Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Launches Two Midrange Missiles, Both Tests Fail (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader writes: According to South Korean Defense Ministry officials, North Korea fired two midrange Musudan missiles Thursday, and both missiles appear to have failed. The military cannot confirm exactly when the missile exploded but said it "crashed shortly after it was launched," a Defense Ministry official said. U.S. military officials said the missiles traveled an estimated 200 meters from the launchpad. This past weekend, North Korea launched a ballistic missile from a submarine off the east cost of the Korean peninsula. It only traveled about 30 km, well short of the 300 km range that would be considered a successful test. A little more than a week prior to that launch, North Korea failed to launch an intermediate-range missile on the 104th anniversary of the birthday of the country's 'eternal president,' Kim II Sung.

43 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Great leader is not short by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Great Leader does not fall short - not when in comes to missiles, height, hair size, stomache size, or any other kind of size. His hands are big too.

    Ignore the lies, Great Leader will make North Korea the WINNIGEST country every. They will win so much, you will ask him to stop winning that much. His missiles will fly furthest, his walles will be the biggest.

    Wait - am I still making fun of Kim, or Donald? I forget which.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Great leader is not short by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Dear Leader was not short; rather he was limp

      --
      C|N>K
    2. Re:Great leader is not short by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      Trump trumps lump.

  2. We laugh, but... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We laugh, but failures are how one learns how to do things; we had many dozens of rockets fail before we perfected the technology.

    Eventually they'll figure it out. Then what? I don't trust that crazy government with ICBMs.

    1. Re:We laugh, but... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      We laugh, but failures are how one learns how to do things; we had many dozens of rockets fail before we perfected the technology.

      Eventually they'll figure it out. Then what? I don't trust that crazy government with ICBMs.

      I dunno. When our tests failed von Braun and crew figured out the issue, fixed it, had another iteration. In NK I would imagine each failure adds 20+ people to the labor camps, hard to say if a scientist gets a second chance.

    2. Re:We laugh, but... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Then what? China will not accept any intervention in NK, especially from the US. So, everyone is waiting for an NK mistake as an excuse to intervene: for instance, either a working or non working NK missile that causes damage somewhere in a country nearby. But Russia would not like much (either) a reunited US-South and North Korea. Russia said "we'll invade NK if they keep provoking..." ; so they're also waiting for the mistake, to be there, first...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:We laugh, but... by dj245 · · Score: 1

      We laugh, but failures are how one learns how to do things; we had many dozens of rockets fail before we perfected the technology.

      Eventually they'll figure it out. Then what? I don't trust that crazy government with ICBMs.

      Back up a little and ask why they are doing this. Is it because they want to invade the South? No. They aren't stupid or suicidal. When we vilify these people, it is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that way. But they want to continue their way of life the same as everyone else.

      So why are they really doing this? Because they fear that the USA will invade THEM. That isn't an unreasonable assumption; the US has invade Iraq, Afghanistan, bombed Libya, and meddled in many other countries and toppled regimes. Just in the last 15 years. We hold huge military exercises in South Korea every year, including landing exercises. That's very scary for any country. North Korea is the animal in the corner baring their teeth. The US doesn't have a real interest in talking without the DPRK agreeing to a long list of preconditions, so being aggressive is the most reasonable option for them.

      At a bare minimum, the two countries could discuss what to do about Americans who violate North Korean law while visiting the country. There is no process, informal or formal, since the two countries don't have diplomatic relations. That's why every time it happens it is such an ordeal. Even just having a single, official US diplomat in-country would be a huge help. It takes 2 parties to be at odds and the US is definitely not putting North Korean diplomacy on any sort of priority for peace. Instead, we play into their propaganda. There are written plans to invade, assassinate the leadership, and teams of people who work to maintain information current enough to do exactly that. It isn't paranoia if the man is actually out to get you.

      We need to start treating Kim Jong Un the same as the Japanese Emperor in 1945. The US insisted for years on unconditional surrender. Eventually the US realized the importance of the man as a symbol, regardless of any bad deeds he may or may not have done. It was important to the Japanese people, therefore it was important to the USA. Kim Jong Un is extremely important to the North Korean people, perhaps even more so than the Japanese Emperor in 1945. We get nowhere by treating him with disrespect, despite how good it may feel to vilify an enemy. It only galvanizes the people against us. We need to soften that animal in the corner, not poke it with a stick. The US has all the power in this relationship. Obviously. It is time we used that power responsibly to make a deal where both parties can get what they want. Deals made at the end of a gun don't tend to last.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re:We laugh, but... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      If the Russians did not have nuclear weapons they would be just another 3rd world wannabe power.

      This is factually wrong. Russia will always be "2nd world" by definition.

      It's good you posted as A/C so as to prevent such a post from being associated with your identity. Words have meanings.

      Coupled with the fact that the state of California has a higher GDP than Russia also means they have no economic leverage to on the international stage.

