Slashdot Mirror


CIA Is Investing Heavily In Firms That Do Social Media Mining and Surveillance (theintercept.com)

Lee Fang, reporting for The Intercept, lists more than three-dozen companies that have received funding from CIA. In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm, the publication claims, has invested in 38 companies that research on "social media mining and surveillance." The unpublicized In-Q-Tel companies are: Aquifi, Beartooth, CliQr, CloudPassage, Databricks, Dataminr, Docker, Echodyne, Epiq Solutions, Geofeedia, goTenna, Headspin, Interset, Keyssa, Kymeta, Lookout, Mapbox, Mesosphere, Nervana, Orbital Insight, Orion Labs, Parallel Wireless, PATHAR, Pneubotics, PsiKick, Rocket Lab, Skincential Sciences, Soft Robotics, Sonatype, Spaceflight Industries, Threatstream, Timbr.io, Transient Electronics, TransVoyant, TRX Systems, Voltaiq, and Zoomdata. From the report: Bruce Lund, a senior member of In-Q-Tel's technical staff, noted in a 2012 paper that "monitoring social media" is increasingly essential for government agencies (PDF) seeking to keep track of "erupting political movements, crises, epidemics, and disasters, not to mention general global trends."CIA also recently funded Clearista, a skin care product company that collects DNA.

67 comments

  1. Investigating in??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    = Investing in???

    1. Re:Investigating in??? by Stephenmg · · Score: 1

      Both. You know they didn't give any money to any companies unless they aligned with the CIA stance on trashing the constitution. Wouldn't want someone to pull a Snowden on them.

    2. Re:Investigating in??? by NReitzel · · Score: 1

      It's part of their overall stratigery.

      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    3. Re:Investigating in??? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yet another reason NOT to be on Facebook.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Investigating in??? by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

      werd butchurer!!

    5. Re:Investigating in??? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's why I'm not too worried about this stuff. I have a FB account, so I don't look too suspicious, but I don't actually do anything with it.

      I think FB's days are numbered, though: people are starting to figure out that putting their private stuff on there where the whole world can see it is not a smart move, and after enough people get fired from their jobs because of stuff they posted there, people are going to abandon it.

    6. Re:Investigating in??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "people are starting to figure out"

      Have you MET the average facebook user?

    7. Re:Investigating in??? by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      I think FB's days are numbered, though

      Year or so ago I was sitting in a little dive bar and I happened to overhear a bit of conversation between two white-haired old geezers, not tech folks at all. One of the geezers remarked: "oh no, I don't trust Facebook at all." That's when I knew the decline of Facebook had begun.

    8. Re:Investigating in??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is like Wallmart. People bitch and moan about how terrible it is, but they don't actually stop using it.

      FB isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

  2. The lines... by messymerry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The lines between corporations and government are getting blurrier by the day. Those with an ear, let them hear...

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    1. Re:The lines... by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Coming Soon: GovCorp.com.gov . . .

    2. Re:The lines... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the new Soviet Russia. Where tech corps are the KGB.

    3. Re:The lines... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Those ears aren't listening until checks start rolling in. Money talks. You'd be better off doing a kickstarter or similar project where people pool money to get good legislation passed.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  3. Investing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean investing

  4. How is Docker social media related? by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    Just seems a weird choice to put in the article.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:How is Docker social media related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little SEO from the Intercept's editors.

    2. Re:How is Docker social media related? by rockmuelle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Docker has introduced some wonderful security holes into the cloud ecosystem. Given its heavy use in many environments (and downstream use by well meaning individual users), it provides a wonderful backdoor that intelligence agencies will have access to for years to come.

      Even without the obvious root filesystem access issue (which Docker likes to brush aside as "well, you can do that with a VM, too"), there are still thousands of Docker images out there running unpatched versions of libraries.

      -Chris

    3. Re:How is Docker social media related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seventeen contracts are linked to in the Intercept article. Docker's is one of them.

