Slashdot Mirror


Why Movie Trailers Now Begin With Five-Second Ads For Themselves (theverge.com)

Chris Plante, reporting for The Verge: Jason Bourne takes off his jacket, punches a man unconscious, looks forlornly off camera, and then a title card appears. The ad -- five seconds of action -- is a teaser for the full Jason Bourne trailer (video), which immediately follows the teaser. In fact, the micro-teaser and trailer are actually part of the same video, the former being an intro for the latter. The trend is the latest example of metahype, a marketing technique in which brands promote their advertisements as if they're cultural events unto themselves. [...] Last year, the studio advertised the teaser for Ant-Man with a ten-second cut of the footage reduced to an imperceptive scale. [...] But where previous metahype promoted key dates in a marketing campaign -- like official trailer releases and fan celebrations -- the burgeoning trend of teasers within trailers exist purely to retain the viewer's attention in that exact moment. The teaser within the trailer speaks to a moment in which we have so many distractions and choices that marketers must sell us on giving a trailer three minutes of our time. This practice isn't limited to movie trailers, though. Next time you're on Facebook, pay attention to how the popular videos in your newsfeed are edited. Is the most interesting image the first thing you see? And does that trick get you to stop scrolling and watch?

97 comments

  1. Attention spans that can only be measure in nano- by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

    sec.....SQUIRREL!!

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  2. Whores by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    People are whores and will take whatever comic book bullshit movies throw at them.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but this one has a cameo by Dildoman and Fleshlight Woman and has a cool after-credits scene that sets up the Massive Dildos team-up movie!

      Sure, the movie itself sucks, but you have to watch it to set up the movie that's going to set up the movie that might be halfway decent.

    2. Re:Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer 'mercenaries' to whores. I am a mercenary. I work for Money. Not I am a whore, I sell my body for sex. I would sell my body for sex, if anyone would buy it, and I found them acceptable, but regrettably, no one I would find acceptable wants sex with me for money. And my fiancée (surprisingly enough I have one!) would probably be upset.

      So please, use the proper pejorative term.

      Thanks.

    3. Re:Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you think about it whores are really just sex mercenaries. So you're not actually saying anything substantive here.

    4. Re:Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fleshlight Woman

      Shielastretch is the obvious choice for this role.

  3. Re:Attention spans that can only be measure in nan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 many words. Need summary!

  4. I noticed that, and I kept on going... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Next time you're on Facebook, pay attention to how the popular videos in your newsfeed are edited. Is the most interesting image the first thing you see? And does that trick get you to stop scrolling and watch?...

    Contrary to what the content creator fantasized would happen, the advertisement in front of the advertisement didn't fool me. I looked at it as little more than clutter that got in the way of me viewing what I wanted to view, so I just moved on without viewing what I had wanted to view.

    .
    It never ceases to amaze me how the content creation types think that annoying their indented audience increases viewership.

    1. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never ceases to amaze me how the content creation types think that annoying their indented audience increases viewership.

      Sadly, they're not wrong. They might be wrong for some specific individuals, but in the aggregate over the entire population, they're not wrong.

    2. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on the target of the ad. I don't go to the movies often so when I go on my once-or-twice stop a year I find out more about what's new in that 15 minutes than I do from all other sources combined. I don't imagine I'm their target but how many people sit on IMDb looking for every new release?

    3. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      ...Next time you're on Facebook...

      Contrary to what the content creator fantasized would happen, the advertisement in front of the advertisement didn't fool me.

      You're on Facebook....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll summarize it for you:

      Hey, remember Jason Bourne from that interesting movie where he didn't know who he was and hooked up with that hot German chick to help him unravel the mystery?

      Well, he's back. The hot German chick is long gone, he found out who he was two sequels back, and there is no reason to still be making movies about him. But, hey, there is a cool car chase and fight scene! So give us your money now, please.

    5. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never ceases to amaze me how the content creation types think that annoying their indentured audience increases viewership.

      FTFY ;)

    6. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " that annoying their indented audience "

      I think indentation is quite useful, myself.

    7. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't even catch it. I did however get plenty of the youtube trailers saying the trailer was going to be released Thursday.

    8. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Nope the first few seconds which generate the screen shot people start with are just the "album" art covers. Yes like "album" covers the are advertisements, a few will be noteworthy even if the content sucks.

      In the end it doesn't matter. Some will cough up money and most will Ignore it due to excessive advertising.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    9. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Nope the first few seconds which generate the screen shot people start with are just the "album" art covers....