      Big freaking deal. I have no love for Russia (or the mad man they have as a leader), but Caliornia's economy is HUGE.

      The big surprise is that China has let NK get to this point without intervening. They could close their border and stop all deliveries of food, oil, and coal shipments. This would give NK just enough rope to hang themselves. Any hostile response directed from NK to China would give the Chinese all the reason they need remove all existing NK leadership and install their own people to govern the state. China would not face any criticism from the international community for their actions. As it stands NK actions have resulted in all the surrounding countries upgrading their missile defense systems that when coupled with the increase in US missile defense systems could weaken China's nuclear deterrent.

      China needs an unstable NK, but not too unstable. Too stable or unstable, they risk the Koreas reuniting and China does not want a powerful ally to the US right on their border.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  3. Does anyone think these failures are deliberate? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    .... so that if they were to actually try and do anything that actually posed a danger, nobody would take it seriously until it was too late?

  4. Well..... by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    You learn from mistakes and try again, unless you are summarily executed for failing.

    I have no doubt that's the case here.

    "here top scientist, take these marbles a rubber band and a corkscrew and make super death missile"
    "You failed, *bang*"

    1. Re:Well..... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      I think an even bigger problem is how the decision makers are chosen. I seriously doubt the best minds and organizers end up controlling these critical military programs. I can tell you from experience that sycophants are normally not very effective at anything other than empire building.

  5. Re:Does anyone think these failures are deliberate by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

    .... so that if they were to actually try and do anything that actually posed a danger, nobody would take it seriously until it was too late?

    Define "Deliberate"? As far as a country with limited funds and resources intentionally destroying missiles in an attempt make the rest of the world roll our eyes at them, I highly doubt it. Rushing the launches, without properly evaluating what caused the previous failures and making the necessary adjustments in order to ensure success, just to look like they're doing something fearsome? More likely. Same goes for their nuke tests. I doubt they're wasting fissile material on super low-yield detonations just to be sly.

  6. Re:Again With This Asshole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are a whole lot of folks just south of the border with a whole lot artillery aimed up their noses. I'd say they have plenty of reason to be concerned about these lunatics.

  7. Consider these factors by bretts · · Score: 2

    He is allied with China, who is allied with Russia; the Russians have been a major force in both World Wars and the Cold War. While North Korea may be small, it could be the location of a trigger event that will have us all nervous (insert mushroom cloud here).

    1. Re:Consider these factors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GTFO
      The USSR was a real threat, now BOTH China and Russia are sick of NK
      Threat level 0

    2. Re:Consider these factors by slazzy · · Score: 1

      China doesn't align with anyone other than the dollar.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  8. Re:Wonder... by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    Little Kimmy Jong Un can't get it up!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  9. Re:Like a shithouse rat by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yet, we have seemingly no interest in freeing the North Korean people

    More an issue between South and North Korea. Of course, we'd help our ally. China, on the other hand, doesn't want the regime to collapse. Millions of refugees crossing the border to deal with. Plus, having a mad dog in the back yard might come in handy.

    The thing that I think will bring China around is: When the NORKs get a warhead working and manage to fit it onto a missile, Beijing will be a much easier shot than the USA. And Kim Jong-un is crazy enough to try and blackmail China for aid.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Re:Like a shithouse rat by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    We do not want to upset trade with China. If China asked us we would. China will not ask though.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  11. collateral damage by serbanp · · Score: 2

    Given the way this "country" operates, I'm pretty sure that after each failure heads are rolling, literally. A few more such failures and NK will run out of rocket scientists and missile commanders...

    1. Re:collateral damage by dangle · · Score: 1

      One wonders if this is true, but beyond the internal and external DPRK propaganda, it seems like there must be enough men and women of reason in their government and research facilities to make the case for and maintain these complex weapons/energy programs in a relatively protected environment, knowing that failures and quality improvement are necessary and inherent to the process.

      That sentence was a lot longer than I planned, sorry.

  12. Re:We could solve this right now by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and the end of seoul at same time.

  13. Re:National Socialism by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Don't think of left right as plots on a line. Think globally - literally. If you go east long enough you can get to points in the west. Now add in latitude and realize that the distances can be longer or shorter or a combination of both.

  14. And yet we fought them by bretts · · Score: 1

    Chinese involvement was determinative in both Vietnam and Korean wars. Cold War bullshit, or real history?

    1. Re:And yet we fought them by peragrin · · Score: 1

      True but that was before China was a trading partner of the USA. Right now China has more to lose with Keith Korea going off the rails than to worry about a unified Korea democracy.

      What no one realizes is that reunification of the Korea is now impossible. To much time has passed.

      China's best method is to absorb North Korea into China, and remove one half of the population to 1000 different Chinese cities. But China really doesn't want to deal with that.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  15. Left and Right by bretts · · Score: 1

    Don't think of left right as plots on a line

    I never would use such a simplistic device. I simply think of them as two competing theories.

