Slashdot Mirror


Prescription Meds Get Trapped In Disturbing Pee-To-Food-To-Pee Loop (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A study published Tuesday in Environmental Science and Technology is the first to validate the long-held suspicion that pharmaceuticals may get trapped in infinite pee-to-food-to-pee loops, exposing consumers to drug doses with unknown health effects. In a randomized, single-blind pilot study, researchers found that anti-convulsive epilepsy drug carbamazepine, which is released in urine, can accumulate in crops irrigated with recycled water -- treated sewage -- and end up in the urine of produce-eaters not on the drugs. While the amounts of the drug in produce-eater's pee were four orders of magnitude lower than what is seen in the pee of patients purposefully taking the drugs, researchers speculate that the trace amounts could still have health effects in some people, such as those with a genetic sensitivity to the drugs, pregnant women, children, and those who eat a lot of produce, such as vegetarians. And with the growing practice of reclaiming wastewater for crop irrigation -- particularly in places that face water shortages such as California, Israel, and Spain --- the produce contamination could become more common and more potent, the authors argue.

134 comments

  1. So distill wastewater then? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    NT

    1. Re:So distill wastewater then? by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      You want to distill it anyhow, just for the sake of extracting fertilizer.

    2. Re:So distill wastewater then? by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 2

      Sure why not, most of the areas that are short on water have a lot of solar thermal energy available to drive such a distillation system and as a side effect you get to generate lots of kinetic energy in steam turbines, to drive electricity generators.

    3. Re:So distill wastewater then? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      It's probably better to use some kind of decreased-pressure multi-stage system. i suspect the volumes and energies involved don't work well for some kind of open-loop thermal plant like what you suggest. Not to mention the fact that you don't need high-grade heat for this.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:So distill wastewater then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Distillation is prohibitively expensive and impractical at the necessary quantities, given current technology.

    5. Re:So distill wastewater then? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I know it is Slashdot, and RTFA is too much to ask - but how about the summary? This is not about drinking water.

      But even if it were, the distribution system would need to be completely changed to separate drinking water from other uses. It'd probably be more practical to filter it at the home than to run a second set of pipes everywhere and update all household and commercial plumbing.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:So distill wastewater then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't that defeat the point? Your pee drugs will just end up in the fertilizer.

  2. I was framed! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    I swear officer Oby, your piss test is flawed. I don't do drugs.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:I was framed! by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      My test is not flawed chronic . Youâ(TM)ve been snorting paracetamol.

  3. Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > those who eat a lot of produce, such as vegetarians.

    Good thing I'm not a vegetarian then.

    1. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by guises · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bleh. Wish the original paper wasn't paywalled, this vegetarian business doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If you take that produce and feed it to animals, and then eat the animals, you should have at least as much exposure as from eating the produce straight. If the drug in question is one which bioaccumulates, then your exposure should be higher than it would be from eating the produce straight. It would be nice to see what the paper said specifically, rather than getting it second hand.

    2. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      Because your pee ingestion is a more deliberate act?

    3. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the drug in question is one which bioaccumulates...

      And that's the big question, isn't it? I hope somebody's looking into it, because without knowing how much it accumulates in the animal's bodies we can't judge how much of a concern it is. And, even if it isn't, the animal's waste products are probably being used as fertilizer, sending it right back into whatever crops it's used on. I'm not an alarmist, but we clearly need to know more about this.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And that's the big question, isn't it?

      Given that is accumulates in humans, and discharges into water, which bio accumulate it, one would presume it's prone to bio accumulation.

    5. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take that produce and feed it to animals, and then eat the animals, you should have at least as much exposure as from eating the produce straight

      Not always the case. For example, ff you eat hay, you can't break down the cellulose in it because you don't have the necessary enzyme. Your body uses the cellulose kinda like a fibre to help with bowel movements. However, when a cow eats hay it contains a bacteria in its gut that can break it down and digest it. So by eating the cow you wouldn't get any benefit from cellulose.

    6. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably should have used celery as an example instead of hay since humans don't normally eat hay but you get my point.