      That's probably the rationale the content creator tried to use to justify the fantasy, but I don't buy it, I am not forced to stare at an album cover before I can listen to an album. I can just pick up the album, skip over the cover and listen to the music.

      .
      imo, the equivalent to the album cover would be the picture I click on in order to select the video (trailer) for viewing.

    10. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup ignore everything after ultimatum.

    11. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Bourne Ultimatum is the one between Bourne Mediocrity and Bourne Redundancy, right?

    12. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      It never ceases to amaze me how the content creation types think that annoying their indented audience increases viewership.

      They think that because it works. Just because it doesn't work on you or me, doesn't me it isn't working.
      I worked on a project for a streaming audio solution for a popular youth retail chain. They had metrics of the type and volume of music that promotes more sales. And they had stats on days when a particular store's music system failed, and sales dropped off along with it.
      Personally when I hear the loud music, I turn around and walk out, but their target market isn't me.

    13. Re:I noticed that, and I kept on going... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's getting to where we could replace Bourne with a shell script :)

  5. It's an attention grabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like the "Oh no, my butt trumpet is about to blow!" at the start of the poo-pourri ad.

    1. Re:It's an attention grabber by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Prefer to "About to carry out some strategic air strikes"

      --
      Time to offend someone
  6. Re:Attention spans that can only be measure in nan by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    TL:DR

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  7. Running out of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike music, it seems there is a limit to the number of unique storylines available to movie and TV producers. Hence the wave of recycled superhero movies, TV scripts merely one-upping each other on "shock factor", acting bumping up against the limit of what it means to be "animated", etc. It seems obvious that they're simply running out of ideas, yet movies and TV are as popular as ever. Maybe I'm out of touch, but I honestly don't get it. They ought to just take the Brady Bunch, word for word, and simply apply Millenial-speak where you raise the pitch of your voice at the end of every sentence, as if you're asking a question. That should be worth a few hundred million.

    1. Re:Running out of ideas by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      where you raise the pitch of your voice at the end of every sentence

      Oddly enough, my Russian teacher told me that this is normal in the Russian language and that it is backwards from English. Dropping the pitch implies a question.

    2. Re:Running out of ideas by Ken+D · · Score: 2

      It's called up talking? and it's quite annoying? you know? Like you are pretty insecure? and not sure of yourself?
      it's almost as bad as ending every sentence on a giggle?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    3. Re:Running out of ideas by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      They ought to just take the Brady Bunch, word for word, and simply apply Millenial-speak where you raise the pitch of your voice at the end of every sentence, as if you're asking a question.

      Didn't Jan Brady already do that in the original? (Or maybe it was some other kind of bitchy whining...)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Running out of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike music, it seems there is a limit to the number of unique storylines available to movie and TV producers.

      (Thud) "Only One Man..." (Thud) cue violence (Thud) "Could Save the World..." (Thud) cue more violence (Thud) "From .." (cue) people jumping out of door/window ahead of a supersonic 1500-degree explosive fireball.

    5. Re:Running out of ideas by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I don't watch much TV or movies anymore. I can't find anything that interests me anymore. Perhaps a few documentaries. I used to like to watch TV. Not even Netflix works for me any more(well their recent geo blocking helped killing it too).

      These days all I see is Youtube videos with people who has something interesting to say/show/explain.

    6. Re:Running out of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Russian teacher isn't telling you the whole story on pitch changes. You should seek out some samples of native speakers asking questions.
      It would be more accurate to say that the question word that you wish to emphasize is usually raised in pitch (as well as volume, typically) compared to your normal baseline pitch. That's true even if the word comes at the end of the question, but Russians don't typically put the question word there.
      "Do you want to watch a film" -- " ?" -- in Russian the first syllable is raised in pitch (a short spike, just on the syllable) and the rest is relatively flat. In English, the last word would rise in pitch with a peak at the end. But if the Russian wanted to emphasize the word "film" (as in, "you want to watch a FILM?" rather than watching something else), they'd put the word "film" in the middle and that's where the pitch rise would go.

      In the rare case of a Russian putting the primary interrogative word at the end, and the word having its accent on the last syllable, it comes out sounding remarkably like English. But this almost never happens because choice of word order is so different.

    7. Re:Running out of ideas by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      It seems you've never written a four chord song...