      Docker: Open platform to build, ship, and run distributed applications. Contract is here: https://www.fbo.gov/spg/TREAS/BPD/DP/SS-CFPB-16-032/listing.html

      "The Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service), on behalf of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), intends to contract with Docker Inc., 144 Townsend Street, San Francisco, CA 94107, on a sole source basis, under authority of FAR 6.302-1, for one (1) Node License including Docker Engine, Docker Trusted Registry, Docker Universal Control Plane & Business Day Support 6AM - 6PM PT, Monday - Friday, one (1) year subscription. Docker Inc. has been identified as the only source capable of providing the required content in an arrangement that suits the needs of the CFPB."

      Yep, the Intercept just called out Docker for being the sole source of Docker.

    4. Re:How is Docker social media related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO, this just makes me think of GTA V. Prepare... to... dock.

    5. Re:How is Docker social media related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter what the contract is for Docker got on its knees and is sucking the big one. A company with ANY dealings with the CIA/NSA/FBI can't be trusted. PERIOD!

  5. Re:"CIA Is Investigating Heavily" by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Poor Manish! It isn't his fault.

  6. three-dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it not "three dozen"? What is with the "-" in there?

    1. Re:three-dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, three-dozen is a compound noun, whereas one dozen isn't.

      You do understand that the CIA introduces these typos to keep intelligent
      people busy correcting them as opposed to getting involved in things like --

      http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2013/ucm363201.htm

      CAP === 'airlines'

  7. Wrong Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title says "investigating" the summary says "investing in".

    Looks like Slashdot is following the MSM's trend of half-assed literary composition. Pity.

  8. Investing != Investigating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Investing != Investigating Pretty sure the title is incorrect.

    That said, screw the CIA. They work against US citizens far more than they work for them.

    1. Re:Investing != Investigating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My reaction to the title: "Good, those places need to be examined for misdeeds."
      My reaction to the summary: "Oh, nevermind."

    2. Re:Investing != Investigating by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Investing != Investigating Pretty sure the title is incorrect.

      The CIA is investigating the books of these companies. The appropriate CIA front company will provide investment funding.

  9. Headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't the headline read "investing" instead of "investigating"?

  10. OMG "Do they speak english in what"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Investigating? or Investing?

  11. I've been saying this for years! by Archeopteryx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We get all bent out of shape when the NSA collects nearly useless phone records, and then give every secret in our lives to Facebook, Google, and Yahoo without a care!

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re: I've been saying this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked for yahoo they told us we were building video services but it was really Metadata tracking for an unconstitutional scraper , boss even mentioned "too secret military project " . I quit soon after

    2. Re: I've been saying this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked for yahoo they told us we were building video services but it was really Metadata tracking for an unconstitutional scraper , boss even mentioned "too secret military project " . I quit soon after

      Silly child, a warrant isn't needed is the information is given willingly--so it's perfectly constitutional.

    3. Re:I've been saying this for years! by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      Interesting case in point. Today the UK arrested five suspects linked to the attacks in Paris and Brussels. They did this with the direct assistance of MI5 and presumably French security services. It wouldn't surprise me if the intelligence source was located somewhere in the vicinity of GCHQ, the government "listening" service.

      I'll be honest and say I'm fine with government surveillance. What's always worried me is both political control of these organs of the state and at the same time lack of political control. It's the age-old question of who polices the police. It has to be politicians answerable for their actions to the electorate, however these things by their very nature are hidden from the electorate, so there's no accountability. Committees of government and opposition controlling the security services seems to me to be the only solution. And that, by and large, is what we have.

    4. Re:I've been saying this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get all bent out of shape when the NSA collects nearly useless phone records, and then give every secret in our lives to Facebook, Google, and Yahoo without a care!

      I don't give every secret of my life to Facebook. The fact that other people are idiots is not an argument to allow the NSA to ignore the law.

    5. Re:I've been saying this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new phone book's here! The new phone book's here!