    7. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the drug in question is one which bioaccumulates

      Then the original patient wouldn't be whizzing so much of it out.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      The fact that it bioaccumulates in humans suggests that it might in food animals as well, but doesn't prove it. And, the fact that it gets excreted by humans suggests (but doesn't prove) that it doesn't. Again, we don't know enough to judge how dangerous it is, but caution is certainly indicated, especially when you consider that young children may well be much more sensitive to this than adults.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and discharges into water

      Which is a strong indication it does not bioaccumulate in humans. Another is that they use this chemical as a drug. A drug which bioaccumulates would quickly become a poison (eg, using mercury to treat syphilis) and would for one shot attempts at fixing illnesses not a long term medication for treating epileptic conditions.

      Now the human body is relatively good at dealing with toxins, so it may be that cows and whatnot might bioaccumulate this while humans do not. But I doubt that's happening.

    10. Re: Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But what if you ate a vegetarian?

      Clearly the solution is to move to the top of the food chain and prey entirely on those who feed on sentient beings.

      It's the only way to be sure.

    11. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by jandersen · · Score: 1

      those who eat a lot of produce, such as vegetarians.

      Good thing I'm not a vegetarian then.

      Except that meat-eaters tend to eat animals that are, so they get it pre-concentrated, as it were.

    12. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried about the antibiotic resistant bacteria in the meat you eat. Farmers often give animals low doses of antibiotics to fatten them up, but there is evidence that this causes the bacteria living in them to become resistant and cause human health problems when consumed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, you wouldn't. The thing you are overlooking is that these drugs get into the water supply because humans pee them out. With vanishingly rare exceptions, chemicals which are in human urine do not bio-accumulate. The simple explanation of this is that chemicals which bio-accumulate do not cross the membrane filters used by the kidneys to filter blood and thus stay in the blood.
      So, since these drugs do NOT build up in the human body to any significant extent, they will, also, not build up in the bodies of animals.Basically, plants will likely contain ALL of the drugs which they took up from the water for their entire life cycle (from germination to harvest) while animals will only have the drugs which were contained in their last meal or three.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    14. Re: Vegetarians at risk. by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      I thought nuking them for orbit was the only way to be sure.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    15. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't bio-accumulate, because that is the exact opposite of peeing it out.

      But we do have environment-accumulate, where due to having to eat constantly these drugs due to our normal food intake we will have a constant level of these drugs in our system. The people explicitly taking drugs will increase the amount of drugs in the environment, while the people implicitly taking drugs will keep the amount of drugs in the environment constant.

    16. Re: Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be a stupid question, but If the only thing making a cow digest hay is a bacteria, can that bacteria be transplanted into humans so we can digest hay? There has been stories lately of humans donating gut bacteria to each other.

    17. Re: Vegetarians at risk. by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      The bacteria aren't the ONLY thing. They need a specialized stomach in which they can do their work (combined with the ability to regurgitate the stuff so you can chew it again into smaller bits).

      I'm OK sticking to celery.

    18. Re: Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microwaved food is so bland and tasteless.

    19. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cough http://ge.tt/9uOXOuZ2

    20. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      It isn't just to fatten them up although it does help, close to 100lbs extra hanging weight according to the farmer I get mine from. When the cattle are walking around knee deep in their own filth pumping them full of antibiotics is necessary to keep them alive. This is one of the reasons I am glad I know where the meat I eat comes from and the actual conditions it lives in. Also I know how the processor operates and it is substantially cleaner and more careful than the big ones. It doesn't hurt that they have a wall of quality awards, state wide and national ones, and get a few new ones each year.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    21. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you mean it as a joke but consider that animal feed is even less regulated than for-human food crops. The same steps won't be used to ensure decontamination of water used for such animal feed. I can only imagine the kinds of chemicals you'll find there and, thus, in your Big Mac.

      Have a good day!

    22. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't judge me!

    23. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy? Do they ship?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    24. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Big Macs contain any actual meat, I thought I heard that McDonalds uses Soy burgers.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    25. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy?

      Doesn't matter.

      Do they ship?

      Not enough to supply you without dropping quality. At least, not in the next few years.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    26. Re:Vegetarians at risk. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy?

      From a family friend who raises cattle and has been using the processor for years. I take my deer to that processor as well as unlike so many other ones you actually get your deer back. Also while I could butcher a deer one would find out the true meaning of hatched job if I did and it seems like such a waste when for a nominal cost one can get the best cuts done right. The processor is Grand Champion Meats in Foley, MN. Also with this setup I pay the farmer for the beef directly and pay the processor for the processing, last year it came out to $4.27/lb and that includes everything from lowly ground beef to filet mignon.

