3D Printing Industry To Triple In Four Years To $21 Billion (computerworld.com)

Year-over-year the 3D printing industry has grown by as much as 30%. Now, it's set to triple in revenue over the next four years, according to a new report. For comparison, this year the industry will reach nearly $7.3 billion, and by 2020, it is expected to reach nearly $21 billion. Published by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA) and the United Parcel Service (UPS), the study, called "3D Printing: The Next Revolution in Industrial Manufacturing," revealed that the two biggest industries representing a combined 40% of the growth are consumer electronics and automotive. Medical devices will represent about 15% of the growth. North America and Europe will account for more than 68% of the 3D printing market revenue, while the Asia Pacific market will account for about 27% of sales. Here's an impressive stat: 3D printing represents only 0.04% of the global manufacturing market right now. However, if 3D printing captures 5% of global manufacturing capacity, which researcher firm Wohlers Associates believes it will, the industry would be worth a staggering $640 billion. "This is a market ripe for disruption," the report said. "Technology adopters that move beyond prototyping to use 3D printing in supporting and streamlining production can achieve new manufacturing efficiencies. Plus, there is an enormous opportunity for companies that get it right."

Comments

Still awaiting consumer usage.

[jellomizer]

I like the Idea of the 3D Printer. However for the normal consumer what you can make with them isn't worth the price.
In theory I would be able to 3d print replacements parts for many devices. Fix a broken key on your keyboard, Cell Phone Case, Random Decorations...
However the cost of few thousand dollars with the cost of consumables, over a period you expect to use the device say 10 years, you will probably make a couple hundred dollars worth of material.

Now I am not saying 3D printers are useless, they make more sense in Maker shops where they can be used over a long time, as well making objects that are hard to create in low volumes in other ways.

Re:Still awaiting consumer usage.

[serviscope_minor]

I agree. I think 3D printing is best left to professional print shops. Just send your design files, and they'll send the object back. That way you get much higher quality and lower prices.

As someone who started out using a 3D printer at my local hackspace and who owns one, I disagree strongly. 3D print shops get incredibly expensive very very fast compared to having your own. You can get surprisingly good quality out of even a low end printer, but one of the key points is that having your own one lowers the friction involved in the process. When consumables cost 25 quid per kilo from a highstreet shop in London, you don't have to worry about botching a print or two or getting the design worng and iterating.

din,ding,ding

[zlives]

"disruption" key word detected, article can be safely ignored

Let's not get too excited just yet

[sjbe]

For comparison, this year the industry will reach nearly $7.3 billion, and by 2020, it is expected to reach nearly $21 billion.

That sounds like a lot (and it is) but compared to the overall manufacturing market it's virtually a rounding error. The US manufacturing sector alone is something close to $2 Trillion and the US accounts for something like 17% of global manufacturing. (China is somewhere around $3 Trillion currently and Japan is around $800 Billion) For reference $7.3 billion is just a bit smaller than the total revenue of eBay. Impressive but hardly world shaking.

Here's an impressive stat: 3D printing represents only 0.04% of the global manufacturing market right now. However, if 3D printing captures 5% of global manufacturing capacity, which researcher firm Wohlers Associates believes it will, the industry would be worth a staggering $640 billion.

That's a common argument made to justify silly valuations of new companies and technologies. "If we capture just 1% of this huge market..." while conveniently ignoring how difficult actually doing that will be. Capturing just a few percent doesn't sound like a lot but actually it really is a monumental task. 3D printing has tremendous potential and I expect it to really be a huge deal in the coming years but it's going to be a while before it captures even 1% of global manufacturing, much less 5%.

A lot of manufacturing is not aided at all by 3D printing. For example my company makes wire harnesses. 3D printing is useful in our industry for some fixtures, prototypes and the odd bit of tooling but it's a wildly inefficient way to make a wire harness or any sizeable quantity of the parts that go into one. There are other technologies that are far more cost effective for volume production. That's not to say 3D printing isn't super helpful but it's not even close to replacing even a fraction of a percent of what we do. Same is true for plenty of other manufacturing technologies. 3D printing is great for low volume production and while I expect it to speed up, there are other ways to make things that often are much more economical and/or effective which 3D printing will struggle to displace.

Until it cuts into profits, that is

[Opportunist]

No later than when people start printing spare parts for their car we'll see this whole development grind to a halt. Car manufacturers make a fortune by selling plastic parts costing pennies for double digit dollar amounts. They will not allow you to take that from them.

And they have shown before that they're not above buying laws that protect their business.

Re:Until it cuts into profits, that is

[Opportunist]

No doubt about that, and it is certainly nothing you'd start a business over. But we're talking about 3D printers getting as omnipresent as inkjet printers are today. Everyone has one. Modelling? Please. You know how the internet works, don't you? One modeler is enough for millions of people to have something to print.

Engineering time? Gone. Packaging and Transport? Gone. Markup? Gone.

What's left is a part that is most certainly more expensive to make than the injection molded one. But it's still cheaper for the guy needing it, and that's what counts. I don't care what it costs you to make a part. I care what it costs me to have it.

Re: Get ready for

[FatdogHaiku]

That sounds about right. Demand for Elon Musk branded batteries will skyrocket.

OK, if we are talking branding, how is a guy with that name not already selling cologne?

DMLS and SLS are the future.

[Gravis Zero]

Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) are going to continue driving change in manufacturing. DMLS/SLS is effectively building metal/plastic objects by putting down a thin layers of material and melting the parts of each layer you want in the final product. the end result is you can make objects in any shape you want with a tolerance of 100 microns and they are quite robust. a second process is needed to make them nice and shiny objects but when you combine our many three axis tools into a single machine, you end up with a single machine that can go from raw materials to finished product, electronics included. this is the endgame for most of the objects that people buy today and it's going to lay waste to a large segment of manufacturing industry. the good news is that this will advance our recycling efforts as well as the open hardware movement.

Re:pollution

[serviscope_minor]

When they can use natural materials which don't fuck up the environment I'll take some notice.

So not only do you hold it to a higher standard than all other industries, you're also wildly ignorant about it. The most popular feedstock for FDM printers is polylacticacid which is both bio derived and biodrgradable.

Till then it's crap.

It's almost like you're looking for excuses to shit on things.