      Page 73 - Johnson, Navin R.! I'm somebody now! Millions of people look at this book everyday! This is the kind of spontaneous publicity - your name in print - that makes people. I'm in print! Things are going to start happening to me now.

    6. Re: I've been saying this for years! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Exactly: if people are stupid enough to post their private data for the whole world to see it, the government has every right to "spy" on them by looking at it.

    7. Re:I've been saying this for years! by HeadSoft · · Score: 1

      Not everyone does this. At least in the case of the commercial companies, we have a right to say no. That's not the case with the government, which is just as bad (only slower.)

    8. Re: I've been saying this for years! by Rujiel · · Score: 1

      "Committees of government and opposition controlling the security services seems to me to be the only solution. And that, by and large, is what we have." What country do you live in? Because the FISA kangaroo courts are very far from that which you just described.

    9. Re: I've been saying this for years! by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      Oh not those. I mean the committees and people who sign the orders and keep an eye on what the security services are up to. The secret courts are an absolute disgrace and affront to natural justice.

    10. Re:I've been saying this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get all bent out of shape when the NSA collects nearly useless phone records, and then give every secret in our lives to Facebook, Google, and Yahoo without a care!

      No some people like myself do understand and don't use Farcebook, Goog, or Yewhoo. No I don't own a smart phone either.

      I do wonder about the masses and why they support companies like this stealing their personal lives. Has our society finally come to where the average IQ is less than the temperature of a glass of water at room temp?

  12. BearTooth and Gotenna are Outdoors Gadgets by rgbscan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    BearTooth and GoTenna are communications companies looking for off-grid comms. I can see why "the company" would be interested in this off the shelf solution. They both pair your Android or iOS devices via Bluetooth to their off-grid communications product.

    Beartooth forms a mesh network with other Beartooth units it can "see", operates in the 900mhz band, and offers text private and group messaging, gps sharing, and voice messaging across the mesh network it creates between it's users. It also charges your device via it's onboard battery pack.

    GoTenna is more expensive but does less. It offers point to point (meaning the person you want has to be in range of you, there is no mesh network) text communication and gps location sharing. It operates on the MURS bands. The only bonus is that it supposedly offers better battery life than BearTooth, and you can get it at consumer retailers like REI rather than ordering online.

  13. CIA: We want to assimilate these drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and make them part of the Collective. If they have new ways of spying on everyone, we must assimilate them.

    We are the government. Resistance is futile. From now on, you will service...us.

  14. Proof that editors are voice-to-text posting by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    That's an autocorrect f-up, no doubt.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Proof that editors are voice-to-text posting by msmash · · Score: 1

      It was indeed a case of autocorrect system fixing my words for me. Apologies. Disabling this terrible extension I downloaded. Thanks for pointing out, guys.

  15. Invest, or investigate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, Faildot. Did Dice buy you back?

  16. errupting political movements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like democracy

  17. CIA and social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No surprise here.
    The only questions concern how much, how many people, and length of............ retention.

  18. Right... by DivineKnight · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because they've looked into their crystal ball, and have seen that the terrorists of the future are going to blog about their next big target ("200,000 likes and we'll bomb the Statue of Liberty!").

    You know what, I'm fine with this. I just need some island to retire to, and the rest of the world can go full retard.

    1. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      200,000 likes and we'll bomb that quiet, seemingly uninhabited, island.

  19. Not broadband, then? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    ..., operates in the 900mhz band,...

    That would be 0.9 hz, right? ;-)

  20. For End Result, See Iran by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    The CIA having a business arm is a very dangerous thing.

    http://www.businessinsider.com...

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  21. Probably not the whole story by plopez · · Score: 1

    Since both the intelligence agencies and the DoD have huge black budgets who know what other companies they are investing in. How is it that companies with no profits keep getting funded?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  22. Facetwat generation, you get what you deserve by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you Facetwat addicts post every stupid cat video, check in into every restaurant you go to, and post every little thing that happens to you -- people start using you to make even *more* money than before.