      Do they ship?

      The processor ships some stuff, but the farmer maintains a small herd of 12-14 head on 35 acres so you would have to find your own farmer. You likely could find a smaller really good processor in your area and if you ask around they may direct you to a local farmer that they regularly work with.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  4. Important to Note by Zeroblitzt · · Score: 1

    I think it's also important to note that this means you are inadvertently eating someone else's pee.

    --
    Mr. America walk on by your schools that do not teach Mr. America walk on by the minds that won't be reached
    1. Re:Important to Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, you're breathing air that's been in and out of the lungs and digestive tracts of people and animals for millions of years, too. It's a closed system.

    2. Re:Important to Note by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      After passing through so many kidneys it must be pure.

    3. Re:Important to Note by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      3 Terry Pratchett, RIP...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Important to Note by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Just think about all of the ass gas you inhale every day.

    5. Re:Important to Note by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Just think about all of the ass gas you inhale every day.

      Gee, thanks....

      --
      Because clearly your plan for running the government is the right plan, and everybody else is wrong.

      Of course my plan is the right one, anyone who thinks differently doesn't understand basic economics, capitalism, or socialism ;)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Drugs in the money, drugs in the water... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Drugs everywhere but in my stash box *sigh*

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Drugs in the money, drugs in the water... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2nd and 5th comments, impressive.

  6. Peak Pharma by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Can we get to peak pharma yet?
    I'm willing to let a bunch of people suffer and die for it, including myself whenever whatever befalls me.

    1. Re:Peak Pharma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to let sexconker suffer and die for it, but not myself whenever whatever befalls him.

  7. Four Orders of Magnitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Four orders of magnitude in "dosage" is likely to drop well below the level where it can have any measurable effect.

    That's the same as a liter of water vs 0.1 milliliter (2 "standard" drops of water). Anything that is potentially dangerous in sub-milliliter volumes is unlikely to be prescribed in liter volumes for others.
     

    1. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0
      Estrogen from birth control pills and hormone replacement therapy have already caused disruptions in the endocrine systems of fish in lakes. Transsexual fishies.

      Remember that the next time you're in a restaurant and they say "Try the fish."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      ambisexual fishies, not all that uncommon, even before the drugs.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Transsexual fishies.

      Which toilet am I supposed to flush my dead transsexual goldfish down? Life is getting too complicated!

    4. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, which is why low levels of human hormones can trigger sex-change in fish.

    5. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Ask it which one it identifies as.

      Obviously, this won't work after it's dead.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Transsexual fish are just as normal and valid as non-transsexual fish. You act like transexualism is a disease.

    7. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Transsexual fish are just as normal and valid as non-transsexual fish. You act like transexualism is a disease.

      That's funny - I don't FEEL diseased. :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm only familiar with your story through random, half-remembered troll messages that have cropped up in various stories over the years, but is that actually true?

      Didn't you feel something was wrong with you originally and take steps to correct it? Wouldn't that qualify as some sort of disease, or at least an undesired medical condition?

      No offense intended, if I've somehow given any.

    9. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I was being facetious, plus the fact that the depression that's hung over me has once again abated, so I don't FEEL diseased. But I still have PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder so sure, I am definitely among the walking wounded of the mentally ill.

      Of course, on the whole transsexual thing, I can't ever see myself de-transitioning. THAT would be mental. :-) Especially since it's impossible to restore everything even with the best of doctors. (no, I don't want a transplant. You could say I don't have the balls for it :-)

      And yes, I've also still diseased retinas, and that's never going to change until I go completely blind and they remove the eyeballs (diseased retinas have a tendency to tear) since the individual is pretty much blind, and often can't tell, which adds complications and mandates the removal of the eye. The 10-year-old who was operated on just before me had to have his removed, and the other one will have to go at some point as well. I had a fairly long talk with her about service dogs and how they can help keep him from being further isolated - poor kid misses a lot of school, and he's mentally handicapped.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:Four Orders of Magnitude? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Its Homeopathy all the way down!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. Only 10,000 times lower? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised the concentrations are high enough to only be 4 orders of magnitude off from a person actively taking the medication. I would have expected it to dilute a lot more than that over the course of irrigating a field of crops, picked, processed, cooked, and finally ingested.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im surprised the person taking the drugs doesnt just drink his piss after to save money on meds.

