "should have", which is completely acceptable. Using "should of" means the person doesn't know what they're really supposed to be saying, just like saying "for all intensive purposes". It makes no sense in any literal or figurative form; instead it indicates that the person saying it doesn't really understand what's supposed to be coming out of their mouth.

    It's similar to people who say, "It's a doggy-dog world", when the term they mean to use is, "it's a dog-eat-dog world." One makes sense, the other does not. "Should of" makes no sense and I wish people would stop trying to pretend that it does.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  15. Re:Bernie isn't pro-Americans by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guess you didn't realize that an H1-B can be coverted to a green card.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!