      Axis of Awesome - Four Chord Song
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  8. they also use learning psychology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a well known technique when teaching people something: you first tell them what you are going to teach them, then you go through the teaching process, then you tell them what they have just learned. This helps people retain the information better than just the middle bit alone. It's used in all kinds of classroom teaching and other legit applications.

    Pre-movie ads now do this. I don't remember the exact words because I try to tune them out, but it goes kinda like:

      "In the next segment, you will see how Toyota cars can make your life better, how Pepsi can quench your thirst, and how Microsoft products can enrich your online life."

    followed by 15 minutes of Toyota, Pepsi, and Microsoft commercials

    followed by, "You have seen how your life is improved with Microsoft tablets, how Toyota is working to give you better mobility in your world, etc"

    It's designed specifically to embed this shit even further into your mind. I find this almost intolerably irritating, and avoid theaters now because of it. All advertising is manipulation on some level, but this has taken it to an unacceptable level, IMHO.

    1. Re:they also use learning psychology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?"

      Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

  9. The reason is simple by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    5 seconds is all you have before YouTube allows its user to give you and your ad the finger and finally see what he actually wanted to see.

    And you don't think that they make 2 different versions of the trailer? That costs MONEY!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This came to me immediately as well. They are just producing it once and running it everywhere.

    2. Re: The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't know it was 5 seconds.... Good thing I run AdBlock+

    3. Re: The reason is simple by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Some can't be skipped, actually.

      Honestly, I don't mind the 5 second ads. People make content, I watch it, enjoy it, they should get something for their troubles. It's only pennies that they get anyway, and I also feel that YouTube should get their share of the money. Yes, yes, evil big corporation and it's so big and powerful and greedy and rich and whateverelse, but in the end, it's providing a service to me.

      And that's 100 times more than I could possibly say about the MAFIAA.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:The reason is simple by Mascot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this, although my take on it would be slightly different.

      Five seconds is what they have to let me know what the ad is for, so I'll know if it's something I'd consider watching all the way through. If I can't tell what the ad is for (game, movie, shampoo, whatever) before I can click it away, it's gone. I've noticed some text, or at least a logo, tends to show up more often now than it used to. I can only guess the reason's related.

    5. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. There are ads on YouTube? Oh, I guess I forgot because I pay for a family license for Google Play music and it comes with YouTube red. There are no ads now.

    6. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And you don't think that they make 2 different versions of the trailer? That costs MONEY!

      I think they usually make many cuts of the same trailer and then focus group the hell out of them until no soul is left.

    7. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish more YouTube advertisers did this. Involuntary commercials aren't content, no matter how cute or catchy you try to make them. If I have that "Click to skip in 5.. 4.." arrow, you have exactly 5 seconds of my time before I go get what I actually came for. And if I don't have the skip available I will go do something else for a few minutes and just restart my video when I get back. Even in this trailer's case I'd still skip as soon as it's available; if I want to watch the trailer I'll go watch it, though in most cases if I want to watch a trailer I already have, and expecting me to sit there and watch it again isn't helping anybody.

      So a 13 second warm up situation before your announcer kicks in is pointless; you've spent X dollars to create an ad for your thing and all you've shown me is a coworker sidling up to their friend to talk about something before I'm gone. It would be more beneficial for you to just throw your logo up with a quick jingle in the background and a mascot walking by. Hell, make it only 3 seconds long. Don't give me time to skip. "HONDA SALE JULY 4TH TO 16TH SEE YOUR DEALER COMMERCIAL OVER". I don't think I'd know how to deal with that.

    8. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol paying for youtube
      you're a chump

    9. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The reason makes perfect sense.
      If I'm browsing amateur youtube videos, and I see one with a catchy headline, but the video is 8 minutes of bullshit leading up to the one cool thing I wanted to see, then I am not going to watch it.

      Trailer producers know they need to get straight to the fucking point.

    10. Re:The reason is simple by sexconker · · Score: 1

      For the past couple of months Youtube ads have been unavoidable on my phone. It's not to the point where I'll update the hosts file to find out why, but that's probably because it's easier to just skip watching Youtube shit on my phone.

      On my PC, the ads are blocked with my current block lists but Youtube will now sit and wait for an ad to load and play for about 10 seconds before just giving me the video. So I get to stare at a black square for 10 seconds before the video loads whenever they decide it's time for another ad (seems to be about 1/4 of the time). I just switch to a different tab until I hear the audio kick in, or I skip the video.

      Even content I do care to watch I play at 1.5x speed by default just to save time.