    2. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The water probably evaporates while the formerly diluted substances stay present. Also, people consume lots of food, so if one kilogram of food contains a chemical amount ten thousand times smaller than a single one gram pill, it's actually a ten million times lower concentration. You just eat a lot of it.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      10,000 times lower? That's only a 2C homeopathic succussion. No wonder it doesn't really do anything to people.

    4. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised the concentrations are high enough to only be 4 orders of magnitude off from a person actively taking the medication. I would have expected it to dilute a lot more than that over the course of irrigating a field of crops, picked, processed, cooked, and finally ingested.

      In fact if this study is accurate, then homeopathy must work.

    5. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    6. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      That is because what goes out of the system as pee are metabolites of the original drug which don't have the same effect if re ingested

    7. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the concentrations are high enough to only be 4 orders of magnitude off from a person actively taking the medication. I would have expected it to dilute a lot more than that over the course of irrigating a field of crops, picked, processed, cooked, and finally ingested.

      The numbers are verging on homeopathy.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    8. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by dangle · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, but many times the drug is excreted unchanged (during the early penicillin era, drug scarcity drove urine collection from treated patients to recycle the still-active penicillin molecules). Many times, the metabolites are also biologically active, either as part of the intended physiological effect, or active in other related or unrelated ways.

    9. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Something seems off about this whole story. Blackwater is stuff that comes from your toilet. It is treated until it's solid waste. Greywater is stuff from other sources (sinks, bathtubs, showers, storm drains). It's treated, but not to the extent of blackwater.

      Due to the risk of human pathogens in blackwater, only treated graywater is allowed to be used for irrigation. TFA says their study was conducted in Israel. Maybe they use treated blackwater for irrigation there since it's basically a desert? Or maybe the sludge from treated blackwater is being converted into fertilizer? Or maybe people pee in the shower there?

    10. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plumbing from the sink, toilet, and shower all come together into the same outflow pipes...

    11. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      As the AC mentions, in houses, there is a single sewage outflow pipe. The only place I have ever seen a seperate grey and black water setup is in RVs/camper trailers, but even then it is only to make it easier to plumb the sinks, the grey water is emptied through the same output as the blackwater, just last as it is used to flush the other tanks and the emptying pipes.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:Only 10,000 times lower? by bvdbos · · Score: 1

      Depends on your house. Why would one do that nowadays, the water from shower and sink can be re-used for you toilet...

  9. Water Filters? by nowsharing · · Score: 2

    Do home water filters like Brita help with this kind of problem?

    1. Re:Water Filters? by nsuccorso · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suppose, if you can somehow shove your fruits and vegetables through them...

    2. Re:Water Filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, 'cause it's not coming in from the faucet, it's in the produce.

    3. Re:Water Filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R.O. filters will remove 90% of "everything" but as noted plants already contain the bonus material.

    4. Re: Water Filters? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I think they were referring to the industrial-sized Brita filters that farmers use to irrigate with. ;)

    5. Re:Water Filters? by PatientZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you're supposed to pee into one if you take medications.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    6. Re:Water Filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lolno.

      Ignoring the fact that the article isn't about tap water; the stuff that IS in tap water isn't caught by customer-grade products like Brita water filters.

      The Las Vegas area, due to the extreme amount of water recycling done, has had this problem for years (decades?) now. People simply flush drugs (prescription, over the counter, illicit) down the drain, the water gets recycled, the drugs aren't filtered out and it all goes back into the system to be reused as clean water.

    7. Re:Water Filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Filters are not meant to filter out this. It's also an issue with hormone pills (birth control pills) and thought to be the issue with early puberty in children. Women on birth control flush the toilet, the water gets treated in the cities, but the hormones are not filtered out. It comes back and people drink it. Infinite loop.

      All the drink tap water, not bottled water people are looking pretty stupid right now.

    8. Re:Water Filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, you're supposed to pee into one if you take medications.

      Although she insisted it, the last time I tried that she didn't actually like it.

    9. Re:Water Filters? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      That does explain much of what I have seen in the Las Vegas area...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:Water Filters? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      All the drink tap water, not bottled water people are looking pretty stupid right now.

      Considering that bottled water is just tap water, you are looking pretty stupid right now. Read the label on your bottled water, it will tell you where it was bottled from the tap water.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  10. 10,000 time reduction each time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No they don't get trapped in a loop.