    1. Re:Left and Right by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Nationalism is not a left/right concept. It's a good thing when done right, but a bad thing when done wrong. It's what gave much of Europe its borders. Good when the random germanic states decided to unify as a country, or when the Baltic regions figured they could kick out the Tsars, but bad when Napoleon decided he could sweep across the world.

  16. Re:Were they using KSP... by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    that would only be equivalent to an P60000-7. About enough to send five tons up 150m.

  17. Re:Does anyone think these failures are deliberate by Trongy · · Score: 1

    I think they are no more deliberate than the SpaceX failures. What they are attempting is not easy. The fact that North Korea is testing these missiles in earnest is of concern.

  18. Re:Does anyone think these failures are deliberate by slazzy · · Score: 1

    No, if they really wanted to keep their activity quiet, there would be a lot better ways to do it.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  19. Re:National Socialism by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Hitler wasn't socialist. He claimed that title because early on it got some votes, but never did he or his party have any kind of socialist ideas or policies.

  20. Re:Like a shithouse rat by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but China is an ally, the US is the enemy (and by extension South Korea). Kim might be a bit nuts but he is not going to fire a missile at China becuase it would be "easier", or blackmail his only fucking ally.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  21. Re: Does anyone think these failures are deliberat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In fact one of SpaceX's successes was to land a rocket very near where it was launched from. So maybe N. Korea "making a missile that only went 30 meters" was actually very clever of them.

  22. How valuable is trade? by bretts · · Score: 1

    True but that was before China was a trading partner of the USA.

    I'm not sure that's going to influence their decision much at all now that China has other trading partners, and the USA's importance is fading. You only buy debt from and sell products to superpowers, and it's hard to argue the USA is still one of those at more than a military level.

    1. Re:How valuable is trade? by Outtascope · · Score: 1

      That is a complete load of horseshit. Again, another trope from politicos who have manipulated the public into believing that they need to "take their country back" or "make America great again". Just go look at the stats, the WTO is a good place to start. The military issue isn't even a question, no one is close. Economically? The US's GDP per capital is almost 5 times China's. If that doesn't count as superpower, then I would like to know your definition of that word.

      Are China and other countries gaining ground? Sure they are. But the sky most definitely is still up there, mon petit poulet.

  23. Check out points 7, 9-11, 13-15, 20 by bretts · · Score: 1
  24. Rewritten History by bretts · · Score: 1

    Napoleon was an internationalist, not a nationalist. I compiled some historical data into a FAQ: http://www.amerika.org/nature/...

  25. "North Korea Announces Two More State Exedcutions" by 0xG · · Score: 1

    They are going to run out of rocket scientists. Maybe they can use rocket scientologists - they'll never know the difference.

    --
    A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
  26. Re:Like a shithouse rat by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

    Well, part of the problem with resuming the Korean War is the fact that Seoul, a place we happen to like, is within artillery range of NK. Unless the first strike took out the vast majority of the NK artillery, lots of innocents would die in Seoul. Would it be nice if North Korea had a better government and some measure of freedom and prosperity? Of course. But getting there will not be easy, and a lot of people are going to die.

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  27. Re:Again With This Asshole? by Outtascope · · Score: 1

    Listen Webster, when in a hole...
    This is an expletive sentence structure, and "a whole lot of folks just south of the border with a hole lot [sic] artillery aimed up their noses" is the complete subject.
    The South part clearly refers to the South Koreans, unless you are from Australia. Not because North and South are different there, but because they allow Barnaby Joyce to continue to hold office under the guise of protecting animals and thus might be expected to get things diametrically incorrect.
    You are correct though that "they" in the second sentence refers to the subject of the first sentence, you just misidentify the subject.
    Props for using the correct form of "you're" though, that's not common for folks who refuse to issue a mea culpa after they are called on being so clearly and incontrovertibly incorrect.
    Remember, sometimes it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool...

  28. Let's revisit this in ten years by bretts · · Score: 1

    I think it will be quite interesting. Seriously, let's come back to this thread ten years from now. We will then have much more data to work with, I'd think.

  29. 1984 by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    You'd never think there'd be such a thing as an orwellian 1984 nightmare nation - but North Korea pretty much is it.
    What an utterly bizar spectacle.
    I hope this fatso dies painfully of an heart-attack whilst shitting on the toilet and that the people of North Korea can finally have a peaceful and halfway decent republic of their own. After burning all the images and idols of him and his kin.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  30. it's a test.... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not like US missle tests have been a success all the time, that's why it's a test.. Look at the failures NASA had and still has, look at the failures other rocket companies have.. It's nothing special if a missle test fails.. comeon, this isn't news.. What's news is the fact US is telling NK and Iran not to build nuclear weapons, but are still the building them themselves.. before you go pointing a finger at others, dispose of your own nuclear weapons.