    Enjoy your oversharing. It'll bite you in the ass someday. Maybe now, maybe soon, maybe a long time for now.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Facetwat generation, you get what you deserve by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      ..."FROM now..." not ..."for now." Oy. I blame acute caffeine deficiency and not hitting Preview.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:Facetwat generation, you get what you deserve by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the really young people (18-25) are abandoning Facebook in droves (or just not using it, and basically maintaining an account there so they can talk to their parents). It's the Gen-Xers and Millenials who are stupidly posting every detail of their lives to Facebook.

  23. Bring back Air America by swb · · Score: 1

    I don't care where they fly as long as the legroom is good.

  24. rub the nub of slashdot paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People tend to forget that the CIA is divided into two division (technically its four, but by function its is really two), Operations and Analysis. Operations is the division that does all the black bag stuff, while the Analysis division geared to intelligence gathering and, well, analysis. Investing in social media intelligence (oxymoron?) gathering companies falls within the purview of a government agency whose purpose is to analyze "erupting political movements, crises, epidemics, and disasters, not to mention general global trends.." as mentioned in the TFS and report such analysis to their clients in the administration and Congress. Not everything about intelligence agencies is nefarious.

  25. Title, as usual, is way off. by wiredog · · Score: 2

    So is the summary. Only 4 of the 38 are social media analysis firms. Docker, for example, is a software container (sort of virtual machine) company.

  26. Ouch, that hertz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, a little anyways.

  27. The U.S government is CORRUPT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "CIA ... trashing the constitution"

    Secret U.S. government agencies do whatever they want. There is very little oversight. Those who want to kill people have no need to take a chance on getting arrested for murder. They join one of the many secret or semi-secret agencies.

    Those who want to play video games that kill real people could work for the U.S. government in 19 countries. Now only 18 countries since the Uzbek government evicted the CIA killing organization.

    Those in the U.S. who want to mistreat other people don't need to risk going to prison.

    Those who want easy money that can be wasted in crazy schemes have no need to face bankruptcy. They can join a secret agency and use taxpayer money for things like a $43 million compressed natural gas station that serves only about 100 taxi drivers.

    Those who want to find investment opportunities can join the many secret U.S. government agencies like No Sense in America, NSA, and listen to phone calls. Think the NSA is one organization? No, the NSA has contracting companies: How Private Contractors Have Created a Shadow NSA.

    There is little democracy in the U.S. The U.S. government helps the rich get richer.

  28. Right back at ya by Halo1 · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is that you can do exactly the same (it's the first talk in that video) to datamine the CIA, FBI, ... and their subcontractors. The resulting project names you find range from scary-but-expected ("Panopticon") to downright disturbing ("Never shake a baby").

    --
    Donate free food here
  29. The CIA's target: the public at large by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Taxpayer dollars thrown at the investigation and subduement of movements and protest.

  30. Corporatism by rsborg · · Score: 1

    The lines between corporations and government are getting blurrier by the day. Those with an ear, let them hear...

    “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power”
      Benito Mussolini

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  31. sonatype??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to be clear -- the CIA is investing in sonatype -- the people who write the software that runs maven.org and builds or hosts the authority for virtually all java software project's in the entire world?

    Did I read this correctly?

  32. cunts will be cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The unpublicized In-Q-Tel companies are: Aquafina , Beartooth, CliQr, CloudPassage, Databricks, Dataminr, Docker, Echodyne, Epiq Solutions, Geofeedia, goTenna, Headspin, Interset, Keyssa, Kymeta, Lookout, Mapbox, Mesosphere, Nervana, Orbital Insight, Orion Labs, Parallel Wireless, PATHAR, Pneubotics, PsiKick, Rocket Lab, Skincential Sciences, Soft Robotics, Sonatype, Spaceflight Industries, Threatstream, Timbr.io, Transient Electronics, TransVoyant, TRX Systems, Voltaiq, and Zoomdata.

    HTH