    If I eat one of these prescription-laced carrots or whatever, I've got 1/10,000 (4 order of magnitude) less than the person who made that pee carrot. I will then contribute 1/10,000 of that, and someone will eat my pee and contribute 1/10,000 of THAT. By the third person, there is 1/1,000,000,000,000 and we're talking about homeopathic levels.

    That's hardly 'trapped in a loop.'

    1. Re: 10,000 time reduction each time by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      That's hardly 'trapped in a loop.

      Maybe not but it sounds kinky.

    2. Re: 10,000 time reduction each time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but that person that contributed to the pee carrot continues to make more pee carrots and may also consume future pee carrots thereby contributing an additional 1/10,000 from the pee carrot consumed. 1/10,000 of the pee carrot you consumed is also contributed to the next pee carrot. As long as pee carrots keep being made and consumed, it will continue to accumulate.

    3. Re:10,000 time reduction each time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and we're talking about homeopathic levels. That's good, right?

    4. Re:10,000 time reduction each time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The assumption is that the next carrot will also be a pee carrot, because nothing has changed in terms of the original person taking the drugs. Therefore, 1/10,000 + 1/1,000,000 + 1/1,000,000,000,000 and so on. That's a loop.

  11. Critical Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The critical words are "single blind test" and Speculate

    Basically - researchers went looking for something and strangely found it

    I wonder what will happen when they look for poisons (arsenic, cyanide etc) or dead insects.

    Just a bull shit story went to get media coverage
    even then the summary doesn't make sense. one person on a drug. One person has a drug at concentrate x in their urine.
    This is mixed with all the other peoples waste water from showers, washing etc - then added to a crop, harvested, eaten and then the eaters urine is tested and found to be x/10,000 concentrate.
    Even if they chose a food stuff that concentrated the drug, that sounds like bollocks

    The only way I can see of getting that level of concentrate is if drug taker was pissing on the plant and then it was eaten without being washed properly (or at all)

    Just sensationalist bollocks designed to get publicity - the Donald Trump of science!

    1. Re:Critical Words by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      It might explain this

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
      Abstract

      CONTEXT:
      Age-specific estimates of mean testosterone (T) concentrations appear to vary by year of observation and by birth cohort, and estimates of longitudinal declines in T typically outstrip cross-sectional decreases. These observations motivate a hypothesis of a population-level decrease in T over calendar time, independent of chronological aging.

      RESULTS:
      We observe a substantial age-independent decline in T that does not appear to be attributable to observed changes in explanatory factors, including health and lifestyle characteristics such as smoking and obesity. The estimated population-level declines are greater in magnitude than the cross-sectional declines in T typically associated with age.

      CONCLUSIONS:
      These results indicate that recent years have seen a substantial, and as yet unrecognized, age-independent population-level decrease in T in American men, potentially attributable to birth cohort differences or to health or environmental effects not captured in observed data.

  12. Biological affinity by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    That compound seems to have low biological affinity: if it could be absorbed and expelled intact by both humans and crops, how could it have any biological effect?

    1. Re:Biological affinity by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Biological effect does not require a chemical to break down in the process. Most drugs are eliminated after being broken down, but their effect comes from interacting with the systems while they are whole. Or sometimes, the metabolic products are what interact with the system.

      But if you want a perfect example of something that doesn't break down but has a serious effect: lead. Your body doesn't convert lead to anything but lead. Wouldn't it be great if our bodies had nuclear reactors that could split lead into something else?

      But anyway, what's the problem with this carb-whatever? Isn't it good that everyone will be less likely to have seizures?

    2. Re:Biological affinity by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      But if you want a perfect example of something that doesn't break down but has a serious effect: lead.

      Yes, I have heavy metals in mind when writing my comment. The problem with lead is that it is not expelled from the body.

    3. Re:Biological affinity by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The problem with lead is that it is not expelled from the body.

      But the fact that it is not expelled is not why it is a poison.

      I answered your original question: " if it could be absorbed and expelled intact by both humans and crops, how could it have any biological effect?" Lots of drugs are expelled intact and have biological effect because being metabolized is not how they impact the system. Many are metabolized by the liver while the original drug moderates a system in the brain or other organs. Many are simply filtered out by the kidneys intact.

      If you want another metallic example, try potassium. Or sodium. Too much of either will kill you; both are regularly expelled intact.