    11. Re:The reason is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A family license for red tube? Eww.

    12. Re:The reason is simple by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, I dare say that this is probably going to be the future of commercials. Get prepared for 3-5 second rapid fire blipverts.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Remember Blipverts? by Cornwallis · · Score: 3

    Does anyone else remember how blipverts seemed outrageous? We've far surpassed them...

  11. Front Loading to avoid skiping by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    They know that often advertisements are skipped. By front loading, they are hoping to attract your attention so that you don't click the "skip ahead 30 second" button - either the figurative one in your head, or the real one in your hand.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Front Loading to avoid skiping by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      often advertisements are skipped

      If google knows so much about me, then why do they keep showing me tampon commercials before my requested video of Norwegian tractor pulls?

    2. Re:Front Loading to avoid skiping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because so many of the viewers are coming from firefighter calendar promo videos. You're just noticing that for once you're the minority!

    3. Re:Front Loading to avoid skiping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know that often advertisements are skipped. By front loading, they are hoping to attract your attention so that you don't click the "skip ahead 30 second" button

      Yes, these annoying advertisers want to ambush you with spoilers. Before you react and skip the ad, they quickly give away the plot, the ending or whatever so it's guaranteed you won't enjoy the movie in the theaters.

  12. Re:Attention spans that can only be measure in nan by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    tmw

  13. Where's my cheese??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or does the whole world look like lab mice to the marketing industry???

  14. Jason Bourne - "Official Trailer!!!11!" by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    The only weird thing I noticed about the Bourne one is that it actually includes the text "Official Trailer" in the video.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Jason Bourne - "Official Trailer!!!11!" by Piata · · Score: 1

      That's because Youtube is now flooded with fan made trailers for things that are either in production or fans wish were in production. There's also people that use popular media as a front to push their own random videos/channels/products/agendas. Youtube is a giant dumpster now and you need some way of separating yourself from the "new json bournn trailler!!111" clones trying to leech attention for their own gains.

    2. Re:Jason Bourne - "Official Trailer!!!11!" by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, well, good. There's no way anyone could fake the words "official trailer" in a video.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Jason Bourne - "Official Trailer!!!11!" by sexconker · · Score: 2

      There's a JSON/BASH joke in there somewhere.

  15. I quit watching the trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The performances were so flat, lacking in enthusiasm, I couldn't take it to the end.

  16. Ads to see ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It had already confused me when IMDB started requiring you to what an ad in order to see a trailer, which is in itself an ad.
    Soon it will go full circle, you will have to pay to see an ad before a trailer to see if you want to pay to see the film which itself is prefixed with ads and studded with product placements.

  17. They've got it all figured out by tom229 · · Score: 2

    Now if they could only make the scripts make sense.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    1. Re:They've got it all figured out by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      That should make the movies cheaper to produce too; I figure at least 20% of the $100 million budget for most new films is earmarked for drugs...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. Screw up by irrational_design · · Score: 2

    I thought the Bourne trailer producers just screwed up and included the same footage twice. It never occurred to me that they may have done it on purpose!

  19. I've managed to listen to it until the end! by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    I've managed to listen to it until the end!

  20. Face book has adds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mind you whats a facebook?

  21. Skip this ad in 5... by Punto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not another bullshit "this generation has no attention span" article, that's not it and you know it. The 5 second intro is there because some ads (primarily on youtube) are skippable after 5 seconds. If it was 6 seconds, it would be 6 seconds long. This generation doesn't have a "shorter attention span", they just don't like your boring ad, because nobody ever in history liked your ad. The only thing that's different for this generation is that they have the technology to avoid your ad, because it's crap.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    1. Re:Skip this ad in 5... by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      These companies have really trained me well in skipping and ignoring ads. Nowadays any ad I can't get rid of is like fingernails on a chalkboard. I don't have cable, and paid the extra to get the ad free/reduced Hulu. Usually by time we start watching a DVD/Bluray my finger is a bit sore from bashing the controller to get past all the crap.

      Funny thing is that I actually enjoy movies more. I go to the theater about as often as I ever did (every couple months), but unlike a few years ago I get to go to a fair number of movies I have never seen the trailer for. I got really sick of having the best scenes ruined, but that has become pretty rare recently. I managed to see the latest Star Wars without spoilers (and with a burger and beer). I usually hit up Rotten Tomatoes for a short list of non-crap movies to choose from and call it good.

