Slashdot Mirror
Verizon To Submit Bid For Yahoo (thestack.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Sources close to the company have confirmed that Verizon will submit a first-round bid to purchase Yahoo's web business early next week, and that they may offer to take on Yahoo Japan as well. Time Inc. and Google are said to still be considering whether or not to make an offer, while AT&T, Comcast, and Microsoft have decided against entering a bid. Verizon's willingness to take on Yahoo Japan in the bid may give it a strategic advantage over other bidders. The combined value of Yahoo web and Yahoo Japan Corp. could put the value of the bid out of range for all but the largest investors, potentially putting interested private equity firms such as Bain or TPG out of the running.
They can't make it any worse than it already is... why bid for a sinking ship?
I'll never touch Yahoo! or it's affiliated web properties again. Shame that, Flickr and Tumblr have been a boon to my photography.
On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
Will the offer be more or less than 44.6 billion dollars.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
I just submitted a bid for Yahoo. I offered $4.38.
I was commenting on the Devops Is Dead article when it disappeared. Was this article so embarrassingly bad that the Slashdot editors felt embarrassed enough to pull the article?
I'm curious....what kind of head injuries do the people at Verizon have, anyway?
It's like they all got together and said, "We have a shitload of money...how can we flush it down a toilet to best effect?"
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
I can't see much benefit owning Yahoo! would be to Google. Many of Yahoo!'s features would likely be shut down such as mail and the home page. Google has mail, probably the most used web mail app on the planet and would transfer Yahoo! mail users to Gmail. Yahoo!'s home page consisting of horrible click bait links is pretty bad and there's already Google News. (Google should bring back Google Reader.) One thing I find much more useful is Yahoo!'s financial sites particularly it's portfolio management. Google's feature is cumbersome and hard to use so that would be a gain for Google. I can't see much else of use for Google. They'd get Marissa back but she might be damaged goods.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
shit + shit != gold
a priority. It's how many people can you harvest data from. Remember, Verizon is home of the Super Cookie. Now, most Yahoo users are using it because they're probably used to it (i.e. elderly) and/or they don't know how to change their default Firefox search.
It's a whole new world of spying and tying that across the phone they might already have bugged means some more Google style multi-angle fuckery. It means they can set Yahoo as the default search on their phones and get ad revenue for the spying they're already doing too. It makes sense if you assume people are stupid (most are), the market has limited choices (it does), and you make more money from B2B than from your plebian "customers" who will *pay you* to be spied on.
Marissa used to work for Google Maps. Hmmm ...
The purpose of existence is to make money.
And they have been for a long time...
Someday we will have just a few corporations, and they will be the state.
Now I'll have to get rid of my @sbcglobal.net email.
And $40B without her.
Back around 2004 i think i bought a IDT Winchip2 on Yahoo Auctions, which is an authentic legally binding auction unlike others that have legally directed their registrants outside of auction-appealing conduct. It was rumoured that Yahoo Auctions was brought a C'n'D by ebay for having composed their post-auction transaction process simillarly to their own. That got Yahoo Auctions post-poned and haulted yet remaining accessible to existing accounts. It was a leaner html cgi programming than eBay, fast as Craigslist, and it buckled while the likes of uBid and Haggle and BidNow or whatever continued in some way even after their own eBay encounters. Yahoo Auctions only proved that it lacked a soul to strive for anything. It was just a roulette wheel turn by it's own members: like when eBay was 250 employees maximum but now a behemoth slut for its own "star" members to generate resale tax revenue with server api's to accomodate those assessments by the pre-approved regulatory pimps that exceeded their jurisdictional pervue.
I will add that I could see Yahoo as recessively expressing itself as having competing services awaiting export. Geocitied should have been resourced into an encyclopedia format competitive to wikipedia rather than shutdown. But isnt that just Yahoo? Now isnt it? Ready to just shutdown or delegate prior powers like a defunct country? DHS procedures shat down so many chat protocols, why stop at nntp and gnutella? No legalbackbone whatsoever. It was a mainland china goobermint that requested detailed logs and accounting for any range of Yahoo account registrants that proxied traceably into other countries from China and that was the death of those. Not one bit of credability from Yahoo to to justify such intrusion of privacy or even simulated privacy. Yahoo became the equivalent of IBM durting World War 2 yet people continue to patronize that.
Verizon has already bought AOL, and some other web properties. Verizon is a communications company, ie, running hardware. Yahoo is more like a TV studio, a completely different industry. I don't see any synergies. This is irresponsible on the part of Verizon. They should be reinvesting in communications (Fios?). Maybe they should be regulated....
Verizon has been shrinking in recent years because they can't manage everything they own. Sold off Dominican Republic, Venezuela, and most of New England was sold off and they turn over more and more of the former Bell Atlantic / NYNEX region to FairPoint Communications. They've stalled FIOS rolled out and New England areas are exploring more municipal broadband to shake off Verizon's slow speeds since FiOS expansion is done. WHY would Verizon waste more time on content when they're soo badd at it? They even let Yahoo manage their content at http://verizon.yahoo.com/ On the other hand, Apple would be a BETTER company for Yahoo.APPLE could turn YAHOO around. Just look, Apple has a browser Safari. They can integrate more of Yahoo around Safari. Apple also owns no search engine BUT has search technology SIRI. They can revamp Yahoo! Search (which is a bit outdated), from the ground up and integrate SIRI into it. Not only that, they could make this revamped Yahoo/Apple/SIRI search as the default for Safari. This means the Yahoo ads network would also become more valuable as this would bring more value to the acquired Yahoo asset they bought. Note- Apple could probably do all this alone but Yahoo is literally a turn-key opportunity for more eyeballs. It has Yahoo News, it has Yahoo Widgets and all those staff member's therein can be put to work building widgets for Apple Watches, iPhone, and Apple TV and rebranding Yahoo-TV as Apple TV and so on. Yahoo's radio/broadcast app business can also be re-purposed for Apple iTunes /Beats content.
This ads network could be Apples, they could pick apart Yahoo Search and redevelop it brand new with SIRI integrated. They could merge the Yahoo TV business/Yahoo widgets with Apple TV, plus Yahoo has an Internet Service with Verizon, British Telecom, AT&T, and Rogers Cable that Apple could earn revenue from. And they'd have content with customers. PLUS Yahoo messenger could be rehabbed completely and made into an Apple messenger.