    4. Re:Biological affinity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the fact that it isn't expelled is exactly why it's a poison. As the saying goes, enough of anything will kill you. And lead, you could probably swallow a hunk of lead and not absorb enough of it to be toxic with that one go. But since it builds up, the levels increase and even though in one sitting you never absorbed enough to kill you, over time the build up will kill you, after causing all sorts of fun problems first.

      And the reason I say even consuming large amounts won't absorb enough to kill you is because the Romans used to use it as an artificial sweetener, so clearly you can consume it and not have problems until it builds up to adequate levels.

    5. Re:Biological affinity by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      It may be that you have to supersaturate a person's whole body to get an active dose into whatever organ system the drug operates in. Pharmacokinetics can get pretty complicated.

    6. Re:Biological affinity by buck-yar · · Score: 2

      You absorb lead through your skin, so touching it is pretty bad as well. Can't imagine eating it.

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
      Abstract

      A 45-y-o male with a history of schizophrenia was admitted to a local VA psychiatric unit. Five days later, endoscopy due to abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding and blood hemoglobin of 5.6 g/dL revealed bullets in the stomach. On subsequent radiograph, > 50 bullets were visualized in the stomach and intestines. Poison Center recommendations included whole bowel irrigation and a blood lead level. After poor results with gastrointestinal decontamination and a repeat radiograph showing > 100 cartridges, surgical intervention was considered but not performed due to perceived risk of bullet detonation from electrocautery. The blood lead was reported as 391 mcg/dL. Calcium EDTA therapy was initiated, followed by aggressive gastrointestinal decontamination. Four days of whole bowel irrigation facilitated passage of 206 cartridges over the next 10 days. The patient was discharged on a 14-day course of 600 mg Succimer tid to treat the bone lead deposits and blood lead level of 49 mcg/dl. An outpatient visit 6 w later showed the blood lead level had dropped to 24 mcg/dl. Aggressive gastrointestinal decontamination and calcium EDTA and Succimer administration successfully treated an ingestion lead bullets and the resulting lead poisoning.

      or this one... sad...
      http://archpedi.jamanetwork.co...

  13. RO will clear up your water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you are concerned with say lead or pharmaceuticals, Reverse Osmosis will get it out. The process uses 5 parts untreated water to give you 1 part purified so it is wasteful. It runs off the pressure supplied by your water line so there's that. I got a setup for about 100 bucks online. It works ok. More expensive units probably do better. My total dissolved solids meter shows tap water at 350ppm here and the RO water at about 20 ppm. get one with a tank if you go cheap, it delivers a tiny trickle of purified so if you want to fill a glass you would be waiting like 5 minutes without a tank.

    1. Re:RO will clear up your water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay attention. This is about using treated sewage to water plants and the plants accumulating the drugs.

      Read skills are seriously lacking around here.

  14. ..those who eat a lot of produce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .., such as vegetarians

    sucks to be you, then, i guess.

    - a meat eater

  15. So It's Even MORE Important to Eat Your Veggies by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Now we can shut down those evil Pharma companies since everything is pre-medicated!!!

  16. Roundup by SETY · · Score: 1

    All the effort spent on glyphosate..... Versus actual drugs that work in humans. I wonder if this is the tip of the iceberg?

  17. Going vegan by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can someone tell me which veggies will contain the most oxycontin? Asking for a friend.

    Please God, don't let it be brussels sprouts. They give me wicked gas.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oxytocin is a 9 residue peptide. It is destroyed by GI proteins, precluding any possibility of systemic absorption when administered via the oral route.

    2. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a conspiracy. They don't make any of the good drugs easy to recycle in order to keep prices high.

    3. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're joking, but as a serious answer, vegetarians don't actually eat that much more produce than the rest of us. Meat is usually only a small part of a meal, e.g. 100 g. Comparing it to the rest of an example meal: 100 g rice (becomes 300 g when boiled), 250 g vegetables, 100 g for two eggs, 200 g yoghurt desert. That's almost 1 kg in total, of which the meat is almost 11% in weight.

    4. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonjour. Yes, completely broken down orally, that's why it can't be taken as a pill. It isa short amino acid chain.