      Basically the ads reached the tipping point of obnoxiousness that I spend effort and money to block them out as best I can. I spend extra effort to shield my kid, since I still recall how much advertising manipulated me as a kid. 5 second pre-ads are the last desperate flailings of a desperate marketing department.

    2. Re:Skip this ad in 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD and BluRay adds are extremely annoying. If I anticipate that I'm going to watch something, I simply put to disc in the player 30-60 minutes before I want to watch, and that way the ads are all done when I want to watch and I don't even have to bother to manually skip them one by one.

  22. Ads for ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advertising industry is disappearing up its own ass.

    1. Re:Ads for ads by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yo dawg!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Ads for ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      app snaps!

  23. I use AdBlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea what movies are out 99% of the time.

    1. Re:I use AdBlock by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that... it's called Fandango. Movie listed supported by the hope that somebody will actually buy tickets through them. My daughter's friend bought an e-ticket, she just needed to show it at the door on her cell phone... guess what, there's no cell phone reception at the ticket taker station in the theater!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  24. What I hated by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Last couple of times when I used the app for the local theatre chain whenever I went to view a trailer they would toss in a trailer for another movie first. It's annoying enough to have to sit through the commercials and previews at the theatre but now they are doing it in their app for previews. It's like they are trying to make stay away.

  25. Re:Attention spans that can only be measure in nan by quantaman · · Score: 1

    Sorry, only got halfway through comment title.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  26. It follows the first part of the old adage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell them what you're going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them. I do the same thing myself.

    I fart, and notice the fart smelled like shit. I take a shit, then I wipe my ass clean of any shit that didn't as of that point, make it into the toilet bowl, and look down to make sure I got it all.

    Just like at the movies!

    You can probably tell I don't much like anything at the movies, before the feature starts... can't you.

  27. Absolutely Beauitiful by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

    To me this is the advertisement companies getting a clue. It's a 5-second clip that tells me exactly what I need to know, there's another Borne movie. For them to get their message out it has to be very clear at the beginning and end. If we, as the consumer, want to watch the whole thing then we can. If I'm not interested then I will skip it. It's closer to the way things should be.

  28. ads for Ads, pre-trailers and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Previews" are bad at the theater, and the tipping point for me to quit going.
    Ticket prices and snack prices were in there,too.

    Now, dvds have previews, and I can skip them, so it isn't too bothersome.
    Not a Torrenter...

    Eventually, enough people will quit responding to ads and previews, or block them, to make the
    advertising industry a cottage industry.
    ALL of the movie producers will have a menu item on DVDs for "Previews of Other Movies".
    Except SONY, and they will become a small company.

    1. Re:ads for Ads, pre-trailers and such by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You just need to understand how theaters work: there is guaranteed to be 20 minutes of previews before every movie, meaning that if the theater says the movie begins at 6pm, you should walk into the theater and find a seat slightly before 6:20; you will never miss any of the actual movie. When they start inserting advertisements in the middle of the movie like television does, then I'll get upset.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:ads for Ads, pre-trailers and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it is always guaranteed there will be that much in previews before hand, but if the cinema lists when the showing ends, you can subtract the running time from the end time to get the true start time.

    3. Re:ads for Ads, pre-trailers and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind. I go to the movies for the Air Conditioning.

  29. Holy Slow Reaction Time BatMan! by nkhorman · · Score: 1

    This isn't new.... have you watched TV lately....
    Haven't you been annoyed by... err, I mean seen the advertisements for the show that you're already watching ?
    I mean really, ABC and SyFy have been doing this for well over at least a year. (I think. prolly longer.)

    They show you a 5-10 second blip of whats coming up, either just after the commercial break, or just on the way to one.

    Apparently we're just so busy doing other sh*t... err, I mean need to be reminded that we MUST watch to keep the Nielson ratings up, so that the producer can afford to make the next mind numbing MUST see, CAN'T miss episode. You know... the one we've been waiting for ? Right ?

    Maybe if the content was worth watching, we wouldn't need to be ... brow beat.. err, I mean assaulted with all the adds for the prescription medication, err... hottest new vehicle, err.. injury lawyer promising us money for our "pain and suffering"

    Oh.. BTW, thanks to the FDA/FCC (I blame you both equally) for giving us the privilege of being hypnotized by big pharma into believing that we need to tell our doctor that we must have this or that brand of this or that medication to solve our hypochondria-tic nature.