      I mean, wait, not it isn't -- it will be absorbed orally from pills. That is why it is prescribed as pills. It is a small molecule opioid. Stop being a dumbass on the internet.

      http://www.rxlist.com/script/main/mobileart-rx.asp?drug=oxycontin&monotype=rx-desc&monopage=1

      You must be thinking of something else.

    5. Re:Going vegan by xSander · · Score: 1

      Dr. House, is that you?

    6. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meat is usually only a small part of a meal, e.g. 100 g.

      The metric measurement is not the only way I know you're not American.

    7. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meat is usually only a small part of a meal, e.g. 100 g.

      The metric measurement is not the only way I can tell you're not American.

    8. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which veggies will contain the most oxycontin?

      Oxytocin is a 9 residue peptide.

      You must be thinking of something else.

      Yes. Oxytocin is a nine residue peptide hormone sometimes dubbed "the love hormone".

      Oxycontin is the brand name for a small molecule opioid pain reliever and drug of abuse.

    9. Re:Going vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice oxytocin / oxycontin (oxycodone) swap. ;)

  18. Sand Filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some lake water sources in Europe with sand based soil around them have been detected forming a bacterial films or a net at the bottom which conveniently filters most medical waste products away from the water supply. Perhaps bioengineered bacterial filters could be used to manage the pollution.

  19. Good news / Bad news by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    The good news: We just made all your prescription drugs affordable.
    The bad news...

    1. Re:Good news / Bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...you need to eat your veggies.

  20. Chemophobes by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    The fact that estrogen can be a problem for fish" does not lead to the conclusion that this chemical is a problem, nor does the the fact it is a low dose does mean it is harmless. Sure it "might" cause problems in fish/humans but where is the evidence that it does?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Chemophobes by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Serch slashdot. I already posted a story about fish being affected by estrogens in lakes. Or you can just search google.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  21. Gender Benders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This along with Bisphenol-A in the lining of every can of soda and water bottle may explain a thing or two.

  22. And to think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what on Earth are birth control pills doing to us in our environment?

  23. Test on primates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets study the effect by having a Monkey drink the pee of a schizophrenic on Aripiprazole. Stream it live! Pun intended.

  24. Decomposition? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    So, once consumed, metabolized, excreted, grown in plants, and re-consumed, the drug molecules don't break down?

    1. Re:Decomposition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ars article states that the researchers were testing for the drug itself as well as its "metabolites". IANAOC (Organic Chemist) but the results would imply that some portion of the drug passes through the system without being metabolized and the portion that is metabolized breaks down into identifiable chemicals.

  25. P2P by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    I thought P2P meant something else.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  26. No shit, Sherlock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else can we explain the explosion of LGBT in America vs hardly any LGBT anywhere else in the world?

  27. "P2P" Drug Sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh the humanity. Perhaps they can integrate it into FoodTorrent.

  28. Re: So distill APPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Approximately 4000, unless you nigated some factors. Then that number would change.

  29. Are the drugs necessary!? NECESSARY!? by JesseEnjaian · · Score: 1

    Probably not, but it's sterile, and I like the taste. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  30. Homeopathy by Trogre · · Score: 1

    This is homeopathy in action, guys.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  31. Unknown Water Treatment Method by cmholm · · Score: 1

    Abstract: the water may have just been treated for bacteria, and that hasn't cut it for urban effluent for at least a decade.

    I've read the paper, and I was disappointed to find that the researchers didn't provide any context regarding the type(s) of treatment used on the wastewater before it was dumped into the irrigation systems.

    I followed up with one of the footnotes: Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture - FAO irrigation and drainage paper 47, where I find in section 2.3 that for water to be recycled for crops that were likely to be eaten uncooked, the FAO is just talking in terms of stabilization ponds for killing off the microorganisms. That's not enough. It also needs to be filtered, as if they were dealing with brackish or seawater.

    I'd been to a couple of American Water Works Association conferences in the aughts, so I know the treatment industry has been aware of and has the techniques for clearing what goes into our toilets out of the waste water at manageable costs. As of the 2007 conference, the main concern was to avoid loading up the critters downstream from the waste water plants with caffeine, birth control hormones, pain relievers, and recreational drugs.

    But, given the anticipated growth in water reuse for both irrigation and drinking, water system managers were already anticipating the need to do better. In this case, the Israelis obviously need to do better.

    Full disclosure: I served on a water supply board for 5 years.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  32. Re: So distill APPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nigated! Haha!