    Wait... do guys here that... baa aaa aaaa - who forgot to lock the sheep in their pens ?

  30. How Deep Is Your Love Yourself by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unlike music, it seems there is a limit to the number of unique storylines available to movie and TV producers.

    Music too has been running out of ideas. Have you heard Justin Bieber's "Love Yourself", which sounds like "How Deep Is Your Love" by the Bee Gees?

  31. Re: Attention spans that can only be measure in na by karnal · · Score: 1

    You kids with your loud music, and your Dan Fogelberg, your zima, hula hoops, and Pac-Man video games

    --
    Karnal
  32. Marketing speak... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Does it have any detectable connection to the real world? You understand the only real skill advertising producers need is the skill to convince businesses to pay them to make advertising; whether or not it makes the actual consumers more likely to buy is irrelevant.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  33. Use copyright against misrepresentation by tepples · · Score: 2

    It can be faked, but doing so is actionable misrepresentation. For example, a work's publisher can make a policy of tolerating small-scale fan-made non-commercial derivatives so long as they are not marked as official, but any misleading upload incurs a copyright strike.

  34. rofl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why, why? because the trailers are better than the films, that's why lol...

  35. No respect by nowsharing · · Score: 1

    Next time you're on Facebook, pay attention to how the popular videos in your newsfeed are edited. Is the most interesting image the first thing you see? And does that trick get you to stop scrolling and watch?

    Translation: We believe that our readers are fucking morons.

  36. Glad I'm not exposed to this shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuck. Keep Facebook, keep your trailers, keep your commercials, no thanks.

  37. blipverts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courtesy of mmmmmax headroom!

  38. Re:Attention spans that can only be measure in nan by srmalloy · · Score: 1

    If the trailers actually were an interesting lead-in to the movie, and weren't just a collection of action sequences that are almost, but not quite, the Cliff's Notes précis of the whole movie, we wouldn't lose interest so fast that they need to shill the trailer at the start of the trailer.

  39. Head on. Apply directly to the forehead. Head on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repetition preys on how our brains and memory work. Simple as that.

    Advertising's is a virus-like meme, and it is the goal of marketers to design the best one that has a chance at getting in any way possible.

  40. How come I see no ads on Youtube? Enlighten me? by KWTm · · Score: 1

    I don't see the ads. I'm not sure why. Can anyone shed any light on this?

    I watch with Firefox on Kubuntu 14.04.

    Now, a lot of videos I grab via youtube-dl, which would explain no ads, but the ones I watch directly don't have ads, either. Generally these are shorter videos (under 10 min), but occasionally I'll watch 1-hour videos (e.g. BBC nature documentaries) and there won't be ads.

    There are ads when my wife does it on her Mac. I was really startled to see them and thought that it was just for that video, but apparently the ads are everywhere.

    I don't think it's just the type of video, as I watch everything from DIY advice to vlogs to stuff from BBC to Lego stop-motion animations.

    Anyone else have no ads?

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
    1. Re:How come I see no ads on Youtube? Enlighten me? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen an ad since 1998. I don't know why people don't run adblockers. If you aren't, you are opening yourself up to malware. It is common sense to run adblockers.

  41. Thanks for the clip! by xarragon · · Score: 1

    I thought you were refering to the crappy online video service blip.tv, used by Channel Awesome and Angry Video Game Nerd back in the day. I just assumed they had done some short, rapid-fire video embedding that caused an outrage. I had no idea that there was a Max Headroom series, let alone one with so much good 80's sci-fi-cheesiness!

    Captcha: 'embeds'

  42. Re: Attention spans that can only be measure in na by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    You kids with your loud music, and your Dan Fogelberg, your zima, hula hoops, and Pac-Man video games

    Hey! I was one of those kids. Zima watered down with tequila though. I'll raise you Dan Fogelberg Longer and Nether Lands on vinyl though a high fidelity amplifier and with full head headphones to hear it.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  43. Oh, Adblock+ can block Youtube ads? Thank goodness by KWTm · · Score: 1

    Oh, I didn't realize Adblock+ could block Youtube ads. I thought Youtube would just serve up a video file that had the ad tacked to the front, but of course I should have realized from the conversation about skipping after 5 seconds that that was not the case. Google would of course send me a customized ad after identifying me from the millisecond timing in my keystrokes typing in the search field, and tailoring the ad to the colour of the sprinkles I use in my ice cream. Hmm, that makes me even more grateful to Adblock+.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]